Tag: Honest

  • Biden calls McCarthy ‘honest’ and himself wise as debt ceiling talks heat up

    Biden calls McCarthy ‘honest’ and himself wise as debt ceiling talks heat up

    [ad_1]

    biden 29934

    Biden declined the chance to take a personal jab at House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, choosing instead to call him an “honest man.” The two have negotiated formally just once, though McCarthy has been pushing for a followup, and Biden will meet with him and the three other main congressional leaders next week. Instead of teeing off on the speaker, Biden criticized the deal McCarthy cut with his fellow House Republicans to get a debt ceiling hike through their chamber.

    “I think he’s in the position, well, he had to make a deal and that was pretty — you know, 15 votes. Fifteen votes that where he had — just about sold away everything that he — at the far, far right,” he said. “There’s the Republican Party and there’s the MAGA Republicans, and the MAGA Republicans really have put him in a position where in order to stay speaker he has to agree — he’s agreed to things that, maybe he believes, but are just extreme.”

    No workarounds… yet

    The president said he wasn’t ready to try a workaround for raising the debt ceiling, at least not yet. Pressed by Ruhle as to whether he would argue that the debt limit was unconstitutional (as his aides are reportedly considering), he said he had not “gotten there yet.”

    “Here’s the deal, I think that — first of all, this is not your father’s Republican Party. This is a different group. And I think that we have to make it clear to the American people that I am prepared to negotiate in detail with their budget,” he said. “How much are you going to spend? How much are you going to tax? Where can we cut?”

    Age is but a number

    It wasn’t all budget and debt talk. Ruhle also pressed Biden about running for a second term when he would be nearly 82 at his reelection. She noted that no one at a Fortune 500 company would consider hiring a CEO at that age. So why, she asked, would voters give him a job?

    “Because I have acquired a hell of a lot of wisdom and know more than the vast majority of people,” said Biden. “And I’m more experienced than anybody that’s ever run for the office. And I think I’ve proven myself to be honorable as well as also effective.”

    All the president’s troops

    Biden has faced criticism — from both the right and left — for his administration’s decision to send 1,500 active-duty troops to the southern border ahead of next week’s lifting of the Trump-era health policy known as Title 42. Biden defended the move in the interview, saying more resources are needed to address the influx of migrants and that he has sought help from Congress.

    “We’re in a situation now where those 1,500 [troops] at the border, they’re not there to enforce the law, they’re there to free up the border agents that need to be on the border,” Biden said. “And we’re having another thousand people coming in. There are asylum judges to make judgments, to move things along.”

    To Hunter’s defense

    The president’s son, Hunter Biden, has been embroiled in legal problems. Prosecutors are reportedly close to determining whether the younger Biden will be charged with gun and tax violations, and his defense team has reportedly met with prosecutors.

    Biden argued to Ruhle that any federal charges filed against Hunter would not affect his presidency.

    “It will not because he has done nothing wrong. And I’m proud of him,” he said.

    Beat the Press

    When Ruhle pointed out that “sentiment in this country … is not very good,” Biden complained of the negative coverage in the press.

    “All they’ve heard is negative news for years,” he said. “Everything is negative. And I’m not being critical of the press. If you turn on the television, the only way you’re going to get a hit is if there’s something negative.”

    2020 rematch?

    When asked about his past remarks about the “soul of America,” Biden took the opportunity to take a jab at former President Donald Trump, whom he defeated in 2020 — and who currently leads in Republican primary polls. But Biden did not identify Trump by name.

    “We can’t let — we cannot let this election be one where the same man who was president four years ago becomes president again,” he said.

    [ad_2]
    #Biden #calls #McCarthy #honest #wise #debt #ceiling #talks #heat
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • If I am corrupt, no one in world is honest: CM Kejriwal

    If I am corrupt, no one in world is honest: CM Kejriwal

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Saturday said he will appear before the CBI in the excise policy case and asserted that if he was “corrupt” then no one in the world was “honest”.

    Addressing a press conference here over the CBI summons to him in the excise policy case, he claimed that BJP leaders were demanding his arrest and that if the saffron party had “ordered” the probe agency to arrest him, it cannot refuse to do so.

    The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has summoned the AAP leader in connection with the case on Sunday. He has been asked to be present at the agency headquarters at 11 am to answer queries of the investigating team, officials said.

    MS Education Academy

    The central probe agency has already arrested former Delhi deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia in connection with the case.

    It is alleged that the Delhi government’s excise policy for 2021-22 to grant licences to liquor traders favoured certain dealers who had allegedly paid bribes for it, a charge strongly refuted by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The policy was later scrapped.

    Kejriwal also attacked Prime Minister Narendra Modi, levelling allegations of corruption against him.

    “How can corruption be an issue for such a person who is submerged in corruption from head to toe,” he said and cited the charges levelled against Modi by former Jammu and Kashmir Governor Satyapal Malik.

    “I want to say to Modiji if Kejriwal is a thief or corrupt, then there isn’t a single honest man in this world,” he asserted.

    Kejriwal said no party in the 75-year history of independent India had been targetted like the AAP because it has given hope to people which no other party has been able to do so far.

    “The AAP has given hope to people that it can eradicate poverty, provide education and employment to their children. The prime minister wants to crush this hope,” he said.

    In 30 years of the BJP rule in Gujarat, in which Modi was the chief minister for 12 years, the condition of not a single school could be improved, while the AAP government in Delhi turned around the government schools in five years, he said.

    “A temporary classroom had to be set up when the prime minister visited a school in Gujarat…,” Kejriwal quipped.

    He said the BJP was trying to corner the AAP and it first sent the party’s “number 2 and number 3” (Manish Sisodia and Satyendar Jain) leaders behind the bars and now they wanted to catch hold of him.

    “The issue is not corruption or liquor scam. How could it be for a person who is submerged in corruption? I had cited various instances of corruption in my speech at Delhi Assembly in March and I got a call from Sanjay Singh (party MP) that I was next,” said the AAP supremo.

    Batting for the now scrapped Excise Policy 2021-22 of his government, Kejriwal said it could have ended corruption.

    “The same policy has led to a 50 per cent rise in revenue in the last year,” he claimed.

    Kejriwal alleged torture and threats to those arrested by the central agencies in connection with the liquor scam probe.

    “I want to ask the prime minister what is going on. They catch anyone and then torture them to name Kejriwal or Sisodia. That is their probe,” he said.

    Kejriwal alleged that the CBI and the ED “lied” in court that Sisodia destroyed 14 mobile phones to hide evidence.

    “The seizure memo of ED shows that it has four of the 14 phones, while one was with the CBI. Our own investigation has revealed that the remaining nine phones (numbers) were active and being used by persons like AAP volunteers,” he claimed.

    Later in a tweet, Kejriwal said, “We will file appropriate cases against the CBI and the ED officials for perjury and producing false evidence in courts.”

    Kejriwal further said it has been alleged that a bribe of Rs 100 crore was taken, but asked where was the money.

    “More than 400 raids were conducted…where is the money? It was said that the money was used in the Goa elections. They questioned every Goa vendor whom we had employed, but could not find anything,” he asserted.

    Every transaction in question had taken place through cheques and was duly reported to the Election Commission, he said.

    “When no bribe has been taken, there is no way on earth for these agencies to find any money trail,” the CM said.

    He questioned the agencies for not coming out with any evidence in support of their charges.

    “If I say I gave Rs 1,000 crores to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on September 17 at 7 pm, will the ED-CBI arrest him? There has to have some evidence.,” Kejriwal said.

    He cited the names of several persons under the net in the excise case and alleged third-degree treatment of them.

    “One Chandan Reddy was beaten so badly that his eardrums burst. A witness was pressured to sign a fabricated statement by threatening to jail his father and wife. Some others were coerced into giving false statements that they later withdrew in the courts,” he claimed.

    The lawyer of one of the witnesses has gone on record in court to highlight how his client was being “harassed” to “implicate Delhi politicians”, said the AAP convener.

    Kejriwal said the whole issue is that all the parties are busy with loot and people now have hope from the AAP.

    If they also started building schools and hospitals where will be the money for them to loot, he added.



    [ad_2]
    #corrupt #world #honest #Kejriwal

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • ChatGPT’s greatest win might just be its ability to make us think it is honest

    ChatGPT’s greatest win might just be its ability to make us think it is honest

    [ad_1]

    Toronto: In American writer Mark Twain’s autobiography, he quotes or perhaps misquotes former British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli as saying: “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

    In a marvellous leap forward, artificial intelligence combines all three in a tidy little package.

    ChatGPT, and other generative AI chatbots like it, are trained on vast datasets from across the internet to produce the statistically most likely response to a prompt. Its answers are not based on any understanding of what makes something funny, meaningful or accurate, but rather, the phrasing, spelling, grammar and even style of other webpages.

    MS Education Academy

    It presents its responses through what’s called a “conversational interface”: it remembers what a user has said, and can have a conversation using context cues and clever gambits. It’s statistical pastiche plus statistical panache, and that’s where the trouble lies.

    Unthinking, but convincing

    When I talk to another human, it cues a lifetime of my experience in dealing with other people. So when a programme speaks like a person, it is very hard to not react as if one is engaging in an actual conversation taking something in, thinking about it, responding in the context of both of our ideas.

    Yet, that’s not at all what is happening with an AI interlocutor. They cannot think and they do not have understanding or comprehension of any sort.

    Presenting information to us as a human does, in conversation, makes AI more convincing than it should be. Software is pretending to be more reliable than it is, because it’s using human tricks of rhetoric to fake trustworthiness, competence and understanding far beyond its capabilities.

    There are two issues here: is the output correct; and do people think that the output is correct?

    The interface side of the software is promising more than the algorithm-side can deliver on, and the developers know it. Sam Altman, the chief executive officer of OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, admits that “ChatGPT is incredibly limited, but good enough at some things to create a misleading impression of greatness.”

    That still hasn’t stopped a stampede of companies rushing to integrate the early-stage tool into their user-facing products (including Microsoft’s Bing search), in an effort not to be left out.

    Fact and fiction

    Sometimes the AI is going to be wrong, but the conversational interface produces outputs with the same confidence and polish as when it is correct. For example, as science-fiction writer Ted Chiang points out, the tool makes errors when doing addition with larger numbers, because it doesn’t actually have any logic for doing math.

    It simply pattern-matches examples seen on the web that involve addition. And while it might find examples for more common math questions, it just hasn’t seen training text involving larger numbers.

    It doesn’t “know’ the math rules a 10-year-old would be able to explicitly use. Yet the conversational interface presents its response as certain, no matter how wrong it is, as reflected in this exchange with ChatGPT.

    User: What’s the capital of Malaysia?

    ChatGPT: The capital of Malaysia is Kuala Lampur.

    User: What is 27 * 7338?

    ChatGPT: 27 * 7338 is 200,526.

    It’s not.

    Generative AI can blend actual facts with made-up ones in a biography of a public figure, or cite plausible scientific references for papers that were never written.

    That makes sense: statistically, webpages note that famous people have often won awards, and papers usually have references. ChatGPT is just doing what it was built to do, and assembling content that could be likely, regardless of whether it’s true.

    Computer scientists refer to this as AI hallucination. The rest of us might call it lying.

    Intimidating outputs

    When I teach my design students, I talk about the importance of matching output to the process. If an idea is at the conceptual stage, it shouldn’t be presented in a manner that makes it look more polished than it actually is they shouldn’t render it in 3D or print it on glossy cardstock. A pencil sketch makes clear that the idea is preliminary, easy to change and shouldn’t be expected to address every part of a problem.

    The same thing is true of conversational interfaces: when tech “speaks” to us in well-crafted, grammatically correct or chatty tones, we tend to interpret it as having much more thoughtfulness and reasoning than is actually present. It’s a trick a con-artist should use, not a computer.

    AI developers have a responsibility to manage user expectations, because we may already be primed to believe whatever the machine says. Mathematician Jordan Ellenberg describes a type of “algebraic intimidation” that can overwhelm our better judgement just by claiming there’s math involved.

    AI, with hundreds of billions of parameters, can disarm us with a similar algorithmic intimidation.

    While we’re making the algorithms produce better and better content, we need to make sure the interface itself doesn’t over-promise. Conversations in the tech world are already filled with overconfidence and arrogance maybe AI can have a little humility instead.

    [ad_2]
    #ChatGPTs #greatest #win #ability #honest

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • The Brutally Honest, Somewhat Self-Loathing Guide to Etiquette in D.C.

    The Brutally Honest, Somewhat Self-Loathing Guide to Etiquette in D.C.

    [ad_1]

    We asked Politicos, friends and acquaintances — the kind of people we’d say “nice to see you” to, even if we weren’t sure we’d ever met them before or just knew their face from TV — how they really make it in this city so many of us love to hate.

    Greetings and introductions

    Say “Nice to see you” — even if it is your first time seeing the person.

    Too much hobnobbing at Correspondents’ Dinner after-parties and now you can’t remember if you’ve actually met someone when you see them out? Don’t worry; that happens to everyone here. “Nice to see you” is an easy way to avoid offending someone who you’ve forgotten you’ve met.

    Learn the magic of asking enthusiastically, “Where are you now?”

    This is another way of evading “I am not totally sure we have met before … and even if we have, I do not remember your name or what you do.” The sentence works whether the truth is “We have never met before” or “I used to work for you and you never remembered my name then either” or even “I used to be married to your spouse.”

    Make sure you address former bigwigs appropriately, especially in public.

    If someone has ever been elected or appointed to anything, ever, they are to be addressed by that title going forward — a requirement that does not expire at death. And if they’ve held numerous senior roles, you are to address them by the most senior title they’ve ever had. (When Andrew Card was George W. Bush’s chief of staff, everyone called him Secretary Card, because he had previously been secretary of Transportation, a position that is technically higher than a chief of staff in the executive branch, even if the chief of staff is the second most powerful person in the White House (not counting the vice president).)

    Things get confusing when you’re addressing someone who used to be a senator and an ambassador, like Max Baucus, who was a long-time senator from Montana and also served as ambassador to China — the right move then is to pick one or the other, but you can’t go wrong by sticking with the legislative title, which the person did earn, after all, by winning an election. And yes, that person who cheerfully told you “call me Ted” in the greenroom fully expects to be “Senior Deputy Assistant Commissioner” the minute you’re in front of other people.

    Don’t overdo it on sympathy if you run into someone who’s just lost an election.

    Play it cool. They might have lost, but you don’t have to make them feel like a loser. If they’ve had a long career, say, “Well you’ve had a helluva run.” If their public life is being cut short, say, “Well, it was just a crazy cycle.”

    At a cocktail party

    Be subtle about asking what someone does for a living.

    D.C. is a city of tribes, and to avoid conflict, you’ve got to figure out the basics of what the person you’re talking to at a party does for work to avoid awkward fault lines. (Ever sprung it on a Hill staffer you’re a journalist 20 minutes into the conversation? They don’t appreciate it.) But digging into one’s career background right off the bat is also a problem; you could look too opportunistic — even by this town’s standards. So start with “How long have you been in D.C.?” or “How do you know the host?” This one also does the trick surprisingly well, when applicable: “How did you and your spouse meet?”

    Someone peers over your shoulder in search of a more important person? Two can play that game.

    This phenomenon might be rude in other cities. Here, it’s still rude, though it’s also to be expected. The right response is to follow your conversation partner’s gaze and then ask them: “Oh my god, is that Ron Klain? I’ve been meaning to talk with him.” Then make a beeline to him. If you want to make this exit especially graceful, you can pair up the person you were talking to with someone else you know nearby.

    You have to get gossip, but you can’t ask for it.

    This city runs on gossip. Journalists are actually paid to keep track of it. But lobbyists, members of Congress and Hill staffers need to know who’s up and who’s down, too. To master the art of asking for gossip without asking for gossip, turn to flattery. Try this: “I bet you know Pete Buttigieg. What’s he really like?” Or you can always give a little bit of gossip to get it.

    Before trashing someone to a stranger, make sure the two aren’t married to each other.

    Tons of D.C. couples are married, but they have different last names. It can get awkward if you unknowingly bad mouth someone in front of their spouse.

    Don’t surprise your host if you’re arriving with staff.

    If you are an elected official attending a D.C. cocktail party, RSVP for all staffers accompanying you. If you forget, you can probably get away with bringing a maximum of 2 uninvited guests without judgment. If a host runs out of food — or, worse in this city, booze — because they were surprised by your large group, you might not get an invite back.

    At work

    Be discreet about your move from public to private.

    The classic Capitol Hill blast email announcing your departure from a congressional office or committee should never reveal the name of your new “downtown” employer — that’s to be relayed later on your Linkedin page, in POLITICO’s Influence or privately, not in the context of your current, taxpayer-funded job. The revolving door thrives because people pretend there is some distance between the two worlds; shattering that illusion would be considered in poor taste.

    When on Capitol Hill as a member of the media, wait your turn.

    If you’re a reporter and see a fellow journalist having a one-on-one conversation with a member, wait your turn. Don’t interrupt or join the conversation or listen in — you’ll regret it when your cable show invites dry up. But if it’s a full gaggle, rules don’t apply; jump in.

    Make sure you have the same definition as your conversation partner of “off the record,” “on background” and “deep background.”

    The media-savvy people of D.C. think they know what these terms mean, but many a political staffer has been surprised to learn that people have different definitions — and that’s a morningafter call no one enjoys. Make sure you are on the same page before the dishing begins. For more tips, look no further than the Treasury and Justice Department’s website on how to leak info.

    Just slammed someone in print? Don’t feel bad.

    Look the person right in the eye and ask: “How are ya?” This is what it means to be a part of official Washington.

    If you have something important to say, text it.

    D.C. is a formal city; to reach people, you often have to go through official channels — a communications director, or a press secretary. But if you need to ask a real question, or if someone needs to get in touch with you about something important, texting is the way to go. There’s no better way to set up a meeting — without staff — or disclose substantive information than the humble text.

    Treat interns like future speakers of the House. Because … sometimes they are.

    You never know who is going to be your future boss. Case in point: There was a time when Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi was a Senate intern, all the way back in 1963, alongside Rep. Steny Hoyer.

    At a book party

    Don’t ask hardball questions at book party Q&As.

    The best questions show how smart you are by making an interesting point and getting a good answer from the author. If you can add a joke during your question, that’s a bonus.

    You don’t have to read your colleague’s book.

    But you do have to tweet something nice suggesting you did, or have plans to.

    But you do have to buy it at the party.

    They didn’t ask you to come for your witty banter.

    Dating

    Keep your two phones to yourself during dates.

    Yes, insiders know that having two phones means you likely are a government employee with a very important job. But anyone savvy enough to know that will also see your choice to flaunt your two-phone status for the needy, attention-seeking move it is.

    If you’re a conservative on a dating app, own it.

    Don’t be the guy or girl who puts “moderate” when you’re actually very conservative. Nobody likes false advertising, especially in a city where political identity trumps all.

    Don’t put your Twitter handle in your Hinge profile.

    If someone’s interested, they’ll probably find a way to stalk you online eventually. A Twitter handle will just get you a left swipe.

    Don’t tell a reporter on a date that you’re off the record.

    They know that already, and besides, no one cares about the consulting you do for Deloitte.

    White House Correspondents’ Dinner

    Don’t have any shame about asking to get put on a WHCD after-party list.

    This is the weekend when Washington celebrates its core value: shamelessness. So embrace it. There is at least one person in your circle of friends who knows the right person to email about getting into an after-party. So go ahead and send that email asking if you can come.

    Spot Kim Kardashian? No need to play it cool.

    This isn’t New York or L.A., where people are — or act — unimpressed when they see a celebrity. Here, we hardly ever see real celebrities, so go ahead; freak out a little. Ask for an autograph or picture. You might be surprised when you see Kim losing her cool over getting to meet Jake Tapper or Tony Blinken.

    When in doubt, skip the main event and dress down.

    WHCD is basically nerd prom, and the real would-be cool people just show up to after parties not in black-tie. The goal is to communicate: “I’m too cool to go to anything as banal as the dinner.”

    In the district

    Don’t be too loud in public — especially if you’re talking about anything you don’t want reported.

    You’re likely within earshot of a journalist who will hear it and is totally within their rights to report it.

    Keep virtue-signaling at a minimum.

    We know you try to avoid Uber as much as possible, tip wait staff very, very well and even think all the new tipping add-ons are long overdue. But this is a deep-blue city, where progressives are very committed and outspoken. We’ve heard it all before. So you can keep your tipping and transportation habits to yourself and move on.

    Learn the polite way to dodge people — and don’t take it personally when someone blows you off.

    “Let’s get lunch” or “Let’s get drinks over recess” is how people sign off here. They likely don’t mean it. If they do, they’ll follow up with a date and time.

    [ad_2]
    #Brutally #Honest #SelfLoathing #Guide #Etiquette #D.C
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Honest govt, safe environment garner huge investments in UP: Piyush Goyal

    Honest govt, safe environment garner huge investments in UP: Piyush Goyal

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on Sunday said due to the “honest government and safe environment” in Uttar Pradesh, there are huge commitments towards investment.

    Addressing the Uttar Pradesh global investors summit in Lucknow on its last day, the commerce minister said that there have been commitments of several lakhs of crores rupees by investors during the summit.

    “It is the proof that the people now believe that it is now easy to invest in the state, that the state has an honest system, that law and order is in place and the investors have invested their faith in the people of the state,” Goyal noted.

    Uttar Pradesh, he added, was an emerging ecosystem state in 2020 but in the 2021 ranking, it was a leader in the start up ecosystem.

    There are 8,277 start ups in the state, Goyal informed further.

    He said that India signed three important free trade agreements last year and this year also “we were hoping to sign two or three pacts, which will open the doors for the breweries and wineries of the state as they will get market access, investments and technologies.”

    A recent increase in exports and in the number of start ups in Uttar Pradesh shows the immense possibilities for investors, Goyal added.

    Earlier on Saturday, the state’s chief minister Yogi Adityanath had said that through the summit, investments worth Rs 33 lakh crore had been garnered.

    The summit had begun on February 10.

    [ad_2]
    #Honest #govt #safe #environment #garner #huge #investments #Piyush #Goyal

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )