Tag: judicial

  • Israeli protest against planned judicial overhaul for 11th week

    Israeli protest against planned judicial overhaul for 11th week

    [ad_1]

    Tel Aviv: Thousands of Israeli protesters participated in nationwide demonstrations that continued for the 11th straight week against the government’s plans to shackle the judiciary, Times of Israel reported.

    The protesters vowed to escalate the demonstrations if the coalition doesn’t halt its legislative proposals, which lawmakers are due to advance next week, declaring this coming Thursday a “national day of paralysis.”

    This weekend’s protest came after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other ministers slapped down President Isaac Herzog’s proposal for an alternative judicial reform.

    Herzog proposed the plans to allow a simple majority of 61 in the 120-seat Knesset to override almost any supreme court rulings and to allow politicians to appoint most of the justices to the bench.

    The changes are spearheaded not by the prime minister but by his Likud colleague Yariv Levin, the justice minister, and the Religious Zionist MK Simcha Rothman, who chairs the Knesset’s law and justice committee, according to Times of Israel.

    “Next week Israel’s government intends to pass the dictatorship and religious coercion law,” protest organizers said in a statement Saturday.

    “Hundreds of people will line up against them like an iron wall and back the High Court and heads of the [judicial] system to stop the coup. Every citizen must come out and take a stand in these fateful moments of the State of Israel. Together, hundreds of thousands will save Israeli democracy,” they added.

    Over 260,000 people demonstrated across the country, including 175,000 in Tel Aviv, 20,000 in Haifa, 4,000 in Netanya, 11,500 in Herzliya, 18,000 in Kfar Saba, and 6,000 in Beersheba, according to a count by company Crowd Solution cited by Channel 13 news.

    Meanwhile, Jacob Frenkel, a former Bank of Israel chief who until recently chaired JP Morgan Chase International, warned that the coalition’s far-reaching plans for overhauling the judicial system are “destroying the Zionist enterprise from within.,” reported Times of Israel.

    In a separate development, at least 4 Palestinians were killed and 23 others were wounded in Jenin on Thursday in the occupied West Bank region, CNN reported citing the Palestinian Authority Health Ministry.

    The Health Ministry stated that five of those injured are in critical condition.

    (Except for the headline, the story has not been edited by Siasat staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



    [ad_2]
    #Israeli #protest #planned #judicial #overhaul #11th #week

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • TSPSC leaks: Telangana BJP chief on one-day hunger strike demanding judicial probe

    TSPSC leaks: Telangana BJP chief on one-day hunger strike demanding judicial probe

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: Telangana Bharatiya Janata Party president Bandi Sanjay Kumar will sit on a day-long hunger strike at the state party headquarters on Friday demanding that the state government order a judicial inquiry by a sitting high court judge into the leakage of the examination paper of the recruitment test conducted by the Telangana State Public Service Commission.

    Sanjay also demanded the immediate sacking of state information technology minister KT Rama Rao from the cabinet, as his IT department had ‘failed to prevent the leakage of the question paper’, besides a complete overhaul of the TSPSC and payment of compensation of Rs 1 lakh to each of the unemployed youth who had suffered due to cancellation of the examination.

    Before commencing the hunger strike, the BJP president would go to the Telangana martyrs’ memorial at Gun Park in front of the state assembly at 10 am to pay homage to the martyrs. “This is to highlight the fact that the K Chandrasekhar Rao government has belittled the sacrifices made by over 1400 youth for the sake of Telangana state,” a press note from BJP said.

    Later, Sanjay would sit on a protest hunger strike from 10.30 am to 2.30 pm at the party office, the party said.

    On Thursday morning, the BJP president went to Chanchalguda Central Prison to call on the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha leaders, who were arrested while protesting at the TSPSC office on Wednesday.

    Speaking to reporters later, Sanjay strongly condemned the lathi-charge and arrest of BJYM state president Bhanu Prakash and others who were doing a ‘peaceful’ protest over the leakage of the TSPSC question paper. “While the accused in the leakage case are being given the royal treatment, those who took part in the protests are subject to harassment,” he alleged.

    The Begum Bazaar police arrested seven activists of Bhartiya Janata Yuva Morcha for rioting and damaging public property at the Telangana State Public Service Commission (TSPSC) during the protest on Tuesday.

    Sanjay sought to know how the question paper was leaked without the knowledge of the TSPSC chairman. “In fact, the TSPSC officials should be prosecuted first. The constitution of an SIT is just a hoax as it would not serve any purpose. Many SITs constituted in the past did not yield any results,” he said.

    Stating that the entire episode was a ‘drama’ enacted by KCR’s son KT Rama Rao, Sanjay wondered why the state government was hesitating to order a judicial probe by a sitting high court judge.

    Stating that the ‘failure’ of KTR is clearly evident in the entire episode, Sanjay said the Information Technology department, headed by KTR had miserably failed to prevent leakage of the question paper. “It is shameless on the part of KTR to say that the BJP has a role in the leakage, on the pretext that one of the arrested Rajasekhar has connections with the BJP,” he said.

    He pointed out that Rajasekhar had been an employee of Telangana State Technology Services, which is part of the IT department headed by KTR. “What is KTR doing instead of identifying such people? He is unfit to be a minister,” he said.

    Sanjay said Rajasekhar had nothing to do with the BJP. “Many people come to me to take selfies. Does it mean I have connections with all of them?” he asked.

    He alleged out that the mastermind behind the question paper leakage Renuka has connections with the Bharat Rashtra Samithi. “Her mother is a sarpanch of BRS. Her brother is a BRS leader. So, for whose benefit the question paper was leaked?” he asked.

    He demanded that all those, including the TSPSC chairman, be sacked and stringent action be taken against them. “The government should conduct recruitment tests as scheduled,” he said.

    [ad_2]
    #TSPSC #leaks #Telangana #BJP #chief #oneday #hunger #strike #demanding #judicial #probe

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Civil disobedience needed if Israel passes judicial changes, former prime minister says

    Civil disobedience needed if Israel passes judicial changes, former prime minister says

    [ad_1]

    israel politics 16292

    Barak, who served as prime minister from 1999 to 2001, appeared on Zakaria’s program with Tzipi Livni, a former Israeli Justice minister and former vice prime minister.

    A former Defense minister and chief of staff of the military, Barak raised the possibility of the Israeli military refusing to accept orders from Netanyahu’s government if it improperly seizes more power.

    “We do not have a contract with a dictatorship and once there is a de-facto dictatorship in Israel, we do not have a contract with them,” he said of the military. (Barak clarified that he was certain soldiers would obey orders if the country’s survival was in jeopardy.)

    Netanyahu’s package of judicial reforms would essentially strip his nation’s Supreme Court of its independence and defang the nation’s courts by making it possible for the government to pass legislation that can’t be reviewed in the courts. Netanyahu and his backers say the legislation is necessary to curb the power of renegade judges.

    Opponents of the measure, some of whom have taken to the streets to protest over the last 10 weeks, insist the legislation could undermine the democratic nature of the country by eliminating safeguards.

    “These are not judicial reforms,” Livni told Zakaria. “It is about changes of the nature of Israel as a democracy.”

    She added: “The politicians in the government and the parliament can legislate, but the Supreme Court could and should supervise human rights.”

    [ad_2]
    #Civil #disobedience #needed #Israel #passes #judicial #prime #minister
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Tenth week in a row, thousands of Israelis protest against judicial reforms

    Tenth week in a row, thousands of Israelis protest against judicial reforms

    [ad_1]

    For the tenth consecutive week, thousands of Israelis protested on Saturday against the judicial reforms that the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu intends to implement.

    The protestors accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of his far-right extremist views, including racism and trying to establish a dictatorship.

    According to Israel TV Channel 12, Tel Aviv saw 1,45,000 protesters while Haifa and Beersheba registered 50,000 and 10,000 respectively. Three demonstrators were arrested by the Tel Aviv police.

    In the early morning, car convoys of protestors drove to Ben Gurion Airport to block land roads for Netanyahu who arrived in Rome by helicopter.

    “It’s not a judicial reform. It’s a revolution that (is) making Israel go to full dictatorship and I want Israel to stay a democracy for my kids,” Tamir Guytsabri, 58, who was one of the protestors.

    Why are Israelis protesting against judicial reforms?

    Netanyahu was elected in November 2022 as the Prime Minister for the sixth time. His cabinet is considered the most extreme, nationalistic, and exclusionary government in Israel’s history.

    From the beginning, the Israeli government sought to make significant changes to the Supreme Court that would remove its independence and power to control the Parliament.

    Several proposed plans would limit the court’s ability to overturn laws it deems unconstitutional, allowing a simple majority of the Knesset to overturn its decisions. It also gives state lawmakers and appointees effective power over the nine-person committee that appoints judges and removes key officials from the attorney general. These and other changes undermine the power of an independent judiciary in an otherwise unchecked parliamentary system.

    The issue has created significant rifts in Israeli society prompting even reservists, the backbone of the Israeli army, to threaten to withdraw from service.



    [ad_2]
    #Tenth #week #row #thousands #Israelis #protest #judicial #reforms

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Liberal groups raise ‘grave concerns’ about Biden judicial pick

    [ad_1]

    120312 michael delaney 605 ap

    The controversy surrounding Delaney’s nomination is unusual for a Biden judicial pick, compounded with further concerns voiced by some Democratic members on the panel. The New Hampshire judicial nominee is under particular scrutiny for his representation of St. Paul’s School in a school sexual assault case. During that case, Delaney filed a motion that would have allowed the plaintiff, who was a minor, to remain anonymous only if she and her representatives agreed not to speak about the case publicly during the litigation.

    The victim in the case, Chessy Prout, went public and a settlement was eventually reached in 2018. Prout recently wrote an op-ed in the Boston Globe encouraging the White House to withdraw Delaney’s nomination. During his confirmation hearing, Delaney said he was an “advocate” for St. Paul’s, and that the school “felt that the request to restrict [Prout’s] lawyers from trying the case in the media was compatible with her desire to proceed with privacy and anonymity.”

    Delaney, a former New Hampshire attorney general, has strong support from his home state Democratic senators, Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan, as well as the White House. Hassan and Shaheen have made the case for his confirmation broadly to their colleagues, including at the caucus lunch this past week.

    Delaney’s allies also highlight support from Susan Carbon, former President Barack Obama’s director of the office on violence against women at the Department of Justice, who wrote that he was “instrumental” in making changes designed “to improve the civil and criminal justice systems for victims of crime” in New Hampshire. Other endorsements include four former New Hampshire Supreme Court justices, appointed by both parties, and 29 past presidents of the New Hampshire Bar Association.

    “The strong support for Michael Delaney from legal experts, survivor advocates and lawmakers spanning the political spectrum speaks to his qualifications, ethics and commitment to justice throughout his nearly thirty-year career,” said Sarah Weinstein, a Shaheen spokesperson. “Senator Shaheen believes that both his record and strong backing from individuals in the advocacy and legal sectors underscore his qualifications.”

    Laura Epstein, a Hassan spokesperson added that “Delaney’s strong, bipartisan support from a wide cross-section of leaders … underscores his deep commitment to justice and why he will make for an excellent First Circuit Judge.”

    White House spokesperson Seth Schuster said the White House “has the utmost respect for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors and expects senators to take Mr. Delaney’s full record into account when considering his nomination — as the White House did before nominating Mr. Delaney to the First Circuit.”

    The Senate Judiciary Committee is slated to take up Delaney’s nomination next week, but that is likely to change depending on attendance. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) has been out of the Senate recovering from shingles. Senate Republicans, meanwhile, have made the school sexual assault case a key focus and are not expected to support his nomination. While no Democrats have come out publicly against Delaney, it’s not clear he has the votes to get through committee.

    [ad_2]
    #Liberal #groups #raise #grave #concerns #Biden #judicial #pick
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Nikki Yadav murder case: Delhi court extends Sahil Gehlot’s judicial custody

    Nikki Yadav murder case: Delhi court extends Sahil Gehlot’s judicial custody

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A Delhi court on Monday extended the judicial custody of Sahil Gehlot, the main accused in the Nikki Yadav murder case, and five others by 14 days.

    Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka courts, Samiksha Gupta extended their judicial custody till March 20.

    The magistrate also allowed family of co-accused Ashish and Lokesh to meet them in the courtroom.

    Appearing for Lokesh, advocate Anirudh Yadav moved an application seeking the marking of the case diary and showed displeasure over manipulation in it.

    The judge listed his application for hearing on March 13.

    On February 20, Gupta had sent five co-accused to 14 days of judicial custody and two days later, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Archana Beniwal sent Gehlot to 12-day judicial custody.

    Four fresh charges were invoked by police under different Sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

    Gehlot’s counsel D.S. Kumar had said that while the FIR was initially registered under Sections 302 (murder) and 201 (causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender) of the IPC, police have now invoked Sections 120 B (criminal conspiracy), 34 (common intention), 202 (intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to inform), and 212 (harbouring offender).

    Gehlot had allegedly strangled 23-year-old Yadav near Kashmiri Gate on February 10 and married another woman on the same day.

    Yadav’s body was found in a fridge at a dhaba, owned by Gehlot, in Mitraon village on the outskirts of Delhi on February 14.

    Gehlot’s father Virender Singh; cousins Naveen (a constable in Delhi Police) and Ashish; and friends Lokesh and Amar are accused of hatching a conspiracy to get rid of Yadav, so he could go ahead with his wedding with another woman.

    According to a senior police official, Gehlot was interrogated at length during police custody and disclosed that Yadav was trying to stop him from marrying someone else as they had already solemnised their marriage in 2020.

    “She was pleading with him not to go ahead with the marriage fixed by his family with another girl on February 10. However, Gehlot along with his father, two cousins, and two friends hatched the conspiracy and planned to remove the deceased from their way,” the official had said.

    “He executed the plan and murdered her and informed other co-accused persons about it on the same day and then all of them went ahead with the marriage ceremony.”

    [ad_2]
    #Nikki #Yadav #murder #case #Delhi #court #extends #Sahil #Gehlots #judicial #custody

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Delhi court sends Sisodia to judicial custody till March 20

    Delhi court sends Sisodia to judicial custody till March 20

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A Delhi court on Monday sent Aam Aadmi Party leader and former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia to judicial custody till March 20 in the alleged liquor policy case being probed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

    Special Judge M.K. Nagpal of Rouse Avenue Courts was hearing the case, who had, on March 4, also extended Sisodia’s CBI custody for two days and listed his bail plea for March 10.

    The counsel appearing for the central agency said that at this stage, they are not seeking further CBI remand but in the next 15 days they might seek it.

    More details are awaited.

    In the last two days, the CBI questioned him with key witnesses — former excise commissioner Arva Gopi Krishna and former excise department secretary C Arvind — in this case, who recorded their statements in front of a magistrate.

    The AAP leader, while addressing the court, had earlier said that the CBI was asking the same questions again and again and it is mental harassment.

    “They are not using third degree. But sitting for eight to nine hours and answering the same questions again and again, that too is mental harassment,” he told the court.

    The court had also directed the CBI to conduct his medical exams at regular intervals.

    The agency arrested Sisodia on February 26 after eight hours of questioning.

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #court #sends #Sisodia #judicial #custody #March

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Dark money and special deals: How Leonard Leo and his friends benefited from his judicial activism

    Dark money and special deals: How Leonard Leo and his friends benefited from his judicial activism

    [ad_1]

    A POLITICO investigation based on dozens of financial, property and public records dating from 2000 to 2021 found that Leo’s lifestyle took a lavish turn beginning in 2016, the year he was tapped as an unpaid adviser to incoming President Donald Trump on Supreme Court justices. It’s the same period during which he erected a for-profit ecosystem around his longtime nonprofit empire that is shielded from taxes. Leo was executive vice president of The Federalist Society at the time.

    The for-profit and nonprofit entities share more than just Leo’s involvement: The same longtime ally managing the books for two of his new leading nonprofits, Neil Corkery, is also chief financial officer of Leo’s for-profit company, POLITICO confirmed in IRS filings. One of those nonprofits paid the for-profit $33.8 million over two years.

    “That’s a classic type of situation the IRS looks into if it appears you [via a nonprofit] are shoveling money to yourself in a for-profit context,” said Philip Hackney, an expert on tax law and charities who worked in the Office of the Chief Counsel at the IRS.

    Leo’s Virginia-based CRC Advisors — a political consulting firm that was created in 2020 and for which he is chairman — declined to say what services it provided for the $43 million payments.

    POLITICO also asked CRC how much of the millions in spending since 2016 by his aligned nonprofits Leo has kept for himself and about concerns by ethics experts that the lack of disclosure underscores the need for greater transparency around the court. Leo did not respond to multiple requests for comment. CRC also did not comment on Corkery’s role.

    “CRC Advisors puts its clients’ money to work more effectively than any other enterprise of its sort and we are blessed to be able to have this kind of impact in our country,” the company said in a statement.

    A web of nonprofits

    The majority of CRC’s payments came through The 85 Fund, a rebranded dark money group that Leo has said he plans to use to fund conservative causes nationwide. Corkery and his wife, Ann, founded and ran the nonprofit under a different name for more than a decade, during which time Leo directed funds toward it. Such nonprofits are exempt from taxes and not required to disclose donors. It is now run by Carrie Severino, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas.

    The official address for The 85 Fund, which has appeared for at least ten years on paperwork registering dark-money groups associated with Leo, is Suite 268 of a building in the Georgetown neighborhood of DC. It houses a UPS store, where an employee said there are no suites, only mailbox rentals.

    Corkery “possesses the organization’s books and records” for The 85 Fund and Leo’s Marble Freedom Trust, which received the $1.6 billion, according to IRS filings. The two groups appear to have no websites, logos or official phone numbers other than Corkery’s in federal filings.

    For more than a decade the Corkerys have also been board members or treasurers of organizations aligned with Leo that spent on campaigns opposing same-sex marriage and abortion rights and promoting judicial appointments.

    CRC did not disclose Corkery’s CFO position in its annual report — which the state requires for “all principal officers” — or in incorporation filings in the state of Virginia. Corkery is listed as a CRC “beneficial owner” in company paperwork filed in Washington DC.

    Both Hackney, the former IRS official, and Marcus Owens, who began working at the IRS under President Gerald Ford and directed the IRS’s division on tax-exempt organizations for a decade under Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, said the broader concern is whether federal tax laws are being abused, and that depends on whether the nonprofits are paying CRC fair market rates for whatever services are rendered.

    “It’s an extraordinary amount of money for a fairly intangible or indistinct product or service,” said Owens.

    “That’s where the big problem is going to lie, in whether the goods and services were real and whether they were provided at no more than fair market value,” said Owens, who helped design and enforce federal programs for exempt organizations. Excess payments can trigger penalties and even revocation of tax exempt status, he said.

    In its 2020 IRS filing, the 85 Fund stated it did not “engage in any excess benefit transaction.”

    Trump’s ‘judge whisperer’

    The payments to CRC over two years from Leo-aligned nonprofits represent an increase over the already significant $15 million a separate Leo for-profit entity, known as BH Group, took in over four years during Supreme court nomination public relations campaigns beginning in 2016.

    The spending by Leo-aligned non-profits on his for-profit businesses coincided with changes in his personal lifestyle and finances. IRS and other public records between 2016 and 2020 show a major expansion of Leo’s personal wealth that coincided with the start of his work for Trump and the creation of his own for-profit entity called BH Group. Both happened in 2016.

    Over the two decades before he became Trump’s “judge whisperer,” Leo had maintained a largely middle-class lifestyle directing one of Washington D.C.’s many nonprofit organizations.

    Since 2016, however, his recent wealth accumulation has included two new mansions in Maine, four new cars, private school tuition for his children, hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations to Catholic causes and a wine buyer and locker at Morton’s Steakhouse, according to POLITICO’s review of public records.

    At least two of Leo’s former Federalist Society colleagues — who were also bringing in hundreds of thousands of dollars from Leo’s aligned groups while working for the society — now work at CRC.

    “If millions of dollars in dark money are sloshing around, it makes it really easy for people on the inside to take a cut,” said Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, a professor and expert on money in politics at Stetson University College of Law. Political consultants for political candidates often reap significant profits. “That behavior is, unfortunately, now showing in the judicial nominating process,” she said.

    “There are all sorts of dimensions in which you could reform the courts, but putting more transparency around the money that’s going into judicial appointments would be a good place to start,” said Torres-Spelliscy.

    There are no campaign finance laws or ethics rules governing the Supreme Court and its nine justices serving lifetime terms. Justices have chosen to make annual disclosures on outside income, though those forms have been criticized for having serious gaps.

    Questions for the Federalist Society

    The court’s 2022 decision overturning half a century of the federal right to abortion was widely seen as a victory for the conservative legal movement led by Leo.

    Trump picked his court nominees from a list drawn up by Leo, who then served as his unofficial adviser in the White House. A constellation of outside groups affiliated with Leo poured tens of millions of dollars in anonymous donor funds into promoting those nominees — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — thereby cementing a new conservative majority for the next generation.

    In its statement, CRC likened itself to political consultants on the left that work with progressive nonprofits and foundations.

    The Federalist Society did not respond to a request for comment. An educational institution that has for decades expressly rejected inserting itself into political campaigns, the Federalist Society remains exempt from taxes because “it is organized exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes,” according to its IRS filings.

    Founded in 1982 as a safe harbor for conservatives in academia, the Federalist Society has fought to preserve its brand as the premier debating society for conservatives, said Steven Teles, a Johns Hopkins University political science professor who authored a book on the rise of the conservative legal movement. Rampant fundraising and political activism have been strictly off limits.

    “Having gone through all of the early history of the Federalist Society, I don’t think anybody looked at this and thought ‘there’s a racket there,’” said Teles. “They wanted to create something that was so high-minded and so principled that, in a way, it would also make dominant liberalism look bad, mainly by showing how much more intellectual they were.”

    Steven Calabresi, Leo’s fellow co-chairman, and President Eugene Meyer have sought to “keep distance” from Leo’s activities, said Teles, including by granting leaves of absence for Leo around his advocacy work, he said. Still, the Federalist Society has become financially intertwined with Leo, receiving $5.6 million in grant money from The 85 Fund in 2020.

    In an interview, Calabresi said he didn’t know anything about Leo’s work beyond the confines of the Federalist Society.

    “I personally don’t believe that Leonard is motivated by greed,” he said. “I think Leonard is motivated by ideology and ideas. I do think he likes to live a high-rolling lifestyle, but I don’t think he’s in the business because of the money.”

    Meyer did not respond to a request for comment.

    Flying too high?

    The 57-year-old Leo has been depicted in news reports as a deeply religious man driven by his personal and spiritual beliefs, mainly his Catholic faith. He attends mass daily. Allies liken him to a philanthropic middle man. But his relatively recent lavish lifestyle illustrates the millions of dollars that helped make a court that’s becoming an epicenter of the nation’s intensifying culture wars.

    Hackney, the former IRS official, said that while there’s no explicit prohibition on conflicts of interest in U.S. tax law, IRS investigations are typically triggered when an individual creates a nonprofit that then pays a for-profit that “makes them very wealthy,” he said.

    Hackney cited the chief executive of the National Rifle Association Wayne LaPierre as a cautionary tale. In 2020, the New York attorney general brought a lawsuit against the NRA alleging LaPierre and others used NRA assets for their own benefit in violation of nonprofit laws. While the case is unlikely to go to trial, the NRA has seen a steep decline in donations and is facing insolvency.

    “He basically flew too close to the sun. That’s the question for Leonard Leo. Is he flying too close to the sun?” said Hackney, now associate professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.

    “In the case of somebody like Leonard Leo, he’s obviously been very successful in what he does, so what you pay him is hard to put a value on,” he said. Also, a key issue in LaPierre’s case is that the NRA board was allegedly presented with false information.

    Leo left his post as executive director of The Federalist Society in 2020 to begin CRC Advisors, though he remains a co-chairman.

    Between 2000 and 2016, Leo earned somewhere between $125,000 and $435,000 annually, according to Federalist Society IRS filings. His wife, Sally, has listed her occupation as “homemaker,” and a review of public records did not find major assets other than his home prior to 2016.

    Before purchasing his McLean, Virginia, home in 2010 with a fixed-rate loan from the Federal Housing Administration, Leo listed a three-bedroom rental apartment in Arlington as his mailing address, according to a 2006 filing with the Federal Election Administration.

    One month after Leo formed his BH Group in 2016, Trump released an updated list of conservative jurists who were suitable candidates for nomination to the Supreme Court that included Neil Gorsuch. Leo was the first person from Trump’s team to reach out to Gorsuch in December of 2016.

    Thereafter, Leo’s personal wealth appears to have skyrocketed in tandem with major victories on the road to an ultraconservative court.

    Weeks after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, in August of 2018, Leo paid off the mortgage on his home in Virginia after making numerous renovations.

    Just months after that — and one day before the Senate took a controversial procedural vote clearing the way for Kavanaugh’s appointment to replace Kennedy — Leo bought a second home, a $3.3 million mansion in Mount Desert, Maine.

    The affluent seaside village is a haven for a number of heirs to Gilded Age oil, industrial and banking barons like the Rockefellers and Morgans. The seller was an heir to chemical giant W.R. Grace chairman and CEO J. Peter Grace.

    It was there he hosted a controversial fundraiser for Sen. Susan Collins, the Maine Republican whose vote for Kavanaugh was considered decisive. A year later, on July 3, 2019 — and about a month after the Washington Post first revealed the 11-bedroom mansion’s existence — that mortgage too was paid in full, according to a lien discharge record. Following apparent improvements, the home was assessed for $4.4 million in 2022.

    Meanwhile, in 2021, the same P.O. Box used to purchase Leo’s first mansion was used to buy another home about a mile away in Mount Desert for $1.65 million. This one was purchased from an heir to the financier and philanthropist Richard K. Mellon.

    During that same period, Leo and his wife, Sally, became “Stewards of Saint Peter,” a designation given to those pledging more than $1 million to Vatican initiatives, sponsored events and made multiple additional donations ranging from $10,000 to $75,000 to Catholic charitable causes and $75,000 to a COVID relief fund in Maine.

    Leo also acquired a wine locker at Morton’s Steakhouse and hired the chief steward at the Trump International Hotel as his wine buyer, according to the book, “Supreme Ambition.”

    A widening circle of friends

    Leo has maintained close ties to at least one Supreme Court justice, Clarence Thomas. During a 2017 award ceremony, Thomas’s wife, Virginia, gave Leo an award and called him “a mentor” during a ceremony at Trump Hotel.

    “He has many hats … he doesn’t really tell all that he does,” said Thomas, though Leo is “an amazing cook, he knows food and wine.”

    Justices are not subject to the same conflict of interest rules as members of Congress, the executive branch and other U.S. judges.

    But Leo’s close relationship with the Thomases raises questions about his access to other justices he campaigned for, now that they are issuing the rulings his donors desire, said Kyle Herrig, president of Accountable.US, a non-partisan progressive group that investigates corporate influence in politics.

    Many of Leo’s closest associates have also taken in significant sums from his network, in many cases via their own self-run entities.

    Leo’s friend Ronald Cass — Leo was best man at his wedding — is listed along with his wife as the sole officer of The Center for the Rule of Law, a nonprofit registered to their home address.

    The nonprofit, which was created in 2006 and described as an independent “center of international scholars analyzing rule of law issues,” doesn’t have much of a footprint. The only website that purports to represent it — it contains a “chairman’s statement” from Cass and is cited in at least one university law journal — appears to either be inactive or hacked, given a series of links at the bottom of the page to erotic websites. Cass is also president of his own legal consulting business, Cass & Associates, PC in Virginia.

    Cass’s group received $2.9 million between 2017 and 2019 from Leo’s 85 Fund for consulting, according to IRS filings. The main evidence of work Cass’s group did for The 85 Fund is a 2016 amicus brief in an immigration-related case. During Gorsuch’s nomination process, Cass also authored newspaper columns pressing for his confirmation.

    Cass and his wife, Susan, did not respond to two emailed requests for information on what consulting services were provided.

    Leo associates also made significant money while still working full time for the nonprofit Federalist Society.

    Maria Marshall, previously Leo’s director of operations at the Federalist Society and a former scheduling director for Collins, is listed as the sole officer of YAS LLC, which is registered in Washington and received $775,000 over three years from the Leo-connected Rule of Law Trust while Marshall worked at the Federalist Society.

    CRC Advisors president Jonathan Bunch received $1.54 million for “consulting” for the Rule of Law Trust in 2018, the same year the Federalist Society listed him as working 40 hours a week with a salary of $156,625, according to the group’s IRS filing. Both Bunch and Marshall, who joined Leo’s CRC Advisors fulltime in 2020, did not respond to requests for comment on these side businesses.

    On the second day of hearings to confirm Justice Amy Coney Barrett in October of 2020, Bunch closed on a $1.285 million waterfront home on the Chesapeake Bay.

    The wealth accumulation of Leo and a small circle of associates shows how they benefited from the making of the court’s current conservative majority, said Herrig.

    “His lifestyle upgrade was made possible by using his network of nonprofits to pour money into his for profit consulting firm,” he said. “This raises serious questions about how he will spend the $1.6 billion from a rightwing billionaire.”

    [ad_2]
    #Dark #money #special #deals #Leonard #Leo #friends #benefited #judicial #activism
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • For 8th week, mass protests in Israel against judicial reforms

    For 8th week, mass protests in Israel against judicial reforms

    [ad_1]

    Jerusalem: For the eighth week in a row, tens of thousands of Israelis are demonstrating against the government and its judicial reforms.

    According to Israeli media outlets, more than 100,000 Israelis are protesting around the country, with the main demonstration being held in Tel Aviv, 25,000 rallying in the northern city of Haifa and thousands gathering in front of the president’s residence in Jerusalem. There is even one in front of the house of Justice Minister Yariv Levin in the central city of Modiin, Xinhua news agency reported.

    The protests are against the major overhaul of the judicial system, which was set in motion on February 13 when the administration initiated the legislative procedure for the reforms. The Israeli parliament has passed the first out of three readings of several relevant bills.

    One of the bills is the “override clause” which will allow the parliament to override supreme court rulings with a simple majority. Another one would change the composition of the committee that appoints supreme court judges by giving the government a majority. A third aims to block the supreme court from reviewing the basic laws already passed by the parliament.

    Demonstrators say the reforms will weaken the courts and give the ruling coalition unrestrained power.

    The coalition led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said it aims to complete the legislative process until April. With a solid majority in the parliament, the votes are expected to pass without major contention.

    Massive demonstrations are also planned for Wednesday when the coalition will continue to promote the legislation in parliament. The parliament is also slated to debate a bill that would prevent the state’s attorney general from declaring the prime minister incapacitated except for legitimate medical reasons.

    According to Israeli media, Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara said earlier this month that Netanyahu cannot be involved in his government’s judicial reforms because he has a conflict of interests because of his ongoing corruption trial.

    Netanyahu and his partners say the reforms are necessary in terms of limiting the judicial system which has become too powerful in recent decades and often intervenes in political issues that should be determined by the parliament, vowing to push forward with the reforms despite protests.

    The Israeli prime minister also denies that the reforms are personally motivated to allow him to influence the outcome of his trial.

    (Except for the headline, the story has not been edited by Siasat staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



    [ad_2]
    #8th #week #mass #protests #Israel #judicial #reforms

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • TDP spokesman, 13 others sent to judicial custody

    TDP spokesman, 13 others sent to judicial custody

    [ad_1]

    Vijayawada: A court in Andhra Pradesh’s Gannavaram on Tuesday sent Telugu Desam Party (TDP) national spokesperson Kommareddy Pattabhiram and 13 other leaders to judicial custody for 14 days in a case of alleged attempt to murder.

    Pattabhiram, Dontu Chinna, Gurumurthy and others, arrested by police at Gannavaram on Monday, were produced before a junior civil judge court.

    Pattabhiram complained to the judge that he was beaten up by three masked men in Thotlavalluru police station. He alleged that third degree methods were used against him at the police station.

    After hearing both sides, the judge sent the accused to judicial custody. He also issued orders for a medical examination of Pattabhiram.

    The TDP leaders were booked for attempt to murder and under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on a complaint by Gannavaram Circle Inspector Kanaka Rao. The police official alleged that by provoking TDP workers, the accused tried to endanger his life.

    The arrests were made when TDP leaders had gone to TDP office at Gannavaram after it was attacked by supporters of local MLA Vallabhaneni Vamsi of ruling YSR Congress Party (YSRCP).

    The attackers had set ablaze a car in the office premises and ransacked furniture.

    The TDP has condemned the attack and the arrest of its leaders. The opposition party said that instead of taking action against the guilty, police have arrested its leaders who had gone to the office after learning about the attack.

    Earlier, Pattabhiram’s wife Chandana had threatened to sit on an indefinite hunger strike in front of the Director General of Police’s office to demand information about his whereabouts.

    Several TDP leaders were placed under house arrest in the morning as the party had given a call for ‘Chalo Gannavaram’ to protest the attack on its office.

    [ad_2]
    #TDP #spokesman #judicial #custody

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )