Tag: decision

  • Democrats step up pressure on Biden to reverse Trump’s decision on space HQ

    Democrats step up pressure on Biden to reverse Trump’s decision on space HQ

    [ad_1]

    And one of the state’s senators is even seizing on the politics surrounding abortion and LGBTQ issues, arguing that sending the command from a blue state to a red one takes away the rights of service members.

    Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) “has raised the issue of reproductive health care access in his conversations about the Space Command basing decision,” said one congressional aide, who asked for anonymity to discuss private conversations between Bennet and the Pentagon.

    The senator, the aide added, “has serious concerns about the impact that abortion ban laws have on readiness and our national security.”

    It’s the latest turn in a saga that’s dragged on for three years after Trump personally directed the Air Force to choose Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama, as the command’s permanent headquarters. Alabama and Colorado were the two finalists in the Air Force’s search.

    The decision, if given the final signoff by the Biden administration, would uproot the fledgling command from its current location at Peterson Space Force Base in Colorado Springs. Since the original decision, members of Colorado’s delegation in both parties have decried the move to a Trump-friendly state as political favoritism that will delay the organization from achieving full operating status.

    “I haven’t found any Democratic senator who thinks it’s a good idea to allow a precedent to stand that encourages politics to overrule the judgment of our military command,” Colorado Sen. John Hickenlooper said in an interview.

    The Biden White House vowed to reassess the choice after lawmakers blasted the basing decision. The Air Force secretary must still determine whether to follow through with Trump’s decision or keep the command in Colorado.

    The Air Force was expected to announce a final decision at the end of 2022, but the deadline passed with no ruling.

    “We don’t have anything new on the decision timeline,” the service said in a statement. The service declined to say why a choice has not been made.

    Lawmakers on both sides of the argument say they’re in the dark on when the Air Force might finally make a call, but both states’ delegations have said they believe they will prevail.

    “I do think the delay is, in my view, a positive thing,” said Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.). “My read of that is that the administration is taking a harder look and a fresh look at it and revisiting certain elements of the decision. That’s what I hope they’re doing.”

    The commander, Gen. James Dickinson, has said Space Command won’t be fully operational until the final basing decision is made.

    Pros and cons

    U.S. Space Command was restarted by the Trump administration in 2019 as it sought to emphasize the importance of the military’s space mission, coinciding with the creation of the Space Force. Space Command, which oversees the operations of military space assets and defending satellites, had been its own outfit since the 1980s, but was folded into U.S. Strategic Command following the creation of Northern Command in 2002.

    Colorado Springs and Huntsville were two of six finalists selected by the Air Force in late 2020 for the permanent headquarters. The list included military installations in Florida, Nebraska, Texas and New Mexico.

    Colorado lawmakers contend permanently keeping Space Command in its temporary home is more efficient and will ultimately prove better for national security because it will be near Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command.

    With a large military space presence already in the state, Colorado’s leaders argue that politics alone was the deciding factor in the Trump administration selecting Alabama.

    They point to comments Trump made after leaving office boasting that he made the call to move Space Command.

    “I hope you know that. [They] said they were looking for a home and I single-handedly said ‘let’s go to Alabama.’ They wanted it. I said ‘let’s go to Alabama. I love Alabama.’” Trump said on an Alabama-based radio show in August 2021.

    Alabama’s almost entirely GOP delegation says Huntsville — dubbed Rocket City because of the large aerospace industry presence there — checks all the boxes for the new command.

    The Pentagon visited each of the six prospective headquarters sites between Dec. 8, 2020, and Jan. 7, 2021, where experts gathered data and refined cost estimates. Those cost estimates were not released publicly, according to the Defense Department’s inspector general.

    “Democrats said it was political, but the best place to put it is in Huntsville,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) said in an interview.

    “The only reason you would leave it in Colorado is because that’s where it’s at right now,” Tuberville said. “But we need to make sure it’s in the right spot. We have the missile defense. We have Redstone Arsenal, NASA. You name it, we got it.”

    Since a headquarters decision was announced in January 2021, both the Defense Department IG and the Government Accountability Office released reports that questioned whether the selection process was adequate.

    DoD IG found the Air Force base analysis that was conducted under the Trump administration’s direction “complied with law and policy” when selecting Alabama as the headquarters location, while the GAO asserted the service’s base location analysis had “significant shortfalls in its transparency and credibility.”

    Neither report determined whether Trump meddled in the decision.

    Both oversight groups agree a resolution was reached during a White House meeting with high-ranking officials on Jan. 11, 2021.

    Meeting attendees included the former president and top Pentagon leaders who have since left — the acting defense secretary, the vice chair of the Joint Chiefs, the Air Force secretary and the assistant secretary of the Air Force for installations, environment and energy.

    Days before the meeting, the Pentagon received new information that if Colorado was selected the military could renovate a building instead of having to construct a new one to house the new headquarters.

    But the Space Force did not deliver an updated estimate to Air Force officials ahead of the White House meeting, according to GAO.

    The Pentagon is keeping the cost estimates private and are not included in the GAO report because the information is designated as “sensitive and privileged.”

    Opting for renovation instead of new construction would allow for the command to reach full operational much sooner than the estimated six years.

    In interviews with the GAO, the head of Space Command, the top Space Force general, and the former vice Joint Chiefs chair, all said they conveyed in the meeting that the headquarters should remain in Colorado because that was the best way to reach full operational capability as quickly as possible.

    Bennet echoed the same concerns during a speech on the Senate floor this month.

    It is important the Biden administration not ratify “a political decision that was made in the last few days of the Trump administration,” Bennet said, referring to the former president dismissing the counsel of Pentagon officials who recommended the headquarters remain in Colorado.

    Bennet underscored it is not only expected to be cheaper and faster to keep Space Command in Colorado, but the military would not have to worry over the number of civilian workers who won’t opt to move to Alabama. Roughly 60 percent of the Space Command workforce are civilians, he said.

    “Decisions of this importance shouldn’t be made this way. It should be in the interest of our national security. And the Biden administration has the opportunity to restore the integrity of this process,” Bennet said.

    Renewed fight

    The Colorado delegation fought the move when it was initially announced, but had gone quiet in the following months. They rekindled their efforts last month when Hickenlooper and Bennet were the only Democrats to join Republicans in opposition to the confirmation of Brendan Owens, the nominee to oversee facilities and energy programs at the Pentagon. The pair said they opposed him because the Pentagon had brushed off their efforts to meet with Austin to discuss Space Command.

    Owens was still confirmed despite most Republicans also opposing him.

    Bennet also threatened to hold up other nominees to secure a meeting with Austin. Hickenlooper and Bennet met with Austin to discuss the decision on Jan. 26, though no resolution was reached.

    “He’s got a lot on his plate, so he wasn’t versed in the details of the issue,” Hickenlooper said. “But he listened very thoughtfully and I think he took it very seriously.”

    But Bennet continued to press the issue. A spokesperson said Bennet placed a hold on Ravi Chaudhary, Biden’s nominee to oversee Air Force installations. He dropped the hold this month after meeting separately with Chaudhary and Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall where he “reiterated his longstanding concerns” with the basing decision. The behind-the-scenes maneuvering has not been previously reported.

    Some opponents are also highlighting how the climate in the U.S. has changed since an initial decision was made in January 2021. Many Democrats are unsettled by moving service members from a blue to a red state after the Supreme Court dealt a blow to abortion rights last year.

    With the end of nationwide federal protections for abortion, many Democrats have raised the impacts on troops stationed in states where the procedure is now banned or significantly limited. Bennet has publicly raised similar concerns in the proposed Space Command move.

    “I’m deeply concerned about how the Dobbs decision and state abortion bans will affect Space Command’s workforce and readiness if the command leaves Colorado,” Bennet said in a statement to Military.com in August.

    Another driver for the Biden administration to keep the headquarters in Colorado and not move to a conservative state are rights for LGBTQ people.

    “It’s hard not to think about the dramatically more hostile environment in Alabama when it comes to reproductive rights and LGBTQ+ rights,” said one Democratic aide. “It’ll mean many of the civilians who work for Space Command may not move with it. And service members will be forced to move somewhere where they’ll lose those rights.”

    Though both Tuberville and Hickenlooper downplayed the role the Supreme Court decision would play in the basing move, the impact on troops has been in focus after the reversal of abortion protections under Roe v. Wade.

    Even Austin, who is usually not outspoken on political issues, moved to shore up troops’ access for abortion. He issued a memo in October directing the Pentagon to pay for service members to travel costs for abortions, though not for the procedure itself, arguing the “practical effects of recent changes” in laws will hurt military readiness.

    Formal policies issued this month cover travel costs for obtaining abortions as well as administrative leave, as many troops are stationed in states where the procedure is now illegal.

    Tuberville was among the GOP lawmakers who slammed the move. He vowed to hold up civilian Pentagon nominations as well as top military promotions over the new policy.

    The issue, however, isn’t purely about red states vs. blue states. If Space Command doesn’t move to Alabama, the headquarters will remain in reliably conservative Colorado Springs. The area and its military assets are represented by Republican Doug Lamborn, who chairs the House Armed Services Strategic Forces subcommittee. Lamborn has also criticized the move as one of political favoritism over national security needs.

    The state’s other two Republican House members, Reps. Ken Buck and Lauren Boebert, have also protested the decision and signed several letters with Democrats arguing to keep the command in Colorado.

    Yet if the Biden administration decides to reverse the earlier decision, it could open itself up to criticism that it’s making a political call, just like the Trump White House. A reversal also would draw pushback from Alabama’s delegation, including Rep. Mike Rogers, who has new tools at his disposal as the House Armed Services Committee chair.

    In the meantime, Alabama lawmakers are confident the Trump administration’s decision will be upheld.

    “Nobody’s saying, but they’ve done several more reviews on it in the last two years,” Tuberville said of the final decision. “And we’ve pretty much passed all the tests.”

    [ad_2]
    #Democrats #step #pressure #Biden #reverse #Trumps #decision #space
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • India is everything to me: Akshay Kumar on decision to renounce Canadian passport

    India is everything to me: Akshay Kumar on decision to renounce Canadian passport

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Bollywood star Akshay Kumar, who has often faced criticism over his Canadian citizenship, says India is everything to him and he has already applied for a change of passport.

    He feels bad when people say things without knowing the reason for him taking up Canadian citizenship, Akshay said in an interview in the first episode of the new season of Seedhi Baat on Aajtak.

    “India is everything to me… Whatever I have earned, whatever I have gained is from here. And I’m fortunate that I get a chance to give back. You feel bad when people say things without knowing anything…,” the 55-year-old star said.

    Akshay, known for his films such as “Hera Pheri”, “Namastey London”, “Toilet: Ek Prem Katha” and “Padman”, also spoke about a lean phase in his career when he delivered more than 15 flops. This was in the 1990s. The poor box office performance of his films pushed him to apply for Canadian citizenship, he said.

    “I thought that ‘bhai, my films are not working and one has to work’. I went there for work. My friend was in Canada and he said, ‘come here’. I applied and I got in.

    “I had just two films left for release and it is just luck that they both became superhit. My friend said, ‘go back, start working again’. I got some more films and I kept getting more work. I forgot that I had the passport. I never thought that I should get this passport changed but now yes, I have applied to get my passport changed.”

    Akshay’s citizenship became a topic of debate after an interview with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in April 2019 just before the Lok Sabha elections.

    [ad_2]
    #India #Akshay #Kumar #decision #renounce #Canadian #passport

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • ‘Irresponsible’: Blinken raps Putin decision to suspend nuclear treaty with U.S.

    ‘Irresponsible’: Blinken raps Putin decision to suspend nuclear treaty with U.S.

    [ad_1]

    greece us 40640

    The treaty is the last remaining nonproliferation agreement between the pair after another key nuclear accord, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, expired in 2019.

    On Tuesday, Putin announced that he’s suspending Moscow’s participation after accusing the U.S. of being involved in attempting to strike bases in Russia. He stopped short of a complete withdrawal, however.

    Putin made the remarks the same day Biden was in Poland to give a speech marking the one-year anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and one day after he made a surprise visit to Kyiv.

    The U.S. in January accused Russia of not complying with the treaty by not allowing the United States and NATO to inspect its nuclear facilities. The pact includes limits on systems such as intercontinental ballistic missiles and deployed nuclear warheads.

    “When the administration started, we extended New START because it was clearly in the security interest in our country and actually in the security interests of Russia,” Blinken said. “And that only underscores what an irresponsible action this is.”

    “Of course, we remain ready to talk about strategic arms limitations at any time with Russia,” Blinken added, “irrespective of anything else going on in the world.”

    [ad_2]
    #Irresponsible #Blinken #raps #Putin #decision #suspend #nuclear #treaty #U.S
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • ‘Irresponsible’: Blinken raps Putin decision to suspend nuclear treaty with U.S.

    ‘Irresponsible’: Blinken raps Putin decision to suspend nuclear treaty with U.S.

    [ad_1]

    greece us 40640

    The treaty is the last remaining nonproliferation agreement between the pair after another key nuclear accord, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, expired in 2019.

    On Tuesday, Putin announced that he’s suspending Moscow’s participation after accusing the U.S. of being involved in attempting to strike bases in Russia. He stopped short of a complete withdrawal, however.

    Putin made the remarks the same day Biden was in Poland to give a speech marking the one-year anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and one day after he made a surprise visit to Kyiv.

    The U.S. in January accused Russia of not complying with the treaty by not allowing the United States and NATO to inspect its nuclear facilities. The pact includes limits on systems such as intercontinental ballistic missiles and deployed nuclear warheads.

    “When the administration started, we extended New START because it was clearly in the security interest in our country and actually in the security interests of Russia,” Blinken said. “And that only underscores what an irresponsible action this is.”

    “Of course, we remain ready to talk about strategic arms limitations at any time with Russia,” Blinken added, “irrespective of anything else going on in the world.”

    [ad_2]
    #Irresponsible #Blinken #raps #Putin #decision #suspend #nuclear #treaty #U.S
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • SC agrees to examine Uddhav Thackeray plea against EC decision on Wednesday

    SC agrees to examine Uddhav Thackeray plea against EC decision on Wednesday

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear on Wednesday a plea by Uddhav Thackeray against the Election Commission of India (ECI) decision recognising the Eknath Shinde faction as the official Shiv Sena.

    Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Thackeray, submitted before a bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud that if the ECI order is not stayed then they will take over everything, bank accounts, etc. Sibal said, “My only request is, take up the matter tomorrow morning with the constitution bench matters.”

    The bench, also comprising Justice P.S. Narasimha, said they don’t want to disrupt the constitution bench as there are three judges waiting and added, “we will finish the constitution bench and get up a little early and then take it up tomorrow”. Sibal requested the bench to take up the matter Tuesday only.

    The Chief Justice said, “We have not read it yet…tomorrow.” The bench decided to take up the matter at 3.30 p.m. on Wednesday.

    Thackeray, in the plea filed through advocate Amit Anand Tiwari, said the ECI has failed to appreciate that the petitioner enjoys overwhelming support in the rank and file of the party. “The petitioner has an overwhelming majority in the Pratinidhi Sabha, which is the apex representative body, representing the wishes of the primary members and other stakeholders of the party. The Pratinidhi Sabha is the apex body recognised under Article VIII of the Party Constitution. The petitioner enjoys the support of 160 members out of approximately 200 odd members in the Pratinidhi Sabha”, it added.

    The plea contended that the ECI has failed to discharge its duties as a neutral arbiter of disputes under para 15 of the symbols order and has acted in a manner undermining its constitutional status.

    On February 17, the Election Commission allotted the Shiv Sena party name and the bow and arrow symbol to the faction led by Eknath Shinde.

    “The ECI has disregarded the party Constitution of 2018 (which was admitted even by the respondent No.1 to be the Constitution governing the parties) on the ground that such a constitution is undemocratic and that it was not communicated to the Commission. These observations are totally erroneous as the amendments in the Constitution were categorically communicated to the Commission in 2018 itself and the petitioner will place clear evidence in this regard,” said the plea, seeking interim stay on the ECI order passed on February 17.

    [ad_2]
    #agrees #examine #Uddhav #Thackeray #plea #decision #Wednesday

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • EC decision to allot ‘bow and arrow’ symbol to us victory of truth: Eknath Shinde

    EC decision to allot ‘bow and arrow’ symbol to us victory of truth: Eknath Shinde

    [ad_1]

    Agra: Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde on Sunday said the Election Commission’s decision to allot his faction of the Shiv Sena the “bow and arrow” election symbol was a victory of truth.

    Addressing a Shivaji Jayanti function in Agra in Uttar Pradesh Sunday evening, he said his faction got the “bow and arrow” symbol because of the blessings of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.

    The majority has a weightage in democracy and the truth has prevailed, he said on the Election Commission decision.

    Shinde was in Agra to attend the 393rd birth anniversary celebrations of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the 17th-century Maratha ruler, at the Diwan-e-Aam of the Agra Fort.

    Union ministers Raosaheb Patil Danve and S P Singh Baghel attended the celebrations.

    It was organised by Ajinkya Deogiri Pratisthan, a social and cultural organisation, in collaboration with the Cultural Department of Maharashtra.

    He thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath for allowing the celebrations at the Agra Fort.

    Talking to reporters, Shinde said, “It was a historic day for the followers of Shivaji Maharaj to celebrate his jayanti at the Agra Fort.”

    The Maratha ruler was held captive briefly by Mughal emperor Aurangzeb at the Diwan-e-Aam of the Agra Fort.

    The Election Commission on Friday recognised the Shinde-led faction as the real Shiv Sena and ordered allocation of the “bow and arrow” poll symbol to it, delivering a big blow to the rival camp led by former chief minister Uddhav Thackeray, whose father Bal Thackeray founded the outfit in 1966.

    In a unanimous order on the six-month-old petition filed by Shinde, the three-member Commission said it had relied on the numerical strength of the party in the legislative wing, where the chief minister enjoyed the support of 40 of the 55 MLAs and 13 of the 18 Lok Sabha members.

    It gave a detailed reasoning on why it was forced to ignore the claims of the rival factions led by Shinde and Thackeray respectively over the organisational wing of the party, contending that the amendments to the Shiv Sena constitution in 2018, after the death of founder Balasaheb Thackeray, were undemocratic and paved the way to appoint people from a coterie as office bearers without any election at all.

    Shinde broke ranks with Uddhav Thackeray in June last year and formed the government in Maharashtra in alliance with the BJP.

    [ad_2]
    #decision #allot #bow #arrow #symbol #victory #truth #Eknath #Shinde

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Larry Hogan says decision about 2024 run will come this spring

    Larry Hogan says decision about 2024 run will come this spring

    [ad_1]

    gettyimages 1219428132 1

    “I’m traveling around the country just trying to get a feel for what Republican voters want, what Americans are looking for, and we’re going to make a decision in a relatively short period of time,” Hogan said Sunday.

    If he decides to run, Hogan would join Trump and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley in the Republican field. Several other Republicans have also teased the possibility of 2024 presidential campaigns.

    Limited to two terms as governor, Hogan left office last month. His approval rating stood at 77 percent in one Gonzalez poll, though it was higher among Democrats than Republicans in one of the nation’s bluest states.

    [ad_2]
    #Larry #Hogan #decision #run #spring
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • High Court Gave A Big Decision Regarding Pension! Government

    [ad_1]


    Never Miss An Update After Joining This Group
    Join Our What’s GroupClick Here


     

     

    Pension Scheme: You will not be able to take advantage of the monthly pension scheme of Rs 18,500 after March 31! know why

    Government employees got relief from the court regarding pension. The High Court has ruled in favor of the employees. Pension, which is a great support of old age, pension is of great importance to live the rest of the life with respect. In such a situation, the employees have got good news from the decision of the court.

    New Delhi: Government employees got relief from the court regarding pension. The High Court has ruled in favor of the employees. Pension, which is a great support of old age, pension is of great importance to live the rest of the life with respect. In such a situation, the employees have got good news from the decision of the court.

    Non-regular service period will also be added to total tenure

    According to the report of news agency PTI, the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court said on Friday that non-regular service period of government employees will also be added to their total tenure while providing pension. However, the bench has declared the petitioners entitled to the benefits of pension for the last three years only.

    This order was passed by a single bench of Justice Vivek Chaudhary while explaining the decision given by the Supreme Court in Prem Singh’s case in 2019 under section two of the Uttar Pradesh Pension for Qualifying Service and Validation Act 2021.

    The employee has given his services, whether permanent or temporary

    Justice Chowdhary said that eligibility for pension in Section 2 of the Uttar Pradesh Pension for Qualifying Service and Validation Act 2021 implies that the employee has given his services, even if the services are permanent are or temporary.

    The court gave its verdict by approving 51 writ petitions together

    The court has given this verdict by approving about 51 writ petitions filed separately on behalf of work in-charge employees, daily wage workers, ad hoc employees or seasonal collection amines. In the petitions, those orders of the government were challenged, in which it refused to consider the irregular services of the petitioners as eligible for pension by not adding them to their total service while taking the decision regarding grant of pension.

    The court cited this decision of the Supreme Court.

    In its decision, the bench, citing the decision given in the case of Prem Singh of the Supreme Court, said that even after working for the same number of years as the regular employees, the government employees of non-regular service Not adding it to the total length of service is discriminatory.

    18 months pending DA Arrear

    [ad_2]
    #High #Court #Gave #Big #Decision #Pension #Government

    ( With inputs from : kashmirpublication.in )

  • Election Commission’s decision dangerous for democracy: Uddhav Thackeray

    Election Commission’s decision dangerous for democracy: Uddhav Thackeray

    [ad_1]

    Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Uddhav Thackeray on Friday described as dangerous for democracy Election Commission’s decision to recognise Eknath Shinde faction as real Shiv Sena.

    “They (Eknath Shinde faction) have stolen our bow and arrow symbol, but people will avenge this theft,” Thackeray told reporters at his Matoshree bungalow in suburban Bandra.

    Claiming that there was no democracy left in India, Thackeray said PM Modi should declare that dictatorship has started in the country.

    “We will challenge in Supreme Court poll panel’s decision to recognise Eknath Shinde faction as real Shiv Sena,” he said. The EC decision is very dangerous for democracy, he added.

    The EC decision indicates that the Mumbai municipal corporation elections will be declared soon, he said.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Election #Commissions #decision #dangerous #democracy #Uddhav #Thackeray

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Shiv Sena (UBT) to challenge EC decision on name-symbol in court

    Shiv Sena (UBT) to challenge EC decision on name-symbol in court

    [ad_1]

    Mumbai: The Shiv Sena (UBT) on Friday said it would move the Delhi High Court to challenge the decision of the Election Commission (EC) on awarding the party’s original name ‘Shiv Sena’ and its symbol ‘Bow and Arrow’ to the Balasahebanchi Shiv Sena headed by Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde.

    Shiv Sena (UBT) chief spokesperson and MP Sanjay Raut slammed the EC move, saying it made a mockery of truth and justice.

    “… 40 people laid claim over Balasaheb Thackeray’s Shiv Sena and the EC approved it. The script was already written and ready,” said Raut.

    The Sena (UBT) leader said “the country is heading towards dictatorship” and “the traitor kept saying that the (EC) verdict will be in his favour. A miracle has happened! Keep fighting”.

    On the other hand, the BSS leaders including Shinde, Shambhuraj Desai and others welcomed the EC move, and said that they would now start working immediately under the new name and symbol.

    “It’s a victory for the ideals of Hindu Hriday Samrat Balasaheb Thackeray and Anand Dighe, all the elected representatives (MLAs and MPs) who are with me and lakhs of workers. It’s the triumph of democracy and the EC decision has come on merits in our favour. Our government was formed based on the Constitution, majority support and the peoples’ mandate,” said Shinde.

    The EC verdict was also hailed as ‘historic’ by the ruling ally state Bharatiya Janata Party President Chandrashekhar Bawankule, and called it ‘Satyameva Jayate’ (triumph of truth).

    Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said that Shinde’s party, which was following the ideals of the late Balasaheb Thackeray, has been given the name ‘Shiv Sena’ and ‘Bow and Arrow’ symbol.

    Fadnavis said that they were hopeful of the verdict as the Election Commission has relied on its past decisions in similar cases, and hence, ruled in favour of Shinde in a free and fearless manner despite pressure from the other side.

    Sena (UBT)’s spokesperson Sushma Andhare said that the party will give a legal challenge to the EC ruling and “the next battle will be fought in the courts”.

    She accused the government of deploying central probe agencies and misusing public offices, which led to the collapse of the erstwhile Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government in June 2022.

    Leader of Opposition in Council Ambadas Danve said that Sena (UBT) President Uddhav Thackeray will address the media later on Friday night, and present views on the EC verdict.

    Fadnavis added that now the real Shiv Sena, founded by Balasaheb Thackeray, has now come to Shinde who has been following his ideals and principles, and the Sena (UBT) was free to challenge the EC ruling in the high court.

    Meanwhile, the ECI decision was greeted with cheers, slogans of “Shiv Sena Zindabad, Eknath Shinde Zindabad”, bursting of fire-crackers, distributing sweets, displaying the ‘Shiv Sena’ name and ‘Bow and Arrow’ symbols, in the CM’s home town Thane, Nashik, Aurangabad and other places in Maharashtra.

    [ad_2]
    #Shiv #Sena #UBT #challenge #decision #namesymbol #court

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )