Tag: plea

  • SC reserves order on bail plea of Bhima Koregaon accused Vernon Gonsalves

    SC reserves order on bail plea of Bhima Koregaon accused Vernon Gonsalves

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday reserved an order on the bail pleas of Bhima Koregaon case accused Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira, lodged in jail since August 2018.

    A division bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Sudhanshu Dhulia reserved the order after both parties concluded the arguments.

    Gonsalves and Ferreira had approached the Supreme Court against an order by which the Bombay High Court denied them default bail, even as the same benefit was granted to another co-accused, Sudha Bharadwaj.

    In 2018 FIR was lodged in Pune in relation to certain offences in the Bhima Koregaon case.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #reserves #order #bail #plea #Bhima #Koregaon #accused #Vernon #Gonsalves

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Excise Policy Case: Manish Sisodia moves bail plea in trial court

    Excise Policy Case: Manish Sisodia moves bail plea in trial court

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Former Delhi Minister and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Manish Sisodia, who is presently in CBI remand, moved a regular bail petition in a trial court on Friday.

    Sisodia was recently arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for alleged irregularities in the framing and implementation of the excise policy of GNCTD.

    According to the lawyer concerned, hearing on the bail plea will be held on Saturday. Sisodia is also scheduled to be produced on Saturday at the end of his remand period granted on February 27, 2023.

    Rouse Avenue Court on Monday while sending Sisodia to CBI remand directed that the interrogation of the accused during the remand period shall be conducted at some place having CCTV coverage in accordance with guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court and the said footage shall be preserved by the CBI.

    Special Judge MK Nagpal on February 27, 2023, decided to send Manish Sisodia to CBI remand till March 4, 2023. Sisodia was arrested on Sunday in an ongoing investigation of a case related to alleged irregularities in the framing and implementation of the excise policy of GNCTD.

    The court said, keeping in view the facts and circumstances, the accused is being remanded to CBI custody for a period of five days i.e. till March 4, 2023, for his further and extensive interrogation.

    The court observed that the accused had joined the investigation of this case on two earlier occasions, but it has also been observed that he has failed to provide satisfactory answers to most of the questions put to him during his examination and interrogation conducted and has thus, failed to legitimately explain the incriminating evidence which has allegedly surfaced against him in the investigation conducted so far.

    It is true that he cannot be expected to make self-incriminating statements, but the interests of justice and of a fair investigation require that he should come up with some legitimate answers to the questions which are being put to him by the Investigation officer.

    Some of his subordinates are found to have disclosed certain facts which can be taken as incriminating against him and some documentary evidence against him has also already surfaced a proper and fair investigation requires that some genuine and legitimate answers to the questions being put to him about the same are to be found and hence, in considered opinion of this court, this can only be done during custodial interrogation of the accused, noted the court.

    During arguments, CBI counsel told the court that the Delhi Deputy CM’s custodial interrogation is required for an effective investigation into the case. While seeking five days’ remand of Sisodia, CBI said, “Conspiracy was hatched in a very planned and secret manner.”
    Meanwhile, senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan appeared for Sisodia and opposed the remand application of CBI.

    “If someone is not willing to say something, that cannot be a ground for arrest,” argued Sisodia’s lawyer.

    “What should I do with a phone that I changed? I am a minister, I cannot send it to a second-hand shop, it would have important data. CBI confronted me with the material but I did not confess. The remand application says I gave evasive replies. This cannot be a ground for remand. They search my residence on August 19, 2022. I hand over my phone. They called me to join the investigation and I joined. I cooperated,” Advocate Dayan Krishnan argued for Delhi Deputy CM.

    The CBI on Sunday released a statement on Sisodia’s arrests, claiming he was giving evasive replies and wasn’t cooperating in the ongoing investigation of the liquor scam case.

    [ad_2]
    #Excise #Policy #Case #Manish #Sisodia #moves #bail #plea #trial #court

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • HC quashes special court’s ‘cryptic’ order rejecting Navlakha’s bail plea

    HC quashes special court’s ‘cryptic’ order rejecting Navlakha’s bail plea

    [ad_1]

    Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Thursday quashed a “cryptic” order of a special court rejecting bail to activist Gautam Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, and directed the special judge to rehear his bail plea.

    A division bench of Justices A S Gadkari and P D Naik noted that the special court’s order did not contain an analysis of the evidence relied upon by the prosecution, as it directed the special judge to conclude the fresh hearing within 4 weeks.

    The 70-year-old social activist had moved HC challenging the September 5, 2022 order under the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act refusing him bail on merits.

    The high court briefly heard the arguments put forth by Navlakha’s counsel Yug Chaudhary this week but opined that the reasoning in the order of the special court was “cryptic” and said it didn’t get the benefit of a reasoned order.

    “No reason of whatever nature is given. Trial court has not given reasoning as required under section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) while rejecting bail,” the bench said on Thursday.

    The HC said the bail plea requires a fresh hearing by the special court and sent it back to the latter.

    “The special judge is requested to conclude within 4 weeks without being influenced from September 5 order and this order of today. It is made clear that this court has not made any opinion on merits,” HC said.

    Navlakha was arrested in August 2018 but was initially placed under house arrest.

    He was later moved to the Taloja Central Prison near Mumbai in April 2020 after a Supreme Court order.

    However, on November 10 last year, the Supreme Court allowed his plea to be shifted back to house arrest for a month. This was extended by another month on December 13.

    He is presently residing in Navi Mumbai in Maharashtra’s Thane district.

    The NIA opposed Navlakha’s bail plea by claiming that he had been introduced to a Pakistan Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) General for his “recruitment”. This shows his “nexus” with the spy organisation, said the federal agency.

    The case relates to alleged inflammatory speeches made at the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017 which the police claim triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial on the outskirts of the western Maharashtra city.

    [ad_2]
    #quashes #special #courts #cryptic #order #rejecting #Navlakhas #bail #plea

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Delhi HC issues notice on plea seeking cow protection cell

    Delhi HC issues notice on plea seeking cow protection cell

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday issued notice on a plea seeking a separate cell for cow protection in every district and to put a stop to its slaughtering.

    Filed in a form of Public Interest Litigation (PIL), a division bench Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad while hearing it, sought response of the Centre, Arvind Kekriwal-led Government and Police.

    The bench has listed the matter for the next hearing on May 17.

    Ajay Gautam’s PIL alleges that there have been rampant incidents of cow slaughtering in Delhi despite a large number of policemen here.

    Appearing for Centre, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Chetan Sharma said that it is a “genuine case.”

    It is the petitioner’s case that people from Mewat or Nuhu district in Haryana, kidnap cows from the roads, farms or dairies in the capital and take them for slaugtering.

    “These places are infamous for cow slaughters,” it says.

    The petitioner has shown displeasure stating that witnessing incidents of ill-treatment and torture to cows becomes intolerable for people who reveres cow as “his mother”.

    “Sometimes situation goes out of control,” the plea adds.

    “In many cases, Gau Saveks raided the crime site before the police and resulted in conflict/clash reported between cow smugglers and cow saveks.. That Impounding of vehicles transporting cow meat is a very common occurrence. It is submitted that due to above reasons/incidents communal tension also increase and resulted in communal harmony disturb,” the plea states.

    According to the Delhi police Act, 1978, the Police is empowered to make special cell or unit for the protection of cows to avoid conflict between cow smugglers and cow sewaka, the petition reads.

    “Cows are the goddesses of the gods and the refuge of all auspiciousness. Cows bestow every kind of happiness and for this reason they always are worshipable. Cows are the support of all the worlds for by their milk they nourish terrestrial beings and by their ghee offered in the sacrifice they nourish the denizens of the celestial realms. Nothing superior to cows,” the plea states.

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #issues #notice #plea #seeking #cow #protection #cell

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • AI urination incident: DGCA rejects plea to revoke suspension of pilot’s licence

    AI urination incident: DGCA rejects plea to revoke suspension of pilot’s licence

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Aviation regulator DGCA has rejected the plea to revoke the suspension of the licence of an Air India pilot in connection with the urination incident onboard New York-Delhi flight in November last year, according to a source.

    The licence of the pilot was suspended for three months by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) on January 20.

    A joint forum of six unions had also appealed to the regulator to revoke the suspension of the pilot’s licence.

    On Wednesday, the source said the appeal of the pilot to revoke the licence suspension has been rejected.

    In connection with the urination incident that happened onboard the Air India flight on November 26, 2022, the regulator had suspended the licence of the pilot for three months, imposed a penalty of Rs 30 lakh on the airline and Rs 3 lakh on the director of the carrier’s in-flight services.

    The enforcement action was taken by the DGCA citing various lapses in reporting about the incident, which came to the regulator’s notice only on January 4.

    On January 24, the forum said that while there is a groundswell of “public pressure” for action, given the serious nature of the allegations of the complainant, there is a need to evaluate the same with the nature of the Pilot-In-Command’s duties and responsibilities, among others and to evaluate the facts that came up before the pilots and crew on the said flight.

    Citing various aspects, the forum had asked the regulator to “withdraw the harsh punishment and suspension of the PIC”.

    The six unions represented by the forum are Indian Pilots Guild, Indian Commercial Pilots Association, Air Corporation Employees Union, Air India Employees Union, All India Cabin Crew Association and Airline Pilots Association of India.

    [ad_2]
    #urination #incident #DGCA #rejects #plea #revoke #suspension #pilots #licence

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • AI urination incident: DGCA rejects plea to revoke suspension of pilot’s licence

    AI urination incident: DGCA rejects plea to revoke suspension of pilot’s licence

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Aviation regulator DGCA has rejected the plea to revoke the suspension of the licence of an Air India pilot in connection with the urination incident onboard New York-Delhi flight in November last year, according to a source.

    The licence of the pilot was suspended for three months by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) on January 20.

    A joint forum of six unions had also appealed to the regulator to revoke the suspension of the pilot’s licence.

    On Wednesday, the source said the appeal of the pilot to revoke the licence suspension has been rejected.

    In connection with the urination incident that happened onboard the Air India flight on November 26, 2022, the regulator had suspended the licence of the pilot for three months, imposed a penalty of Rs 30 lakh on the airline and Rs 3 lakh on the director of the carrier’s in-flight services.

    The enforcement action was taken by the DGCA citing various lapses in reporting about the incident, which came to the regulator’s notice only on January 4.

    On January 24, the forum said that while there is a groundswell of “public pressure” for action, given the serious nature of the allegations of the complainant, there is a need to evaluate the same with the nature of the Pilot-In-Command’s duties and responsibilities, among others and to evaluate the facts that came up before the pilots and crew on the said flight.

    Citing various aspects, the forum had asked the regulator to “withdraw the harsh punishment and suspension of the PIC”.

    The six unions represented by the forum are Indian Pilots Guild, Indian Commercial Pilots Association, Air Corporation Employees Union, Air India Employees Union, All India Cabin Crew Association and Airline Pilots Association of India.

    [ad_2]
    #urination #incident #DGCA #rejects #plea #revoke #suspension #pilots #licence

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Excise policy case: Delhi court defers passing order on Hyderabad-based auditor’s bail plea

    Excise policy case: Delhi court defers passing order on Hyderabad-based auditor’s bail plea

    [ad_1]

    Delhi: A Delhi court has deferred passing of order on Thursday on the bail plea filed by Hyderabad-based CA Butchi Babu Gorantla, recently arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the liquor policy case.

    The Special Judge M. K. Nagpal of the Rouse Avenue Courts, on February 24, had reserved his order after hearing arguments in Gorantla’s bail plea from both sides and had listed it for hearing on Wednesday.

    Gorantla, who is the former auditor of Telangana Chief Minister K. Chandrashekar Rao’s daughter MLC K. Kavitha whose name has already been dragged into the case, was arrested by the CBI in the excise policy case on February 8.

    According to the CBI, he was arrested for his alleged role in formulating and implementing the Delhi Excise Policy and causing wrongful gain to Hyderabad-based wholesale and retail licensees and their beneficial owners.

    Recently, the court had also given permission to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to question Gorantla in judicial custody after the agency moved an application seeking permission to quiz him and to record his statement in the money laundering case pertaining to the Excise Policy.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Excise #policy #case #Delhi #court #defers #passing #order #Hyderabadbased #auditors #bail #plea

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • SC to hear plea of Tamil Nadu against HC order permitting RSS to take out march

    SC to hear plea of Tamil Nadu against HC order permitting RSS to take out march

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court Wednesday agreed to hear on March 3 an appeal of the Tamil Nadu government against the Madras High Court order permitting the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) to take out a march in the state.

    A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha took note of the submissions of senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the state government, that the plea needed an urgent hearing as the march is scheduled to commence from March 5.

    “I am asking for a Friday hearing,” the senior lawyer said.

    “We will keep it on Friday,” the bench said.

    Rohatgi said the state had refused permission to hold a march on roads in six districts keeping in mind the presence of PFI (Popular Front of India) and the law and order.

    The organisation was allowed to hold its function at closed spaces like stadiums in six districts but not a march on streets, he said, adding the single judge bench of the high court had agreed with the state’s decision.

    However, a division bench of the high court, on February 10, permitted the RSS to take out its route march in Tamil Nadu on rescheduled dates, and observed that protests are essential for a healthy democracy, the senior lawyer said.

    As the march is proposed to begin from March 5, the matter needed consideration before that, he said.

    Earlier, the state government had moved the top court against the permission granted to RSS to take out its route march on rescheduled dates.

    The state government, in its plea before the top court, said the route march would pose a law and order problem and sought a stay on the high court order.

    Setting aside the order passed on November 4, 2022 by a single judge that had imposed conditions on the proposed state-wide route march asking the RSS to hold the march indoors or in enclosed space, the larger division bench court had restored the order dated September 22, 2022, which directed the Tamil Nadu police to consider the RSS’ representation seeking permission to conduct the march and a public meeting, as well, and to grant permission for the same.

    Accordingly, it had directed the appellants to approach the state authorities with three different dates of their choice for the purpose of holding the route march/peaceful procession and the state authorities were directed to grant permission to them on one of the chosen dates out of the three.

    Also, the RSS was asked to ensure strict discipline and make sure there is no provocation or incitement on their part during the march. The state, on its part, should take adequate safety measures and make traffic arrangements to ensure the procession and the meeting are held peacefully, the high court had said.

    Challenging the single judge order, the RSS sought a direction to the authorities to permit their members to conduct the procession wearing their uniform through various routes throughout the state.

    The organisation had earlier sought permission for the route march to commemorate the 75th year of Independence, the birth centenary of Bharat Ratna B R Ambedkar and Vijayadasami festival, on October 2, 2022, at various places and to also conduct a public meeting on the same day.

    [ad_2]
    #hear #plea #Tamil #Nadu #order #permitting #RSS #march

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Delhi HC adjourns hearing on Asiya Andrabi’s plea against property seizure

    Delhi HC adjourns hearing on Asiya Andrabi’s plea against property seizure

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday adjourned hearing on the pleas by two Kashmiri separatists Sofi Fehmeeda and Asiya Andrabi against National Investigation Agency (NIA) for seizure of their car and house in Jammu and Srinagar cities, respectively.

    On the request of the counsel for appellants, the court adjourned the matter for April 26.

    Last year, the agency had opposed the appeal moved by Andrabi and others, saying it was established that premises have been used by the Dukhtaran-e-Millat (DeM)for holding meetings to commit unlawful activities and terrorist activities.

    Andrabi is the chief of banned terrorist outfit DeM, which advocates violent secession of Jammu and Kashmir from India.

    In 2019, the NIA issued attachments orders for the seizure of Andrabi’s house and her associate Fehmeeda’s car, alleging that these properties were proceeds of terrorism and were used to further terrorist activities.

    Andrabi has been charged with violating the provisions of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).

    On directions of the Union Home Ministry, the NIA registered a case against them and the organisation.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #adjourns #hearing #Asiya #Andrabis #plea #property #seizure

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Delhi HC seeks Centre’s reply on journalist Angad Singh’s plea

    Delhi HC seeks Centre’s reply on journalist Angad Singh’s plea

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday asked the Central government to file a proper counter affidavit to a Vice News journalist Angad Singh’s plea challenging his deportation from Delhi to New York in August last year and being “blacklisted” despite being an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card holder.

    Appearing for the Centre, advocate Anurag Ahluwalia had last month told the court that as the US-based journalist has violated Section 11A of the Foreigners Order, 1948, which prohibits a foreigner from producing any picture, film or documentary without permission in writing from the Centre, he is a blacklisted subject.

    During the hearing on Tuesday, appearing for Singh, Advocate Swathi Sukumar said that she had moved an amendment application against the blacklisting which was mentioned in the counter affidavit of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA).

    The FRRO, in an affidavit, told the court that Singh was blacklisted at the instance of the Consulate General of India in New York.

    According to the affidavit, Singh had allegedly depicted India in a negative manner in the “India Burning” documentary.

    Ahluwalia had earlier submitted that Singh was entering India on his journalist visa for a personal visit but he wasn’t issued a visa for that.

    On Tuesday, Sukumar further said that she did not have a copy of the blacklisting order.

    Ahluwalia said that he would file a “detailed response”. He added that the primary condition was that Singh comes to the place, makes a video, gives it to the consulate general for approval, once approved, then the video could have been made public.

    Sukumar argued that the Centre had to seek instructions on whether any proceedings were initiated for cancellation of Singh’s OCI card.

    To this, Ahluwalia said that they have not initiated any proceedings as of now and added that filing the blacklisting order may not be necessary.

    While allowing the amendment to the writ petition and directing the Centre to file a proper counter affidavit to the amended petition, the court noted: “It is submitted by the Centre that their stand would be stated in the counter affidavit which is now to be filed in the amended writ.”

    The court listed the matter for the next hearing in May.

    Singh has covered important issues in his documentaries, including the Shaheen Bagh protests, the farmers’ protests and the Covid-19 pandemic in India, among others.

    In his plea, Singh has mentioned that his fundamental right under the Citizenship Act, 1955, is being violated by not letting him into India.

    Earlier, Singh’s counsel had sought a declaration that his deportation from the government was illegal and disclosure of all the materials and data available with the government related to him.

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #seeks #Centres #reply #journalist #Angad #Singhs #plea

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )