Tag: reopened

  • Elon Musk reopened Twitter for political ad business. But is it too late?

    Elon Musk reopened Twitter for political ad business. But is it too late?

    [ad_1]

    twitter violent speech 73846

    The platform’s new ad verification process and disclosure mechanisms are rudimentary so far, relying on both potential advertisers and members of the public to fill out a form hosted by Google, unusual for a tech company that would typically be expected to build most of its own web features.

    Both Republican and Democratic digital operatives said they expect Twitter advertising will eventually pick up as campaigns seek to meet voters wherever they are, including on the Musk-owned platform. But the same concerns about Twitter’s “brand safety” driving the platform’s overall advertising decline remain. Twitter’s rollout of the new ad policy, including the use of Google Forms, is not exactly inspiring confidence.

    “It’s been several years since political advertisers have used Twitter, so it’s not just in our muscle memory or our toolbox in the way that some other things would be,” said Eric Wilson, a Republican digital strategist and director of the Center for Campaign Innovation, which studies campaign practices. “And then there is a lot of uncertainty about Twitter and who is using it.”

    Twitter stopped accepting political advertising in 2019, with then-CEO Jack Dorsey saying political message reach should be “earned, not bought.” Political ads accounted for only a small share of the company’s revenue prior to the ban, Twitter said at the time.

    The slow start to political advertising could partially reflect the timing. Overall political advertising is relatively low across all digital platforms in February of an off election year. Campaigns typically pick up spending on digital advertising ahead of competitive elections beginning in the fall ahead of the election year.

    But campaigns also have to consider some of the “brand safety” issues that have caused other advertisers to leave or reconsider their presence on the platform, said Mark Jablonowski, president of DSPolitical, a digital advertising firm that works with Democratic candidates and causes.

    The issue is not necessarily about Musk’s professed political beliefs, Jablonowski said, but reflects campaigns needing the ability to get their message across in an environment where content policies do not “amplify misinformation.”

    Twitter’s policies define political advertising as ads that advocate for or against a candidate or party, appeal for votes or financial support related to an election or are paid for by registered political groups. For now, the platform is also allowing only certain kinds of political ads — sponsored posts, for example, but not sponsored hashtags. The policies also say ads cannot include false or misleading content, although it’s not clear how that policy will be enforced. Since Musk bought Twitter, he has expanded the use of community notes, which allow users to comment on others tweets intending to correct misinformation, but has also eliminated the platform’s policy of misinformation related to Covid-19 and has faced criticism for allowing back users previously suspended for spreading misinformation.

    Advertisers can request verification to run political ads by submitting information via a Google Form. The company follows up with those who have submitted, with the process expected to take between two and four weeks, according to Twitter’s website. It is not clear how many campaigns have attempted to be verified so they can run ads.

    There is similarly a Google Form where users can request information on political ads running on Twitter. By contrast, Meta has a verification process within its website and a public ad library on its website, where all political ads are searchable.

    After POLITICO requested data on ad disclosures so far, Twitter responded on Feb. 27 saying “there are no existing political ads to disclose at this time.” The company did not respond to follow-up questions about whether campaigns or groups were going through its verification process to run ads.

    “It’s apparent that there’s a resource crunch at Twitter if they’re using a Google form for the verification process,” Jablonowski said. “It seems like they want the revenue from political advertising but don’t have the infrastructure to support it.”

    Polling from the Pew Research Center in 2021 found that less than 1 in 4 U.S. adults use Twitter, while nearly 70 percent use Facebook.

    Still, the minority of adults who use Twitter are highly interested in politics. Campaigns and groups are likely to try out the platform eventually, particularly as digital advertising remains generally cheap and other methods of running ads will become more saturated as elections approach.

    “Campaign advertising follows voters’ eyeballs,” Wilson said.

    [ad_2]
    #Elon #Musk #reopened #Twitter #political #business #late
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Anti-CAA case against Akhil Gogoi reopened by Spl NIA Court

    Anti-CAA case against Akhil Gogoi reopened by Spl NIA Court

    [ad_1]

    Guwahati: The Special NIA Court on Thursday reopened an anti-CAA case against Assam MLA Akhil Gogoi and his three associates following a directive of the Gauhati High Court.

    On the first day, Gogoi’s advocate presented the Supreme Court’s order giving protection from arrest till February 24 in connection with the case related to anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act stir and suspected Maoist links.

    Considering the apex court ruling, Special NIA Judge Pranjal Das deferred the hearing and listed the case on February 28.

    Hundreds of Gogoi’s supporters waited outside the court premises to express solidarity with the Raijor Dal chief.

    On February 9, the Gauhati High Court had allowed the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to frame charges against Gogoi and three others in the case. Its order had come on an appeal of the NIA challenging the order of the Special NIA Court giving clean chit to the four.

    The other three accused were Dhaijya Konwar, Bittu Sonowal and Manash Konwar, all of whom had got bail in the NIA case and were released from the jail.

    Gogoi was the only one whose bail was rejected by the court and he was released after spending 567 days in jail once the Special NIA Judge Pranjal Das had cleared him along with the three others of all charges.

    The NIA was investigating two cases of Gogoi related to anti-CAA violence. In one of those, the Special NIA Court had granted him bail, which was upheld by the Gauhati High Court too in April 2021 after the probe agency challenged it.

    The RTI activist-cum-peasant leader continued to be in judicial custody as his bail was rejected in the second case related to anti-CAA violence and was being investigated by the NIA.

    Later, the Special NIA Court on July 1, 2021 released Gogoi and his three associates for their alleged role in the violent anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act stir in the state in December 2019 and observed there was nothing to indicate “talk of blockade” threatened the country’s economic security or was “a terrorist act.”

    The NIA then moved the Gauhati High Court appealing to allow the agency to frame charges under various sections, including sedition, of the IPC and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

    In a strongly worded judgement, the Special NIA Court had said that in the interests of justice, it found the conduct and approach of the investigating authority in the case to be “discouraging”, to say the least.

    “The court has high expectations from a premier investigating agency like the NIA, entrusted with the profoundly important task of protecting our country and us, citizens from the menace of terrorism.

    “The court hopes and expects that, such high standards will be upheld, for sake of the country and this one will be just an exception,” the Special NIA Judge Pranjal Das had said in his order.

    Gogoi, who contested as Independent from Sibsagar in 2021, became the first Assamese to win an election remaining behind the bars without any physical campaigning.

    He also became the first in Assam Assembly to take oath on May 21, 2021 as a prisoner MLA, coming from jail on a special permission by the court.

    [ad_2]
    #AntiCAA #case #Akhil #Gogoi #reopened #Spl #NIA #Court

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )