Tag: crime

  • 2015 Dalit youth murder: Madras HC judges inspect crime spot, rail track

    2015 Dalit youth murder: Madras HC judges inspect crime spot, rail track

    [ad_1]

    Chennai: Madras High Court judges Justice M.S. Ramesh and Justice Anand Venkatesh inspected the Tiruchengode Arthanareeswar temple and the rail track in Tamil Nadu’s Namakkal district where the body of Dalit youth Gokul Raj, abducted and murdered in 2015 for going around with an upper class girl, was found.

    Gokul Raj was murdered by a gang headed by S. Yuvaraj, a self-proclaimed youth leader of a dominant caste outfit, for visiting the Tiruchengode temple along with a girl, Swathi, who belonged to an upper caste.

    The Dalit youth was abducted by the members of the caste outfit and later his body was found with his head severed on the rail track near Pallipalayam in Namakkal.

    Gokul Raj was in love with Swathi and had visited Tiruchendur temple along with her. Now, Swathi has turned into a hostile witness in the case and is facing perjury.

    A special court for cases under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in Madurai had sentenced Yuvaraj and ten others to life imprisonment while acquitting five others.

    Gokul Raj’s mother Chithra, however, had moved the Madurai bench of the Madras High Court seeking capital punishment for Yuvaraj and others and against the acquittal of five others.

    Justices Ramesh and Venkatesh decided to conduct an inspection of the crime scene to understand the topography of the area as also the exit and entrance gates as well as the CCTVs’ location in the temple.

    The judges inspected the area on Sunday and inspected all eight CCTV cameras as well as all entrances and exits.

    After the temple premises, the judges inspected the rail track at Pallipalayam where the body of Gokul Raj with his head severed was found.

    Lawyers and family members of both Gokul Raj and Yuvaraj were present but they were not allowed to meet the judges.

    [ad_2]
    #Dalit #youth #murder #Madras #judges #inspect #crime #spot #rail #track

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • ‘A f–king idiot’: Man who breached Pelosi suite says he’s guilty of bluster, not crime

    ‘A f–king idiot’: Man who breached Pelosi suite says he’s guilty of bluster, not crime

    [ad_1]

    capitol riot 96602

    It was a climactic moment as a milestone Jan. 6 prosecution neared its conclusion. Barnett’s image at the desk in Pelosi’s office became a symbol of the brazenness of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and the vulnerability of a key institution attempting to fulfill its responsibility to certify the 2020 election. The case was poised to head to the jury Friday afternoon, with a verdict likely early next week.

    In lengthy, tense cross-examination, Gordon raised sharp doubts about key aspects of Barnett’s Jan. 6 story. Barnett contended that he climbed the center steps of the Capitol to gain a vantage point to find two friends who he lost in the chaos. He then claimed that he was “pushed” into the Capitol after getting stuck in a densely packed crowd near the rotunda doors. He said he roamed around the building merely looking for a bathroom, and found himself in Pelosi’s office suite.

    Then, he claimed he got caught up in the moment and acted foolishly by posing for a photo at the desk of Pelosi aide Emily Berret. He claimed he took an envelope off Berret’s desk — meant for then-Rep. Billy Long (R-Mo.) – and left a quarter as compensation. He didn’t consider it theft, he said, because he paid for the envelope and removed it because he had bled all over it and wanted to remove the “biohazard.”

    Gordon suggested in questioning that Barnett had ample opportunities to turn around and leave the Capitol before he entered the building and that he never once asked an officer for help finding a bathroom. And despite his purported concerns about the tainted envelope, he held onto it for days before throwing it, unsealed, onto the table in his interview with the FBI. The truth is, Gordon said, Barnett took the envelope as a “trophy.”

    “You don’t know the truth, sir,” Barnett shot back.

    Video evidence played during the trial showed Barnett waving the bloodstained envelope outside the Capitol, boasting about his jaunt inside Pelosi’s office suite and the note he left on her desk: “Nancy, Bigo was here, bi-otch.” Prosecutors noted that Barnett tried — while in jail for his alleged Jan. 6 crimes — to have his partner copyright the phrase.

    Throughout his cross-examination, Barnett repeatedly spoke over Gordon’s questioning, often going on tangents or digressions that prompted admonishments from the judge and from Gordon. As Gordon’s questioning drew to a close, Barnett at times grew agitated with the pointed inquiries, saying he was “getting quite tired of it.”

    “I ain’t breaking down,” Barnett said after a particularly tense exchange. “I’ve made mistakes. I went through hell up there. The officers went through hell up there. … I’m struggling with this.”

    Gordon homed in on Barnett’s interaction with two police officers who sought to usher him from Pelosi’s suite. He yelled about “communism” during the first interaction, and during the second, he told the officer “We’re in a war. Pick a side. Don’t be on the wrong side or you’re going to get hurt.”

    Barnett said he was just “blustering” and that he never meant he would be the one to hurt the officer.

    Barnett’s defense attorneys emphasized that he is prone to hyperbole and had no criminal history, that he never committed violence inside the Capitol and turned himself in to law enforcement after driving home to Arkansas. In addition to Barnett’s testimony, his wife Tammy Newburn and his cousin Eileen Halpin testified on his behalf, describing him as a quirky, gregarious but well-liked member of his community.

    Barnett began his testimony by indicating he regretted his actions toward Pelosi and for going to D.C. at all.

    But prosecutors emphasized that Barnett repeatedly agitated against people who supported certifying Joe Biden’s presidential victory, that he viewed “patriots” as people who opposed Biden’s election and repeatedly suggested he would do anything to prevent Biden from taking office.

    [ad_2]
    #fking #idiot #Man #breached #Pelosi #suite #hes #guilty #bluster #crime
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • David Carrick and the crisis of trust in British policing – podcast

    [ad_1]

    The conviction of PC David Carrick for 85 crimes against 12 women, whom he terrorised through violence, abuse, coercion and humiliation, has shaken the Metropolitan police and sent it into a new crisis.

    Allegations against him date to before he joined the police in 2001, and despite multiple complaints against him as an officer, he was allowed to continue serving and received promotions within the force.

    The Guardian’s Emine Sinmaz tells Nosheen Iqbal about how she spoke to one of Carrick’s victims who ultimately did not proceed as a witness in the case. She describes her relationship with the officer who became ever more possessive and controlling and eventually raped her.

    The crime correspondent Vikram Dodd, a veteran of past police scandals, describes his astonishment at the crimes of Carrick and the way they have pitched the Met into a new crisis so soon after the conviction of a serving officer for the murder of Sarah Everard. A culture change is long overdue but it is far from clear how quickly it can be enacted.

    David Carrick

    Photograph: REX/Shutterstock

    Support The Guardian

    The Guardian is editorially independent.
    And we want to keep our journalism open and accessible to all.
    But we increasingly need our readers to fund our work.

    Support The Guardian

    [ad_2]
    #David #Carrick #crisis #trust #British #policing #podcast
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )