Tag: journalism

  • Kashmiri Journalist Shines, Wins Prestigious Fetisov Award

    Kashmiri Journalist Shines, Wins Prestigious Fetisov Award

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: Kashmiri women journalist Safina Nabi on April 22, 2023 won the prestigious Fetisov Journalism Award for her article published on Scroll about how countless women in Kashmir, whose husbands disappeared and could never be traced, have been cut out of inheritances and left to fend for themselves.

    WhatsApp Image 2023 05 09 at 3.00.48 PM e1683625459252
    Safina Nabi Wins Fetisov Award at Dubai on April 22, 2023

    Nabi won the second prize in the “Outstanding Contribution to Peace” category, and the Fetisov Journalism Awards praised her reporting for providing a “comprehensive and impressively detailed picture” of the issue.

    According to a press release from the awards, Nabi’s story “highlights what is not known, shows the human consequences of neglect, and most emphatically gives voice to the people totally disregarded by their own authorities and whose ordeal is largely invisible to international audiences.”

    The Fetisov Journalism Awards have four categories in total, and each winner in the three categories shares a cash prize of 130,000 Swiss francs (Rs 11, 94,371).

    Nabi’s award-winning reporting brings attention to an often-overlooked issue and highlights the struggles faced by “half-widows” in Kashmir, whose stories are often ignored.

    [ad_2]
    #Kashmiri #Journalist #Shines #Wins #Prestigious #Fetisov #Award

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • ‘Journalism is not a crime’: Biden salutes press, stresses freedoms at WHCD

    ‘Journalism is not a crime’: Biden salutes press, stresses freedoms at WHCD

    [ad_1]

    biden correspondents dinner 94216

    “Tonight our message is this: journalism is not a crime,” Biden told the applauding crowd.

    The president also acknowledged dinner attendee and WNBA star Brittney Griner, who was detained in Russia for nearly 10 months, and Debra Tice, the mother of Austin Tice, a journalist who has been held captive in Syria for more than 10 years.

    “Evan and Austin should be released immediately, along with every American held hostage or wrongfully detained abroad,” Biden urged. He also acknowledged Paul Whelan, the former U.S. marine currently detained in Russia, and promised Whelan’s family that neither he nor his administration would quit until Whelan was freed.

    Biden eventually cut the somber atmosphere with a joke about his own age. “I believe in the First Amendment. Not just because my good friend Jimmy Madison wrote it,” the 80-year-old said to laughter from the crowd.

    Biden’s speech included some of his favorite lines — “don’t compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative,” — peppered with digs at Republicans and the media, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, former Fox host Tucker Carlson, former CNN host Don Lemon and Twitter CEO Elon Musk.

    Biden also had some barbs for Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

    “You all keep recording my approval rating is 42%. I think you don’t know this. Kevin McCarthy called me and asked, ‘Joe, what the hell is your secret?’” Biden said.

    The White House Correspondents’ Dinner was back to its glitzy, elbow-rubbing glory this year for the first time since the Covid-19 pandemic began. The annual roast was canceled in 2020 and 2021, and the virus continued to cast a shadow over last year’s event, after the Gridiron Club dinner weeks earlier turned out to be a superspreader event.

    But on Saturday, not even the threat of rainy weather could deter the crowd – some 2,600 journalists, politicians and celebrities filed into the ballroom at the Washington Hilton for the celebration, keynoted by comedian and “Daily Show” correspondent Roy Wood, Jr. The dinner got off to a rowdy start, as White House Correspondents’ Association President Tamara Keith tried to rein in attendees’ attention. “Don’t make me shout out, ‘Decorum!” Keith said in an effort to quiet the room for her opening remarks.

    The awards and speech portion of the night opened with a video of actor and former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who spoke of the importance of the relationship between politicians and the press.

    “Tonight’s event of course sends a powerful message that you don’t see politicians schmoozing and drinking with the press in Beijing or in Moscow or places like that — no, not at all,” Schwarzenegger said in the pre-taped recording, which included a cameo from actor Danny DeVito. “So even though you have asked questions that have annoyed the hell out of me, I remind myself always that you actually do the people’s work. You are the ally of the people, so never ever stop shining a light on the truth and informing the public.”

    Keith emphasized that message in her remarks, noting that this was the first time in many years that both the president and the vice president attended the event, after former President Donald Trump declined to join during his time in office.

    “Their presence is a statement and endorsement of the importance of a free and independent press — even if they don’t always like the questions we ask, or the way we ask them,” Keith said.

    Keith also acknowledged the slew of recent media layoffs, including at her own company. “This is a challenging time for the news industry. My employer, NPR, just went through a painful round of layoffs and we are not alone. ABC, BuzzFeed, CBS, CNN, Gannett, Insider, Vice News Tonight, the Washington Post — I had to alphabetize the list because it’s so long,” Keith said. “These are difficult times in our industry. There is uncertainty and fear for what the future holds. But we are still here, so let’s stand proud,” she added later.

    Wood later wrapped up the evening’s theme in his inimitable style: “Tonight is all about you all, journalists, the defenders of free speech. People who show truth to the world, from different mediums, from television, print, radio, whatever China let us see on TikTok.”

    [ad_2]
    #Journalism #crime #Biden #salutes #press #stresses #freedoms #WHCD
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Journalism is a tool of democracy, was proved by CJI at Ram Nath Goenka Awards

    Journalism is a tool of democracy, was proved by CJI at Ram Nath Goenka Awards

    [ad_1]

    Journalism is a tool of democracy. While I had gone to attend the annual Ram Nath Goenka Awards for the journalists, I thought that it would be just like another five star elitist function as per the Persian idiom, “Nashistan, do guftan, khurdan, v barkhastan, meaning, “Meeting, discussing, eating and finally departing! It wasn’t that, at least for me, it was a day of reckoning! Nevertheless, the kind of inimitable topics for which the scribes were chosen, did confirm that this was just the address on the envelope and much was in store for the eager visitors, all very prominent people in the form of the addresses by Justice DY Chandrachud and Raj Kamal Jha, The Indian Express editor! For example, the bare youth, Tarun Rawat, the shutterbug of the Times of India, who had shot the pistol-shot of a man during the Jamia Millia Islamia CAA protests, walked away with the covetous award! All the 43 odd awards were for unique dedication and devotion of the pen smiths and shutterbugs, with reportages with even at the cost of their lives for bringing truth to the world.

    A full to capacity, Kamal Mahal of ITC Maurya Hotel in Chanakyapuri, was bubbling with intellectuals and scholars from all walks of life, eagerly waiting for the propitious moment, when Justice Chandrachud would address the gathering and I vouch, he took the floor with words pouring out of his mouth like petals of fragrant flowers of all hues amidst non-stop clapping! Since the day he has sat on the seat of judgment, people’s faith has been restored in the cliché, “Justice dawns from Heaven,” owing to his bold and brave judgments daring into the eyes of the top notch managers of the present governance!

    The real soul-stirring and churning time came, when the Chief Justice of the Apex Court, Justice DY Chandrachud and Raj Kamal Jha took charge. Both of them delivered the treatises that reminded me of a similar struggle faced India’s highly revered Freedom fighter, first minister of education and Bharat Ratna, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, about whom, once in a 2005 PIL by me, for opening the locks of Maulana Azad mausoleum near Jama Masjid, mostly occupied by anti-social elements indulging in consuming smack and marijuana, Justice Vijendra Jain, in the High Court of Delhi (court No. 6), to my astonishment and of course, joy, had stated in his Order that the sacrifices of Maulana Azad for the freedom of India were even greater than those of Mahatama Gandhi and Pandit Nehru! This great statesman of India too had suffered a lot both as a journalist and editor as he was jailed many times for building bridges between Hindus and Muslims against the English perpetrators and his weekly Urdu newspapers, Al-Hilal and Al-Balagh, that were sold like hot cakes, the moment they were on the stands in markets, like The Indian Express today, were closed down by the English.

    Abul Kalam Azad who was a great Indian nationalist and patriot, criticized the British for racial discrimination and ignoring the needs of the common Indians plus the Muslim politicians who held communal views to support the demand of the All India Muslim League for the vivisection of India on communal lines. Azad furiously opposed the division of Bengal in 1905 which was against the national integration of India.

    A year after the publication of the last issue of Al-Hilal on 18th November 18, 1914, Maulana Azad brought out another weekly Al-Balagh. It was apparently confined to religious issues but in essence it was discussing the broader issues of man’s emancipation and freedom in the Islamic and Indian historical context. In this paper Azad was discussing religious issues with political overtones for uniting Hindus and Muslims. The colonial administration found it unbearable and Maulana Azad was finally detained at Ranchi where he remained for the next few years. When he came out in 1919 the entire political scenario had changed. There was complete Hindu-Muslim unity and mass upsurge against the British, which finally resulted in the non-cooperation movement started by Gandhi on August 1, 1920.

    Nobody can forget Arun Shourie, the former editor of The Indian Express,who, during the infamous Emergency during 1975-76, put his foot down, and had the temerity never to buckle under pressure during those trying and testing days while I was in class 10, witnessing some havocs perpetrated by the arrogant government of that time with my own eyes, the embers of at least one of them are still smoldering, I mean the, demolished Urdu medium Qaumi Senior Secondary School, razed to the ground on June 30, 1976 for which as well, a PIL was filed by the author where Justice Geeta Mittal, in a historic landmark judgment, had allotted 4000 meters of land for building a designer, state of the art and exemplary school for the poor walled city Muslim students. It’s another thing that in collusion with the DDA and other agencies, meant for allotting the land, 2400 meters has been illegally annexed that raises the eyebrows at the Constitutional body like these Delhi High Court. How the said court allowed only 1600 meters for building a senior secondary school when as per the Delhi Education Act, not less than 4000 meters is required. Lamentably, the land is available in that campus but has been given for the parking lot. This too will be brought to the notice of the “North Star”!

    The historic session also reminded me of the travails faced by India’s highly revered Freedom fighter, first minister of education and Bharat Ratna, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, about whom, once in a case for opening the locks of Maulana Azad mausoleum near Jama Masjid, mostly occupied by anti-social elements indulging in consuming smack and marijuana, in the High Court of Delhi, court No. 6, Justice Vijendra Jain, to my astonishment and of course, joy, had stated in his Order in 2005 that the sacrifices of Maulana Azad for the freedom of India were even greater than those of Mahatama Gandhi and Pandit Nehru! This great statesman of India too had suffered a lot both as a journalist and editor as he was jailed many times for building bridges between Hindus and Muslims against the English perpetrators and his weekly Urdu newspapers, Al-Hilal and Al-Balagh, that were sold like hot cakes, the moment they were on the stands in markets, like The Indian Express today, were closed down by the English.

    Clubbing the similarity in the professions of law and journalism, Chandrachud stated that persons of both professions are fierce believers of the aphorism that the pen is mightier than the sword. Simultaneously, they also share the occupational hazard of being disliked by virtue of their professions — no easy cross to bear. Nevertheless, trusting the tough path of honesty, members of both professions carry on calling a spade a spade with the hope that one day, the reputations of their professions will receive a makeover.

    This session, that was a defining moment of my life, in which, I identified myself with the golden words of wisdom and truth by the Chief Justice of India and The Indian Express editor, personally confirmed one thing that sans all shady profiteering and promotion, honesty, uprightness, rectitude and calling a spade a spade, are the lifelong paradigms. As the chancellor at Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad where I found the rambling financial corruption, rampant nepotism, continuous scams, gender discrimination, heinous sexual harassment of ladies working in the campus and girl-students, no regard for Constitution, illegal appointments galore, ambience of fear psychosis for students, being a journalist and a whistle blower, I raised my voice and write about it, only to be told by the so-called “worldly wise” people that I had closed all my avenues for further uplift but I didn’t waver. I found that the entire system was rotten and nobody was concerned, including the top notch officers of the ministries of Education and Social Justice and Empowerment. Truth is that legal journalism is the storyteller of the justice system, shedding light on the complexities of the law.

    Very truly, Raj Kamal Jha too pointed out the similar excesses when he said that for journalists and journalism, year after year, case after case, their starlight has illuminated the road and added that in case of the dimming of lights, when a reporter is arrested under a law meant for terrorists, when another is arrested for asking a question, when a university teacher is picked up for sharing a cartoon, a college student for a speech, a film star for a comment, or when a rejoinder to a story comes in the form of a police FIR, the only resort was the “North Star” (Supreme Court).

    Finally, Justice Chandrachud words took us back to the August 11, 1912 issue of Al-Hilal where the similar views are published by Azad, the editor, that the media is the fourth pillar in the establishment of the State, and thus an integral component of democracy. A vibrant democracy must encourage space for equanimity with dissent. The vivacity of any democracy is bargained when the press is not allowed to ask questions. The press must remain free if a country is to remain a pulsating democracy. Of course, nothing should be in closed and concealed envelopes!

    [ad_2]
    #Journalism #tool #democracy #proved #CJI #Ram #Nath #Goenka #Awards

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • I recently became a mom. It changed the way I view journalism

    I recently became a mom. It changed the way I view journalism

    [ad_1]

    The week I came back to work after parental leave, my daughter decided she didn’t want to sleep. My husband was on a work trip, and I was waking up every hour and a half to go through the long list of things she could possibly need – whether it was milk, a diaper change, a cuddle or an extra layer of clothing.

    On the third morning, I found myself attempting to run our early breaking news operation while feeding my five-month-old, desperately in need of a shower and coffee. My mother, who had come to help for a few days, waited to take over.

    This was not the hard part, but it was the bleary-eyed setting for which the hard part would come.

    Days before I returned to work, the Ukraine war had begun. The week I sat at my desk for the first time in months, photos of children’s bodies in Bucha flooded my screen. Still raw from the physical wounds of birth and the emotional rollercoaster of learning to keep my baby alive, I worked through tears as I figured out which newswires we would run, which stories should take precedence, and whose suffering mattered most that day.

    It’s different as a mother, I knew instantly. I’ve always been sensitive – soft, even – in the face of my work. Interviews replay in my mind for months; writing difficult stories sends me into a dark place. And yet, though empathy is not specific to parents, this is my new, fresh layer of vulnerability. I think of children lost to war, children lost to viruses, children lost to mass shootings, children who became adults and then were lost to police violence. Then I think of the mothers – mothers who spent those harrowing hours bringing children into this world and then lost them.

    In my new world, I see every photo or video and think: someone worked so hard to keep this person alive. Someone woke up every hour to feed this baby, to soothe her to sleep, to watch her every breath when she had her first fever. It doesn’t matter where the child was born, or to whom. When Tyre Nichols was killed, my husband sent me an article about his last moments. “I think it’s profound that in so many of these situations, people are calling out for their moms,” he said. I pictured his mother, RowVaughn Wells, and thought: I’m so sorry you couldn’t get to your baby.

    Science and lore both claim that a mother’s brain is physically changed when she has a baby. The amygdala becomes attuned to your baby’s needs, and the crying is louder, the affection stronger, the smell of your baby sweeter. This new brain activity, along with – for lack of a better term – raging hormones, created a new self, a new me. My body was always ready to react, to jump up and run to her side. Instead of savoring a few hours of sleep, I would stay awake looking up things that could go wrong and how to avoid them.

    people gather at candlight vigil
    Family and friends of Tyre Nichols remember him in Sacramento last month. Photograph: Paul Kitagaki Jr/Zuma Press Wire/Rex/Shutterstock

    Less clear is how your brain reacts to other people’s children, but some data shows that a parent’s new empathy for their baby extends to external stimuli as well. We also know that humans tend to extend their empathy to people they can relate to – whether it’s people who have undergone similar experiences, or those who look or seem more like them.

    This seems self-serving – that we care more about people who remind us of us. But the science belies a more universal truth. “There is no hierarchy of suffering,” the psychologist and Holocaust survivor Edith Eger is known for saying. I believe there is another layer: there is no hierarchy of empathy. Being a mother does not make me inherently more empathetic than someone who didn’t give birth, nor does it mean I somehow know how to act in the face of the pain that so acutely affects me now. There are different angles from which we access the empathy we apply to the world.

    Within the context of my own life, this is now mine: I witness the brutality of the daily news cycle against the soft and warm sweetness of my now toddler’s bedtime ritual.

    As I edit a news story about Nichols, read the news about teenagers losing their lives to gun violence in my city, or plan an article about lawmakers choosing not to give families with poor children money, I wonder what to do with the way I now look at the world. Does it mean these stories of loss and suffering are too sharp and painful to be cast on thousands of people every morning, or that we need to spend more time with more people, attempting to capture their life piece by piece, in the public eye? Does it mean that I should do what many of my friends outside the media world tell me they’ve started doing – stop watching the news?

    For now, 15 months after becoming a parent, I’ve chosen not to decide, and let myself be changed. I know there may not be any benefit to feeling everything, but it’s certainly better than feeling nothing. And eventually, maybe I can share this with my daughter and tell her that bringing her into the world taught me more about the work I do, the humanity I aim to distill into words, than perhaps anything else I’ve done.

    [ad_2]
    #mom #changed #view #journalism
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )