Tag: path

  • ‘Chieftains of communal votes’ biggest barriers on path of inclusive empowerment: Naqvi

    ‘Chieftains of communal votes’ biggest barriers on path of inclusive empowerment: Naqvi

    [ad_1]

    Aligarh: Hitting out at Opposition parties, senior BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi on Monday said the “chieftains of communal votes” are the biggest barriers on the path of inclusive empowerment and Muslims must not allow their votes to be taken for granted.

    He urged Muslim voters to get rid of “political pollution” being spread by the “conspiracy syndicate”, saying this was a must for the community to avoid the treatment of taken for granted.

    Naqvi, while interacting with senior professors of the Aligarh Muslim University, prominent people and the media during election campaigning for the May 11 local body polls in Aligarh, said some people treat Muslim votes as their “parental property”.

    MS Education Academy

    “The attitude that ‘if Muslims will not vote for us, where else will they go’ had made the community their preferred political destination for deception,” Naqvi was quoted as saying by a statement from his office.

    There is a need to defeat exploitation politics to ensure the community’s betterment and empowerment, the former Union minister said.

    The “chieftains of communal votes” are the biggest barriers on the path of inclusive empowerment, the former minority affairs minister said.

    “When the Modi-Yogi governments (Centre and Uttar Pradesh) and the BJP have not done any discrimination against any community in terms of development, then why should any community show stinginess towards the BJP while voting? Development with dignity and empowerment without appeasement is our mantra,” Naqvi said.

    It is high time that the Muslim community comes out from the “trap of traders of votes” and bridge the gap between them and the BJP, he said.

    “The BJP has reached out to you by taking four steps forward towards the community and now it is your turn to take two steps forward towards the BJP,” he added.

    [ad_2]
    #Chieftains #communal #votes #biggest #barriers #path #inclusive #empowerment #Naqvi

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • BJP taking country on path of progress: Yogi Adityanath in poll-bound Karnataka

    BJP taking country on path of progress: Yogi Adityanath in poll-bound Karnataka

    [ad_1]

    Mangaluru: Raising the pitch for the BJP’s election campaign in south Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Saturday held massive roadshows at Puttur and Bantwal in Dakshina Kannada district and Karkala in Udupi.

    Adityanath, who first arrived in Puttur, where party candidate Asha Thimmappa Gowda is pitted against Ashok Kumar Rai of Congress and a BJP rebel Arun Kumar Puthila, said the BJP is taking the country on path of progress.

    Addressing the gathering from the campaign vehicle after the end of his roadshow, Adityanath said the Congress has always been trying to put hurdles on the path of progress.

    MS Education Academy

    Though the Congress tried to prevent the construction of Ram temple in Ayodhya, the BJP successfully fought the issue in court and the temple will turn into a reality in the near future, he said.

    The Congress is now after Bajrang Dal as the party is against patriotic people and try out to demoralise those who uphold nationalist policies, he said.

    Adityanath said the people of Karnataka should vote for a Team India’ to strengthen the hands of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He said the BJP has fielded the best candidate in Puttur and asked voters to support Asha Thimmappa Gowda.

    Adityanath later campaigned for State Energy Minister V Sunil Kumar at Karkala in Udupi, where also the BJP is facing an unlikely rebel in the form of Sri Ram Sene chief Pramod Muthalik. Congress has fielded Muniyalu Uday Shetty, a confidante of former Chief Minister Veerappa Moily in the seat.

    The Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister held a grand roadshow in Karkala and spoke to the gathering in a few words exhorting them to vote for a “double engine” government for sustained progress.

    At the final roadshow of the day at B C Road in Bantwal, where BJP’s young leader and incumbent MLA Rajesh Naik is facing former Minister B Ramanath Rai of Congress, Adityanath was given a rousing welcome by enthusiastic party workers.

    Addressing the huge gathering, Adityanath called upon the people of Karnataka to stop the Congress from coming to power as the party has declared intention to ban patriotic organisations like the Bajrang Dal. “Congress is always blocking the path to progress initiated by the BJP government under Narendra Modi,” he said.

    In a passionate speech, he also invited the people of Karnataka to Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh when the Ram temple will be inaugurated in January next year, to the loud cheers from the public.

    In all the three meetings, BJP state president Nalin Kumar Kateel and leaders including candidates in the respective segments accompanied Adityanath.

    [ad_2]
    #BJP #country #path #progress #Yogi #Adityanath #pollbound #Karnataka

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Lewis Hamilton hopes car upgrades will be ‘start of a new path’ for Mercedes

    Lewis Hamilton hopes car upgrades will be ‘start of a new path’ for Mercedes

    [ad_1]

    Lewis Hamilton has expressed cautious optimism that his Mercedes team are on the right track in terms of improving their car after a miserable start to the 2023 Formula One season.

    Mercedes have already admitted they are to abandon their current car concept to adopt a new approach in an attempt to catch the championship leaders Red Bull and Hamilton believed his team were at least on the road to recovery.

    Speaking before this weekend’s Azerbaijan Grand Prix, where Mercedes have brought the first of what is expected to be a swathe of small developments to the car, Hamilton was encouraged by the direction the team were taking and hopeful that the car might demonstrate it in Baku.

    “I think it will be an upgrade, naturally, but I think it will be kind of the start of a new path for us,” he said. “It will be at the core still the same car, but part of the path of getting where we want to be.

    “We’re not going to hit the ground and be where we wanted to be at the start of the season, we’re not making up that crazy ground that there is but I think it’s really positive, that so much great work has been done back in the factory to make time to progress in the right direction.”

    Hamilton scored Mercedes’ first podium of the season at the last round in Australia but the team did not read too much into the result, believing it was likely track specific. They are third in the constructors’ championship, nine points behind Aston Martin and already 67 behind Red Bull who have a dominant car, with Max Verstappen leading the drivers’ championship. Mercedes are expected to bring their first major development of their car’s new concept to Imola in May.

    F1 is adopting its new sprint race weekend format in Baku, with qualifying for the GP on Friday and then a standalone qualifying and sprint on Saturday, limiting practice to only one session. Hamilton remained hopeful Mercedes could at least get among the front runners, while welcoming the introduction of four competitive sessions over a weekend.

    “The last race was really great for us, we worked hard to get that sort of result,” he said. “It won’t be easy to do that again, the Ferraris will be quick, the Red Bulls, the Astons. I just hope we are in the mix and with the shake up of the whole weekend, it’s probably the most exciting weekend so far.”

    [ad_2]
    #Lewis #Hamilton #hopes #car #upgrades #start #path #Mercedes
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • India can become ‘vishwaguru’ only by following path of religion: Mohan Bhagwat

    India can become ‘vishwaguru’ only by following path of religion: Mohan Bhagwat

    [ad_1]

    Burhanpur: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday said that India will become ‘vishwaguru’ only by following the path of religion and will show the path to the world.

    Bhagwat was addressing the Dharma Sanskriti Sabha in Madhya Pradesh’s Burhanpur.

    “India will become vishwaguru only by following the path of religion. If we all keep following the religion, then in the coming 20-30 years, India will become the vishwaguru who will show the world a new path,” Bhagwat said.

    MS Education Academy

    He said that religion means the feeling of the welfare of the whole world.

    “We have to fulfil our duty by following the path of truth. India does not have to become a superpower but has to teach religion to the world. People of different languages, sects and religions live in India. Despite being different, we know that entire creation is one. That’s why we are Hindus. We have to take everyone along with mutual respect for each other,” he said.

    The RSS chief asked people to follow the teachings of saints and sages.

    “Since time immemorial they have been showing us the path of goodness. We all have to bear the burden of the welfare of the world together,” Bhagwat said.

    The Dharma Sanskriti Sabha was organized by Peethadhishwar Swami Jitendra Nath of the Nath Peeth located in Amravati, Maharashtra.

    Bhagwat reached Burhanpur in MP on a two-day tour. On the first day, Mohan Bhagwat organized a grand Dharma Sanskriti Sammelan in Bhagya district, which was presided over by Saint Swami Vasudevanand Saraswati of Badrikashram Himalaya.

    [ad_2]
    #India #vishwaguru #path #religion #Mohan #Bhagwat

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • RSS chief calls for moving forward on path of service for harmony

    RSS chief calls for moving forward on path of service for harmony

    [ad_1]

    Jaipur: RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat on Friday said that India will become a world leader only when the whole of the country is perfect and healthy.

    “We have to make every part of the society strong and the whole world a family while following the spirit of service. This is possible only when the work of service becomes a society-wide campaign. We have to make such an effort,” he said at the inauguration ceremony of the three-day RSS-affiliated National Sewa Bharti’s Seva Sangam at Keshav Vidyapeeth, Jamdoli here.

    Bhagwat said that people should put an end to their challenges and problems and present an example of devotion, knowledge and action to the whole world. “At the same time, the gentlemen who serve should move together as a group. With this we will be able to achieve our goal easily.”

    MS Education Academy

    He said that the spirit of service is sensitive. “Although there is sensation in animals other than humans and it is often reflected, the sense of action in sensation is limited to humans only,” he said. Referring to the ongoing meetings of the G-20, he said that compassion should be the basis of international relations as well.

    The RSS chief also said that our ultimate aim should be to make everyone like us through service. With this spirit, every part of the society will be self-reliant and no one will remain backward or weak in the country.

    Piramal Group Chairman Ajay Piramal said that his organisation is also engaged in service works based on Bhagavad Gita. He also quoted a couplet of Saint Rahim.

    Seer Balayogi Umesh Nath Maharaj emphasised on social harmony along with service work, saying that we have to bring the underprivileged society closer to us by taking forward our eternal tradition.

    Earlier, industrialist Narseeram Kularia gave the welcome address. National Service Bharati President Pannalal Bhansali gave the vote of thanks. The programme was coordinated by Rashtriya Seva Bharti General Secretary Renu Pathak.

    On this occasion, the guests inaugurated the Seva Sadhana magazine.

    RSS leaders Dattatreya Hosabale, Suresh ‘Bhaiyyaji’ Joshi, Mukund C.R., Mahamandaleshwar Paramhans Swami Maheshwaranand and Vishwa Jagruti Mission founder Acharya Sudhanshu Maharaj were present along with prominent saints and people associated with service works.

    [ad_2]
    #RSS #chief #calls #moving #path #service #harmony

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • No ‘middle path’, our demand for JPC is ‘non-negotiable’: Jairam Ramesh

    No ‘middle path’, our demand for JPC is ‘non-negotiable’: Jairam Ramesh

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh on Saturday said he does not see a “middle path” to end the logjam in Parliament as the Opposition’s demand for a JPC probe into the Adani issue was “non-negotiable” and the question of an apology over Rahul Gandhi’s remarks in the UK does not arise.

    In an interview with PTI, Ramesh said the government is rattled by 16 Opposition parties coming together to demand a joint parliamentary probe into the Adani issue and is resorting to a “3D orchestrated campaign — distort, defame and divert”.

    The former Union minister also hit out at BJP MP Nishikant Dubey’s efforts to seek termination of Rahul Gandhi’s membership of Lok Sabha over his remarks in the UK, saying all this was “intimidation” and part of efforts to distract from the real issues.

    The remarks by the Congress general secretary in-charge communications come amid the logjam in Parliament over Gandhi’s remarks during his recent trip to the UK, with both houses failing to transact any significant business on the first five days of the budget session’s second half.

    Also on Friday, Home Minister Amit Shah said the current logjam in Parliament can be resolved if the Opposition comes forward for talks and that the government will go “two steps ahead” if the Opposition takes “two steps forward”.

    Asked if there is any chance of finding a middle path to break the current logjam in Parliament with the BJP sticking to its demand of Rahul Gandhi’s apology and Congress seeking a JPC probe into the Adani issue, Ramesh said, “I don’t see any middle path because our demand for a JPC is non-negotiable and the question of an apology does not arise.”

    “In order to divert attention from this legitimate and reasonable demand for a JPC, the BJP is insisting on an apology. An apology for what, the current prime minister (Narendra Modi) has repeatedly in China, Germany, South Korea, and various parts of the world used forums to raise domestic political issues and to criticize his political opponents. He should be making an apology why should Rahul Gandhi be making any apology for highlighting what the state of democracy is in our country today,” he said.

    There is an “undeclared emergency” prevailing in the country, Ramesh alleged.

    Asked about the BJP’s charge that Gandhi sought intervention from foreign countries, the Congress leader dismissed the charge, calling it “absolute bunkum and nonsense”.

    He argued that whatever Gandhi said in the UK is a matter of record with its videos and transcripts available.

    “He (Gandhi) is very clear, he said ‘India’s problems have to be solved internally through the electoral process, these are internal issues’. But he also said democracy in India is a public good and if India is democratic, not only India benefits but the world also benefits,” Ramesh said.

    “This is a canard, an absolute lie that is being propagated by the BJP,” he said of the BJP’s foreign intervention charge.

    Whatever remarks are being attributed to the former Congress chief, he never said it, Ramesh said.

    “What the BJP has been doing in the past couple of days is that it is distorting Mr. Rahul Gandhi’s remarks in order to divert. This is the 3D orchestrated strategy of Mr. Modi — distort, defame, and divert. Why divert, because there is growing evidence daily of the complicity of the establishment, the PM himself, in this massive scam of Adani in which crores and crores of rupees of public institutions LIC, SBI, and other financial institutions are involved and crores of Indians are suffering because of this cronyism,” Ramesh alleged.

    Asked about BJP MP Dubey’s demand that Gandhi be expelled from the House for his remarks in the UK, Ramesh said, “This is intimidation. If they want to give a motion to the Speaker, they are welcome to do so. Mr. Gandhi will reply.”

    According to rule 357, Gandhi is allowed a personal explanation in Parliament, Ramesh said, citing that in 2015, BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad was allowed a personal explanation in response to some remarks made against him by Jyotiraditya Scindia, who was in the Congress back then.

    “Yesterday, for almost 15 minutes the microphones went off, it was collective mute,” he alleged.

    On disruption rather than debate becoming the norm, Ramesh said the Opposition does not have a say as it is also not allowed to discuss issues such as Adani, China as well as economic matters.

    “One of the fundamental rules of parliamentary democracy is that the Opposition must have its say and the government will have its way. We know we don’t have the numbers in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha but we are not even allowed to have our say and now efforts are being made to tarnish the Opposition’s (image), saying that the Opposition is responsible (for the adjournments),” he said.

    Ramesh said that it was the treasury benches that forced the adjournments, and not the Opposition.

    During his interactions in the UK, Gandhi alleged that the structures of Indian democracy are under attack and there is a “full-scale assault” on the country’s institutions. He also told British parliamentarians in London that microphones are often “turned off” in the Lok Sabha when an opposition member raises important issues.

    Gandhi’s remarks triggered a political slugfest, with the BJP accusing him of maligning India on foreign soil and seeking foreign interventions, and the Congress hit back at the ruling party by citing instances of Modi raising internal politics abroad.

    [ad_2]
    #middle #path #demand #JPC #nonnegotiable #Jairam #Ramesh

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • There is a path to Scottish independence. Sturgeon was brilliant, but she just couldn’t see it | Simon Jenkins

    There is a path to Scottish independence. Sturgeon was brilliant, but she just couldn’t see it | Simon Jenkins

    [ad_1]

    An independent Scotland has not been hindered by Nicola Sturgeon’s departure; it could well be advanced by it. Her eight years as first minister have been remarkable, but failed to bring statehood closer to reality. The question is whether her intransigence postponed it.

    Sturgeon made a strategic error after her predecessor Alex Salmond lost the 2014 independence referendum. She assumed her charisma could swiftly erode the 55% turnout for continued union with England and secure a victorious rerun of the poll. Despite her electoral successes, she never seriously dented that majority. All Sturgeon could do was plunge an ever more visceral anti-Englishness into courtroom battles with London that she was never likely to win.

    Salmond had in 2014 foolishly rejected David Cameron’s offer of a second referendum option for so-called “devo max”, a radically enhanced Scottish autonomy. This would certainly have passed, with polls indicating 66% support among Scottish voters. While devo max was a constitutional can of worms, it could not have been wished away. It should have begun a drastic restructuring of the Scottish economy away from dependence on – and therefore control from – London. At very least it would have put serious autonomy within the realm of plausibility.

    The question now is how far could a new SNP leader take such a move towards greater autonomy forward, possibly aided by sensible and open-minded leaders of the Labour and Tory parties. To Sturgeon, the issue bordered on the theological. As with Salmond, it was freedom or bust, independence or serfdom. They wanted their own currency, their own debt, a hard border with England, membership of the EU and no UK weapons on Scottish soil. This was fantasy enough but at no point did it engage in the elephant in the independence room – economics.

    david cameron and alex salmond
    Alex Salmond in 2014 foolishly rejected David Cameron’s offer of a second referendum option for so-called “devo max”. Photograph: Murdo MacLeod/The Guardian

    Gazing across the Irish Sea, we can all study Ireland’s experience since independence a century ago, when under British rule it was among the poorest nations in Europe. Depending on definition, it is today one of the most prosperous. But it took Dublin 50 years of austerity and pain – including a meagre welfare state – to get there. Not until the 1980s did it achieve such key indicators of growth as a net inflow of investment, population and talent, and “Celtic tiger” status.

    There is no tartan tiger. Sturgeon’s leadership enabled the Scots to have their cake and eat it. Her fierce nationalism gave voters emotional satisfaction. She ran hospitals, schools, trains, law and order, while Covid gave Scotland a degree of administrative discretion. Limited scope to raise top income taxes allowed a generous family support package and free student tuition. But this did not deliver the Scottish people conspicuously better services, and it depended heavily on an annual subsidy from London.

    Scotland’s budget deficit in 2020-21 of 22% of GDP was among the largest of any nation in the western world, though surging oil and gas revenues have recently cut it back. Similarly sized Denmark runs a surplus of 4%. The annual UK government grant to Scotland announced last October was a record £41bn. This is money a Scottish treasury would have to find on its own, which is why Scotland’s standard of living needs union into the foreseeable future. As Ireland shows, there is a path out of dependency, but it is neither easy nor swift.

    the Scottish Parliament building at Holyrood in Edinburgh
    ‘Federalism covers a spectrum of options but its purpose is to offer Scotland a freer hand to raise and spend public money’: the Scottish parliament building at Holyrood in Edinburgh. Photograph: Jane Barlow/PA

    Federal constitutions in Spain, Switzerland and Germany indicate that the key to autonomy lies in fiscal freedom, in the capacity to grow, earn and spend, independent of policies ordained by a central government. The Basques and the Swiss cantons enjoy fiscal discretions unthinkable to the British Treasury – but the key lies in fiscal self-sufficiency. Advocates of independence persistently fail to confront this.

    There is no reason why Scotland cannot approach the prosperity of Ireland or Scandinavia. Decades of reliance on the most centralist political economy in Europe – that of the UK – have crippled Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Devo max might aim to embrace some of Ireland’s libertarian taxes along with Norway’s links to the EU’s single market. It might conceivably join with Northern Ireland in its revitalised Brexit protocol, ingeniously returning to the EU’s trading regime and yet free to trade with England. A digital border would be complicated, as Ireland is showing, but it would honour the clear vote of a majority of Scots against Brexit.

    The concept of devo max – so-called “full fiscal autonomy” or “radical federalism” – is now debated by many on the fringes of the independence debate, in Wales as well as Scotland. The effort is to move forward from political confrontation. Federalism covers a spectrum of options but its purpose is to offer Scotland a freer hand to raise and spend public money, while offering London relief from a heavy burden in Scotland. It would be what Ireland was denied by England in the 19th century, true home rule under the crown. Had it been granted, the old United Kingdom might still be one.

    As for Sturgeon’s successor, such an outcome could deliver a new Scotland mercifully at peace with London. Or it could prepare a path to full independence if that were, in my view sadly, to be Scotland’s eventual choice.

    [ad_2]
    #path #Scottish #independence #Sturgeon #brilliant #couldnt #Simon #Jenkins
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Opinion | ‘Aspirational Conservatism’: A New Path for the Republican Party

    Opinion | ‘Aspirational Conservatism’: A New Path for the Republican Party

    [ad_1]

    aspirational conservatism illo

    These are not the only paths.

    Another consistent strain of thought and action among conservatives over the past several decades argues policy should be on the side of the little guy and that our existing economic and social institutions also provide the best paths to opportunity. This type of thinking has gone by different names in the past, including “reform conservatism” and “compassionate conservativism.” In the 1990s, it animated much of the GOP’s agenda in Republican-led states and big cities, and was seen in the policies of congressional thought leaders such as Jack Kemp, Dan Coats and Paul Ryan, and the presidency of George W. Bush.

    The goal was to use what is best about our market economy — job growth in dynamic sectors, innovation that raises wages and creates new opportunities — while correcting its shortcomings through a blend of grassroots civil society efforts and reforms to government programs so people are really equipped to participate in the economy.

    Many on the Trumpian right, including those who claim to want the GOP to be the party of the working class, reject this approach. They assert it would allow “free-market fundamentalists” to rule the party. That’s simply not the case. Proponents of this philosophy believe that a market economy provides the best path up for those lower on the economic ladder — but also that government has an obligation to remove barriers as they strive to move up and provide a variety of supports to assist them as they do.

    It’s an “aspirational conservatism,” as we call it, that prioritizes upward mobility for ordinary people. Compassionate conservatism and reform conservatism focused largely on poverty, work and families. Aspirational conservatism could build on those previous iterations by addressing what today are the most important issues felt by middle- and working-class families alike. And it could guide the Republican Party in the months and years to come, delivering both political victory and a real governing agenda.

    In numerous surveys in recent years, voters across the political and socioeconomic spectrum have expressed an interest in leadership that puts job opportunity, housing affordability, public safety and good schools front and center. This creates an opportunity for conservatives who want neither anti-government ideology nor hyperactive culture warring.

    Republicans should focus on three sets of issues.

    First, the GOP should create a clear set of policy objectives to support opportunity, individual initiative and hope. The party should reject simplistic, binary choices on questions of government assistance and instead advocate for public policies that boost the twin themes of freedom and dignity.

    Conservatives should support individual initiative while also updating safety net programs to help individuals and families when they falter. An aspirational agenda would focus on incentives for states and localities to lower the cost of housing by increasing supply, provide new skills to workers in dynamic sectors, help lower the costs of caring for young children, and support a new round of common-sense school reforms to meet heightened parental demand for education alternatives after the policy failures of the pandemic. These issues — housing, job opportunities, and quality care and schooling for children — are at the heart of most people’s vision for the American Dream.

    Second, aspirational conservatives should be the voice of reason on crime and justice. Americans of all stripes have rated public safety among the most important issues, and yet elected leaders have mostly avoided providing solutions.

    Republicans should ensure police are well-trained and have the resources and ability to prosecute crimes, but they should do more. They should support reforms that elevate trust through community policing and prevention strategies, including programs that help at-risk youth find purpose in school and work. A coherent policy incorporates all of these principles in order to ensure that trust in police rises while crime decreases and, in the words of sociologist James Q. Wilson, the benefits of working exceed the benefits from stealing.

    Third, aspirational conservatives should break from a growing preference on the right for wielding federal power in pursuit of moral goals.

    Conservatives should return to a robust view of federalism whenever possible as the best guarantee of diverse views around the country — calling on majorities to respect the minority opinions in their communities and calling out efforts by the left when it does the opposite. Federalism is essential to preserving personal freedom and honoring the independence of families, two values that most Americans consider essential to achieving the American Dream. Majorities also think the federal government has too much power, and heartland voters resent elites who impose their values on them. Even when it comes to socially conservative values with which most Republicans agree, using federal power to impose them on states and communities undermines fundamental conservative principles and risks a backlash from voters.

    With control of just one house of Congress, Republicans don’t have the power to implement this agenda yet. But they can embrace this approach on Capitol Hill and on the 2024 presidential campaign trail. As more and more voters tire of Trumpian bombast and the culture wars driving our politics, aspirational conservatives have a chance to show they are on the side of the majority of Americans who care most about a good quality of life, ample opportunity and a government that works for them. That’s not just good policy — it’s good politics.

    [ad_2]
    #Opinion #Aspirational #Conservatism #Path #Republican #Party
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Klobuchar rising: Leadership path opens for Minnesota Dem

    Klobuchar rising: Leadership path opens for Minnesota Dem

    [ad_1]

    After rising quietly but steadily since dropping out of the White House hunt nearly three years ago to endorse President Joe Biden, Klobuchar now chairs the Senate Rules Committee and, as chief of the Democratic Steering Committee, sits fourth in the leadership hierarchy. The 62-year-old could keep testing how big her internal clout can get within the Democratic caucus.

    Or she could once again test the national stage as a relatively centrist problem-solver in a progressive-heavy field in four years, and vie to succeed Biden as the party’s national standard-bearer. The caucus is already abuzz about who will replace retiring No. 3 Democratic leader Debbie Stabenow of Michigan and Klobuchar’s possible ascension to that spot, according to a person briefed on internal conversations.

    Ultimately, the succession plan is mostly up to Schumer. And he praised Klobuchar in a statement for this story without tipping his hand: “Amy has an amazing sense of the confluence of policy, press, and politics.”

    Approached in the Capitol, Klobuchar declined an interview request for this story. Her spokesperson Jane Meyer said in a statement: “There is always a lot of gossip in the hallways of Congress. I can tell you 100 percent that the senator is focused on one and only one thing: her work.”

    Stabenow’s impending departure will offer ambitious, younger Senate Democrats a new opportunity to gain power in the party. Yet if Klobuchar has any designs on running for president again, perhaps in 2028 when the Democratic nomination is expected to be open, she may demur from rising further within Hill leadership.

    One Senate Democrat said Klobuchar has “all the credentials and leadership skills” to continue climbing if she wants to.

    “My view of it would be, which path are you going to choose? My sense is that the legislative leadership path is not consistent with presidential ambition,” the senator said, addressing the matter on condition of anonymity. “I think she does [look at the White House]. That’s just my gut.”

    Klobuchar also has developed a policy profile that stands out in the Democratic Party. She’s championed a stringent tech antitrust bill, though Schumer declined to bring it up under a unified Democratic government the last two years and it faces an uncertain fate under the current divided government.

    Her Rules committee also moved a bipartisan proposal to modernize the 19th-century Electoral Count Act last Congress, a bill that ultimately became the only post-Jan. 6 reform to become law. That legislative success relied on her strong relationship with then-Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), at the time her GOP counterpart. And Klobuchar maintains tight relationships with Republicans; on Monday she introduced a campaign finance enforcement bill with Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.).

    “Sen. Klobuchar is very respected within the caucus for her strategic sense, and for her grasp of how to communicate with Americans … people value that skill set. Her fundraising capacity is maybe underrated a little bit, but it’s definitely there,” said Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.). “She brings a lot to the caucus in that way.”

    Klobuchar’s next sequential move in leadership would be ascending to the post currently held by Stabenow, who runs the Democratic Policy and Communications Center. That post, leading the caucus’ central clearinghouse for messaging, served as the springboard for Schumer to become Democratic leader. Stabenow declined to comment on who succeeds her, and said she’s “got two more years of robustly and effectively leading” the center.

    Above Stabenow is Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who has been whip since 2005, next faces reelection in 2026 and has faced no challenges in recent years. Durbin declined to address the leadership team’s future in a brief interview, saying only: “Nice try.”

    Leadership’s other positions are more fluid in the hierarchy: Stabenow was the No. 4 leader until Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) left Schumer’s team to join the presidential line of succession as president pro tempore, and became No. 3 leader while maintaining the same DPCC chairmanship.

    Seniority matters more in Congress for Democrats than it does in the GOP, where term limits create more turnover in leadership and in committee chairmanships. And it’s unclear if any of the current Democrats on Schumer’s expanded leadership team would be an heir apparent to the current majority leader, who at 72 could easily try to stay on for years to come.

    That means Klobuchar isn’t the only senator charting a new course since the 2020 primaries nominated Biden and scattered the rest of the party’s rising stars. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) are both running for congressional reelection, with Warren serving as a leading pragmatic progressive and Gillibrand bearing down on her signature issue of military justice.

    Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) now chairs the influential Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and is also weighing whether to run again. And Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), another of Biden’s 2020 primary foes, is the vice chair of Stabenow’s messaging panel.

    In an interview, Booker said he feels “blessed” to be on the leadership team but isn’t thinking about whether he or — someone else like Klobuchar — might succeed Stabenow.

    “It’s two years until we face that question,” he said.

    [ad_2]
    #Klobuchar #rising #Leadership #path #opens #Minnesota #Dem
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • World Athletics proposals to preserve path for trans women in female category

    World Athletics proposals to preserve path for trans women in female category

    [ad_1]

    World Athletics is set to keep the door open for transgender women to compete at the highest level under controversial new proposals that will be voted on in March.

    Under the governing body’s “preferred option”, the maximum permitted plasma testosterone for trans women would be halved from five nanomoles per litre to 2.5 nmol/L – and they would also have to stay below the permitted threshold for two years rather than 12 months as is currently the case.

    However, that option is likely to prove contentious given that in its consultation document, seen by the Guardian, World Athletics accepts that trans women “retain an advantage in muscle mass, volume and strength over cis women after 12 months” of hormone treatment – and that “the limited experimental data” suggests that those advantages continue after that.

    Also the document adds that: “Exposure to puberty also results in sex differences in height, weight, wingspan (throws), pelvic and lower limbs architecture. These anatomical differences provide an athletic advantage after puberty for certain athletic events and will not respond to suppression of blood testosterone levels in post-pubertal trans women.”

    However, World Athletics maintains that its preferred option would work as it would “allow significant (although not full reduction in anaerobic, aerobic and body composition) changes, while still providing a path for eligibility of trans women and 46 XY individuals to compete in the female category”.

    The new rules would also apply to athletes with differences in sex development, such as Caster Semenya – who are 46 XY individuals with testes but were brought up as women – across every athletic discipline at elite level. As things stand, athletes with a DSD only have to reduce their testosterone in events ranging from 400m to a mile.

    “Both DSD and transgender regulations apply to athletes who are 46 XY individuals aiming at competing in the female category,” the consultation document states.

    “An analysis of DSD cases observed in elite athletes shows that most athletes are 46 XY persons who have testes that produce testosterone concentrations within the male range and who are not insensitive to the effects of androgens. As far as athletic performance is concerned, there is no significant difference between a 46 XY DSD individual, a cis male and a trans female prior to transition. Therefore, in this respect there is a need for consistency between the transgender and DSD regulations.”

    A World Athletics spokesperson said that putting forward a preferred option was “the best way to gather constructive feedback, but this does not mean this is the option that will be presented to council or indeed adopted” and promised they would consult more widely in the coming weeks.

    “In terms of our female eligibility regulations, we will follow the science and the decade and more of the research we have in this area in order to protect the female category, maintain fairness in our competitions and remain as inclusive as possible,” they added.

    [ad_2]
    #World #Athletics #proposals #preserve #path #trans #women #female #category
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )