Tag: The News Caravan

  • Alex de Minaur surges into Australian Open last 16 and a date with Djokovic

    Alex de Minaur surges into Australian Open last 16 and a date with Djokovic

    [ad_1]

    The quarter-finals of a grand slam has been for Alex de Minaur what platform nine and three-quarters is for mere humans – impossible to get in. Aside from last year’s US Open, when he made it that far in a draw reduced by Covid 19, the fourth round has been the Australian’s ceiling.

    He is on the verge again at Melbourne Park, after making the fourth round here for a second consecutive year, except that the draw has handed him Novak Djokovic. And he does not think the nine-time Australian Open champion’s hamstring problem will make his assignment any easier.

    “Look, I’m not going to read into too much of that injury,” he said. “Ultimately he’s one of the best players in the world, and I’m just going to have to take it to him and not shy away from the occasion. I’m going to make sure I make it as tough as I can, and just bring the recent experience I’ve had on court and how I’ve been feeling.”

    De Minaur, the 22nd seed and Australia’s only remaining men’s hope after Alexei Popyrin’s loss to the American Ben Shelton, wasted no time surging into the second week on Saturday, dispatching Benjamin Bonzi in straight sets. The 23-year-old broke his French opponent seven times on Rod Laver Arena in a regulation 7-6 (7-0), 6-2, 6-1 victory lasting only two hours and eight minutes.

    “I’m very happy, I can’t lie,” De Minaur said. “Honestly, as a kid, this is what you train for, to be playing on this court in front of you guys on the biggest stages in the world. Every time I get out here I’ve got to pinch myself.”

    De Minaur has never faced Djokovic, but he has speed on his side against a player who was visibly hampered by injury in his win over Grigor Dimitrov and afterwards described De Minaur as “one of the quickest players on the tour”.

    He also has morale-boosting form on his side, having beaten reigning champion Rafael Nadal in this month’s United Cup and last year’s runner-up, Daniil Medvedev, in November. “These are the matches you want to be playing,” he said. “You don’t want a walkover into the final of a slam. You want to be playing the best in the world. That’s what I’ve got.

    “I’m going to probably have the best in the world in front of me, and I’m ready for the battle. I want to take it to them and show what I’m made of in the biggest of stages and just test myself out there and really take it to them.”

    [ad_2]
    #Alex #Minaur #surges #Australian #Open #date #Djokovic
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Ditch gym fees: the best ways to get fit at no (or little) cost

    Ditch gym fees: the best ways to get fit at no (or little) cost

    [ad_1]

    If you want to get fit, joining a gym is often the starting point but the financial pressures caused by the cost of living crisis mean that for many Britons, committing to another big monthly expense is simply not an option.

    Indeed, a study issued this month found that more than a third of consumers have given up fitness memberships for money reasons. Generation Z and millennials were hardest hit, with half of 25- to 34-year-olds cancelling memberships, rising to 56% for 18- to 24-year-olds, according to the poll by the workspace firm IWG.

    But the appetite for getting fit and participating in activities is still there: in December, sports and outdoor retailers had their strongest month since last March, with sales of gear and equipment up 3.5%, according to Barclays data published this week.

    The Barclays report says almost a third of those seeking cost-effective ways to start new resolutions are looking to take up “free” forms of exercise, such as running or following YouTube workouts. Here, we look at how to get fit at no or low cost.

    Look to your council

    Councils offer people low-cost access to sports clubs and facilities. A lot of what’s available is not means-tested. Some of these services will be free, or have a minimal charge. For example, Southwark council in London allows residents to sign up for a free swim pass that can be used at many leisure centres in the borough on Fridays and at weekends. Sign-up is usually required before attending, as new members will have to provide proof of address.

    Certain groups will also be entitled to additional classes and clubs. For instance, in Northern Ireland, Mid Ulster’s “active lifestyle programme” is running £1 classes, including yoga, water aerobics and strength and balance. Some sessions are open to everyone but they primarily focus on children and young people with disabilities, new mothers and older people.

    Welsh councils, including Conwy, Swansea and Wrexham, have a 60+ active leisure scheme providing cheap access to local facilities for the over-60s. This includes a free initial period.

    Seek out initiatives

    If you are set on taking up a specific sport, it is worth searching for initiatives funded by Sport England, Sportscotland, Sport Wales and Sport Northern Ireland.

    Tennis clubs are particularly keen on helping new members into the sport. Tennis For Free offers sessions nationwide with all equipment provided (in most cases, classes will be starting up again in the spring). Clubs are also worth approaching directly.

    Meanwhile, Skate Nottingham runs free weekly skateboarding classes for those aged seven to 14.

    Someone on a skateboard
    Does your child want to learn skateboard skills? Photograph: Lenscap/Alamy

    Some commercial brands also run free sessions. Sweaty Betty offers classes in-store, including yoga, barre and Hiit (high-intensity interval training), although you will need to sign up for a free Sweaty Betty membership. Locations include Islington, Brighton, York and Bluewater in Kent.

    Brave the outdoors

    Wrap up warm and head to your local green space for some free, or low-cost, exercise.

    Keep an eye out for public table tennis setups and outdoor gyms, as well as basketball and tennis courts. These are often free to use, although with some there may be a small fee, usually via the council’s website. You will typically have to take your own equipment.

    If you are bold enough to give open water swimming a go, you could save a fortune in swim passes all year. Swimming on the coast, or in swimming ponds, is largely free, although some of the famous ponds, such as Hampstead in north London, charge a small fee (£4.25 or £2.55 for concessions in the case of Hampstead). Outdoor swimming groups and free information can be found at the Outdoor Swimming Society.

    “Swimming is so cheap,” confirms Kate Rew, the society’s founder. “You don’t need any gear – it’s perfectly acceptable to jump in wearing a T-shirt and pants. You can move on to more gear – but none of it is necessary.”

    The not-for-profit sports organisation Our Parks is also offering free classes at various parks around the country. Sessions include yoga, dance, pilates and fitness. However, if you are not able to get to the park, they also have a variety of live online sessions.

    A wild swimming women’s group take a dip at Hampstead Heath ponds.
    A wild swimming women’s group take a dip at Hampstead Heath ponds. Photograph: Hollie Fernando/Getty Images

    Another option is parkrun, which hosts a free weekly 5km run on Saturday mornings at lots of UK parks. There’s also a 2km junior parkrun for children aged four to 14 on Sunday mornings.

    For those wanting to go at a slower pace, the Ramblers has hundreds of free walking routes across the country, and also hosts free Wellbeing Walks.

    Go virtual

    Virtual classes via apps, YouTube and fitness platforms are probably the most cost-efficient option, depending on how much space and self-motivation you have.

    The free NHS Couch to 5K running podcast is a popular option. NHS Fitness Studio also has free exercise videos for pilates and yoga, strength and resistance, and aerobics.

    Fitness class at a gym
    Gyms often offer free trials at the start of a year. Photograph: Sergio Azenha/Alamy

    YouTube has a plethora of free-access sports coaching videos and exercise sessions to get involved in, regardless of whether you are hoping to take up boxercise, Hiit or Zumba.

    The Better at Home app also provides 600 virtual free exercise classes.

    Take up gym trials

    There is often increased interest in gyms in January, and, consequently, gyms often offer free trials at the start of the year. Use this time to think about whether you really will commit to regularly doing weight training and cardio, or attending classes. Some gyms also offer a free personal training session.

    If you can’t see a free trial advertised, contact the team and ask if you can try before buying. If that fails, ask friends if they have a referral, or a free pass to a nearby gym.

    If you do pursue a membership, check the contract carefully to ensure you are not locked into an unaffordable long-term commitment. Remember that local leisure centres will often be cheaper, although they may have fewer facilities.

    Meanwhile, if you have a health condition, you may be entitled to a free pass. For instance, Everyone Active offers a free gym pass to anyone with Parkinson’s.

    Get the gear

    Avoid investing in expensive gear if you feel that your commitment to a new fitness regime could waver.

    In the short-term, ask friends and family if they have old equipment, such as footballs, weights and badminton rackets, that you could borrow. The chances are someone you know invested in some, motivated by new year goals, and never used them again.

    The ball manufacturer Alive and Kicking has scores of “football libraries” across the country that enable locals to borrow footballs for free.

    Sites such as eBay, Vinted and Preloved Sports offer secondhand sportswear and equipment. In many cases the items will have never been worn.

    However, be cautious about buying certain items. For instance, it may be dangerous to buy a secondhand horse-riding helmet or other protective gear.

    If you are in Scotland, your child could be entitled to sports gear via the nationwide Kit for All scheme. In Aberdeen, for example, you can apply for sportswear via Aberdeen city schools.

    For those after bigger purchases, such as a bike or an e-bike, there may be payment schemes to help. The nationwide salary sacrifice scheme Bike2Work saves on tax by enabling you to pay via your employer. There’s a calculator on its website to work out how much you could save.

    Certain people may also be entitled to an equipment grant.

    [ad_2]
    #Ditch #gym #fees #ways #fit #cost
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Everyone Else Burns: this great new British comedy will make you laugh again and again

    Everyone Else Burns: this great new British comedy will make you laugh again and again

    [ad_1]

    Religions famously enjoy being made fun of. That’s why [very extended paragraph deleted on legal recommendation]! Don’t we? We all do that. But I am having a lot of fun with Everyone Else Burns, the new Channel 4 comedy (Monday, 10pm) that centres on a hyper-religious family in Greater Manchester. There’s a lot to like here – the Sex Education-style 70s-tinged aesthetic, the gloopy storytelling where episodes shrug into one another, a supporting cast of absolute British comedy bangers – but the main thing is: it remembers to be funny. Again and again. And – and I hope you’re ready for a rare balancing act – never punches down at religion. And lo, there was a miracle.

    Let’s start with Simon Bird, the family’s bowl-cutted patriarch. As Will in The Inbetweeners and Adam in Friday Night Dinner he was excellent but essentially played the same character, which is “Person who says: ‘What on Earth are you doing?’ whenever someone else does something odd”. Now, he’s the freak: as David, he gets his family up for punishing 2am apocalyptic fire drills, is hated by the church he loves and doesn’t understand why his wife and daughter are drifting away from him. It’s been a while – I’d probably put it around Mark from Peep Show – but one of comedy’s great characters is “Man who is ruining his life by his dedication to diligently following the rules”, and Bird’s David fits neatly into that fine tradition.

    The fear with a show like this – where the pitch is: “What if a family were weird?” – is it becomes one-note quite early on: here’s the dad being weird, look; here’s the mum being weird. What if the daughter were normal with a hint of weird? Well, then the son has to be doubly weird. And yes, there is a little of that. But the family’s performances – Amy James-Kelly’s knotted-brow teenage daughter Rachel, slowly pulling away from the idea of a religion that forbids caffeine and TV; youngest son Aaron, who keeps making crayon renderings of gruesome visions of hell, played eerily well by Harry Connor; and the brilliant Kate O’Flynn, who plays the yearning-for-more wife Fiona so well you figure they must have had to rejig the script to give her all the best lines (“David, if you’re going to scream you should do it into a pillow at home, it’s better for the kids”) – tamp down any threat of that. You’ve got two options for a comedy, really: reflect the reality of life in all its painful squirming glory; or invent a weird world and let weirdness reign supreme. Everyone Else Burns lands between the two, and feels bright and original and new as a result.

    Simon Bird with Kadiff Kirwan as Andrew in Everyone Else Burns.
    Simon Bird with Kadiff Kirwan as Andrew in Everyone Else Burns. Photograph: James Stack/ Channel 4

    The supporting cast are another accomplishment: Morgana Robinson as the cheerfully straightforward “That’s a sin, is it?” neighbour; Lolly Adefope as a flatly northern, always vaping teacher; Al Roberts as a sort of Prof Brian Cox/youth pastor hybrid who’s addicted to cola; and I’ve never not enjoyed the wild turmoil Liam Williams brings to the screen. But Kadiff Kirwan is the standout: his beaming nice-guy charm contrasts so perfectly with Bird’s always-ready-to-escalate evangelist.

    It would have been easy to bog Everyone Else Burns down with explaining theology then explaining how theology is wrong – but in the episodes I’ve seen religion is, well, not really in it. There are scenes at a nameless denomination of church, and the stringent but abstract scriptures are the motivation behind a lot of David’s more erratic behaviours but, at its heart, Everyone Else Burns is a family comedy that just happens to be flavoured by religion, rather than revolving round it.

    If you’ll allow me a semi-bizarre zig into patriotism – I have arranged an RAF flyover to coincide with the exact moment you read this, don’t worry – there’s something oddly stirring about watching a great new British comedy. Everyone Else Burns does everything we’re good at without any syrupy tropes – just crackling dialogue over a soft-sided story that makes sense. Sometimes it’s easy to forget how good we are at this and ignore a new release for whatever glossy thing the streaming giants have put out this week – why yes, I am still annoyed that I watched Glass Onion! Thank you for asking actually! – but to miss Everyone Else Burns is to miss a rare treat.

    [ad_2]
    #Burns #great #British #comedy #laugh
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • ‘If I’d had a therapist, do you think any of this would have happened?’: Pamela Anderson on being chewed up and spat out by fame

    ‘If I’d had a therapist, do you think any of this would have happened?’: Pamela Anderson on being chewed up and spat out by fame

    [ad_1]

    Right before Covid hit, Pamela Anderson was returning home to Canada from Marseille in the south of France. Not just any old place in Canada, but Ladysmith on Vancouver Island and the white clapboard house where she grew up. “Scene of the crime” she calls it. In France she’d been living with footballer Adil Rami for a year, but she’d had her heart broken. He wasn’t just explosively jealous, she learned, but still in a relationship with a woman with whom he had children. Just date someone normal, she thought, the spectre of former rock-star husbands Tommy Lee and Kid Rock perhaps kicking doors in the back of her mind. Renovations were beginning on her new-old home and Anderson’s eye alighted on one of the contractors. Normal. A year later and 25lb heavier from their nightly beer sessions, she sat on the sofa willing – desperately willing – her fifth husband to say something interesting. “Oh boy,” she sighs now. “Normal was the worst.”

    So, another divorce under her belt, Anderson swore off men and took a long, hard look at her life. She went into cupboards and attics, emptying them of memories – journals, letters, news and talkshow footage, home videotapes (as we know, she’s an inveterate taper) – and tried to map her life. What happened to that tomboy kid she once was, with the freckles and the dove-grey eyes? Why did her life seem to run in crazy chicanes around toxic relationships? Not even she could make sense of her haphazard career trajectory.

    Few need reminding that Anderson came to the public’s attention by way of Playboy magazine and TV soap Baywatch (1992-97), or that in 1996 stolen private footage of her and husband Tommy Lee having sex went viral on the fledgling world wide web, netting $77m (£50m) in 12 months for the illegal distributors. Anderson never benefited one cent. Instead, her career plummeted, her marriage foundered and she became public hussy No 1. At times she thought: “Why do they hate me so much? Why do these grown men hate me?”

    But also: why did she play ball? Why did she put up with the ritual humiliation? Why did she sit under the studio lights time and again, comedians making the same lame joke for 10, 15, 25 years? (Alan Carr in 2010: “It’s fun being screwed, isn’t it, Pammy? I’ve seen the tape.”) What took her from one arguably bad decision (say, Big Brother 2011) to the next (German Big Brother 2013)?

    There were plenty of actual bad boyfriends, too. “After the tape, it wasn’t like I was attracting men who had the best of intentions.” In 2006, she married and filed for divorce from Kid Rock. In 2007, she married and left poker player Rick Salomon: “He ended up being a big drug addict. We found a crack pipe in the Christmas tree.” (He still denies this, claiming it was somebody else’s.) She remarried Salomon in 2014 after he “got clean” and divorced him again in 2015. She says she would have married her friend the activist Julian Assange if it would have got him out of jail. In early 2020 she married an old suitor, Jon Peters, but later denied the union was ever legal; in December that year she married “normal” Dan Hayhurst but left him soon after. She completely abandoned herself, she thinks now. “It’s a form of suicide.” If it weren’t for her sons Brandon and Dylan Lee, she says, she wouldn’t be here. “Over the last 20 years, I went missing. MIA even to myself. I was drinking, I was trying drugs – so not me. I just went off the rails.” She was “difficult” at work. “Unmanageable, they called me.” Did she have therapy? “Are you kidding? If I’d had a therapist, do you think any of this would have happened?”

    So, in January 2022, she gave herself a goal: “Don’t meet any men. Just focus … just be in love with myself.” She pauses. “Believe me, I’ve been restless. I’ve thought: ‘Well, maybe I should just call …?’ Then: ‘No.’”

    Today, she’s 12 months clean of men, so to speak, and has plenty to show for the time in recovery. In addition to stepping on to Broadway as Roxie in Chicago last April, she has written her memoirs, Love, Pamela, and encouraged by her sons has made a revealing documentary about her life, Pamela, a Love Story, which is what brings me to her beachfront hotel in Santa Monica. Anderson is digging in her bag for throat sweets and a honey and lemon lollipop (“not vegan, I’m afraid”), expressing maternal concern over my hoarse voice. No protest can stop her loading the table in front of me with hot drinks and vegetable sticks. “Do we have vitamin C?” she asks her assistant.

    Pamela Anderson appears on stage for her curtain call Broadway debut playing Roxie Hart in ‘Chicago’ Pamela Anderson’s ‘Chicago’ Broadway debut, New York, USA - 12 Apr 2022
    As Roxie Hart in Chicago last year. Photograph: Photo Image Press/Rex/Shutterstock

    The hair is instantly recognisable (“Scandinavian Blonde $5 box”), though a little warmer than the lightning flash of Baywatch days. The voice has the soft buoyancy of Marilyn Monroe – who she references in our photoshoot – and there’s that toughness, undercut with wit and a mischievous vulnerability that reminds me somehow of Dolly Parton. The forerunners for her Baywatch look were Brigitte Bardot, Jayne Mansfield, Jean Harlow; it’s the male fantasy prototype that stretches back to Botticelli’s Venus, with her prodigious hair, pert boobs and oyster shell. Anderson took the cat’s eyes, pencil brows and the Marie Antionette hair-stack and gave it some extra fire: something ravenous, uncut and peculiarly 1990s. Her story is about love addiction, sure, but also of living on the frontline of that era.

    In case anyone is still on the fence about how toxic it was for women in the public eye in that decade, Anderson’s story lays it bare. Here’s an early exchange between young Anderson and an interviewer on NBC: “I’ve never sat across from an interview subject before and said, ‘May we talk briefly about your breasts?’” Here’s Larry King: “Have you ever had work done?” Anderson: “Why, yes, these are implants.” King: “Oh, they are?” Anderson laughs: a mix of exasperation and embarrassment. King, aggressive: “Are they, or aren’t they?” Anderson, sighing: “Yes, they are.”

    Here’s an exchange with a paparazzo outside the Viper Rooms at 2am the first time she went out after the birth of her son Brandon in 1996. Anderson: “How dare you spray fucking pepper spray [at me].” Pap: “You’re drunk, sweetie. Where’s your child this time of the morning?” Shouting: “Where. Is. Your. Baby?” Anderson: “With my mother, you fucking asshole.”

    After the tape was stolen, things got darker still. She repeatedly told her “friend” Jay Leno in 1996 that his jokes about the tape were “not funny”: “This is devastating to us.” But Leno was not listening. No one was listening. Anderson was visibly upset, but stayed plucky. It’s as if she believes that if she keeps telling the truth, keeps being her nice, funny, sweet self, people will check themselves. And what were her alternatives if she wanted to get on with her career and survive?

    When it became clear no one was interested in moving on, that the typecast was eternal, Anderson tried something else. She’d take the insults, the caricaturing, she’d take them with a big bold smile, but she wouldn’t take the money. In 2005, Comedy Central asked her to do a Roast. “I said I would do it but only if they gave $250,000 to Peta [People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals].” She was introduced thus: “Thank you for agreeing to get fucked on camera one last time.” The cartoon had taken over.


    Pamela Anderson was 22, with scrunch-dried hair and a tiny waist, when she was spotted at a Canadian football game by a Labatt’s Beer scout and made into their Blue Zone Girl. Back then, there was something unnameable and natural in her charm that read as simultaneously ordinary and, to a certain type of man, pure dripping sex. In Los Angeles, Playboy’s picture editor Marilyn Grabowski came across her image, stubbed out her cigarette and picked up the telephone.

    In Vancouver, Anderson was working in a tanning salon and living with a photographer called Michael. A previous boyfriend had thrown her out of a moving car, but Michael was a cheat. “When you see your boyfriend washing his penis in the sink, that’s a sign that they’re probably having an affair,” she says, deadpan. “I wrote it down: ‘Washing penis in the sink: suspicious.’” On hearing the word Playboy, Michael “ran into the kitchen and threw a tray of silverware at my head”.

    A young Pamela Anderson as the Labatt’s Blue Zone Girl
    As the Labatt’s Blue Zone Girl. Photograph: Netflix

    She arrived in LA, her first time on a plane, and at the Playboy mansion she was whisked past 15ft portraits of naked women and into “beauty”, where her hair was put in tinfoil and her toes “rubbed and polished”. She had to be coaxed out of her underwear, “which I was hanging on to for dear life”, because wardrobe for her first shoot was a boater, school blazer and tie, and nothing else. Afterwards, she threw up.

    The mansion was heaving with actors, musicians, “philanthropists”, artists. She spied Tony Curtis, Scott Baio, James Caan, Sean Penn and Jack Nicholson alongside “beautiful women in long silk gowns, Monique St Pierre with cropped hair like Michelle Pfeiffer”. Standing there in her acid-wash jeans, Nirvana T-shirt and “those socks with the balls on the back”, Anderson thought: how can I be more like them? Kimberley Hefner confided: “You know they all have surgery?” “I was like: ‘Really? Where do I sign up?’ Not a lot of thinking went into that decision,” Anderson says, regretful. “Not a lot of thinking went into anything.”

    Try as I might – in person and follow-up emails – I cannot get Anderson to condemn Hugh Hefner as a dirty old pervert: one who played a founding role in the industrialisation of “glamour” model exploitation. Anderson is loyal to a fault. She views Playboy as an academy of sorts. She believes it helped young women, some of whom – possibly many, “I can only guess” ­– were escaping really bad stuff at home. She is generous, even after saying Hef would order them to get naked in the “grotto” – Playboy’s overheated pool – because “clothes lint gets in the filters”. “He was the first gentleman I ever met. The first person who spoke that way: ‘Darling, darling.’ The smoking jackets, the black tie; it was mysterious and theatrical. I’d never been anywhere where you wore a suit.” Plus, he offered to pay her properly: $15,000 to be the centrefold in February 1990.

    Pamela Anderson, looking over her left shoulder, arms round herself, in black dress against white background, December 2022
    ‘Not a lot of thinking went into the decision to have surgery. Not a lot of thinking went into anything.’ Photograph: Dylan Coulter/The Guardian

    Of the time in general, she says: “I was pretty naive.” But as her memoirs roll out story after gold-plated story of sexist excess, I think: who’d want to be worldly? Here, she first met producer Jon Peters who introduced himself with his achievements – Rain Man, Batman, A Star Is Born ­– before installing her in a house next to Ronald Reagan’s in Bel Air. He sent daily presents – from Cartier, Ralph Lauren, Azzedine Alaïa – by chauffeur. A backless tux like the one in Flashdance; jodhpurs and riding boots. She says it was like Pretty Woman. He gave her a Tiffany Filofax, a Cartier Tank watch, a diamond tennis bracelet. “He asked for head rubs and for me to tickle his neck, but no more than that,” she writes. She moved out on the advice of a friend.

    There were others. Someone offered $10,000 just to have a Jacuzzi with her (“That sounds more than a Jacuzzi,” she said, declining); someone else thousands a day to sit by a pool on a remote island (“I don’t think so”). Her ability to sidestep situations like this was less to do with savoir faire and more “because I was like Mr Magoo” – in other words, blind lucky. Famous men begged to meet her, not least Fidel Castro, president of Cuba. She missed a call from John F Kennedy Jr – whom she was “too shy” to call back. The actor Sylvester Stallone offered her a condo and a Porsche to be his No 1 girl. “And I was like: ‘Does that mean there’s a No 2?’”

    Grabowski described Anderson as “Playboy’s DNA”. Baywatch asked her to audition for their show 12 times – persisting even when she didn’t show up. She laughs now at her first notes from the director: “Pretend it’s real!” But once she was in that red bathing suit playing CJ, there was no looking back. Baywatch became the most watched TV series in the world, with weekly audiences of 1.1bn in 142 countries (many insisted on “Pamela clauses”, buying only episodes she was in).

    Pamela Anderson in red swimsuit in the 90s TV show Baywatch
    In 90s hit TV series Baywatch. Photograph: Rex/Shutterstock

    Her relationship with Mötley Crüe drummer Tommy Lee – they met on New Year’s Eve 1994, then he bombarded her with 40 or 50 calls a day before following her to a photoshoot in Cancún where they married four days later in their swimmers on a beach – was regurgitated in the recent Pam & Tommy miniseries starring Lily James. She feels “violated” by the makers, Hulu, who never got in touch. “How are they allowed to do that?” They purported to show her sympathetically but really it was another instance of her life pillaged for others’ profit. James played Anderson without any of her real-life moxie. “I heard she’d been nominated for an Emmy, but maybe that was a joke,” she says (it’s not). She backtracks. “It’s not her fault; it’s a job. But whoever created it – well, it just feels like something else stolen.”

    She had almost sidestepped Lee, too, telling the hotel if a tattooed man showed up not to let him in. Finally, she caved, agreeing to meet for a drink – into which he’d slipped Ecstasy. “I didn’t even know what it was.”

    All the red flags, I say, and she sighs. She sighs a lot when talking about Lee. “Yes, well. But the love of my life was Tommy. And I know it wasn’t perfect but, you know, no one’s perfect.” We both laugh. “Oh OK, perfect for me. Two imperfect, crazy people. We made two beautiful babies and so I don’t have any regrets.”

    Certainly, they had a wild, childlike type of fun. Lee installed a swing above his piano where Anderson would sway naked while he played. They threw monster parties, but also tended the garden, played with their dogs. Then her workload exploded. Cast in a Barbarella reboot called Barb Wire, she began filming in the evening around her day job. To help with exhaustion, a girlfriend introduced her to ephedrine and “I liked how the pills kept me awake and I could get a lot done.”

    Bigger red flags came next. Lee would arrive on set every day, claiming “wife time”. “Tommy was so jealous,” she says. “I thought that’s what love is.” When they saw his black Ferrari Testarossa coming, the crew changed the scripts because Lee would stand behind the camera and glower at any suggestion of male contact. In her journal, she wrote of one Baywatch scene: “I had to kiss David Chokachi but I didn’t tell Tommy. He lost it. He trashed my trailer on the set, put his fist through a cabinet. I apologised for not telling him – lying, as he put it – and told him it wouldn’t happen again.” But after another outburst, when Lee rammed his car into the makeup trailer before going awol, Anderson tried to overdose on vodka and Advil. A suicide attempt? “I wanted it to be over a few times.” At the hospital, her younger brother Gerry, whom she’d moved to LA and who was working as an extra on Baywatch, confronted Lee, telling him he was killing his sister and her career.

    Pamela Anderson holding pink fabric in front of her, against white background, December 2022
    ‘The lawyers basically said: you’re in Playboy. You have no right to privacy.’ Photograph: Dylan Coulter/The Guardian. Chiffon: ISW

    Bob Guccione of Penthouse offered her $5m for the rights to the tape; she told him to go fuck himself. She has no regrets; she never wanted a dime from that film. Pregnant with her second child, she tried to sue IEG, the illegal distributors, for invasion of privacy. She learned the hard way that she had no rights. “I didn’t know that I was going to be completely humiliated. I remember walking into the room – all these guys in there. They had all these naked pictures of me. And the lawyers basically said: you’re in Playboy. You have no right to privacy.”

    Believing they used the deposition as cover, she says they asked her explicit questions about her sex life: where she liked to do it, her preferences, her body parts. She says they made her feel “horrible”, “a piece of meat”; “that this should mean nothing to me because I’m such a whore”. It reminded her of being 12 again, when she was raped by a 24-year-old friend of a friend. “And not to bring up something heavy from my childhood, but when I was attacked by this guy, I thought everybody would know. When the tape was stolen, it felt like that. And the deposition was so brutal.” I ask if she has talked about that feeling of being raped all over again and she says it was hard “to squeeze into a [David] Letterman interview when all they want to talk about is your boobs”.

    Brandon Lee, Pamela Anderson and Dylan Lee attend the Saint Laurent show at The Hollywood Palladium on February 10, 2016 in Los Angeles, California.
    ‘Despite the gene pool, they’re perfect gentlemen’: with sons Brandon and Dylan Lee, 2016. Photograph: Gregg DeGuire/WireImage

    One night in 1998, while she was dealing with their two small kids, Lee was rocking on the floor wailing: “I want my wife back.” “I need some fucking help around here,” she told him. “You gotta grow up. It’s not about you any more.” She saw his expression turn black. Later that night Lee was arrested for spousal and child abuse, and served six months in jail for battery. Anderson filed for divorce. Lee blamed stress: the tape, the kids and the fact that “Tommy comes third now instead of first; I don’t know how to deal with that”.

    Writing her memoirs, Anderson realised the stark similarities with her own parents’ marriage. Carol, a waitress at Smitty’s Pancake House, “was the blonde bombshell”; Barry, whom she calls a “poker player, chimney sweep and conman”, was a “bad boy on a motorcycle, cigarettes up in his sleeve, hair slicked back, crashing cars and in and out of trouble”. Anderson knew when to take Gerry, four years younger, out of harm’s way of their parents’ screaming. On return, they’d be “up against the wall or on top of the table just kissing, throwing themselves in the [bed]room, slamming the door. And we thought: OK, well, that’s better. It felt like the same energy, though.” More than once, Carol bundled them up and left. For a while, they lived on welfare in another town, but Pamela answered the telephone one day. It was her dad, asking the address. A lot of anger was unlocked in the process of writing, she says. A voice would come out of her that was “just crazy”. “I mean, I never felt so much rage in my life. It was a release but exhausting.” Both parents are still alive, although Barry suffered a stroke three years ago.

    Anderson knows jealousy is a big theme in her relationships – Kid Rock was so jealous of her friendship with the photographer David LaChapelle that he refused to believe he was gay. LaChapelle and the artist Daniel Lismore both offered to marry her to save her from heterosexual men. “I said: ‘I can’t do that to my mother. I can’t marry my gay best friends.’ David’s like: ‘We will be together for ever. You can do what you want, I can do what I want, and we’ll be this crazy interesting couple … ’” Her voice drifts off in semi-comedic despair.

    Daniel Lismore, Pamela Anderson and David LaChapelle ‘The Winter’s Tale’ press night, London, UK - 27 Feb 2017
    Pamela Anderson and Dame Vivienne Westwood attend the Andreas Kronthaler For Vivienne Westwood Womenswear Spring/Summer 2020 show as part of Paris Fashion Week on September 28, 2019 in Paris, France
    With friends Daniel Lismore and David LaChapelle in 2017 (top) and Vivienne Westwood in 2019 (above). Photographs: Piers Allardyce/Shutterstock; David M Benett/Getty Images

    Increasingly she surrounded herself with like-minded outcasts, among them singer Courtney Love and designer Vivienne Westwood. After Westwood’s death in December, Anderson emails me a poem she’s written in tribute. Westwood was “like a big sister, more than a friend. She was a guiding light and she and I were aligned in our love for people and the planet.” It was Westwood who introduced her to Julian Assange. Her visits to the Ecuadorian embassy, wearing cocktail dresses and carrying vegan rescue parcels, became infamous. No one knew quite how to read their relationship. She said she loved him – “I still do. He’s so funny. Kind of like nerdy funny. He repeats a joke two or three times – we get it, Julian.”

    In the book she calls him “sexy” and says that once, after sharing a bottle of mezcal, “we passed out, and I woke at four in the morning with his cat on my chest. We’d fallen asleep following a slightly frisky, fun, alcohol-induced night.” When I ask about it, she teases: “We were close, but I didn’t say it wasn’t platonic.” He asked her to marry him. “He was joking. He goes: ‘We should get married on the steps of the embassy. I wonder if they’d arrest me?’ Then, ‘But why give up one prison for another?’” She lets out a high laugh. (Four years later, Assange married his lawyer Stella Moris.)

    Pamela Anderson in black dress against white background, December 2022
    Photograph: Dylan Coulter/The Guardian. Styling: Alison Edmond. Hair: Sara Tintari. Makeup: Eileen Madrid. Dress: Maggie Marilyn

    She knows she’s a romantic, a magical thinker, a people-pleaser who loves chivalry, fairytales and relationships that rub her codependence all the wrong ways. But she’s also smart. She loves writing – her website has a section on “journaling” that includes her poems – and reading: Sylvia Plath, Anaïs Nin, Virginia Woolf, Doris Lessing. “I used to always carry Emily Dickinson.” She loves music and art; Nick Cave and Frida Kahlo.

    Her sons wanted her to make the documentary because they were fed up with people maligning her, not understanding who she actually was, fed up of having to defend her, all the way back to when they were fighting for her honour in the playground. “They didn’t deserve all the drama,” she says. “But, despite the gene pool, they’re perfect gentlemen. Looking at them today I get a little choked up because they’re such good men.”

    The process of going back over her life has made her think. “Holy cow. How did I get through all that? How did I make those choices? But I also have empathy for myself. I see that I just didn’t have the tools,” she says. From now on, she needs to find her own way through so she doesn’t “make the same mistakes” all over. “I’m really clear on being alone for at least a year. It’s been scary.” She sold her house in Malibu and retreated to Canada, completely alone. “I haven’t been near my friends hardly at all, either. The capacity to be alone is the capacity to love, right? But this is going to be good for me. I’m going to be able to get through it, because now with the documentary and the book, people will see the whole character. And then – maybe – I can become a human being again.”

    Pamela, a Love Story, will launch on Netflix on 31 January.

    [ad_2]
    #therapist #happened #Pamela #Anderson #chewed #spat #fame
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • The ‘carbon pirates’ preying on Amazon’s Indigenous communities

    The ‘carbon pirates’ preying on Amazon’s Indigenous communities

    [ad_1]

    A number of Indigenous communities in the Amazon say that “carbon pirates” have become a threat to their way of life as western companies seek to secure deals in their territories for offsetting projects.

    Across the world’s largest rainforest, Indigenous leaders say they are being approached by carbon offsetting firms promising significant financial benefits from the sale of carbon credits if they establish new projects on their lands, as the $2bn (£1.6bn) market booms with net zero commitments from companies in Europe and North America.

    A huge global expansion of protected areas during this decade was agreed by governments at last month’s Cop15 biodiversity summit with a target to protect 30% of land and sea by 2030. The agreement puts respect for Indigenous rights and territories at its heart amid fears of land grabs.

    Proponents of carbon markets, especially those that aim to protect rainforests, say that carbon credits are a good way to fund the new areas and pay Indigenous communities for the stewardship of their lands, as they have been shown to be the best protectors of forest and vital ecosystems. The resulting credits could then be used for climate commitments by western companies.

    Many believe that although carbon credits are not perfect, they can provide the vital finance these projects need. Johan Rockström, chief scientist at Conservation International, which manages a number of carbon offsetting projects, recently told the Guardian: “On the one hand, carbon offsetting is necessary, and has positive potentials of providing incentives and thereby generating much needed investments, for example in nature climate solutions [such as forests].” On the other, he says, are the risks that people will not then make the necessary reductions in their own emissions.

    The Guardian interviewed Indigenous leaders from across Latin America as part of its investigation into forest-based carbon offsetting, speaking to representatives at Cop27, Cop15, a summit of Amazon Indigenous leaders in September and during visitis to communities in Peru.

    An indigenous leader from Kichwa community
    A leader from the Kichwa community, who claim they have been forced from their land and received nothing despite an $87m carbon deal. Photograph: Angela Ponce/The Guardian

    While some leaders recognised the potential benefits from well designed carbon markets, they warn that Indigenous communities are being taken advantage of in the unregulated sector, with opaque deals for carbon rights that can last up to a century, lengthy contracts written in English, and communities being pushed out of their lands for projects.

    Examples include Peru’s largest ever carbon deal involving an unnamed extractive firm, where the Kichwa community claim they have been forced from their land in Cordillera Azul national park and received nothing from the $87m agreement. The park authorities say everything has been done in “strict compliance with current legal regulations and with special respect for the rights of Indigenous peoples”.

    Several Indigenous communities spoke of training themselves in carbon market regulation and organising global exchanges to help others avoid falling victim to “carbon pirates”.

    Fany Kuiru Castro, an indigenous Uitoto
    Fany Kuiru Castro, a leader of the Indigenous Uitoto people, says carbon offsetting is affecting nearly every community across the Amazon basin. Photograph: Angela Ponce/The Guardian

    Fany Kuiru Castro, an Indigenous Uitoto leader from the Colombian Amazon, says the issue is affecting nearly every community across the Amazon river basin.

    “When I visit other territories, nearly all of them are in contact with a business related to carbon. Normally they arrive with a promise of big money if the community agrees to set up a project. Sometimes they don’t let communities have access to their lands as part of the agreement but we live from hunting and fishing. For me, it’s dangerous,” she says. “The most cruel thing is they arrive in communities with long legal documents in English and don’t explain what’s in them. Many Indigenous communities don’t read or have low literacy, so they don’t understand what they’re agreeing to.”

    Wilfredo Tsamash, from the Awajun community
    Wilfredo Tsamash, from the Awajun community in northern Peru, is against extractive companies being allowed to buy carbon credits. Photograph: Angela Ponce/The Guardian

    Wilfredo Tsamash, from the Awajun community in northern Peru, says organisations are teaching themselves to understand the mechanics of carbon markets so they do not get ripped off in deals, and says he does not think extractive companies should be able to buy credits due to their role in global heating.

    “They are trying to divide us. Carbon pirates enter communities but we often do not know where they come from, how they work or who they are,” he says. “It’s a big issue. Some of these NGOs are ghosts, working in the background. I do not think we should sell the credits to oil companies or mining firms. They are the ones doing the damage.”

    Levi Sucre Romero speaking at Cop15
    Levi Sucre Romero speaking at Cop15. A Costa Rican from the Bribri community, he is an advocate for the rights of Indigenous people. Photograph: Andrej Ivanov/AFP/Getty Images

    Levi Sucre Romero, a Costa Rican leader from the Bribri community, said in a recent interview with Yale e360 that he thought the expansion of protected areas agreed at Cop15 could be a big opportunity for Indigenous communities. But, he tells the Guardian, respect for Indigenous territories and a share of the benefits from carbon deals must be part of any market.

    “We are organising ourselves at a global level, from the Congo to the Amazon. The first thing that needs to be recognised is a right to land, our right to be consulted, not just centrally but locally. We also need political representation that we are the ones that look after the forest. Where there are forests, there are Indigenous communities,” he says.

    Indigenous communities make up about 5% of the world’s population but look after 80% of its biodiversity. However, the communities are frequently subject to rights violations and attacks, often from illegal miners, loggers and drug traffickers.

    Shipibo leader Julio Cusurichi
    Shipibo leader Julio Cusurichi, from Peru, wants the money from selling carbon credits to pay for improved education and healthcare for his people. Photograph: Angela Ponce/The Guardian

    Julio Cusurichi, a Shipibo Indigenous leader from the Madre de Dios region of Peru who won the Goldman prize in 2007, says money from carbon credits could help pay for improved education and health facilities with careful planning, but all too often, that does not happen.

    “It’s important to strengthen the structures of Indigenous communities [as part of these offsetting projects]. This issue of carbon pirates is happening across the Amazon. They can be 30-, 40-, 100-year projects. Who has the money, has the power,” he says.

    Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield on Twitter for all the latest news and features



    [ad_2]
    #carbon #pirates #preying #Amazons #Indigenous #communities
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Ukrainian families vent frustration at struggle to find own homes in UK

    Ukrainian families vent frustration at struggle to find own homes in UK

    [ad_1]

    Maria, 22, came to the UK from Ukraine in March last year shortly after the war broke out. She and her mother travelled using the Ukraine family scheme visa to stay with her aunt. But when her aunt was evicted, they became homeless. For five months, Maria and her mother have been living in temporary accommodation in south London.

    “It’s horrible actually, the corridors are so old and so dirty,” Maria says. “The council haven’t been very helpful. The room is so small and it’s hard with two adults in one room.”

    Maria is hoping to find private accommodation, but it is unaffordable when living on universal credit. “You have to pay a deposit, and have a lot of savings but we don’t have that right now,” Maria adds.

    Maria, pictured with her mother Liudmyla
    Maria, pictured with her mother Liudmyla: ‘It’s horrible actually, the corridors are so old and so dirty.’ Photograph: Graeme Robertson/The Guardian

    The position Maria finds herself in is one shared by many of the more than 150,000 Ukrainians who came to the UK under the sponsorship scheme or to stay with relatives. In August, it was reported that more than 50,000 Ukrainian refugees in the UK could be made homeless in 2023 as initial six-month placements with hosts end without further accommodation in place.

    Anastasia Salnikova is the founder of the community interest group J&C Soul CIC, and has been supporting Ukrainian refugees as their sponsorship schemes come to an end. Difficulties in finding accommodation has been a recurring theme for Salnikova.

    “The problems people are facing are that some are becoming homeless when the sponsorship agreement comes to an end,” Salnikova says. “People are finding it so difficult to find private accommodation too. There are lots of single parents, or people on universal credit, and even those who have full-time jobs are struggling to find accommodation. So what is going to happen is that we are going to have lots more people facing homelessness as the scheme ends”.

    Anastasia Salnikova
    Anastasia Salnikova: ‘There are lots of single parents, or people on universal credit, and even those who have full-time jobs are struggling to find accommodation.’ Photograph: Graeme Robertson/The Guardian

    Despite having a relatively well-paying, full-time job as a chef, Oksana, who’s a single parent to her 12-year-old son, is struggling to find a place to live once the sponsorship scheme comes to an end. Since December, Oksana has enquired after at least seven properties but hasn’t been successful in finding somewhere for herself and her son to live.

    “The scheme is coming to an end and I’m trying to find private accommodation, but even though I’m earning good money and have a good job in central London, I can’t find accommodation because many places are too expensive or need a guarantor, which I don’t have.”

    “My sponsor is well-connected, and has been helping me to find somewhere too. But even with all the connections we have, and having a good job, it’s still a challenge,” Oksana says. “And so for the people without, it’s even harder”.

    Natalia Platonova and her partner, Andreyy Palatov, feel as if they’re in limbo. Their current sponsorship is due to end in the next few months, and although there is the possibility that it may be extended, this hasn’t been confirmed.

    Natalia Platonova and husband Andreyy
    Natalia Platonova and husband Andreyy: ‘No matter how wonderful our sponsors are, we want to be independent.’ Photograph: Graeme Robertson/The Guardian

    They are from Mariupol, which has been completely destroyed by bombing, so it is not an option for them to return. They want to build a life here.

    “On one hand, we’re extremely grateful that we’re here and that we were able to escape and survive, our sponsors have been wonderful,” the couple say, through an interpreter.

    “No matter how wonderful our sponsors are, we want to be independent but we don’t speak English and we’re middle-aged. It’s frustrating because we don’t see the prospect of having our own private accommodation, not because we don’t want to but because we don’t speak English it’s more difficult to find a job or a landlord who would rent to us,” they add.

    A spokesperson for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities said: “Homes for Ukraine has seen 112,000 Ukrainians welcomed to the UK, thanks to the generosity of sponsors.

    “We’ve provided councils with extensive funding including an addition £150m to support Ukrainian guests move into their own homes, as well as £500m to acquire housing for those fleeing conflict.

    “All Ukrainian arrivals can work or study and access benefits from day one and we have increased ‘thank you’ payments for sponsors to £500 a month once a guest has been here for a year.”

    [ad_2]
    #Ukrainian #families #vent #frustration #struggle #find #homes
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • ‘Attack on freedom’: Israel moves to claw back state funds from critical films

    ‘Attack on freedom’: Israel moves to claw back state funds from critical films

    [ad_1]

    Israel’s culture minister is attempting to revoke state funding from two documentary films dealing with the occupation of the Palestinian territories, increasing concerns that the country’s new hard-right government will follow through on promises to crack down on dissenting voices.

    The minister, Miki Zohar, of Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party, has pledged to “revoke funding that promotes our enemy’s narrative” and withhold grants from films that “present Israeli soldiers as murderers”. He has also said he will require film-makers to sign a declaration they will not use state funds to create content that “harms the state of Israel or IDF soldiers”.

    The minister says he wants the producers of two films, both currently screening in festivals and viewable on Israeli cable networks, to return government-funded grants. One, called H2: Occupation Lab, tracks the history of Israeli control over the West Bank city of Hebron. The second, Two Kids a Day, explores the arrests and interrogations of Palestinian children.

    Israeli cinema, including its high-profile documentary industry, is heavily reliant on the state through grants administered by a group of government-paid film funds.

    David Wachsmann, the director of Two Kids a Day, said: “These two films are in the eye of the storm, but this is an attack on freedom of expression in Israel, on culture and on every Israeli artist.”

    The film explores the arrests and interrogations of four children from the Aida refugee camp who were held – in one case for four years – on accusations of stone-throwing. Human rights organisations have documented hundreds such arrests annually. Most take place in the middle of the night when the children are sleeping.

    “Israel has decided to turn culture into propaganda,” said Noam Sheizaf, who directed H2: The Occupation Lab along with Idit Avrahami. Their film tracks the history of Hebron, where military rule and a far-right takeover by Jewish settlers have turned the once-bustling centre of the Palestinian city into a dystopian ghost town.

    It argues that the mechanisms of control first developed in Hebron – “Jewish supremacy in its most blatant and unapologetic form”, says Sheizaf – are replicated throughout the Palestinian territories and will increasingly reach Israel.

    Both films drew the ire of Shai Glick, a far-right activist known for targeting artists and cultural institutions he believes sully Israel’s reputation. His organisation, Betsalmo, launched pressure campaigns to get local authorities to cancel screenings – succeeding on one occasion when a public screening of H2 was canceled by the Israeli town of Pardes Hanna.

    Glick’s efforts reached the culture minister, who has asked the finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, to investigate whether the government can retroactively revoke grants made to the films.

    “Our film argues that not only the [Palestinian] territories, but also Israel is going through a process of ‘Hebronization’,” Sheizaf said. “What’s crazy is that the process that’s at the heart of the film happened to the film itself.”

    The culture ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

    This is not the first time an Israeli culture minister has targeted Israeli productions dealing with the occupation. Miri Regev, the firebrand politician who held the post from 2015-2020, worked to withdraw state support from critical productions. She also created the “Samaria Film Fund” for Jewish settlers to counter what she claimed was a leftwing bias in the industry. However, her bill that would have made state funding conditional on “loyalty” to the state, died in parliament.

    But under the current government – the most right wing in Israel’s history – artists worry that the guardrails that existed just a few years ago are about to come down. A proposed legal overhaul would gut the independence of the judiciary and of legal advisers, who have occasionally served as a check on similar efforts. The reforms to the judiciary have been the subject of mass protests in Israeli cities in recent weeks.

    At the same time, the government’s communications minister has vowed to dismantle the country’s public broadcaster, which, alongside its news operation, funds scores of television and documentary productions.

    “The feeling is that this is happening in the context of a watershed moment,” Sheizaf said. “If all of these things come to pass, this will be a very different country, overnight.”

    Wachsmann said that the controversy had resulted in more public discussion of Israel’s practices. “That’s the plus in all of this – there’s been a focus on Palestinian children. They’re the issue here.”

    [ad_2]
    #Attack #freedom #Israel #moves #claw #state #funds #critical #films
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • ‘Joe Biden has been constantly underestimated’: Chris Whipple on his White House book

    ‘Joe Biden has been constantly underestimated’: Chris Whipple on his White House book

    [ad_1]

    There are those who believe that at 80, Joe Biden is too old to serve a second term as president. Yet few clamour for him to hand over to the person who would normally be the heir apparent.

    Two years in, Kamala Harris, the first woman of colour to be vice-president, has had her ups and downs. Her relationship with Biden appears strong and she has found her voice as a defender of abortion rights. But her office has suffered upheaval and her media appearances have failed to impress.

    Such behind-the-scenes drama is recounted in The Fight of His Life: Inside Joe Biden’s White House, written by the author, journalist and film-maker Chris Whipple and published this week. Whipple gained access to nearly all of Biden’s inner circle and has produced a readable half-time report on his presidency – a somewhat less crowded field than the literary genre that sprang up around Donald Trump.

    “In the beginning, Joe Biden liked having Kamala Harris around,” Whipple writes, noting that Biden wanted the vice-president with him for meetings on almost everything. One source observed a “synergy” between them.

    Harris volunteered to take on the cause of voting rights. But Biden handed her another: tackling the causes of undocumented immigration by negotiating with the governments of Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras.

    “But for Harris,” Whipple writes, “the Northern Triangle would prove to be radioactive.”

    With the distinction between root causes and immediate problems soon lost on the public, Harris got the blame as migrants kept coming.

    One of her senior advisers tells Whipple the media could not handle a vice-president who was not only female but also Black and south Asian, referring to it as “the Unicorn in a glass box” syndrome. But Harris also suffered self-inflicted wounds. Whipple writes that she “seemed awkward and uncertain … she laughed inappropriately and chopped the air with her hands, which made her seem condescending”.

    An interview with NBC during a visit to Guatemala and Mexico was a “disaster”, according to one observer. Reports highlighted turmoil and turnover in Harris’s office, some former staff claiming they saw it all before when she was California attorney general and on her presidential campaign. Her approval rating sank to 28%, lower than Dick Cheney’s during the Iraq war.

    But, Whipple writes, Biden and his team still thought highly of Harris.

    “Ron Klain [chief of staff] was personally fond of her. He met with the vice-president weekly and encouraged her to do more interviews and raise her profile. Harris was reluctant, wary of making mistakes.

    “‘This is like baseball,’ Klain told her. ‘You have to accept the fact that sometimes you will strike out. We all strike out. But you can’t score runs if you’re sitting in the dugout.’ Biden’s chief was channeling manager Tom Hanks in the film A League of Their Own. ‘Look, no one here is going to get mad at you. We want you out there!’”

    Speaking to the Guardian, Whipple, 69, reflects: “It’s a complicated, fascinating relationship between Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

    “In the early months of the administration they had a real rapport, a real bond. Because of Covid they were thrown together in the White House and spent a lot of time together. He wanted her to be in almost every meeting and valued her input. All of that was and is true.

    “But when she began to draw fire, particularly over her assignment on the Northern Triangle, things became more complicated. It got back to the president that the second gentleman, Doug Emhoff, was complaining around town that her portfolio was too difficult and that in effect it was setting her up for failure. This really annoyed Biden. He felt he hadn’t asked her to do anything he hadn’t done for Barack Obama: he had the Northern Triangle as one of his assignments. She had asked for the voting rights portfolio and he gave it to her. So that caused some friction.”

    A few months into the presidency, Whipple writes, a close friend asked Biden what he thought of his vice-president. His reply: “A work in progress.” These four words – a less than ringing endorsement – form the title of a chapter in Whipple’s book.

    But in our interview, Whipple adds: “It’s also true that she grew in terms of her national security prowess. That’s why Biden sent her to the Munich Security Conference on the eve of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. She spent a lot of time in the meetings with the president’s daily brief and Biden’s given her some important assignments in that respect.”


    A former producer for CBS’s 60 Minutes, Whipple has written books about White House chiefs of staff and directors of the CIA. Each covered more than 100 years of history, whereas writing The Fight of His Life was, he says, like designing a plane in mid-flight and not knowing where to land it. Why did he do it?

    Chris Whipple.
    Chris Whipple. Photograph: David Hume Kennerly

    “How could I not? When you think about it, Joe Biden and his team came into office confronting a once-in-a-century pandemic, crippled economy, global warming, racial injustice, the aftermath of the attack on the Capitol. How could anybody with a political or storytelling bone in his body not want to tell that story? Especially if you could get access to Biden’s inner circle, which I was fortunate in being able to do.”

    Even so, it wasn’t easy. Whipple describes “one of the most leakproof White Houses in modern history … extremely disciplined and buttoned down”. It could hardly be more different from the everything-everywhere-all-at-once scandals of the Trump administration.

    What the author found was a tale of two presidencies. There was year one, plagued by inflation, supply chain problems, an arguably premature declaration of victory over the coronavirus and setbacks in Congress over Build Back Better and other legislation. Worst of all was the dismal end of America’s longest war as, after 20 years and $2tn, Afghanistan fell to the Taliban.

    “It was clearly a failure to execute the withdrawal in a safe and orderly way and at the end of the day, as I put it, it was a whole-of-government failure,” Whipple says. “Everybody got almost everything wrong, beginning with the intelligence on how long the Afghan government and armed forces would last and ending with the botched execution of the withdrawal, with too few troops on the ground.”

    Whipple is quite possibly the first author to interview Klain; the secretary of state, Antony Blinken; the CIA director, Bill Burns; and the chair of the joint chiefs of staff, Gen Mark Milley, about the Afghanistan debacle.

    “What became clear was that everybody had a different recollection of the intelligence. While this administration often seems to be pretty much on the same page, I found that there was a lot more drama behind the scenes during the Afghan withdrawal and in some of the immediate aftermath,” he says.

    The book also captures tension between Leon Panetta, CIA director and defense secretary under Barack Obama, who was critical of the exit strategy – “You just wonder whether people were telling the president what he wanted to hear” – and Klain, who counters that Panetta favoured the war and oversaw the training of the Afghan military, saying: “If this was Biden’s Bay of Pigs, it was Leon’s army that lost the fight.”

    Whipple comments: “Ron Klain wanted to fire back in this case and it’s remarkable and fascinating to me, given his relationship with Panetta. Obviously his criticism got under Ron Klain’s skin.”


    Biden’s second year was a different story. “Everything changed on 24 February 2022, when Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine. Joe Biden was uniquely qualified to rise to that moment and he did, rallying Nato in defiance of Putin and in defence of Ukraine. Biden had spent his entire career preparing for that moment, with the Senate foreign relations committee and his experience with Putin, and it showed.

    “Then he went on to pass a string of bipartisan legislative bills from the Chips Act to veterans healthcare, culminating in the Inflation Reduction Act, which I don’t think anybody saw coming.

    “One thing is for sure: Joe Biden has been constantly underestimated from day one and, at the two-year mark, he proves that he could deliver a lot more than people thought.”

    Biden looked set to enter his third year with the wind at his back. Democrats exceeded expectations in the midterm elections, inflation is slowing, Biden’s approval rating is on the up and dysfunctional House Republicans struggled to elect a speaker.

    But political life moves pretty fast. Last week the justice department appointed a special counsel to investigate the discovery of classified documents, from Biden’s time as vice-president, at his thinktank in Washington and home in Delaware.

    Whipple told CBS: “They really need to raise their game here, I think, because this really goes to the heart of Joe Biden’s greatest asset, arguably, which is trust.”

    The mistake represents a bump in the road to 2024. Biden’s age could be another. He is older than Ronald Reagan was when he completed his second term and if he serves a full second term he will be 86 at the end. Opinion polls suggest many voters feel he is too old for the job. Biden’s allies disagree.

    Joe Biden speaks at the National Action Network’s MLK Jr Day breakfast, in Washington this week.
    Joe Biden speaks at the National Action Network’s MLK Jr Day breakfast, in Washington this week. Photograph: Michael Brochstein/Sopa Images/Rex/Shutterstock

    Whipple says: “His inner circle is bullish about Biden’s mental acuity and his ability to govern. I never heard any of them express any concern and maybe you would expect that from the inner circle. Many of them will tell you that he has extraordinary endurance, energy.

    “Bruce Reed [a longtime adviser] told me about flying back on a red-eye from Europe after four summits in a row when everybody had to drag themselves out of the plane and was desperately trying to sleep and the boss came in and told stories for six hours straight all the way back to DC.”

    During conversations and interviews for the book, did Whipple get the impression Biden will seek re-election?

    “He’s almost undoubtedly running. Andy Card [chief of staff under George W Bush] said something to me once that rang true: ‘If anybody tells you they’re leaving the White House voluntarily, they’re probably lying to you.’

    “Who was the last president to walk away from the office voluntarily? LBJ [Lyndon Baines Johnson]. It rarely happens. I don’t think Joe Biden is an exception. He spent his whole career … thinking about running or running for president and he’s got unfinished business. Having the possibility of Donald Trump as the Republican nominee probably makes it more urgent for him. He thinks he can beat him again.”

    [ad_2]
    #Joe #Biden #constantly #underestimated #Chris #Whipple #White #House #book
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Several Injured In Twin Blasts

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: At least five persons were injured in twin mysterious blast in Narwal area of Jammu on Saturday.

    Quoting a senior police officer news agency GNS reported that the blasts were reported from two vehicles, leading to injuries to five persons.

    The injured have been evacuated to nearby hospital.

    “The area has been cordoned off and senior police officer along with other police personnel are at the spot and further investigations are underway,” he said.

    Previous articleMeT Predicts Snowfall In J&K
    16c0b9a15388d494e61bc20a8a6a07ba?s=96&d=mm&r=g

    [ad_2]
    #Injured #Twin #Blasts

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • 5 Persons Injured in Twin Mysterious Blast in Narwal Jammu

    5 Persons Injured in Twin Mysterious Blast in Narwal Jammu

    [ad_1]

    Srinagar, January 21: At least five persons were injured in twin mysterious blast in Narwal area of Jammu on Saturday.

    A senior police officer told GNS that the blasts were reported from two vehicles, leading to injuries to five persons.

    The injured have been evacuated to nearby hospital.

    ” The area has been cordoned off and senior police officer along with other police personnel are at the spot and further investigations are underway,”.(GNS)

    [ad_2]
    #Persons #Injured #Twin #Mysterious #Blast #Narwal #Jammu

    ( With inputs from : roshankashmir.net )