Tag: PIL

  • Delhi HC rejects PIL against appointment of MP-IDSA chief

    Delhi HC rejects PIL against appointment of MP-IDSA chief

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Friday rejected a plea against Sujan R. Chinoy’s appointment as the Director General of Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA) in January 2019.

    A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Subramonium Prasad was hearing lawyer petitioner Subhash Chandran K.R.’s Public Interest Litigation (PIL) contending that it concerns a prominent post in defence for which no advertisement was published.

    The bench said that since it relates to a service matter, it cannot be maintained and no case for interference can be made out.

    “In the considered opinion of this court, as the present PIL is in relation to a service matter, no case is made out for interference in the matter. Admission is declined,” it said.

    Solicitor General Tushar Mehta has said that this appointment is made by a committee consisting of the Cabinet Secretary, the Defence Secretary, and two persons of eminence and the “petitioner has no connection. He is a stranger”.

    Noting that there is no advertisement for a lot of high offices, the bench dismissed the PIL.

    The PIL claimed that the institute did not obey to the rules for a public appointment which was “an act of lawlessness cutting at the very root of the strict mandate of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution”.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #rejects #PIL #appointment #MPIDSA #chief

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Telangana HC to hear PIL against issuing pattas to encroachers

    Telangana HC to hear PIL against issuing pattas to encroachers

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: Forum for Good Governance (FGG), a non-profit organisation has moved the Telangana High Court against the decision of the Tribal Welfare Department to issue pattas to encroachers.

    The principal secretary of the Tribal Welfare Department issued an impugned memo dated November 5, 2021, to undertake a special drive to give pattas to illegal, ineligible, and non-existing encroachers of Reserve Forests to the extent of 11.5 lakh acres.

    Following the issuance of the memo, FGG Secretary M Padmanabha Reddy filed a PIL urging the court to order the defendants not to distribute patta certificates while the PIL was pending and to stay the contested memo issued on November 5, 2021.

    The FGG named the state government represented by its chief secretary (GAD), the Union of India, the secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, the special chief secretary, Environment, Forest, Science and Technology department, the principal secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, the commissioner of Tribal Welfare, the principal chief conservator of Forests, and the secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change.

    The PIL will likely be listed before the CJ bench in a day or two.

    [ad_2]
    #Telangana #hear #PIL #issuing #pattas #encroachers

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • PIL in SC seeks framing of rules for live-in relationships; mentions Shraddha Walkar’s killing

    PIL in SC seeks framing of rules for live-in relationships; mentions Shraddha Walkar’s killing

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A PIL was filed in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to the Centre to frame rules for registration of live-in relationships as it cited increase in crimes like rape and murder allegedly committed by live-in partners.

    The plea, which referred to the recent killing of Shraddha Walkar allegedly by her live-in partner Aaftab Amin Poonawala, also sought framing of rules and guidelines for registration of such relationships.

    The PIL said registration of live-in relationship would lead to accurate information being available to both the live-in partners about each other and also to the government about each of them regarding their marital status, their criminal history and other relevant details.

    Besides the increase in crimes like rape and murder, the plea, filed by lawyer Mamta Rani, said there has been a “huge increase in the false rape cases being filed by the women wherein the women claims to be living in live-in relationships with the accused and it is always difficult for the courts to find out from the evidence whether the fact of living in live-in relationship is proved by the backing of evidence”.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #PIL #seeks #framing #rules #livein #relationships #mentions #Shraddha #Walkars #killing

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • SC demands accountability while hearing PIL to debar those facing charges from polls

    SC demands accountability while hearing PIL to debar those facing charges from polls

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday observed that there must be accountability at every level and citing government offices, stressed that a common man is bogged down by corruption, while giving the Centre the final opportunity to file its reply to a PIL for debarring those persons facing trial for serious offences from contesting polls.

    A bench of Justices K.M. Joseph and B.V. Nagarathna emphasised that the issue raised in the PIL by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay is an “important matter” and there must be accountability at all levels.

    Upadhyay submitted that today, there is a situation where a peon without any decent education can become a minister and “we are celebrating 75 years of independence, but a person with kidnapping and extortion charges can get elected in polls…”

    Justice Joseph said: “If we have to truly become a nation we strive to, we have to come back to our values. A common man is bogged down by corruption.”

    He added that if one were to go to any government office, can that person come out unscathed? Justice Joseph also said jurist Nani Palkhiwala’s lecture ‘We the people’ speaks about this.

    “We have to start at the beginning to retain that character, without that there is no use.” Justice Nagarathna added: “There must be accountability at every level.”

    Upadhyay said he had filed a PIL to link property with Aadhaar and the day property is linked with Aadhaar, it will play an important role to weed out corruption.

    “We in India don’t need Rs 500 or Rs 2,000 notes as most people have credit card, and debit cards. There needs to be notebandi (note ban) and not notebadli (not exchange)”, added Upadhyay.

    The bench orally observed: “You have to get back to your values and if you have that then you have a nation… We need teachers who should be builders of nation… We also have to become humble, to begin with that values are more important.”

    After hearing arguments, the top court scheduled the matter for final hearing on April 10.

    During the hearing, Centre’s counsel said it would file its response in the matter, though the issue has been covered in previous judgments. The Election Commission contended that it has raised the concern about criminalisation of politics and the issue falls under the domain of the Parliament.

    In September last year, the top court had issued notice to the Ministries of Law and Justice and Home, and also the Election Commission on the PIL to debar all those persons, against whom charges have been framed, from contesting election in accordance with the recommendations of the Law Commission’s 244th report.

    The petitioner raised concern about an increase in the number of candidates who declared criminal cases against them. Out of 539 winners of 17th Lok Sabha, 233 (43 per cent) declared criminal cases against themselves. After the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, 185 (34 per cent) winners had declared criminal cases.

    [ad_2]
    #demands #accountability #hearing #PIL #debar #facing #charges #polls

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • SC refuses to entertain PIL seeking menstrual pain leave for female students, working women

    SC refuses to entertain PIL seeking menstrual pain leave for female students, working women

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court Friday refused to entertain a PIL seeking a direction to all the states to frame rules for menstrual pain leave for female students and working women at their respective workplaces, observing that the issue falls under the policy domain of the government,

    A bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud disposed of the petition and granted liberty to the PIL petitioner to approach the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development with a representation seeking a policy decision on the issue.

    “This is a policy matter so we are not dealing with this…Having regard to the policy views, it would be appropriate if the petitioner approaches the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development. The petition is accordingly disposed of,” said the bench which also comprised justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala.

    During the brief hearing, the bench took note of the submissions of a law student, opposing the PIL, that if employers are compelled to grant menstrual pain leaves to women employees every month then it may dis-incentivise them from hiring them.

    The court, however, said though the plea had raised some important points, but the issue being a policy related, it cannot entertain this.

    The petition, filed by Delhi resident Shailendra Mani Tripathi through lawyer Vishal Tiwari, had sought a direction to the Centre and all the states for compliance of section 14 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961.

    Section 14 of the Act deals with appointment of inspectors and says appropriate governments may appoint such officers and may define the local limits of jurisdiction within which they shall exercise their functions under this law.

    Earlier on February 15, the top court had agreed to hear the PIL.

    The plea had said countries like the United Kingdom, China, Wales, Japan, Taiwan, Indonesia, South Korea, Spain and Zambia are already providing menstrual pain leave in one form or the other.

    It had said only women are empowered to propagate the human race with their special ability of creation and during different stages of maternity, she undergoes a number of physical and mental hardships, be it menstruation, pregnancy, miscarriage or any other related medical complications.

    The had plea said the 1961 Act makes provisions for almost all the problems faced by women that can be understood by several of its provisions which have made it mandatory for employers to grant paid leave to women employees for certain number of days during pregnancy, in case of miscarriage, for tubectomy operation and also in cases of medical complications arising out of these stages of maternity.

    “Ironically, the most disappointing aspect in the direction of respecting the rights of working women, is that in spite of a provision under section 14 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, that there will be an inspector for a particular area to monitor the implementation of such great provisions, no government in India has created the post of inspectors, forget about the appointment of such inspectors,” the plea had claimed.

    It had said the provisions of law under the 1961 Act are one of the “greatest steps” taken by Parliament to recognise and respect motherhood and maternity of working women.

    “Definitely even today also, in several organisations, including government organisations, these provisions are not being implemented in their true spirit and with the same legislative intent with which it was enacted but at the same time one of the biggest aspects of this whole issue or one of the very basic problems related to maternity which are faced by every woman has been completely ignored by the legislature in this very good law and also by the executive while making rules, specifically the leave rules,” the petition had said.

    It said the central civil services (CCS) leave rules have made provisions like child care leave for women for a period of 730 days during her entire service period to take care of her first two children till they attain the age of 18 years.

    The plea had said this rule has also given 15 days of paternity leave to male employees to take care of a child which is another great step of a welfare state in recognising the rights and problems of working women.

    “In spite of making all the above mentioned provisions in law to take care of women in difficult stages of her maternity, the very first stage of the maternity, the menstrual period, has been knowingly or unknowingly ignored by society, the legislature and other stakeholders in society except few organisations and state governments,” it had alleged.

    The plea had said Bihar is the only state which has been providing two days of special menstrual pain leave to women since 1992.

    It said there are some Indian companies that offer paid period leaves which include Zomato, Byju’s and Swiggy.

    [ad_2]
    #refuses #entertain #PIL #seeking #menstrual #pain #leave #female #students #working #women

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Telangana HC takes up suo motu PIL on stray dogs mauling boy to death

    Telangana HC takes up suo motu PIL on stray dogs mauling boy to death

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court on Wednesday initiated a suo motu public interest litigation over the gruesome incident of a pack of stray dogs attacking and killing a 4-year-old boy at Amberpet in the city on February 19.

    The High Court took cognisance of a newspaper report on the incident and took it up as the suo motu public interest litigation (PIL).

    A bench comprising Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan will hear the PIL on Thursday.

    The court has made Chief Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department Principal Secretary, GHMC Commissioner, GHMC Deputy Commissioner (Amberpet), GHMC Veterinary Officer, Hyderabad District Collector and Member Secretary of Telangana State Legal Services Authority as respondents in the PIL.

    The child was apparently carrying a packet containing some food item when the dogs pounced on him and killed him. The incident was caught on CCTV camera and the footage went viral on Tuesday provoking public outcry.

    In the video clip, the canines were seen suddenly attacking the boy while tailing him, following which he fell down. He was walking alone. The unrelenting pack of strays kept mauling him even as there was nobody in sight who could come to his rescue.

    The boy’s father, who works as a security guard at a car service centre, had taken him and his 6-year-old daughter to his workplace located in the area.

    The victim suffered serious injuries in the attack and was rushed to the hospital by his father and others where he was declared brought dead, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) officials had said.

    [ad_2]
    #Telangana #takes #suo #motu #PIL #stray #dogs #mauling #boy #death

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Delhi HC notice to Centre on PIL against compulsory reporting of POCSO cases

    Delhi HC notice to Centre on PIL against compulsory reporting of POCSO cases

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday asked the Centre to file its reply, within six weeks, on a PIL challenging provisions of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, 2012, requiring compulsory reporting of sexual offences against minors.

    A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad, dealing with lawyer Harsh Vibhore Singhal’s matter, issued notice on the petition and listed the case for pleadings to be complete before the Joint Registrar in July.

    Singhal has sought “judicial invalidation” of various sections of the POCSO Act, as these violate minors’ right to give informed consent for not reporting the matter and are against Article 21 of the Constitution.

    “… the law is well settled that neither law, nor police nor any court can force a sexual assault survivor to report an offence by filing an FIR and no police or court can force any minor in consensual sex to report her sexual activity. Thus, the impugned sections requiring mandatory reporting are untenable, arbitrary and unconstitutional and deserve to be set aside,” the petition contends.

    The petitioner argued that these provisions deprive minors and grown-up women of seeking prenatal, reproductive, and sexual healthcare.

    “…consensual sexual acts by under 18 minors fall squarely within the penumbra of the right to privacy which has also been recognised by a nine-judge SC bench in Puttaswamy v. Union of India”, the petitioner stated.

    The bench was urged by Singhal to declare the challenged provisions “unconstitutional”.

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #notice #Centre #PIL #compulsory #reporting #POCSO #cases

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • SC seeks Centre’s reply on PIL alleging ‘unnecessary’ hysterectomies in Bihar, Raj, Chhattisgarh

    SC seeks Centre’s reply on PIL alleging ‘unnecessary’ hysterectomies in Bihar, Raj, Chhattisgarh

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court sought the Centre’s response on Monday on a PIL alleging that doctors in Bihar, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh have been performing “unnecessary hysterectomies”, a surgical procedure to remove the uterus, on poor women just to reap high insurance fees from governments under the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY).

    A bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also sought the assistance of Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati to deal with the public interest litigation (PIL) matter filed by Narendra Gupta, himself a medical practitioner.

    The bench, also comprising Justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala, granted four weeks’ time to the Centre for filing its response to the PIL.

    A hysterectomy is a surgical procedure to remove the uterus after which a woman can neither conceive nor can have menstrual periods regardless of her age.

    The PIL, based on media reports and researched facts, alleged a “widespread pattern of doctors performing medically unnecessary hysterectomies to reap high insurance fees from the government” in states such as Bihar, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh.

    It sought compensation for the victim women and meaningful policy changes to deal with the problem.

    The women, aided by heavily-subsidised state-funded health insurance schemes, usually go to private hospitals for medical care for symptoms such as “abdominal pain and general weakness” and doctors resort to “unnecessary hysterectomy operations after cursory, or in some cases, no medical examinations”, the petition alleged.

    “The present petition has been filed in the nature of public interest litigation…and arises from an influx of news stories and Right to Information (RTI) results in the states of Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan regarding unlawful hysterectomies and related insurance scams,” it said.

    The petition sought directions to the state governments “to implement monitoring, inspection and accountability mechanisms for the private healthcare industry”, which are empanelled to serve the poor covered under the government’s Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY).

    The RSBY has been launched by the Union Ministry of Labour and Employment to provide a health insurance coverage to Below Poverty Line (BPL) families.

    The objective of the scheme is to provide protection to BPL households from financial liabilities arising out of health shocks that involve hospitalisation.

    [ad_2]
    #seeks #Centres #reply #PIL #alleging #unnecessary #hysterectomies #Bihar #Raj #Chhattisgarh

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Adani-Hindenburg row: SC agrees to hear fresh PIL of Congress leader on Feb 17

    Adani-Hindenburg row: SC agrees to hear fresh PIL of Congress leader on Feb 17

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to hear on February 17 a fresh plea of a Congress leader seeking investigation under the supervision of a sitting apex court judge against the Adani Group of companies in light of the allegations made by the US-based Hindenburg Research.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha took note of the submissions of a lawyer, representing Congress leader Jaya Thakur, that the plea needed an urgent hearing.

    The bench initially agreed to list the PIL for hearing on February 24 and later decided to hear on Friday after the lawyer pointed out that two other PILs are listed on February 17.

    Thakur has also sought a direction for investigating the role of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and the State Bank of India (SBI) in investing huge amounts of public money in Adani Enterprises.

    On Monday, the Centre had agreed to the apex court’s proposal to set up a panel of experts to look into strengthening the regulatory mechanisms for the stock market following the recent Adani group shares crash triggered by Hindenburg Research’s fraud allegations.

    The top court seized two petitions alleging exploitation of innocent investors and “artificial crashing” of the Adani Group’s stock value.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #AdaniHindenburg #row #agrees #hear #fresh #PIL #Congress #leader #Feb

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Land for power lines: HC asks rights body to serve PIL copy to Adani firm

    Land for power lines: HC asks rights body to serve PIL copy to Adani firm

    [ad_1]

    Kolkata: The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday asked APDR to serve a copy of its public interest litigation (PIL) to Adani Power Ltd, where the rights body alleged that power transmission towers of the company in West Bengal’s Farakka were constructed without paying due compensation for land.

    The lawyer for Adani Power, who was present in the court, claimed that the project’s work for setting up the transmission lines for the export of electricity from its plant at Godda in Jharkhand to Bangladesh started in 2018.

    Anuj Singh, the lawyer for the company, submitted before the court that it has not yet received a copy of the petition from APDR (Association for Protection of Democratic Rights).

    A division bench comprising Chief Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Justice R Bharadwaj directed the petitioner to serve a copy of the petition to the company and fixed February 20 for the hearing of the case.

    The petitioner’s lawyer claimed that around 35 owners of mango and lychee orchards suffered loss of livelihoods owing to the setting up of the towers, alleging that they have not been given compensation for the land taken from them for the purpose.

    They also alleged that many mango and lychee trees were felled but the owners were not compensated for that as well.

    The company’s lawyer claimed that the compensation offered was disputed and refused by the land owners and as such, they should have approached the district magistrate of Murshidabad, where Farakka is located, for adjudication.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Land #power #lines #asks #rights #body #serve #PIL #copy #Adani #firm

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )