Tag: worrying

  • As delivery staff stress levels reach worrying highs, food delivery apps start acting

    As delivery staff stress levels reach worrying highs, food delivery apps start acting

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Ajay (name changed), working as a delivery boy of a popular online-delivery platform, was rushing to deliver his order, but got stuck in peak-hour traffic and thus was late to deliver his order. He called up the customer to inform his situation.

    Instead of being empathic, the customer called up his company to complain. Soon enough Ajay lost his job.

    Hamid (name changed) accidentally pressed the doorbell of a house, he was abused. The list is endless.

    In the world of instant delivery, every other day we hear stories where delivery boys are beaten, abused or assaulted. Often they have to traverse in the harsh sun, wind and rain; face longer hours of work and traffic snarls.

    “There has been a consistent growth in consumer confidence for ordering online, steered by tech-led delivery networks. This, in turn, has unlocked the long-term potential of ready-to-eat food delivery,” Prabhu Ram, Head, Industry Intelligence Group, CMR, told IANS.

    “For food delivery startups seeking to attain sustainable and long-term market leadership, this market opportunity requires them to deliver not just on the instantaneous consumer delight, but rather the employee experience as well,” he added.

    Owing to their tough workstyle, delivery boys often face a lot of stress, which can affect their mental health.

    “Uncertainties of day to day life, life risks, long time periods, financial stress. It certainly impacts mental health. As a result they may engage in unhealthy coping mechanisms like consuming substances or other desperate measures to manage stress,” Mimansa Singh Tanwar, Clinical Psychologist, at Fortis Hospital, told IANS.

    “To maintain positive mental health for them, it is important to improve the manager employee relationship where they practise values of empathy, integrity, gratitude and positive encouragement towards them,” she added.

    Tanwar suggested that the delivery boys should be incorporated in the employee wellness programmes, and since there is also a connection between money and mental health, financial aids should also be there to support them.

    Delivery boys should “focus on what they can control and engage in healthy stress mechanisms like building good support systems through positive family and peer relationships, and avoid engaging in unhealthy consumption of substances,” she noted.

    In the movie ‘Zwigato’, helmed by Nandita Das, ace comedian and actor Kapil Sharma plays the role of a delivery boy, and showcases their struggles. Kapil shared that the character made him realise how tough life is for delivery boys, and that he has become more empathetic towards them.

    “This movie made me realise the challenges that delivery boys face on a daily basis, and I have learned to appreciate their hard work and dedication even more. I am not saying tip them, but I am just saying that we can at least say a thank you with respect and that will make them happy,” Kapil said.

    Meanwhile, several food companies have started several initiatives for its workers. Food delivery platform Zomato recently launched ‘the Shelter Project’ under which the company has set up public resting points where delivery persons can take a break from their exhausting routine and use amenities like the washroom, internet, and phone-charging stations.

    In August 2020, Zomato also introduced period leaves of 10 days in a year for its women employees (including transgender people).

    Swiggy has rolled out ambulance service for delivery executives and their dependents in the case of emergencies.

    [ad_2]
    #delivery #staff #stress #levels #reach #worrying #highs #food #delivery #apps #start #acting

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Liga MX: Worrying streak! Mazatlán FC has 12 games in a row without winning

    [ad_1]

    Mazatlan FC He is experiencing one of the worst moments in his stay in Liga MX after adding 12 games without being able to win and that turns on the red lights despite having a change of coach by Rubén Omar Romano.

    And it is that the Sinaloan team has not been able to establish a positive game mode from several coaches who have passed through the team and that for the moment has them involved in the worst team of the current Clausura 2023 tournament of the MX League.

    These are the twelve games that Mazatlán FC played: 0-2 Cruz Azul, 1-1 Toluca, 2-2 Necaxa, 0-3 Santos Laguna, 1-2 Atlas, 1-2 Santos Laguna, 0-6 America, 2-3 Juárez, 1-3 Puebla, 2-3 Pachuca, 1-1 Querétaro and 1-2 UNAM cougars.

    after the defeat from the ninth day, Pumas de la UNAM has never lost to Mazatlán; add two victories and four draws.

    Mazatlán FC adds only one draw and seven games played so far in nine tournament dates Closing 2023to have only one point in their personal account and what has them in the last place of the general table.

    We recommend you read

    The Sinaloans have eight goals in their favor, while they have 22 goals against, the highest sum in this department for Mexican soccer teams in the Clausura 2023, in second place is the Puebla Strip in second place in goals in against.

    Sports editor in Los Mochis, in charge of the sports agenda of the municipality of Ahome as well as national and international sports such as the Major Leagues, NBA, NFL, Liga MX, Champions League and other international European soccer leagues. He graduated from the Universidad de Occidente Los Mochis campus in Communication Sciences, with a degree in English from the University of Arizona Phoenix campus. He successfully completed the digital sports journalism workshop at the University of Guadalajara. Coverage in the Mexican Pacific League attending the 2019 final between Charros and Yaquis, as well as the Play Offs of the Pacific Coast Basketball Circuit. I was part of the coverage of the NFL Monday Night 2022 in Mexico City, where the San Francisco 49ers and Arizona Cardinals played at the Azteca Stadium. I have worked for EL DEBATE for 11 years, seven of which I have worked as a sports editor in the print area. Since the year of 2020, I entered the digital part in the sports portal, where until now I am part as a Web Journalist. Specialist in issues of Liga MX, Liga MX Femenil, Mexican National Team and MLB.

    see more

    #Liga #Worrying #streak #Mazatlán #games #row #winning

    [ad_2]
    #Liga #Worrying #streak #Mazatlán #games #row #winning
    ( With inputs from : pledgetimes.com )

  • While Biden celebrates a soft landing, the Fed’s Powell is worrying

    While Biden celebrates a soft landing, the Fed’s Powell is worrying

    [ad_1]

    federal reserve powell 03460

    The path ahead will come into clearer focus on Tuesday when the Labor Department reports the Consumer Price Index for January, which is likely to show that inflation fell for the seventh consecutive month. It ran at an annualized rate below 3 percent during the second half of 2022 — an encouraging trend.

    With job growth surging and wage gains leveling off, there is more hope now than in almost a year that the economy can slow along with inflation without a painful recession — a so-called soft landing. But prices still rose faster than they had in four decades last year, and Powell says he’ll do what it takes to keep borrowing costs high and prevent price increases from becoming a more permanent feature of the economy.

    “We’re in an economy right now that obviously has some bright spots and darker spots with inflation still in the process of coming down,” said Tobin Marcus, a senior policy and politics strategist at Evercore ISI who was an economic adviser to then-Vice President Biden. “The president, for very clear reasons, is more interested in highlighting the bright spots, whereas Powell still needs to keep some focus on the need to finish the job.”

    So if inflation is running close to the Fed’s 2 percent target rate even amid a hot labor market, why does the central bank feel the need to repeatedly warn that it’s poised to continue raising interest rates and risk a recession? Inflation is a complicated beast, and there’s a lot of history here.

    Here are five key questions about what’s going on with consumer prices and what might be ahead for the economy, Biden and Powell.

    You said the job market is booming. Why am I always reading about how there might be a recession?

    The Labor Department recently reported that unemployment had hit its lowest level since 1969 at 3.4 percent. The only time it has been lower in modern U.S. history was during the Korean War. It’s an ideal bragging point for Biden, who has touted his record on jobs in his annual State of the Union address and on the road since then. But Powell is eyeing low joblessness with worry that it might lead wages to skyrocket, pushing up labor costs for employers and therefore prices — what’s known as the wage-price spiral.

    As far as the Fed is concerned, inflation is what’s important, but the job market is an important signal about where prices might be headed. Demand for goods and services is what creates jobs, and it’s also what gives people money to spend. That is, a very strong job market is a sign that consumers and businesses will be able to support rising prices.

    Basically, the Fed is willing to risk a recession if it means avoiding what happened in the 1970s — when the central bank backed off on interest rate hikes and inflation repeatedly came back with a vengeance. The logic is essentially this: We know how to deal with recessions. Killing inflation is harder. So it’s better to err on the side of overdoing it, since you can always change course and cut borrowing costs.

    Does the Fed really need to hurt the job market to bring down inflation?

    That’s the multitrillion-dollar question. A lot of experts would say no, pointing to idiosyncratic factors — supply shortages, government spending, Russia’s war in Ukraine — that have driven this bout of inflation and can’t be cured by higher interest rates. Certainly, to the extent that inflation has cooled, a big part of that is the fading of those temporary factors.

    But if inflation doesn’t continue its downward trajectory, Fed officials will want to raise rates higher, or perhaps just keep them at punishing levels for longer, until they see what they call a softening in the labor market — fewer job openings, slower wage growth, and, more than likely, somewhat higher unemployment.

    Wait, did you say inflation has been running just above 2 percent for the last six months? Isn’t that the Federal Reserve’s target? Are they almost done?

    Yes, the Fed’s goal is 2 percent inflation, but no, they’re not done. A big reason price spikes have come down so much is because of gas prices, which are volatile and driven by global circumstances. Powell and his fellow policymakers want to be sure that inflation is cooling across the board. The prices of goods like furniture and cars have dropped, while rents may be slowing their ascent. But for the Fed, swelling prices are still a concern in core services businesses (think restaurants, transportation, health care), where labor costs are a major expense. Over the last six months, prices there have risen 4.7 percent.

    So that’s where wages come in. Are wages growing progressively faster?

    No, wage growth isn’t accelerating. But Fed officials and other economists think that worker pay, which grew about 5 percent in 2022 (compared to a 6.5 percent increase in the CPI), is still rising too fast for inflation to sustainably come back to 2 percent. For comparison, wages were growing about 3.5 percent annually before the pandemic, when inflation was a bit below 2 percent.

    There’s an argument that the Fed doesn’t need to be too concerned because incomes are simply recovering after getting hammered by inflation, and workers will stop pushing for as big raises once price spikes get more under control. But the fact that the unemployment rate is so low has the Fed worried that worker shortages will shift that trend. At the very least, they’d like to see a reduction in job openings.

    All this doesn’t seem to bode well for 2024, and anyone trying to get reelected then.

    Yeah, the Fed chief has suggested that unemployment could rise a percentage point or more as the central bank continues to increase borrowing costs to slow spending. The tension between where the economy is and where it might be heading has been thrown in stark relief in recent days: both Biden and Powell want to bring down inflation, but the Fed is likely to undermine one of the president’s biggest selling points heading into 2024.

    “I believe both [Biden] and Powell would order the same items off the menu,” said Jason Furman, who served as chief economist to former President Barack Obama. “But they think the menu is very different, with POTUS seeing the soft landing as an item that is on it while Powell is much less certain that it is.”

    [ad_2]
    #Biden #celebrates #soft #landing #Feds #Powell #worrying
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • What are we worrying about when we worry about TikTok? | Samantha Floreani

    What are we worrying about when we worry about TikTok? | Samantha Floreani

    [ad_1]

    Is there any platform that creates as much collective angst as TikTok?

    For some, TikTok is just a silly video app. For others, it’s a symbol of our most potent social and political fears. What are young people engaging with? Isn’t it collecting a huge amount of data? Are they being dragged down dangerous rabbit holes? And is China spying on them?

    Concerns about data privacy, hyper-personalisation and exposure to content that could be harmful are all reasonable. But sensationalist headlines, reactionary calls for stricter content moderation – or banning the app entirely – risk missing the forest for the trees.

    TikTok is not some strange aberration; it’s the logical next-step on the pathway of platform capitalism that was laid down by those that came before it. It’s a product of a privatised internet that best serves applications ultimately designed not for people, but for profit.

    I confess: I really like TikTok. For me, it’s become a place of joy and absurdity among the rage, horrors, and tedium of its competitors. As a digital rights and privacy advocate, admitting this feels like a dirty little secret.

    The thing is, it’s possible to simultaneously hate a platform but love the people on it and the things they create.

    But my experience of TikTok is likely to be completely different to yours; that’s by design. TikTok’s commitment to algorithmically curated content is one of the reasons it stands out from the rest. The “For You’” page is responsible for its popularity and profitability – but also its harm.

    As with all social media, there are myriad horrendous marks against TikTok. From TraumaTok and content encouraging disordered eating and self-harm to influencer propaganda attempting to recruit Gen Z to the military, there is no shortage of reasons to worry.

    Australia weekend

    There are also plenty of examples of TikTok being used for social good. Labourers have used it to gain visibility and criticise their working conditions; it’s the home of a growing Indigenous creator community; and many young people use it to organise and amplify their voices on critical political issues.

    What are we really worrying about when we worry about TikTok? Most concerns seem to be misdirected anxieties about the broader status quo of the platform ecosystem. Almost all widely used digital platforms threaten the privacy and security of users. They share information with various governments, have the capacity for cultural and ideological influence, and exploit user data for profit.

    TikTok has shifted emphasis away from mass virality and toward maximum niche-ification. Once it has determined what keeps someone on the app, it takes them deep into the obscure content trenches. Perhaps they lingered on a couple of sad heartbreak videos and now they’re being bombarded with depression content, or re-watching a controversial political video led them to conspiracy theories. Wherever they end up, once there, it can be incredibly hard to get out.

    This is partially why online anonymity is so important – it gives people the grace of exploration and inquiry. It allows people to make choices, change their minds, learn, and grow. TikTok doesn’t make room for this kind of internet exploration; it makes it impossible to have curiosity without consequence.

    TikTok isn’t alone in using engagement and recommender algorithms to curate personalised content feeds, but it does take it to the extreme. This is profitable both because it keeps people scrolling and because there’s very little difference between being able to personalise content and personalise ads.

    Because of its monumental success, other apps are attempting to follow in TikTok’s footsteps, giving us a glimpse into the current trajectory of social media. Instagram recently faced backlash when it started prioritising recommended short-form videos, and just last week, Twitter made the algorithmic feed the default. With a business model this lucrative, it’s not enough to fight TikTok alone.

    Let’s go down our own rabbit hole: if you’re worried about algorithms showing people problematic content, you should be worried about targeted advertising. The logic of personalised engagement is the same. And if you’re worried about targeted advertising, you should be worried about the way data is collected for profit under surveillance capitalism. That’s what enables it.

    And if you’re worried about surveillance capitalism, you should be worried about regular old capitalism. Profit is what drives companies toward invasive data collection and developing algorithms that keep people on their apps for longer.

    But online spaces run for profit aren’t preordained. This is a choice, and we could make a different one. What might social networking look like if the incentive to make money was removed? What might be built if it was in the hands of the people, with the motive being connection, creativity, or community, rather than market competition?

    This is not a call to apathy, but rather, to think bigger. It’s an invitation to take those concerns about TikTok and reorient them. It’s time to broaden our collective political imagination of the kind of online experiences that could be possible if we break the profit-motive stranglehold and make room for publicly owned and collectively controlled social technology.

    [ad_2]
    #worrying #worry #TikTok #Samantha #Floreani
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )