Tag: freedom

  • The House Freedom Caucus laid down the first marker in debt-limit negotiations this morning. The group’s leader says the influential bloc is open to ideas, though.

    The House Freedom Caucus laid down the first marker in debt-limit negotiations this morning. The group’s leader says the influential bloc is open to ideas, though.

    [ad_1]

    20230310 freedom 1 francis 1
    “Who said red lines? Did anybody say red lines?” Scott Perry said in an interview.

    [ad_2]
    #House #Freedom #Caucus #laid #marker #debtlimit #negotiations #morning #groups #leader #influential #bloc #open #ideas
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • DeSantis is championing medical freedom. GOP state lawmakers like what they see.

    DeSantis is championing medical freedom. GOP state lawmakers like what they see.

    [ad_1]

    DeSantis’ attention to the issue is having real-world impact — and not just in Florida. GOP lawmakers across the country, in some cases emboldened by DeSantis’ ramped-up rhetoric, have introduced hundreds of bills this year under the medical freedom banner, including proposals to put lawmakers in charge of immunization requirements, ban the government from creating non-school-based vaccine mandates and allow citizens to challenge public health disaster declarations.

    “Governor DeSantis has been leading the way,” said Texas state Rep. Matt Schaefer, chair of the Texas Freedom Caucus, who sponsored his state’s public health disaster declaration bill. “A lot of people are looking to DeSantis to see what he’s doing at this point, and it gives cover to other governors, I think, to step out there.”

    DeSantis’ spotlight on medical freedom, which grew in popularity during the pandemic, comes as routine childhood vaccine rates are dropping and trust in government and science is low. Public health experts fear the entrenched political polarization around vaccinations and public health will lead to eliminated diseases, such as polio and measles, gaining footholds in communities and diminish the nation’s ability to respond effectively to future health crises.

    The momentum also highlights one of DeSantis’ biggest strengths heading into the 2024 election cycle: his handling of Covid-19 in the third-most populous state. Conservatives across the country have praised DeSantis’ rejection of vaccine mandates and masking students in schools, fueling the governor’s popularity.

    “If he runs, it’s just going to bring more prominence to this ideology, and that’s my concern,” said Rupali Limaye, an associate professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “This idea of — we are going to reject, essentially, anything that is science-based because that’s part of our identity. The government can’t tell us what’s true, what’s not true. We make our own decisions. We make our own truth.”

    Most of the medical freedom bills introduced in statehouses this year aren’t likely to go anywhere, observers say, but their volume speaks to the backlash federal pandemic policies engendered and how DeSantis’ proposals could be the inevitable result of so many Americans losing trust in local, state and federal health officials.

    “I think he’s presenting an alternative. Is the alternative being presented in a political way? Yes. That doesn’t make it less valid,” said Brian Miller, a non-resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. “Taking a different approach in public health requires a lot of guts. The public health community has historically not done a good job in integrating centrist, conservative and libertarian viewpoints.”

    Jeremy Redfern, DeSantis’ deputy press secretary, said that recent research raising questions about the efficacy of masks in preventing infection indicates that when it comes to getting rid of mask mandates, “Governor DeSantis was right all along.”

    And while state lawmakers around the country who have been committed to medical freedom since before the pandemic see DeSantis as a relative newcomer to the movement, they welcome the national attention he brings.

    “I definitely appreciate his effort to do that,” said Indiana GOP state Rep. Becky Cash. “Quite honestly, if he’s going to run for president, I like what I see.”

    DeSantis’ adroitness at positioning himself as a national leader in a series of high-profile culture war issues has helped secure him a spot as one of the country’s most popular governors — and most powerful Republicans.

    He’s used funds linked to Covid-19 relief to transport migrants on airplanes from Texas to the liberal enclave of Martha’s Vineyard, traveled to blue states to talk about rising crime, undermined Disney’s special tax status after the company rebuked Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill, restricted abortion rights, targeted gender-affirming care and barred high school students from taking a new advanced placement course on African American studies.

    The stance that DeSantis, a leading skeptic of masks and lockdowns, has taken on “protecting Floridians from the biomedical security state” and his attacks on former White House chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci, have earned him wide acclaim on the right and plenty of leeway from Florida’s GOP supermajority legislature which, during a 2021 special session, passed a law banning Covid vaccine mandates.

    “He’s never been wrong,” said Florida House Health and Human Services Committee Chair Randy Fine, a Republican. He added that DeSantis’ policy will have no problem clearing the Republican-controlled House. “What would make anyone think he’s wrong now?”

    Some Florida physicians worry DeSantis’ efforts are putting Floridians at risk. Routine vaccinations among Florida kindergartners have been dropping, with fewer kids being immunized against measles, polio, chickenpox and diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis.

    “We have an incredible amount of vaccine hesitancy that has only grown worse,” said Greg Savel, a pediatrician in Clearwater, Fla. “Whatever Governor DeSantis says goes around here.”

    And while DeSantis is garnering most of the attention, the positions he espouses have been quietly gaining ground outside of Florida.

    Between January 2021 and May 2022, legislators enacted 65 laws in 25 states that now limit public health authorities’ power to react during an emergency, according to research by Temple University.

    This year, state lawmakers have introduced more than 400 bills promoting a small-government vision for public health, according to the National Academy for State Health Policy. Some are Covid-specific, such as a bill in Indiana that would prohibit employers from requiring routine testing for the virus, and a bill in Idaho that would prevent the government from mandating the Covid vaccine to receive government services, enter a government venue or work for the state.

    Other proposals would make significant changes to the mandate-driven approach to public health.

    Schaefer’s bill in Texas, for instance, would allow individuals to challenge any disaster, public health disaster, public health emergency or control measure order issued by the governor “if the provision is alleged to cause injury to the person or burden a right of the person that is protected by the state or federal constitution or by a state or federal law.”

    “It is the historical legal tradition of the United States of America that when your rights are infringed, there’s some way to get into a court and get a hearing, even a preliminary hearing. There’s some due processes that’s involved. But in Texas, and I’m sure in many other states as well, no one could get standing,” Schaefer said. “A lot of this is just simply restoring due process.”

    Two bills in Mississippi, meanwhile, would require state health officer orders to be approved by the governor. Legislation in Iowa would prohibit health officials from conducting contact tracing; a proposal in Wyoming would prohibit the use of CDC and WHO requirements, mandates, recommendations, instructions or guidance to justify mask, vaccine or medical testing requirements and a bill in Idaho would make it a misdemeanor to administer any mRNA-based vaccine.

    Several states — Indiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Texas — have also introduced bills that would take the power to set school-based immunization requirements away from state health officials and put it in the hands of the legislature.

    Lawmakers who have long been involved with the medical freedom movement say they’re starting to see more interest from their GOP colleagues in embracing the issue.

    “We’re trying to do what Governor DeSantis is doing there,” Cash said. “God bless Governor DeSantis for what he’s doing, but it’s coming from the executive branch, and we really need legislative branches, that are elected by the people, to make the laws to do this.”

    The question of individual freedom versus federal and state power to impose measures to protect the public’s health has also shown up in court. In most cases, public health authorities were upheld, but there were a series of high-profile and potentially influential wins for supporters of religious liberty and those who seek to limit the scope of health authorities, including in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Florida, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Those wins would not have escaped DeSantis’ attention, said Wendy Parmet, faculty co-director at the Center for Health Policy and Law at Northeastern University. But, she added, he’s playing “a precarious game.”

    “You don’t know how serious the next problem is going to be,” she said. “You don’t know how it’s going to be transmitted. You don’t know the groups who will be most affected. You want to say the health department can’t close schools, but what if the next pandemic has a 50 percent fatality rate for kids, but adults are fine?”

    [ad_2]
    #DeSantis #championing #medical #freedom #GOP #state #lawmakers
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Press Freedom in India – Foreign correspondent’s survey spills the bean

    Press Freedom in India – Foreign correspondent’s survey spills the bean

    [ad_1]

    The Foreign Correspondents’ Club in Delhi has done three surveys with a foreign journalist based in Delhi that has some startling revelation that reflects on the freedom of the press in India.

    The three surveys conducted from 2020 to 2022 were shared with the Ministry of External Affairs but there was no response from the ministry that further puts a question mark on press freedom in India.

    Even though the foreign correspondent club did not make their survey public but it somehow got and now has come into the public domain.

    The first survey was carried out in January 2020, in which 40 journalists participated. This was in the aftermath of August 5, 2019, when Jammu and Kashmir were made a Union Territory. This was also the time when National Citizenship Register was released in Assam.

    The foreign journalists who wanted to cover these two momentous events in India were denied travel permits to travel to J&K or Assam.

    In the first survey, the foreign journalists allege they have been facing problems such as denial of travel permits, visa uncertainty, and deportation threats, etc. Many respondents attributed their harassment due to their critical reporting of the government on several issues in India.

    One of the respondents told that the government wanted to suppress coverage of the persecution of Muslims in India. A journalist said the Indian Embassy 2020 emailed to his publication in his home country “not to cover Muslim persecution.

    Many in the survey stated that they had been “summoned” by officials in the ministry and were shown “files” and “spreadsheets” detailing their “negative coverage.” The government officials accused the foreign journalist of “having an agenda”.

    The second survey was conducted in April 2021 when 41 journalists participated. Here also the visa issue was the main handle to harass the journalist. The journalists who were critical of the government were given two to four months’ visas and for its extension, they had to run from pallor to post.

    One journalist was told that he will get a visa extension only if he writes positive stories on Narendra Modi. In the year 2021, 96% of the foreign journalist who applied for the permit for Assam and Jammu and Kashmir were denied a such permit.

    Of the 30 foreign journalists who had applied for travel permits in 2019 to report from Kashmir and Assam, only 9 got any response.

    Several journalists told that they were summoned by officials for their “coverage of “Kashmir”. A foreign journalist alleged that he was put back on a plane by Assam authorities in September 2019, when he went to report from there.

    A third survey was conducted in February 2022 in which 21 foreign correspondents participated. The thin attendance was due to poor response from the government to improve the working conditions of foreign press reporters in India.

    The third survey mirrored the previous two surveys. Not a single participant who applied for a special reporting permit in 2021 got the permit to travel to troubled places.

    Further, the level of intimidation rose from the first survey to the third. A journalist claimed to have been “followed, interrogated”, and their “interviewee threatened” while covering a story on the persecution of Christians in Karnataka.

    Another journalist alleged “physical threats” and “threats of deportation” along with Visa extensions intimidation remain common methods to harass foreign journalists in India.

    According to the latest guidelines of the external affairs ministry shared with foreign correspondents, the restricted and protected places now include all eight North Eastern states, the whole of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Andaman and Nicobar Island, Lakshadweep, and “international border areas” in Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Rajasthan.

    [ad_2]
    #Press #Freedom #India #Foreign #correspondents #survey #spills #bean

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Eduardo Verástegui presents the film “Sounds of Freedom” in Culiacán

    [ad_1]

    Mexican actor and producer Eduardo Verastegui visited Culiacán to promote his new film “Sounds of Freedom” directed byr Alejandro Monteverde. The film tells the true story of Timothy Ballard, played by Jim Caviezel, who quit his US government job at the US Department of Homeland Security, to help save the lives of thousands of children. of human trafficking.

    The actor and now producer of the film mentioned in a talk about his project in which he calls on the population about the problem of child sexual abuse in Mexico, one of the countries where the largest number of offenses are committed. “More than 21,000 children are exploited, it is a national and global problem, particularly in Mexico and the United States, sadly they are countries with the highest number of providers in child exploitation”, mentioned.

    Verástegui raises his voice and calls on society to eradicate the problem of the disappearance of girls and boys, their destiny to be victims of pornography and sexual exploitation. “The importance of the film, this tape not only opens your eyes, it moves your heart and we have to work together to put an end to this situation of reality that we live in, children are not for sale,” he said.

    It may interest you:

    The movie Sounds of Freedom starring r Jim Caviezel, Mira Sorvino and Bill Camp It will be released in the next seven months in movie theaters.

    Bachelor of Communication Sciences, graduated from the University of the Gulf of Mexico in the city of Culiacán, Sinaloa. She is currently the entertainment editor of the newspaper EL DEBATE. She began her work in the media in 2013 on television, covering both local news and shows. In October 2015, she started at the editorial house of EL DEBATE as a web reporter, writing news for the local, national, police, show and international sections. Until April 2017, she changed as an entertainment reporter, covering concerts in the city, palenque of the Livestock Fair, plays and entertainment press conferences. She currently conducts exclusive interviews with responsibility for artists of local, national and international stature. She has also covered book launches in Mexico City. Her main hobby is listening to music, movies, photography and visiting museums.

    see more

    #Eduardo #Verástegui #presents #film #Sounds #Freedom #Culiacán

    [ad_2]
    #Eduardo #Verástegui #presents #film #Sounds #Freedom #Culiacán
    ( With inputs from : pledgetimes.com )

  • BBC cannot hide ‘economic offences’ under garb of freedom of expression: BJP

    BBC cannot hide ‘economic offences’ under garb of freedom of expression: BJP

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The BJP said on Wednesday the BBC or any other organisation cannot hide their “economic offences” under the garb of freedom of expression.

    The British broadcaster is under the Income-Tax department probe for alleged tax avoidance by underreporting income and these are serious offences, BJP’s information technology department head Amit Malviya said.

    The BBC has to abide by Indian laws to operate in the country, he said.

    The BJP reaction came following the British government’s strong defence of the BBC and its editorial freedom in Parliament after the Income Tax department’s survey operations on the media corporation’s New Delhi and Mumbai offices last week.

    The BBC has said it is fully cooperating with the investigation and hopes to have the situation resolved as soon as possible.

    Malviya claimed that the international broadcaster has a chequered past and accused it of trying to meddle in the internal affairs of democracies, including India.

    He said that it once showed Russian tanks in Chechnya as Indian tanks in Kashmir to “suit its propaganda”.

    Malviya said India is the “mother of democracy” and has a strong judicial system to ensure freedom of expression.

    The I-T department had said in a statement following the survey that the income and profits disclosed by the organisation’s units were “not commensurate with the scale of operations in India”.

    A Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) junior minister responded to an urgent question raised in the House of Commons in London on Tuesday to say that the government cannot comment on the allegations made by the I-T department over an ongoing investigation but stressed that media freedom and freedom of speech are essential elements of robust democracies.

    [ad_2]
    #BBC #hide #economic #offences #garb #freedom #expression #BJP

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Trudeau’s ‘Freedom Convoy’ shutdown was justified, inquiry rules

    Trudeau’s ‘Freedom Convoy’ shutdown was justified, inquiry rules

    [ad_1]

    The commissioner highlighted lapses in policing, intelligence and federalism, as well as “the failure to anticipate such a moment and to properly manage the legitimate protests that emerged, especially the protest in Ottawa.”

    Trudeau said his government didn’t want to invoke the Emergencies Act a year ago, but the longer the protests dragged on, concerns about violence, potentially spurred by ideologically motivated violent extremism, grew.

    “It was unfortunate, it was undesirable, we didn’t want to do it,” he told reporters Friday afternoon on Parliament Hill. “But we’d gotten to a place where there was no other choice.”

    Rouleau’s government-friendly conclusion wasn’t a slam dunk.

    “I do not come to this conclusion easily, as I do not consider the factual basis for it to be overwhelming and I acknowledge that there is significant strength to the arguments against reaching it,” he wrote.

    Still, Rouleau agreed with the federal government’s arguments on most points of contention that arose during six weeks of public hearings.

    The government shielded the legal opinion that guided Cabinet’s decision to invoke by citing solicitor-client privilege. Lawyers who represented civil rights groups at the commission insisted Cabinet should waive that privilege and reveal that key legal guidance.

    Rouleau sided with the government. “I do not need to see the legal advice itself in order to accept the evidence that [Cabinet] believed their conclusion to be justified in law.”

    Convoy organizers have always maintained that protests were largely peaceful. Rouleau accepted that reports of “serious, widespread violence” never materialized at protest sites, and acknowledged violent acts “might have been avoided” without a declaration of emergency.

    “That it might have been avoided does not, however, make the decision wrong,” Rouleau countered, writing that “substantial grounds” supported Cabinet’s concern based on “compelling and credible” information.

    Trudeau’s Cabinet also took heat for its interpretation of a national security threat.

    At the height of the protests, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service did not conclude the protests posed a threat to the security of Canada, according to the threshold set out in the CSIS Act that guides the agency.

    Cabinet came to a different conclusion, even though the same definition of a national security threat appears in the Emergencies Act. CSIS director David Vigneault testified at the hearings that he agreed with Cabinet’s invocation of emergency powers.

    In his own testimony, Trudeau insisted the same definition appears in two places — but what matters most is “who is doing the interpretation, what inputs come in, and what is the purpose of it?”

    Rouleau agreed with the prime minister’s view. “Two different decision makers, each interpreting the same words in the context of different statutes, can reasonably come to different conclusions as to whether the threshold is met,” he wrote.

    The commissioner also agreed that most of the powers invoked were appropriate and effective, including most of the controversial measures that allowed financial institutions to freeze protesters’ assets.

    Trudeau said his government would respond to Rouleau’s report, and its 56 recommendations, within six months.

    Here are six takeaways from Rouleau’s landmark report:

    There were communication failures

    In a televised address ahead of the convoy’s arrival, Trudeau referenced a “small fringe minority,” comments that energized protesters, Rouleau says.

    Opposition Conservatives have accused the prime minister of using the pandemic to divide Canadians.

    On Friday, Trudeau expressed rare contrition. “I wish I had phrased it differently,” he said, reflecting on how protesters were a “small subset of people who were just hurting and worried and wanting to be heard.”

    Government leaders at all levels should have worked harder to acknowledge that most protesters were exercising their democratic rights, the report concludes.

    “Messaging by politicians, public officials and, to some extent, the media, should have been more balanced, and drawn a clearer distinction between those who were protesting peacefully and those who were not.”

    Ottawa’s police chief was scapegoated

    Although the inquiry spotlight was on Ottawa Police Chief Peter Sloly, Rouleau says it would be inconsistent with evidence to blame him alone for policing failures.

    “Some errors on Chief Sloly’s part were unduly enlarged by others to a degree that suggests scapegoating,” the report concludes. “He was rarely given the benefit of the doubt as to his intentions.”

    Sloly’s decision to resign during the occupation did remove an obstacle to resolution, Rouleau notes.

    Ontario was missing in action

    Ontario Premier Doug Ford and his government did not fully engage during the crisis, the report concludes. “Many witnesses saw the province as trying to avoid responsibility for responding to a crisis within its borders,” Rouleau writes.

    The justice notes that it was the blockade of the Ambassador Bridge in Windsor — “the single most important commercial land crossing in Canada” — that spurred the province to action. Only after a Feb. 9 conversation between Trudeau and Ford did collaboration “become the name of the game,” he says.

    Ford and his solicitor general, Sylvia Jones, refused to be interviewed by the Commission counsel.

    Asset freezing had pros and cons

    Rouleau concludes the emergency measures that allowed the assets of protesters to be frozen was an effective measure that helped to shorten their stay in Ottawa.

    “The absence of a delisting mechanism is more troubling,” Rouleau writes, criticizing the absence of one for sowing confusion among the financial institutions tasked with freezing the assets.

    “If one of the objectives of the freezing regime was to convince people to leave protests sites, the regime should have had a mechanism to unfreeze accounts once people complied,” he wrote.

    Rouleau called one aspect of the asset-freezing regime — the suspension of vehicle insurance — “inappropriate in principle.” Though it wasn’t enforced, the report raised alarm over its safety implications if protesters had their insurance suspended and were to get in an accident after leaving Ottawa in an uninsured vehicle.

    Concerns about American involvement were “reasonable”

    The protests found an audience in the United States willing to donate to the Canadian cause.

    Roughly 59 percent of the donors who gave money to the Freedom Convoy’s campaign on GiveSendGo, a Christian fundraising site, came from the United States, with 35 percent of the donations originating from Canada.

    Americans also joined from afar with interference campaigns to jam essential services.

    “Calls originating from the United States had flooded emergency 911 call centres in Ottawa,” Rouleau writes in his report. The situation came up during calls between Trudeau and President Joe Biden.

    “It was reasonable to consider that individuals would come to Canada to physically join the protests, and it was appropriate to take measures to prevent this.”

    Misinformation and disinformation played a complicated role

    The report says social media played a critical role in shaping the Freedom Convoy.

    “False beliefs that Covid-19 vaccines manipulate DNA, social media feeds rife with homophobic or racist content, and inaccurate reporting of important events all features in the evidence before me,” Rouleau writes. “Some views were outright conspiratorial.”

    [ad_2]
    #Trudeaus #Freedom #Convoy #shutdown #justified #inquiry #rules
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • India’s press freedom index has fallen: Congress

    India’s press freedom index has fallen: Congress

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Congress on Wednesday criticised the Centre for the Income Tax department raids on BBC offices, and alleged that due to its high-handedness the press freedom index has fallen to 150.

    Addressing a press conference here, Pawan Khera, party’s media department chairman said, “Infact, India has a dubious position of 150th in the Press Freedom Index. 135 journalists in India were arrested, interrogated, or detained from 2014 to 2020. (As per Free Speech Collective) 37 Journalists have been killed in India since 2014 as UNESCO observatory of killed journalists.”

    He said that the Indian media has been “repeatedly strangulated, muzzled and bulldozed by the Modi government just because some of them (and a very small minority of them) have refused to toe the line of the BJP”.

    “When Modi ji was dreaming of becoming the Prime Minister of this country, then he was a dedicated follower of the same BBC.

    “When the Prime Minister gets an award then you boast about it using your PR machinery to the whole wide world! And if the same media outlets, if the same international media sets your “record” straight, then you unleash your arrogance of power

    “The party which licked the soles of the British, the party whose ideological flag bearers acted as British informers, those who pleaded clemency to the British crown, whilst Indian people were on streets peacefully fighting them, – has now suddenly started speaking against the British? Why? Is it because the real truth of Modi ji’s role in the Gujarat riots, known to every Indian, now stands exposed, yet another time!”

    [ad_2]
    #Indias #press #freedom #index #fallen #Congress

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • On BBC searches, US invokes freedom of press

    On BBC searches, US invokes freedom of press

    [ad_1]

    Washington: The US has reaffirmed its conviction that “free press strengthens democracy” as a general rule without seeking to impose its views directly on the searches of BBC offices by income tax authorities in Delhi and Mumbai.

    “I would need to refer you to Indian authorities for the details of this search,” State Department Spokesperson Ned Price said in a response to a question at the daily press briefing.

    ” Beyond this discrete action, what I’ll say more broadly is the general point that I’ve consistently made in this context, but in a universal context as well: We support the importance of free press around the world. We continue to highlight the importance of freedom of expression and freedom of religion or belief as human rights that contribute to strengthening democracies around the world. It has strengthened this democracy here in this country; it has strengthened India’s democracy. These universal rights are the bedrock of democracies around the world.”

    Pressed further, Price said, “We’re aware of the facts of these searches, but I’m just not in a position to offer a judgement.”

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #BBC #searches #invokes #freedom #press

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Operations at BBC offices ‘affront to freedom of expression'”: Global watchdogs

    Operations at BBC offices ‘affront to freedom of expression’”: Global watchdogs

    [ad_1]

    New York: Global media watchdogs and human rights bodies on Tuesday criticised the Indian government’s income tax survey operations at the BBC’s offices in New Delhi and Mumbai, saying the action “smacks of intimidation” and was a “blatant affront” to freedom of expression.

    The Income Tax officials described the action as part of an investigation into alleged tax evasion.

    Reacting to the Indian IT department’s action, the UK-based British public broadcaster said that it was “fully cooperating” with the authorities and hoped that the situation will be resolved “as soon as possible”.

    The New York-based independent non-profit Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) urged the Indian government to stop harassing journalists.

    Its Asia programme coordinator Beh Lih Yi said: “Raiding the BBC’s India offices in the wake of a documentary criticising Prime Minister Narendra Modi smacks of intimidation”.

    “Indian authorities have used tax investigations as a pretext to target critical news outlets before, and must cease harassing BBC employees immediately, in line with the values of freedom that should be espoused in the world’s largest democracy,” CPJ said in a statement.

    “The searches by the tax authorities of the offices of @BBCWorld in #Inde , 3 weeks after the censorship of his documentary on @narendramodi, constitute an outrageous reprisal. RSF denounces these attempts to silence any criticism of the Indian government,” Paris-based Reporters Without Borders (RSF) tweeted.

    Amnesty International tweeted: “These raids are a blatant affront to freedom of expression.”

    “The Indian authorities are clearly trying to harass and intimidate the BBC over its critical coverage of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. The overbroad powers of the Income Tax Department are repeatedly being weaponised to silence dissent. Last year, tax officials also raided the offices of a number of NGOs, including Oxfam India. These intimidatory acts, which undermine the right to freedom of expression in India, must end now,” it said in a statement.

    The South Asia Solidarity Group, a human rights organisation based in the UK, dubbed it a “blatantly vindictive move”.

    “In the wake of the government’s ban on sharing extracts or screening the documentary, this raid makes it clear that the Modi government will attack all those who criticise Narendra Modi, the BJP and those close to them,” said Mukti Shah, spokesperson for the group.

    In New Delhi, officials said the survey was being carried out to investigate issues related to international taxation and transfer pricing of BBC subsidiary companies, and alleged that the BBC had been served with notices in the past but was “defiant and non-compliant” and had significantly diverted its profits.

    The IT action against the BBC comes weeks after the broadcaster aired a controversial two-part documentary -“India: The Modi Question”- on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and 2002 Gujarat riots.

    The Indian government has branded the two-part series a “propaganda piece”, designed to push a particular “discredited narrative”.

    “The bias, lack of objectivity and continuing colonial mindset is blatantly visible,” the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said at the time it was aired in the UK last month.

    [ad_2]
    #Operations #BBC #offices #affront #freedom #expression #Global #watchdogs

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • No freedom for Islamic activities in any country like that in India: Muslim scholar

    No freedom for Islamic activities in any country like that in India: Muslim scholar

    [ad_1]

    Kozhikode: An Islamic scholar in Kerala on Saturday said there is no other country in the world where Islamic activities can be done freely like that in India and such kind of operational freedom is absent even in the so-called Muslim countries.

    Speaking at a programme in this northern district, he asked whether there was any other country which grants operational freedom for Muslim outfits like in our country.

    The statement of Ponmala Abdul Khader Musliyar, who belongs to the Muslims scholars’ body “Samastha Kerala Jem-iyyathul Ulama” (Samastha), came at a time when discussions are raging about religious freedom of minority communities in the country.

    “When you look at the world nations, (you can find that) there is no other country where Islamic activities are being done like that in India. In which countries are these organisational activities possible?” he said.

    Even among the familiar Gulf nations like UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia or in eastern countries like Singapore, Malaysia and so on, there is no other country suitable for our (Islamic) activities, he explained.

    Musliyar said in India, the Islamic outfits can operate from the grassroot level to any extent and it is not possible even in countries like Qatar, UAE or Saudi Arabia.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #freedom #Islamic #activities #country #India #Muslim #scholar

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )