Tag: proceedings

  • Dublin-based Aircastle seeks insolvency proceedings against SpiceJet

    Dublin-based Aircastle seeks insolvency proceedings against SpiceJet

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The next and latest in line after Go First, SpiceJet airline is facing bankruptcy proceedings as the Ireland-based aircraft lessor Aircastle Ltd has moved the principal bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to launch a bankruptcy process against the airline.

    Agreeing to hear the lessor’s plea, a two-member bench of the NCLT issued a notice to the airline and posted the matter for further consideration on May 17.

    The bench led by NCLT President Ramalingam Sudhakar directed SpiceJet to attend the hearing on the given date.

    MS Education Academy

    Claiming default in dues payment, Aircastle has sought initiation of corporate insolvency proceedings against SpiceJet.

    A spokesperson for SpiceJet commented that the notice was issued routinely in connection with the Aircastle matter.

    “In the Aircastle issue, notice was issued in normal course. There was no adverse ruling against SpiceJet. The court has recognised the fact that parties are under settlement discussions and they can continue to pursue the same,” the spokesperson said.

    “There is no impact on flight operations,” the spokesperson added.

    SpiceJet is facing a separate plea by Credit Suisse in the apex court alleging contempt of court. The case dates back to August 2022, when SpiceJet and Credit Suisse had agreed to settle a payment dispute of $24 million.

    In April this year, however, Credit Suisse moved the top court alleging that the airline had failed to pay $4.9 million, as per the terms of settlement.

    Before the top court, the airline’s counsel had assured the Supreme Court that it will make the payment in two tranches � in April and May.

    While the NCLT will hear the insolvency plea filed by Aircastle against SpiceJet on May 17, the SC will also hear Credit Suisse contempt plea to verify the payment status.

    [ad_2]
    #Dublinbased #Aircastle #seeks #insolvency #proceedings #SpiceJet

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Live streaming of court proceedings has flipside, judges need to be trained: CJI

    Live streaming of court proceedings has flipside, judges need to be trained: CJI

    [ad_1]

    Cuttack: Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud on Saturday said live streaming of court proceedings has a flipside, adding the judges need to be trained “because every word that we say is up in the public realm”.

    Speaking at the Neutral Citation for the Indian Judiciary and National Conference on Digitisation, CJI Chandrachud said: “Today, most of the High Courts are doing live streaming on YouTube. You have those little clips about a judge in the Patna High Court asking an IAS officer why he was not appropriately dressed, or somebody in the Gujarat High Court saying something about why a lawyer is not ready with her cases.

    “A lot of funny stuff is going on YouTube, which we need to control because this is serious. What happens in a court is extremely serious stuff. Live streaming we are doing has a flip side. We as judges need to train ourselves as we are now working in the age of social media,” said the CJI.

    MS Education Academy

    Chandrachud said he realised this during the live stream of constitution bench arguments.

    “Very often, citizens don’t realise that what we say in the course of hearing is to open up a dialogue. What you said does not necessarily reflect what you have decided in a case. But, people don’t understand this at large,” he said.

    “So, live streaming or interface with social media places new demands on us as judges. We need to create a robust cloud infrastructure for live streaming,” the CJI said.

    He further said there is a need for creating cloud infrastructure for live streaming and it is perhaps one way to have a central national cloud infrastructure and additional hardware for courts.

    Next important area is technical advancements which the third phase envisages and this will refer to software developments, the use of artificial intelligence, blockchain, and digital accessibility, he added.

    Stating that artificial intelligence has a flip side as well, Chandrachud said: “For instance, it would be very difficult in allowing artificial intelligence to tell us what sentence to hand down following a conviction in a criminal case.”

    Speaking about his vision to create paperless and virtual courts, the CJI said: “The Supreme Court is not the Supreme Court of Tilak Marg, it is for India, of India, by India. Likewise, each High Court is not the High Court of the capital of the state, but the citizens across the state.”

    “Odisha has opened virtual courts in 22 districts. We cannot have benches of the High Court in as many districts as we have set up virtual courts. The opening of virtual courts will ensure access to justice for all those who don’t have access to the High Court,” he pointed out.

    “Some of the finest lawyers are not only confined to the capital city of states. Many of them don’t even move to the capital cities for lack of resources and family reasons. For a variety of reasons, they are confined to their own districts. So why cannot they present their cases before the High Court?” wondered the CJI.

    He further said that the purpose of pitchforking technology is not to place it away from citizens but to reach out to the common citizens of the country. The total outlay for Phase II is Rs 7,210 crore, which is going to be executed between 2023-27.

    While Rs 2,024 crore was provided for 2023-24, Rs 1,906 crore earmarked for 2024-25, Rs 1,523 crore for 2025-26 and Rs 1,552 crore for 2026-27.

    “When we pitched for this budget, not a single rupee was cut by the Union government,” he added.



    [ad_2]
    #Live #streaming #court #proceedings #flipside #judges #trained #CJI

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • EPFO Penalty Proceedings Against Lawful Procedure: FCIK

    EPFO Penalty Proceedings Against Lawful Procedure: FCIK

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: The Federation of Chambers of Kashmir (FCIK) has taken strong exception to the penalty proceedings launched by the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EFPO) against hundreds of employers in Jammu and Kashmir valley under section 14B of the Provident Fund Act for making belated payments after respective due dates of filling of returns during January 2019 to April 2023 and has termed the action against the procedure established by law.

    In a statement, the FCIK has challenged the prudence of the organisation for having invoked section 14B of the Act which could only be done under concrete evidence regarding any culpable state of mind of the employer while committing default in timely remittances. FCIK stated that the action taken by EPFO had sent shockwaves to employers for the reason that this provision of the Provident Fund Act was extremely harsh and envisaged for recoveries through coercive methodology including attaching bank accounts and properties.

     

    1320x120 ad feed desktop

    FCIK regretted that EPFO J&K had completely played ignorant to the prolonged lockdowns during the reorganization of state, Covid restrictions coupled with snapping of internet services which had led to complete halt to business activities in Jammu and Kashmir during aforementioned time period and has asked that how could EPFO expect employers to follow normal rules and regulations under most abnormal conditions when the very movement of people had been restricted.

    FCIK has taken up the matter with Central Provident Fund Commissioner GOI with a plea to quash the demands raised by EPFO against J&K employers. While giving an overview of the operational and economic conditions of enterprises in J&K particularly in Kashmir valley, FCIK has solicited intervention of the CPFC for quashing of demands raised by EPFO J&K against employers for penal damages including interest and administrative charges during the period of January 2019 to April 2023. The waiver of penal damages was also sought in consideration of Central Provident Fund Organisation’s own Circular No C-1/Misc./2020-21/vol.1/1112 dated 15-05-2020 and relevant apex Court directions, reads the statement of FCIK.

     

     

     

     

     

    Previous articlePoonch Attack: Over Dozen Detained For Questioning As Search Operation Continues
    16c0b9a15388d494e61bc20a8a6a07ba?s=96&d=mm&r=g

    [ad_2]
    #EPFO #Penalty #Proceedings #Lawful #Procedure #FCIK

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • SC quashes criminal proceedings against doctor accused of stocking medicines for sale

    SC quashes criminal proceedings against doctor accused of stocking medicines for sale

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed criminal proceedings against a doctor accused of stocking medicines for sale, saying the “extremely small” quantity of medicines which was seized can easily be found in the house or consultation room of a medical practitioner.

    The apex court observed that considering the small quantity of medicines, most of which were in the category of lotions and ointments, it cannot be said by any stretch of imagination that they could be stocked for sale.

    It noted that the appellant is a senior doctor who is engaged as an associate professor and head of the dermatology department in a government medical college in Chennai.

    “When small quantity of medicine has been found in the premises of a registered medical practitioner, it would not amount to selling their medicines across the counter in an open shop,” a bench of Justices Krishna Murari and Sudhanshu Dhulia said.

    The bench delivered its verdict on a plea filed by the doctor against a June 2022 order of the Madras High Court which had dismissed her petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings.

    The top court observed it is permissible for her under the law to practise medicine when she is not performing her official duties.

    It noted that the doctor, in her individual and independent capacity, was carrying on her medical practice at a premises in Chennai and an inspection was made there by the drugs inspector in March 2016.

    The bench further noted that as per the inspection report, the drugs inspector found some medicines like lotions and ointment in the inner room of her premises and he had also referred to certain sale bills of medicines.

    The bench noted the drugs inspector thereafter moved an application for obtaining sanction from the office of the Director of Drugs Control, Tamil Nadu, which was given in January 2018 and consequently, a complaint was filed before a court for prosecuting her under section 18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

    It said the prohibition under section 18(c) of the Act is on the manufacturing, distribution, stocking or exhibition of medicines for the purpose of sale.

    “The charge in the present case is that the appellant (doctor) had ‘stocked’ medicines for ‘sale’. The entire emphasis is on ‘sale’ of these medicines,” the bench noted.

    It said what the director of drugs control and the high court lost sight of is the fact that she is a registered medical practitioner and her area of specialisation being dermatology.

    “It is not a case that she had opened a shop in her premises from where she was selling drugs and cosmetics across the counter! It is possible that she was distributing these drugs to her patients for emergency uses and thus she is protected by the Act itself,” the apex court said.

    The bench observed it is not the case of the prosecution that she was selling drugs from an open shop across the counter.

    “But given the facts and circumstances of the case and considering that the appellant is a registered medical practitioner, along with the fact that the quantity of medicines which have been seized is extremely small, a quantity which can be easily found in the house or a consultation room of a doctor, in our considered view no offence is made out in the present case,” it said.

    The bench noted that the search was carried out in March 2016 and the sanction for prosecution was sought in September 2016.

    It said the sanction was given in January 2018 and there is no explanation given for this delay in getting the approval.

    “The sanction for prosecution given in the present case appears, prima facie, to suffer from the vice of non -application of mind. There is no reference to any of the documents, evidence or the submissions submitted by either of the parties, no reasons assigned or even an explanation pertaining to the delay which indicates it has been passed in a mechanical manner,” the bench said.

    While allowing the appeal, it set aside the order of the high court and quashed the criminal proceedings in the case.

    [ad_2]
    #quashes #criminal #proceedings #doctor #accused #stocking #medicines #sale

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Delhi HC stays proceedings in defamation case against journo by BJP’s Tajinder Bagga

    Delhi HC stays proceedings in defamation case against journo by BJP’s Tajinder Bagga

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday stayed the proceedings before the trial court in a defamation case lodged by Delhi BJP spokesperson Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga against journalist Swati Chaturvedi.

    Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar issued notice on the petition by Chaturvedi challenging the summons issued by the trial court to her on the defamation complaint and asked Bagga to file his response to the plea in two weeks.

    “Till then, trial proceedings are stayed,” said the judge.

    The counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that no case for defamation was made out from the material on record and the complainant has not even brought forth witnesses before the trial court to substantiate his claim that his reputation was lowered due to the actions of Chaturvedi.

    The defamation case arises from a tweet Chaturvedi allegedly posted in 2017 in which she claimed Bagga had not only beaten up a lawyer once but was also arrested in a sexual harassment matter.

    Bagga’s counsel had told the trial court that the tweet was made after he was appointed a BJP spokesperson.

    The counsel for the complainant defended the summoning order and said the petition lacked merit and the issue of lowering of reputation was a question of fact to be decided during the trial.

    It was also said that there is no necessity under the law to examine any witness on the issue of loss of reputation at this stage.

    The counsel, who opposed stay on trial court proceedings, also said the allegation pertaining to the sexual harassment case was absolutely incorrect and the matter relating to beating up a lawyer was sub-judice.

    The petitioner’s lawyer said Bagga himself acknowledged the incident where he beat up another lawyer and the victim of the sexual harassment case in question had also earlier tweeted about it.

    A magisterial court order had directed Chaturvedi to appear before it in the case filed by Bagga in May 2018.

    The matter will be heard next on July 18.

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #stays #proceedings #defamation #case #journo #BJPs #Tajinder #Bagga

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Thackeray group suggests disqualification proceedings against Shinde camp, SC declines

    Thackeray group suggests disqualification proceedings against Shinde camp, SC declines

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court Wednesday rejected the suggestion of the Uddhav Thackeray faction of the Shiv Sena to decide the disqualification proceedings pending against Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and MLAs belonging to his camp, saying it cannot assume the role of the Speaker as doing so will have “serious ramifications”.

    The Thackeray faction had on Tuesday insisted that the court decide the disqualification proceedings as that was the only way to “uphold the democratic spirit of the Constitution”.

    “Right or wrong, this is the system we have assumed as ‘We the People’. Can a court try to breach this system? Should the court enter into that area? This is an area which is worrying us,” the court observed on Wednesday.

    A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, which was hearing a batch of pleas related to the June 2022 Maharashtra political crisis, told senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the Uddhav Thackeray-led faction, that ultimately it is the Speaker of the House, who has to decide whether the rebellion by the Shinde bloc attracted the provisions of the anti-disqualification law.

    “You are saying whatever has to be done has to be done at the behest of the party. Your argument is that they (Maharashtra CM Eknath Shinde camp) have acted contrary to the interest of the party.

    “They have appointed their own whip and leader of the party and their behavior and conduct invited disqualification but all of this leads us to one area that it is the Speaker of the House who is to decide whether there is any disqualification or not. That’s an area we are unable to breach,” the court said.

    The five-judge bench, also comprising Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha, said it understood the arguments of Sibal that in parliamentary democracy, the political party is supreme.

    “So far so good. It’s a very significant point you (Sibal) have made that they (Shinde faction) are elected representatives of Shiv Sena party and their behavior must be dictated by the party. Now, the question is, should the court enter into the area of Speaker and, if it assumes the role of Speaker, then it will have very serious ramification.

    “Right or wrong, this is the system we have assumed as ‘We the People’. Now, will the court try and breach this system that is worrying us,” it said.

    Sibal, assisted by advocate Amit Anand Tiwari, said this court has held that illegality cannot be allowed to be continued even for a day.

    He said all these acts (by Shinde camp) were perpetuated by two orders of this court dated June 27, 2022 by which this court kept in abeyance their disqualification proceedings before the Deputy Speaker, and of June 29, 2022 by which the court refused to stay the direction of the Maharashtra governor to the 31-month-old Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government to take a floor test in the assembly to prove its majority.

    He submitted the top court should be worried because if this becomes a precedent, it can happen in other cases too.

    The bench said if such a situation arises because of a judicial order, then it is a duty of the court to rectify that situation.
    “Now, assuming that if we do so and place ourselves in a situation before June 27, 2022, then we would have said that let the Speaker decide and your argument would have been till the Speaker decided their disqualification, there should not be a trust vote.

    “It would be very difficult to retrace our steps back in this scenario as the question would arise which Speaker or that Speaker,” the bench said.

    Sibal said this was exactly what was done in the 2016 Nabam Rebia case, where the court set the clock back and ordered status quo ante by restoring the Arunachal Pradesh government.

    The bench said, “Mr. Sibal you want Nabam Rebia (judgement to be followed) when it suits you and you don’t want it when it does not suit you. Today, we have a Speaker in a democratically elected house and after that can we now say that let the then deputy speaker take a call on disqualification. Sorry, it will be very difficult to retrace our steps back.”

    Sibal submitted all these developments took place after the court order which allowed the status quo to be changed.

    The bench said those two orders were passed after hearing arguments from both the sides and that retracing the steps would mean invalidating the trust vote which took place subsequently.

    He said Parliament, in its wisdom, has used the term ‘Political Party’ under the provisions of Para 2(1)(b) of the Tenth Schedule, wherein a member attracts disqualification for going against the wishes or directions of the political party.
    “Democracy only thrives when the institutions uphold the sanctity of the Constitution. In this case, the governor did not stop them (Eknath Shinde faction) or chose not to stop them. He never asked them who you represent or which party you represent. Unless Nabam Rebia is overruled, these situations are bound to happen.

    “Governors are actively playing a role which is disturbing the polity of the state. I leave this court to find answers to these issues,” he said.

    The hearing remained inclusive and will continue on Thursday.

    On Tuesday, the top court had told the Uddhav Thackeray faction of the Shiv Sena that the Speaker of a House functions like a tribunal in matters related to defection under the anti-defection law.

    [ad_2]
    #Thackeray #group #suggests #disqualification #proceedings #Shinde #camp #declines

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • SC stays trial proceedings in UP against Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal

    SC stays trial proceedings in UP against Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday in an interim order stayed the trial proceedings against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a case registered against him in 2014 in Uttar Pradesh during the election campaign.

    A bench of Justices KM Joseph and BV Nagarathna stayed the trial proceedings and also issued notice on Kejriwal’s petition. The matter will be heard after five weeks.

    During the election campaign in 2014, Kejriwal had allegedly said that “those who believe in ‘Khuda’ won’t be pardoned by ‘Khuda’ if they vote for BJP”.

    Kejriwal approached the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court order which rejected his plea for discharge from the case.

    The High Court while dismissing Kejriwal’s plea had said, “It appeared that Kejriwal is threatening the voters in the name of ‘Khuda’ knowing fully well that if he uses the term ‘Khuda’, some set of voters belonging to different religions might have severely been influenced.”

    Earlier, Sultanpur Court had dismissed his discharge application.

    During the case hearing today, the bench expressed disapproval of the statement made by Kejriwal and said, “Why are you bringing God? In a secular country, leave God alone. God doesn’t need anyone’s protection, he can take care of himself.”

    Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing for Arvind Kejriwal said, “Sometimes during political campaigning, unintentional things are said.”

    “There are no allegations of any law and order problems or communal disharmony happening after the speech,” Singhvi added.

    Singhvi while urging that the proceedings against Kejriwal be stayed said, “Now that I am the Chief Minister, I will be called to UP every time. The discharge has been dismissed, the whole object is to call me and arrest me.”

    [ad_2]
    #stays #trial #proceedings #Delhi #Arvind #Kejriwal

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Cong MP Rajani Patil suspended for filming RS proceedings

    Cong MP Rajani Patil suspended for filming RS proceedings

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: In the first action against unruly MPs since Jagdeep Dhankhar took over as Chairman of Rajya Sabha, Congress MP Rajani Ashokrao Patil was on Friday suspended for the remainder of the Budget session for filming proceedings of the House.

    Right at the start of the day, Dhankhar expressed displeasure at MPs not following rules and indicated that action would be taken against those who filmed the ruckus that opposition parties had created during the reply by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the motion thanking the President for her address to Parliament.

    Later, Leader of the House and Union minister Piyush Goyal moved a motion seeking Patil’s suspension, after which the chairman asked the leaders of various political parties to air their views on the issue.

    While most opposition MPs stated that the Rajya Sabha TV was biased in covering the proceedings of the House, some like Manoj Jha of the RJD wanted a House committee to look into the conduct before any action is taken.

    In her defence, Rajani Patil said she was ready to be “rusticated” for not just this session but the entire year as she strongly felt that the BJP humiliates opposition MPs.

    “The way the discussion is taking place, I feel if a mistake has been committed by someone unknowingly, if you give such a big punishment by taking name…Someone who comes from the family of freedom fighters…has no right to stay here,” she added.

    “If you want, you can, for not just this session but for the rest of the sessions, rusticate me and I can even give resignation,” Patil said.

    Dhankhar said Patil “is suspended for the remaining period of the current session and till there is a report available for consideration of the House from the privileges committee, I put this motion for consideration of this House”.

    “Taking note of the sentiment of the House, it is hereby directed that all steps be taken that are applicable for a member who is under suspension and this will be effective during the remaining period of the current session, subject to a report being made available by the privileges committee for consideration of this House,” he said.

    Dhankhar said a suggestion had been made that an immediate investigation by outside agencies be undertaken but added that he has categorically ruled it out.

    “I said no, that idea does not occur to me…I said as chairman I will vindicate the trust of my electorate, we will deal with it in-house and not seek any outside assistance,” the chairman said.

    When Modi was replying to the motion of thanks on the President’s address on Thursday, opposition MPs had trooped into the Well of the House, shouting slogans all through the 90-minute speech as they felt the questions they had asked remained answered.

    Barring fleeting visuals of the opposition protest, Rajya Sabha TV, which is the only medium that provides visuals of House proceedings, maintained its focus on Modi, the treasury benches or the chair.

    Ranjeet Ranjan of the Congress alleged there was partiality against the opposition members in the coverage of the Upper House proceedings by Rajya Sabha TV. The issues raised by the opposition are not shown, she alleged.

    “There should be an enquiry as to whether such a video was made viral just to defame the opposition,” she said.

    While Congress MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi said rule 256 may not apply here and it requires a lot of investigation before the chairman considers any further action.

    “Obviously, there are factual matters, there would be some notice and response. There are no facts with anybody. The facts may be this way or that way,” he said.

    Ram Gopal Yadav of the Samajwadi Party said at times, it seems that the Upper House is functioning like a small village panchayat that can decide to punish someone any time.

    “Mountains are not going to fall. Similar incidents have happened several times earlier also. I pray to you not to take this incident seriously,” he said.

    While moving the motion, Piyush Goyal said, “An unfortunate incident has happened yesterday where it has been found that on social media, we are seeing a video recorded in this august House, in a very very unfortunate manner showing senior members of Parliament in poor light.”

    The video was unauthorisedly recorded by the member during the proceedings of the House which has been distributed through social media. It also shows members of the principal opposition in poor light, he said.

    Any such action done by any member to record and distribute on social media is of “serious concern” and members of Parliament have already complained to the chairman about this incident, Goyal pointed out.

    “This has brought disrepute to the entire august House and its members and the chair,” he said, adding that the incident happened despite several warnings given to all members even during the time of former chairman Venkaiah Naidu.

    Goyal further requested the Chairman “to name the member who was involved in this act” and emphasised that appropriate action should be taken befitting the regards for the chair and the rules of the House in this case.

    Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said the chair has the authority to decide the matter but urged it not to take decisions based on pressure from the treasury bench.

    He suggested that after an enquiry, if the individual was found guilty, she could be warned or made to understand instead of taking any harsh action.

    “First (there can be) enquiry, and then after enquiry, if the member is guilty, you can warn, if it is the first time, you can forgive, you can also warn….So, I request you not to pursue this matter further,” Kharge said.

    John Brittas of the CPI(M) said the coverage of House proceedings by Rajya Sabha TV was one-sided, and Santanu Sen of the TMC termed the official broadcaster partial.

    Jawhar Sircar (TMC) also called for ensuring a greater degree of fairness and education about parliamentary proceedings.

    [ad_2]
    #Cong #Rajani #Patil #suspended #filming #proceedings

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Parliament proceedings likely to witness disruptions over Adani issue for 2nd day

    Parliament proceedings likely to witness disruptions over Adani issue for 2nd day

    [ad_1]

    Delhi: Disruptions by Congress-led opposition are likely to stall proceedings of both houses of Parliament on Friday too, over the research firm Hindenburg’s allegations against Adani group.

    The opposition parties had stalled proceedings on Thursday over the issue and according to sources aware of developments, disruptions are likely to continue.

    Sources said that Congress and other major opportunity parties like the Trinamool Congress and DMK as well the Left parties are on the same page over launching vociferous protests against the government over the issue in both the houses today as well.

    On Thursday, Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge and other opposition parties sought an investigation into the allegations of fraud against one of India’s biggest conglomerates led either by Supreme Court or joint parliamentary committee.

    Kharge has also called a meeting of like-minded opposition parties to discuss strategy in Parliament.

    The Lok Sabha is expected to take up the motion of thanks on the President’s address, if proceedings are allowed to take off smoothly.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Parliament #proceedings #witness #disruptions #Adani #issue #2nd #day

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • MP: Woman with alleged PFI links held for recording court proceedings

    MP: Woman with alleged PFI links held for recording court proceedings

    [ad_1]

    Indore: Police have arrested a 30-year-old woman having alleged links with the banned outfit Popular Front of India (PFI) for filming the proceedings of a court during a hearing in Madhya Pradesh’s Indore district, an official said on Sunday.

    The woman, identified as Sonu Mansuri, later told the police that an advocate had asked her to make the video to be sent to the Islamic outfit PFI and she was given Rs three lakh for the work, Additional Commissioner of Police Rajesh Raghuvanshi told PTI.

    During the hearing of a case related to Bajrang Dal leader Tanu Sharma on Saturday, his advocates Amit Pandey and Sunil Vishwakarma noticed the woman shooting the video in court room no. 42 of Indore district court, he said.

    “The advocates got suspicious and with the help of women lawyers caught the woman. They then alerted the MG Road police who detained her on Saturday evening and formally arrested her at night,” he said.

    Mansuri, a resident of Indore, claimed before the police that senior advocate Noorjahan Khan had given her the task of making the video to be sent across to the PFI, the official said.

    The woman also told the police that she was given Rs three lakh for this work, the official said, adding the money has been recovered.

    “Further investigation is on and Sonu is being interrogated to extract more information about her link with the PFI. She will be produced in a court on Sunday afternoon,” Raghuvanshi said.

    Action will also be taken against advocate Noorjahan Khan if there is substantial evidence, he added.

    The Centre had in September 2022 banned the PFI and several of its associates for five years under a stringent anti-terror law, accusing them of having “links” with global terror groups like ISIS and trying to spread communal hatred in the country.

    Before the ban, the National Investigating Agency (NIA), the Enforcement Directorate(ED) and various state police forces had carried out raids in a massive pan-India crackdown on the PFI and arrested several of its leaders and activists from various states for allegedly supporting terror activities in the country.

    [ad_2]
    #Woman #alleged #PFI #links #held #recording #court #proceedings

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )