Tag: Refuses

Mahesh Babu refuses to shoot in Hyderabad? Know why

[ad_1]
Hyderabad: The scorching temperatures of Hyderabad during the summer months have always been a cause of concern for Tollywood celebrities. Summer can be brutal in Hyderabad, as Tollywood’s leading actor Mahesh Babu knows all too well. In previous years, he avoided filming during the hottest months in order to spend time with his family.
This year, however, he has begun his summer vacation even earlier by spending 12 days in the lovely city of Paris. According to reports, the superstar is still not ready to begin filming for his upcoming film, “SSMB 28,” even after returning to Hyderabad.
Wondering why? Well, Mahesh Babu reportedly avoids working in the intense heat of the summer months.

It is being sair that Mahesh Babu is planning another vacation and will wait for the temperatures to drop before returning to work.
Fans of the actor may have to wait a little longer for him to return to the big screen, as production on “SSMB 28” is currently on hold.
Nonetheless, it’s admirable that Mahesh Babu prioritizes his health and well-being despite his hectic schedule. After all, a rested and rejuvenated superstar is bound to bring his A-game when he returns back to the sets.
Subscribe us on

[ad_2]
#Mahesh #Babu #refuses #shoot #Hyderabad
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

April 27, 2023
Anti-CAA stir: SC refuses to discharge Assam MLA Akhil Gogoi in NIA case

[ad_1]
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld an order of the Gauhati High Court which had set aside the discharge of independent Assam MLA Akhil Gogoi in connection with a case related to anti-CAA protests and suspected Maoist links.
Allowing an appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), the high court had remanded the matter back to the trial court to conduct a fresh hearing on the question of framing of charge against all the four accused persons including Gogoi.
A top court bench of justices V Ramasubramanian and Pankaj Mithal confirmed the high court order in “all respects”.

The top court, however, granted bail to Gogoi pending trial while noting that he has suffered incarceration for about 567 days.
“He has been out as a free man for the past more than 21 months. It is important to note that his freedom was secured not by an order of bail, but by an order of discharge passed by the special court, which has now been reversed by the high court.
“Nothing has been brought on record to show that during this period of 21 months, when the petitioner has been a free man, he has indulged in any unlawful activity,” it said.
On the contrary, the petitioner got elected to the legislative assembly in 2021 and he is now a sitting member of the assembly, the apex court said.
It said except in cases of preventive detention, the purpose of detaining a person in police/judicial custody, is either to facilitate fair and proper investigation or as a measure of penalty after conviction.

“In this case, (i) the investigation is over and (ii) the petitioner is not yet a convicted criminal. Therefore, we do not think that any purpose will be served in allowing the Special Court to remand him to custody and then enabling him to move an application for bail.
“In fact, the offences under the Indian Penal Code alleged against the petitioner are punishable only with imprisonment for a period of up to 3 years. It is only the offences alleged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, which are punishable with larger terms of imprisonment,” it said.
The bench said if the offences under the IPC alone are taken into account, the petitioner has served, as an undertrial prisoner, more than half of the maximum period prescribed under the relevant provisions.
“Therefore, this is not a case where the petitioner should be allowed to be detained in custody, especially after having secured an order of discharge, rightly or wrongly,” it said.
The lawmaker, who has allegedly been vocal against the central government during the anti-CAA protests, had moved the top court against the February 9 order of the high court allowing the special NIA court in Assam to proceed with the framing of charges against him in one of the two cases.
Earlier, the high court had permitted the NIA to seek framing of charges in the special court against Gogoi and three of his associates in connection with anti-CAA protests and suspected Maoist links.
The high court’s order had come on an appeal of the NIA challenging the order of a special NIA court giving clean chit to the four.
The high court had asked the agency to go ahead with framing charges after reopening the case.
The MLA has come to the apex court against the order.
The other three accused were Dhaijya Konwar, Bittu Sonowal and Manash Konwar, all of whom got bail in the NIA case and were released from jail.
Gogoi was the only one whose bail was rejected by the court and he was released after spending 567 days in jail once Special NIA Judge Pranjal Das cleared him along with the three others of all charges.
The NIA is investigating two cases against Gogoi related to anti-CAA protests. In one of those, the special NIA court had granted him bail, which was upheld by the Gauhati High Court too in April 2021 after the probe agency challenged it.
The RTI activist continued to be in judicial custody as he was rejected bail in the second case related to anti-CAA violence and was being investigated by the NIA.
Later, the special NIA court on July 1, 2021 released Gogoi and his three associates for their alleged role in the violent anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act stir in the state in December 2019 and observed there was nothing to indicate that the “talk of blockade” threatened the country’s economic security or was “a terrorist act”.
The NIA then moved the Gauhati High Court appealing it to allow the agency to frame charges under various sections, including sedition, of the IPC and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.
[ad_2]
#AntiCAA #stir #refuses #discharge #Assam #MLA #Akhil #Gogoi #NIA #case
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

April 18, 2023
John Abraham refuses to work with Sajid Khan, rejects offer

[ad_1]
Mumbai: Actor John Abraham was lauded for his performance in the mega blockbuster Hindi film Pathaan. The actor is now planning to give more hits to maintain the huge fandom and in a shock he has reportedly walked out of Sajid Khan’s comeback directorial, 100%.
Rumours suggest that John Abraham opted to move out of Sajid’s project because he wanted to focus on action packed roles only now. John’s role as Jim in Pathaan was widely appreciated and it seems that the actor wants to focus on action-packed roles only now. The project titled ‘100%’ is a comedy film.
Multiple reports also claim that the actor has left the Awara Pagal Deewana 2 too. Yes, it is said that Jim from Pathaan has walked out of the film which also stars Akshay Kumar and Vidyut Jamwal.

Sajid Khan’s 100% will star Riteish Deshmukh, Nora Fatehi and Shehnaaz Gill in lead roles. Reports suggest that makers of the 100 % are looking for another big name after John left the project.
On his front, Abraham will be seen in action entertainer Tehran. The winner of the Miss World 2017 pageant Manushi Chhillar will star as the female lead in Tehran.
Subscribe us on
[ad_2]
#John #Abraham #refuses #work #Sajid #Khan #rejects #offer

( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

April 17, 2023
Remarks on Art 370 abrogation: Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against Kashmiri prof

[ad_1]
The Bombay High Court refused a petition which sought to quash an FIR report registered against a young Kashmiri professor for his WhatsApp status that read, “August 5 Black Day for Jammu and Kashmir” in reference to the abrogation of Article 370.
Javed Ahmed Hajam, the professor of Kolhapur College, who originally hails from Baramulla in Kashmir had allegedly, in 2022, put two WhatsApp statuses in a group of parents and teachers. In one he termed August 5, 2019, a black day. On the 2nd, he greeted Pakistan for its independence on August 14.
On Friday, the bench of Justice Sunil Shukre and MM Sathaye beheld that in a democratic country like India, there is a fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19. But they said that any critical words or dissenting opinions must be expressed properly after analysing the whole situation in a sensitive matter.

“The first message which has been posted on the WhatsApp application by the petitioner is, without giving any reason and without making any critical analysis of the step taken by the Central Government towards abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution. In our view, this message has the tendency to play with the emotions of different groups of people in India as there are strong feelings of contrasting nature about the status of Jammu and Kashmir in India and, therefore, one has to tread cautiously in such a field, lest the emotions may reach up to such a level as to bring about consequences or a reasonable possibility of consequences visiting as envisaged in Section 153-A of Indian penal code (IPC),” the order stated.
Bench concluded by saying that the case was a matter of trial to investigate whether an accused is really implicated in the offence under section 153A of IPC
The court refused to quash the FIR, stating, “As of now, prima-facie it does appear to be having much impact on the mind of different groups of people, for the reasons stated just now, and therefore prima-facie constitutes the offence under Section 153-A of IPC.”
It pertains to say, Articles 370 and 35(A) which gave special status to the erstwhile Jammu and Kashmir state in terms of autonomy and its ability to formulate laws for the state’s permanent residents was nullified under the BJP-led government on August 5, 2019.

[ad_2]
#Remarks #Art #abrogation #Bombay #refuses #quash #FIR #Kashmiri #prof
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

April 15, 2023
IMF stands its ground, refuses to show any flexibility towards Pakistan

[ad_1]
Islamabad: The International Monetary Fund (IMF), Pakistan’s only hope for a bailout from its crippling economic conditions and looming threats of a meltdown, does not seem to be ready to show any restraint in its demands and expectations from the current Shehbaz Sharif government, as it snubbed Islamabad’s recent request to show flexibility and go ahead with the signing of the staff-level agreement.
In the most recent development, Pakistan’s Finance Minister Ishaq Dar had a virtual meeting with the IMF’s Director for the Middle East and Central Asia Jihad Azour, where he requested the IMF Director to show flexibility and consideration towards Pakistan and sign the staff-level agreement.
However, Dar’s desire could not be fulfilled as he failed to convince the IMF Director to give him a date of the agreement, despite the existing dangerous and constantly worsening economic crisis in the country.

As per details, the IMF Director re-emphasised the issue of petrol subsidy and possible fiscal shortcomings that may trigger because of the implementation of the subsidy plan.
“The minister (Dar) urged the IMF not to raise the issue of petrol subsidy, and objected to the IMF’s approach of seeking clarification about the schemes announced by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif,” a government source said.
“The Finance Minister also requested the IMF to lower the needed foreign loan requirements by another $1 billion to $5 billion after improvement of the current account deficit,” the source added reminding that the IMF has already cut the requirement by $1 billion to $6 billion last month.
Dar highlighted the steps undertaken by the current government to satisfy and implement the pre-conditions of the IMF, insisting that the delay in the approval of the 9th review of the IMF Extended Funding Facility (EFF) programme to Pakistan, other connected funding from global lenders like the World Bank and other multilateral institutions, have also been withheld, causing major damages to the country’s economic condition.
“The minister informed that all prior actions for 9th review under the Extended Fund Facility have already been completed and government of Pakistan is fully committed to fulfill its obligations as agreed with the IMF,” stated a press release of the Finance Ministry.

But to put Dar’s case to rest, the IMF maintained that all the issues remained unsettled until the deal was ratified by its executive board, irrespective of the fact whether a country met the prior actions before the staff-level agreement or after that.
The IMF hoped that the staff-level agreement would be signed soon, highlighting the need for Pakistan to ensure visible progress on the reforms in the various sectors and complete the IMF programme in time.
[ad_2]
#IMF #stands #ground #refuses #show #flexibility #Pakistan
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

April 14, 2023
Priyanka Chahar Choudhary refuses to work with Rohit Shetty?

[ad_1]
Mumbai: Priyanka Chahar Choudhary, who is known for her stint in Bigg Boss 16, is currently one of the most loved female stars in television industry. She earned massive love and fan following across the country during her game in BB 16. She was last seen in a music video with Ankit Gupta and fans are now curious to know about her upcoming projects.
Priyanka Chahar Choudhary rejects Khatron Ke Khiladi 13?
After Bigg Boss 16, fans were eagerly anticipating her participation in the another top reality show Khatron Ke Khiladi 13, hosted by Rohit Shetty. She was offered the same, but latest buzz suggests that she has backed out of the show. Her sudden exit has left many wondering about the reasons behind her decision.
The news of Priyanka Chahar Choudhary turning down Khatron Ke Khiladi 13 offer came as a shock to fans who were looking forward to seeing her brave challenges and daring stunts on the show. As per reports, the actress was all set to join the star-studded lineup of contestants, including popular names from the entertainment industry. However, she has now withdrawn from the show, leaving fans wondering about the reasons behind her decision.

However, no official statement has been made by the actress or the show’s team regarding the same.
Do you want to see Priyanka Chahar Choudhary in Khatron Ke Khiladi 13? Comment your thoughts below. Stay tuned to Siasat.com for more interesting scoops and updates.
Subscribe us on
[ad_2]
#Priyanka #Chahar #Choudhary #refuses #work #Rohit #Shetty

( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

April 10, 2023
Nitish refuses to join issue with Pawar on Adani

[ad_1]
Patna: Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar on Saturday refused to join the issue with NCP president Sharad Pawar, who has caused a flutter with a contrarian stance on the opposition’s demand for a JPC probe into allegations against the Adani Group.
The JD(U) supreme leader, whose party, in Parliament, has been supporting the demand for a joint parliamentary committee probe, however, did not seem impressed with the Maratha strongman’s preference for an investigation by a “Supreme Court-appointed Committee”.
“I learnt about it from the media”, quipped the Bihar CM when he was asked about the stance adopted by Pawar, whom he had met last year as part of efforts to galvanize parties opposed to the BJP.

“It is for him (Pawar) to elaborate on what he has said. Different people have different opinions”, added Kumar, who had by his side JD(U) national president Rajiv Ranjan Singh alias Lalan, the Munger MP who was among those in news for outbursts on the Adani issue during the recently held Parliament session.
In an interview with NDTV, Pawar came out in support of the Adani Group and criticised the narrative around the US-based Hindenburg Research’s report on the conglomerate.
Pawar said he favoured a Supreme Court committee to probe allegations against the Adani Group, since the ruling party would have a majority in the JPC based on numerical strength in Parliament and this would lead to doubts on such an investigation.
The Adani Group has denied the fraud and manipulation charges made by Hindenburg Research against its companies that triggered an unprecedented stock crash.
Kumar, who was attending an ‘Iftar’ hosted here by his party, was also asked about the recent communal riots in Sasaram and Bihar Sharif towns.

“The administrative machinery is at work in both places. Those who have suffered losses of any type will be provided help and relief,” Kumar said.
[ad_2]
#Nitish #refuses #join #issue #Pawar #Adani
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

April 8, 2023
‘Misuse of central agencies’: SC refuses to entertain plea of 14 parties

[ad_1]
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to entertain a plea by 14 parties, led by the Congress, alleging arbitrary use of central probe agencies against opposition leaders and seeking guidelines for the future.
A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice J B Pardiwala said that “laying down general guidelines without having relation to facts of a case will be dangerous”.
Sensing the disinclination on the part of the top court in entertaining the plea, senior advocate A M Sighvi, appearing for the political parties, sought permission to withdraw the petition.

“Learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the plea at this stage. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn,” the bench ordered.
“You please come back to us when you have an individual criminal case or group of cases,” the bench said.
The plea alleged an alarming rise in the use of coercive criminal processes against opposition political leaders and other citizens exercising their fundamental right to dissent.
Besides the Congress, the parties that are part of the joint move are the DMK, RJD, BRS, Trinamool Congress, AAP, NCP, Shiv Sena (UBT), JMM, JD(U), CPI(M), CPI, Samajwadi Party and the J-K National Conference.

[ad_2]
#Misuse #central #agencies #refuses #entertain #plea #parties
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

April 5, 2023
Saif Ali Khan refuses to work with Jr NTR, here’s why

[ad_1]
Mumbai: Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan has always been known to pick unconventional roles and is known for his versatility as an actor. He has reportedly turned down an offer to star in the upcoming big-budget Telugu film NTR 30, which features Jr NTR and Janhvi Kapoor in the lead roles. He was approached to play antagonist in the movie.
While the exact reason behind Saif rejected this offer is unknown, it is possible that he might have felt that the role offered to him did not align with his vision. Alternatively, it could be a simple case of scheduling conflicts, with the actor having prior commitments that prevent him from taking up the project.
Whatever the reason may be, it is clear that Saif Ali Khan’s presence in NTR 30 would have added to the star power of the already much-anticipated film.

Speaking more NTR 30, the movie is being directed by Koratala Siva and is set to go on floors soon. It marks Janhvi Kapoor’s debut in Tollywood.
Saif Ali Khan, on the other hand, has pan-India movie Adipurush which stars Kriti Sanon and Prabhas in the lead roles.
Subscribe us on

[ad_2]
#Saif #Ali #Khan #refuses #work #NTR #heres

( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

April 4, 2023
SC refuses to stay conviction of Abdullah Azam Khan in criminal case, seeks UP’s reply

[ad_1]
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to stay the conviction and sentence of senior Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Azam Khan’s son Abdullah Azam Khan in a 15-year-old case without hearing the state.
A bench of justices KM Joseph and BV Nagarathna asked senior advocate Vivek Tankha and advocate Sumeer Sodhi to serve the copy of the petition to the standing counsel of Uttar Pradesh government and posted the matter for further hearing on April 5.
Tankha said Khan was a juvenile at the time of offence and hence his conviction and sentence be stayed.
“Sorry, for that we will have to hear the state also,” the bench said.
During the hearing, Tankha said Khan was juvenile at the time of incident and the high court has erred in not staying the session court’s order.
In his plea filed through Sodhi, Khan said he has challenged the order of Allahabad High Court dated March 17 by which it had asked the state to respond to the appeal in three weeks.
“The high court failed to appreciate the fact that if the application is not decided expeditiously then the same would be rendered infructuous and the petitioner would suffer irreparable harm which no court of competent jurisdiction would be able to undo even if the application is decided in favour of the petitioner,” it said.
Giving the detail of the case, he said the trial court had on February 13, convicted him for offences punishable under section 353 and 341 of IPC and other offences and sentenced him to undergo two years of simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs 2,000.

He said subsequent to the order of the trial court, the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly secretariat on February 15, notified that Suar constituency of Rampur district of Uttar Pradesh has become vacant with effect from February 13.
Khan said he appealed the verdict of the trial court before additional sessions judge Rampur and also filed an application for stay of conviction and sentence but the court on February 28 dismissed the plea and application.
He said that on the same day he approached the high court against the order of the sessions court but the high court on March 17, granted a time period of three weeks to the state government to respond to his plea.
“In a nutshell, the case of the SLP petitioner before this court is that the impugned order passed by the high court is bad in law as the said order is passed without taking into account the urgent requirement of the issues involved in the application preferred by the petitioner,” the plea said.
Khan said that non-adjudication of his application in a time bound manner would render the same infructuous and therefore it is imperative that the high court considers the application as soon as possible, given the potential consequences of the conviction and sentence, which may include re-election on his assembly seat in the assembly.
“The petitioner believes that during the pendency of the application before the high court, by-election to the Rampur constituency would be announced. The petitioner is concerned that if such an announcement is made and thereafter, the high court passes a stay order the same would be rendered moot due to the announcement of the by-elections,” his plea said.
Khan said his conviction is legally unsustainable as he was a minor when the offence was committed.
“There are judicial orders to the effect that the date of birth of the petitioner is January 1, 1993, hence the petitioner was merely 15 years old at the time of commission of the offence in question. Accordingly, the entire trial proceedings are flawed,” he said.
The FIR against Khan, Azam and seven others was lodged in 2008.
Khan had sat on dharna on a state highway on January 29, 2008 as their cavalcade was stopped by police for checking in the wake of an attack on a Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) camp in Rampur in Uttar Pradesh on December 31, 2007.
The FIR was lodged at the Chhajlait police station.
While Khan and Azam were sentenced to two years in jail under section 353 (criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) and other provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the seven other accused were exonerated.
[ad_2]
#refuses #stay #conviction #Abdullah #Azam #Khan #criminal #case #seeks #UPs #reply
( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

March 29, 2023