Tag: specific

  • Mehbooba’s daughter Iltija gets ‘UAE specific’ passport with 2-year validity

    Mehbooba’s daughter Iltija gets ‘UAE specific’ passport with 2-year validity

    [ad_1]

    Srinagar: PDP president Mehbooba Mufti’s daughter Iltija has been issued a “country specific passport” for two years to allow her to study in the United Arab Emirates, brushing aside an adverse report by Jammu and Kashmir Police’s Criminal Investigation Department, officials said on Thursday.

    Iltija, 35, moved the Jammu and Kashmir High Court in February after her application for a passport was not cleared. Her passport expired on January 2 this year and she had applied for a fresh one on June 8 last year.

    The court directed the Regional Passport Office (RPO) to look into the merits of the case. Following this, Iltija, who wants to go for higher studies, has been issued a passport that is valid from April 5, 2023 to April 4, 2025, according to a letter by the RPO to the additional solicitor general.

    MS Education Academy

    “This passport will be valid only for UAE,” an official said. The passport has a stamp stating this.

    Quoting the RPO’s letter, officials said the CID/police verification report received from the special director general of police (CID), Jammu and Kashmir, in February does not favour issuing her a passport.

    The officials said Passport Officer (Srinagar) Davinder Kumar sought a detailed report from the CID on whether there was any charge sheet or FIR against Iltija. However, the department refused to share its report and reiterated its stance taken in February.

    “Why is the validity of this passport only for two years and that too country specific?” Iltija asked.

    “They have not done me any favour. I am thankful to the honourable court but the larger question remains about CID’s gross misconduct and abuse of power by weaponising passports,” she told PTI.

    She said the CID’s adverse report is full of “bald-faced lies”.

    “They are infringing on my rights by filing adverse reports to ensure my passport is not issued,” Iltija alleged.

    “To add to that, the adverse report has been classified as top secret. The only reason it is top secret is because the CID has nothing substantial against me,” Iltija said.

    On March 29, the CID sought dismissal of Iltija’s writ petition. It informed the high court that her final verification report was forwarded to the department concerned in February.

    “The petitioner has no ground to approach the court against the answering respondent because none of the rights, whether fundamental or legal, have been infringed by the answering respondent,” Senior Superintendent of Police, headquarters, CID, Jammu and Kashmir, had said.

    In March 2021, Mehbooba and her 80-year-old mother Gulshan Nazir were refused passports, citing an “adverse report” against them.

    Mehbooba’s passport expired on May 31, 2019 and she had applied for a fresh one on December 11, 2020. Her mother, wife of former chief minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, also applied for a passport in 2020 to undertake a religious pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia.

    Mehbooba’s passport application is still pending. However, authorities issued the travel document to her mother in February on the directions of the high court.

    [ad_2]
    #Mehboobas #daughter #Iltija #UAE #specific #passport #2year #validity

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Submit specific instances where CBI has not taken action against directors: SC to Swamy

    Submit specific instances where CBI has not taken action against directors: SC to Swamy

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday directed BJP leader Subramanian Swamy to submit specific instances where the CBI has not proceeded against independent directors of banks, allegedly involved in banking scams, despite the availability of material.

    The order was passed in a PIL filed by Swamy seeking a probe into the alleged role of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) officials in various banking scams.

    A bench of justices BR Gavai and Vikram Nath asked Swamy to file an affidavit in this regard within four weeks.

    “Dr Subramanian Swamy, petitioner-in-person, seeks four weeks’ time to file an affidavit so as to point out specific instances wherein, though there was material against the independent Directors, the CBI has not proceeded against them. List this matter after six weeks,” the bench said.

    The top court said if Swamy “prima facie” shows that Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has not acted against independent directors, it may examine the role of the agency.

    Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said if the role of RBI officials is made out in the process of the probe, they will be added as accused and investigated.

    He said Swamy has only made “broad propositions” and the plea lacked any particular instance.

    In his plea, Swamy has alleged that the involvement of RBI officials in scams involving various entities such as Kingfisher, Bank of Maharashtra and Yes Bank had not been probed.

    He contended that despite playing a key role in the allocation of funds to various projects, RBI nominees have not been touched by CBI inquiries from 2000 till today.

    “Not a single RBI official has been brought to justice despite RBI retaining the power to monitor, regulate, supervise, audit and direct the functioning of all banking companies in India,” the plea submitted.

    The plea also alleged that RBI officials had acted in demonstrable active connivance in direct violation of statutes, including the Reserve Bank of India Act, the Banking Regulation Act and the State Bank of India Act.

    [ad_2]
    #Submit #specific #instances #CBI #action #directors #Swamy

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )