Tag: Wont

  • DMK won’t take legal action against Annamalai in audio leak case

    DMK won’t take legal action against Annamalai in audio leak case

    [ad_1]

    Chennai: DMK leader T.K.S. Elangovan said on Monday that the party will not file a case against BJP leader K. Annamalai in the audio tape leak case linked to state Finance Minister P.T.R. Thiagarajan.

    He said the audio clip was fake and it’s up to Thiagarajan to file a case against the BJP leader as it is a personal allegation against him.

    Elangovan said that since it is a personal matter, it is Thiagarajan who should file a case against the BJP leader, adding that the DMK will not file a case.

    MS Education Academy

    He also accused Annamalai of levelling fake allegations against DMK leaders.

    It may be noted that several opposition leaders, including AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami, have called upon Union Home Minister Amit Shah to probe into the leaked audio clips that were attributed to Thiagarajan.

    Thiagarajan had earlier said in a press statement that the audio tapes attributed to him were fake and that advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technology was used. He said that this was the job of a blackmail group.

    Thiagarajan also said that this group is trying to create a rift between him and his party leader, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #DMK #wont #legal #action #Annamalai #audio #leak #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • BJP’s intimidatory tactics won’t work, TMC will in 2026: Abhishek

    BJP’s intimidatory tactics won’t work, TMC will in 2026: Abhishek

    [ad_1]

    Kolkata: Senior TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee on Sunday asserted that more the BJP uses “intimidatory tactics” against West Bengal’s ruling party, the more number of seats it will get in the 2026 assembly polls, as people will resist the saffron camp’s “gameplan”.

    Banerjee, while addressing a rally at Chopra in Uttar Dinajpur district, claimed that the Trinamool Congress will win not less than 240 seats in the next assembly elections.

    He also maintained the BJP government at the Centre was intimidating opposition parties through frequent CBI and ED raids.

    MS Education Academy

    “From 184 seats in 2011 assembly polls, we got 211 seats in 2016. It went up to 213 seats in the 2021 elections. And keep in mind, TMC will not get less than 240 seats in the 2026 polls. The more the BJP’s conspiracy against us grows using its agencies, the more our seats will go up, with people resisting their gameplan,” he said.

    Banerjee recalled that during the 2021 polls, people had ignored the repeated visits by BJP leaders to Bengal and their “audacious display of power”, to vote the TMC to power for the third time.

    “We will not cower due to their (BJP’s) threats unlike other parties. We will hit the streets with more protests,” he said.

    Banerjee also accused the saffron party of withholding the release of Rs 7,500-crore dues to the state, and said he will lead TMC activists to Delhi next month for an “indefinite sit-in to force the Centre to take note of the woes of the people of Bengal”.

    He said in stark contrast to the Centre’s “step-motherly” treatment to Bengal, the state government has spent Rs 3,500 crore under the rural roads housing project, irrespective of whether a region had elected TMC representatives to power in the last panchayat polls.

    “We produce our report card before the people where every electoral promise from Lakshmir Bhandar, Swastha Saathi’, Aikashree’ to Students Credit Card is accounted for. Can the BJP MPs, MLAs and panchayat members show such a report card? I challenge them. They only know to discriminate,” the TMC national general secretary said.

    The Diamond Harbour MP also claimed that while the state government is providing Rs 500 or Rs 1,000 to women under the Lakshmir Bhandar’ scheme, the Narendra Modi government is “extracting Rs 1,000” from citizens for linking Aadhaar with PAN.

    (Except for the headline, the story has not been edited by Siasat staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

    [ad_2]
    #BJPs #intimidatory #tactics #wont #work #TMC #Abhishek

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Modi won’t be able to stop Kejriwal’s work in Delhi: Sisodia

    Modi won’t be able to stop Kejriwal’s work in Delhi: Sisodia

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A court here on Saturday extended the judicial custody of Manish Sisodia, the former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi, till May 8 in connection with the excise policy case being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

    Addressing the media outside the courtroom, Sisodia said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi will not be able to stop Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s work in the national capital.

    “Modi ji may try as much as he wants, but he won’t be able to stop the work of Kejriwal ji in Delhi. Modi ji may conspire as much as he wants,” Sisodia said.

    MS Education Academy

    On Friday, Special Judge M.K. Nagpal of the Rouse Avenue Court had denied bail to Sisodia, holding that the evidence, prima facie, “speaks volumes” of his involvement in the commission of the offence.

    Additionally, he said that it is impossible to rule out the potential of Sisodia influencing key witnesses in the case.

    On Thursday, the same court had extended Sisodia’s judicial custody till May 12, in the case being probed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

    The ED had earlier submitted before the judge that Sisodia had planted fabricated emails to show that there was public approval for the 2021-22 excise policy.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Modi #wont #stop #Kejriwals #work #Delhi #Sisodia

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Educational institutions won’t face dearth of funds: Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann

    Educational institutions won’t face dearth of funds: Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann

    [ad_1]

    Patiala: Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann on Saturday dubbed financial indebtedness of educational institutions as a social scourge, and said they will not face any dearth of funds so that no child of the state is deprived of the opportunity to get quality education.

    Addressing a gathering on the 62nd foundation day of the Punjabi University here, Mann said it was the primary duty of the government to provide educational opportunities and it is a matter of great pride and satisfaction that his government was doing this work efficiently.

    According to an official statement, Mann said his government was constantly striving to raise the standard of education by providing the maximum support to educational institutions.

    MS Education Academy

    “This university is the pride of Punjab and the Punjabi mother tongue. This premier education institute is also called the ‘heart of Malwa’. I had guaranteed to free this university from the debt burden to restore its pride and pristine glory,” he said.

    Mann further said that in this year’s budget, the state government has earmarked a grant of Rs 30 crore to the university every month. “I sincerely hope that this university will achieve great success in the field of higher education after coming out of financial constraints,” he added.

    The chief minister said the Punjabi University was playing a vanguard role for the youths of the state. “This university inspired me to follow new ways and new ideas in my life. My creativity had taken wings in this university and the stage of Sri Guru Teg Bahadur Hall realised my dreams,” he added.

    Mann further said the state government was making great efforts for promotion and dissemination of the Punjabi language.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Educational #institutions #wont #face #dearth #funds #Punjab #Bhagwant #Mann

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • WFI sexual harassment: ‘Won’t resign’, says Brij Bhushan as protests grow

    WFI sexual harassment: ‘Won’t resign’, says Brij Bhushan as protests grow

    [ad_1]

    Wrestling Federation of India chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh stated on Saturday that stepping down from his position, as demanded by protesting wrestlers, ‘isn’t a huge matter for him’, but he won’t do it ‘as a criminal.’

    “The wrestlers’ demands change all the time. They initially requested my resignation as WFI chief, which I refused because doing so would imply admitting the claims against me. Resignation isn’t a huge thing, but I’m not going to do it as a criminal. I am not a criminal,” he remarked.

    He further stated that it is not a difficult moment for him because he has always faced challenges.

    MS Education Academy

    Brij Bhushan Singh asserted his innocence and stated that he will help with any investigation since he believes in the courts and the investigative authorities.

    “I’ve been subjected to abuses and allegations for months. This grieves my family and supporters, but I need an unbiased investigation. For four months, they encouraged people against me and constantly brought fresh people to make allegations. I’ve always admired the government; they’re the ones that take risks. They say I should be locked up, he said adding that his Lok Sabha seat is not due to “the generosity of Vinesh Phogat (one of the wrestlers leading the protest),” but to the people who support him.

    He went on to say that ‘one family’ and ‘one akhada (wrestling arena)’ were behind the plot. He accused Congress of attempting to smear his name and said ‘one businessman’ was involved in the plot.

    Six days after India’s top wrestlers marched to the streets to demand that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed against Brij Bhushan, Delhi Police agreed to file the FIR on Friday, handing the wrestlers their “first victory in their quest for justice.” The police, backed by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, declared the same before a bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha.

    Two FIRs were filed against Brij Bhushan at the Connaught place police station.

    Delhi police registered two FIRs against Brij Bhushan on Friday. One FIR was filed under sections 354, 354(A), 354(D) and 34 of IPC, a copy of which was received by the wrestlers. Another FIR was filed under the POCSO act, copy of which will be only given to the victim’s family. Vinesh Phogat and other wrestlers reached the Connaught Place police station on Saturday afternoon, news agency ANI reported.



    [ad_2]
    #WFI #sexual #harassment #Wont #resign #Brij #Bhushan #protests #grow

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • The Guide #84: Why movies made by artificial intelligence won’t be the future of film

    The Guide #84: Why movies made by artificial intelligence won’t be the future of film

    [ad_1]

    The artificial intelligence revolution is motoring forward at such a pace that it’s hard to keep up with the torrent of news stories about it, let alone the technology itself. In recent weeks we’ve had AI newsreaders on Kuwaiti TV, an AI-generated photograph winning a major prize, an AI-generated interview with Michael Schumacher that got an editor sacked and, of course, numerous warnings that this all might spell the end of humanity itself.

    It’s natural to feel apprehensive about these society-shaking developments. (I’m already preparing myself for the inevitable “AI writes mildly diverting pop culture newsletter” story.) Even so, the reaction to a recent interview in which Joe Russo speculated on the future of AI-generated film seemed particularly intense. Russo – one half of Marvel-affiliated director duo the Russo brothers – was musing on how generative AI could invent a film catered to the whims of the viewer. Here’s his pitch:

    You could walk into your house and say to the AI on your streaming platform, “Hey, I want a movie starring my photoreal avatar and Marilyn Monroe’s photoreal avatar. I want it to be a rom-com because I’ve had a rough day,” and it renders a very competent story with dialogue that mimics your voice … suddenly now you have a rom-com starring you that’s 90 minutes long.

    For what is essentially some vague spitballing (the tech needed to make such a film seems some way off, if possible at all), Russo’s quotes didn’t half stir a hornet’s nest online, varying from digs at the Russos’ recent output to calls for a meteor to strike the earth before AI gets the chance to ruin cinema.

    Leaving aside the fact that watching yourself meet-cute with a long-dead film star is a deeply tragic notion, I think the reason Russo’s idea is so unappetising is because it is fundamentally at odds with how and why we watch movies. Throughout its history, cinema has been a largely passive medium. For the past 120-odd years we have sat ourselves down in front of a screen and had someone else’s creative choices beamed at us. Sure, whether we respond positively or negatively to what we’re being shown will dictate what gets made and who gets to make it, and our input has been given more weight as film has got more programmatic in recent decades. But there’s a limit to our agency in this relationship.

    AI-generated cinema entirely upends that. Suddenly it’s all about your whims and predilections: a film is served from your point of view, rather than giving you a window into someone else’s thinking. And for an added dose of solipsism, it will be you starring in the film (again, depressing – though it does raise the intriguing/traumatising prospect of watching yourself die on screen).

    A victim in all of this would be the capacity of surprise. Because generative AI is working from a database of the films, characters, plotlines and tropes it knows you have watched and enjoyed, it is unlikely to be able to create something that jolts or discomfits you; that shocking death of the character you felt a connection with or that big brilliant twist that upended everything you thought you knew about the film that you were watching. It’s those creative choices that you as the viewer don’t know you want, or even in the moment are actively repelled by, that often make a film so satisfying, and that’s something that no artificial intelligence can predict.

    I do think AI will revolutionise film, most likely in some horrible unforeseen way. But, as with a lot of predictions around AI and culture, Russo’s idea seems to fundamentally misunderstand why we enjoy the thing in the first place. We’re there to be transported – not algorithmically indulged. If you want a date with Marilyn, you’re better off streaming Gentlemen Prefer Blondes.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    If you want to read the complete version of this newsletter please subscribe to receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday.

    [ad_2]
    #Guide #movies #artificial #intelligence #wont #future #film
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • I back saboteurs who have acted with courage and coherence, but I won’t blow up a pipeline. Here’s why | George Monbiot

    I back saboteurs who have acted with courage and coherence, but I won’t blow up a pipeline. Here’s why | George Monbiot

    [ad_1]

    There’s a fundamental principle that should apply to every conflict. Don’t urge others to do what you are not prepared to do yourself. How many wars would be fought if the presidents or prime ministers who declared them were obliged to lead their troops into battle?

    I can see why How to Blow Up a Pipeline, the book by Andreas Malm which has inspired a new film with the same title, has captured imaginations. It offers a lively and persuasive retelling of the history of popular protest, showing how violence and sabotage have been essential components of most large and successful transformations, many of which have been mischaracterised by modern campaigners as entirely peaceful.

    Malm shows how violence was a crucial component of the campaigns against slavery, imperial rule in India, apartheid and Britain’s poll tax, of the demand for women’s suffrage and even of the famously “peaceful” revolutions in Iran and Egypt. He argues that by ruling out violence and sabotage, those of us who seek to defend the habitable planet are fighting with our hands tied behind our backs. He urges us to develop a “radical flank”, prepared to demolish, burn, blow up or use “any other means necessary” against “CO2-emitting property”.

    Just Stop Oil protesters in London in October.
    Just Stop Oil protesters in London in October. Photograph: Guy Smallman/Getty Images

    It’s essential that we know these histories. Malm forces us to confront questions of strategy and to justify or reject those we have chosen. No one can deny that current campaigns have failed: capital’s assaults on the living planet have only accelerated. Nor can we deny that, as he says, we have been too “placid and composed” or that the climate crisis is insufficiently politicised. Should we, as he urges, begin a campaign of violent attacks on the industrial economy? While his case is compelling, I feel something is missing.

    Malm’s strongest comparisons are with the heroic struggles of women’s rights and civil rights activists, anti-slavery, independence, anti-apartheid and economic justice campaigners. These movements directly confronted massive powers. Their outcomes were, in most cases, binary. Either the British Raj persisted or it didn’t. Either women would get the vote or they wouldn’t. Either there was a poll tax or there wasn’t.

    But the revolt against environmental collapse is a revolt against the entire system. To prevent the destruction of the habitable planet, every aspect of our economic lives has to change.

    Malm reduces our task to “the struggle against fossil fuels”. But fossil fuels are just one of the drivers of climate breakdown, albeit the largest, and climate breakdown is just one aspect of Earth systems breakdown. You could take out all the obvious targets –pipelines, refineries, coalmines, planes, SUVs – and discover that we are still committed to extinction. For example, even if greenhouse gases from every other sector were eliminated today, by 2100 current models of food production alone would bust the entire carbon budget two or three times over, if we want to avoid more than 1.5C of global heating.

    Soil degradation, freshwater depletion, ocean dysbiosis, habitat destruction, pesticides and other synthetic chemicals might each be comparable in scale and impact to climate breakdown. Only one Earth system may need to go down to take others with it, causing cascading collapse. In other words, in this struggle we are contesting not only fossil capital and the governments that support it. We are fighting against all capital and, perhaps, most of the people it employs.

    Anti-apartheid demonstrators run away from a police charge during racial riots, in Cape town, during clashes in 1976.
    Anti-apartheid demonstrators run away from a police charge in Cape Town, South Africa, during clashes in 1976. Photograph: AFP/Getty Images

    Our demands are – and have to be – more complex than any that have gone before. While I believe that taking out pipelines, refineries, abattoirs, coal plants and SUVs is morally justified, do we really imagine we can bring down the Earth-eating machine this way? Can we really hope that government, industry, oligarchs and those they employ or influence will conclude, “Because we cannot tolerate the sabotage, we will surrender the economic system?” If you are holding a virtual gun to someone’s head, you need to know exactly what you are demanding and whether they can deliver it.

    The world has not stood still while we ponder these questions. Governments and corporations are now equipped with greatly increased surveillance and detection powers. If sabotage escalates beyond the mild actions Malm has taken (letting down the tyres of SUVs with mung beans, helping to breach two fences), not many people will get away with it. Some will face decades in prison. Just last week, two climate campaigners in the UK were jailed for between two and three years merely for occupying a bridge. Are we comfortable with goading other people – mostly young people – to step over the brink?

    In the US, we see the growing paramilitarisation of politics. It cannot be long before far-right militias there, already committed to armed vigilantism, evolve into death squads on the Colombian model. As soon as they perceive a violent threat to the capital they defend, they will respond with greater violence of their own. Fascism has been famously described asa counter-revolution against a revolution that never took place”. You don’t have to succeed in generating a new movement committed to a campaign of violence to create a monster much bigger than you are: a monster that will close down the last chance of saving Earth systems. If you are going to take a physical shot at capitalism, you had better not miss.

    I cannot say that Malm is wrong, and that non-violent action is more likely to succeed. After all, none of us have been here before. But if you are pushing other people towards decades in prison while risking a backlash that would close down the last possibility of success, you need to be pretty confident that the strategy will work. I have no such confidence.

    My own belief is that our best hope is to precipitate a social tipping: widening the concentric circles of those committed to systemic change until a critical threshold is reached, that flips the status quo. Observational and experimental evidence suggests the threshold is roughly 25% of the population. I find it hard to see how this could happen if we simultaneously engage in violent conflict with those we seek to swing. But I concede that our chances are diminishing, regardless of strategy.

    In the meantime, I will support people who have already committed coherent and targeted acts of sabotage in defence of the living planet that do not endanger human life. But I won’t encourage anyone to do so, because I’m not prepared to do it myself. This, at least, is one clear line in a world where everything is blurred.

    [ad_2]
    #saboteurs #acted #courage #coherence #wont #blow #pipeline #Heres #George #Monbiot
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • ‘Won’t notify till..’: Centre after Kunal Kamra’s plea against govt’s fact checking unit

    ‘Won’t notify till..’: Centre after Kunal Kamra’s plea against govt’s fact checking unit

    [ad_1]

    Mumbai: The Union government told the Bombay High Court on Thursday that it will not notify till July 5, 2023, a fact-checking unit to identify fake news against the government on social media under the recently amended Information Technology Rules.

    A division bench of Justices Gautam Patel and Neela Gokhale accepted the statement and said since the amended rules would be inoperable in the absence of a fact-checking unit, no urgent hearing was required on stay of the rules as sought by stand-up comic Kunal Kamra.

    The bench posted the petition filed by Kamra, challenging the constitutional validity of the rules, for hearing on June 8.
    Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, appearing for the Union government, told the HC that the fact-checking unit would not be notified till July 5, 2023 so that the court could hear the matter in June when it reopens after the summer vacation.

    MS Education Academy

    Kamra’s counsel Darius Khambata insisted the court hear the matter for interim relief on Thursday itself and argued that the rules would continue to have a chilling effect irrespective of whether the fact-checking unit was notified or not.

    The bench, however, said the rules would not be operable till the unit was set up or notified.

    “The rules, as it currently stands, are sterile or inoperable without this fact-checking unit or committee. Whether once the unit is notified it would have a retrospective effect or not is something that needs to be seen at that stage,” the high court said.

    Justice Patel in a lighter vein said if it is Kamra’s contention that he is going to be putting up some remark or comments or satire and may face action later then he should probably “take a holiday”.

    “Take the summer off. If somebody chooses to be chilled then that is up to them,” Justice Patel quipped.
    The bench also permitted Kamra to amend his petition to challenge the competence of the executive on the issue.

    On April 6, the Union government promulgated certain amendments to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, including a provision of a fact check unit to identify fake or false or misleading online content related to the government.

    Kamra, in his petition, claimed the new rules could potentially lead to his content being arbitrarily blocked or his social media accounts being suspended or deactivated, thus harming him professionally.

    He has sought that the court declare the amended rules as unconstitutional and give a direction to the government to restrain from acting against any individual under the rules.

    The Union government in its affidavit filed in court last week reiterated that the “role of the fact check unit is restricted to any business of the central government, which may include information about policies, programmes, notifications, rules, regulations, implementation thereof, etc”.

    “The fact check unit may only identify fake or false or misleading information and not any opinion, satire or artistic impression. Therefore, the aim of the government regarding the introduction of the impugned provision is explicitly clear and suffers from no purported arbitrariness or unreasonableness as alleged by the petitioner (Kamra),” the Centre’s affidavit had said.

    As per the amendments, intermediaries such as social media companies will have to act against content identified by the fact check unit or risk losing their safe harbour protections under Section 79 of the IT Act.

    “Safe harbour” protections allow intermediaries to avoid liabilities for what third parties post on their websites.

    [ad_2]
    #Wont #notify #till. #Centre #Kunal #Kamras #plea #govts #fact #checking #unit

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Anti JK Forces Won’t Stand Test Of Democracy: Farooq Abdullah

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: The Jammu and Kashmir National Conference President,  Dr Farooq Abdullah on Wednesday said that opportunistic politicians pose a bigger threat to the historical individuality & cultural uniqueness of Jammu and Kashmir.

    While addressing party workers and functionaries from Sangrama constituency at the party headquarters Nawa-e-Subha, Srinagar, Farooq Abdullah said that people have recognized the true face of these opportunists, who behind their deceptive facades are working towards dividing our voice and strength, Dr Farooq said.

    “They know that they cannot stand the test of democracy. Whenever elections are held, people will teach them a lesson. How long can they run away from facing people? One or the other day they have to face them. However I’m sure that people won’t allow them to play with their honour and dignity,” he said.

    Stressing on the importance of maintaining unity in the ongoing struggle for restoration of J&K’s rights, Dr Farooq said, “I see no way of achieving anything in J&K without a lasting unity between different sections of our society. Unity in diversity must be our creed to last for all times and under all circumstances, otherwise there is no end in sight to our common problems in the shape of poverty, unemployment.”

    [ad_2]
    #Anti #Forces #Wont #Stand #Test #Democracy #Farooq #Abdullah

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Xi promises Zelenskyy that China won’t add ‘fuel to the fire’ in Ukraine

    Xi promises Zelenskyy that China won’t add ‘fuel to the fire’ in Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    russia ukraine war ramadan 94162

    BRUSSELS — Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Wednesday reassured President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that Beijing would not add “fuel to the fire” of the war in Ukraine and insisted the time was ripe to “resolve the crisis politically.” 

    While Xi’s remarks — as reported by the state’s Xinhua news agency — made no specific reference to international fears that China could send arms to Russia’s invading forces in Ukraine, his words will be read as a signal that Beijing won’t give direct military assistance to Russian President Vladimir Putin.  

    Xi was making his first call to Zelenskyy more than 400 days into the Russian war against Ukraine, and he suggested that Kyiv should pursue “political resolution” through dialogue — presumably with Russia — to bring peace to Europe.

    For months, Xi had resisted pressure from the West — and pleas from Zelenskyy — for the two of them to have a direct chat. Instead, he held multiple meetings with the diplomatically isolated Putin, including in the Kremlin.

    Wednesday’s call, which according to Ukrainian officials lasted an hour, could ease tension between China and the West over Beijing’s precarious position which has been largely in favor of Putin, analysts and diplomats say. But they also caution that this would not change Xi’s fundamental vision of a stronger relationship with Russia to fend off U.S. pressure, calling into question Beijing’s ability to broker peace satisfactory to both sides.

    In Zelenskyy’s own words, the call with Xi served as a “powerful impetus” for their bilateral relationship.

    “I had a long and meaningful phone call with [Chinese] President Xi Jinping,” Zelenskyy tweeted. “I believe that this call, as well as the appointment of Ukraine’s ambassador to China, will give a powerful impetus to the development of our bilateral relations.”

    Xi, for his part, used the call to reject the West’s criticisms of China amid worries that Beijing was preparing to provide Moscow with weapons.

    “China is neither the creator nor a party to the Ukraine crisis,” he said, as reported by state media Xinhua. “As a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council and a responsible great power, we would not watch idly by, we would not add fuel to the fire, and above all we would not profiteer from this.”

    The call came just days after China’s Ambassador to France Lu Shaye made an explosive remark during a TV interview saying former Soviet countries have no “effective status” in international law and disputed Ukraine’s sovereignty over Crimea, causing an international uproar and forcing Beijing to disavow him in an effort to mend ties with Europe.

    Old splits, new bridges

    One major difference, though, existed between the two.

    Zelenskyy has been clear about the need for resistance to continue as Putin has shown no signs of easing the Kremlin’s military aggression, insisting that negotiations would not be possible while parts of Ukraine remain under Russian occupation.

    Xi, however, said now would be the time for all sides to talk.

    “Now [is the moment] to grasp the opportunity to resolve the crisis politically,” he said. “It’s hoped that all sides could make profound reflection from the Ukraine crisis, and jointly seek a way toward long-lasting peace in Europe through dialogue.”

    Xi announced plans to send a special envoy to Ukraine to “conduct in-depth communication” on “politically resolving the Ukraine crisis.”

    On the other hand, Beijing also accepted the request by Kyiv to send over a new ambassador. Pavlo Riabikin, former minister of strategic industries, was named in a Ukrainian presidential decree Wednesday to take over the ambassadorship left vacant for more than two years since Serhiy Kamyshev died of a heart attack.

    Riabikin is expected to have smoother channels in Beijing, given that the chargé d’affaires, the second-in-command of the embassy, had been given limited access to the Chinese foreign ministry officials since the war began, according to two European diplomats with knowledge of the matter who spoke privately to discuss a sensitive topic.

    ‘Good news’ for Europe

    Europe has piled pressure on China to act responsibly as a top U.N. member — and it reacted with cautious optimism to Xi’s call.

    “Good news,” Finnish President Sauli Niinistö said in a tweet regarding Zelenskyy’s announcement of the call.

    In France, President Emmanuel Macron has reportedly hatched a plan with Beijing to bring Russia and Ukraine to the negotiating table this summer after his recent visit to Beijing — and his office claimed an assist for making the call happen.

    “We encourage any dialogue that can contribute to a resolution of the conflict in accordance with the fundamental interests of Ukraine and international law,” an Elysée official told media in response to the call. “This was the message conveyed by [Macron] during his state visit to China, during which President Xi Jinping told the head of state of his intention to speak with President Zelenskyy.”

    Chinese officials have also been emboldened by their success in brokering a recent deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran, casting a keen eye on playing a role also between Israel and the Palestinians. For Chinese diplomats, this showed the appeal of Xi’s brand new “Global Security Strategy,” wooing third countries away from the U.S. orbit wherever possible.

    One country, though, sounded less than enthusiastic about Xi’s latest moves.

    “We believe that the problem is not a lack of good plans … [Kyiv’s] actual consent to negotiations is conditioned by ultimatums with knowingly unrealistic demands,” Russian Foreign Ministry’s spokesperson Maria Zakharova told journalists, adding that she “noted” Beijing’s willingness to put in place a negotiation process.

    Stuart Lau and Nicolas Camut reported from Brussels; Veronika Melkozerova reported from Kyiv; Clea Caulcutt reported from Paris.



    [ad_2]
    #promises #Zelenskyy #China #wont #add #fuel #fire #Ukraine
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.eu )