Tag: quashes

  • High Court Quashes PSA Detention Of Two South Kashmir Youth

    High Court Quashes PSA Detention Of Two South Kashmir Youth

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: The High Court of Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh has quashed the detention of two persons from south Kashmir’s Anantnag district lodged in Central Jail Kot Balwal Jammu under the Public Safety Act (PSA).

    The detainees – Muhammad Abbas Khan, son of Nazir Ahmed Khan and Hadayat Ullah Kuttay, son of Abdul Razak Kuttay, both residents of Srigufwara Anantnag had been arrested in April last year and subsequently, shifted to Kot Balwal Jail under Public Safety Act.

    The detention orders under PSA were issued by District Magistrate Anantnag vide numbers 07 and 08/DMA/PSA/DET/2022 dated 08.04.2022. The duo was accused of being militant sympathizers.

    The counsel for both the petitioners’ Advocate Bashir Ahmed Tak challenged the impugned order on the grounds that the allegations made on the grounds of detention are vague and non-existent and that there has been non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority.

    Advocate Bashir Ahmed Tak argued that the detaining authority has not attributed any specific allegation against the detainees. He contended that the detainees were arrested in old cases and on frivolous charges.

    The court of Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul accordingly quashed the detention of both persons and ordered their release from the Kot Balwal Jail.

    [ad_2]
    #High #Court #Quashes #PSA #Detention #South #Kashmir #Youth

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Kerala HC quashes ‘underwear’ case against Minister Antony Raju

    Kerala HC quashes ‘underwear’ case against Minister Antony Raju

    [ad_1]

    Kochi: The Kerala High Court (HC) on Friday quashed the case of an alleged ‘underwear’ evidence tampering against State Transport Minister Antony Raju.

    The court gave the verdict on a plea moved by Raju to quash the case against him.

    The case dates back to the year 1990 when Raju was a junior lawyer representing an Australian citizen Andrew Salvatore Cervelli, who was accused of smuggling hashish by concealing it in his underwear.

    When Cervelli approached the HC in appeal against his conviction by a trial court more than 30 years ago, the underwear in question was found to have mysteriously shrunk in size, leading the HC to acquit Cervelli of all charges.

    A few years later, the investigating officer in the smuggling case, approached the HC seeking a probe into the alleged evidence tampering.

    Later, an FIR was registered against Raju in 1994 on a complaint filed by an official of the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram.

    After 12 years of investigation, in 2006, the Assistant Commissioner of Police filed a charge- sheet before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvananthapuram, alleging offences under charges of criminal conspiracy, cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property and causing disappearance of evidence of offence.

    It was Raju’s argument that the crucial piece of “underwear evidence” was in the custody of the trial court while it was allegedly tampered with and, therefore, it should have been the court in question that initiated the proceedings to look into the case.

    But in this case, the proceedings were initiated on the complaint of the police.

    His plea pointed out that the court took cognisance of the case upon a charge-sheet by the police and the police have no authority to conduct an investigation in such cases.

    The police also cannot file a charge-sheet before the court and the proceedings pending before the court is ‘non-est’ (one that can be ignored altogether) in the eye of law.

    Expressing happiness over the verdict, Raju said he was targeted politically by the then Chief Minister Oommen Chandy and a State Minister who was later defeated by him by going ahead with the case.

    “I knew I had done no wrong and now I am cleared and at this time I forgive those who worked against me,” said Raju.

    [ad_2]
    #Kerala #quashes #underwear #case #Minister #Antony #Raju

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Karnataka court quashes rape case lodged by daughter against father

    Karnataka court quashes rape case lodged by daughter against father

    [ad_1]

    Dakshina Kannada: In a rare case, a POCSO court in Karnataka’s Mangaluru on Thursday quashed the rape case filed against a man by his daughter on Thursday for the lack of evidence.

    Two daughters of the accused had lodged separate cases against him with the Mangaluru Women’s Police station in June 2021, alleging that he had raped them when they were minors.

    The younger daughter alleged that her father had raped her continuously for three years.

    The Additional Sessions and Second Fast Track Pocso Court, which had taken up this case for inquiry, had stated that there is no evidence against the accused to prove charges against him.

    Judge K.M. Radhakrishna has ordered the release of the accused, who was in jail for one and a half years.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Karnataka #court #quashes #rape #case #lodged #daughter #father

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • HC quashes special court’s ‘cryptic’ order rejecting Navlakha’s bail plea

    HC quashes special court’s ‘cryptic’ order rejecting Navlakha’s bail plea

    [ad_1]

    Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Thursday quashed a “cryptic” order of a special court rejecting bail to activist Gautam Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, and directed the special judge to rehear his bail plea.

    A division bench of Justices A S Gadkari and P D Naik noted that the special court’s order did not contain an analysis of the evidence relied upon by the prosecution, as it directed the special judge to conclude the fresh hearing within 4 weeks.

    The 70-year-old social activist had moved HC challenging the September 5, 2022 order under the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act refusing him bail on merits.

    The high court briefly heard the arguments put forth by Navlakha’s counsel Yug Chaudhary this week but opined that the reasoning in the order of the special court was “cryptic” and said it didn’t get the benefit of a reasoned order.

    “No reason of whatever nature is given. Trial court has not given reasoning as required under section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) while rejecting bail,” the bench said on Thursday.

    The HC said the bail plea requires a fresh hearing by the special court and sent it back to the latter.

    “The special judge is requested to conclude within 4 weeks without being influenced from September 5 order and this order of today. It is made clear that this court has not made any opinion on merits,” HC said.

    Navlakha was arrested in August 2018 but was initially placed under house arrest.

    He was later moved to the Taloja Central Prison near Mumbai in April 2020 after a Supreme Court order.

    However, on November 10 last year, the Supreme Court allowed his plea to be shifted back to house arrest for a month. This was extended by another month on December 13.

    He is presently residing in Navi Mumbai in Maharashtra’s Thane district.

    The NIA opposed Navlakha’s bail plea by claiming that he had been introduced to a Pakistan Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) General for his “recruitment”. This shows his “nexus” with the spy organisation, said the federal agency.

    The case relates to alleged inflammatory speeches made at the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017 which the police claim triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial on the outskirts of the western Maharashtra city.

    [ad_2]
    #quashes #special #courts #cryptic #order #rejecting #Navlakhas #bail #plea

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • MLAs poaching: Telangana HC quashes state’s appeal; CBI to take over case

    MLAs poaching: Telangana HC quashes state’s appeal; CBI to take over case

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: In another setback to the Telangana government, the state High Court on Monday dismissed its appeal challenging the transfer of the investigation into the MLAs poaching case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

    The division bench comprising Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice N. Tukaramji dismissed the petitions of the state government and MLA Pilot Rohit Reddy challenging the order of the single judge transferring to the CBI the case relating to the alleged attempt to poach four legislators of the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS).

    The division bench ruled that the single judge bench’s order can’t be faulted and interfered with.

    The division bench’s order paved the way for CBI investigation into the sensational case. The High Court did not accept the request of the Advocate General to stay the implementation of the order as the state government plans to challenge the same in the Supreme Court.

    On December 27, 2022, Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy ordered the transfer of the MLAs’ Poachgate case to the CBI. The High Court had also quashed a Government Order under which a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was constituted by the state government to probe the case.

    The single judge had pronounced the order on the petitions filed by the accused priest Ramchandra Bharati, pontiff Simhayaji, and restaurant owner Nandu Kumar that they did not have faith in the SIT investigation.

    The judge had also observed that the media should not have been given access to investigation material. He also noted that the state has not responded to the question who provided the Chief Minister with investigative materials.

    During the hearing on an appeal filed by the state government, Supreme Court advocate and senior counsel Dushyant Dave had faulted the order of the single judge for coming to a conclusion based on apprehensions of the accused and the BJP without any material beyond reasonable doubt.

    Dave told the court that once evidence was submitted to the court, it becomes a public document and such revealing of the public document by Chief Minister to the media cannot be considered as leakage of material by the investigating agency. He pointed out that while the BJP was toppling State governments by defecting MLAs from other parties across the country, there was nothing wrong about the Chief Minister of Telangana bringing to the notice of millions of voters the politics played by BJP.

    The three accused were arrested by Cyberabad police from a farmhouse at Moinabad near Hyderabad on the night of October 26, 2022 when they were allegedly trying to lure four MLAs of BRS with offers of huge money.

    Cyberabad police conducted the raid on a tip-off by Pilot Rohit Reddy, one of the MLAs. He alleged that the accused offered Rs 100 crore to him and Rs 50 crore each to three others to make them defect to BJP.

    The state government had subsequently constituted SIT headed by Hyderabad Police commissioner C.V. Anand to probe the case.

    BJP general secretary B.L. Santosh,ABharath Dharma Jana Sena (BDJS) president Tushar Vellapally and a doctor from Kerala, Jaggu Swamy, lawyers Srinivas and Pratap Goud and Nanda Kumar’s wife Chitralekha were also summoned by the SIT for questioning.

    Santosh, Tushar and Jaggu Swamy had approached the High Court and secured a stay on the notices.

    The high court on December 1 granted conditional bail to the accused.

    However, Ramachandra Bharati and Nanda Kumar were re-arrested by the police soon after their release from jail on December 8 in connection with other cases registered against them.

    While Ramachandra Bharati was booked for holding multiple passports, Aadhaar cards and other documents, five cases were registered against Nanda Kumar for cheating and other offences.

    [ad_2]
    #MLAs #poaching #Telangana #quashes #states #appeal #CBI #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )