Tag: decide

  • Wrestlers form two committees to decide on future course of action

    Wrestlers form two committees to decide on future course of action

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The protesting wrestlers on Friday formed two committees to advice them on the future course of action in their fight against outgoing Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brijbhushan Sharan Singh.

    The aggrieved wrestlers started the day contemplating their next move after the Supreme Court closed proceedings on their plea even as Sports Minister Anurag Thakur requested them to have faith in the system, saying the investigation will make everything crystal clear.

    “Vinesh is discussing it with the legal team. We will inform tomorrow. Today we made two committee — one is a 31-member committee and the second is a nine-member one.
    Khap panchayat, farmers and women organisations are there in 31 member committee. The nine-member committee will decide on the wrestling part,” said Bajrang Punia.

    MS Education Academy

    “I request the sports minister to come and stand on the side of truth.”

    “We will restart our fight, maybe by going to the high court. This fight is not restricted to three wrestlers,” he added.

    With the Delhi Police blocking the entry of more wrestlers to the protest site, only a few farmers could reach Jantar Mantar on Friday to extend their support.

    The usual fervour was missing as the protest entered the 13th day though political and farmer leaders continued to visit the wrestlers. Congress leaders Kumari Selja, Kiran Choudhary and Anil Kumar extended their support to the grapplers.

    “It feels like we are in prison. There are barricades on all sides. The police is also misleading our supporters. So many are sitting on the Delhi borders.”

    “Our legal team and the mentors are still discussing the next move. We will let you know once we finalise something,” Olympic medallist Bajrang Punia had earlier told PTI.

    The wrestlers have the option of moving to a lower court or the Delhi High Court if they are not satisfied with the police investigation into the sexual harassment charges against the outgoing Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brijbhushan.

    The Supreme Court on Thursday closed the proceedings on the women wresters’ petition, saying the prayer for an FIR has been answered. The wrestlers said the apex court order was not a setback for them.

    The Delhi Police has registered two FIRs, including one on POCSO Act, against Singh.

    The police have also recorded statements of five wrestlers, including the minor.

    “It is my request to all the sportspersons who are agitating there that whatever their demands were, they were met. Court has also given its directions and they should let an unbiased probe to complete,” Thakur said in Lucknow on the sidelines of a Khelo India event.

    “Delhi police will do ‘doodh ka doodh pani ka pani’ and take strict action as per law,” he added.

    The wrestlers, who alleged that police personnel misbehaved with them on Wednesday night, have threatened to return the awards the government has bestowed on them in the past.

    Renowned wrestling coach Mahvir Phogat, the uncle of Vinesh Phogat, who is the face of the protest, also made a similar threat.

    He is a Dronacharya awardee, having received the honour in 2016.

    “I will return my medals if justice is not delivered in the case,” Phogat said.

    “The kind of allegations he (WFI chief) faces, action should be taken against him and he should be arrested,” Phogat, who had joined BJP over three years ago, added.

    When asked if he had spoken to any senior government official or raised the matter at party level, he said, “No there has been no talk so far.”

    On Thursday, many Khaps held protests including in Hisar, Bhiwani, Jind and Rohtak, expressing solidarity with the wrestlers and demanding that they should be given justice.

    Meanwhile, former Indian cricket team captain Sourav Ganguly said he would not like to comment on the issue, as he “doesn’t have complete knowledge” about it.

    “Let them fight their battle. That’s what it is. I really do not know what’s happening there. I obviously read in the newspapers and I realise one thing in the sports world that you don’t talk about things that you don’t have complete knowledge about,” Ganguly said.

    “So, I hope it gets resolved. The wrestlers have won a lot of medals and brought accolades to the country. Hopefully, it will be resolved,” the former BCCI president added.

    [ad_2]
    #Wrestlers #form #committees #decide #future #action

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • ‘Muslims have to decide..’: Telangana Cong chief on quota row

    ‘Muslims have to decide..’: Telangana Cong chief on quota row

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: Telangana Congress president A Revanth Reddy on Wednesday slammed both the BJP-led centre and the BRS-led state government.

    His remarks in Adilabad come after union home minister Amit Shah’s recent remarks in Chevella vowing to scrap the Muslim reservation in Telangana just like how the BJP-led state government did in the state of Karnataka.

    “BRS cheated in the name of increasing Muslim reservation to 12 per cent from 4, BJP says they will remove even the existing one. It is the Congress who delivered on the Muslim reservation. Muslim brothers have to decide which side they want to go to,” he said.

    MS Education Academy

    Backward Muslims in Telangana enjoy 4 per cent reservation in education and jobs. This was introduced by the Congress government in undivided Andhra Pradesh about 15 years ago.

    The state’s incumbent Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS)-led government has promised to increase the Muslim quota to 12 per cent. A resolution to this effect was passed in Telangana Assembly and sent to the Centre five years ago but the proposal has been rejected by the BJP-led government.

    Revanth expressed confidence that Congress will form the government in 2024. He promised to fill over 2 lakh government job vacancies immediately once in power.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Muslims #decide. #Telangana #Cong #chief #quota #row

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • ‘I can’t just decide to not fancy Cate Blanchett’: what does it mean to be sexually fluid?

    ‘I can’t just decide to not fancy Cate Blanchett’: what does it mean to be sexually fluid?

    [ad_1]

    When asked, I define my sexuality as “around 84-87% gay”. I suppose this would equate to the upper end of the Kinsey scale, which rates nought as exclusively heterosexual and six as its opposite. But there is plenty of disagreement as to whether sexuality is innate or acquired, immutable or fluctuating, and even what certain terms mean.

    “Fluid”, originally attributed to the psychologist Lisa M Diamond, has become a buzzword for those who do not “fit” into traditional categories. Fluidity is different from, for example, bisexuality, because a person who is bisexual might be bisexual for life, whereas fluidity suggests oscillation. But fluid is, I suppose, what I am.

    Every generation thinks it invented sex (nod to Philip Larkin here, his tongue firmly in cheek), and although stances on sexual mores have become increasingly liberal in many parts of the world, and scientific advances have resulted in considerable change in sexual practices and values (perhaps most prominently the synthesis of the contraceptive pill), the truth is that humans have been experimenting for ever. Scenes of humping drawn on the walls of Egyptian caves. Vatsyayana’s Kama Sutra. Anne Lister fingering half of the married women in Halifax.

    It was (the gay) Austro-Hungarian writer and activist Karl Maria Benkert who coined the term “homosexual” in 1868, but psychiatrist Richard Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing’s Psychopathatia Sexualis which proved resilient in judicial and medical application. Same-sex attraction, in Krafft-Ebing’s opinion, was aberrant. Freud, influenced by Krafft-Ebing, believed everyone to be bisexual, although his thinking on matters of sexuality changed throughout his career. The word “lesbian” derives from the island on which Sappho lived, Lesbos. Its first usage was in a medical dictionary in 1890.

    Male + female
    Illustration: Guardian Design

    If one were to ask when I ground zero “came out”, I couldn’t say. I never truly did. From noticing as a child that the scratchy carpet of my grandmother’s house felt nice against my skin, or trying to “consummate” the “relationship” unsuccessfully with my primary school boyfriend through his gym shorts, I appreciated that sexuality was a pleasurable part of life, and one wouldn’t deny oneself pancakes or azure seas.

    My teens consisted of the standard fumbling in parks and third base at house parties before I moved to Russia at 18 and slept with what seemed like half of the male population.

    When I was 20, I moved back to the UK and started spending all of my time with a person, and that person happened to be a woman, and I seemed to be staying overnight a lot, and … well, most people are at least semi-observant. All I can say is the attraction seemed inevitable, despite neither of us having slept with a woman before – she was the first person I had ever been in love with, and we bounced back and forth for two-and-a-half years. That first situation was complicated by the presence of a (wonderful!) child, and so I was initially cast in the role of “good friend”. Unfortunately the euphemistic status of good friend still exists – and not just in the scenarios you might expect. It is a truism that LGBTQ+ people have to “come out” all of the time.

    Many people who identify as LGBTQ+ find the Foucauldian view of sexuality as a construct offensive, believing that it equates to saying an individual’s sexuality is a choice, and ammunition for conversion practices. That some people believe their sexuality absolute and others feel it fluctuates – and here we should distinguish between sexual orientation and sexual identity – is inconsequential in my opinion; bigots will jump on either explanation to ascribe perversion. The important thing is that an individual’s consensual sexual desire as integral to their sense of self should not be oppressed; it’s never a conscious preference. I can’t just decide to not fancy Cate Blanchett.

    Sometimes friends ask how sex is different with men and women (I have never slept with someone who, at that time, identified as trans or non-binary). I much prefer sex with women, because sex with women is spectacular, but, in my case, it might also be to do with a rather unhealthy dynamic when it came to sex with men, which we won’t go into here but kept many a therapist in work in my 20s.

    It’s not that I don’t fancy men. Michelangelo’s David is proof enough that they are beautiful. That V-shaped muscle pointing towards the groin, sometimes known as Adonis’s belt. The forest trail of hair on the torso. But women are sublime, whether or not they conform to dominant (often western) ideas of attractiveness, which nevertheless change throughout history. Toned tummies or rolls of fat that can form a kiss around belly buttons. Stretch marks like flashes of white lightning. Collarbones and calves. There is only one thing better in life than admiring the body of a woman as she pads from the bed to the bathroom, and that is watching her return.

    There is the idea that sex with someone of the same sex is easier, or better, because the equipment is the same. There is a large degree of truth in this, but different people like different things. One of the greatest things about having sex with women is the multiple orgasms that you can both have. And the fact orgasms can be clitoral or vaginal – or both, together. Having sex with a woman is like being in a same-ability dance class.

    Female + female
    Illustration: Guardian Design

    Who we choose to be intimate with isn’t just about sex. I know that while I have never been romantically in love with a man, the emotional symbiosis between women is intense. LGBTQ+ people, in particular gay men, have long been sexualised or, in the case of lesbians, eroticised by straight men. “Love Is Love” emerging as the motto of LGBTQ+ rights has done a lot to shift focus from the bedroom.

    Mine is a millennial generation that continues to benefit immensely from the gay liberation movements which resulted in social, legal and cultural progress. Mid- to late-20th-century activists and allies especially put their lives on the line for a better future; whether the Stonewall riots or the Daughters of Bilitis, or the solidarity between gay and lesbian people with striking miners. A 2021 study of 175 countries found that attitudes overall had become more positive since 1981, with 56 countries reporting an increase in social acceptance. But this leaves plenty of people whose lives are heartbreakingly ruined – or ended – merely for their existence. Mostly this is a legacy of imported religious, colonial laws, which many in the west would do well to remember.

    It’s not that things have completely improved, either. When I was at school in the early 00s “gay” was synonymous for crap. Representation was slim. I watched Mulholland Drive for its gay scenes many times. These days I will read a novel, or watch a film, and an LGBTQ+ character will appear, protagonist or peripheral. Portrayals are no longer exclusively based on the torturous or the self-flagellating. I can legally marry another woman. But a taxi driver made me get out and walk when he realised I was giving directions to a gay club. Men will slur about “joining in” when seeing me kiss a girlfriend, so there’s that.

    Each of us must confront the paradigm shifts of new generations. It is Gen Z’s turn to invent sex (sexual intercourse began in 2023, some time after the launch of OnlyFans but before Sam Smith’s Unholy). Gen Z has been called “the queerest generation of all time”. In 2021, just 65% of university-aged women described themselves as exclusively heterosexual. I’ll admit to sometimes being confused by the extension of the LGBTQ+ initialism to the point where it resembles a Scrabble hand. But when have language and terminology ever been static?

    What does it mean to be sexually “fluid” in 2023? For me it’s scrolling Instagram memes about U-Hauling (the joke that lesbians move in together after dating for a week) but also perving over the man at the local bookshop who has the eyelashes of a camel. It’s being pissed off there’s only one lesbian bar left in London despite the fact the “night-time tsar” is literally a lesbian. It’s reading news stories about bakeries offended by the idea of two marzipan men in suits. It’s having to check the laws in countries when picking a holiday destination. It’s wanting a cigarette after sex despite having quit long ago. It’s, above all, coming as you are.

    [ad_2]
    #decide #fancy #Cate #Blanchett #sexually #fluid
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • ‘Decide bills as soon as possible’: SC on KCR-Governor row

    ‘Decide bills as soon as possible’: SC on KCR-Governor row

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday observed that the Constitution’s Article 200(1) and the words “as soon as possible” have a significant constitutional intent and must be borne in mind by constitutional functionaries, while hearing a plea filed by the Telangana government seeking direction to Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan to clear ten bills passed by the Assembly and awaiting her assent.

    A bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising Justice P.S. Narasimha said: “Article 200 of the Constitution… the first proviso of Article 200 states that Governor may, as soon as possible, after the presentation of the bill for assent, return the bill, if it is not Money Bill together with the message for reconsideration to the state legislature.”

    The bench said the expression “as soon as possible” has a significant constitutional intent and must be borne in mind by constitutional authorities.

    MS Education Academy

    As Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Telangana Governor, submitted that this observation in the order was not necessary, the Chief Justice said: “Mr Solicitor, we have not made this observation about this particular Governor. We said it must be borne in mind by constitutional authorities.”.

    Mehta said: “This was not needed… I can say nothing more… I do not want to vitiate the atmosphere further.”

    Article 200 of the Constitution empowers the Governor to either assent to a Bill passed by the state legislature or to withhold assent therefrom or to reserve the Bill for consideration of the President.

    The top court disposed of the petition after Mehta submitted that he took instructions following a direction and as of now, no bills are pending.

    During the hearing, senior advocate Dushyant Dave, representing the Telangana government, urged the court to pass directions “once and for all” to put the issue at rest and said “your lordships may decide this once and for all. In Madhya Pradesh bills are being assented to within one week, in Gujarat within one month. Telangana is an opposition state….so this is happening.”

    Mehta opposed these submissions and contended that he would not generalise the matter like that.

    Dave then said, “You will not because you’re a law officer appointed by the Central government” and Mehta responded that shouting will not help before this court.

    Dave said, “Did I shout? This is the law officer of India. Every time I appear, he has an allergy to me. I have an allergy to you… He has stooped so low, I haven’t seen this in 44 years!”

    In March, the Telangana government approached the Supreme Court seeking direction from Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan to give her approval to the bills passed by the state legislature. In a writ petition, the state government has brought to the notice of the Supreme Court that 10 bills are pending with Raj Bhavan. While seven bills are pending since September 2022, three bills were sent to the Governor last month for her approval.

    The plea contended that Article 200 empowers the Governor to either assent to a Bill passed by the state legislature or to withhold assent therefrom or to reserve the Bill for consideration of the president and this power is however to be exercised “as soon as possible”.

    [ad_2]
    #Decide #bills #KCRGovernor #row

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Pence: If I decide to run, you’ll know soon

    Pence: If I decide to run, you’ll know soon

    [ad_1]

    1445868048

    Former Vice President Mike Pence said that he would expect to announce his 2024 presidential decision “well before” late June.

    “I think if we have an announcement to make, it’ll be well before late June,” the Indiana Republican told Robert Costa in an interview that will air Sunday morning on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

    Pence stopped short of confirming that he’s “leaning in” toward a presidential campaign, but told Costa, “Well, I’m here in Iowa, Robert.”

    It’s not Pence’s first time in Iowa, home to the season-opening 2024 GOP caucuses, in recent months. He traveled there at the beginning of March for a foreign policy forum.

    He’s also made recent appearances in New Hampshire, the first primary state, and he’s taken other steps that indicate he’s preparing for a run, like building out his political staff.

    Pence’s implying that he might be planning to make a bid for president is not new: He said late November that he was giving “prayerful consideration” to a run.

    Pence told Costa there was a clear rationale behind his timing.

    “Anyone that would be serious about seeking the Republican nomination would need to be in this contest by June,” Pence said during the CBS interview.

    [ad_2]
    #Pence #decide #run #youll
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Army truck attacked in Poonch was carrying fruits for Iftar; villagers decide on no Eid

    Army truck attacked in Poonch was carrying fruits for Iftar; villagers decide on no Eid

    [ad_1]

    There will be no Eid-al-Fitr in Sangiote village. A pale of gloom engulfed the village after news of the Poonch terror attack reached its villagers.

    “We have not celebrated Eid with any pomp and show. We just offered prayers. The people are grieved over the martyrdom of jawans, who were bringing material for our Iftar on Thursday evening,” Sangiote Sarpanch Mukhtiar Khan told PTI over the phone from his home.

    Expressing solidarity with the Indian Army and the families of the jawans, he said an Iftar was scheduled in the village on Thursday evening and the jawans were ferrying vegetables, fruits and other materials in the truck from Bhimber Gali camp when they came under attack at Bhata Dhurian.

    MS Education Academy

    The soldiers were from a Rashtriya Rifles unit deployed for counter-terror operations.

    The whole village stands with the Army, Khan said.

    “After Eid prayers, we are staying back at our homes and there will be no celebrations like visiting relatives, distributing sweets, wearing new clothes or taking children outside as is the practice on the first day of the festival,” he said.

    Amir Khan, another villager, said after the terrorist attack they had convened a condolence meeting. “The participants were unanimous in condemning the terrorist attack and decided to restrict Eid celebrations to namaz’ only,” he said.

    Saddam Hussain said a company of the Rashtriya Rifles is deployed in the village and enjoys cordial ties with the villagers. “The soldiers usually distribute fresh fruits, including watermelons, to the residents for Iftar’ and nobody had imagined such an attack on them just two days ahead of Eid,” he said.

    The Bhata Dhurian forest area has for long remained a preferred infiltration route for terrorists from across the Line of Control because of its topography, dense forest cover and natural caves.

    In October 2021, nine soldiers were killed in two major gunfights with terrorists within four days in the forest area during a search operation, which continued for over three weeks with no trace of terrorists.

    [ad_2]
    #Army #truck #attacked #Poonch #carrying #fruits #Iftar #villagers #decide #Eid

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Only BJP national leadership can decide on political alliance in TN: Palaniswami

    Only BJP national leadership can decide on political alliance in TN: Palaniswami

    [ad_1]

    Chennai: AIADMK General Secretary K. Palaniswami on Monday said that only the BJP’s national leadership can decide on the alliance in the state for the Lok Sabha elections next year.

    Interacting with media persons at Salem, the AIADMK leader’s comment came following state BJP leader K. Annamalai’s “interpretation” of Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s statement as it had “some nuances”. Even as Union Minister of state for Information and Broadcasting and BJP’s former state chief, L. Murugan has said that the alliance with the AIADMK would continue, Annamalai said that as of now the alliance was intact but elections for 2024 Lok Sabha are far off. He had also said that those who knew Hindi well can “interpret” Shah’s speech.

    Palaniswami’s statement was a clear message to the state BJP leadership that he would be directly dealing with their national leadership and not with them. The central BJP leadership wants a few seats from Tamil Nadu in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and does want the AIADMK as its alliance partner.

    MS Education Academy

    It is also clear that without an alliance with the AIADMK, the BJP will not get any seat in Tamil Nadu and the central leadership of the party cannot afford this.

    Palaniswami, when asked on BJP leader Nainar Nagendran’s statement that he was invited to rejoin AIADMK by him, confirmed it, adding: “Not only Nainar Nagendran but all leaders who had quit the AIADMK party should rejoin it.”

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #BJP #national #leadership #decide #political #alliance #Palaniswami

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Decide In Three Months On Issuing Mehbooba Mufti’s Passport: Delhi HC

    Decide In Three Months On Issuing Mehbooba Mufti’s Passport: Delhi HC

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: The Delhi High Court on Friday directed the Passport Authority in Srinagar to take a fresh decision on the request for the issuance of a passport to former JK chief minister and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) president Mehbooba Mufti within three months.

    The submission was made before a single-judge bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh, wherein the Central government’s standing counsel, Kirtiman Singh, told the court that a decision was taken yesterday on Mufti’s appeal and the matter has been remanded to the passport office in Srinagar.

    Justice Prathiba M Singh noted that the issue has been pending for two years following an appeal against the rejection; it has now been remanded to the passport officer concerned for reconsideration.

    “Considering that the matter has been remanded to the passport officer and the initial rejection was almost two years ago, let the concerned passport officer take a decision expeditiously within three months. The petition is disposed of,” the court ordered.

    Notably, the court order came on a petition by Mufti seeking a direction to the authorities to take an early decision on her appeal regarding the issuance of travel documents.

    In her plea, the former Jammu & Kashmir chief minister stated that there was considerable delay in issuing a new passport to her despite reminders.

    It is pertinent to mention that former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti’s passport expired on May 31, 2019, after which she applied for a fresh/ renewal of her passport on December 11, 2020. However, she was denied the renewal after which she approached the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh.

    In 2021, a single bench of the HC dismissed her petition, and in April same year she moved and appealed before the division bench of the high court which granted her the liberty to approach the appropriate authority to avail the proper remedy available to her.

    “On receipt of the appeal, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the same on its merits, strictly under rules, regulations, and the provisions of the Act, that too un-influenced by the observations made in the judgment impugned dated 29th of March, 2021,” the court said—(KNO)

    [ad_2]
    #Decide #Months #Issuing #Mehbooba #Muftis #Passport #Delhi

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • SC to decide on review pleas against acquittal of 3 Chhawla gangrape-murder convicts

    SC to decide on review pleas against acquittal of 3 Chhawla gangrape-murder convicts

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court is likely to consider on Thursday as many as five petitions seeking review of its verdict acquitting three death row convicts in the gangrape and murder case of a 19-year-old girl in Chhawla area here in 2012.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Bela M Trivedi will decide by circulation in chambers the fate of the five review petitions at 1.50 PM on March 2.

    According to the list of business uploaded on the apex court website, the review pleas are listed for consideration on Thursday.

    The top court, on February 8, had agreed to constitute a three-judge bench to consider pleas for a review of its verdict acquitting the three death row convicts in the sensational case.

    Besides the Delhi government, father of the victim, Uttrakhand Bachao Movement and Uttarakhand Lok Manch have sought the review of the judgement.

    In 2012, the three accused had allegedly gangraped the girl, murdered her and mutilated her body with a screwdriver and other weapons. The trial court had awarded them death sentence and the high court upheld it in August 2014.

    The apex court set aside the high court order and acquitted them of the offences in November last year, sparking a debate on the verdict.

    Except the plea seeking review of a judgement awarding death penalty to a convict, such petitions are considered and decided in chambers.

    [ad_2]
    #decide #review #pleas #acquittal #Chhawla #gangrapemurder #convicts

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • SC to decide legality of police chiefs appointments ‘once and for all’

    SC to decide legality of police chiefs appointments ‘once and for all’

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday said it will deal decide “once and for all” the legal issue of whether the earlier apex court judgement laying down procedures for the appointment of the Director General of Police (DGP) in states will also be applicable to Delhi and other cities.

    The top court, hearing petitions challenging the appointment of senior IPS officer Rakesh Asthana as the Delhi Police Commissioner, said the pleas, so far as they relate to the appointment of Asthana, have become infructuous as the officer has superannuated.

    However, the part Delhi High Court verdict, which had held that the apex court judgement in the Prakash Singh case applies to state DGPs only and not to cities like Delhi and the selection of Commissioner of Police, needs to be dealt with as it has a recurring effect, a bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud said and added the matter will be listed in April.

    While dismissing the plea of NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation’ (CPIL), the high court had said the apex court decision in the Prakash Singh case, which mandated a minimum tenure for certain police officials and the constitution of a UPSC panel before selection, was not applicable to the appointment of the Police Commissioner for Delhi.

    “This observation (of Delhi High Court) is required to be dealt with because this issue has a recurring effect… We will accordingly list this SLP (special leave petition) in April so that the issue is resolved,” said the bench which also comprised Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala.

    Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, appearing for NGO CPIL, said unless the issue, arising out of the Delhi High Court verdict, is dealt with “it will keep coming up again and again”.

    “We will decide this once and for all,” the CJI said.

    The bench, meanwhile, disposed of another petition seeking the appointment of a new DGP in Sikkim after it was apprised that the exercise has been completed as per the procedures prescribed by the apex court.

    Amarendra Kumar Singh, a 1990 batch IPS officer, has been appointed as the new DGP of Sikkim and he took charge on January 4, 2023. He will continue as the DGP till January 4, 2025.

    Earlier on January 16, the apex court had disposed of the petition of the NGO CPIL’ challenging the appointment of now-retired IPS officer Rakesh Asthana as the Delhi Police Commissioner.

    The top court, while closing the pleas, had then said that the legal issues involved would remain open for adjudication.

    Asthana, a 1984-batch Gujarat cadre IPS officer, who was serving as the Director General of the Border Security Force, was appointed the Delhi Police Commissioner on July 27, 2021 just four days before he was scheduled to retire. He was shifted to the Union Territory cadre from the Gujarat cadre for one year.

    Asthana retired on July 31, last year.

    The high court had dismissed the pleas challenging Asthana’s appointment as the Delhi police chief. In its affidavit, the Centre had said the NGO’s petition is an abuse of the process of law and, manifestly, an outcome of some personal vendetta against the then police commissioner.

    The high court, in its verdict, had upheld the Centre’s decision to appoint Asthana as the Delhi Police Commissioner, saying there was “no irregularity, illegality or infirmity” in his selection.

    Dismissing the PIL challenging his selection, it had said the justification and reasons given by the Centre for appointing Asthana are “plausible, calling for no interference in judicial review”.

    The 2006 apex court verdict in the Prakash Singh case said the DGP of a state shall be “selected by the state government from amongst the three senior-most officers of the department who have been empanelled for promotion to that rank by the UPSC on the basis of their length of service, very good record and range of experience for heading the police force”.

    And, once a person has been selected for the job, they should have a minimum tenure of at least two years irrespective of the date of superannuation, it had said.

    The DGP may, however, be relieved of his responsibilities by the state government acting in consultation with the State Security Commission, consequent upon any action taken against him under the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules or following his conviction in a court of law in a criminal offence or a case of corruption, or if he is otherwise incapacitated from discharging his duties, the court had said.

    [ad_2]
    #decide #legality #police #chiefs #appointments

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )