Tag: sued

  • Johnny Depp’s ‘Jeanne du Barry’ director Maiwenn sued for assaulting journalist

    Johnny Depp’s ‘Jeanne du Barry’ director Maiwenn sued for assaulting journalist

    [ad_1]

    Los Angeles: French actor-director Maiwenn, who recently directed Johnny Depp starrer ‘Jeanne du Barry’, has landed in legal trouble.

    According to Variety, she is being sued by Edwy Plenel, the editor-in-chief of Mediapart magazine for allegedly attacking him at a restaurant.

    A police complaint was filed on March 7 by Plenel, accusing Maiween of aggression. In the complaint, Plenel alleged that he was assaulted by Maiwenn in late February while eating at a restaurant in the posh seventh arrondissement of Paris.

    MS Education Academy
    image 14

    Maiwenn, who was sitting by herself at a nearby table, allegedly came to his table and grabbed him by the hair before spitting in his face without saying a word, then stormed out of the venue, leaving Plenel “traumatised by the incident.”

    While the police report was filed a month ago, it leaked Friday, just a day after the Cannes Film Festival announced that Maiwenn’s movie had been chosen to open its 76th edition.

    Though Mediapart hasn’t ever investigated Maiwenn, it published a series of bombshell stories about her ex-husband Luc Besson, with whom she shares a daughter, Shanna Besson.

    Maiwenn cast Depp to play French king Louis XV in ‘Jeanne du Barry’ while he was in the middle of his legal battle against his ex-wife Amber Heard. Maiwenn stars in the leading role as Jeanne du Barry, Louis XV’s greatest love whom he brought into the Versailles palace to live near him even though she wasn’t a noble.

    [ad_2]
    #Johnny #Depps #Jeanne #Barry #director #Maiwenn #sued #assaulting #journalist

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Govt to fact check, flag fake news on social media; firms to be sued over inaction

    Govt to fact check, flag fake news on social media; firms to be sued over inaction

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Internet firms like Google, Facebook and Twitter may lose protection under safe harbour if they fail to remove content identified by the government-notified fact-checker as false or misleading information, Minister of State for Electronics and IT Rajeev Chandrasekhar said on Thursday.

    He said that fact-checkers are a reference point to fight against misinformation and rejected arguments that it will adversely impact “free speech”.

    “If you want section 79 safe harbour protection as an intermediary then you have some obligation. The obligation is that you have to be proactive on misinformation.

    MS Education Academy

    “If you choose to have a disagreement with the fact checker, you can continue to have that on your platform but then the person who has been aggrieved by that disinformation and you will have a legitimate dispute in the court … section 79 was a safe harbour. That will get removed,” he said.

    Internet platforms and social media platforms such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, and internet service providers etc fall within the ambit of an intermediary.

    The safe harbour clause protects intermediaries from legal action on them for any objectionable content posted online by their users.

    The IT ministry will notify an entity that will flag false information posted online pertaining to the government, Chandrasekhar said.

    While releasing guidelines under the IT rules 2021, the minister said that the work on fact check is still in progress.

    “Government has decided to notify an entity through Meity and that organisation then would be the fact checker for all aspects of content online and only those content that are related to the government,” Chandrasekhar said.

    Chandrasekhar said “Dos and Don’ts” around fact-checking will be shared before it is notified.

    “We will certainly have an outliner on what the organisation will look like. Whether it will be PIB fact check and what will be the dos and don’ts. We will certainly have that shared as we notify,” the minister said.

    He said that PIB needs to be notified to be a fact checker under the IT rules.

    “Odds are that it will be a PIB fact check unit that will be notified. The reason we have not said PIB fact check explicitly under the rule is that it has not been notified under the IT rule,” Chandrasekhar said.

    The minister said intermediaries have asked the government to notify a fact checker on whom they can rely for their due diligence around false information.

    “We will notify fact-checkers under Meity to essentially help intermediaries decide what is misinformation or not. If they are able to do it on their own, fine. If they need help with government information, there will be a fact checker,” Chandrasekhar said.

    The minister said that intermediaries can continue to contest content flagged by the notified fact check entity but they may lose safe harbour protection under the IT Act.

    The government as part of the amendment in the IT Rules 2021 has mentioned that “in respect of any business of the Central Government, is identified as fake or false or misleading by such a fact check unit of the Central Government as the Ministry may, by notification published in the Official Gazette”.

    [ad_2]
    #Govt #fact #check #flag #fake #news #social #media #firms #sued #inaction

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • National Archives offers personal tours to anti-abortion activists who sued

    National Archives offers personal tours to anti-abortion activists who sued

    [ad_1]

    ap23027703347992

    The Archives issued a statement last week apologizing for the incident.

    “Early indications are that our security officers quickly corrected their actions,” the statement said, acknowledging the irony of the activists being told to cover up their protest garb while touring documents proclaiming free speech and freedom of religion.

    Another group of young attendees at the annual March for Life filed a similar lawsuit last week against the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that during a visit to the National Air and Space Museum on the same day, they were harassed and told to take off matching ski hats reading “Rosary PRO-LIFE.”

    The interim deal filed with the court on Tuesday in the Archives case will not resolve that lawsuit, but offers the plaintiffs a preliminary injunction similar to the one they planned to seek from the court, court papers say. The agreement needs approval from the judge assigned to the case, Timothy Kelly, an appointee of former President Donald Trump. According to a footnote, the deal is not intended to affect the Archives’ ability to regulate “clothing containing profanity.”

    No similar agreement has been filed in the suit stemming from the events at the National Air and Space Museum, but the Smithsonian has apologized for its guards’ actions and promised retraining.

    [ad_2]
    #National #Archives #offers #personal #tours #antiabortion #activists #sued
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )