London: A senior Conservative peer has accused Suella Braverman of using “racist rhetoric” after the home secretary singled out British-Pakistani men as being of special concern in relation to child sexual abuse cases, the media reported.
Sayeeda Warsi, the first Asian person to chair the Tory party, said Conservatives cannot “use the pigment in their skin as a defence mechanism to say they are not racist”, adding “brown people can be racist too”, The Guardian reported.
Warsi said Braverman’s remarks have “got to stop” and called on Rishi Sunak to send a “really strong message that this kind of rhetoric… has got to stop”.
“I think the prime minister has to get a really strong message that this kind of rhetoric, whether it’s on small boats, whether it’s the stuff she was saying on the weekend which is not based on evidence, not nuanced, not kind of explanatory in any way, it has got to stop.”
She added: “I don’t think any of my colleagues can use the pigment in their skin as some sort of a defence mechanism to say they are not racist. You know brown people can be racist too”, The Guardian reported.
Asked if she was calling the home secretary racist, she said: “I am calling her rhetoric racist. I am.”
Albie Amankona, a Tory campaigner who co-founded the race relations group Conservatives Against Racism For Equality, said on Twitter: “I don’t understand how it’s possible for one person, Suella Braverman, to find themselves almost weekly, at the centre of so much racial insensitivity. I’ve said it before, there is something not right there.”
Warsi’s comments follow letters sent to Sunak calling for him to act over Braverman’s rhetoric, including from the British Pakistan Foundation, which accused the home secretary of seeking to portray all British-Pakistani men in a “divisive and dangerous way”.
London: British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Sunday sacked one of his Cabinet ministers and Conservative Party chairman, Nadhim Zahawi, after he was found to have been in serious breach of the Ministerial Code.
Zahawi, who was a minister without portfolio as the chief of the governing Tory party, had faced fierce pressure in recent days to quit over questions about his finances after it emerged that he had agreed a penalty settlement with His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) department.
Sunak had ordered an independent investigation into the Iraqi-born former Chancellor’s tax affairs amid growing Opposition demands for him to sack Zahawi.
His independent ethics adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, submitted his assessment on whether the HMRC settlement amounted to a breach of the ministerial code.
“When I became Prime Minister last year, I pledged that the government I lead would have integrity, professionalism and accountability at every level,” writes Sunak in his letter to Zahawi, released by Downing Street.
“Following the completion of the independent adviser’s investigation the findings of which he has shared with us both it is clear that there has been a serious breach of the Ministerial Code. As a result, I have informed you of my decision to remove you from your position in His Majesty’s government,” he said.
He added that Zahawi should be “extremely proud” of his “wide-ranging achievements in government over the last five years”, particularly crediting his “successful oversight of the COVID-19 vaccine procurement and deployment programme”.
In the correspondence to Sunak, also released by Downing Street, Magnus said his overall judgement was that “Mr Zahawi’s conduct as a minister has fallen below the high standards that, as Prime Minister, you rightly expect from those who serve in your government”.
Earlier this week, Zahawi said he welcomed the investigation and looked forward to “explaining the facts of this issue” to Magnus the UK Prime Minister’s Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests.
“In order to ensure the independence of this process, you will understand that it would be inappropriate to discuss this issue any further, as I continue my duties as chairman of the Conservative and Unionist Party,” Zahawi said at the time.
The minister has insisted he “acted properly throughout” and any tax error was due to being “careless” and not deliberate.
The Opposition parties and even some members of the Conservative Party had called for Zahawi to step down as Tory chairman amid too many unanswered questions.
In his report, dated 29 January, Magnus notes: “Given the nature of the investigation by HMRC, which started prior to his appointment as secretary of state for education on 15 September 2021, I consider that by failing to declare HMRC’s ongoing investigation before July 2022 despite the ministerial declaration of interests form including specific prompts on tax affairs and HMRC investigations and disputes Mr Zahawi failed to meet the requirement to declare any interests which might be thought to give rise to a conflict.”
He adds: “I also conclude that, in the appointments process for the governments formed in September 2022 and October 2022, Mr Zahawi failed to disclose relevant information in this case the nature of the investigation and its outcome in a penalty at the time of his appointment, including to cabinet office officials who support that process.
“Without knowledge of that information, the Cabinet Office was not in a position to inform the appointing Prime Minister.”
Hell is a teargassed scrubland crawling with infectious disease. Hell is toddlers scavenging to survive. Hell is a refugee camp in Calais.
Each time I visit, I learn more about the diabolical conditions that human beings are forced to endure in the camp. Having fled the horrors of war, environmental disaster and destitution, refugees there have sacrificed everything to find safety. Instead,they die slowly in a hopeless wasteland. Muddied tents provide the only shelter from the freezing cold. Children beg for water contaminated by faeces, as rats scurry into people’s makeshift homes.
The human shrieks of a rodent-sighting are nothing compared to the wails of infants longing for their mother’s embrace. One of the main sites of separation is Calais itself. Since the destruction of the “jungle” in 2016, the French police have enforced a policy of “zero-fixation points” to prevent refugees settling elsewhere. Evictions are carried out daily; tents, blankets, identity papers, mobile phones, clothes and medicines are confiscated or destroyed.
During this campaign of harassment, refugees are regularly beaten, shot with rubber bullets and choked with teargas. Human Rights Observers– an independent watchdog in northern France – told me they’ve witnessed French authorities urinating on people’s belongings. In the melée, mothers are routinely separated from their children. It’s often the last time they see each other, at least alive.
It may be French authorities who assault the refugees, but it is the UK government that gives them the batons and bullets. In 2021, the UK paid £55m for French border patrols to clamp down on border crossings; the money goes on barbed wire, CCTV and detection technology. Absolving itself of any international or moral responsibility toward refugees, the UK is paying France to criminalise them instead.
The police have the same desire as the French and British governments: for refugees to disappear. Even before Suella Braverman took office, the UK had one of the lowest rates of asylum approvals in western Europe. Under Braverman’s plans, anybody who crosses the Channel would be banned from claiming asylum in the UK altogether.
For most people, being told that their plans violate the 1951 UN refugee convention and the European convention on human rights might compel them to reconsider. Not Braverman. We need to breach these conventions, she says, to finally crack down on people smugglers. She knows the truth: by refusing to provide safe routes, the governmentforces desperate human beings to search for alternative, more dangerous means of transit.Far from taking on human traffickers, it is her policy that creates the market for them in the first place.
Undeterred by international law, Braverman is determined to fulfil a dream: to witness flights sending refugees to Rwanda. On the plane to Rwanda is Britain’s colonial baggage; from this country’s previous role in the slave trade to its current role in the arms trade (most notably in arming the Saudi-led war in Yemen), Britain bears culpability for the economic and political roots of displacement.
By criminalising the very refugees they create, successive governments have handed over their international responsibilities to the voluntary sector. Calais Appeal, an umbrella group encompassing eight organisations, provides humanitarian assistance to those in need. From Refugee Community Kitchen (which seeks to “serve food with dignity”) to Project Play (which provides displaced children with a space to rest, learn and play), dedicated staff and volunteers fill a gap that the French and British authorities have callously created.
I asked how we can best support them. One is through donations. Another is to amplify what they’ve been saying all along: safe routes save lives. We can stop people drowning in the sea tomorrow – by enabling them to come here safely by plane, train or ferry. Instead of bankrolling the persecution of refugees trying to reach our shores, the UK should be playing a leading role in renewing international commitments to the rights of displaced people around the world.
The only way we can defeat a politics of hatred is with a politics of compassion. The Tories’ assault on refugees must be opposed – not because it lacks fiscal prudence, but because it lacks a basic regard for human life. Refugees are not political pawns to be debated and disempowered. They are human beings, whose hopes and dreams should not be sacrificed in calculations of electability. When looking to justify an alternative policy toward refugees, surely their humanity is enough.
We need an immigration system grounded in compassion, dignity and care. One that brings an end to the poverty, environmental collapse and wars that are displacing people around the world. One that stops spewing the hateful rhetoric of “invasions” and instead says loudly: refugees are welcome here. As Warsan Shire writes in her poem Home, “no one puts their children in a boat unless the water is safer than the land”. For some, a politics of pragmatism is more important than a politics of principle. Maybe a trip to Calais would change their mind.
Jeremy Corbyn MP is a former leader of the Labour party
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
[ad_2]
#doubt #hateful #effects #Tory #migrant #policy #Calais #Ive #Jeremy #Corbyn
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )
Nadhim Zahawi’s position as Conservative party chair is “untenable” after reports he paid a penalty as part of a seven-figure tax settlement, Labour has said.
The former chancellor, who attends cabinet meetings, has faced pressure in parliament and the media after it emerged he agreed to pay millions to HMRC in December after a settlement with the tax agency.
Labour’s deputy leader, Angela Rayner, called for an explanation on Saturday after the Guardian reported that Zahawi paid a 30% penalty, taking the estimated total tax bill to more than £4.8m.
She told BBC Breakfast: “The fact that Nadhim hasn’t been out on the airwaves explaining himself, to me, adds insult to injury, especially given that he called this smears at the time and sent legal letters to those that asked questions legitimately about it.
“And when you’re the chancellor, who is in charge of the tax affairs of the UK, and you’ve got a wealth of that nature, you would be expected to know about your tax affairs or to seek that advice at the time, as opposed to not paying those taxes and having to pay a penalty notice.
“I believe his position is untenable. If he’s lied and misled the public and HMRC regarding his tax affairs then I think his position is untenable.”
Earlier this week, Labour called for an inquiry into whether Zahawi broke the ministerial code or misled the public over his tax affairs.
The shadow chancellor, Rachel Reeves, also called for Zahawi to go.
Speaking at a Fabian Society conference on Saturday, she said: “A few months ago … he was chancellor of the exchequer and responsible for Britain’s tax affairs and tax collection, and we now find that he wasn’t so keen to pay himself.
“So if the prime minister wants to stick by his commitment for integrity, honesty and professionalism, he should do the right thing and sack Nadhim Zahawi.”
The deputy prime minister, Dominic Raab, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme Zahawi had been “transparent about the fact all the tax has been paid”.
“I don’t know the full details of Nadhim’s tax affairs because they are personal,” he said. “What I do know is that he’s made very clear that he’s paid all of his tax, that he’s got no outstanding tax liabilities or nothing further due, and he’s obviously engaged with HMRC to achieve that.”
Asked if Zahawi should give a statement to the Commons, Raab added: “That’s a matter for him but what I’d emphasise is he has been transparent about the fact that all the tax has been paid and he doesn’t have any tax outstanding.”
Penalties are applied if someone does not pay the correct tax at the right time.
A source familiar with the payment said a penalty was triggered as a result of a non-payment of capital gains tax due after the sale of shares in YouGov, the polling company Zahawi co-founded.
He could have been subject to larger penalties had he not reached a settlement towards the end of last year, they claimed.
The YouGov shares were held through Balshore Investments, a Gibraltar-registered family trust, from which Zahawi has previously denied benefiting. YouGov has described Balshore Investments as “a family trust of Nadhim Zahawi”.
The former chancellor has said “he does not have, and never has had, an interest in Balshore Investments and he is not a beneficiary”. Zahawi founded YouGov in 2000 and Balshore had sold its stake in the business by 2018.
Last summer news reports emerged about Zahawi’s financial affairs, including that the HMRC was looking at his taxes. At the time, Zahawi described such reports as “smears”. It is understood that after those reports a representative for Zahawi approached HMRC to discuss his tax position.
[ad_2]
#Nadhim #Zahawis #position #Tory #chair #untenable #Labour
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )