Tag: decides

  • Karnataka: After row over Muslim-owned stalls last year, temple decides on no stalls

    Karnataka: After row over Muslim-owned stalls last year, temple decides on no stalls

    [ad_1]

    Mangaluru: A temple in coastal Karnataka has barred vendors from setting up shops in the shrine area during the ongoing annual temple fair that got underway on April 5.

    The decision comes a year after a controversy had broken out when a banner was displayed outside Bappanadu Sri Durgaparameshwari Temple at Mulki in Mangaluru taluk asking the temple authorities not to allow Muslim vendors to set up stalls for the temple fair.

    Speaking about the management committee’s decision to prohibit the stalls from being put up for this year’s festivities, temple hereditary trustee N S Manohar Shetty on Sunday said the temple stands as a symbol of communal harmony and thousands of people from different faiths, including Muslims, revere the deity.

    MS Education Academy

    “We were pained by last year’s development. The committee decided not to have any stalls in the temple area for the ongoing temple fair. We want the fair to go in a harmonious manner and did not want any controversy,” he said.

    Shetty said vendors are free to erect stalls in the private property adjacent to the temple land if the owner agrees. A committee of volunteers is looking after the shops on the private land and a part of the money collected by the committee for allotment of shops is given to the temple, Shetty further said.

    He denied the charge made by some Muslim vendors that they were not allowed to erect stalls for the fair, while adding that the management committee members have made it clear that no vendor belonging to any faith will be permitted to open shops on the temple land.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Karnataka #row #Muslimowned #stalls #year #temple #decides #stalls

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Politics over Iftar: RLJD decides to stay away from parties this year

    Politics over Iftar: RLJD decides to stay away from parties this year

    [ad_1]

    Patna: While the politics of Iftar continues in Bihar, Upendra Kushwaha-led Rashtriya Lok Janata Dal (RLJD) has decided not organise such an event this year.

    Kushwaha, while interacting with media persons in Patna said: “Going for an Iftar party is similar to sprinkling salt on the wounds that happened due to the communal violence during the Ram Navami processions in Sasaram and Bihar Sharif.”

    “The holy month of Ramzan is currently underway and people are organising Iftar parties. Some prominent people invited me for the Iftar parties. A number of members of my party also suggested that I organise an Iftar party. In view of the current situation in Sasaram and Bihar Sharif, I personally believe that instead of organising an event, we have to make it convenient for ‘Rozedars (Muslim people who do the fast during the month of Ramzan)’. At present, ointments are needed to fill wounds. Organising events could be viewed as sprinkling salt on the wounds,” Kushwaha said.

    MS Education Academy

    Earlier, the BJP distanced itself from Nitish Kumar’s Iftar party after Ram Navami violence. Chief Minister Nitish Kumar had invited every political party, including BJP, LJPR, RLJD and others, but the leaders of these three political parties stayed away.

    On Sunday, the RJD is organising an Iftar party at Rabri Devi’s residence. RJD also invited BJP leaders, Upendra Kushwaha and Chirag Paswan. BJP and Upendra Kushwaha decided not to go in the iftar party of RJD. As Chirag Paswan has close family relations with Lalu’s family, he will go for the Iftar party at Rabri Devi residence.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Politics #Iftar #RLJD #decides #stay #parties #year

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Congress is kinda lame, TikTok-verse decides

    Congress is kinda lame, TikTok-verse decides

    [ad_1]

    2023 0323 tik tok 11 francis 1

    For a lot of those watching — and live-tweeting, or replying on TikTok itself – the spectacle looked like a CEO being hectored by out-of-touch legislators over issues that plenty of companies face.

    It’s a common theme that Congress can look out of touch on technology in social media hearings — it’s a critique that comes up whenever tech executives get hauled in front of committees. The questioners themselves make easy targets for tech-savvy watchers.

    There are reasonable arguments, of course, that lawmakers don’t need to be tech experts to make effective laws. But a key twist, this time, was China.

    Behind all the questions about kids’ safety and misinformation, a central thread of the hearing was that TikTok is owned by a Chinese parent company, and its data might — might — end up in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party. Or might be there right now.

    Politically, this feels like a winning issue in Washington. But it also struck a lot of TikTok users and tech insiders as pretty alienating — even xenophobic:

    Even the founder of Parler chimed in:

    Does it matter what TikTok users think of Congress? It might, if Congress cracks down and the app’s loyal users get mad.

    It probably won’t in the near term: the House has little authority and less willpower to do something right now, and on the one Senate bill that might make a difference to social-media regulation, House members haven’t even even picked up the pen to write their own draft.

    And in the bigger war of political theater versus real public opinion, aggressive questioning of the TikTok CEO won them very few fans anywhere else. Across the political spectrum, those watching — from a Bernie supporter to a MAGA supporter — pointed out how little Shou Zi Chew was actually allowed to say without being cut off (even when the question was relevant to TikTok). A prominent influencer made a TikTok about it. Rep. Maxwell Frost and a Gen Z activist both called out the performative nature of the hearing.

    Call it, at best, a generational draw. Chew’s performance did not sway the House Energy and Science Committee — but they didn’t come across well to their digital audience either.



    [ad_2]
    #Congress #kinda #lame #TikTokverse #decides
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Congress decides not to hold elections to CWC

    Congress decides not to hold elections to CWC

    [ad_1]

    Raipur: The steering committee of the Congress on Friday decided not to hold elections to the CWC, and the party president was authorised to constitute it.

    The Congress has said that about 45 leaders spoke on the Congress Working Committee (CWC) election issue, and the consensus was taken.

    Party’s General Secretary in-charge Communications, Jairam Ramesh said, “Unanimous decision was taken to authorise Congress president to constitute the new CWC.”

    The Congress is holding its 85th plenary session in Raipur.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Congress #decides #hold #elections #CWC

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Centre decides to take over 123 Delhi Waqf Board properties; Won’t allow it, says chairman Khan

    Centre decides to take over 123 Delhi Waqf Board properties; Won’t allow it, says chairman Khan

    [ad_1]

    Delhi: The Union Housing and Urban Affairs Ministry has decided to take over 123 properties of the Delhi Waqf Board, including mosques, dargahs and graveyards, evoking a sharp reaction from board chairman and AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan.

    Khan asserted that he will not allow the central government to take over the Waqf properties.

    The deputy land and development officer, in a letter to the board on February 8, informed it of the decision to “absolve” it from all matters pertaining to the 123 Waqf properties.

    The Land and Development Office (L&DO) of the central ministry said the two-member committee headed by Justice (retired) S P Garg on the issue of denotified Waqf properties in its report submitted that no representation or objection was received by it from the Delhi Waqf Board.

    The committee was formed by the government of India on the order of the Delhi High Court, according to the L&DO letter.

    The L&DO said the Delhi Waqf Board was the main stakeholder/affected party to whom the opportunity was given by the committee. However, it did not appear before the committee or filed any representation or objection regarding 123 properties.

    “It is evident from the above facts that Delhi Waqf Board does not have any stake in the listed properties, neither have they shown any interest in the properties nor filed any objections or claims. It is, therefore, decided to absolve Delhi Waqf Board from all matters pertaining to ‘123 Waqf Properties’,” said the L&DO letter.

    Physical inspection of all 123 properties will now be carried out by the L&DO.

    According to Khan, the L&DO has pasted notices at 123 properties, which has caused “widespread anxiety, fear and resentment” among the Muslim community.

    “We have already raised our voice in the court on 123 Waqf properties, our Writ Petition No.1961/2022 is pending in the High Court.

    “Some people are spreading lies about it, the proof of this is in front of all of you. We will not allow anyone to occupy the properties of the Waqf Board,” he said in a tweet in Hindi.

    The DWB chairman in a reply to the Deputy Land and Development Officer of the central ministry on Friday said that the Delhi Waqf Board had already filed a petition in the high court in January 2022 against the formation of a two-member committee on the basis of whose report the action has been initiated by the ministry.

    Khan said that the committee was informed on April 12 last year about Waqf Board’s petition in the high court, challenging its formation and asking it to defer its proceedings until a final order was passed by the court. The matter is pending in the high court.

    He also said that before the two-member committee, a one-member panel was formed whose report was rejected without giving any reason. Also, the government of India had allotted one of the 123 properties to the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) on permanent basis, after which the Waqf Board had approached the high court.

    “Two-member committee has already submitted its report. However, no such report is shared with the Delhi Waqf Board. Hence, you are requested to share a complete set of the report with the Delhi Waqf Board urgently,” Khan said.

    He claimed that there was no direction to constitute a two-member committee by the high court in its order dated August 20, 2014.

    These 123 properties are used by the Muslim community. The day-to-day management of these 123 properties was done by Mutawallis or the management committees appointed by the Delhi Waqf Board, he said.

    The Delhi Waqf Board has a statutory right under Section 32 of the Waqf Act, 1995, to exercise the powers of general supervision, administration and control over these properties, he asserted.

    According to the Waqf Act, all the Waqf properties vest in the concerned Waqf Board, which in the present case, is Delhi Waqf Board, Khan said.

    The Waqf nature of the 123 properties was “innate” as all were religious structures like mosques, dargahs and graveyards. Some of them were given to the Delhi Waqf Board’s predecessor – ‘Sunni Majlis Auqaf – by the British ruler, he added.

    [ad_2]
    #Centre #decides #Delhi #Waqf #Board #properties #Wont #chairman #Khan

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )