Istanbul: Turkish women have defied a ban on protests and staged an annual march called “Feminist Night March” in Istanbul’s Taksim Square to mark International Women’s Day.
Although the police allowed the protesters on Wednesday night to carry on with their march for a while, later they used tear gas to disperse them, reports the BBC.
Several people were also detained.
The government in Turkey has banned today’s feminist night march, but the inspiring video you are watching features courageous women who refuse to comply with these unjust restrictions. United we stand, stronger than ever 💜 pic.twitter.com/kfBfJVAcly
— miray kurtuluş / NFT PARIS 2023 (@miraykurtulus) March 8, 2023
The women had gathered in the city’s Istiklal Street despite the ban imposed by the Beyoglu district governor’s office for all kinds of demonstrations and marches in the area, including the women’s day march.
Marking International Women’s Day, the main opposition Republican People’s Party earlier in the day released a report which said that more than 600 women had been killed in Turkey by men since 2021, when President Recep Tayyip Erdogan withdrew the country from the Istanbul Convention — a treaty that aimed to combat domestic violence.
Like every year the District Governor’s Office has banned the Feminist Night March on the grounds that it might “trigger social sensitivities”.
In a statement titled “we are sorry, we are angry”, the march organiser criticised the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) for failing to handle a range of crises and problems including ongoing economic deterioration, the coronavirus pandemic, the February 6 earthquakes that claimed more than 46,000 lives, and increasing racism and promoting LGBT+ hatred and patriarchy, reports the Turkish Minute news website.
It said that women are determined to continue their fight against patriarchy, homophobia, transphobia, exploitation of labour and capitalism.
The women at the march also chanted slogans calling on the government to resign.
“We are not going to be silent, we will not be intimidated, and we are not obeying you,” they said.
Every year, thousands of women gather in Taksim Square for the “Feminist Night March”, which marks the continuation of the world-famous “Reclaim the Night” movement, despite bans from authorities and police violence and detention.
(Except for the headline, the story has not been edited by Siasat staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
SRINAGAR: It was the return of the last two centuries on stage when a group of artists staged Chakdar Pather in Tagore Hall. Pather is basically a fold theatre that usually as satire and comedy as part of the process.
The play opened with a band of four people welcoming the guests to Shehnai, Surnayi, Nagar, and Dhol beats. The music was energetic to light up the stage. A group of dancers join in and entertain the audience more through the funny movements than the ‘dance’ itself.
In the next scene, two men Boud Maskhar (senior joker) and Loukut Maskhar (junior joker) started attacking technology, the digital world, and the zee generation. They hint at doing the play Chakdar Pather, which starts in the next scene.
The play was based in Kashmir’s nineteenth and twentieth centuries when most of the land was the ruler’s property and distributed to his family, friends and the bourgeoisie.
The stage was set up in a paddy field with the peasants working. The hard work of peasants was beautifully expressed in a song sung live by Sajad Maqbool Mir. The play exhibited the struggle of peasants to cultivate crops and the meagre income it generated for them.
Kashmiri artists staged a Chakdar Pather, a theatre play based on Kashmir’s feudal days, at Tagore Hall on March 4, 2023. KL Image: Bilal Bahadur
It showed how some peasants were on the verge of suicide because of paying taxes to Chakdars (land contractors). They had to toil throughout the season, but it did not generate enough money to run a family. Their families would often sleep without meals and some of them lost their lives to hunger.
The play shows a Kardar – Ram Chandar and his accountant – Somnath calculating the land given to Kaashtkars and the taxes they paid in the past year. If someone did not pay, they would take back the land and give it to someone else who would pay better. They would visit the village once in a while to check on the peasants and collect taxes. They were shown beating those who failed to pay the whole amount and praising those who paid them. Kardar was so affectionate towards Chakdari that he considered it over God and his own life.
Then, Kardar’s used to be the bridge between the peasants and the land contractors appointed by the despotic rulers.
The whole play presented a serious issue with a tinge of comedy through dialogues and actions, which kept the audience hooked. There was not any gap left to feel the other way about it. Sajad Maqbool Mir played the rabab in the background, which also helped the audience to stay hooked to the stage.
As the peasants suffer, the play goes on to show, they plan to complain to their leader about it and they do so. The leader gives them all the support needed and encourages them to speak against it. They plan a strike. Soon, all of them visit the Kardar. The leader demands a one-fourth share of the income generated through the crops as the peasants work hard. Kardar, who seems to be afraid of the leader, agrees to their demand.
The play was written by Reshi Rasheed, and its design and direction were done by Ramzan. The character of Boud Maskhar is played by Mehraj ud Din Bhat, Loukut Maskhar by Aashiq Hussain Sheikh, Jamal by Mushtaq Ahmad Dar, Ramzan by Nisar Ahmad Bhat, Rajab Ganaie by Javed Ahmad Shah, Leader by Ishfaq Ahmad Bhat, Ram Chandar by Ghulam Rasool Lone (Founding Member of the theatre group), Somnath by Master Abdul Samad Mir and other Actors (peasants) by Mohammad Maqbool Bhat, Mohammad Ramzan Lone, Abdul Majeed Dar. The singer in the play is Sajad Maqbool Mir.
Dhol is played by Ghulam Mohammad Bhat, Shehnai was played by Ghulam Mohammad Bhat, Surnayi is played by Abdul Khaliq Bhat, and Nagaar was played by Ghulam Mohammad Bhat. The dancer is Bilal Ahmad Bhat. Costumes were provided by Abdul Samad Mir, Light Direction by Aashiq Hussain Najar, Lights Operations by Tariq Ahmad Hajini, and Sound by Aijaz Ahmad. The stage was set up by Trilok Singh Bali, Mohammad Amin, and Suhail.
Rahm Emanuel couldn’t escape a runoff either when he ran for reelection in 2015 in a four-man mayor’s race.
So without clearing the field before Election Day, Lightfoot is facing three main threats: former public schools CEO Paul Vallas to her right, Cook County Commissioner Brandon Johnson to her left, and Rep. Jesús “Chuy” García fuzzily bouncing around in between with Lightfoot.
One new wrinkle this year is that voters are coming out stronger: 193,076 people have voted early, as of Saturday — outpacing the 113,398 who turned out at that point in the race four years ago.
But this is Chicago, so race is another key factor. And it’s a complex one for Lightfoot, whose base among Black voters — particularly Black women — may splinter unevenly among the five other Black candidates. Vallas is white, and García is Latino. All the candidates declared themselves as Democrats.
“Chicago is the epicenter of racial politics. Any political contest in Chicago is driven by turnout, especially turnout among racial demographics,” said Collin Corbett, a center-right political strategist who isn’t aligned with any of the mayoral candidates but whose firm is polling the race. “Lightfoot needs a really strong turnout among Black voters.”
Vallas is believed to have secured another key voting bloc — white residents on the city’s North Side, an area Lightfoot dominated four years ago.
A former school administrator in Chicago, New Orleans and Philadelphia, Vallas has run unsuccessfully for other public offices over the years, including mayor and governor. His campaign theme this time, focusing on public safety, has resonated with voters who dismissed Vallas in previous elections, including in the 2019 mayor’s race.
“This isn’t the race anyone expected,” said Corbett, noting how García was considered a frontrunner a few months ago.
The congressman, who took Emanuel to a runoff in 2015, started campaigning late, waiting until he won reelection to Congress before launching his second bid for mayor.
Lightfoot didn’t waste time airing TV ads attacking García’s connections to Chicago machine politicians and for accepting a donation from indicted crypto king Sam Bankman-Fried.
The broadsides seemed to work. But in shifting support away from García, fellow progressive Johnson gained momentum. Now Johnson is getting hit from Lightfoot and other candidates over his past comments about his support for “defunding” police.
Amid this tussle, Vallas, who has the backing of the city’s Fraternal Order of Police, surged with his message about crime being out of control. Lightfoot sees it as stoking fears.
García has a long history of helping build a bench of Latino candidates in Illinois. And Johnson is backed by the Chicago Teachers Union, both in endorsements and financially. He also works for the union.
[ad_2]
#9person #stage #drama #Chicago #wont #Election #Day
( With inputs from : www.politico.com )
SRINAGAR: The Kashmir Chamber of Commerce & Industry (KCC&I) has expressed its opposition to the government’s decision to impose property tax in Jammu & Kashmir. In a recent meeting of the Executive Committee, the KCC&I stated that the sentiment of trade, commerce, and industry in the union territory is low, and people are not in a position to bear the burden of paying the property tax at this stage.
The KCC&I believes that Jammu & Kashmir has undergone a long spell of disturbed periods during which time businesses and citizens have suffered and depleted their assets and lifetime savings. While some sectors have shown signs of revival, it is not advisable to burden people with more taxes, especially considering the post-Covid economic scenario.
The KCC&I draw the attention of authorities to the global sentiment of revival and requests them to reconsider imposing property tax, at least until the economic scenario stabilizes. The Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir being a landlocked tier 3 state, cannot be compared justifiably with Delhi, Chandigarh, or other UT or states, the KCC&I added.
The KCC&I appeals to the administration to put the notified property tax on hold, and instead consult with stakeholders before making any decision. The KCC&I remind authorities that property tax was levied in the past but had to be withdrawn for obvious reasons.
The deceased men Nasir and Junaid. Photo: Twitter/MeerFaisal.
Jaipur: After the charred bodies of two Bharatpur youths – Nasir and Junaid – were found in Haryana recently, the families of the victims have staged a dharna in the village graveyard in the district demanding the arrest of killers.
They alleged that when Kanhaiya was murdered in Udaipur, his criminals were caught in 1 hour, but now the killers of both victims have not been arrested yet.
Nasir’s and Junaid’s cousin Mohammad Javed said that he will not move from dharna until the accused are arrested. “We all are sitting on dharna, we will continue to sit on dharna like this till our demands are fulfilled,” he said.
Mohammad Jabir is protesting at his brother Nasir’s grave, demanding that the main culprit, Monu Manesar, be arrested immediately.
Cow vigilantes allegedly burned Nasir and Junaid alive in Loharu, Haryana.
A complaint was registered on February 15, after Junaid and Nasir were abducted and beaten up by unknown people. They were allegedly taken along; relatives allege that Junaid and Nasir were kidnapped in their own Bolero car and were burnt alive.
Bharatpur Police along with Haryana Police is probing the whole matter, and efforts are being made to arrest absconding accused.
A delegation of Muslim community led by State Minister Zahida Khan met Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot in Jaipur on Saturday.
Bhubaneswar: The women’s wing of the ruling BJD in Odisha staged a dharna here on Thursday demanding removal of Jaynarayan Mishra from the post of the Leader of Opposition for allegedly misbehaving with a woman police officer in Sambalpur.
Mishra on Wednesday stirred controversy by allegedly pushing the woman police officer during a BJP protest in Sambalpur. The incident took place in front of the district collector’s office during the party’s statewide stir on “worsening” law and order in the coastal state.
The saffron party too staged a dharna near Raj Bhavan, claiming that there was a bid to eliminate Mishra, also the BJP MLA from Sambalpur, for criticising the state government in connection with the assassination of ex-minister Naba Kishore Das.
Members of the BJD and BJP also burnt effigies of the Leader of Opposition and Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik respectively.
Holding placards and banners, the BJD activists who were on a dharna on MG Road, accused Mishra of pushing and assaulting the woman police officer.
The protesters also demanded an apology from Mishra.
BJD spokesperson Shreemayee Mishra claimed Jaynarayan Mishra was a “habitual offender”, with 14 cases, including murder, registered against him.
Meanwhile, members of the saffron party demanded the chief minister’s resignation for allegedly failing to maintain law and order in the state.
The BJP for the last two days was holding demonstration across the state over the “worsening” law and order following the assassination of Naba Kishore Das last month allegedly by a former policeman.
Based on the complaint of Dhanupali Police Station Inspector in-charge Anita Pradhan, the law enforcers in Sambalpur had on Wednesday booked Mishra under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Meanwhile, Sambalpur Mahila BJP also lodged a complaint against Anita Pradhan, alleging that she had pushed and misbehaved with the Leader of Opposition.
A video (not verified by PTI) that went viral showed Mishra assaulting the woman police officer in the western Odisha city.
The BJP rank and file, including its senior leaders, came down heavily on the state government alleging that Mishra was being framed by the BJD after he launched a scathing attack on the state government following Naba Kishore Das murder case.
“It is a plot created by the BJD to fix Mishra as he was attacking the government on its weak points. The woman police officer instead misbehaved with the Leader of Opposition, who is considered as second to the chief minister in the Assembly,” said BJP state in-charge D Purendeswari.
Senior BJP leader and Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan said the incident was “pre-planned” and “sponsored” by the government to “cover up its inefficiency and wrongdoings”.
“Jaynarayan Mishra was not appointed the Leader of Opposition as a charity from Naveen Patnaik. He was appointed by the Parliamentary Board of the BJP The law and order situation is fast deteriorating in the state.
“Such pre-planned and state-sponsored acts do not last long in a democracy,” Pradhan told reporters.
IG, North Range, Deepak Kumar said the police has registered a case against Mishra on the basis of a complaint by the woman police officer.
The BJP’s complaint against the police officer has been registered as a station diary, Kumar said.
The complaint by the saffron party will be probed while investigating the allegations made by the woman police officer, Kumar said.
Meanwhile, BJP’s Bhubaneswar MP Aparajita Sarangi said, “We know an incident has taken place and the law will take its own course. The incident is worrisome both for the party and Mishra”.
Meanwhile, Mishra alleged that a group of BJD goons Thursday reached the circuit house at Sambalpur where he was staying.
“The BJD goons had come to eliminate me,” Mishra told reporters in Sambalpur.
The BJP MLA from Sambalpur also accused the Dhanupali Police Station Inspector in-charge Anita Pradhan of pushing him.
“The IIC, who was involved in corrupt practices, had intentionally shoved me. She stamped on my feet and pushed me twice,” Mishra told reporters.
Amid all the recent commentary about John Cleese resurrecting Fawlty Towers, one fact struck me as even more preposterous than the setting’s proposed relocation to a Caribbean boutique hotel: when the original series aired, Cleese was only 35 years old.
When it comes to screen culture, middle age isn’t what it used to be. People magazine gleefully reported last year that the characters in And Just Like That, the rebooted series of Sex and the City, were the same age (average 55) as the Golden Girls when they made their first outing in the mid-80s. How can that be possible? My recollection of the besequined Florida housemates was that they were teetering off this mortal coil, but then everyone seems old when you are young.
Meanwhile, a popular Twitter account, The Meldrew Point, has the sole purpose of celebrating people who, implausibly, have reached the age the actor Richard Wilson was when he appeared in the first episode of One Foot in the Grave (19,537 days). It’s hard to believe, but these 53-and-a-half-year-olds include J-Lo, Renée Zellweger, Molly Ringwald, Julia Sawalha and Ice Cube.
Looking good at 53 … Jennifer Lopez. Photograph: Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for The Recording Academy
Back in the day, 40 was the marker for midlife, but now, finding consensus on when middle age begins and what it represents isn’t easy. The Collins English dictionary gnomically defines it as “the period in your life when you are no longer young but have not yet become old”. The Encyclopaedia Britannica says it is between 40 and 60. Meanwhile, a 2018 YouGov survey reported that most Britons aged between 40 and 64 considered themselves middle-aged – but so did 44% of people aged between 65 and 69.
“There’s no point trying to impose chronological age on what is or is not middle age,” says Prof Les Mayhew, the head of global research at the International Longevity Centre UK. “With people living longer, your 30s are no longer middle age; that has switched to the 40s and 50s.” But even then, he believes putting a number on it is meaningless. “In some cases, in your 50s, you might be thinking about a second or even third career, but for others you might have serious health problems and be unable to work.
“Governments are always trying to impose these labels of administrative convenience for things that are supposed to happen at a certain age – for example, you are allegedly an adult at the age of 18 and you aren’t old enough to receive a state pension until 66. Totally arbitrary. Meanwhile, GPs want you to book in for a ‘midlife MOT’, which is a great jazzy concept to get out of what should be happening – an annual health check-up.”
Patrick Reid, 53, is a London-based financial trader who has an unusual perspective on age. “I went to university late; I was 23 and other students used to say to me: ‘Oh, you’re so old!’ Then, after working for 15 years as a programme scheduler on BBC Two, I decided to change career. I turned up for my first day on a futures trading desk in my best suit with a Guardian under my arm. The place was full of these 21-year-olds in jeans going: ‘Who the hell is this?’
“Then, eight years ago, I went through another change. I’d been a bit of a party animal; it wasn’t agreeing with me. I decided to take steps to get happier and fitter. I feel so lucky now that I can go to the gym, run my own business and have a holistic outlook on life. Age has no meaning to me, except sometimes I do look in the mirror and say: ‘Oh yeah, I am actually 53.’”
Left, the Golden Girls, aged between 51 and 63; right, the cast of And Just Like That, in their mid-50s. Composite: Cine Text/Allstar; WarnerMedia Direct/HBO Max
Middle age once had a purpose of sorts, a time that offered the stability and continuity that used to come from having a job for life. Now, it’s not just your employment that might feel precarious, but your job function itself. Research from the Institute for the Future reported that 85% of jobs that will exist by 2030 don’t exist yet.
“This used to be a stage where you slowed down to enjoy life. It allowed a person to take stock and reassess,” says Julia Bueno, a therapist and the author of Everyone’s a Critic. “Now, it’s: ‘Retrain to be a psychotherapist!’ I think middle age reflects that you’ve still got life in you; you’re embracing a last hurrah. But I’m also aware that some people feel pressurised to reinvent themselves, to look fantastic, to not slow down or age gracefully. There’s the pressure to put retinol on your face, or erase or glam the greys. You’re not allowed to just be grey – it has to be glamorous.”
Bueno works with many women who have become mothers in their 40s, even 50s, and considers this another important shift. “Having a newborn in your arms does throw hackneyed ideas about middle age out of the window.”
The very words “middle age” can cause strong negative reactions. Roz Colthart, 49, runs a property business in Edinburgh alongside studying for a master’s degree. “Middle age as a term makes you feel a bit yuck. The term ‘middle’ is so vanilla; who wants to be average? You’re no longer young, but you’re not an old sweetie that people are going to give up their seat for on the bus, either. Yet middle age is actually a fantastic place to be. It’s just the judgmental attitudes towards it that are depressing.”
Colthart does not tick many of middle age’s traditional boxes. “I don’t have a husband; I don’t have children. There is a pressure on people that we have to conform with the life cycle according to what age we are.”
It’s true that, in the past, midlife was associated with a particular set of life circumstances – a mortgage, a spouse, children, a lawnmower. But for many, these life stages are happening later, if at all. It must be harder to feel like you are in the pipe-and-slippers phase of life when, at 40, you still live in a flatshare and don’t own a sofa, let alone a home.
Dalia Hawley, 41, lives in Wakefield and is what marketers would term a “geriatric millennial”. She lives with her partner and their three chickens and runs a skincare business part-time. “I might be classed as middle-aged to some people, but I don’t feel it. Part of me does sometimes feel as if I should own a house or have a full-time job, but then I think I couldn’t imagine anything worse. I’ve never earned enough to get a mortgage. When I was in my 20s, I thought 40 was really old. But now I’m there, I feel younger and fitter than I’ve ever been.”
So what age does she consider to be old? “I’m not sure there is such an age. It’s more a question of whether someone can live independently. For example, both my parents are in their late 70s and still go travelling in their caravan. I don’t think of them as being old at all.”
The crime writer Casey Kelleher, 43, is another midlife millennial. She is equally scathing about the idea of being middle-aged: “I feel as if I’m only now starting my life. My first son was born when I was 17 and my second at 20. I met my husband a couple of years later. The kids have left home and now we are reassessing our lives.” While most of her friends are setting down with young families, she is contemplating travelling, moving abroad or working with foster children.
“Midlife isn’t a plateau,” she says. “I don’t like the phrase ‘over the hill’, as if the best times are behind you. Considering how long we might live, it’s worth savouring every single day.”
Kelleher finds that writing older characters is exciting. “The stakes are much higher in midlife. By then, people have richer life experiences, lifelong friendships, real love, loss, pain and heartbreak. Characters have more to lose if things go wrong. The way that characters, particularly female ones, between 40 and 60 are depicted by my generation of crime writers and on TV has started to change. Just look at Happy Valley.”
The stories we tell about being a particular age are powerful because they reflect what is expected of us, what possibilities might await. Sharon Blackie, a psychologist and the author of Hagitude: Reimagining the Second Half of Life, says that in recent years, for women, at least, the cultural discussion has shifted so that menopause has eclipsed middle age as a significant transition. “The interesting thing is that menopause can happen at all different ages – mid-40s, mid-50s and beyond – rather than one age.” Certainly, high-profile documentaries such as Channel 4’s documentary Sex, Myths and the Menopause, and online communities such as Noon, have changed the conversation.
Blackie observes that, in folklore, the hag, while appearing to be the epitome of people’s fears about ageing, is actually a positive archetype. “The hag is a woman, from menopause onwards, who is not defined by their relationship to anyone else. They are not someone’s mother or daughter or wife; they have their own power, their own way of being in the world. There is a freedom to not belonging to anyone that allows them to come to fruition in the world.”
Madonna, age 64, at the Grammy awards earlier this month. Photograph: Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for The Recording Academy
It’s a comforting theory, but I am not sure the world has caught up with it yet. You need only witness the wave of vitriol directed at Madonna’s smooth-cheeked appearance at the Grammys to realise that there is still widespread fear about how women choose to tackle the ageing process.
And what of men? In the past, the male midlife crisis had a well-trodden set of cliches, from the red Ferrari or Harley-Davidson to the trophy wife. Are these still relevant? These days, the term seems to be associated more with anxiety, depression and the search for meaning than with the quest for leather trousers. I even came across an academic paper entitled Dark Night of the Shed: Men, the Midlife Crisis, Spirituality – and Sheds.
“Although men don’t experience the same cataclysmic physical change as women in midlife, many of the men I speak to do go through a significant psychological change around the age of 50, which can be accompanied by a similar sense of grief and loss that women go through with menopause,” says Blackie. “Carl Jung theorised that the first half of life was about working in the outer world, developing your identity, career and family. He viewed the second half of life as being about turning inward, searching for meaning, spiritual or otherwise.”
For many men, a less esoteric way of addressing existential angst is to embrace a punishing fitness regime. Yet, while this is generally a healthy thing, the body doesn’t lie. Devoted tennis player Geoff Dyer, the 64-year-old author of The Last Days of Roger Federer, a meditation on late middle age, recently had elbow surgery. “Three months after the operation, by which time I was supposed to be able to play tennis again, I saw the surgeon and told him it hadn’t worked. I’d gone from being a coolish middle-aged person with an elbow problem to an old and frail invalid.
“He showed me the MRI, which proved it had worked, and said to keep at it, keep doing the physical therapy. And he was right. I’m now restored to full fitness. It might not seem like that to you if you saw me hobbling around the court, but I am in a state of youthful-seeming bliss.”
Dyer is similarly exasperated that he cannot drink much any more. “Boozing takes a fearsome toll as you get older. I say that with some authority, because we had a dinner at home in LA on Saturday where I had a skinful of delicious red wine – by London standards, a modest amount – and felt like 100-year-old sludge for 24 hours afterwards.”
And therein lies the problem with all our “age is just a number” mental gymnastics. Dispensing with middle age is comforting because if we never face up to being in the middle, we will never have to contemplate the end. Until we are forced to, that is.
A good friend of mine turned 60 recently; he summed up the experience as “a sudden cold-water splash of finding yourself facing terms like ‘geriatric’ and ‘senior’ and feeling utterly disconnected from any real sense of what your biological age means, other than the onset of physical decrepitude and declining eyesight”. The rude awakening was largely caused, he said, because “when we get to our 50s, we kid ourselves that it’s just a last gasp of the early 40s, when it isn’t at all”.
Researching this article, I was struck by the fact that not a single person I spoke to was happy to own the badge of middle age. But back in the day, the term was viewed as a state rather than a trait. A person was middle-aged because that was their actual stage of life, not simply labelled as such because they were uncreative, tedious or, heaven forfend, unproductive. As someone who went back to university at 56 and is planning to launch a business, I am as guilty of a failure to relax as everyone else. Are we all just frantically trying to stave off the inevitable?
Bueno recalls being at a 50th birthday party at a pub with funky music. “People were having a great time. We were all bending ourselves out of shape, leaning in to talk to one another.” You might think they were discussing important ideas and plans for the future, but you would be wrong. “Everyone was shouting the same sentence: ‘I can’t hear a bloody thing!’”
[ad_2]
#happened #middle #age #mysterious #case #disappearing #life #stage
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )
New Delhi: Members of the Aam Aadmi Party, Shiv Sena Thackeray faction and Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) on Wednesday staged a walkout from the Rajya Sabha after their adjournment notices were disallowed by the chair.
Soon after laying of papers, Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar said he has received four notices under Rule 267 from BRS member K Keshava Rao, AAP member Sanjay Singh and Shiv Sena members Sanjay Raut and Priyanka Chaturvedi and disallowed the same.
Rao stood up and raised objection to the Rajya Sabha chairman’s remarks on Tuesday on their boycott of the House.
Sanjay Singh also rose to seek a discussion on the Adani issue but was not allowed by the chair as their notices were disallowed.
Soon, the BRS, Sena and AAP members staged a walkout from the House.
The House started the discussion on the motion of thanks to the president’s address as there was no Zero Hour and Question Hour. The discussion on the motion of thanks would continue without lunch break.
“I have received four notices under Rule 267 from Sanjay Raut, K Keshava Rao, Sanjay Singh, Priyanka Chaturvedi. I reiterate my stand. I have carefully gone through them. I do not find the notices in order. I am constrained not to allow them,” the chairman said.
On BRS member Rao’s anguish over the chairman’s remarks made on Tuesday, he said, “The kind of aggressive body language you are reflecting is most unfortunate. You have perhaps not had the occasion to go through what I had said yesterday with full sense of sublimity, sobriety and seriousness.”
Asking him to take his seat, he said, “This is not the way we conduct this House. What I said is on record, you can take recourse to rules. This is not the way to do it. I have conveyed my sentiments and these are the sentiments of millions of people.”
Dhankhar said for the first time in this country, a history of the “wrong type” has been created by engaging in a proclaimed boycott of the President.
“I would urge the members, we are sending a very dangerous signal to people. Their anger is beyond tolerance. Every time in the morning they see this spectacle of the House being plunged into disorder as part of strategy,” the chairman said.
AAP, BRS members created uproar by raising slogans of “PM sadan mein aao. jawaab do. JPC se jaanch karao (PM should come to the House and answer and JPC probe should be ordered)” and later staged a walkout.
They later held a demonstration in front of the Gandhi statue in Parliament premises.
Feinstein, the longest-serving Democrat in the Senate, is in the midst of one of the most uneasy codas to a political career. Her extended pre-departure has, for many of her fellow Democrats, turned into an abject lesson in the perils of hanging on.
“She’s still the state’s senior senator,” said one longtime Democratic strategist in California. “And they’re dancing on her [political] grave.”
The oldest member of Congress at 89, Feinstein has for decades been a fixture in Democratic politics here. But as the electorate in California shifted, her brand of centrism fell out of step with her party’s progressive base — so much so that the California Democratic Party in the 2018 primary declined to endorse her reelection bid. She ran and won handily anyway.
More problematic for Feinstein has been the persistent questions about her health. Even Democrats sympathetic to the senator have been reading headlines about her cognitive fitness to serve. The stories about it pop up with such regularity now that they no longer elicit the shock value of the early versions, when publication of such matters seemed to be violating some unwritten code of D.C. conduct.
Feinstein’s office has long batted down such talk, saying she has her full facilities and remains utterly capable of executing the job of senator to the nation’s most populous state. Still, it’s a long way from the days of Harvey Milk or the “year of the woman” when she and Barbara Boxer became the first women elected to the Senate from California in 1992. Heck, it’s a long way from 2019, when Annette Bening was portraying her as an anti-torture, Bush administration-fighting crusader in the political drama “The Report.”
In California, Democrats are left looking for signs that she, too, sees that the show is coming to a close. That includes even those supporting her.
After Feinstein this week reported raising less than $600 in the last fundraising period, one of her small-dollar donors, a Carlsbad, Calif., man named William Betts, said, “I have some automatic payments in there that are still ongoing.”
“I would much prefer a younger candidate, certainly anybody from Gen X,” he said. “My preference is that she retires.”
Much of California would appear to be ready for that. In a Berkeley IGS Poll taken about a year ago, Feinstein’s job approval rating in the state hit an all-time low of 30 percent. An October measure by the Public Policy Institute of California put her approval rating higher, at 41 percent among likely voters, but still underwater.
“There hasn’t been much that’s been said in terms of her recent leadership that’s been positive,” said Mark Baldassare, director of the poll. “It really has been a while since I’ve read or heard glowing remarks about her.”
Still, he said that if he was polling on the Senate race now, he would include her.
“Until further notice,” he said, “she’s the senator.”
But almost everyone else in California, it seems — some more gently than others — is preparing for her not to be. Pelosi, before issuing her conditional endorsement of Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), said that if Feinstein does seek reelection, “she has my whole-hearted support.” But no politician puts out that kind of statement if they expect her to. Schiff and Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) are already running. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), has told her colleagues she plans to. Rep Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) is giving consideration to the race.
The already declared candidacies, in turn, have ignited a scramble among eager Democrats downstream from them to announce campaigns for their soon-to-be-open House seats.
“It seems like all of them are handling it professionally, and honoring Dianne,” said Bob Mulholland, a veteran Democratic strategist and former Democratic National Committee member.
Even if the rush to fill a chair that Feinstein still occupies is, collectively, “pretty tasteless,” as one Democratic strategist described it, it may be hard to fault politically. The California primary will be in March of 2024 — just more than a year away — and candidates will need to raise tens of millions of dollars to compete in the state’s enormous media markets.
“What’s sad about this is that she’s always been somebody you didn’t dare mess around with,” the strategist said. “And it looks like that’s just gone.”
Already, Schiff is raising money and Porter, with her whiteboards out, is bringing in cash too. At her first campaign event, in Northern California last month, she told the crowd it’s time for “a fresh new voice” in the Senate.
For her part, Feinstein has hardly batted an eye at the spectacle surrounding her, even if the pre-announcement announcements run counter to what Boxer adviser Rose Kapolczynski called “a long tradition of deference.”
“The senator has said on a few occasions the more the merrier,” a Feinstein spokesperson said. Of Feinstein’s own timeline, she told Bloomberg News that she’ll announce plans “in the spring sometime.”
“Not in the winter,” Feinstein said. “I don’t announce in the winter.”
If she does announce her retirement, it may dramatically shift the opinion her constituents have of her. Politicians are often more popular when they go.
“There will be all the usual retrospectives about her career and her groundbreaking moments, and gun control and abortion and Harvey Milk and all of that,” Kapolczynski said. “There’ll be an afterglow. Once you announce you’re not running again, you get an afterglow from the voters.”
That will likely come no matter when Feinstein makes her announcement. And after 30 years in the Senate, some Democrats say, she has clearly earned the right to make her plans on whatever timeline she likes.
“I think she’s been a great senator, but you know … the writing’s been on the wall all for a while,” said Steve Maviglio, a former New Hampshire state lawmaker and Democratic strategist in California. “I think she wants to bow out on her terms.”
[ad_2]
#Dianne #Feinsteins #extremely #awkward #uncomfortable #exit #political #stage
( With inputs from : www.politico.com )
New Delhi: Members of various Left organisations staged a protest at the Jawaharlal Nehru University campus on Thursday against the “hooliganism” of the RSS-affiliated ABVP, a day after students claimed that stones were hurled at them during the screening of the controversial BBC documentary on the 2002 Gujarat riots.
The students, affiliated to the Students’ Federation of India, Democratic Students’ Federation, All India Students Association and other organisations raised slogans against the ABVP and held placards that read ‘rise in the rage against ABVP hooliganism’.
“ABVP goons hurled stones at students gathered for the screening of the documentary. This is hooliganism,” AISA JNU president Qasim said.
The protest was organised by the JNU Students’ Union. The protestors marched from Ganga dhaba to Chandrabhaga hostel inside the JNU campus.
On Tuesday, students, who gathered at the JNU students’ Union office for the screening of the controversial BBC documentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the 2002 Gujarat riots, claimed the varsity administration cut power and internet to stop the event, and staged a protest after stones were thrown on them.
They claimed that they were attacked when they were watching the documentary on their mobile-phones as the screening could not be held. Some alleged that the attackers were members of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), a charge the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh-affiliated student body denied.