Tag: questions

  • Ron DeSantis in Guantánamo: how questions about his past haunt the Florida governor

    Ron DeSantis in Guantánamo: how questions about his past haunt the Florida governor

    [ad_1]

    In the middle of a June night 17 years ago in the Guantánamo prison camp, guards and medical orderlies were urgently summoned to one of the inmate clinics, where an emergency was unfolding.

    Two inmates, Ali Abdullah Ahmed and Mani Shaman al-Utaybi, had been brought in dead. A third, Yasser Talal al-Zahrani, had been rushed to the hospital on the US naval base but was declared dead there soon afterwards. The three men were found hanging from their necks, with their hands and feet bound and rags in their throats.

    It was the worst loss of life in the prison camp’s history – in the midst of a turbulent year in which there were hunger strikes and riots as well as the three deaths – and officers around the base were roused from their sleep and rushed to Camp Delta, the main internment centre.

    R Adm Harry Harris arrived, the base commander who would go on to command the Pacific fleet, accompanied by Col Michael Bumgarner, the head of the overall prison complex. At some point, witnesses say, a more junior officer turned up, a 27-year-old navy lawyer, or judge advocate general (JAG), Lt Ron DeSantis.

    Ron DeSantis’s first official photo as a Navy ensign
    The first official photo of Ron DeSantis as a US Navy ensign. He joined the Navy in 2004. Photograph: US Navy

    The future Florida governor and Republican presidential contender had been assigned to Guantánamo three months earlier, part of a small legal team tasked with ensuring the guards and other military personnel followed the law. He was the most junior JAG in the camp, but after the three deaths on the night of 9 June 2006, his superior officer, Capt Patrick McCarthy, ordered him to start collecting initial evidence.

    It is unclear when exactly DeSantis became involved in the investigation. Some of the witness statements mention an unnamed JAG at the scene in the early hours of 10 June. McCarthy did not respond to a request for comment but confirmed to the Washington Post he had ordered DeSantis to gather information.

    “I cannot tell you specifically what [DeSantis] did,” McCarthy told the Post, but said his subordinate was probably “involved in facilitating access to information, trying to make sure that privileged information did not get swept up. He would have been one of the folks that I dispatched to help facilitate the investigative effort.”

    Ron DeSantis in London on Friday.
    Ron DeSantis in London on Friday. Photograph: Alberto Pezzali/AP

    Ahmed Abdel Aziz, a Mauritanian inmate at Camp Delta, said he had recognised DeSantis much later when he became famous as Florida governor.

    “DeSantis and his group, the JAGs people were there. They were conducting the investigation,” Aziz said. “They were coming the same day the people died. They came to the cells.”

    What DeSantis saw and heard in the hours and days after the three deaths could be key to an enduring mystery that has hung over Guantánamo ever since: how did Ahmed, Utaybi and Zahrani die?

    Before the investigation even began, Harris, who would also later serve as US ambassador to Seoul, declared the three prisoners had killed themselves, describing it as “an act of asymmetrical warfare waged against us”. An official inquiry by the Navy Criminal Investigation Service (NCIS), who DeSantis had been detailed to support, concurred with Harris’s verdict within 11 days, though its findings were only made public two years later, in a report that was rife with contradictions and literal holes, with multiple pages missing.

    Anyone who was on the scene would have known there were serious questions about the official account. According to that narrative, the dead men bound their hands and feet, stuck cloth deep down their own throats, fashioned nooses from strips of material, climbed on their washbasins with the noose around their neck and stepped off.

    They had only been in the same prison block, Alpha, for 72 hours, in separate cells with empty cells in between. Alpha block was for high-security prisoners who were forbidden to mingle or even talk to each other. Yet the three men were alleged to have conspired to kill themselves in exactly the same manner at exactly the same time.

    By the time they were brought to the clinic, Ahmed and Utaybi’s bodies already had advanced rigor mortis, setting the time of death to before 10.30pm. That meant that, according to the official version, they would have been hanging for more than two hours in cells with transparent wire mesh sides, in a block holding about 15 prisoners that was meant to be continually patrolled along a central walkway by a team of six guards.

