Tag: Money

  • SC to hear plea of journalist Rana Ayyub against summons in money laundering case

    SC to hear plea of journalist Rana Ayyub against summons in money laundering case

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on Monday the petition of journalist Rana Ayyub challenging the summons issued to her by a special PMLA court in Ghaziabad in a money laundering case lodged against her by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

    According to the list of business uploaded on the apex court website, Ayyub’s petition is listed before a bench of Justices V Ramasubramanian and JB Pardiwala.

    Earlier on January 17, a CJI DY Chandrachud-led bench had agreed to consider listing the plea of the journalist for urgent hearing after taking note of the submissions of advocate Vrinda Grover who appeared for Ayyub.

    Grover had said a summons was issued by the special court in Ghaziabad against Ayyub for January 27 and therefore the matter be listed urgently.

    In her writ petition, Ayyub has sought quashing of the proceedings initiated by the ED in Ghaziabad citing lack of jurisdiction as the alleged offence of money laundering occurred in Mumbai.

    On November 29 last year, the special PMLA court in Ghaziabad had taken cognizance of the prosecution complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate and summoned Ayyub.

    It had noted that the prosecution complaint (ED version of charge sheet) under section 45 read with section 44 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 for the commission of offences of money laundering has been filed by Sanjeet Kumar Sahu, Assistant Director of Enforcement, Delhi.

    “I have perused the above mentioned prosecution complaint and have also gone through the prosecution papers as well as documents including statements. From the perusal of the entire record there is sufficient evidence as to a prima facie case for taking cognizance against Ms. Rana Ayyub with regard to commission of offence “, the special court judge said.

    The special court has noted the alleged offence pertains to obtaining illegally money from the general public in the name of charity via ‘Ketto’ platform (an online crowdfunding platform) in three campaigns without any kind of approval, raising huge amounts in the bank account of her sister and father and later transferring the same to her own bank account which was not used for the intended purpose.

    She is accused of acquiring proceeds of crime and creating assets for herself.

    On October 12 last year, the ED had filed a charge sheet against Ayyub, accusing her of cheating the public and utilising charity funds worth Rs 2.69 crore for creating her personal assets, and also violating the foreign contribution law.

    “Rana Ayyub launched three fundraiser charity campaigns on the ‘Ketto platform’ starting from April 2020 and collected funds totalling Rs 2,69,44,680,” the ED had said in a statement.

    The campaigns, it had said, were meant to raise funds for slum dwellers and farmers, relief work for Assam, Bihar and Maharashtra, and help Ayyub and her team to help those impacted by COVID-19 in India.

    The probe found that the funds raised on the online platforms were received in the accounts of Ayyub’s father and sister and subsequently transferred to her personal accounts, the ED alleged.

    “Ayyub utilised these funds to create a fixed deposit of Rs 50 lakh for herself and also transferred Rs 50 lakh to a new bank account. Investigations found that only about Rs 29 lakh was used for relief work,” it had claimed.

    “In order to claim more expenses towards relief work, fake bills were submitted by Ayyub and subsequently, bank balances in the accounts of Ayyub amounting to Rs 1,77,27,704 (including FD of Rs 50 Lakh) were attached under the PMLA vide a provisional attachment order dated February 4, 2022,” it had said.

    The ED had initiated money laundering investigation on the basis of an FIR registered on September 7, 2021 by the Indirapuram Police Station of Ghaziabad in Uttar Pradesh under various sections of the IPC, Information Technology Amendment Act 2008 and Black Money Act against Ayyub.

    It was also alleged that Ayyub received foreign contributions without registration under FCRA.

    On August 17 last year, the Delhi High Court had restrained the ED from proceeding further with the provisional attachment of funds in connection with the alleged money laundering probe against her.

    On April 4 last year, the Delhi High Court had allowed Ayyub to travel abroad while questioning the ED over a Look Out Circular (LOC) issued against her barring her from travelling abroad.

    Ayyub was stopped by the ED from taking a flight to London from the Mumbai airport in March as the agency had then opened a ‘Look out Circular’ against her.

    [ad_2]
    #hear #plea #journalist #Rana #Ayyub #summons #money #laundering #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • ‘Guide’ Took Pilgrims To Iran, Left Them In Beirut and Fled With Their Money

    ‘Guide’ Took Pilgrims To Iran, Left Them In Beirut and Fled With Their Money

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: A self-styled ‘Guide’ has duped at least 10 Kashmiri pilgrims, after taking money from them to show sacred shrines and places in Iran, Iraq, and other countries, leaving them mid-way in Beirut, the capital city of Lebanon.

    At least 10 pilgrims are stuck in Delhi this time, requesting Jammu and Kashmir Administration to help them return home as they are without money.

    One of the pilgrims Ghulam Hasan Wani of Devara Yetalampora village of Singhpora Pattan told over the phone from Delhi that a Guide Syed Nasir from Harennarah Pattan took Rs one lakh per person to help them on pilgrimage to Karbala and other sacred sites.

    “After performing the pilgrimage, the guide left us mid-way in Beirut without informing us. He is still absconding. We suffered heavily as we were not having money with us. We sold our valuables including the earrings and gold chains of women pilgrims accompanying us. Somehow we have managed to reach New Delhi,” he said.

    The pilgrims said that they have no money to return back to Valley as they have no money and are starving.

    They appealed to LG Manoj Sinha led administration to help them in returning home and direct police to take action against the guide.

    “We can’t narrate our sufferings in words. We are illiterates and yet he (Guide) left us in the lurch,” said a woman pilgrim. (KNT)

    [ad_2]
    #Guide #Pilgrims #Iran #Left #Beirut #Fled #Money

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • The week in audio: Joanna & the Maestro; Conversations from a Long Marriage; Real Money; Ken Bruce

    The week in audio: Joanna & the Maestro; Conversations from a Long Marriage; Real Money; Ken Bruce

    [ad_1]

    Joanna & the Maestro (Cup & Nuzzle, Burning Bright Productions and Bauer Media) | Planet Radio
    Conversations from a Long Marriage (Radio 4) | BBC Sounds
    Real Money: The Hunt for Tether’s Billions (Tortoise Media) | Tortoise
    Ken Bruce (Radio 2) | BBC Sounds

    All-the-medals national treasure Dame Joanna Lumley has a new classical music podcast with her husband, Stephen “Stevie” Barlow. It’s called Joanna & the Maestro and it’s quite the most wonderfully fruity thing you ever heard. Just 10 minutes in its company and you find yourself describing things – even quite ordinary things, such as a cup of coffee or the dog – as divine. Beautiful. Exquisite. Gorgeous.

    Gorgeous is what Lumley does, and gorgeous is what she loves, as she explains in the first episode. When she was young, she loved the piano and wanted to play. But she struggled with reading the notes, so lessons went no further. Still, she and her family listened to classical records, and she heard music, too, when doing dance classes in Malaya, specifically Offenbach’s Barcarolle: “I can hear it to this day.” When pop came along, “I liked gorgeous music, so I loved the Everly Brothers… Elvis had a beautiful voice.”

    Barlow, the maestro of the title, and just as fruity as Lumley, is an esteemed conductor. He has an office in their garden – “the music room” (pronounced “rum”) – where he works and where the podcast is recorded, and occasionally he pops over to the piano and tinkles out a tune. We learn that, in contrast to Lumley, Barlow had two piano teachers when he was young, one for theory, one for playing, and progressed to the King’s School, Canterbury, where his talent was nurtured further. His knowledge leads to some interesting details, such as the order in which members of an orchestra are listed on a score and a discussion about castrati and countertenors.

    Oh, it’s all divine, delicious and lovely, including the music, and they are sweet company, though I was slightly brought up short when Barlow exclaimed: “I’m discovering so many things about you!”, in contrast to Lumley’s encouraging him to tell stories she clearly already knows. He’s been primed to excel throughout his life, while she has a tendency to put down her own knowledge, just to encourage him some more. “Stevie, this is what I wanted us to do in these shows,” she says. “Me being the average listener and you being the above-average musician, able to give answers.”

    In an odd piece of timing, Lumley is also appearing on Radio 4 as one half of a happily married couple, this time fictional. Conversations from a Long Marriage, starring Lumley and Roger Allam, written by Jan Etherington, is being rerun ahead of season 4, and nestles happily in its 6.30pm comedy slot. It’s cosy and gentle and – for me – slightly phoned in by these two great actors. The stories and jokes often revolve around one of them desiring a bit more attention from the other: we’ve had Joanna wanting Roger to be more physically affectionate, like a lusty couple they know, and Roger being grumpy about Joanna working with a dynamic younger man. Surely most long-term couples are relaxed about such things, while being far spikier about others? Perhaps I’m wrong, and everyone else, apart from me and my husband, is in an exquisite Joanna & the Maestro-style relationship. Whatever, I will always have time for Lumley, who somehow manages to make everything in life, even ludicrous garden bridges, more absolutely fabulous (sorry). There are few people who can do that.

    Another woman who never lets you down is the excellent tech journalist Aleks Krotoski. As host of Radio 4’s The Digital Human she is full of delighted, doggedly earned knowledge about the virtual world, but also, vitally, she’s a great storyteller. Her scripts are consistently on point, and she delivers them with panache.

    Krotoski has spent the past year looking at cryptocurrency for Tortoise Media, and Real Money: The Hunt for Tether’s Billions is the result. Cryptocurrency Tether’s USP is that it is tethered to the US dollar. One tether equals one dollar, so it seems a safe bet. Before you start yawning, not only does Krotoski sell Tether’s story well, it’s a very interesting tale. Tether has never published its accounts, and a man called Nathan Anderson has offered $1m to anyone who can pin down just what Tether’s investments actually are. Even more intriguing is a central character called Brock Pierce, who has done many things in his life, including being a child actor in a 90s ice hockey film. Pierce is Tether’s daddy. Did you know that the physical centre of cryptocurrency – its Silicon Valley – is Puerto Rico? Me neither. Krotoski and producer Joanna Humphreys are there, tracking Pierce down – “It’s like we’re chasing ghosts” – and this show brings along even the least crypto-interested with them.

    Ken Bruce will join Greatest Hits Radio after more than three decades on Radio 2.
    Ken Bruce will join Greatest Hits Radio after more than three decades at Radio 2. Photograph: Bauer Media/PA

    Finally, what a shocker re Ken Bruce, eh? Bauer’s Greatest Hits Radio has pulled off a genuine coup in getting Bruce – plus his beloved PopMaster quiz – over to its station. The most successful commercial radio groups have been tempting big BBC talent to the dark (read: better-paying) side for the past few years, and it’s quite a tally once you start counting. Bauer has Simon Mayo and Ken Bruce; Global has John Humphrys, Andrew Marr, Emily Maitlis, Jon Sopel; Wireless has Chris Evans, Graham Norton and Vanessa Feltz. That’s five big ex-Radio 2s, three ex-Radio 4s and a BBC One-er. Plus, Greatest Hits also has Alex Lester, Richard Allinson, Mark Goodier and Jackie Brambles…

    So who will take over Ken’s old slot in March? Radio 2 has been shifting from golf club bants to a campier, female-friendly, 90s kitchen disco vibe for a few years now. Liza Tarbuck? Rylan Clark? We shall see.

    [ad_2]
    #week #audio #Joanna #Maestro #Conversations #Long #Marriage #Real #Money #Ken #Bruce
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Dark money group linked to Leonard Leo is dissolved

    Dark money group linked to Leonard Leo is dissolved

    [ad_1]

    But just three days after POLITICO’s inquiries, the BH Fund closed down, according to documents filed with the Virginia State Corporation Commission.

    Adam Kennedy, a spokesperson for the firm now known as CRC Advisors, which had performed extensive consulting work for Leo in 2017 and is now led by him, said the BH Fund has been dormant since the end of 2021. He confirmed it was dissolved in October “as other organizations made it obsolete.”

    Indeed, Leo now controls more than $1.6 billion in conservative donor funds, and he is erecting a new architecture of dark-money groups to administer it. Critics have long maintained that understanding how Leo has distributed his trove of anonymous funds is critical to understanding how the conservative legal movement claimed a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court.

    “Nothing screams ‘efforts to conceal’ quite like folding up an organization just as you start getting questions about it,” said Saurav Ghosh, director of federal campaign finance reform for the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan nonprofit founded by a Republican former commissioner of the Federal Election Commission.

    Currently, a Senate committee is reviewing a new complaint requesting an investigation into whether federal ethics rules or criminal laws were broken in Conway’s sale of her business, Senate aides confirmed.

    Since POLITICO first contacted Leo and CRC last fall, they have not disputed BH Fund’s involvement in the transaction. In 2019, when asked about BH Fund for a Washington Post documentary, Leo said: “um, BH Fund is a charitable organization. You can look it up.” He continued: “I don’t waste my time on stories that involve money in politics because what I care about is ideas.”

    Under the current tax code, nonprofits like BH Fund can spend unlimited amounts of money on political activities without disclosing their donors — as long as they are deemed “social welfare” activities that do not primarily promote a political candidate. Legislative attempts to close loopholes allowing dark money in U.S. elections have repeatedly failed over the past decade.

    Leo’s apparent role in the sale of Conway’s business underscores why “influence of dark money is doubly problematic once someone is in office because they’re [potentially] able to influence outcomes,” said Ghosh.

    In its complaint addressed to Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Chair Gary Peters (D-Mich.), the Campaign for Accountability, a liberal watchdog group, cited a law barring executive branch employees from participating “personally and substantially” in any government matter affecting her or his own financial interests.

    “There are clear indications based on the facts at hand that Ms. Conway participated personally and substantially in advising President Trump to nominate Justices to the Supreme Court, and that her personal financial interests were affected,” the complaint submitted to the Senate said.

    Conway responded to the complaint in a text message to POLITICO: “That’s what outside groups ‘fighting for law and justice’ do to get attention. Use reporters,” she said.

    CRC spokesperson Kennedy said “liberal watchdog groups” who filed the complaint should instead urge hearings on a company that ran administration and management for a liberal dark money network that fought Trump’s judicial nominations and spent millions around the 2020 election.

    At the time of its purchase of Conway’s polling firm, CRC was also bringing in millions of dollars from Leo’s network of dark money nonprofits to promote his preferred court candidates, including at least $400,000 from BH Fund for “consulting.”

    In 2020, Leo officially joined a newly rebranded CRC Advisors as a chair.

    In an Oct. 21 email, POLITICO first approached CRC Advisors with a series of questions about the lien statements. Three days later, on Oct. 24, Jonathan Bunch, CRC Advisors president, signed articles of dissolution for BH Fund, according to documents filed with the Virginia State Corporation Commission. One day after the Dec. 20 story, an unsigned amendment terminating BH Fund’s 2017 lien was also filed with the commission.

    Leo’s network of outside groups built successful advocacy campaigns around the nominations of Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett and blocked President Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland. BH Fund operated alongside two other Leo-linked entities to promote Trump’s nominees.

    A flurry of House investigations into the Biden administration and the president’s son, Hunter, is expected to take center stage in the new Congress.

    Yet Democrats still control the Senate and its oversight committees. And concerns about the role of dark money in shaping the court’s new conservative majority are growing louder after the new conservative majority overturned the 50-year precedent of a federal right to abortion.

    The Conway transaction “is further evidence of the troubling role that Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society played in driving Donald Trump’s judicial selection process,” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said on Dec. 20 following POLITICO’s report.

    The complaint sent to Sen. Peters, which stresses the importance of a quick response, also put the issue on the radar of law enforcement as it cc’d Department of Justice Public Integrity Section Chief Corey Amundson.

    “It is all the more urgent that [the committee] investigate this matter because it is possible criminal charges against Ms. Conway may be precluded by the general five-year statute of limitations governing most federal crimes,” said the complaint.

    Regardless, the matter should not be ignored, said Michelle Kuppersmith, the liberal watchdog group’s executive director.

    “We want the Senate to make it clear you don’t operate like this” as a government official, she said in an interview. “Just like firefighters go in when they see smoke, it’s the Senate’s duty to investigate – for all the reasons we outlined in our complaint – to make it clear to government officials everywhere that potential wrongdoing will be investigated.”

    [ad_2]
    #Dark #money #group #linked #Leonard #Leo #dissolved
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Why are energy companies forcing their way into people’s homes?

    [ad_1]

    With energy bills soaring, many people are struggling to pay their bills – and those in the most difficult situations say they are having to skip meals to keep the heating on. But some people have found that their energy companies have taken drastic action if they fall behind on their payments – entering their homes to switch them to prepayment meters, or doing it remotely through their smart meters.

    With prepayment often more expensive than paying energy bills monthly or quarterly, and companies using it to claw back debt, is this exacerbating the problems vulnerable customers face? Alex Lawson tells Hannah Moore that campaigners have found customers have been forced to “self-disconnect” – with 3 million unable to top up their pre-payment meters some point last year.

    Will a fall in wholesale gas prices mean the situation improves – and what action are politicians taking to ease the problem?

    A person in dressing gown and gloves holding a water bottle.

    Photograph: Michael Heath/Alamy

    Support The Guardian

    The Guardian is editorially independent.
    And we want to keep our journalism open and accessible to all.
    But we increasingly need our readers to fund our work.

    Support The Guardian

    [ad_2]
    #energy #companies #forcing #peoples #homes
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Here’s Everything that You Need to Know About Fast Cash Loans

    Fast cash loan refers to a loan in which borrowers don’t have to wait for long to get their funds or get approved. This requires minimal documentation, and hence opting for this can be perfect for those people who need some emergency cash or when they are going through bad days. 

    Since fast cash loans have been gaining popularity recently, here is everything that you need to know about them before you apply for one: 

    1. What’s the process for getting a fast cash loan? When you are applying for a fast cash loan, you don’t require collateral, making it easy for you to get a loan. You can either apply for it near a store or get it by filling out an online application on the lender’s app or website. Your loan application only takes a few hours to get approved, and you don’t necessarily need a good CIBIL score

    When you apply for a fast cash loan, your lender might ask you for your income proof, personal contact details, identity proof, and they’ll also check your account information. 

    2. Fast loans are easy to qualify As the title suggests, fast loans are easy to qualify for and have easy qualification criteria. Your credit score is rarely taken into consideration which means that the chances of your loan getting denied are rare. Since these lenders don’t consider your credit score while giving you a loan, your credit score doesn’t get affected negatively. 

    3. Fast cash loans don’t allow you to borrow a large sum of moneySince fast cash loans are easy to get, they don’t allow you to borrow a large amount of money. These loans are meant to help you in emergencies like an accident, medical sickness or something else, and the interest charged is usually higher than other available loans. Hence, when you are applying for a fast cash loan, make sure you don’t demand a lot of money. 

    4. Your credit score isn’t required while taking a fast cash loanWhen you apply for a personal loan or a home loan, lenders usually check your credit score first to see if you qualify for getting a loan or not. Your credit score gives them an idea of your credit history, and when that’s too low, many people get rejected. However, fast cash loans don’t require your credit score, which means that you can get the loan without any problems in most cases. 

    5. They are unsecuredSince fast loans are unsecured, you won’t lose your car, house, property, or any other assets you own even when you become a defaulter. The lender might ask you to allow him to access your bank account when you fail to pay the money back, and hence it is recommended that when you take a fast loan, make sure you pay it on time. 

    6. Fast cash loans have the highest interest rate Since fast cash loans are the easiest to get and don’t require any collateral, lenders usually make the highest money on them by charging high-interest rates. The interest charges depend on the lender you are taking a loan from, and in most cases, the amount has to be paid back within a few weeks. 

    7. Fast cash loans vary by states Before applying for a fast cash loan, you must learn your state’s rules. Some states prohibit their citizens from getting fast cash loans, whereas other states have a limit on the loan amount. ConclusionWhile a fast cash loan is an excellent option for the people who aren’t eligible for another loan, others should try to look for an alternative loan option that comes with a lower interest rate because, ultimately, your priority should be paying the lowest amount.  

    Author Bio:Shiv Nanda is a financial analyst who currently lives in Bangalore (refusing to acknowledge the name change) and works with MoneyTap, India’s first app-based credit-line. Shiv is a true finance geek, and his friends love that. They always rely on him for advice on their investment choices, budgeting skills, personal financial matters and when they want to get a loan. He has made it his life’s mission to help and educate people on various financial topics, so email him your questions at shiv@freopay.com.

  • 72 Nations To Participate “No Money For Terror” Conference Hosted In India From 18th November

    72 Nations To Participate “No Money For Terror” Conference Hosted In India From 18th November

    [ad_1]

    In a two-day “No Money For Terror” event beginning Friday, India will utilise its security lens to show how it has been a victim of terror and the issues it has faced for decades.

    This conference will be attended by representatives from 72 nations. Pakistan and Afghanistan have not been invited, but China has been invited.

    “We have invited China,” Sanjay Verma, Secretary of the External Affairs Ministry. However, China’s approval is still pending.

    “In all, 88 organisations are participating,” he said, according to NDTV, “including 15 multilateral organisations such as the FATF and Interpol.”

    The ‘No Money for Terror’ conference will bring together approximately 200 representatives from anti-terrorism organisations from 75 countries, as per News18.

    After two back-to-back conferences – Interpol and the UN Counter-Terrorism Conference – in Mumbai, this is the third in a series of conferences.

    The ministry went on to say that because India has been subjected to various types of terrorism and its financing for more than three decades, it understands the anguish and grief suffered by other countries. In order to demonstrate solidarity with peace-loving nations and to help build a bridge for long-term cooperation on counter-terrorism financing, India hosted two global events in October: the annual General Assembly of Interpol in Delhi and a special session of the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee in Mumbai and Delhi.

    The conference will be inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and participants will debate topics related to terrorism and terror finance.

    The two-day conference will have four sessions, each chaired by a minister.

    “Issues like cryptocurrency and crowdfunding are going to be discussed at length,” a senior official said, according to NDTV.

    He stated that terrorism’s financial backbone must be broken.

    “The funding of terrorist activities often requires funds to be moved within or across jurisdictions. This might be done through official channels of the financial system remittances, or through unregulated channels or use of cash couriers. The informal system remains a preferred channel for terrorist groups because of cost effectiveness, efficiency (speed of transfer), reliability, lack of customer identification checks, lack of transaction records and tax evasion,” he added.

    “Misuse of social media for crowdfunding is common and there is consensus building among countries that it needs to be paid attention,” National Investigation Agecy chief Dinkar Gupta said.

    Security services have provided comprehensive examples of how terror groups around the world are engaging in sectarian conflicts, which are increasingly predicated on ethnic-nationalist and sectarian lines.

    “A substantial number of terrorist attacks continue to be perpetrated by local actors against local targets (state machinery) aimed at achieving local objectives, while certain global terrorist organisations have made a noticeable effort to perpetrate transnational attacks in the South Asian region,” a senior officer said.

    (With inputs from NDTV, News18)


    (We don’t allow anyone to copy content. For Copyright or Use of Content related questions, visit here.)

    To support our Independent Journalism



    [ad_2]
    #Nations #Participate #Money #Terror #Conference #Hosted #India #18th #November