Tag: Removal

mCaffeine Coffee & AHA Exfoliating Body Wash 300ml for Cleansing, Tan Removal & Exfoliation | Shower Gel with Scrub particles for Men & Women, Espresso Range

Price: [price_with_discount]
(as of [price_update_date] – Details)

[ad_1]
With real Coffee that makes your shower feel like sipping coffee at a cafe.
Product Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 9 x 9 x 15.5 cm; 286.33 Grams
Date First Available ‏ : ‎ 27 September 2021
Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ Ultra Beauty Care,Pvt.Ltd
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09H7HQQDW
Item model number ‏ : ‎ MCaf107
Country of Origin ‏ : ‎ India
Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ Ultra Beauty Care,Pvt.Ltd, Plot No. C-15,M.I.D.C,Five Star Industrial Area,Shendra,Aurangabad (M.S)431201.Mfg LicNo.32-AD/C/016
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 286 g
Item Dimensions LxWxH ‏ : ‎ 9 x 9 x 15.5 Centimeters
Net Quantity ‏ : ‎ 1 count
Generic Name ‏ : ‎ Body Wash
REAL CAFFEINATORS, REAL RESULTS: More than 97% of subjects saw a smoother, softer and supple skin after using the Espresso Coffee Body Wash. More than 97% of of them also agreed that the body wash helped in removing dead skin.
SUPERFOOD COFFEE AT THE CORE: For us Coffee is not just a beverage, it’s the secret to healthy skin. Coffee has a plethora of benefits and we ensure you reap those when using our products. Coffee exfoliates, softens & smoothens skin. Coffee Oil energizes & polishes the skin. Coffee is also a rich source of Caffeine. Caffeine tones & soothes the skin.
JUST GOOD, NOTHING BAD: Our mission is to get you addicted to good and get you off of all the bad. Espresso Coffee Body Wash is free from harmful chemicals, SLS, Paraben, Mineral Oil and everything that can be bad for your skin.
SATISFY YOUR SKIN’S COFFEE CRAVINGS: Coffee is never enough and can never be. So, after using the Espresso Coffee Body Wash, if your skin craves more Coffee then you can always reach out to Coffee Body Lotion and Coffee Body Polishing Oil, all are equally caffeinating and indulging.
GOOD FOR YOU, GOOD FOR THE PLANET: mCaffeine is India’s first caffeinated personal care brand focussed on getting you addicted to the good of coffee-infused self-care. Our products are gender-neutral and suitable for all skin & hair types making them ideal for anyone who wishes to enhance their personal care regimen. We are a 100% Vegan, PETA Certified, and Cruelty-free brand with Zero Plastic Footprint.

[ad_2]
#mCaffeine #Coffee #AHA #Exfoliating #Body #Wash #300ml #Cleansing #Tan #Removal #Exfoliation #Shower #Gel #Scrub #particles #Men #Women #Espresso #Range

February 11, 2023
SC to hear in May pleas concerning removal of encroachments from railway land in Haldwani

[ad_1]
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it would hear in May the pleas on which it had last month stayed the Uttarakhand High Court’s order for removal of encroachments from 29 acres of land claimed by the railways in Haldwani.
The matter came up for hearing before a bench of Justices SK Kaul and Manoj Misra, which listed it for hearing on May 2.
On January 5, the top court had stayed the high court order for removal of encroachments from the 29 acres of land claimed by the railways in Haldwani, terming it a “human issue” and saying 50,000 people cannot be uprooted overnight.
“We do believe that a workable arrangement is necessary to segregate people who may have no rights in the land and those who have…. Coupled with schemes of rehabilitation which may already exist while recognising the need of the railways,” it had said.
During Tuesday’s hearing, the bench was requested to grant eight weeks’ time to authorities to work out a solution as indicated by the court last month.
According to the railways, there are 4,365 encroachers on the land, while the occupants were earlier staging protests in Haldwani, asserting that they were the rightful owners of the land.
Nearly 50,000 people, a majority of them Muslims, belonging to more than 4,000 families reside on the disputed land.
Observing that many of the occupants have claimed that they have been residing there for more than 50 years, the apex court had last month observed that there was a “human angle” to the problem and the authorities concerned had to find a “practical way out”.

It had also issued notices to the railways and the Uttarakhand government, seeking their responses to a batch of pleas challenging the high court order for removal of encroachments.
In its December 20 last year order, the high court had said, “The railway authorities, in coordination with the district administration, and if need be, with any other paramilitary forces, shall immediately, after giving a week’s notice to the occupants over the railway land, ask them to vacate the land within the aforesaid period.”
The apex court had, however, said since the people sought to be removed from the land have been staying there for several years, some rehabilitation has to be found for them.
Staying the high court’s directions, the apex court had said there had to be complete restraint on any further occupation of land and construction whether by the existing occupants or anyone else.
The high court had ordered demolition of constructions on the alleged encroached railway land at Banbhoolpura in Haldwani.
It had directed that a week’s notice be given to the encroachers, after which the encroachments should be demolished.
The residents have submitted in their plea that the high court has gravely erred in passing the impugned order, despite being aware of the fact that proceedings with regard to the title of the residents, including the petitioners, are pending before the district magistrate.
The petitioners have claimed that they possess documents that clearly establish their title and valid occupation.
[ad_2]
#hear #pleas #removal #encroachments #railway #land #Haldwani
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

February 7, 2023
Forceful removal of innerwear of minor girls equivalent to rape: Calcutta HC

[ad_1]
Kolkata: Forceful removal of the innerwear of a minor girl is equivalent to rape even if rape, as per medical terms, has not been done by the accused or convict, the Calcutta High Court has held.
A single judge bench of Justice Ananya Bandopadhyay made this ruling while hearing a case in which Robi Roy was declared as guilty by a lower court in Dinajpur district in 2008.
On May 7, 2007, Roy was acccused of alluring a minor girl in his locality to a secluded place after promising her an ice cream. There he first asked her to remove her innerwear. When the victim refused, he forcefully removed her innerwear.
The victim started shouting which caught the attention of the people residing nearby, who rushed to spot, assaulted Robi Roy and handed him over to the local police. In November 2008, a trial court, finding him guilty, sentenced him to imprisonment for five and a half years and also slapped a Rs 3,000 fine on him.
After being freed from jail, he challenged the order of the lower district court at the Calcutta High Court claiming that he was falsely implicated which caused loss of his social prestige. He claimed that his intention was to express his fatherly affection towards the victim.
Justice Bandopadhyay, however, upheld the order of the lower court and observed that the intention of alluring the victim with ice-cream had mal-intention.
“The victim was allured with ice-cream by the convict just to satisfy his sexual desires. When the victim refused to open her innerwear as asked by the convict, he forcefully removed that. This cannot be treated as an expression of affection. This is equivalent to rape or attempt to rape,” Justice Bandopadhyay observed.
Although medical examination proved that that the minor girl was not a victim of rape, the judge observed that the entire incident is similar to rape of sexual offense under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code.

[ad_2]
#Forceful #removal #innerwear #minor #girls #equivalent #rape #Calcutta
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

February 7, 2023
Plea In SC Against Removal Of Encroachments On Roshni Land In JK Withdrawn

[ad_1]
SRINAGAR: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea against a Jammu and Kashmir government circular directing all Deputy Commissioners to remove encroachments on Union Territory land, including Roshni land and Kachharie land, by January 31, reported BarAndBench.
A bench of Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna was unconvinced with the argument of the petitioners that despite the Jammu & Kashmir State Land (Vesting of Ownership to Occupants) Act, 2001 (popularly known as the Roshni Act) being repealed, their ownership rights persisted.
“You tell us what right you have.. not under Roshni Act – it has been struck down! …. The Act has been repealed. Once the Act has been repealed, where is the question of savings clause?,” the Court remarked.
The bench also orally observed that if the Court were to grant relief to those continuing to occupy the land, it could have larger repercussions.
“If we protect your possession, it will affect the entire J&K encroachment! At the most we can grant you reasonable time to relocate,” the Court said.
The petitioner eventually sought to withdraw the petition and was allowed to do so by the Court.
During the previous hearing, the bench had advised the petitioners to restrict their prayers to status quo rather than a blanket stay on the circular.
“If stay (of order) granted then it will benefit land grabbers also,” Justice Shah had remarked.

In 2001, the Jammu & Kashmir government had enacted a law called the the Roshni Act for granting ownership of state land to unauthorised occupants in order to raise funds for power projects in the erstwhile State.
In October 2020, a Division Bench of Justices Gita Mittal and Rajesh Bindal of the High Court had declared the Act unconstitutional. All acts done under it as well as amendments under the Act were subsequently declared void ab initio.
The Court had also ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the Roshni land scam case, stated to be the biggest ever in the history of the ertswhile State.
The Jammu & Kashmir government had then moved the High Court to review the said ruling. At the same time, appeals were also filed against the High Court judgment before the Supreme Court.
Even as several review petitions challenging the High Court judgment were pending, the Union Territory, on January 9 this year, had directed all deputy commissioners to remove encroachment on such land by January 31, 2023.
Residents were told to either demolish the structures on their own or bear the expenses for the demolition.
The Supreme Court had, earlier this week, agreed to list the urgent application seeking a stay on the circular. Justice Sanjiv Khanna had earlier recused from hearing the matter.

[ad_2]
#Plea #Removal #Encroachments #Roshni #Land #Withdrawn
( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

January 31, 2023
Guj: VHP withdraws protest against ‘Pathaan’ after removal of ‘objectionable’ content

[ad_1]
Ahmedabad: The Gujarat unit of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) on Tuesday withdrew its protest against Shah Rukh Khan-starrer “Pathaan”, a day before its release, expressing satisfaction over the removal of “objectionable” contents from the film.
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has revised the “obscene song” and “lewd words” in the film and hence the right-wing groups will no longer protest against its release, the Gujarat VHP’s secretary Ashok Raval said in a statement.
“Pathaan” has been facing backlash for featuring actor Deepika Padukone in a saffron bikini in the song Besharam Rang’. Several leaders, including from the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, had sought a ban on the film, which is scheduled to release on Wednesday.
Talking to PTI, Raval claimed that in its recent circular, the censor board has made 40 to 45 corrections regarding songs, colour and clothes, which resolve the issues and hence, they no longer need to protest.
This was a victory of the Hindu community, he claimed.
The VHP leader in a statement said, “Following the Bajrang Dal’s protests against ‘Pathaan’, the Censor Board has revised the obscene song and unsavoury words in the film, which is good news. I congratulate all the activists and the entire Hindu community who fought this successful struggle for the protection of religion and culture.”
It is now up to the enlightened citizens to decide whether to watch the film, he said.
The right-wing groups had earlier threatened to stop the release of the film in Gujarat, while the state government had assured police protection to theatres following a representation made by multiplex owners.

Representatives of the Multiplex Association of Gujarat had last week met Minister of State for Home Harsh Sanghavi in Gandhinagar concerned about the threat they had received from various groups.
Sanghavi had assured them support and promised to deploy policemen outside movie theatres for smooth screening of the film.
Earlier on Sunday, five activists of the VHP were arrested in Surat for rioting after they barged into a movie theatre and tore down posters of the movie. Similar protests were reported earlier.
The advance bookings for “Pathaan”, backed by Yash Raj Films, opened from January 20. The film is reportedly set to be released across India on 5,000 screens. It is the first Shah Rukh Khan film to have 6 am shows.
[ad_2]
#Guj #VHP #withdraws #protest #Pathaan #removal #objectionable #content
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

January 24, 2023
SC Asks J&K To Not Demolish Houses In Roshni Land; Refuses To Stay Govt Order For Removal Of Encroachments

[ad_1]
SRINAGAR: On Friday, the Supreme Court of India refused to stay a circular issued by Jammu & Kashmir government directing deputy commissioners to remove encroachments on State Land including Roshni Land and Kachharie land by January 31, 2023, reported LiveLaw.in.
A bench of Justices MR Shah and CT Ravikumar, though expressed its disclination in not passing an order today, it orally asked the Union Territory to not demolish any houses.
“We are not passing any order today. You instruct them orally not to demolish any houses. But we will not grant a general stay…. others should not get benefit,” the bench orally told the counsel of J&K, according to report published in Livelaw.in.
During the hearing, the advocate for the petitioner argued that many tribals are residing on the land and took the Court through the reliefs prayed for.
“If stay is granted then it will benefit land grabbers also?”, Justice Shah asked.
The counsel appearing for the Union Territory clarified that the circular is mainly focused on the Roshni land. He also questioned the locus of the applicants.
“The Application was served on me yesterday. It does not even mention that the applicants live there”, he pointed out while adding that the said land only had shops and such establishments.
The Court then adjourned the matter. The matter was mentioned before the Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, earlier this week.

The Jammu and Kashmir government, on January 9, directed the removal of all encroachments on State Land, including Roshni Land and Kachharie land, by January 31, 2023. The order was passed while several review petitions challenging Roshni Act Judgment remain pending before the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.
In 2020, the Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that the Jammu and Kashmir State Land (Vesting of Ownership to the Occupants) Act 2001, [popularly known as Roshni Act] is completely unconstitutional.

[ad_2]
#Asks #Demolish #Houses #Roshni #Land #Refuses #Stay #Govt #Order #Removal #Encroachments
( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

January 20, 2023