    US Army military police escort a detainee to his cell in Camp X-Ray at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, in 2002
    US Army military police escort a detainee to his cell in Camp X-Ray at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, in 2002. Photograph: Reuters

    Mark Denbeaux, a professor at Seton Hall law school, who led to forensic analyses of the three deaths, said it was hard to imagine that anyone with DeSantis’s legal training would fail to spot the inconsistencies in the official version.

    “Any JAG would want to know how guys would die while they’re in a cell guarded by five guys, and how they could have been hanging long enough for rigor mortis and with a rag shoved down their throats,” Denbeaux said.

    The NCIS report said that the three men had blocked the view into their cells with blankets and mattresses and stuffed other fabric into their beds to make it look as if they were asleep. It was never explained where they would have all acquired so much material, which was severely restricted. A routine search of all the Alpha block cells by a guard shift a few hours earlier found no evidence of any such banned material. The official report said “apparent suicide notes” were found, but the documents were never submitted for fingerprint or handwriting analysis.

    The NCIS investigators did not formally interview the senior medical officer on duty that night, nor did they talk to the soldiers from a military intelligence unit in the guard towers with a clear sight of the camp, and whose version of events was quite different from the NCIS account.

    According to Joseph Hickman, who was sergeant of the guard that night, no one was taken from Alpha block to the medical clinic. However, hours earlier in the evening, a white prison van came three times, and each time navy guards took away a prisoner and drove towards a secret site that appeared on no maps, hidden from view and surrounded by razor wire. Hickman and his fellow soldiers referred to it as Camp No as in “No such camp”. It was revealed much later to be a CIA black site, where inmates were subjected to “enhanced interrogation”.

    Hickman and his unit were under standing orders not to interfere with the van or to record its movements. The vehicle returned at 11.30pm but Hickman did not see who was in it, because it backed up to the medical clinic where it was unloaded. The soldiers saw no other activity until about 12.15am, when the camp lights were suddenly turned on and the alarm was sounded.

    US military guards moving a detainee inside Camp Delta in Guantánamo Bay
    US military guards moving a detainee inside Camp Delta in Guantánamo Bay. Photograph: Paul J Richards/AFP/Getty Images

    In 2009, two years after he left the army, Hickman approached Denbeaux and together they approached the justice department, then under Barack Obama’s administration, and presented testimony of what he and eight other soldiers saw that night. Officials assured them the deaths would be investigated, but nearly a year of silence went by before Denbeaux got a call saying, without explanation, the investigation had been dropped.

    “It was disappointing because the justice department just dropped it. The FBI didn’t want to report it because it was dealing with a CIA black site,” Hickman said. “I had waited for Bush to leave office and Obama to come in and I was so optimistic. They just let me down big time.”

    Frustrated, they went to the press. Hickman and three of his soldiers gave their accounts to Scott Horton, a human rights lawyer, who wrote an article for Harpers magazine in March 2010, casting doubt on whether the deaths were suicides. Hickman wrote a book in 2015 called Murder at Camp Delta.

    He said he remembered DeSantis from his time at Camp Delta. “He was there quite a bit. I would see him jogging around. He was very athletic and very handsome and all the navy girls loved him.”

    At the time DeSantis was assigned to Guantánamo, there were four or five staff judge advocates always present at the camp working on rotation, from a small, secure top floor office, with sweeping views of the bay. It was a time of frantic activity at the prison, amid mounting legal challenges filed on behalf of detainees and widespread hunger strikes the year before.

    According to one former Naval JAG, who served at Guantánamo at the same time as DeSantis but did not work directly with him, “It was a period of time where they were putting the best attorneys they could find into this office.”

    “We needed top quality people down there,” the former JAG recalled, adding that DeSantis was described to him by his superiors as a “sharp, good guy”.

    Nonetheless, the source confirmed: “He [DeSantis] was way down the food chain. He ain’t making policy, he’s making paper. And he was also a short timer. It was obvious from his trajectory that he had no career aspirations [in the JAG corps].”

    A part of the Harpers investigation centered on the experience of a fourth detainee, the British resident Shaker Aamer, who knew the three men well. He claimed he was beaten for over two hours by several naval military police on the same night the three men died, alleging in a later legal complaint he was choked and his eyes gouged during the assault after failing to provide a retina scan and fingerprints to authorities.

    “I remember having a conversation with Shaker at the time about his trauma,” recalled Aamer’s attorney, Clive Stafford Smith, who was present at Guantánamo in the immediate aftermath of the deaths. “I remember it because he thought he was next.”

    “He was always vague about whether it was murder, or them being pressed into taking their own lives. From his view it was all the same. They were being treated so horribly.”

    Aziz, the Mauritanian inmate who was returned home in 2015 after 13 years without charge, said he had become familiar with DeSantis’s face in the preceding few months, as a low-level JAG to whom detainees could bring their complaints.

    “We said, hey man. We are suffering here. People are in a bad way and need medical help,” Aziz recalled. “He was always smiling, saying OK, this is why we are here to make sure things are right. We will look into it.”

    However, after the 9 June deaths, DeSantis’s demeanour towards the inmates changed markedly, Aziz said. “When things became so bad, after the death of the three detainees, he became silent and not a sympathetic face any more.

    The three dead detainees were not seen as high value prisoners and had been handed over to the US by other forces who claimed they were al-Qaida. None was ever charged. Zahrani was just 17 when he was captured and 22 when he died. He and 30-year-old Utaybi were Saudis. Ahmed, aged 37, was Yemeni. What they had in common was their involvement in a mass hunger strike, which was why they had been put in Alpha block.

    They were among the last holdouts of the protest against detention without trial and the poor conditions that had begun the previous year. It was largely quashed through force feeding where inmates were strapped to a chair and a nutritional drink, Ensure, was pumped through tubes inserted in their noses.

    “One by one they strapped us into the chair which has eight restraint points,” said Mansoor Adayfi, a Yemeni who was also a teenager when he was captured and later wrote an account of his time in the camp, Don’t Forget Us Here: Lost and Found at Guantánamo.

    “You can breathe but you can’t move. They brought piles of Ensure and started pouring them into our stomachs, one can after another. And I was screaming, shouting, yelling, crying, and I was shitting myself.”

    Adayfi claims DeSantis was among a group of officers observing.

    “There was a colonel and DeSantis. They were looking at each other and were just smiling,” Aziz claims. At one point, he said DeSantis bent over him to encourage him to stop his strike and to start eating, at which point, Aziz threw up over him.

    “That’s BS,” DeSantis said on Thursday, when asked about the allegations. “Do you honestly believe that’s credible? So this is 2006. I’m a junior officer. Do you honestly think that they would have remembered me from Adam? Of course not. They’re just trying to get into the news because they know people like you will consume it because it fits your pre-ordained narrative.”

    There is barely mention of Guantánamo in DeSantis’s recently released memoir, The Courage to Be Free, but during his 2018 gubernatorial campaign the then candidate was pressed by CBS Miami for an account of his time there.

    Stating his job had been to offer legal advice he told the station: “Everything at that time was legal in nature, one way or another. So the commander wants to know, how do I combat this? So one of the jobs of a legal adviser would be like: ‘Hey, you actually can force feed, here’s what you can do.’”

    He said one the lessons he learned from Guantánamo had been: “They [detainees] are using things like detainee abuse offensively against us. It was a tactic, technique, and procedure.”

    More recently, he has distanced himself from the use of force feeding, downplaying his role.

    “I was a junior officer. I didn’t have authority to authorise anything,” he told the British journalist Piers Morgan last month. “There may have been a commander that would have done feeding if someone was going to die, but that was not something that I would have even had authority to do.”

    Asked for comment on force feeding and the investigation into the three deaths, a spokesman for the DeSantis’s office said: “The governor’s comments stand on their own.”

    Aziz said of DeSantis: “He was the wrong person, at the wrong place at the wrong time.” He was just a lieutenant, carrying out instructions and mostly performing routine tasks rather than making decisions, but Aziz argued that his legal training, at Harvard and then at the US Navy JAG school, gave him a particular duty to speak out.

    “If you are just a soldier you have less responsibility for what you are doing, but if you are in charge of legal things, then it’s extremely bad,” Aziz said. “He was coming on a regular basis. He was visiting the places where dark things, dirty things were perpetrated. He saw everything, and I guarantee you he never objected.”



    [ad_2]
    #Ron #DeSantis #Guantánamo #questions #haunt #Florida #governor
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Post your questions for Soft Cell

    Post your questions for Soft Cell

    [ad_1]

    With their wayward yet wildly catchy synthpop, Soft Cell crafted one of the most thrilling sounds of the 80s. Hits like Tainted Love and Say Hello, Wave Goodbye have stood the test of time, but the band faded from the spotlight after their initial success. Now, as they prepare to release their fifth studio album, and the first in two decades, Marc Almond and Dave Ball will answer your questions – post them in the comments below.

    After growing up in separate northern seaside towns, the pair first met as students at Leeds Polytechnic in 1977, when Almond asked Ball to soundtrack his provocative performance art. After a string of experimental covers and local shows, the duo put together their debut EP Mutant Moments at the turn of the decade, using a simple two-track recorder. But it was the release of their sleazy revamp of Gloria Jones’s Tainted Love in 1981 that propelled Soft Cell from underground misfits to mainstream success. The track became the biggest single of the year in the UK and its 43 consecutive weeks on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart set a new record.

    The band refused to conform to popular taste, though: their debut album Non-Stop Erotic Cabaret, which became a platinum bestseller, channelled the dark and agitated sounds of Throbbing Gristle and Suicide and explored explicit themes such as pornographic films and BDSM. Meanwhile, their outlandish performances, including a Top of the Pops appearance with Almond’s drug dealer and a banned music video for Sex Dwarf, sparked controversy.

    After splitting in 1984, the duo reformed briefly in 2001 and released their fourth album Cruelty Without Beauty the following year, then disbanded again. Almond and Ball continued to pursue other musical endeavours until a 2018 reunion concert in London billed as their last ever live UK performance. But five years on they’re releasing new album Happiness Not Included, and kick off a UK tour next month.

    Ahead of their return, Soft Cell will answer your questions. Maybe you’re curious about the band’s short but lively stint in the 80s, from their encounters in Leeds during its post-punk heyday to the time they met Andy Warhol in New York? Or maybe you want to know more about the new record: how does it feel to release music after so long, and what was it like making an album remotely during the pandemic?

    skip past newsletter promotion

    Post your questions in the comments below by midday on Monday 1 May. Soft Cell’s answers will be published online and in our Film & Music section on Friday 5 May.

    [ad_2]
    #Post #questions #Soft #Cell
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • CBI asked me about 56 questions; entire excise policy case is false: Arvind Kejriwal

    CBI asked me about 56 questions; entire excise policy case is false: Arvind Kejriwal

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Sunday said the CBI asked him around 56 questions regarding the excise policy case and he answered them all.

    “I want to say that the entire excise policy case is false. They do not have any evidence that the AAP is wrong. It’s a result of dirty politics,” he told reporters.

    He was speaking to the media at his residence after around nine hours of questioning by the probe agency.

    MS Education Academy

    “AAP is a kattar honest party. We did nothing wrong. They asked me 56 questions. The total case is fake. They don’t have anything against us. No evidence. The entire case is bad politics,” Kejriwal said.

    As of now, no date has been given to Kejriwal for the second round of questioning.

    Thanking the CBI officials for their “hospitality”, Kejriwal said, “They asked me questions in a friendly and harmonious manner. I answered all the questions asked by them.”

    “The CBI asked around 56 questions regarding the excise policy, including when and why the policy was started,” he added.

    The AAP chief, who arrived at the heavily fortified agency headquarters at around 11 am in his official black SUV, was taken to the first-floor office of the Anti Corruption Branch where he was quizzed by the investigation team, officials said.

    A team of senior officials recorded his statement. The CBI has filed a charge sheet in the matter and now they are all set to file a supplementary charge sheet.

    Kejriwal was asked about AAP leader Vijay Nair, businessman Sameer Mahendru and how the policy got leaked before it was implemented.

    Delhi’s then Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia was arrested by the CBI and the ED in the case and is presently behind bars.

    The Delhi Police had imposed Section 144 in and around the CBI’s headquarters to avoid any problems and detained 1,305 AAP workers.

    (With inputs from agencies)



    [ad_2]
    #CBIasked #questions #entire #excise #policy #case #false #Arvind #Kejriwal

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • BJP has ‘instructed’ CBI to arrest me, will honestly answer questions posed by agency: Kejriwal

    BJP has ‘instructed’ CBI to arrest me, will honestly answer questions posed by agency: Kejriwal

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Ahead of his appearance before the CBI, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Sunday alleged that the BJP might have ordered the probe agency to arrest him and said they are “very powerful and can send anyone to jail”.

    In a five-minute video message on Twitter, Kejriwal said he would truthfully and honestly answer questions posed by the CBI in the excise case as he has nothing to hide.

    “I have been summoned by CBI today and I will give all the answers with honesty. These people are very powerful. They can send anyone to jail, it does not matter if that person has committed any crime or not,” the AAP leader said.

    MS Education Academy

    “Since yesterday, all of their leaders are screaming at top of their voices that Kejriwal will be arrested and I think BJP has instructed CBI also that Kejriwal should be arrested. If BJP has given an order, then who is CBI? CBI is going to arrest me,” he said.

    He also asserted that he can sacrifice his life for the country

    “I love the country and Bharat Mata, can sacrifice my life for the country,” he added.

    Kejriwal is set to appear before the CBI on Sunday in connection with the excise policy case and will be accompanied to the agency’s office by his Punjab counterpart Bhagwant Mann and cabinet colleagues.

    He is being summoned as a witness and is not an accused in the excise policy case in which his former deputy Manish Sisodia was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on February 26. Sisodia was last month arrested by the ED.

    It is alleged that the Delhi government’s excise policy for 2021-22 to grant licences to liquor traders favoured certain dealers who had allegedly paid bribes for it, a charge strongly refuted by the AAP. The policy was later scrapped.

    Officials said the CBI may also quiz Kejriwal on the statements of other accused where they have indicated the manner in which policy was allegedly influenced to favour some liquor businessmen and the ‘South liquor lobby’.

    In addition, the agency may also seek his role in the formulation of the excise policy and his knowledge about alleged influence being cast by the traders and ‘South lobby’ members, the officials said.

    Kejriwal may also be asked if he was involved in the formulation of the policy before it was given approval, they said.

    [ad_2]
    #BJP #instructed #CBI #arrest #honestly #answer #questions #posed #agency #Kejriwal

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Why is PM Modi silent on Satya Pal Malik’s revelations, questions MVA

    Why is PM Modi silent on Satya Pal Malik’s revelations, questions MVA

    [ad_1]

    Mumbai: The Opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) has demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Bharatiya Janata Party should come clear on the statements made by former Jammu and Kashmir Governor Satya Pal Malik on various issues, including the Pulwama attacks, here on Saturday.

    Terming Malik’s contentions on corruption, farmers and February 2019 Pulwama strikes as ‘grave’ and directly linked with national security, the Congress state president Nana Patole, Nationalist Congress Party Chief Spokesperson Mahesh Tapase and Shiv Sena (UBT) National Spokesperson Kishore Tiwari have said they must be probed thoroughly.

    “Many questions are raised in Malik’s allegations that Prime Minister Narendra Modi asked him to keep silent when the government’s fault was pointed out in the Pulwama attacks that led to the killing of 40 soldiers,” said Patole.

    MS Education Academy

    He said doubts are created in public minds if this is true and why the demand to send airplanes for the jawans was rejected, where did the 300 kg RDX used came from and other glaring lapses that pointed a finger at the Modi government.

    Tapase said that Malik’s statements are too ‘serious’ to be brushed aside and the PM must clarify as it owes an explanation to the nation and the families of the martyred soldiers.

    Tiwari pointed out that Malik’s explosive revelations pointed fingers at the PM, the Home Ministry and Defence Ministry and could have possible ‘national security ramifications’.

    “What Malik has exposed may be like the tip of the iceberg. What exactly is underneath that has not yet come to light, what does it portend for the country’s internal and external security, and why it has been kept suppressed for over 4 years,” Tiwari asked, saying this needs an independent investigation.

    Referring to Malik’s allegations that RSS leader Ram Madhav had offered him a bribe of Rs 300 crore, the Congress leader said this is coming from a former governor appointed by Modi and BJP who claim that they will not spare any corrupt person. “But now, they are themselves completely silent on this.”

    “All these statements made openly by a senior BJP leader deepen the suspicions on the government and so it is up to PM Modi himself to disclose the true facts in this matter,” urged Patole.

    Tiwari warned that if the BJP attempts to bury Malik’s allegations under the carpet, then it will be deemed as not only true but tantamount to a deliberate fraud played on the people, the farmers and the soldiers of the country who lay their lives for the nation.

    [ad_2]
    #Modi #silent #Satya #Pal #Maliks #revelations #questions #MVA

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • UP: 183 encountered since Mar 2017, activists pose questions

    UP: 183 encountered since Mar 2017, activists pose questions

    [ad_1]

    Lucknow: With the killing of gangster-politician Atiq Ahmad’s son Asad and his aide in Jhansi, the number of alleged criminals gunned down in police encounters in Uttar Pradesh has risen to 183 in the six years of Yogi Adityanath’s government, officials said.

    The UP Police data showed that more than 10,900 police encounters have taken place in the state since March 2017, when Adityanath took over as the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh for the first time.

    In these encounters, 23,300 alleged criminals were arrested and 5,046 were injured.

    MS Education Academy

    The number of policemen injured in them was 1,443 and 13 were killed, the data showed.

    Of the 13 policemen killed in encounters since March 2017, eight were ambushed in a narrow lane in a village in Kanpur district by the aides of notorious gangster Vikas Dubey.

    Dubey was shot dead by police when he tried to escape while being brought to UP from Ujjain in Madhya Pradesh. Police said Dubey’s vehicle had overturned during the transit and he had snatched a policeman’s gun.

    “As many as 183 criminals have been gunned down in police encounters in the state since March 20, 2017,” Special Director General of Police (Law and Order) Prashant Kumar told PTI.

    However, the opposition parties and the critics of the government have alleged that many of these encounters were “fake” and demanded a high-level probe to bring out the facts. The UP government and the police have denied these allegations and said law and order has improved since the BJP came to power in 2017.

    The demand for a thorough probe was most recently raised by Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav and Bahujan Samaj Party supremo Mayawati after Asad and his aide Ghulam were shot dead in Jhansi on Thursday.

    Both Asad and Ghulam were wanted for the daylight murder of Umesh Pal, a key witness in the killing of then BSP legislator Raju Pal in 2005, and his two security guards in Prayagraj in February this year.

    Hours after their killing in Jhansi, Yadav suggested the police encounter could be “fake”.

    “By doing fake encounters, the BJP government is trying to divert attention from real issues. The BJP does not believe in courts at all. Today’s and other recent encounters should be thoroughly investigated and the culprits should not be spared. The government does not have the right to decide what is right or wrong. The BJP is against brotherhood,” he said in a tweet in Hindi.

    Shortly thereafter, Mayawati too demanded a “high-level” investigation to bring out “complete facts and truth” of the incident as “many types of discussions” were happening. She also linked the encounter to Dubey’s killing.

    But Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya has congratulated the police on the action.

    “Nobody will touch you if you don’t commit a crime. And nobody will be spared if they commit a crime,” Maurya said, asserting that this was a BJP government and not an SP regime that criminals would be spared.

    Some activists too have raised questions over the high number of police encounters in the state.

    “We are of the view that the National Human Rights Commission has some guidelines on police encounters. And there should be a magisterial probe as per the guidelines of the NHRC. It will make the picture clear,” Lenin Raghuvanshi, the founder-convenor of People’s Vigilance Committee on Human Rights, told PTI.

    Thursday’s encounter killing of Atiq Ahmad’s son and his aide was the seventh under Prayagraj police commissionerate. It was also the third such encounter in the Umesh Pal murder case.

    In February and March, two men who allegedly took part in Umesh Pal’s killing were gunned down.

    Asad was caught on CCTV when Umesh Pal was killed and was on the run for 50 days, police said.

    Atiq Ahmad, a former SP legislator, has expressed fear that he himself could be killed by UP Police while being brought to Prayagraj from an Ahmedabad prison, where he was lodged in connection with another case.

    [ad_2]
    #encountered #Mar #activists #pose #questions

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Tim Scott gets tripped up on abortion ban questions

    Tim Scott gets tripped up on abortion ban questions

    [ad_1]

    election 2024 scott 45358

    By Thursday morning in New Hampshire, Scott said he did believe some type of federal restriction should be implemented, and said if president, he would “definitely” sign into law a 20-week ban — a measure he has supported in the Senate.

    “We have to have a federal limit on how far we can go, and that is something that we have to discuss,” Scott said in a local television interview in Manchester.

    Pressed later on the issue outside the Red Arrow Diner in Manchester, Scott deflected — accusing Democrats of hypocrisy and raising objections to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen suggesting that abortions could increase the African American workforce. He did not elaborate on how far the federal government should go to restrict abortions.

    Scott is expected to hinge a potential presidential campaign on his Christian faith and court the evangelical vote — a voting bloc that overwhelmingly opposes abortion rights. But his answers over the past 24 hours suggest that he believes Republicans have done themselves no electoral favors by celebrating recent abortion restrictions and calling for sweeping national bans.

    But by the standards of many in the GOP — and as red states around the country have passed six-week and even total bans — the 20-week ban that Scott said he would sign does not go far enough. Scott’s reluctance to weigh in on earlier, more restrictive bans illustrates the fine line he and other Republican White House hopefuls must walk. Former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley has similarly avoided providing specifics about her position on a national ban, while former President Donald Trump has suggested that Republicans suffered electorally by not embracing exceptions to their abortion ban bills.

    Scott in 2021 co-sponsored the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, a bill that proposed jailing doctors for up to five years for performing abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Scott did not directly answer a question about whether he agreed with prosecuting doctors who did so. He has, however, condemned a bill introduced in the South Carolina legislature that could impose the death penalty on women receiving abortions.

    [ad_2]
    #Tim #Scott #tripped #abortion #ban #questions
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • DE Jammu University Assignment questions & Notification and time table of MA urdu

    [ad_1]

    DE Jammu University Assignment questions & Notification and time table of MA urdu

    Semester: 3rd

    Dated: 13-4-23

    For Assignment questions & Notification and time table of MA urdu click link below:

    Assignment questions of Course No 303 and 306 in MA urdu 3rd semester (23/4/23)

    Notification and time table of MA urdu 3rd semester for the session 2021-22 (13/4/23)

    Install “Sarkari Naukri, Pvt Jobs, Trusted & Breaking News App” Highest Installs in J&K – Click me to Install

    Install The News Caravan App for Android and Iphone

    app installs android

    app installs


    JKSSB Govt Jobs – Check Updates
    Bank Jobs, IBPS, All Banks Updates
    Jammu & Kashmir News Check All Latest News from J&K
    Government Jobs, Private Jobs – Check All Jobs Updates




    [ad_2] #Jammu #University #Assignment #questions #Notification #time #table #urdu( With inputs from : The News Caravan.com )

  • Rahul ‘mercilessly attacked’ for raising questions, says Priyanka Gandhi

    Rahul ‘mercilessly attacked’ for raising questions, says Priyanka Gandhi

    [ad_1]

    Wayanad: Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi on Tuesday made a scathing attack against the Centre and charged that the whole BJP dispensation was “mercilessly attacking” her brother Rahul Gandhi, and that the Prime Minister himself found it appropriate to malign him just because he asks questions.

    Addressing a mass public meeting organised by UDF workers here, she said Rahul’s future as Wayanad MP was now in the hands of the court.

    She said it was a strange thing for her to know that for the time being he has been disqualified from even fighting another election for eight years.

    MS Education Academy

    Stressing that it was the duty of a Parliamentarian to ask questions, to demand accountability and to raise issues, Priyanka also said it was a right enshrined in the Constitution that we are free to express ourselves, free to ask, free to debate and free to dissent.

    “I find it is even stranger that the whole government, every minister, every MP and even the Prime Minister himself finds it acceptable and appropriate to malign and mercilessly attack one man just because he asks the questions they cannot respond to,” she said.

    Without naming anyone, she said truth was an uncomfortable thing “especially for those who lie and those who unleash an industrial scale of propaganda” against anyone who dares to question them.

    Pointing out that India was a nation built on the foundation of truth, non-violence, equality and justice, she said the satyagraha struggles during the time of freedom movement were also a fight for truth.

    She questioned BJP leaders’ charge that the Congress party had taken one man’s issue to be the issue of democracy.

    “It seems to be exactly the opposite. The entire government and the BJP are trying to turn democracy upside down just to protect one man. His name is Gautam Adani,” she said.

    Priyanka also said that the country was at a crossroads and what had happened to her brother was just a “symptom”.

    “It is a symptom how far we are on the path of dictatorship today,” she said.

    Attacking Narendra Modi, she said the prime minister felt responsible for defending Adani but felt no responsibility towards the people of the country, “This government believes that it owns India, but India belongs to you, my brothers and sisters,” she said.

    Describing Rahul as a “brave” and “compassionate” man, Priyanka said he was “undaunted” by the power of those who try to silence him.

    She said the people of Wayanad, his home constituency, know that he is a compassionate man who is ready to hear their issues and struggles and ready to lend them a helping hand.

    “He has raised your issues…he tried to resolve your problems…he has worked hard for you…he has stood by your difficult times,” she said.

    She said his future as an MP was in the hands of the court but he would keep on asking questions.

    “We will not stop asking questions. We will question them. We will ask for accountability. We will keep speaking the truth,” Priyanka added.

    [ad_2]
    #Rahul #mercilessly #attacked #raising #questions #Priyanka #Gandhi

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • HC questions Centre for not giving any reasons over blocking Twitter accounts

    HC questions Centre for not giving any reasons over blocking Twitter accounts

    [ad_1]

    Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court on Monday asked the central government why it had not given any reasons for blocking some accounts on Twitter in light of the takedown orders issued last year.

    The bench of Justice Krishna S Dixit, which is hearing a petition by Twitter challenging the various takedown orders of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY), asked the government counsel, “Why you did not supply the reasons to them (Twitter). What is that you wish to withhold? Court wants to know what is so much an important thing which prevented the government from disclosing the reasons when the section (69A) uses the word ‘reasons to be recorded’.”

    When asked by the HC bench if the response would be provided to the court, counsel Kumar M N replied that “whatever decision is made can be supplied to the court.”

    MS Education Academy

    The court also observed that the world was moving towards transparency and Section 69A of the Information Technology Act requires recording of reasons for takedowns.

    “The whole world is moving towards transparency. If it would have been regarding sovereignty etc., we would have understood. You called them for the meeting and you did not agree with the reasons given by them and passed the impugned order. Is it not necessary for him to know why you do not agree with his reasons?” the court said.

    Twitter approached the HC in June 2022 against the orders issued by the ministry.

    The Centre had argued that Twitter being a foreign entity cannot claim enforcement of fundamental rights. Objecting to this, Twitter informed the court that it was invoking the writ jurisdiction for violation of protocols prescribed under Section 69A of the IT Act. It also claimed in a rejoinder to the court that rights under Article 14 were available to foreign entities also.

    The court then asked both Twitter and the Union government to clarify the issue of how Indian entities would be treated in the United States and foreign jurisdictions on such issues.

    “In other jurisdictions whether disclosure of reason is treated as a matter of force or whether the government can withhold reasons? Whether any element of state sovereignty is involved in this? How would the USA have treated an Indian entity before it? That also needs to be addressed,” the court asked, adjourning the hearing to April 12.

    Twitter has claimed that the government was required to issue notice to the owners of the Twitter handles against whom blocking orders are issued. Twitter had said that it was barred from informing the account holders about the takedown orders of the government.

    [ad_2]
    #questions #Centre #giving #reasons #blocking #Twitter #accounts

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )