Tag: happened

  • I don’t know how it happened, but it has happened: KL Rahul

    I don’t know how it happened, but it has happened: KL Rahul

    [ad_1]

    Lucknow: His baffling batting approach led to his team’s seven-run loss against Gujarat Titans but Lucknow Super Giants captain KL Rahul on Saturday refused to take the blame, saying “these things happen in cricket and we will have to take it on the chin”.

    Chasing 136 for a win on a sluggish pitch, LSG were cruising along at 105 for 1 after 14 overs with 31 needed off 36 deliveries but ended at 128 for 7 from 20 overs.

    Rahul (68 off 61 balls) reached to his 50 off 33 balls but then consumed another 28 deliveries for his 18 before he was out in the final over from which LSG needed 12.

    MS Education Academy

    “I don’t know how it happened, but it has happened. I can’t put a finger on where it went wrong, but we lost two points today, this is cricket,” Rahul said at the post-match presentation.

    “We started well with the bat, but these things happen, we’ll have to take it on the chin.”

    Rahul, however, conceded that the batters should have taken a few more chances as they had wickets in hand.

    “We were well ahead in the game and I wasn’t really trying to bat deep, I still wanted to play my shots, take on the bowlers, but they bowled well in that 2-3 over period, by Noor and Jayant.

    “We perhaps should have taken a few more chances with wickets in hand. They bowled decently. Not an easy wicket for new batters to come in. Set batters need to finish the game.

    “We missed some boundary opportunities in the end. The pressure got to us in the last 3-4 overs, we played well until then. But we should have got it done.”

    He praised his bowlers for restricting GT to 135 for 6.

    “I thought we were brilliant with the ball, 135 was 10 runs under par, the bowling was exceptional.

    “But still a long way to go, 8 points off 7 games, we were on the wrong side of the result today.”

    Hardik Pandya said a win like this can boost the team’s confidence.

    “After the two games we lost, this seems like god is telling us I am not always going to take from you, I will give to you too,” he said.

    “The way the environment changed when we got wickets, the belief we had, was wonderful to watch. In a tournament like this, one loss can break you, but such a win can do the opposite.”

    Talking about the team strategy, he said, “At best, we could have score 10 more runs. That’s how the wicket was.

    “During the strategic timeout, we spoke about the set batter batting longer because the new batter was going to find it difficult.”

    Asked at what stage he thought his side could win, Pandya said, “When there was 30 required off 30, I felt they were ahead. We started sniffing something when it came down to 27 off 4 overs.

    “A run a ball off 10 overs is different, but when it comes down to 24 off 24, you know a mistake can cost you the game. That’s when the game changes.”

    Asked why he gave the ball to Mohit Sharma to defend 12 runs in the final over, he said, “The amount of cricket Mohit has played, I didn’t need to tell him anything. The calmness, planning and execution he showed, it was tremendous.

    “At same time, Shami showed his experience. Mohit and Shami were tremendous. Special mention to Jayant as well, playing after such a long time. Obviously Noor has some talent.”

    Mohit, on his part, said he did not try anything special.

    “Nothing special, everything’s normal, as usual. I think I have been consistent. You need to focus and prepare in the same manner each and every time, that helps.

    “You need to keep practising, just stick to the basics and try not to overthink. That belief factor was always there. Nehra adviced us to stick to our plans honestly. I tried to focus on executing my plans. Also tried that the batters couldn’t read what I was trying to bowl.”

    He said the team never lost the belief and captain Hardik Pandya kept telling the players from the beginning that they were winning the match.

    [ad_2]
    #dont #happened #happened #Rahul

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Shocking: Seven Batsmen Out For Zero, Opposite Won The International T20 Match In Just 2 Balls, Happened For First Time In T20 History – Kashmir News

    [ad_1]

    Shocking: Seven Batsmen Out For Zero, Opposite Won The International T20 Match In Just 2 Balls, Happened For First Time In T20 History – Kashmir News

    [ad_2]
    #Shocking #Batsmen #Won #International #T20 #Match #Balls #Happened #Time #T20 #History #Kashmir #News

    ( With inputs from : kashmirnews.in )

  • Whatever happened to middle age? The mysterious case of the disappearing life stage

    Whatever happened to middle age? The mysterious case of the disappearing life stage

    [ad_1]

    Amid all the recent commentary about John Cleese resurrecting Fawlty Towers, one fact struck me as even more preposterous than the setting’s proposed relocation to a Caribbean boutique hotel: when the original series aired, Cleese was only 35 years old.

    When it comes to screen culture, middle age isn’t what it used to be. People magazine gleefully reported last year that the characters in And Just Like That, the rebooted series of Sex and the City, were the same age (average 55) as the Golden Girls when they made their first outing in the mid-80s. How can that be possible? My recollection of the besequined Florida housemates was that they were teetering off this mortal coil, but then everyone seems old when you are young.

    Meanwhile, a popular Twitter account, The Meldrew Point, has the sole purpose of celebrating people who, implausibly, have reached the age the actor Richard Wilson was when he appeared in the first episode of One Foot in the Grave (19,537 days). It’s hard to believe, but these 53-and-a-half-year-olds include J-Lo, Renée Zellweger, Molly Ringwald, Julia Sawalha and Ice Cube.

    Jennifer Lopez looking impossibly glamorous
    Looking good at 53 … Jennifer Lopez. Photograph: Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for The Recording Academy

    Back in the day, 40 was the marker for midlife, but now, finding consensus on when middle age begins and what it represents isn’t easy. The Collins English dictionary gnomically defines it as “the period in your life when you are no longer young but have not yet become old”. The Encyclopaedia Britannica says it is between 40 and 60. Meanwhile, a 2018 YouGov survey reported that most Britons aged between 40 and 64 considered themselves middle-aged – but so did 44% of people aged between 65 and 69.

    “There’s no point trying to impose chronological age on what is or is not middle age,” says Prof Les Mayhew, the head of global research at the International Longevity Centre UK. “With people living longer, your 30s are no longer middle age; that has switched to the 40s and 50s.” But even then, he believes putting a number on it is meaningless. “In some cases, in your 50s, you might be thinking about a second or even third career, but for others you might have serious health problems and be unable to work.

    “Governments are always trying to impose these labels of administrative convenience for things that are supposed to happen at a certain age – for example, you are allegedly an adult at the age of 18 and you aren’t old enough to receive a state pension until 66. Totally arbitrary. Meanwhile, GPs want you to book in for a ‘midlife MOT’, which is a great jazzy concept to get out of what should be happening – an annual health check-up.”

    Patrick Reid, 53, is a London-based financial trader who has an unusual perspective on age. “I went to university late; I was 23 and other students used to say to me: ‘Oh, you’re so old!’ Then, after working for 15 years as a programme scheduler on BBC Two, I decided to change career. I turned up for my first day on a futures trading desk in my best suit with a Guardian under my arm. The place was full of these 21-year-olds in jeans going: ‘Who the hell is this?’

    “Then, eight years ago, I went through another change. I’d been a bit of a party animal; it wasn’t agreeing with me. I decided to take steps to get happier and fitter. I feel so lucky now that I can go to the gym, run my own business and have a holistic outlook on life. Age has no meaning to me, except sometimes I do look in the mirror and say: ‘Oh yeah, I am actually 53.’”

    Left, the Golden Girls, aged between 51 and 63; right, the cast of And Just Like That, in their mid-50s
    Left, the Golden Girls, aged between 51 and 63; right, the cast of And Just Like That, in their mid-50s. Composite: Cine Text/Allstar; WarnerMedia Direct/HBO Max

    Middle age once had a purpose of sorts, a time that offered the stability and continuity that used to come from having a job for life. Now, it’s not just your employment that might feel precarious, but your job function itself. Research from the Institute for the Future reported that 85% of jobs that will exist by 2030 don’t exist yet.

    “This used to be a stage where you slowed down to enjoy life. It allowed a person to take stock and reassess,” says Julia Bueno, a therapist and the author of Everyone’s a Critic. “Now, it’s: ‘Retrain to be a psychotherapist!’ I think middle age reflects that you’ve still got life in you; you’re embracing a last hurrah. But I’m also aware that some people feel pressurised to reinvent themselves, to look fantastic, to not slow down or age gracefully. There’s the pressure to put retinol on your face, or erase or glam the greys. You’re not allowed to just be grey – it has to be glamorous.”

    Bueno works with many women who have become mothers in their 40s, even 50s, and considers this another important shift. “Having a newborn in your arms does throw hackneyed ideas about middle age out of the window.”

    The very words “middle age” can cause strong negative reactions. Roz Colthart, 49, runs a property business in Edinburgh alongside studying for a master’s degree. “Middle age as a term makes you feel a bit yuck. The term ‘middle’ is so vanilla; who wants to be average? You’re no longer young, but you’re not an old sweetie that people are going to give up their seat for on the bus, either. Yet middle age is actually a fantastic place to be. It’s just the judgmental attitudes towards it that are depressing.”

    Colthart does not tick many of middle age’s traditional boxes. “I don’t have a husband; I don’t have children. There is a pressure on people that we have to conform with the life cycle according to what age we are.”

    It’s true that, in the past, midlife was associated with a particular set of life circumstances – a mortgage, a spouse, children, a lawnmower. But for many, these life stages are happening later, if at all. It must be harder to feel like you are in the pipe-and-slippers phase of life when, at 40, you still live in a flatshare and don’t own a sofa, let alone a home.

    Dalia Hawley, 41, lives in Wakefield and is what marketers would term a “geriatric millennial”. She lives with her partner and their three chickens and runs a skincare business part-time. “I might be classed as middle-aged to some people, but I don’t feel it. Part of me does sometimes feel as if I should own a house or have a full-time job, but then I think I couldn’t imagine anything worse. I’ve never earned enough to get a mortgage. When I was in my 20s, I thought 40 was really old. But now I’m there, I feel younger and fitter than I’ve ever been.”

    So what age does she consider to be old? “I’m not sure there is such an age. It’s more a question of whether someone can live independently. For example, both my parents are in their late 70s and still go travelling in their caravan. I don’t think of them as being old at all.”

    The crime writer Casey Kelleher, 43, is another midlife millennial. She is equally scathing about the idea of being middle-aged: “I feel as if I’m only now starting my life. My first son was born when I was 17 and my second at 20. I met my husband a couple of years later. The kids have left home and now we are reassessing our lives.” While most of her friends are setting down with young families, she is contemplating travelling, moving abroad or working with foster children.

    “Midlife isn’t a plateau,” she says. “I don’t like the phrase ‘over the hill’, as if the best times are behind you. Considering how long we might live, it’s worth savouring every single day.”

    Kelleher finds that writing older characters is exciting. “The stakes are much higher in midlife. By then, people have richer life experiences, lifelong friendships, real love, loss, pain and heartbreak. Characters have more to lose if things go wrong. The way that characters, particularly female ones, between 40 and 60 are depicted by my generation of crime writers and on TV has started to change. Just look at Happy Valley.”

    The stories we tell about being a particular age are powerful because they reflect what is expected of us, what possibilities might await. Sharon Blackie, a psychologist and the author of Hagitude: Reimagining the Second Half of Life, says that in recent years, for women, at least, the cultural discussion has shifted so that menopause has eclipsed middle age as a significant transition. “The interesting thing is that menopause can happen at all different ages – mid-40s, mid-50s and beyond – rather than one age.” Certainly, high-profile documentaries such as Channel 4’s documentary Sex, Myths and the Menopause, and online communities such as Noon, have changed the conversation.

    Blackie observes that, in folklore, the hag, while appearing to be the epitome of people’s fears about ageing, is actually a positive archetype. “The hag is a woman, from menopause onwards, who is not defined by their relationship to anyone else. They are not someone’s mother or daughter or wife; they have their own power, their own way of being in the world. There is a freedom to not belonging to anyone that allows them to come to fruition in the world.”

    Madonna, age 64, at the Grammy awards earlier this month.
    Madonna, age 64, at the Grammy awards earlier this month. Photograph: Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for The Recording Academy

    It’s a comforting theory, but I am not sure the world has caught up with it yet. You need only witness the wave of vitriol directed at Madonna’s smooth-cheeked appearance at the Grammys to realise that there is still widespread fear about how women choose to tackle the ageing process.

    And what of men? In the past, the male midlife crisis had a well-trodden set of cliches, from the red Ferrari or Harley-Davidson to the trophy wife. Are these still relevant? These days, the term seems to be associated more with anxiety, depression and the search for meaning than with the quest for leather trousers. I even came across an academic paper entitled Dark Night of the Shed: Men, the Midlife Crisis, Spirituality – and Sheds.

    “Although men don’t experience the same cataclysmic physical change as women in midlife, many of the men I speak to do go through a significant psychological change around the age of 50, which can be accompanied by a similar sense of grief and loss that women go through with menopause,” says Blackie. “Carl Jung theorised that the first half of life was about working in the outer world, developing your identity, career and family. He viewed the second half of life as being about turning inward, searching for meaning, spiritual or otherwise.”

    For many men, a less esoteric way of addressing existential angst is to embrace a punishing fitness regime. Yet, while this is generally a healthy thing, the body doesn’t lie. Devoted tennis player Geoff Dyer, the 64-year-old author of The Last Days of Roger Federer, a meditation on late middle age, recently had elbow surgery. “Three months after the operation, by which time I was supposed to be able to play tennis again, I saw the surgeon and told him it hadn’t worked. I’d gone from being a coolish middle-aged person with an elbow problem to an old and frail invalid.

    “He showed me the MRI, which proved it had worked, and said to keep at it, keep doing the physical therapy. And he was right. I’m now restored to full fitness. It might not seem like that to you if you saw me hobbling around the court, but I am in a state of youthful-seeming bliss.”

    Dyer is similarly exasperated that he cannot drink much any more. “Boozing takes a fearsome toll as you get older. I say that with some authority, because we had a dinner at home in LA on Saturday where I had a skinful of delicious red wine – by London standards, a modest amount – and felt like 100-year-old sludge for 24 hours afterwards.”

    And therein lies the problem with all our “age is just a number” mental gymnastics. Dispensing with middle age is comforting because if we never face up to being in the middle, we will never have to contemplate the end. Until we are forced to, that is.

    A good friend of mine turned 60 recently; he summed up the experience as “a sudden cold-water splash of finding yourself facing terms like ‘geriatric’ and ‘senior’ and feeling utterly disconnected from any real sense of what your biological age means, other than the onset of physical decrepitude and declining eyesight”. The rude awakening was largely caused, he said, because “when we get to our 50s, we kid ourselves that it’s just a last gasp of the early 40s, when it isn’t at all”.

    Researching this article, I was struck by the fact that not a single person I spoke to was happy to own the badge of middle age. But back in the day, the term was viewed as a state rather than a trait. A person was middle-aged because that was their actual stage of life, not simply labelled as such because they were uncreative, tedious or, heaven forfend, unproductive. As someone who went back to university at 56 and is planning to launch a business, I am as guilty of a failure to relax as everyone else. Are we all just frantically trying to stave off the inevitable?

    Bueno recalls being at a 50th birthday party at a pub with funky music. “People were having a great time. We were all bending ourselves out of shape, leaning in to talk to one another.” You might think they were discussing important ideas and plans for the future, but you would be wrong. “Everyone was shouting the same sentence: ‘I can’t hear a bloody thing!’”

    Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.



    [ad_2]
    #happened #middle #age #mysterious #case #disappearing #life #stage
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Why California was over Feinstein’s retirement before it happened

    Why California was over Feinstein’s retirement before it happened

    [ad_1]

    20230214 feinstein 2 francis 1

    In fact, most of the anticipated dominoes had already fallen before Feinstein played her last piece. Feinstein’s retirement had been so widely expected that California Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff and Katie Porter were already running to succeed her. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), had told her colleagues and supporters she planned to run, while former Speaker Nancy Pelosi had publicly endorsed Schiff based on the expectation Feinstein would retire.

    What Feinstein’s Tuesday announcement did do was eliminate the conditional nature of that endorsement. It also allowed candidates and their supporters to quit the awkward dance. And “if there was any [hesitation] on the throttle, for any of the campaigns, it’s gone,” said Doug Herman, a Southern California-based Democratic strategist.

    Any misgivings over pushing out the longest-serving woman senator seemed mostly nonexistent, anyway. Her official retirement won’t do much to fundamentally alter the dynamics of the campaign.

    “Not a lick,” Herman said. “Look, Schiff and Porter had kickoff rallies already. If there’s anything they’re holding back, tell me where. Nobody expected that she was running, anyway.”

    In her retirement announcement, Feinstein asserted that she will serve out her full term, preventing another appointment courtesy of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. He had vowed to select a Black woman if he got another chance, after picking Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) to fill then-Sen. Kamala Harris’ seat. The expectation within Democratic circles is he would have chosen Lee.

    If Feinstein holds to her timeline, it will guarantee the kind of open race that ambitious California Democrats have eagerly awaited.

    The field may still expand. California has no shortage of Democrats in statewide elected office, plus members of Congress and independently wealthy Democrats who could self-fund a campaign. Lee, in a statement praising Feinstein’s “historic Senate career,” said, “While I hope we will keep the focus in these coming days on celebrating the Senator and her historic tenure in the Senate, I know there are questions about the Senate race in 2024, which I will address soon.”

    Each candidate — and Lee, who is expected to formally announce in the coming days — has dealt with the unease around Feinstein differently.

    Porter, the youngest of the group and new to Congress by comparison, did express some initial hesitation about leaping into the race with Feinstein’s retirement still unclear. Some Porter supporters worried that it could appear like she was trampling on the long sendoff of a woman who many in the state regard as an icon.

    But Porter, who hemorrhaged cash to retain her purple Orange County congressional seat, ultimately pushed through with the earliest launch. There was little in the way of backlash within the party. In fact, the outrage from most of the rival camps related to the announcement occurring just as disastrous storms were hitting California.

    Schiff, who is widely expected to win Feinstein’s support for her seat, was far more calculating in his approach — initially taking care to defer to the senator’s eventual retirement decision. But he wasn’t willing to wait completely, unwilling to cede a state of 40 million people for weeks on end to a rival for no good reason. Then the endorsement of Pelosi represented a major coup, especially in a race thus far populated by two Southern Californians who are fighting for Bay Area inroads.

    Lee’s whole game — at least for months — was hoping to win Newsom’s appointment if Feinstein stepped down early. Colleagues and aides to the California Democrat have shared uncomfortable stories about Feinstein’s ability to continue the job, including an instance over two years ago when she stepped aside from the top spot on the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee.

    Absent an appointment, Lee would have an uphill climb. Her lack of resources as she enters the race all but assures that she would have to rely on a torrent of outside spending to boost her — advisers and analysts expect the low-end down-payment for TV advertising heading into next year’s competitive primary would be $25 million to $30 million.

    Ultimately, Feinstein’s endorsement may not be as valuable as that of sitting senators in some other states. Her approval rating had fallen underwater in California as her moderate politics fell out of step with the state’s activist base. For a Democrat courting moderates or older Democrats, said Rose Kapolczynski, a Democratic strategist, Feinstein’s endorsement may be beneficial, though not determinative in California.

    “In most campaigns for an open seat, everyone wants the endorsement of the retiring incumbent, but that’s not the case here,” said Kapolczynski, who helped guide former Sen. Barbara Boxer’s political career. “Feinstein now is more moderate than the Democratic primary electorate, so her endorsement is not as sought after as you might imagine the incumbent’s endorsement would be.”

    [ad_2]
    #California #Feinsteins #retirement #happened
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • ‘If I’d had a therapist, do you think any of this would have happened?’: Pamela Anderson on being chewed up and spat out by fame

    ‘If I’d had a therapist, do you think any of this would have happened?’: Pamela Anderson on being chewed up and spat out by fame

    [ad_1]

    Right before Covid hit, Pamela Anderson was returning home to Canada from Marseille in the south of France. Not just any old place in Canada, but Ladysmith on Vancouver Island and the white clapboard house where she grew up. “Scene of the crime” she calls it. In France she’d been living with footballer Adil Rami for a year, but she’d had her heart broken. He wasn’t just explosively jealous, she learned, but still in a relationship with a woman with whom he had children. Just date someone normal, she thought, the spectre of former rock-star husbands Tommy Lee and Kid Rock perhaps kicking doors in the back of her mind. Renovations were beginning on her new-old home and Anderson’s eye alighted on one of the contractors. Normal. A year later and 25lb heavier from their nightly beer sessions, she sat on the sofa willing – desperately willing – her fifth husband to say something interesting. “Oh boy,” she sighs now. “Normal was the worst.”

    So, another divorce under her belt, Anderson swore off men and took a long, hard look at her life. She went into cupboards and attics, emptying them of memories – journals, letters, news and talkshow footage, home videotapes (as we know, she’s an inveterate taper) – and tried to map her life. What happened to that tomboy kid she once was, with the freckles and the dove-grey eyes? Why did her life seem to run in crazy chicanes around toxic relationships? Not even she could make sense of her haphazard career trajectory.

    Few need reminding that Anderson came to the public’s attention by way of Playboy magazine and TV soap Baywatch (1992-97), or that in 1996 stolen private footage of her and husband Tommy Lee having sex went viral on the fledgling world wide web, netting $77m (£50m) in 12 months for the illegal distributors. Anderson never benefited one cent. Instead, her career plummeted, her marriage foundered and she became public hussy No 1. At times she thought: “Why do they hate me so much? Why do these grown men hate me?”

    But also: why did she play ball? Why did she put up with the ritual humiliation? Why did she sit under the studio lights time and again, comedians making the same lame joke for 10, 15, 25 years? (Alan Carr in 2010: “It’s fun being screwed, isn’t it, Pammy? I’ve seen the tape.”) What took her from one arguably bad decision (say, Big Brother 2011) to the next (German Big Brother 2013)?

    There were plenty of actual bad boyfriends, too. “After the tape, it wasn’t like I was attracting men who had the best of intentions.” In 2006, she married and filed for divorce from Kid Rock. In 2007, she married and left poker player Rick Salomon: “He ended up being a big drug addict. We found a crack pipe in the Christmas tree.” (He still denies this, claiming it was somebody else’s.) She remarried Salomon in 2014 after he “got clean” and divorced him again in 2015. She says she would have married her friend the activist Julian Assange if it would have got him out of jail. In early 2020 she married an old suitor, Jon Peters, but later denied the union was ever legal; in December that year she married “normal” Dan Hayhurst but left him soon after. She completely abandoned herself, she thinks now. “It’s a form of suicide.” If it weren’t for her sons Brandon and Dylan Lee, she says, she wouldn’t be here. “Over the last 20 years, I went missing. MIA even to myself. I was drinking, I was trying drugs – so not me. I just went off the rails.” She was “difficult” at work. “Unmanageable, they called me.” Did she have therapy? “Are you kidding? If I’d had a therapist, do you think any of this would have happened?”

    So, in January 2022, she gave herself a goal: “Don’t meet any men. Just focus … just be in love with myself.” She pauses. “Believe me, I’ve been restless. I’ve thought: ‘Well, maybe I should just call …?’ Then: ‘No.’”

    Today, she’s 12 months clean of men, so to speak, and has plenty to show for the time in recovery. In addition to stepping on to Broadway as Roxie in Chicago last April, she has written her memoirs, Love, Pamela, and encouraged by her sons has made a revealing documentary about her life, Pamela, a Love Story, which is what brings me to her beachfront hotel in Santa Monica. Anderson is digging in her bag for throat sweets and a honey and lemon lollipop (“not vegan, I’m afraid”), expressing maternal concern over my hoarse voice. No protest can stop her loading the table in front of me with hot drinks and vegetable sticks. “Do we have vitamin C?” she asks her assistant.

    Pamela Anderson appears on stage for her curtain call Broadway debut playing Roxie Hart in ‘Chicago’ Pamela Anderson’s ‘Chicago’ Broadway debut, New York, USA - 12 Apr 2022
    As Roxie Hart in Chicago last year. Photograph: Photo Image Press/Rex/Shutterstock

    The hair is instantly recognisable (“Scandinavian Blonde $5 box”), though a little warmer than the lightning flash of Baywatch days. The voice has the soft buoyancy of Marilyn Monroe – who she references in our photoshoot – and there’s that toughness, undercut with wit and a mischievous vulnerability that reminds me somehow of Dolly Parton. The forerunners for her Baywatch look were Brigitte Bardot, Jayne Mansfield, Jean Harlow; it’s the male fantasy prototype that stretches back to Botticelli’s Venus, with her prodigious hair, pert boobs and oyster shell. Anderson took the cat’s eyes, pencil brows and the Marie Antionette hair-stack and gave it some extra fire: something ravenous, uncut and peculiarly 1990s. Her story is about love addiction, sure, but also of living on the frontline of that era.

    In case anyone is still on the fence about how toxic it was for women in the public eye in that decade, Anderson’s story lays it bare. Here’s an early exchange between young Anderson and an interviewer on NBC: “I’ve never sat across from an interview subject before and said, ‘May we talk briefly about your breasts?’” Here’s Larry King: “Have you ever had work done?” Anderson: “Why, yes, these are implants.” King: “Oh, they are?” Anderson laughs: a mix of exasperation and embarrassment. King, aggressive: “Are they, or aren’t they?” Anderson, sighing: “Yes, they are.”

    Here’s an exchange with a paparazzo outside the Viper Rooms at 2am the first time she went out after the birth of her son Brandon in 1996. Anderson: “How dare you spray fucking pepper spray [at me].” Pap: “You’re drunk, sweetie. Where’s your child this time of the morning?” Shouting: “Where. Is. Your. Baby?” Anderson: “With my mother, you fucking asshole.”

    After the tape was stolen, things got darker still. She repeatedly told her “friend” Jay Leno in 1996 that his jokes about the tape were “not funny”: “This is devastating to us.” But Leno was not listening. No one was listening. Anderson was visibly upset, but stayed plucky. It’s as if she believes that if she keeps telling the truth, keeps being her nice, funny, sweet self, people will check themselves. And what were her alternatives if she wanted to get on with her career and survive?

    When it became clear no one was interested in moving on, that the typecast was eternal, Anderson tried something else. She’d take the insults, the caricaturing, she’d take them with a big bold smile, but she wouldn’t take the money. In 2005, Comedy Central asked her to do a Roast. “I said I would do it but only if they gave $250,000 to Peta [People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals].” She was introduced thus: “Thank you for agreeing to get fucked on camera one last time.” The cartoon had taken over.


    Pamela Anderson was 22, with scrunch-dried hair and a tiny waist, when she was spotted at a Canadian football game by a Labatt’s Beer scout and made into their Blue Zone Girl. Back then, there was something unnameable and natural in her charm that read as simultaneously ordinary and, to a certain type of man, pure dripping sex. In Los Angeles, Playboy’s picture editor Marilyn Grabowski came across her image, stubbed out her cigarette and picked up the telephone.

    In Vancouver, Anderson was working in a tanning salon and living with a photographer called Michael. A previous boyfriend had thrown her out of a moving car, but Michael was a cheat. “When you see your boyfriend washing his penis in the sink, that’s a sign that they’re probably having an affair,” she says, deadpan. “I wrote it down: ‘Washing penis in the sink: suspicious.’” On hearing the word Playboy, Michael “ran into the kitchen and threw a tray of silverware at my head”.

    A young Pamela Anderson as the Labatt’s Blue Zone Girl
    As the Labatt’s Blue Zone Girl. Photograph: Netflix

    She arrived in LA, her first time on a plane, and at the Playboy mansion she was whisked past 15ft portraits of naked women and into “beauty”, where her hair was put in tinfoil and her toes “rubbed and polished”. She had to be coaxed out of her underwear, “which I was hanging on to for dear life”, because wardrobe for her first shoot was a boater, school blazer and tie, and nothing else. Afterwards, she threw up.

    The mansion was heaving with actors, musicians, “philanthropists”, artists. She spied Tony Curtis, Scott Baio, James Caan, Sean Penn and Jack Nicholson alongside “beautiful women in long silk gowns, Monique St Pierre with cropped hair like Michelle Pfeiffer”. Standing there in her acid-wash jeans, Nirvana T-shirt and “those socks with the balls on the back”, Anderson thought: how can I be more like them? Kimberley Hefner confided: “You know they all have surgery?” “I was like: ‘Really? Where do I sign up?’ Not a lot of thinking went into that decision,” Anderson says, regretful. “Not a lot of thinking went into anything.”

    Try as I might – in person and follow-up emails – I cannot get Anderson to condemn Hugh Hefner as a dirty old pervert: one who played a founding role in the industrialisation of “glamour” model exploitation. Anderson is loyal to a fault. She views Playboy as an academy of sorts. She believes it helped young women, some of whom – possibly many, “I can only guess” ­– were escaping really bad stuff at home. She is generous, even after saying Hef would order them to get naked in the “grotto” – Playboy’s overheated pool – because “clothes lint gets in the filters”. “He was the first gentleman I ever met. The first person who spoke that way: ‘Darling, darling.’ The smoking jackets, the black tie; it was mysterious and theatrical. I’d never been anywhere where you wore a suit.” Plus, he offered to pay her properly: $15,000 to be the centrefold in February 1990.

    Pamela Anderson, looking over her left shoulder, arms round herself, in black dress against white background, December 2022
    ‘Not a lot of thinking went into the decision to have surgery. Not a lot of thinking went into anything.’ Photograph: Dylan Coulter/The Guardian

    Of the time in general, she says: “I was pretty naive.” But as her memoirs roll out story after gold-plated story of sexist excess, I think: who’d want to be worldly? Here, she first met producer Jon Peters who introduced himself with his achievements – Rain Man, Batman, A Star Is Born ­– before installing her in a house next to Ronald Reagan’s in Bel Air. He sent daily presents – from Cartier, Ralph Lauren, Azzedine Alaïa – by chauffeur. A backless tux like the one in Flashdance; jodhpurs and riding boots. She says it was like Pretty Woman. He gave her a Tiffany Filofax, a Cartier Tank watch, a diamond tennis bracelet. “He asked for head rubs and for me to tickle his neck, but no more than that,” she writes. She moved out on the advice of a friend.

    There were others. Someone offered $10,000 just to have a Jacuzzi with her (“That sounds more than a Jacuzzi,” she said, declining); someone else thousands a day to sit by a pool on a remote island (“I don’t think so”). Her ability to sidestep situations like this was less to do with savoir faire and more “because I was like Mr Magoo” – in other words, blind lucky. Famous men begged to meet her, not least Fidel Castro, president of Cuba. She missed a call from John F Kennedy Jr – whom she was “too shy” to call back. The actor Sylvester Stallone offered her a condo and a Porsche to be his No 1 girl. “And I was like: ‘Does that mean there’s a No 2?’”

    Grabowski described Anderson as “Playboy’s DNA”. Baywatch asked her to audition for their show 12 times – persisting even when she didn’t show up. She laughs now at her first notes from the director: “Pretend it’s real!” But once she was in that red bathing suit playing CJ, there was no looking back. Baywatch became the most watched TV series in the world, with weekly audiences of 1.1bn in 142 countries (many insisted on “Pamela clauses”, buying only episodes she was in).

    Pamela Anderson in red swimsuit in the 90s TV show Baywatch
    In 90s hit TV series Baywatch. Photograph: Rex/Shutterstock

    Her relationship with Mötley Crüe drummer Tommy Lee – they met on New Year’s Eve 1994, then he bombarded her with 40 or 50 calls a day before following her to a photoshoot in Cancún where they married four days later in their swimmers on a beach – was regurgitated in the recent Pam & Tommy miniseries starring Lily James. She feels “violated” by the makers, Hulu, who never got in touch. “How are they allowed to do that?” They purported to show her sympathetically but really it was another instance of her life pillaged for others’ profit. James played Anderson without any of her real-life moxie. “I heard she’d been nominated for an Emmy, but maybe that was a joke,” she says (it’s not). She backtracks. “It’s not her fault; it’s a job. But whoever created it – well, it just feels like something else stolen.”

    She had almost sidestepped Lee, too, telling the hotel if a tattooed man showed up not to let him in. Finally, she caved, agreeing to meet for a drink – into which he’d slipped Ecstasy. “I didn’t even know what it was.”

    All the red flags, I say, and she sighs. She sighs a lot when talking about Lee. “Yes, well. But the love of my life was Tommy. And I know it wasn’t perfect but, you know, no one’s perfect.” We both laugh. “Oh OK, perfect for me. Two imperfect, crazy people. We made two beautiful babies and so I don’t have any regrets.”

    Certainly, they had a wild, childlike type of fun. Lee installed a swing above his piano where Anderson would sway naked while he played. They threw monster parties, but also tended the garden, played with their dogs. Then her workload exploded. Cast in a Barbarella reboot called Barb Wire, she began filming in the evening around her day job. To help with exhaustion, a girlfriend introduced her to ephedrine and “I liked how the pills kept me awake and I could get a lot done.”

    Bigger red flags came next. Lee would arrive on set every day, claiming “wife time”. “Tommy was so jealous,” she says. “I thought that’s what love is.” When they saw his black Ferrari Testarossa coming, the crew changed the scripts because Lee would stand behind the camera and glower at any suggestion of male contact. In her journal, she wrote of one Baywatch scene: “I had to kiss David Chokachi but I didn’t tell Tommy. He lost it. He trashed my trailer on the set, put his fist through a cabinet. I apologised for not telling him – lying, as he put it – and told him it wouldn’t happen again.” But after another outburst, when Lee rammed his car into the makeup trailer before going awol, Anderson tried to overdose on vodka and Advil. A suicide attempt? “I wanted it to be over a few times.” At the hospital, her younger brother Gerry, whom she’d moved to LA and who was working as an extra on Baywatch, confronted Lee, telling him he was killing his sister and her career.

    Pamela Anderson holding pink fabric in front of her, against white background, December 2022
    ‘The lawyers basically said: you’re in Playboy. You have no right to privacy.’ Photograph: Dylan Coulter/The Guardian. Chiffon: ISW

    Bob Guccione of Penthouse offered her $5m for the rights to the tape; she told him to go fuck himself. She has no regrets; she never wanted a dime from that film. Pregnant with her second child, she tried to sue IEG, the illegal distributors, for invasion of privacy. She learned the hard way that she had no rights. “I didn’t know that I was going to be completely humiliated. I remember walking into the room – all these guys in there. They had all these naked pictures of me. And the lawyers basically said: you’re in Playboy. You have no right to privacy.”

    Believing they used the deposition as cover, she says they asked her explicit questions about her sex life: where she liked to do it, her preferences, her body parts. She says they made her feel “horrible”, “a piece of meat”; “that this should mean nothing to me because I’m such a whore”. It reminded her of being 12 again, when she was raped by a 24-year-old friend of a friend. “And not to bring up something heavy from my childhood, but when I was attacked by this guy, I thought everybody would know. When the tape was stolen, it felt like that. And the deposition was so brutal.” I ask if she has talked about that feeling of being raped all over again and she says it was hard “to squeeze into a [David] Letterman interview when all they want to talk about is your boobs”.

    Brandon Lee, Pamela Anderson and Dylan Lee attend the Saint Laurent show at The Hollywood Palladium on February 10, 2016 in Los Angeles, California.
    ‘Despite the gene pool, they’re perfect gentlemen’: with sons Brandon and Dylan Lee, 2016. Photograph: Gregg DeGuire/WireImage

    One night in 1998, while she was dealing with their two small kids, Lee was rocking on the floor wailing: “I want my wife back.” “I need some fucking help around here,” she told him. “You gotta grow up. It’s not about you any more.” She saw his expression turn black. Later that night Lee was arrested for spousal and child abuse, and served six months in jail for battery. Anderson filed for divorce. Lee blamed stress: the tape, the kids and the fact that “Tommy comes third now instead of first; I don’t know how to deal with that”.

    Writing her memoirs, Anderson realised the stark similarities with her own parents’ marriage. Carol, a waitress at Smitty’s Pancake House, “was the blonde bombshell”; Barry, whom she calls a “poker player, chimney sweep and conman”, was a “bad boy on a motorcycle, cigarettes up in his sleeve, hair slicked back, crashing cars and in and out of trouble”. Anderson knew when to take Gerry, four years younger, out of harm’s way of their parents’ screaming. On return, they’d be “up against the wall or on top of the table just kissing, throwing themselves in the [bed]room, slamming the door. And we thought: OK, well, that’s better. It felt like the same energy, though.” More than once, Carol bundled them up and left. For a while, they lived on welfare in another town, but Pamela answered the telephone one day. It was her dad, asking the address. A lot of anger was unlocked in the process of writing, she says. A voice would come out of her that was “just crazy”. “I mean, I never felt so much rage in my life. It was a release but exhausting.” Both parents are still alive, although Barry suffered a stroke three years ago.

    Anderson knows jealousy is a big theme in her relationships – Kid Rock was so jealous of her friendship with the photographer David LaChapelle that he refused to believe he was gay. LaChapelle and the artist Daniel Lismore both offered to marry her to save her from heterosexual men. “I said: ‘I can’t do that to my mother. I can’t marry my gay best friends.’ David’s like: ‘We will be together for ever. You can do what you want, I can do what I want, and we’ll be this crazy interesting couple … ’” Her voice drifts off in semi-comedic despair.

    Daniel Lismore, Pamela Anderson and David LaChapelle ‘The Winter’s Tale’ press night, London, UK - 27 Feb 2017
    Pamela Anderson and Dame Vivienne Westwood attend the Andreas Kronthaler For Vivienne Westwood Womenswear Spring/Summer 2020 show as part of Paris Fashion Week on September 28, 2019 in Paris, France
    With friends Daniel Lismore and David LaChapelle in 2017 (top) and Vivienne Westwood in 2019 (above). Photographs: Piers Allardyce/Shutterstock; David M Benett/Getty Images

    Increasingly she surrounded herself with like-minded outcasts, among them singer Courtney Love and designer Vivienne Westwood. After Westwood’s death in December, Anderson emails me a poem she’s written in tribute. Westwood was “like a big sister, more than a friend. She was a guiding light and she and I were aligned in our love for people and the planet.” It was Westwood who introduced her to Julian Assange. Her visits to the Ecuadorian embassy, wearing cocktail dresses and carrying vegan rescue parcels, became infamous. No one knew quite how to read their relationship. She said she loved him – “I still do. He’s so funny. Kind of like nerdy funny. He repeats a joke two or three times – we get it, Julian.”

    In the book she calls him “sexy” and says that once, after sharing a bottle of mezcal, “we passed out, and I woke at four in the morning with his cat on my chest. We’d fallen asleep following a slightly frisky, fun, alcohol-induced night.” When I ask about it, she teases: “We were close, but I didn’t say it wasn’t platonic.” He asked her to marry him. “He was joking. He goes: ‘We should get married on the steps of the embassy. I wonder if they’d arrest me?’ Then, ‘But why give up one prison for another?’” She lets out a high laugh. (Four years later, Assange married his lawyer Stella Moris.)

    Pamela Anderson in black dress against white background, December 2022
    Photograph: Dylan Coulter/The Guardian. Styling: Alison Edmond. Hair: Sara Tintari. Makeup: Eileen Madrid. Dress: Maggie Marilyn

    She knows she’s a romantic, a magical thinker, a people-pleaser who loves chivalry, fairytales and relationships that rub her codependence all the wrong ways. But she’s also smart. She loves writing – her website has a section on “journaling” that includes her poems – and reading: Sylvia Plath, Anaïs Nin, Virginia Woolf, Doris Lessing. “I used to always carry Emily Dickinson.” She loves music and art; Nick Cave and Frida Kahlo.

    Her sons wanted her to make the documentary because they were fed up with people maligning her, not understanding who she actually was, fed up of having to defend her, all the way back to when they were fighting for her honour in the playground. “They didn’t deserve all the drama,” she says. “But, despite the gene pool, they’re perfect gentlemen. Looking at them today I get a little choked up because they’re such good men.”

    The process of going back over her life has made her think. “Holy cow. How did I get through all that? How did I make those choices? But I also have empathy for myself. I see that I just didn’t have the tools,” she says. From now on, she needs to find her own way through so she doesn’t “make the same mistakes” all over. “I’m really clear on being alone for at least a year. It’s been scary.” She sold her house in Malibu and retreated to Canada, completely alone. “I haven’t been near my friends hardly at all, either. The capacity to be alone is the capacity to love, right? But this is going to be good for me. I’m going to be able to get through it, because now with the documentary and the book, people will see the whole character. And then – maybe – I can become a human being again.”

    Pamela, a Love Story, will launch on Netflix on 31 January.

    [ad_2]
    #therapist #happened #Pamela #Anderson #chewed #spat #fame
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )