Tag: Project

  • JK’s Hydroelectric Project Progress Disappoints, Says CAG Report

    JK’s Hydroelectric Project Progress Disappoints, Says CAG Report

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: In what could raise questions on J&K Government’s capacity to harness water resources, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India has revealed that only 10 micro/mini/small hydel power projects with the capacity of 79.75 MWs (five percent) have been commissioned in Jammu & Kashmir against 374 identified project sites with power generation capacity of 1,725.53 MWs.

    According to the auditor’s findings on the progress of micro/mini/small hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir, only 10 projects with a total capacity of 79.75 MWs (five percent) have been commissioned out of the 374 identified project sites capable of generating 1,725.53 MWs. The report further indicates that these projects faced time overruns ranging from four months to over seven years.

    “While no action was taken for 225 sites (60 per cent) after their identification, bids were invited for 115 sites (31 per cent) only. No response was received for 70 sites and out of 45 sites awarded for development of hydro power projects, 32 IPPs either failed to fulfil commitments like obtaining statutory clearances for execution of projects or did not deposit upfront premium or the allotment of projects was terminated due to land issues, slow progress and techno economic viability reasons,” reads the report.

    The audit also pointed out that Jammu & Kashmir couldn’t avail Rs 2000 crore proposed for the development of small hydroelectric projects under the Prime Minister’s Development Package announced in 2015.

    “For 20 sites proposed under Prime Minister’s Development Package (PMDP), GoI had not acceded to the request of the Government of J&K for the release of funds. The project “Implementation of Small Hydro power projects” with provision Rs 2,000 crore was sanctioned (November 2015) under PMDP. The Board of Directors (BoD) of JKPDC in its 73rd meeting (October 2017) accorded approval for implementation of 20 projects through EPC mode to be funded under PMDP as well as funds to be arranged by Power Development Department subject to their viability vis-à-vis evacuation of power. The request of Government of J&K for release of funds under PMDP was not acceded by GoI in view of high project cost and unviable tariff of these 20 projects as a result the JKPDC could not avail assistance from GoI,” the report states.

    [ad_2]
    #JKs #Hydroelectric #Project #Progress #Disappoints #CAG #Report

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Telangana vs Centre again, now on the Kaleshwaram project

    Telangana vs Centre again, now on the Kaleshwaram project

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: The subject of ‘national status’ to the Kaleshwaram project led to a fierce battle between Telangana finance minister T Harish Rao and union minister Bishweswar Tudu on Friday.

    Bisweshwar Tudu in response to Mahabubnagar MP Manne Srinivas Reddy’s query on the subject told the Lok Sabha that the Telangana government had not submitted any proposal to the Centre to include the Kaleshwaram or Palamuru Rangareddy projects in the National Project scheme.

    Harish Rao, as a response, called the minister’s words ‘false propaganda’ and stated that the minister was misleading the Parliament and the people of the state.

    On Twitter, Harish Rao produced letters written by chief minister K Chandrashekhar Rao to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the state government’s letters to the Ministry of Water Resources in the past seeking national status for the Kaleshwaram project.

    ‘”False propaganda by the BJP party’s Union Minister that Telangana Govt has not submitted proposal for National Project status to Kaleshwaram Project. Hon’ble CM KCR Garu & me as Irrigation Minister made several representations to @PMOIndia and Minister of Water Resources for National status to Kaleshwaram.

    As quoted by BJP Minister Shri @Bishweswar_Tudu ji on the floor of parliament is blatant lie and misleading the house and the people as well. Kaleshwaram project has accorded all Clearances from CWC and also got approval from Technical advisory committee of Ministry of Jal Shakti. Thereafter #CMKCR Garu requested PM Narendra Modi to accord National status to Kaleshwaram Project. But no action has been initiated by GoI,” he said in a series of tweets.

    Harish Rao said that the former Minister for Water Resource, Nitin Gadkari, to questions raised by BRS MPs in the Parliament in 2018, replied that GoI has no plans to accord national project status to any project in the future.

    “When BRS MP’s had raised issue of national project status to Kaleshwaram in 2018 Parliament sessions, Former Minister for Water Resource Sri Nitin Gadkari ji replied that GoI has no plans to accord national project status to any project in future.

    Contrary to his statement GoI accorded National project status to Upper Bhadra Project of Karnataka and Ken-Betwa project of MP as both are BJP ruled states. But the request of TS Govt was denied.

    It is nothing but political vengenance of Center Govt led by BJP on Telangana,” he said in another tweet.

    The minister further said that the Upper Bhadra project in Karnataka, which is a BJP-ruled state got the national status in spite of the subject being subjudice in the Supreme Court.

    “CWC accorded approval to the Upper Bhadra Project of Karnataka, a BJP ruled State when KWDT II award was stayed by SC in 2013. CWC accorded clearances to Upper Bhadra Project and GoI also accorded NP status for a project when the whole matter was subjudice

    For Kaleshwaram everything is clear but no NP status accorded inspite of repeated requests by TS. Is it not political vengenance?



    [ad_2]
    #Telangana #Centre #Kaleshwaram #project

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Telangana must first submit proposal to seek national project status: Centre

    Telangana must first submit proposal to seek national project status: Centre

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: Following regular criticism from the Telangana government, the Centre on Thursday told the Lok Sabha that in order to seek National Project (NP) status for Kaleshwaram and Palamuru Rangareddy lift irrigation schemes, the state must first file a proposal and send it to the Jal Shakti ministry.

    The Bharat Rashtra Smaithi (BRS) government has been regularly demanding the Centre to sanction National Project status to any project in Telangana, especially Kaleshwaram.

    Minister of State for Jal Shakti Bishweswar Tudu while replying to a question by Congress MP Komatireddy Venkat Reddy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, said that for inclusion of a project for funding under the NP scheme of Jal Shakti Ministry, it is required to be first appraised by Central Water Commission (CWC), and accepted by the Advisory Committee on Irrigation, Flood Control and Multipurpose Projects.

    The minister held that a proposal by the state, in the prescribed format for the inclusion of the project under the NP scheme is step one to be put forward for approval, adding that the Centre and state funds ratio would be 60:40 if the NP scheme is sanctioned.

    “As per norms laid down for the NP scheme, the project is then required to be considered by the ‘High Powered Steering Committee (HPSC) that will examine whether it meets the contours of the NP scheme,” Tudu added.

    “On being recommended by HPSC, and as per availability of fund, the Government of India may approve the inclusion of a project under the National Projects scheme,” the minister said.

    [ad_2]
    #Telangana #submit #proposal #seek #national #project #status #Centre

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Murkowski won big time with Biden’s oil project. She knows it, too.

    Murkowski won big time with Biden’s oil project. She knows it, too.

    [ad_1]

    The massive ConocoPhillips endeavor, called the Willow project, will at its peak produce 180,000 barrels of oil a day across 68,000 acres inside the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. Advocates say it will be an economic game changer for the state and even the nation, while environmentalists called it Biden’s single biggest climate betrayal since taking office.

    Murkowski can take much of the credit for the result. In an interview with POLITICO’s E&E News on Monday afternoon, the Republican said she didn’t think it was “any great secret” that Biden was influenced, in part, by politics, as he weighed the inevitable backlash from green activists and fellow Democrats versus voters’ worries about rising energy costs and reliance on foreign oil.

    “I think in terms of the president’s engagement in this, a single state project … doesn’t get elevated to the presidential level, to the senior team, unless there’s political interest,” she said.

    But Murkowski also traced Biden’s decision back to the carefully orchestrated pressure and education campaign she conducted around the president and his senior team.

    “When he was first was elected, I made sure that he knew — by way of letter, by way of any time I saw him — I would mention [Willow] until it became almost a bit of a joke because he knew that I was going to raise it,” Murkowski recalled. “And equally so with his senior team. I made clear that they knew.”

    ‘Relationships matter’

    When it came to Willow, as Murkowski’s conversations with the administration were first getting under way in early 2021, she agreed to support Biden’s pick for Interior secretary, then-New Mexico Democratic Rep. Deb Haaland, despite her concerns about the nominee’s far-left environmental record.

    Shortly thereafter, the Biden Justice Department announced it would defend Willow in court against litigation from activists alleging the ConocoPhillips project would be devastating to the environment — a seeming reversal from a president who promised, during his 2020 campaign, “no more drilling on federal lands, period.”

    Then, Biden’s initial selection for deputy Interior secretary, Liz Klein, was swapped out for Tommy Beaudreau, who held a variety of posts in the Obama Interior Department. Most important for Murkowski, Beaudreau also had a reputation for being more friendly to oil and gas interests, had ties to Alaska and enjoyed a longstanding rapport with the state’s senior senator.

    In fact, Murkowski was instrumental in convincing Biden to nominate him for assistant secretary instead of Klein — Murkowski and others perceived Klein as hostile to fossil fuel interests. Klein is now the director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, a position Beaudreau once held himself.

    Beaudreau’s nomination for the deputy secretary position, paired with the administration’s posture surrounding Willow in the courts, was a turning point for Murkowski in her dealings with the Biden Interior Department.

    “Relationships matter,” she said in the interview Monday. “We worked with one another for a while, had a very respectful relationship, and so when [Beaudreau] came into the Biden administration, it was easy to sit and talk with him because we had had a good foundation previously, and so that, I think, is important.”

    Murkowski said she “needed to be able to be direct and frank with” Beaudreau. On the flip side, she said, “he needed to be honest with the fact that, ‘Look, you got … a president that ran on a platform really focused on climate, who made “no new oil and gas” statements, kind of a view towards energy that was really going to be challenging and difficult for a state like Alaska,’ where we rely on resources, particularly oil resources, for revenue, for jobs, for everything.”

    Through those conversations, Murkowski realized, she needed to form relationships beyond the one she had with Beaudreau if she wanted to impact policy — and secure Willow’s future. She honed in on Louisa Terrell, the White House director of legislative affairs, and Steve Ricchetti, a top Biden aide.

    “Just sitting down and talking to them, one on one, with no agenda other than, ‘I’m Lisa, this is my state, let me tell you what’s important,’” Murkowski said of her approach. “Building relationships helped me as I navigated some folks who really, really were not inclined to support the Willow project.”

    It also necessitated a level of dealmaking, she acknowledged: “‘Yeah, I can help you on some of the EV stuff,’” she recalled telling the White House during negotiations over the bipartisan infrastructure package, “‘but one of these days, we’re going to want to see EV ferries out there.’”

    In July, Murkowski announced $300 million would be made available for the electrification of ferries through that infrastructure law, which would benefit Alaska.

    White House vs. Interior

    It was not just Murkowski who exerted pressure. Alaska’s entire three-member congressional delegation played a role, and they took collective credit for forcing Biden’s hand Monday.

    In a call with reporters Monday morning that served as a victory lap, Murkowski, Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan and Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola detailed the coordinated full-court press to sway the administration in its final stages of decisionmaking, culminating in an hourlong meeting in the Oval Office with Biden on March 3.

    There, Murkowski emphasized Willow’s economic advantages, Sullivan the geopolitical implications and Peltola the diverse constituencies supporting the project on the ground, including Alaska Natives.

    “The decision was ultimately going to be made at the White House level — not only with senior leaders, but the president’s direct involvement himself,” Murkowski asserted during that call. “The president had clearly been apprised of Willow, of what Willow was and why it was a priority for us.”

    Although she voted for Haaland for Interior Secretary, Murkowski has been deeply critical of her leadership of the department. She is also scornful of other top Interior officials she has accused of turning a blind eye to Alaska’s unique circumstances. Alaska officials have long said stewardship of the state’s environment needs to be balanced with support for energy development, the latter of which powers the state and funds social services.

    On Monday, she didn’t hesitate to credit the Biden administration for the decision while suggesting some inside Interior were seeking to undercut it.

    “Were there people … within the Department of the Interior that were working to actively kill this? Absolutely, positively, and I don’t think you have to name names,” Murkowski asserted, adding, “This was not something that I think was ultimately going to reside with the secretary of the Interior.”

    The exception to that rule continues to be Beaudreau, who Murkowski said reached out to her personally to “walk me through the specific details” of the administration’s announcements relating to energy extraction activities on federal lands around the state.

    Biden’s ‘promise’

    As Alaska lawmakers celebrated the news Monday, climate hawks were aghast at the administration’s greenlighting of the Willow project as a surrender on multiple fronts.

    “I’m sure they had a significant impact, there’s no doubt about it,” said Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) of the Alaska delegation on a press call with representatives from the Alaska Wilderness League and the Sierra Club on Monday afternoon. “They brought the political pressure. … None of that is surprising. What is surprising, and frankly very disappointing, is that a decision like this came down to politics.”

    Sierra Club executive director Ben Jealous agreed: “No doubt this will help with the reelection of every member of the Alaska delegation.”

    In the upcoming election cycle, no member of the trio stands to benefit more than Peltola, the first Alaska Native to represent the state who won a special election last summer to succeed late-Republican Rep. Don Young.

    Peltola, a member of the House Natural Resources Committee alongside Huffman, was just added to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s list of most vulnerable incumbents for 2024.

    “Getting Willow across the finish line is something I campaigned very hard on,” she said Monday. “I knew this had to be a priority of anybody who was the position I’m in.”

    But, Jealous added, “it’s hard to see how this really adds up for President Biden. … His political calculation and his climate calculation may have made sense in the last century, but it’s clearly less suited for this century we’re in … both on politics and on preventing human extinction.”

    Murkowski, in her interview, dismissed accusations of Biden’s “capitulation” to fossil fuel interests.

    “The only promise the president ever made to me on Willow was that he was going to listen to me,” she said.

    He listened, Murkowski said, to the facts about Alaska’s environmental standards and the myriad ways Alaskans depend on the extraction industry, “and he evaluated that against everything else that he had coming at him, and all the politics that he knew were going to be thrown at him.”

    Her conclusion: “I think he evaluated it clearly,” she said, “and he made the right decision.”

    A version of this report first ran in E&E News’ E&E Daily. Get access to more comprehensive and in-depth reporting on the energy transition, natural resources, climate change and more in E&E News.



    [ad_2]
    #Murkowski #won #big #time #Bidens #oil #project
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Greens sue Biden over Willow oil project approval

    Greens sue Biden over Willow oil project approval

    [ad_1]

    alaska oil project climate 74810

    BLM failed to follow requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act to consider alternatives that would lessen the project’s impact on the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska, or NPR-A, or to take a required “hard look” at the project’s cumulative impacts, including on climate change, the suit alleges.

    The groups also charge BLM with failing to consider the project’s impacts on lands used for subsistence by Alaska Natives. And the suit argues the Fish and Wildlife Service failed to properly consider Willow’s potential impacts on endangered species such as polar bears.

    “Interior attempted to put a shiny gloss over a structurally unsound decision that will, without question, result in a massive fossil fuel project that will reduce access to food and cultural practices for local communities,” Bridget Psarianos, lead attorney for Trustees for Alaska, which represents the environmental groups, said in a statement. “This new decision allows ConocoPhillips to pump out massive amounts of greenhouse gases that drive continued climate devastation in the Arctic and world. The laws broken on the way to these permits demonstrate the government’s disregard for those who would be most directly harmed by industrial pollution and ignores Alaska’s and the world’s climate reality.”

    Willow is estimated to produce about 600 million barrels of oil, with production projected to be over 180,000 barrels of oil per day at its peak.

    The project is also expected to generate around 280 million tons a year of greenhouse gases over its expected 30-year lifetime — the equivalent of two coal-burning power plants every year, according to government estimates.

    The Alaskan court in 2021 overturned a Trump-era approval of the project after determining its underlying environmental analysis was flawed.

    The suit was brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska by the Sovereign Iñupiat for a Living Arctic, Alaska Wilderness League, Environment America, Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Sierra Club and the Wilderness Society.

    The groups said a second suit spearheaded by Earthjustice, which had previously said it was reviewing the administration’s analysis of the project’s environmental impact as a basis for a possible lawsuit, will be filed soon as well.

    The Interior Department declined to comment. The White House could not be immediately reached for comment.

    [ad_2]
    #Greens #sue #Biden #Willow #oil #project #approval
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • ED arrests 4 in AP ‘Siemens Project’ money laundering case

    ED arrests 4 in AP ‘Siemens Project’ money laundering case

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Tuesday said it has arrested four people in connection with its money laundering probe into alleged diversion of Andhra Pradesh government funds meant for skilling youths in using advanced software.

    Soumyadri Shekhar Bose alias Suman Bose, former managing director (MD) of Siemens Industry Software India Pvt Ltd (SISW), Vikas Vinayak Khanvelkar, MD of Designtech Systems Pvt Ltd, Mukul Chandra Agrawal, former financial advisor and authorised signatory of Skillar Enterprises India Pvt Ltd, and Suresh Goyal, a chartered accountant, have been sent to ED custody by a special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court.

    The case pertains to diversion and misutilisation of crores of funds of the state government disbursed for implementation of “Siemens Projects” in which the government aimed at providing advanced software and technical skills to the local youth.

    The money laundering case stems from a Andhra Pradesh CID PMLA regarding swindling of government money to the extent of Rs 241 crore in a dubious manner, the agency said.

    The probe found “diversion and siphoning off government funds given to Designtech Systems Pvt Ltd through Skillar Enterprises India Pvt Ltd and thereafter, through a web of shell companies under the guise of supply of software, hardware, materials and services without any genuine supplies”, it said.

    The purpose for such diversion of funds was to generate cash and thereby, siphon off money from the system without utilising the same for the Siemens Projects for which funds were sanctioned by the government of Andhra Pradesh, it said.

    The ED said it has “established” a money trail of diversion of around Rs 70 crore till now.

    [ad_2]
    #arrests #Siemens #Project #money #laundering #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Biden’s green allies promise lawsuit over Alaska oil project

    Biden’s green allies promise lawsuit over Alaska oil project

    [ad_1]

    alaska petroleum reserve lawsuit 53666

    Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan (R) — a staunch Willow supporter — said he was already preparing to help defend the Biden administration from “frivolous legal challenges” against the $8 billion project.

    “We are coordinated and ready to defend this decision,” he told reporters Monday.

    Biden officials have sought to balance interest in continued leasing in oil- and gas-producing states like Alaska with the president’s clean energy priorities. Environmentalists who have generally backed the president’s climate initiatives have also repeatedly pushed the federal government to go even further by eliminating new oil and gas leasing on federally controlled lands.

    Cancellation of the Willow project would have been a key win to block future fossil fuel extraction on public lands. Now environmentalists’ pressure campaign against the project is transitioning to legal action against the approval process by the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management.

    Trustees for Alaska, which successfully sued to block a Trump-era Willow approval in 2020, is reviewing whether the Biden administration’s green light for the project fully complies with an earlier court order. A federal judge in 2021 blocked Willow after finding that BLM had failed to conduct an adequate analysis of the project’s environmental impacts.

    Judge Sharon Gleason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska sent BLM back to the drawing board after finding the agency had not done enough to model the impact of the project on foreign emissions, properly weigh alternative designs or approve a project that provided maximal surface area protections within the leasing area.

    BLM’s court-ordered environmental review did address the greenhouse gas modeling concerns, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t other potential problems with the agency’s emissions and impact analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act, said Psarianos of Trustees for Alaska. NEPA requires agencies to take a “hard look” at environmental impacts of major federal actions but does not require a specific outcome for a project.

    “We have some big, big questions about whether they actually complied with the NEPA requirement to assess impacts from those greenhouse gas emissions, even if they accurately quantified them,” she said.

    Environmental groups will also be looking at how BLM responded within its final approval — known as a record of decision, or ROD — to Gleason’s finding that the agency had misinterpreted its statutory authority to assume ConocoPhillips had the right to extract all the oil and gas that was under its lease.

    “The ROD does try to grapple with that,” said Psarianos.

    BLM stated that its project screening criteria were “reevaluated and augmented” to address the court’s concerns about the amount of extraction approved under the Trump administration.

    “That’s something we’re going to have to look at and dig into and see, whether that’s defensible for them,” Psarianos said.

    Environmental groups will also be looking at compliance under other statutes such as the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act, which outlines conservation requirements specifically for the Alaska petroleum reserve, also referred to as the NPR-A.

    In its new record of decision released Monday, BLM said it had responded to the concerns raised by Gleason, who was appointed during the Obama administration, and was moving forward with an alternative Willow design that “requires the fewest ice roads, fewest total miles of infield pipelines, least water use, fewest vehicle trips, fewest fixed-wing aircraft trips, fewest helicopter trips, and fewest acres of screeding.”

    The project design no longer allows gravel fill in a marine area and reduces the number of facilities, water and gravel use, and operational activities. The changes “reduce impacts to important surface resources and subsistence uses as compared to the other action alternatives,” BLM said.

    The approved alternative also had the least total greenhouse gas emissions, making the decision to move forward with the project “consistent with the principles and objectives” in 2021 climate orders issued by President Joe Biden and Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, according to BLM.

    Willow will include nearly 200 oil wells along with other supporting infrastructure. ConocoPhillips also added three boat ramps to help offset the impacts of the project to the Alaska Native community of Nuiqsut. The tiny city is located closest to the development, and its residents have strongly opposed Willow for its impacts on subsistence hunting and fishing — even as many other Alaska Native leaders have backed the project.

    BLM’s final approval includes two fewer drilling sites than what was proposed by ConocoPhillips under the Trump administration. The company had previously warned the Biden administration that approving fewer than three well sites would not be economically viable.

    ConocoPhillips praised the Biden administration’s decision Monday, saying it was compatible with White House climate and energy policies.

    ‘Huge disappointment’

    In a separate announcement Monday, the White House said it plans to protect 16 million acres of public lands and federal waters from oil and gas development — although environmental groups say the move does not offset their concerns about Willow.

    The Biden administration indefinitely withdrew 2.8 million acres of the Beaufort Sea from oil and gas leasing and announced plans for a new rulemaking to consider conservation measures for more than 13 million acres in the NPR-A that serves as important habitat for grizzly and polar bears, as well as caribou and migratory waterfowl.

    “Today’s withdrawal ensures this important habitat for whales, seals, polar bears as well as for subsistence purposes will be protected in perpetuity from extractive development,” the White House said in a memorandum.

    Psarianos said that the entire western Arctic deserves protection from oil and gas drilling.

    “The Willow approvals … would unlock a large area for industrial development,” she said. “That just in and of itself is a completely unacceptable threat for the reserve, to subsistence and to the climate.”

    Environmentalists said the Biden administration’s approval of the Willow project is in line with other oil and gas leasing decisions from Interior.

    “President Biden’s decision to approve the massive Willow fossil fuel project is undoubtedly a blow to our collective ability to address the climate crisis,” Jim Walsh, policy director of Food and Water Watch, said in a statement. “But this administration has not yet demonstrated a strong commitment to stopping new fossil fuel projects.”

    The Biden administration has already faced a series of lawsuits challenging its analysis of the risks of oil and gas leasing.

    That has included litigation over Lease Sale 258 in Alaska’s Cook Inlet, the recent lawsuit against Lease Sale 259 in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as other challenges to onshore leases and drilling permits, said Kristen Monsell, oceans program litigation director at the Center for Biological Diversity.

    Monsell said that the Biden administration’s approval of drilling permits on public lands has outpaced the rate under former President Donald Trump.

    “The Biden administration has been a huge disappointment,” she said.

    Emma Dumain contributed to this report.

    A version of this report first ran in E&E News’ Energywire. Get access to more comprehensive and in-depth reporting on the energy transition, natural resources, climate change and more in E&E News.

    [ad_2]
    #Bidens #green #allies #promise #lawsuit #Alaska #oil #project
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • IGNOU submission of Project Internship Reports of TEE

    [ad_1]

    IGNOU submission of Project Internship Reports of TEE

    Last date of Online Submission of Final Project/Dissertation/Field Work Journals/Internship Reports is 31-May-2023.

    Dated: 14-3-23

    For more information click link below:

    Online submission of Project Dissertation Field Work Journals Internship Reports for June 2023 TEE

     

     

    Install “Sarkari Naukri, Pvt Jobs, Trusted & Breaking News App” Highest Installs in J&K – Click me to Install

    Install The News Caravan App for Android and Iphone

    app installs android

    app installs


    JKSSB Govt Jobs – Check Updates
    Bank Jobs, IBPS, All Banks Updates
    Jammu & Kashmir News Check All Latest News from J&K
    Government Jobs, Private Jobs – Check All Jobs Updates




    [ad_2] #IGNOU #submission #Project #Internship #Reports #TEE( With inputs from : The News Caravan.com )

  • Madrassa Plus project to impart modern education to ‘Huffaz’

    Madrassa Plus project to impart modern education to ‘Huffaz’

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: Imparting modern education to madrassa students is nothing new. The concept is now being sought to be implemented in a different way to make it more effective and popular. The Shaheen Group of Schools along with the Sahitiya Trust, Safa Baitul Maal and other organisations, have decided to educate 5000 ‘huffaz’ (Quran memorisers) in the modern subjects right at their madrassa. Billed as the ‘Madrassa Plus’ programme, it will be implemented in a mission mode method to ensure that the madrassa students are in a position to appear for the tenth class examination in just 18 months flat.

    Beginning May 2, Madrassa Plus will be introduced for 100 students in 50 selected seminaries across the country.  Through a bridge course, the students will be taught the basics of mathematics, science and English in the first three months. Thereafter they will be imparted government schools syllabus so that they could write the tenth exam in 18 months through the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS).

    Giving details of the programme, Dr. M.A. Qadeer (Shaheen Schools), Syed Aneesuddin (Sahatiya Trust), Prof. Amirullah Khan (Economist), Maulana Ghyas Rashadi (Safa Baitul Maal) told press persons here on Monday that 50 madrassa, mostly in UP, Bihar, Rajasthan and Assam, have been chosen for execution of the programme. Huffaz in the age group of 14 to 18 years will be coached in the modern subjects. In the coming years more madrassas would be brought under the ambit of Madrassa Plus, said Dr. Qadeer who has successfully tried the Hafiz Plus programme for the Shaheen group of schools.

    For the madrassa students the whole thing will be free of cost. Food, accommodation and examination fee will be taken care of with the help of NGOs. The idea is to improve the economic status of madrassa students, who mostly remain unemployed or underemployed. “This project was actually visualised by eminent scholar, Maulana Abul Hasan Nadvi,” Maulana Rashadi said and denied that it would deprive madrassas and mosques of religious scholars.

    Presently the madrassa system of education is under threat in parts of the country. The Madrassa Plus project is intended to protect the seminaries and also provide the students there best of education on all fronts of life, Prof. Amirullah Khan said.

    [ad_2]
    #Madrassa #project #impart #modern #education #Huffaz

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )