[ad_1]
[ad_2]
#Kashmir #Academic #Session #act #tough #complaint #charging #annual #fee #received #private #institution #Kashmir #News
( With inputs from : kashmirnews.in )
[ad_1]
[ad_2]
#Kashmir #Academic #Session #act #tough #complaint #charging #annual #fee #received #private #institution #Kashmir #News
( With inputs from : kashmirnews.in )
[ad_1]
In short, the 80-year-old former mayor has almost no room for error. And this time, she’ll have to support any tough spending compromises her committee tries to reach from the majority. Four women lead Congress’ appropriations panels from both parties for the first time in history, but it’s Granger with the biggest challenge ahead. She says she’s ready.
“I was a school teacher, taught for nine years — high school — then I had my first child, and two years later I had twins,” Granger said in an interview. “And so if I can get through that, believe me, I can get through writing this bill.”
The promises Kevin McCarthy made last month to finally lock in the speakership will make Granger’s job much harder. House conservatives demanded standalone floor votes on each of the 12 spending bills, a feat the chamber hasn’t accomplished since summer 2009. Additionally, the Californian granted their calls for unlimited amendments — which will make it even more difficult to rally enough support to pass the full dozen.
The GOP’s internal hostility over earmarks and demands to cut spending will add to Granger’s burden, as the debt limit raises the stakes in the debate to fund the government before a shutdown strikes in September.
“The lift could get a little heavy,” said Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), an appropriator who split with the panel’s top Republican in supporting the government funding package last December. But he added that Granger is “very strong, in the sense that she’s not going to be rolled by anybody. And that’s an important quality to have.”
Granger won’t have the luxury of largely sitting out spending talks this year, as she did in 2022, and will have to work with Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), her opposing-party counterparts atop the appropriations panels.
DeLauro called Granger a “trailblazer” who made history even before becoming the first Republican woman to chair Congress’ spending committee. The Texas Republican was the first woman elected mayor of Fort Worth, in 1991, and then the first woman to chair the elite defense spending subpanel on Appropriations.
Over the course of her long career, Granger once aligned with her Democratic counterparts on some social issues, supporting abortion access and Roe v. Wade until reversing her stance in 2020. She has sometimes declined to take a stance on hot-button topics, such as treatment of LGBTQ troops.
Learning where Granger draws her personal lines will be key to striking a broader funding agreement later this year, Murray said.
“I think all of us have a big challenge ahead of us this year, but I think the four women at the top of this committee have a commitment to themselves and to each other to do our best to get it done,” the Senate Appropriations chair said in an interview.
Democrats learned more than a decade ago how exhausting it can be to allow the amendment free-for-all that House Republicans are embracing this year for each of their 12 funding bills.
“It is mayhem,” Granger acknowledged, recalling what she observed in 2009 as Democrats gave up on the laborious process, halting floor action mid-debate and forcing through stricter amendment constraints well after midnight.
She said she plans to minimize similar pandemonium by communicating early with members “on both sides of the aisle” to win buy-in for her bills well before they hit the floor.
Indeed, Granger is clear about her plans to try to win Democratic votes where she can — hardly a given, since she voted against major spending bills when they ruled the chamber — and she’ll have some help in that department with the return of earmarks, albeit with new constraints.
But the often-derided practice of directly aiming federal dollars toward home-state projects could rouse the ire of the House’s rebellious fiscal conservatives as Republican leaders work to fund the government this year. About a quarter of the chamber’s GOP lawmakers voted in December to pass on earmarking.
That’s not to mention the long line of Republicans demanding spending cuts as a condition for voting to raise the debt ceiling. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and others are calling for overall funding levels to essentially fall back two years, reverting to the totals Congress passed for the fiscal year that began in the fall of 2021.
Any proposal to reduce military funding in that process is a non-starter for Granger. “I don’t support cutting defense,” she said. “That’s the one that I’m really, really hard-core on.”
And while she doesn’t project a hard-core image, Granger is “tough as nails,” as former Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.) described his successor atop Appropriations in an interview.
“She has a deep respect for the history of the committee,” said Frelinghuysen, who chaired the panel until 2018. “But she’ll do her best to protect Republican interests and the new majority’s priorities.”
Her ability to balance institutional awareness with intra-party self-protection came into full view when she beat three challengers for the Appropriations chairmanship five years ago. When the committee’s GOP top spot opened up, Granger’s seniority didn’t guarantee her the post. She ultimately won after a dramatic, monthslong drive to court a select group of her peers.
As is typical of those leadership races, she benefited from a quiet campaign to leverage influence within the caucus. And McCarthy, himself trying to ascend the leadership ladder at the time, was seen as a key ally of Granger’s.
Looking back, she recalls staying out of the closed-door drama. “I literally just kept my head down and kept doing our work,” she said. “I wasn’t going to spend my time trying to convince people to elect me to that position.”
But she had boosters who wouldn’t leave her race to fate.
Texas Republicans, the largest GOP delegation in the House, talked privately back in 2018 about a strategy for locking in McCarthy’s support despite the Californian’s close friendship with then-Rep. Tom Graves (R-Ga.), one of Granger’s opponents in the committee race. Their proposed offer to McCarthy: back Granger, and every Republican lawmaker from the Lone Star State would support your leadership ambitions.
“There’s no doubt that, when Texas is united, our state has enormous influence here on Capitol Hill. And Kay’s chairmanship is an important part of that,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).
Whether that Texas alliance with McCarthy was secured is a closely held secret. (And it technically unraveled after the 2018 election of Roy, an initial McCarthy skeptic from Texas who later came around.) All Granger acknowledged is that her race to lead the party on Appropriations helped build “relationships that are going to be extremely important as we write” government spending bills.
[ad_2]
#Meet #tough #nails #Texan #GOP #line #spending
( With inputs from : www.politico.com )








Price: [price_with_discount]
(as of [price_update_date] – Details)
Product Dimensions : 9 x 7.2 x 26.1 cm; 1.05 Kilograms
Date First Available : 9 July 2021
Manufacturer : UNILEVER INTERNATIONAL
ASIN : B09969L9XN
Item model number : 8886467039331
Country of Origin : United Kingdom
Manufacturer : UNILEVER INTERNATIONAL, Unilever UK, Springfield Drive, Leatherhead KT22 7GR
Packer : 1.Sawan Agencies, I-2, Kirti Nagar, Plot No.63 PVT No.15, Rama Road Marg, Najafgarh Industrial Area, New Delhi-110015 2)United Distributors, 324, Mysore Road, Haltsons Compund, Opposite R.V. Bajaj Showroom, Bangalore-560039. 3)Mahaveer Marketing8th Floor, B-9, Sai Niketan, Mazgaon, Dr, Mascarenhas Road, Anjiirwadi, Mumbai-400010
Importer : 1.Sawan Agencies, I-2, Kirti Nagar, Plot No.63 PVT No.15, Rama Road Marg, Najafgarh Industrial Area, New Delhi-110015 2)United Distributors, 324, Mysore Road, Haltsons Compund, Opposite R.V. Bajaj Showroom, Bangalore-560039. 3)Mahaveer Marketing8th Floor, B-9, Sai Niketan, Mazgaon, Dr, Mascarenhas Road, Anjiirwadi, Mumbai-400010
Item Weight : 1 kg 50 g
Item Dimensions LxWxH : 9 x 7.2 x 26.1 Centimeters
Net Quantity : 2 count
Generic Name : Surface Cleaner
Penetrates deeply and removes the most stubborn dirt
The new texture is easy to rinse but just as effective to remove all kinds of dirt
It can be used as a kitchen cleaner to clean hobs, sinks, and kitchen tiles, as well as a bathroom cleaner to clean bathtubs, sinks, and bathroom tiles; Experience fresh and uplifting citrusy scent
Item Weight: 1050.0; Item Width: 72.0; Item Height: 261.0; Item Length: 90.0
[ad_2]
#Cif #Lemon #Abrasive #Surface #Cleaner #Cream #Kitchen #Bathroom #Removes #Grease #Dirt #Tough #Stains #Natural #Cleaning #Particles #2x500ml

[ad_1]
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has observed that it is difficult for a woman to live alone after a live-in relationship comes to an end, as Indian society at large does not accept and recognise such relationships.
The court was hearing a bail application of a man who was arrested for not fulfiling his promise to marry the woman, his live-in partner.
While granting bail to the man, Justice Siddharth noted that the woman in a live-in relationship is left with no option but to lodge a case against her live-in partner in such a situation.
“This is one case where the disastrous consequences of live-in relationship have come on the scene. It is difficult for a woman to live alone after breaking of live-in relationship. The Indian society at large does not recognise such relationship as acceptable. The woman, therefore, is left with no option but to lodge first information report against her live-in partner, like in present case,” the order said.
As per the prosecution, the couple were in a live-in relationship for over a year. The woman was earlier married to another man, with whom she had two sons.
Later, she became pregnant on account of sexual relations she had with the accused during the live-in relationship. However, the accused refused to marry her.
The woman alleged that the accused then sent obscene photographs of her to her ex-husband, after which he also refused to live with her.
Thereafter, she lodged a complaint based on which an FIR under Sections 376 (rape) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was registered against the accused.
The counsel or the accused submitted that the woman is a major and she willingly entered a live-in relationship with the accused. She was capable in understanding the consequence of such relationship and there is no allegation that the relationship started with the promise of marriage, he added.
It was further argued that the accused, who has been falsely implicated in this case, has been in jail since November 22 last year and has no criminal history to his credit.
Given the nature of the offence, the evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the counsel for the parties, the one-sided investigation by the police and other grounds, the court granted bail to the man.
The accused Aditya had rejected the allegations and had submitted to the court that the complainant woman is an adult who had entered into a consensual relationship knowing the consequences of such a relationship. He had also rejected the allegation of the false promise of marriage saying he had never made any such promise.
The woman in the case has two children with her husband.
[ad_2]
#Tough #woman #livein #relationships #Allahabad
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

[ad_1]
Britain and the rest of the G7 should urgently agree a tough package of sanctions to impose on China if it escalates military tensions with Taiwan, Liz Truss will argue, as she uses her first public overseas speech to pile pressure on Rishi Sunak.
Speaking in Tokyo on Friday, the former prime minister will urge her successor to be more hawkish in standing up to Beijing, warning coordinated action is needed to block “the rise of a totalitarian China” given “the free world is in danger”.
Truss is expected to raise concerns about the threat to Taiwan’s independence, saying the self-governed island should have its diplomatic status upgraded by being accepted into international organisations.
Other calls to action Truss will make as part of a six-point plan being presented to a conference in Tokyo include the creation of “an economic Nato” and regular audits by democratic countries to reduce dependence on China across critical industries.
Her speech is a further attempt to rebuild her political reputation, after resigning in October and becoming the UK’s shortest-serving prime minister.
However, it will also be viewed as an attempt to put pressure on Sunak to ensure a promised update to the government’s defence and security plan, known as the integrated review, and a stronger stance on China.
Truss herself ordered the review be updated only 18 months after the strategy – meant to look ahead to the next decade – was published, with suggestions China would be reclassified as a “threat” instead of a “systemic challenge”.
During the summer Conservative leadership contest, the then foreign secretary and her allies sought to present her as more hawkish in standing up to Beijing and less enticed by closer economic ties, given concerns about human rights abuses in Xinjiang, the erosion of democracy in Hong Kong and military tensions with Taiwan.
Sunak has backed away from escalating a diplomatic row with China, but stressed in November that the so-called “golden era” of relations was over.
Defence and foreign affairs officials in Whitehall believe that China is closely watching the west’s response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and acknowledge that deep economic sanctions were in part designed to deter other potential aggressors.
But Russia’s economy is substantially smaller, and any sanctions against China would carry potentially much greater consequences for the global economy.
The Guardian revealed earlier this week that government officials were strategising a series of scenarios about the economic fallout if China invaded Taiwan – both due to the disruption to supply chains of items like microchips and the impact of sanctions.
China’s government claims Taiwan as a province, and its authoritarian premier, Xi Jinping, is set on what he terms “reunification”.
Truss herself will admit that having “rolled out the red carpet” for Xi on his state visit in 2015, when she was a cabinet minister, was a mistake. In her speech to the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China symposium, she is will say: “I should know – I attended a banquet in his honour. Looking back, I think this sent the wrong message.”
Taiwan is a “beacon of freedom” and “flourishing democracy, with a thriving free press and an independent judiciary”, Truss will stress, adding that the UK should “learn from the past” and “ensure that Taiwan is able to defend itself”.
Some Conservatives still want Sunak to take a more lenient approach to China. Philip Hammond, a Tory peer and former chancellor under Theresa May, wrote an article for China Daily suggesting the UK and China should “return to business as usual”.
He acknowledged “the background noise to that relationship over the last three years has been challenging”, but said political differences should “not become an impediment” to boosting trade ties.
“Quite honestly, if we only trade with people with whom we have no political differences, we can close half our ports tomorrow,” Hammond added.
[ad_2]
#Truss #call #tough #sanctions #China #escalates #Taiwan #tensions
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

[ad_1]
Islamabad: Tough times are ahead for Pakistan as Islamabad and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have failed to reach a staff-level agreement on a much-needed USD 1.1 billion bailout package aimed at preventing the country from going bankrupt.
Analysts believe that the current economic crisis in Pakistan is a culmination of decades of faulty policies, reported The Al Arabiya Post.
Pakistan is seeking a USD 7 billion bailout package from the IMF to prevent the collapse of the economy. While the visiting IMF delegation is asking for several reforms and compliance with its conditionality.
The IMF mission, led by Nathan Porter, began talks on January 31 with the Pakistan government represented by Finance Minister Ishaq Dar for the ninth review of the assistance package.
PM Sharif, while addressing an apex committee meeting in Peshawar following Monday’s mosque bombing that killed over 100 people, said, “As I speak, the IMF delegation is in Islamabad and they are giving Finance Minister Ishaq Dar and his team a tough time.”
Notably, the resource allocation pattern in Pakistan from one budget to another puts a disproportionate focus on populism and militarization. This has put an additional burden on its exchequer leading to an unsustainable fiscal gap, reported Al Arabiya Post.
Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said on February 3 that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was giving a “tough time” to his country over the restoration of stalled bailout package at a time of “unimaginable” crisis.
Shehbaz Sharif admitted that the country has no option but to accept the IMF conditionality. “You all know we are running short of resources,” Sharif said, adding the country was “facing an acute economic crisis”.
Moreover, the Pakistani rupee, which has been in a steep slide since last week, hit a record low against the US dollar. The Pakistani rupee fell by 1.9 per cent to a record low of 276.58 per dollar in the inter-bank market the same day, according to the Central Bank, reported Al Arabiya Post.
As the IMF bailout package is conditional on Pakistan implementing IMF suggested measures, its release would require Islamabad to take tough decisions.
After the first round of technical talks between the IMF team and the government concluded on February 4, Pak Prime Minister observed that the lender was imposing conditions that were “beyond our wildest dreams”.
The discussions covered details of expenditure and revenue performance to identify the policy measures- both revenue and non-revenue- that would have to be taken over the next four months of the current fiscal year. The Pak Prime Ministered, despite calling the IMF conditionality unimaginable acknowledged that the country had no choice but to implement the conditions.
It has been seen that Islamabad has a policy obduracy and inertia that prohibit it to shun its populist policies and take reform measures on debt, fiscal, trade and structural fronts to address its economic woes, reported Al Arabiya Post.
Analysts opine that the rocky road Pakistan is passing through is its own creation. In the first instance, a debt-dependent growth strategy is itself a sure recipe to fall into a debt trap, especially when industrial growth and diversification are limited and the export basket is primarily made up of primary goods.
The debt dependence has also eroded the sovereignty of Pakistan and the country’s economic and foreign policies are dictated by those who provide funds. Such dependence on external funding has impeded the structural transformation of the Pak economy and its indigenous growth impetus.
Secondly, an artificially designed threat perception in Pakistan created by the vested interests in Islamabad’s establishment has totally distorted the allocation of resources in the country giving undue emphasis on militarisation in the name of preparing for a threat that does not exist.
The third most remarkable flaw in Pakistan’s economic policy is a deliberate and foolhardy choice of missing the development opportunities generated by free trade, reported Al Arabiya Post.
While Pakistan has a good location to leverage the presence of two giant economies in its neighbourhood, it has opted to isolate one of them and sided with the other at the cost of huge losses in trade creation.
Not giving the Most Favoured Nation status to India and keeping the trade routes closed for direct trade is a self-defeating proposition.
Islamabad could no more avoid taking hard decisions. The situation continues to deteriorate. With only around USD 3.10 billion in foreign exchange reserves, which can only cover 18 days’ worth of imports, and a shortage of basic goods including food and medicine and ever-spiralling inflation, the choice to comply with the IMF conditionality would not be easy for Pakistan.
[ad_2]
#Tough #times #ahead #Pakistan #talks #IMF #fails
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

[ad_1]
Washington: Twitter and Tesla CEO Elon Musk on Sunday said that the past three months have been “extremely tough” as he “had to save Twitter from bankruptcy” while also fulfilling his duties in Tesla and SpaceX. Taking to his official Twitter handle, Musk said that the microblogging site continues to have challenges.
Elon Musk tweeted, “Last 3 months were extremely tough, as had to save Twitter from bankruptcy, while fulfilling essential Tesla & SpaceX duties. Wouldn’t wish that pain on anyone.
Twitter still has challenges, but is now trending to breakeven if we keep at it. Public support is much appreciated!”. He tweeted in response to The Wall Street Journal’s news article.
Musk lamented the company’s “massive drop in revenue” just one week after closing the USD 44 billion deal to buy Twitter in October, which he attributed to “activist groups pressuring advertisers,” Fox Business reported. Since then, he has made a number of changes on Twitter, as per the news report.
Elon Musk has reduced about half of Twitter’s staff, introduced a revamped microblogging site Blue subscription service and even auctioned off memorabilia from the company’s San Francisco headquarters, Fox Business reported. He defended the Twitter layoffs in November, stressing that the company was losing USD 4 million a day.
Recently, Twitter announced that it will start charging a fee to access its API, which developers use to create third-party services, as per the news report. Earlier on January 13, Musk revealed some of the changes that were set to be introduced in the microblogging platform from next week onwards. He wrote, “Bookmark button moving to tweet details page, fixing image length crop & other minor bug fixes next week.”
[ad_2]
#Musk #calls #months #tough #save #Twitter #bankruptcy
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

[ad_1]
“You’re jumping ahead in your own analysis,” Hochul said after an unrelated event in Albany. “You’re making an assumption that I have not stated to be factual that we’re going down a certain path. I recommend you don’t do that because you will all know everything you need to know in due process and due time.”
But as time ticks, Hochul appears to be facing a likely losing battle against progressives and unions who quashed LaSalle’s potential ascension as the state’s first Latino chief judge. Opponents said he issued some decisions as a judge that were anti-labor and anti-abortion. LaSalle said that’s not true.
After the Senate Judiciary Committee rejected her pick, Hochul argued that LaSalle needed a full vote in the 63-member Senate. Senators have said no: The Judiciary Committee’s vote is where the issue ends.
Legal experts are split on whether Hochul would win a lawsuit over the matter.
Jerry Goldfeder, a preeminent Democratic election lawyer, wrote Monday that the state constitution indicates a governor’s nominee for the Court of Appeals needs a Senate vote, saying it “requires advice and consent by ‘the Senate,’ not one of its committees.”
Others have suggested “advice and consent” can end with the committee.
Even a successful lawsuit to bring LaSalle’s nomination to the floor would put Hochul back in the same place: She is not expected to have enough votes among Senate Democrats to confirm him, meaning he would simply be rejected again.
Hochul wouldn’t indulge that scenario.
“As the governor, it is my prerogative to do what’s best for the people of the state of New York after a thoughtful analysis and in consultation — and I assure you, that is my guiding star,” she said.
Sen. Jamaal Bailey was the only Democrat on the Judiciary Committee who voted to move LaSalle’s nomination without recommendation — meaning he was willing to have it come to the floor, but also didn’t vote in favor of him. Bailey said he remains “comfortable” with his vote, but did not weigh in on what the future holds.
“The committee decided what it decided. I think that ultimately the next decisions need to be determined by the governor and the leadership about what takes place,” Bailey, a Bronx Democrat, said.
LaSalle’s supporters, including former chief judge Jonathan Lippman, have made several arguments challenging the legitimacy of the committee decision, including asserting that the formal letter of rejection from Senate Democrats signed by Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins should have been signed by Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado, who is the Senate president, per the constitution.
Stewart-Cousins dismissed that argument, along with the notion LaSalle deserved additional Senate consideration following his five-hour hearing last Wednesday.
“I’m not arguing about who signed the letter or not,” she told reporters Tuesday. “What happened was that there were not enough votes to bring the nominee to the floor. So therefore the nominee did not go through.”
Stewart-Cousins said she was “not concerned” a stand off over a potential lawsuit would derail coming budget negotiations between the governor and Legislature, saying both parties have shown they “continue to interact on a professional level.”
“I have a good relationship with the governor,” she said. “We all do. So we can disagree, but that doesn’t mean we can’t do the work that people sent us to do.”
But asked whether she’d talked to Hochul personally since LaSalle’s rejection and its fallout, Stewart-Cousins said she has not.
There are other options for Hochul.
She could simply withdraw LaSalle’s nomination and pick from among the other six candidates recommended by the state Commission on Judicial Nomination — giving her a new shot at winning Senate approval after a number of lawmakers indicated support for a few others on the list.
Or the Court of Appeals could rule it doesn’t have a chief judge and ask the commission to go through a monthslong process of selecting new candidates for Hochul to consider. Right now, the court has six members, which for a prolonged period could hurt its ability to reach consensus.
Again, Hochul dismissed the turmoil and stuck by LaSalle: “I chose the best person from the list of seven.”
[ad_2]
#Hochul #faces #tough #choices #rejected #chief #judge #pick #good
( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

[ad_1]

To evaluate the public service delivery in the government offices including Schools and Hospitals, District Administration Doda under the Directions of DC Doda Vishesh Paul Mahajan conducted inspection of all the government offices, schools and hospitals across the district. ADM (ADC Doda) inspected the offices in Doda town, while ADM (ADC Bhaderwah) inspected offices in the Bhaderwah town. All SDMs and Tehsildars visited the government establishments of their respective jurisdiction.
The officers conducted special inspections to check the punctuality and effectiveness of public services delivery. ADC Doda when contacting said that the inspections shall be a regular activity in future and maintained that administration is committed to give best services to its citizens especially during ensuing winter.
DC Doda while speaking on the surprise inspections said that effective, efficient, transparent, and timely public service delivery is desired from all the government officers and officials to which no laxity or diligence shall be tolerated.
(We don’t allow anyone to copy content. For Copyright or Use of Content related questions, visit here.)
To support our Independent Journalism
[ad_2]
#Doda #Admin #tough #Conducts #surprise #inspection #offices #district #ahead #ensuing #winter #Chenab #Times