Tag: Special

  • Hyderabad: Special drive to process passport applications for Haj on Mar 4

    Hyderabad: Special drive to process passport applications for Haj on Mar 4

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: As the last date for submitting applications for performing Haj this year is fixed as March 10 and in order to facilitate requests of Haj aspirants, the Passport Seva Kendra (PSK) in Begumpet and the Regional Passport Office are going to hold a special drive on March 4.

    The Telangana State Haj Committee in a letter has requested for processing approximately 450 passport applications of Haj aspirants. Applications of all such applicants who have been referred by the Telangana State Haj Committee will be processed in this drive, a press note informed.

    The applicants are advised to carry all originals and copies of required documents while visiting PSK, Begumpet. 

    As a special measure, this time it has been decided, to open two counters in RPO, Secunderabad premises for processing Haj applications, the press note fruther stated.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Hyderabad #Special #drive #process #passport #applications #Haj #Mar

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • HC quashes special court’s ‘cryptic’ order rejecting Navlakha’s bail plea

    HC quashes special court’s ‘cryptic’ order rejecting Navlakha’s bail plea

    [ad_1]

    Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Thursday quashed a “cryptic” order of a special court rejecting bail to activist Gautam Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, and directed the special judge to rehear his bail plea.

    A division bench of Justices A S Gadkari and P D Naik noted that the special court’s order did not contain an analysis of the evidence relied upon by the prosecution, as it directed the special judge to conclude the fresh hearing within 4 weeks.

    The 70-year-old social activist had moved HC challenging the September 5, 2022 order under the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act refusing him bail on merits.

    The high court briefly heard the arguments put forth by Navlakha’s counsel Yug Chaudhary this week but opined that the reasoning in the order of the special court was “cryptic” and said it didn’t get the benefit of a reasoned order.

    “No reason of whatever nature is given. Trial court has not given reasoning as required under section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) while rejecting bail,” the bench said on Thursday.

    The HC said the bail plea requires a fresh hearing by the special court and sent it back to the latter.

    “The special judge is requested to conclude within 4 weeks without being influenced from September 5 order and this order of today. It is made clear that this court has not made any opinion on merits,” HC said.

    Navlakha was arrested in August 2018 but was initially placed under house arrest.

    He was later moved to the Taloja Central Prison near Mumbai in April 2020 after a Supreme Court order.

    However, on November 10 last year, the Supreme Court allowed his plea to be shifted back to house arrest for a month. This was extended by another month on December 13.

    He is presently residing in Navi Mumbai in Maharashtra’s Thane district.

    The NIA opposed Navlakha’s bail plea by claiming that he had been introduced to a Pakistan Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) General for his “recruitment”. This shows his “nexus” with the spy organisation, said the federal agency.

    The case relates to alleged inflammatory speeches made at the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017 which the police claim triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial on the outskirts of the western Maharashtra city.

    [ad_2]
    #quashes #special #courts #cryptic #order #rejecting #Navlakhas #bail #plea

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • J&K Bank Special Bachat Deposit Scheme Check Features

    [ad_1]

    • Who can open a Special Bachat Deposit account with J&K Bank?

    Special Bachat Deposit account can be opened by individuals, either singly or jointly, Parents/ Guardians on behalf of minors.

    • What is the minimum Average Monthly Balance required to be maintained?
       Minimum AMB of Rs. 10000/-.
    • What are the benefits of the Special Bachat Deposit Scheme?
      You can avail the following benefits:
      • Free cash withdrawals over the counter: 30 withdrawals per half year.
      • Free accidental death insurance cover of Rs.2.00 lacs.
      • International Gold Debit Card with withdrawal limit of Rs. 1.00 lacs per day and shopping limit of Rs. 1.50 lacs per day.
      • Special discount in charges on cash deposit at Base and Non-Base Business Units.
      • Free e-banking / m-banking facility.

    [ad_2]
    #Bank #Special #Bachat #Deposit #Scheme #Check #Features

    ( With inputs from : kashmirpublication.in )

  • Dark money and special deals: How Leonard Leo and his friends benefited from his judicial activism

    Dark money and special deals: How Leonard Leo and his friends benefited from his judicial activism

    [ad_1]

    A POLITICO investigation based on dozens of financial, property and public records dating from 2000 to 2021 found that Leo’s lifestyle took a lavish turn beginning in 2016, the year he was tapped as an unpaid adviser to incoming President Donald Trump on Supreme Court justices. It’s the same period during which he erected a for-profit ecosystem around his longtime nonprofit empire that is shielded from taxes. Leo was executive vice president of The Federalist Society at the time.

    The for-profit and nonprofit entities share more than just Leo’s involvement: The same longtime ally managing the books for two of his new leading nonprofits, Neil Corkery, is also chief financial officer of Leo’s for-profit company, POLITICO confirmed in IRS filings. One of those nonprofits paid the for-profit $33.8 million over two years.

    “That’s a classic type of situation the IRS looks into if it appears you [via a nonprofit] are shoveling money to yourself in a for-profit context,” said Philip Hackney, an expert on tax law and charities who worked in the Office of the Chief Counsel at the IRS.

    Leo’s Virginia-based CRC Advisors — a political consulting firm that was created in 2020 and for which he is chairman — declined to say what services it provided for the $43 million payments.

    POLITICO also asked CRC how much of the millions in spending since 2016 by his aligned nonprofits Leo has kept for himself and about concerns by ethics experts that the lack of disclosure underscores the need for greater transparency around the court. Leo did not respond to multiple requests for comment. CRC also did not comment on Corkery’s role.

    “CRC Advisors puts its clients’ money to work more effectively than any other enterprise of its sort and we are blessed to be able to have this kind of impact in our country,” the company said in a statement.

    A web of nonprofits

    The majority of CRC’s payments came through The 85 Fund, a rebranded dark money group that Leo has said he plans to use to fund conservative causes nationwide. Corkery and his wife, Ann, founded and ran the nonprofit under a different name for more than a decade, during which time Leo directed funds toward it. Such nonprofits are exempt from taxes and not required to disclose donors. It is now run by Carrie Severino, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas.

    The official address for The 85 Fund, which has appeared for at least ten years on paperwork registering dark-money groups associated with Leo, is Suite 268 of a building in the Georgetown neighborhood of DC. It houses a UPS store, where an employee said there are no suites, only mailbox rentals.

    Corkery “possesses the organization’s books and records” for The 85 Fund and Leo’s Marble Freedom Trust, which received the $1.6 billion, according to IRS filings. The two groups appear to have no websites, logos or official phone numbers other than Corkery’s in federal filings.

    For more than a decade the Corkerys have also been board members or treasurers of organizations aligned with Leo that spent on campaigns opposing same-sex marriage and abortion rights and promoting judicial appointments.

    CRC did not disclose Corkery’s CFO position in its annual report — which the state requires for “all principal officers” — or in incorporation filings in the state of Virginia. Corkery is listed as a CRC “beneficial owner” in company paperwork filed in Washington DC.

    Both Hackney, the former IRS official, and Marcus Owens, who began working at the IRS under President Gerald Ford and directed the IRS’s division on tax-exempt organizations for a decade under Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, said the broader concern is whether federal tax laws are being abused, and that depends on whether the nonprofits are paying CRC fair market rates for whatever services are rendered.

    “It’s an extraordinary amount of money for a fairly intangible or indistinct product or service,” said Owens.

    “That’s where the big problem is going to lie, in whether the goods and services were real and whether they were provided at no more than fair market value,” said Owens, who helped design and enforce federal programs for exempt organizations. Excess payments can trigger penalties and even revocation of tax exempt status, he said.

    In its 2020 IRS filing, the 85 Fund stated it did not “engage in any excess benefit transaction.”

    Trump’s ‘judge whisperer’

    The payments to CRC over two years from Leo-aligned nonprofits represent an increase over the already significant $15 million a separate Leo for-profit entity, known as BH Group, took in over four years during Supreme court nomination public relations campaigns beginning in 2016.

    The spending by Leo-aligned non-profits on his for-profit businesses coincided with changes in his personal lifestyle and finances. IRS and other public records between 2016 and 2020 show a major expansion of Leo’s personal wealth that coincided with the start of his work for Trump and the creation of his own for-profit entity called BH Group. Both happened in 2016.

    Over the two decades before he became Trump’s “judge whisperer,” Leo had maintained a largely middle-class lifestyle directing one of Washington D.C.’s many nonprofit organizations.

    Since 2016, however, his recent wealth accumulation has included two new mansions in Maine, four new cars, private school tuition for his children, hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations to Catholic causes and a wine buyer and locker at Morton’s Steakhouse, according to POLITICO’s review of public records.

    At least two of Leo’s former Federalist Society colleagues — who were also bringing in hundreds of thousands of dollars from Leo’s aligned groups while working for the society — now work at CRC.

    “If millions of dollars in dark money are sloshing around, it makes it really easy for people on the inside to take a cut,” said Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, a professor and expert on money in politics at Stetson University College of Law. Political consultants for political candidates often reap significant profits. “That behavior is, unfortunately, now showing in the judicial nominating process,” she said.

    “There are all sorts of dimensions in which you could reform the courts, but putting more transparency around the money that’s going into judicial appointments would be a good place to start,” said Torres-Spelliscy.

    There are no campaign finance laws or ethics rules governing the Supreme Court and its nine justices serving lifetime terms. Justices have chosen to make annual disclosures on outside income, though those forms have been criticized for having serious gaps.

    Questions for the Federalist Society

    The court’s 2022 decision overturning half a century of the federal right to abortion was widely seen as a victory for the conservative legal movement led by Leo.

    Trump picked his court nominees from a list drawn up by Leo, who then served as his unofficial adviser in the White House. A constellation of outside groups affiliated with Leo poured tens of millions of dollars in anonymous donor funds into promoting those nominees — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — thereby cementing a new conservative majority for the next generation.

    In its statement, CRC likened itself to political consultants on the left that work with progressive nonprofits and foundations.

    The Federalist Society did not respond to a request for comment. An educational institution that has for decades expressly rejected inserting itself into political campaigns, the Federalist Society remains exempt from taxes because “it is organized exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes,” according to its IRS filings.

    Founded in 1982 as a safe harbor for conservatives in academia, the Federalist Society has fought to preserve its brand as the premier debating society for conservatives, said Steven Teles, a Johns Hopkins University political science professor who authored a book on the rise of the conservative legal movement. Rampant fundraising and political activism have been strictly off limits.

    “Having gone through all of the early history of the Federalist Society, I don’t think anybody looked at this and thought ‘there’s a racket there,’” said Teles. “They wanted to create something that was so high-minded and so principled that, in a way, it would also make dominant liberalism look bad, mainly by showing how much more intellectual they were.”

    Steven Calabresi, Leo’s fellow co-chairman, and President Eugene Meyer have sought to “keep distance” from Leo’s activities, said Teles, including by granting leaves of absence for Leo around his advocacy work, he said. Still, the Federalist Society has become financially intertwined with Leo, receiving $5.6 million in grant money from The 85 Fund in 2020.

    In an interview, Calabresi said he didn’t know anything about Leo’s work beyond the confines of the Federalist Society.

    “I personally don’t believe that Leonard is motivated by greed,” he said. “I think Leonard is motivated by ideology and ideas. I do think he likes to live a high-rolling lifestyle, but I don’t think he’s in the business because of the money.”

    Meyer did not respond to a request for comment.

    Flying too high?

    The 57-year-old Leo has been depicted in news reports as a deeply religious man driven by his personal and spiritual beliefs, mainly his Catholic faith. He attends mass daily. Allies liken him to a philanthropic middle man. But his relatively recent lavish lifestyle illustrates the millions of dollars that helped make a court that’s becoming an epicenter of the nation’s intensifying culture wars.

    Hackney, the former IRS official, said that while there’s no explicit prohibition on conflicts of interest in U.S. tax law, IRS investigations are typically triggered when an individual creates a nonprofit that then pays a for-profit that “makes them very wealthy,” he said.

    Hackney cited the chief executive of the National Rifle Association Wayne LaPierre as a cautionary tale. In 2020, the New York attorney general brought a lawsuit against the NRA alleging LaPierre and others used NRA assets for their own benefit in violation of nonprofit laws. While the case is unlikely to go to trial, the NRA has seen a steep decline in donations and is facing insolvency.

    “He basically flew too close to the sun. That’s the question for Leonard Leo. Is he flying too close to the sun?” said Hackney, now associate professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.

    “In the case of somebody like Leonard Leo, he’s obviously been very successful in what he does, so what you pay him is hard to put a value on,” he said. Also, a key issue in LaPierre’s case is that the NRA board was allegedly presented with false information.

    Leo left his post as executive director of The Federalist Society in 2020 to begin CRC Advisors, though he remains a co-chairman.

    Between 2000 and 2016, Leo earned somewhere between $125,000 and $435,000 annually, according to Federalist Society IRS filings. His wife, Sally, has listed her occupation as “homemaker,” and a review of public records did not find major assets other than his home prior to 2016.

    Before purchasing his McLean, Virginia, home in 2010 with a fixed-rate loan from the Federal Housing Administration, Leo listed a three-bedroom rental apartment in Arlington as his mailing address, according to a 2006 filing with the Federal Election Administration.

    One month after Leo formed his BH Group in 2016, Trump released an updated list of conservative jurists who were suitable candidates for nomination to the Supreme Court that included Neil Gorsuch. Leo was the first person from Trump’s team to reach out to Gorsuch in December of 2016.

    Thereafter, Leo’s personal wealth appears to have skyrocketed in tandem with major victories on the road to an ultraconservative court.

    Weeks after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, in August of 2018, Leo paid off the mortgage on his home in Virginia after making numerous renovations.

    Just months after that — and one day before the Senate took a controversial procedural vote clearing the way for Kavanaugh’s appointment to replace Kennedy — Leo bought a second home, a $3.3 million mansion in Mount Desert, Maine.

    The affluent seaside village is a haven for a number of heirs to Gilded Age oil, industrial and banking barons like the Rockefellers and Morgans. The seller was an heir to chemical giant W.R. Grace chairman and CEO J. Peter Grace.

    It was there he hosted a controversial fundraiser for Sen. Susan Collins, the Maine Republican whose vote for Kavanaugh was considered decisive. A year later, on July 3, 2019 — and about a month after the Washington Post first revealed the 11-bedroom mansion’s existence — that mortgage too was paid in full, according to a lien discharge record. Following apparent improvements, the home was assessed for $4.4 million in 2022.

    Meanwhile, in 2021, the same P.O. Box used to purchase Leo’s first mansion was used to buy another home about a mile away in Mount Desert for $1.65 million. This one was purchased from an heir to the financier and philanthropist Richard K. Mellon.

    During that same period, Leo and his wife, Sally, became “Stewards of Saint Peter,” a designation given to those pledging more than $1 million to Vatican initiatives, sponsored events and made multiple additional donations ranging from $10,000 to $75,000 to Catholic charitable causes and $75,000 to a COVID relief fund in Maine.

    Leo also acquired a wine locker at Morton’s Steakhouse and hired the chief steward at the Trump International Hotel as his wine buyer, according to the book, “Supreme Ambition.”

    A widening circle of friends

    Leo has maintained close ties to at least one Supreme Court justice, Clarence Thomas. During a 2017 award ceremony, Thomas’s wife, Virginia, gave Leo an award and called him “a mentor” during a ceremony at Trump Hotel.

    “He has many hats … he doesn’t really tell all that he does,” said Thomas, though Leo is “an amazing cook, he knows food and wine.”

    Justices are not subject to the same conflict of interest rules as members of Congress, the executive branch and other U.S. judges.

    But Leo’s close relationship with the Thomases raises questions about his access to other justices he campaigned for, now that they are issuing the rulings his donors desire, said Kyle Herrig, president of Accountable.US, a non-partisan progressive group that investigates corporate influence in politics.

    Many of Leo’s closest associates have also taken in significant sums from his network, in many cases via their own self-run entities.

    Leo’s friend Ronald Cass — Leo was best man at his wedding — is listed along with his wife as the sole officer of The Center for the Rule of Law, a nonprofit registered to their home address.

    The nonprofit, which was created in 2006 and described as an independent “center of international scholars analyzing rule of law issues,” doesn’t have much of a footprint. The only website that purports to represent it — it contains a “chairman’s statement” from Cass and is cited in at least one university law journal — appears to either be inactive or hacked, given a series of links at the bottom of the page to erotic websites. Cass is also president of his own legal consulting business, Cass & Associates, PC in Virginia.

    Cass’s group received $2.9 million between 2017 and 2019 from Leo’s 85 Fund for consulting, according to IRS filings. The main evidence of work Cass’s group did for The 85 Fund is a 2016 amicus brief in an immigration-related case. During Gorsuch’s nomination process, Cass also authored newspaper columns pressing for his confirmation.

    Cass and his wife, Susan, did not respond to two emailed requests for information on what consulting services were provided.

    Leo associates also made significant money while still working full time for the nonprofit Federalist Society.

    Maria Marshall, previously Leo’s director of operations at the Federalist Society and a former scheduling director for Collins, is listed as the sole officer of YAS LLC, which is registered in Washington and received $775,000 over three years from the Leo-connected Rule of Law Trust while Marshall worked at the Federalist Society.

    CRC Advisors president Jonathan Bunch received $1.54 million for “consulting” for the Rule of Law Trust in 2018, the same year the Federalist Society listed him as working 40 hours a week with a salary of $156,625, according to the group’s IRS filing. Both Bunch and Marshall, who joined Leo’s CRC Advisors fulltime in 2020, did not respond to requests for comment on these side businesses.

    On the second day of hearings to confirm Justice Amy Coney Barrett in October of 2020, Bunch closed on a $1.285 million waterfront home on the Chesapeake Bay.

    The wealth accumulation of Leo and a small circle of associates shows how they benefited from the making of the court’s current conservative majority, said Herrig.

    “His lifestyle upgrade was made possible by using his network of nonprofits to pour money into his for profit consulting firm,” he said. “This raises serious questions about how he will spend the $1.6 billion from a rightwing billionaire.”

    [ad_2]
    #Dark #money #special #deals #Leonard #Leo #friends #benefited #judicial #activism
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Male activists in Bangalore organise special ‘puja’ for Elon Musk

    Male activists in Bangalore organise special ‘puja’ for Elon Musk

    [ad_1]

    Bengaluru: A group of male activists from the Save Indian Family Federation (SIFF) NGO, which fights for men’s rights, organised a special ‘puja’ here for Tesla and Twitter CEO Elon Musk and thanked him for purchasing the micro-blogging platform “allowing men to express their views against the oppression of authorities”.

    The video of the incident that took place in the city’s Freedom Park has gone viral on social media.

    In a Twitter post on Monday, the NGO said that “men’s Activists of SIFF used to be often shadow banned from Twitter by previous woke admins of the company”.

    “After Elon Musk fired them, the MRAs have got back their right to free speech.”

    The “special worshipping” was done on the sidelines of a protest against PILs on marital rape in the Supreme Court.

    The post by the activists stated “SIFF members are worshipping guru Elon Musk in Bengaluru, India for purchasing Twitter and allowing men to express their views against the oppression of authorities”.

    The activists were seen in the video with banners that read “mens lives matters” and “men have a right to peaceful existence”

    The members lit incense sticks before a portrait of the tech billionaire and chanted “Elan Muskaya Namaha”, “Elon Musk ki Jaia, “Elon Musk se kuch seekho Adani, Ambani”.

    SIFF members maintained that laws on rape, domestic violence and dowry are biased against men which are leading to lodging of false cases against them.

    “The law is twisted to create fear among men rather than delivering justice to the victims. The members clarified that at the same time they are not against the laws relating to sexual violence in marriage or relationship, they are concerned with the abuse of laws,” they added.

    [ad_2]
    #Male #activists #Bangalore #organise #special #puja #Elon #Musk

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Women’s T20 World Cup: It’s a pretty special effort from the group, says Meg Lanning

    Women’s T20 World Cup: It’s a pretty special effort from the group, says Meg Lanning

    [ad_1]

    Cape Town: After winning the ICC Women’s T20 World Cup for a record sixth time, Australia captain Meg Lanning acknowledged her side for putting in a ‘pretty special effort’, which saw them go undefeated throughout the tournament, including beating South Africa in the final by 19 runs.

    “It’s a pretty special effort from the group. All teams came hard at us – we knew that was going to happen. But we performed well throughout the tournament, so super proud. We felt like it was a good score, but we had to bowl well.”

    “The wicket wasn’t as good as it was in the semi-final. We felt confident if we could hit the right lengths and target the stumps. We had to put pressure on South Africa,” said Meg after the match ended.

    With the title win at Cape Town, Meg also overtook Ricky Ponting for captain with the greatest number of ICC titles. She had previously captained Australia to 2014, 2018 and 2020 T20 World Cup wins and 2022 ODI World Cup title, apart from a gold medal in the 2022 Commonwealth Games.

    “We knew it would be an amazing atmosphere, which it was. It was a great event. It was about keeping things simple when the pressure is on, and getting things done. Nice to finish off with a win with this group. It’s a special group. Not just the players, but also the support staff that put in a lot of work behind the scenes, and allow us to go out and play our cricket,” she added.

    The 2023 Women’s T20 World Cup victory came after Meg returned to the sport after a five-month break. Co-incidentally, the victory at Cape Town was Meg’s 100th T20I as captain of Australia. Beth Mooney, Player of the Match in the final with a breezy 74, was thrilled to have Meg, also her coffee and game-day breakfast buddy, back to playing the sport.

    “When Meg retires – hopefully not for a few more years, hope you’re listening Meg – she’ll go down as one of the greatest leaders, not just in cricket but in sport and just generally as well. She’s got an immense cricket brain.”

    “She’s cool, calm and collected under pressure and she’s got empathy as well, she understands how people feel in certain situations because she’s been there before and she’s experienced a lot as a person and as a leader and as a cricketer. Absolutely she’ll go down as one of the greatest ever for our team and we’re very lucky to have her.”

    [ad_2]
    #Womens #T20 #World #Cup #pretty #special #effort #group #Meg #Lanning

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Special court should be careful before extending probe in anti-terror cases: HC

    Special court should be careful before extending probe in anti-terror cases: HC

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Delhi High Court said on Friday that before granting further extension to a probe agency to complete investigation in a case lodged under the anti-terror law, a special court has to apply its mind to ascertain the reasonable time required and extend the period of custody of accused for a period up to 90 days.

    The high court said the report of public prosecutor is not required to be provided to the accused at the stage of grant of extension of remand for continued investigation.

    However, the “accused cannot be a silent spectator” and the special court would be required to take into consideration his submissions while examining the report regarding the progress of investigation and the reasons for seeking further detention for continued probe, it said.

    “As regards the issue whenever a report of the public prosecutor is presented for seeking extension of time for investigation beyond 90 days, the special court will apply its mind to find out the reasonable time required to complete the investigation and extend the period of custody for such period upto 90 days…

    “Subject to the right of the investigating agency to seek further extension of remand if remand for less than 90 days is granted, based on a fresh report of the public prosecutor, upto a maximum of 90 days,” a bench of Justices Mukta Gupta and Anish Dayal said.

    The high court said the special court would also be required to satisfy itself from the investigation carried out that there is sufficient material to form a reasonable belief that prima facie an offence under anti-terror law Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) is made out.

    It said no reasons with regard to this will be required to be reflected in the order as the same would entail disclosure of the investigation carried out.

    The bench in its 81-page judgement, dealt with the common issues raised in 10 appeals regarding the validity of extension of the period of detention beyond 90 days under Section 43D(2)(b) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

    In these cases, the period of detention of the accused and investigation was extended from 90 days to 180 days.

    Section 43 D (2) of the anti-terror law grants 90 days to the investigating agency to complete its probe and file the charge sheet. It, however, states if it is not possible to complete the investigation within that period, the court concerned may extend the deadline up to 180 days.

    The high court said the essential requirements to be seen by the special court while extending the remand of the accused to complete the investigation include reasons evidencing the personal satisfaction of the public prosecutor regarding the progress of investigation made.

    The other two requirements are “reasons indicating why the investigation could not be completed within the period of 90 days and further investigation required to be carried out for which extended period of time is necessary”.

    All these three essential ingredients must form part of the public prosecutor’s report, based on which the special court will arrive at the satisfaction to extend the period of remand, the bench said.

    The high court dismissed several of the appeals including those of accused Zeeshan Qamar, Mizha Siddeeque and Shifa Haris who had challenged the special court’s orders granting extension of time for investigation and remand, leading to continued detention.

    It, however, granted default bail to accused Mushab Anwar and Dr. Rahees Rasheed and directed that they be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs 1 lakh with two sureties of the like amount.

    The high court was informed that accused Mohd. Manan Dar has already been granted bail by the trial court.

    [ad_2]
    #Special #court #careful #extending #probe #antiterror #cases

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • JKBOSE Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Result for Special (Supplementary) Kashmir Private – TheNewsCaravan Newspaper

    JKBOSE Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Result for Special (Supplementary) Kashmir Private – TheNewsCaravan Newspaper

    [ad_1]

    The Jammu and Kashmir Board of School Education (JKBOSE) has announced the result for the Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Kashmir Private exams. The results have been declared on the official website of JKBOSE at jkbose.ac.in.

    The Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Kashmir Private exams were conducted in October 2022. A large number of students had appeared for the exams from various private schools across the Kashmir division.

    JKBOSE Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Result for Special (Supplementary) Kashmir Private 1


    Direct LINK To Check the Result – Click Here


    To check the JKBOSE Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Kashmir Private result, candidates need to follow the below-mentioned steps:

    1. Visit the official website of JKBOSE at jkbose.ac.in.
    2. Click on the “Results” tab on the homepage.
    3. Select “Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Kashmir Private” from the list of available results.
    4. Enter the roll number and other required details in the fields provided.
    5. Click on the “Submit” button.
    6. The result will be displayed on the screen.

    Candidates are advised to carefully check the result and download it for future reference. The result will contain details such as the candidate’s name, roll number, marks obtained in each subject, and the total marks obtained.

    The JKBOSE has also issued a notification stating that candidates who have any objections with regard to their result can submit their objections within the prescribed time limit. The objections should be submitted in writing along with all the necessary documents.

    Students who have passed the Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Kashmir Private exams can now apply for admission to various colleges and universities.

    [ad_2]
    #JKBOSE #Class #12th #BiAnnual #Result #Special #Supplementary #Kashmir #Private #TheNewsCaravan #Newspaper

    ( With inputs from : www.TheNewsCaravan.com )

  • JKBOSE Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Result Special (Supplementary) Jammu Private released – TheNewsCaravan Newspaper

    JKBOSE Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Result Special (Supplementary) Jammu Private released – TheNewsCaravan Newspaper

    [ad_1]

    The Jammu and Kashmir Board of School Education (JKBOSE) has declared the results for the Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Jammu Private exams. The results were announced on the official website of JKBOSE at jkbose.ac.in.

    The Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Jammu Private exams were conducted in October 2022. A significant number of students had appeared for the exams from various private schools across the Jammu division.

    JKBOSE Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Result Special (Supplementary) Jammu Private released 1

    Direct LINK To Check the Result – Click Here


    To check the JKBOSE Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Jammu Private result, candidates need to follow the below-mentioned steps:

    1. Visit the official website of JKBOSE at jkbose.ac.in
    2. Click on the “Results” tab on the homepage.
    3. Select “Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Jammu Private” from the list of available results.
    4. Enter the roll number and other required details in the fields provided.
    5. Click on the “Submit” button.
    6. The result will be displayed on the screen.

    Candidates are advised to verify the result carefully and download it for future reference. The result will contain details such as the candidate’s name, roll number, marks obtained in each subject, and the total marks obtained.

    Students who have passed the Higher Secondary Part II (Class 12th) Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Jammu Private exams can now apply for admission to various colleges and universities. Candidates are advised to keep visiting the official website of JKBOSE for further updates regarding the admission process.

    [ad_2]
    #JKBOSE #Class #12th #BiAnnual #Result #Special #Supplementary #Jammu #Private #released #TheNewsCaravan #Newspaper

    ( With inputs from : www.TheNewsCaravan.com )

  • JKBOSE Releases Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Leh Private Result – TheNewsCaravan Newspaper

    JKBOSE Releases Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Leh Private Result – TheNewsCaravan Newspaper

    [ad_1]

    The Jammu and Kashmir Board of School Education (JKBOSE) has announced the results for the Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Leh Private exams. The results were released on the official website of JKBOSE at jkbose.ac.in.

    The Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Leh Private exams were conducted in October 2022. A large number of students had appeared for the exams from various private schools across the Leh division.

    JKBOSE Releases Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Leh Private Result 1

    To check the JKBOSE Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Leh Private result, candidates need to follow the below-mentioned steps:

    Direct LINK To Check the Result – Click Here


    Also Check: JKBOSE Class 10th Result declared for Winter Zone Jammu Division, Check Here

    1. Visit the official website of JKBOSE at jkbose.ac.in
    2. Click on the “Results” tab on the homepage.
    3. Select “Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Leh Private” from the list of available results.
    4. Enter the roll number and other required details in the fields provided.
    5. Click on the “Submit” button.
    6. The result will be displayed on the screen.

    Candidates are advised to check the result carefully and download it for future reference. The result will contain details such as the candidate’s name, roll number, marks obtained in each subject, and the total marks obtained.

    JKBOSE has also released a notification stating that candidates who have any objections with regard to their result can submit their objections within the prescribed time limit. The objections should be submitted in writing along with all the necessary documents.

    Students who have qualified the Class 12th Bi-Annual 2022 Special (Supplementary) Leh Private exams can now apply for admission to various colleges and universities. Candidates are advised to keep visiting the official website of JKBOSE for further updates regarding the admission process.

    [ad_2]
    #JKBOSE #Releases #Class #12th #BiAnnual #Special #Supplementary #Leh #Private #Result #TheNewsCaravan #Newspaper

    ( With inputs from : www.TheNewsCaravan.com )