Tag: mistake

  • BJP corrects Congress’ mistake by scrapping Muslim quota in Karnataka: Amit Shah

    BJP corrects Congress’ mistake by scrapping Muslim quota in Karnataka: Amit Shah

    [ad_1]

    Udupi: Lashing out at the Congress in poll-bound Karnataka on Saturday, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) rectified wrong done by Congress by doing away with Muslim reservation quota in Karnataka.

    The Home Minister made the remarks while addressing a gathering in Byndoor.

    Amit Shah said, “BJP has rectified the wrong done by Congress by doing away with the Muslim reservation quota in Karnataka. Congress wants to restore it. Ensure that it is not given this chance; it is unconstitutional as well as compromises the rights of Vokkaligas, Lingayats, SCs, STs and Dalits in the State.”

    MS Education Academy

    “BJP scrapped the 4 per cent Muslim reservation. That reservation was not as per Constitution. Our Constitution does not permit reservation on the basis of religion. Congress says that once their reverse gear government comes, they will bring back the Muslim reservation once again. Do you want that?” questioned Shah.

    Alleging that Congress was incapable of the protection of coastal Karnataka, Amit Shah said, “Only BJP can do the job of securing Coastal Karnataka. Greed for a vote bank, Congress can never ensure the security of Coastal Karnataka. We worked to provide security to fishermen by building a new port in Udupi.”

    “BJP banned the PFI and ensured peace, safety and security for Karnataka,” the Home Minister added.

    Earlier, Amit Shah said that Congress would put the state into “reverse gear”, depriving it of the benefits of “double-engine sarkar”.

    Addressing a rally at the Navalgund Assembly constituency, Shah said, “One hand, there is the Congress under the leadership of Rahul Gandhi and on the other, is the BJP under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi. This (Karnataka Assembly) election is an opportunity for you to decide if you want a double engine sarkar led by PM Modi, which will take Karnataka forward, or the Congress’s reverse gear sarkar, which will take Karnataka backwards.”

    The polls for the 224-seat assembly will take place on May 10 and the counting of votes will be held on May 13.

    [ad_2]
    #BJP #corrects #Congress #mistake #scrapping #Muslim #quota #Karnataka #Amit #Shah

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • People in Pakistan unhappy, believe Partition was mistake, says RSS chief

    People in Pakistan unhappy, believe Partition was mistake, says RSS chief

    [ad_1]

    Bhopal: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat on Friday said people of Pakistan were not happy after more than seven decades of Independence and they now believe the partition of India was a mistake.

    He was speaking at a function to mark the birth anniversary of teen revolutionary Hemu Kalani, which was attended by Sindhis from different parts of the country.

    “It was Bharat before 1947 (Partition). Those who broke off from Bharat, are they happy still? There is pain out there,” Bhagwat said in an apparent reference to Pakistan.

    However, in a reference to the acrimonious relationship the two nations have now, Bhagwat underscored the fact that India did not belong to a culture that calls for attacks on others.

    “I do not mean to say Bharat should attack Pakistan. Not at all. We don’t belong to that culture that calls for attack on others,” he said.

    “We are from the culture that gives a befitting reply in self-defence,” Bhagwat said apparently referring to the surgical strikes on terror camps in that country, adding “we do it and we will keep doing it”.

    “People of Pakistan are now saying the division of Bharat was a mistake. All are saying it was a mistake,” Bhagwat asserted.

    Hailing the Sindhi community, most of who arrived here during Partition, Bhagwat said they had come “from that Bharat to this Bharat for the sake of your rich Sindhu culture and values”.

    [ad_2]
    #People #Pakistan #unhappy #Partition #mistake #RSS #chief

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Opinion | Trump’s Huge Jan. 6 Mistake

    Opinion | Trump’s Huge Jan. 6 Mistake

    [ad_1]

    election 2024 trump 70707

    But there was Trump in Waco, Texas, opening his inaugural rally of the 2024 campaign with a recording of the song “Justice for All” that he performed with the J6 Prison Choir, with some scenes of Jan. 6 playing on the jumbotrons.

    Among those favorably inclined toward it, the bloody riot at the Capitol has progressed from something to be minimized — and blamed on others, whether antifa or federal informants — to closer to something to be celebrated, almost, if not quite, Stop the Steal’s Bastille Day.

    For Trump, a master at appropriating the catch lines and attacks of the other side, reversing the meaning of Jan. 6 would be his most audacious move yet. How long is it before that day, in an echo of the phone call with Volodymyr Zelenskyy that got him impeached, becomes “the perfect protest?”

    This is a huge mistake in every way, most importantly on the merits, but also on the politics.

    Yet Trump’s stance isn’t surprising. He still hews to the two premises of the Jan. 6 riot — that, as a general proposition, the 2020 election was stolen and, more particularly, former Vice President Mike Pence could have stopped the counting of the electoral votes if he weren’t so weak. This is why, in a contradiction, Trump blames Pence for an event that he also portrays as not so bad.

    Trump has talked about pardoning the rioters, who are “great patriots,” and floated the idea of the government apologizing to many of them.

    Now, it is true that the insistence by Democrats and the media on referring to Jan. 6 always and exclusively as “the insurrection” is tiresome and politically motivated. (Insurrection suggests a sustained campaign, whereas this was a one-time spasm of violence more appropriately referred to as a riot.)

    The Justice Department has gone out of its way to run up the number of prosecutions to make a political point about the seriousness of the event, and defendants have been denied bail in a highly unusual manner — if we grant bail to mafia hit men, and we do, we should grant it to someone who punched a cop on Jan. 6.

    And there is a rank hypocrisy in the treatment of political violence. The same people on the left who were willing to look the other way during the “mostly peaceful” riots after the killing of George Floyd are outraged by Jan. 6. (Of course, hypocrisy is a two-way street: If it’s wrong to burn down a gas station in the name of Black Lives Matter, it’s not any better to storm the Capitol in the name of Stop the Steal.)

    All that said, making excuses for or valorizing Jan. 6 is deeply wrong.

    First, there’s the matter of principle. Riots are bad and never justified (except in the rare case when they are a precursor of a just and well-founded act of revolution — for example, the American War for Independence). They hurt people and destroy property, while achieving nothing or setting back the cause they were supposed to advance.

    Disorder at the heart of the U.S. government, disrupting a long-standing ritual connected to the peaceful transfer of power, is particularly egregious.

    Second, justifying or excusing political violence has a deranging influence on the republic. The more reason both sides have to physically fear each other, the easier it is to justify extreme measures in response, in a widening gyre of escalation.

    Third, it’s simply terrible politics. If the other side is desperate to portray you as in bed with fanatics and rioters, it’s best not to go out of your way to prove them right. It’s perverse for Republicans that just as the Jan. 6 Committee has been put out of business and is no longer in a position to constantly remind the public of Jan. 6, here comes Donald Trump to remind people of Jan. 6.

    It’d be a little like Richard Nixon running for the 1976 Republican presidential nomination, and campaigning with a barbershop quartet made up of the Watergate burglars.

    Or Ulysses S. Grant deciding to run for third term while extolling the unappreciated virtues of the organizers of the Whiskey Ring scandal.

    What Trump is doing flies in the face of the lessons of the midterms. Jan. 6 lent emotional power to the Democratic argument that democracy was under threat, and Stop the Steal candidates proved radioactive. Trump wants, in effect, to repeat November 2022’s failed political experiment on a larger scale in 2024.

    On top of his natural inclinations, Trump may be making a calculation that in a primary race with Ron DeSantis to be the most MAGA Republican candidate, he can’t lose by staking out the most pro-Jan. 6 position. That’s not a crazy bet, but if Trump is going to be beaten it will probably be, in part, on grounds that he carries too much baggage and is an electability risk. By embracing rather than skirting one of his major vulnerabilities, he gives his adversaries more ammunition on both counts.

    Jan. 6 is an outrage that shouldn’t become a cause.

    [ad_2]
    #Opinion #Trumps #Huge #Jan #Mistake
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Cheque Bounce New Rule: This small mistake will cause big loss

    [ad_1]


    Never Miss An Update After Joining This Group
    Join Our What’s GroupClick Here


     

    Cheque Bounce Rule: If you also pay through cheque, then it is very important to take care of many things. Otherwise, if the Cheque  bounces, you may have to go to jail along with the fine. Cheque bounce is considered a legal offense in the language of the court. In this, a provision has been made for punishment under the Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881.

    When does a Cheque bounce?

    When a bank rejects a Cheque for some reason and the payment is not made, it is called Cheque bounce. The reason for this happening is mostly due to lack of balance in the account. Apart from this, even if there is a difference in the person’s signature, the bank rejects the cheque.

    Reasons for Cheque bounce

    – Payee’s bank account does not have sufficient funds
    – Signature does not match
    – Account number does not match
    – Cheque issued with date
    – Amount does not match in words and figures
    – Mutilated Cheque
    – overdraft limit

    What happens after a Cheque bounces?

    When the Cheque bounces, the person giving the Cheque has to inform about it. After which he has to pay you within 1 month. In case of not doing so, a legal notice is sent to the person. Even after that, if no reply is given for 15 days, then a case is registered against him under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act 1881. Under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the person can be prosecuted and the Cheque drawer can be punished for up to two years.

    How long is the Cheque period?

    Cheques, bank drafts are currently valid for 3 months from their issue.

    Why are they valid only for 3 months?

    It is common banking practice to dishonor a Cheque older than 3 months. This practice is for the protection of the person who has written the cheque, as there is a possibility that the payment may have been made through some other means or the Cheque may have been lost or stolen.

    Keep these things in mind before issuing a cheque-

    Whenever you give a Cheque to someone, make sure that you have money in your account.
    Apart from this, the person taking the v should get it cashed within three months.
    Whenever you pay someone with a cheque, avoid giving more space between words and figures regarding the name and amount.
    Whenever you sign a bank cheque, remember that you have to sign in the same way as it is already recorded in the records of the concerned bank branch.

    Whenever you pay someone through a bank cheque, make sure to note down the details of the Cheque like Cheque number, account name, amount and date.
    Always issue account payee cheques.
    The signature on the Cheque should be registered with the bank.
    – Fill in the information on the check carefully and correctly.

    53ECF251 50D0 4C4B 929E 16D04D9EDF76

    [ad_2]
    #Cheque #Bounce #Rule #small #mistake #big #loss

    ( With inputs from : kashmirpublication.in )

  • Security Cover To Conman Not Intelligence Failure But A Mistake, says ADGP Kashmir

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: Jammu and Kashmir police Sunday said that providing a security cover and bullet proof vehicle to a Conman from Gujrat who posed himself as a PMO official, was not an intelligence failure but a “mistake” which is being investigated.

    “We don’t provide security cover to anyone on verbal communique or order,” ADGP Kashmir Vijay Kumar told reporters, on the sidelines of a function in Srinagar. He said that a team led by a senior IPS officer raided a hotel and arrested the Conman from Gujrat and recovered fake visiting cards from him. “A proper FIR has been lodged and the Conman was interrogated. At present he is behind the bars under judicial remand,” the ADGP said, adding, the JK police is in touch with the Gujrat police.

    Asked whether providing security cover to Conman was a security lapse and intelligence failure, the ADGP said: “It was not an intelligence failure but yes a mistake for sure which is being investigated,” adding that any officer who ordered for providing security to the Conman will be dealt with.

    About the query about possible rise in the crime rate, he said that there is no surge in the crime rate but there is an increase in reporting the crimes by the people who trust police for its thorough investigations. “Crime cases are being investigated thoroughly and culprits are being arrested and punished as well,” he said.

    On attaching the properties, he said that property used for terrorist activity or used by terrorists for shelter will be attached be that a vehicle, building or a House. (KNO)

    [ad_2]
    #Security #Cover #Conman #Intelligence #Failure #Mistake #ADGP #Kashmir

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Security Cover to Conman: No intelligence failure but a mistake, says ADGP Kashmir Vijay Kumar

    [ad_1]

    Srinagar, Mar 19: Jammu and Kashmir police Sunday said that providing a security cover and bullet proof vehicle to a Conman from Gujrat who posed himself as a PMO official, was not an intelligence failure but a “mistake” which is being investigated.

    “We don’t provide security cover to anyone on verbal communique or order,” ADGP Kashmir Vijay Kumar told reporters, as per news agency—Kashmir News Observer (KNO) on the sidelines of a function in Srinagar. He said that a team led by a senior IPS officer raided a hotel and arrested the Conman from Gujrat and recovered fake visiting cards from him. “A proper FIR has been lodged and the Conman was interrogated. At present he is behind the bars under judicial remand,” the ADGP said.

    He said that J&K police are in touch with the Gujrat police. Asked whether providing security cover to Conman was a security lapse and intelligence failure, the ADGP said: “It was not an intelligence failure but yes a mistake for sure which is being investigated.” He, however, said that any officer who ordered for providing security to the Conman will be dealt with.

    About the query about possible rise in the crime rate, he said that there is no surge in the crime rate but there is an increase in reporting the crimes by the people who trust police for its thorough investigations. “Crime cases are being investigated thoroughly and culprits are being arrested and punished as well,” he said.

    On attaching the properties, he said that property used for terrorist activity or used by terrorists for shelter will be attached be that a vehicle, building or a House—(KNO)

    [ad_2]
    #Security #Cover #Conman #intelligence #failure #mistake #ADGP #Kashmir #Vijay #Kumar

    ( With inputs from : roshankashmir.net )

  • Jake Sullivan: Aiding Russia would be a ‘bad mistake’ for China

    Jake Sullivan: Aiding Russia would be a ‘bad mistake’ for China

    [ad_1]

    aptopix biden us ukraine 00058

    Though Sullivan said he wants to keep messages to China “in the private high-level diplomatic channels that we have established to discuss these issues,” he did say that the war “presents real complications for Beijing,” as the country’s leaders try to balance diplomatic relationships across the world.

    The reports on China’s plans to potentially aid Russia come as Beijing put forth a 12-point peace plan between Russia and Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Friday he is open to considering parts of the proposal, but that China’s words must be followed by actions.

    On Sunday, Sullivan emphasized the importance of a meeting between Chinese and Ukraine leadership.

    “China put forward this plan without having had a single conversation since the war began between President Xi [Jinping] and President Zelenskyy,” Sullivan said during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “The Chinese have talked to the Russians a lot, but at the most senior levels they have not talked to the Ukrainians, and it’s very difficult to advance any kind of peace initiative when there’s that kind of one-sided diplomacy going.”

    Sullivan also dove in to President Joe Biden’s long-awaited decision to send Abrams tanks to Ukraine.

    “[Biden] originally decided against sending [Abrams tanks] because his military told them that they would not be useful on the battlefield in this fight,” Sullivan said in an interview on ABC’s “This Week.”

    What would be useful, Sullivan said, were Germany’s Leopard tanks. But after German officials told the White House they would not send those alone, Biden changed his mind.

    “So, in the interest of alliance unity and to ensure that Ukraine got what it wanted, despite the fact that the Abrams aren’t the tool they need, the president said, ‘OK, I’m going to be the leader of the Free World. I will send Abrams down the road if you send Leopards now.’ Those Leopards are getting sent now,” Sullivan said.

    [ad_2]
    #Jake #Sullivan #Aiding #Russia #bad #mistake #China
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Opinion | Russia Exiled Them. Big Mistake.

    Opinion | Russia Exiled Them. Big Mistake.

    [ad_1]

    Some Putin opponents go further. Gathering outside Warsaw this past November, a group of exiled politicians called the Congress of People’s Deputies of Russia declared that in addition to ending the occupation of Crimea and other Ukrainian territories, Russia must pay reparations to Ukraine — and give up war criminals for trials. (The Congress was led by Ilya Ponomarev, the only member of Russia’s parliament to vote against the annexation of Crimea in 2014; he’s now living in exile in Ukraine.)

    The stakes could not be higher. Another exile organization, the Anti-War Conference of the Free Russia Forum organized by the former world chess champion Garry Kasparov and Mikhail Khodorkovsky, a former political prisoner, has stated that the conflict is not regional, that Putin’s war is not just with Ukraine but with the liberal Western world order. It is a war over the “basic values” of Western democratic civilization.

    Considering their importance to a Russian defeat and a successful outcome of the war, Russia’s political émigrés deserve our support. So far, they have been adept at self-organization and, for the most part, at self-financing. The West’s assistance is needed mostly in lowering or removing bureaucratic barriers. For instance, the U.S. and the EU should be faster at processing temporary year-long visas for political exiles who have found quick but impermanent refuge in countries like Armenia, Georgia, Uzbekistan and Turkey. A recent study by the Center for a New American Security, a Washington-based think tank, also suggests that Western consulates should be more efficient in issuing work permits and refugee identification papers. Germany and the Czech Republic have already begun designating special categories of immigration for such cases to expedite processing.

    Yet the West should avoid arbitrating or taking sides in the inevitable internecine spats within the émigré community. The goal is an opposition that would as closely as possible reflect the diverse segments of the Russian political configuration that are today being flattened under the regime’s deadly weight. Herzen, again, shows the way in seeking to be as inclusive as possible and welcoming all those who were “not dead to human feelings” into “a single vast protest against the evil regime,” as Herzen’s biographer Isaiah Berlin put it.

    Nor should the West impose political tests; there should be only two criteria for acceptance and support of the political émigrés. One is an unconditional affirmation of Russia’s borders as of January 1, 1992. The other is a broad, deep, persistent and patient de-Stalinization and de-imperialization of Russia — cultural, educational, historiographic. Of course, it would be up to the Russians themselves to decide on how to accomplish these mammoth tasks. We can only hope that, resuming where the sincere but fitful glasnost assault on totalitarianism and the Soviet empire left off, a future Russia that’s at peace with its own people and the world would systematically expunge the foundation of the house that Putin built: Russia as a providential power, a “Third Rome” with a special God-given mission in the world; the equation of greatness with fear and terror; the primacy of state over individual; and the cult of violence.

    As in every modern mass migration, the civic-minded among the Russian immigrants — the human rights activists, bloggers, environmentalists and members of the political opposition — are a tiny minority: an estimated 10,000 men and women out of as many as 1.4 million who have left their country since the beginning of Putin’s third presidency in 2012. Yet the scale of their effort to edify and inspire has already by far exceeded their size.

    “We have saved the honor of the Russian name,” Herzen wrote to his fellow self-exile, 19th century writer Ivan Turgenev. That, ultimately, is why Russia’s political émigrés deserve the West’s admiration and its help.

    [ad_2]
    #Opinion #Russia #Exiled #Big #Mistake
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Manchin: It’s a mistake to ‘not negotiate’ with Republicans on debt ceiling

    Manchin: It’s a mistake to ‘not negotiate’ with Republicans on debt ceiling

    [ad_1]

    gettyimages 1245213446

    No date has been set for the Biden-McCarthy meeting.

    “I’m optimistic they will sit down, as this White House always has, and that’s why we were able to accomplish so much in a bipartisan way last Congress. It takes constructive conversation,” Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) said on “Fox News Sunday.” “There’s things that are reasonable on the table, and there are things that are unreasonable. Gutting Social Security and Medicare is on the unreasonable.”

    On the Republican side, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that Biden not negotiating with Republicans is “not how to unify our country.”

    “We are very divided right now. We have $31 trillion of debt. The responsible thing to do would be to get to the table with Republicans and negotiate a way,” Mace said.

    Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) said on “Fox News Sunday” it’s a problem that the Biden administration won’t negotiate with Republicans. It’s “not leadership,” he said.

    House Republicans want a deal that includes spending cuts before raising the debt ceiling, but Biden officials have insisted that Congress pass a clean debt ceiling increase. Democrats have noted that Congress passed three increases on the debt ceiling under former President Donald Trump without demanding spending cuts.

    Manchin said the cuts proposed by Republicans are “not going to happen.”

    “Take that off the board right now and look at ways that we have wasteful spending that we can be held accountable and responsible,” the West Virginia Democrat said.

    Trump issued a warning to Republican lawmakers on Friday, saying that Republicans shouldn’t vote to cut “a single penny” from Medicare or Social Security.

    “It’s ironic,” Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) said on MSNBC, “that Kevin McCarthy and his fellow Republicans in the House are now suddenly discovering that deficit and debt is this important issue, because they’re the same folks who voted to raise the debt ceiling, and never said a word when Donald Trump was adding more to our national debt than any president in our American history.”

    On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said that the U.S. had reached its debt limit and would need to use extraordinary measures to avoid a default. Yellen has projected that Congress has until at least June to pass a debt ceiling increase.

    If the federal government exhausts its use of extraordinary measures for the first time, it could impact Americans who depend on government benefits and “would cause irreparable harm to the U.S. economy, the livelihoods of all Americans, and global financial stability,” Yellen has said.

    [ad_2]
    #Manchin #mistake #negotiate #Republicans #debt #ceiling
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )