Tag: Court

  • Delhi court orders attachment of Hurriyat’s Raj Bagh office

    [ad_1]

    Srinagar, Jan 28: A Delhi Court has ordered attachment of office of All Parties Hurriyat Conference at Raj Bagh, Srinagar.

    In an order, a copy of which is in possession of news agency—Kashmir News Observer (KNO), Shaliender Malik, additional sessions judge, New Delhi district, said the immoveable property i.e. building office of All Parties Hurriyat Conference is ordered to be attached.

    The Court said that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act-1967 does not in any manner hinder powers of court to attach any such property of which accused is facing trial under the UAPA of which he may be partly owner.

    The court, however, added that the attachment in itself does not mean that there is any pre-trial conclusion regarding that property.

    The Court further said that among the different allegations and evidence, it was also the case that office of APHC was the place where meetings held to strategize different protests, funding activities of stone pelting on security forces, recruiting of unemployed youths to carry out unlawful activities as well as terrorist activities to create an unrest in the erstwhile state of Jammu & Kashmir to wage war against the Government of India.

    “In such situation taking into consideration the serious nature of the allegations as against A-5 itself, the fact that he is part owner of the property in question, cannot be a reason for not attaching the property when it is not even made clear as to who others were co-owners of that property,” the court said.

    The NIA had moved an application seeking passing of an order for attachment of building office of All Parties Hurriyat Conference situated at Raj Bagh, Srinagar—(KNO)

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #court #orders #attachment #Hurriyats #Raj #Bagh #office

    ( With inputs from : roshankashmir.net )

  • Mohsin Shaikh murder case: Pune court acquits Hindu outfit leader, 19 others

    Mohsin Shaikh murder case: Pune court acquits Hindu outfit leader, 19 others

    [ad_1]

    Pune: A sessions court has acquitted Hindu Rashtra Sena (HRS) leader Dhananjay Desai and 19 others in the June 2, 2014 murder of IT professional Mohsin Shaikh during the violence.

    The Defence lawyer advocate Milind Pawar who was representing Dhananjay Desai said that all the accused were acquitted on Friday as the evidence on record was not strong enough.

    “All 20 accused including Dhananjay Desai have been acquitted by the Session court today citing lack of evidence,” he said.

    The defence lawyer further said that the prosecutor failed to prove the charge of “criminal conspiracy” on which police had arrested.

    “We had argued in the court that Dhanajay who was allegedly part of a group who had beaten Shaikh was in Yerwada jail on the date of the incident in a different case, but Police have accused and arrested Dhanajay Desai on the charge of criminal conspiracy but Public Prosecutor failed to prove the case,” he further said, adding that the witnesses in the case failed to identify all the accused saying there were dark during the incident.

    Mohsin Shaikh, 28-year-old was killed by a mob during the violence which had erupted at Unnatinagar and adjoining localities in Hadapsar over an objectionable post on social media.

    The case dates back to June 2014 when Shaikh was returning home with a friend after offering evening prayers when he was randomly targeted and attacked by the mob and attacked with hockey sticks and cricket bats. Later, he succumbed to his injuries at a hospital.

    Police had booked 22 people, including two minors, in the case. The two minors were acquitted earlier. The remaining 20 accused were acquitted on Friday.

    Additional sessions judge SB Salunke of the Pune session court pronounced the order.

    [ad_2]
    #Mohsin #Shaikh #murder #case #Pune #court #acquits #Hindu #outfit #leader

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Court allows woman to settle with kid in Australia as father doesn’t turn up after divorce

    Court allows woman to settle with kid in Australia as father doesn’t turn up after divorce

    [ad_1]

    Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has permitted a woman to settle down in Australia with her kid as the father did not turn up to see his child for eight years after getting divorce.

    The bench headed by Justice M. Nagaprasanna has accepted the petition in this regard by the mother seeking to settle down permanently in Australia with the kid. The father also did not turn up to attend the court proceedings in this regard.

    The petitioner had claimed that after divorce, she had settled down in Australia with her second husband. She had questioned the order by the local civil court in Maddur quashing her request to get visa for her child to settle with her in Australia.

    The bench observed that the father had not come to see the child for eight years after obtaining divorce. He did not attend the inquiry regarding visa. All this shows that he does not have any interest in taking care of the child in future.

    The couple got married in 2006 and they had a son. They applied for divorce. The court had given custody of the minor kid to the mother. The court had granted divorce and given permission for the father to meet the kid once in a month.

    But, the father did not turn up to visit his son. Mother got married to another person and settled down in Australia with her kid. The lower court had withdrawn the permission granted to the father of the kid as he did not turn up to see his kid or to attend court proceedings.

    According to Australian law, visa is required for the minor children to stay. The mother had applied in the local court through her father in this regard to obtain visa for her kid. As the local court refused to grant permission, she had appealed the order in the High Court.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Court #woman #settle #kid #Australia #father #doesnt #turn #divorce

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Court Orders Attachment Of Hurriyat Office In Srinagar

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: A Delhi Court has ordered the seizing of All Parties Hurriyat Conference’s (APHC) office in Srinagar’s Rajbagh area in a UAPA case probed by National Investigation Agency (NIA) against Hurriyat leader Nayeem Ahmad Khan.

    Khan, who has been in judicial custody since August 14, 2017, has been accused of “creating unrest” in the Kashmir valley by the National Investigation Agency of India, LiveLaw reported.He was denied bail in December last year.

    Additional Sessions Judge Shailender Malik of Patiala House Courts passed the order on NIA’s plea under section 33(1) of UAPA to attach the office.

    “In view of the above reasons, the immovable property i.e. building office of All Parties Hurriyat Conference situated at Raj Bagh, Srinagar which was carlier used as a office of APHC is ordered to be attached. Necessary legal process be carried out in this regard,” the court said.

    NIA told court that the property is partly owned by Khan along with his associates.

    The office situated at Rajbagh was used to strategize different protests, funding activities of stone pelting on security forces, recruiting of unemployed youths to carry out “unlawful activities as well as terrorist activities” to create an unrest Jammu and Kashmir to wage war against Government of India, according to the NIA.

    It was submitted by Khan’s counsel that the office was only partly owned by him whereas other co-owners were not given any notice before attachment.

    Noting that the property was being used as an office of APHC, the court said that there are many other accused persons besides Khan who were affiliated to the office, who are also facing prosecution in the matter.

    The court also noted that the evidence collected during investigation was duly examined at the stage of framing of charge by a predecessor court which concluded to frame charges against Khan and other accused persons.

    “In that process it is needless to observe that in case any other person who claims to be co-owner and consider that such process of attachment is not proper, can avail legal right in accordance with law,” the court said.

    The court said that attachment of a property in itself does not amount to any bearing upon trial and that the cannot be in any manner be considered as “pre-trial conclusion” or findings of punishment or offence against the accused.
    “It simply means the property of the accused which may like to be forfeited to the State in case of him being convicted of offence of terrorist activities,” the court said.

    It also said that section 33 of UAPA does not hinder the powers of court to attach any such property which may be partly owned by accused.

    “In such situation taking into consideration the serious nature of the allegations as against A-5 itself (Khan), the fact that he is part owner of the property in question, cannot be a reason for not attaching the property when it is not even made clear as to who others were co-owners of that property,” LiveLaw.in quoted the court as having said.

    [ad_2]
    #Court #Orders #Attachment #Hurriyat #Office #Srinagar

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Conman case: Delhi court allows Jacqueline Fernandez to travel abroad

    Conman case: Delhi court allows Jacqueline Fernandez to travel abroad

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A Delhi court on Friday allowed Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez, who is one of the accused in the Rs 200 crore money extortion case involving conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar, to fly to Dubai.

    Fernandez had filed an application on Wednesday to travel from January 27 to 30 ahead of the Pepsico India Conference.

    The Patiala House Courts took note of Fernandez’s submission that she is under a contractual obligation with the company and if she is not able to make it, she could be sued.

    She will be performing at the event on January 29 with other stars.

    The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had however, opposed it and said the actress did not put any contractual obligation on record before.

    Additional Sessions Judge of the Patiala House Courts, Shailendra Malik on Friday granted relief saying that she has professional commitments and personal liberty can’t be curtailed.

    On Monday, he had granted the actress a one-day exemption from personal appearance.

    The Judge was supposed to hear the arguments on framing charges in the matter but adjourned the hearing for February 15.

    Fernandez, even in December last year, had moved a plea seeking to travel abroad to visit her ill mother in Bahrain.

    But, she withdrew it as the court wasn’t willing to allow her to travel abroad.

    In the case, Chandrashekhar is accused of extorting money from politicians, celebrities and businessmen, and allegedly duped pharma company Ranbaxy’s former owner Shivinder Mohan Singh’s wife Aditi Singh of Rs 200 crore.

    He had allegedly sent super expensive gifts to Jacqueline, while he also booked a chartered flight for her from Mumbai to Chennai during his bail period.

    Moreover, according to the ED, it is suspected that he had sent huge chunks of money extorted from Aditi Singh to the actor.

    [ad_2]
    #Conman #case #Delhi #court #Jacqueline #Fernandez #travel

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • 2020 Delhi riots: Court frames charges against two accused

    2020 Delhi riots: Court frames charges against two accused

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A Delhi court has framed charges for various offences, including rioting, against two accused for an alleged attack at the Modern Public Senior Secondary School on Brijpuri main road, during the 2020 riots.

    The court was dealing with a case involving Shamim Ahmed, Mohd Kafil, and Faizan, accused of vandalism and arson on February 25, 2020.

    Faizan, who is the third accused, was declared “proclaimed offender” as he is absconding.

    The court said their common objective was to cause damage to properties as the school’s computer laboratory, library and several other goods were destroyed and the damages estimated up to Rs 1.25 crore as per the complaint.

    On the basis of the statements of the witnesses, the court observed that there was enough material to the charges for what the accused persons have done.

    However, the accused were discharged of charges of criminal conspiracy.

    The court said: “Since the allegations of conspiracy are based on presumption, rather than any concrete evidence, I do not find it sufficient to presume that the accused persons acted out of pre-hatched conspiracy.”

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #riots #Court #frames #charges #accused

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • SC asks Ghaziabad court to defer PMLA case proceedings against Rana Ayyub

    SC asks Ghaziabad court to defer PMLA case proceedings against Rana Ayyub

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said it will hear on January 31, a plea by journalist Rana Ayyub against the summonses issued by a Ghaziabad court in connection with a Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case.

    The top court asked the Ghaziabad court to adjourn the hearing on January 27 and scheduled it after January 31.

    Advocate Vrinda Grover, representing Ayyub, submitted before a bench comprising justices Krishna Murari and V. Ramasubramanian, that petitioner has been summoned by a Ghaziabad court and sought a stay on the coercive proceedings. The counsel argued that she is challenging the jurisdiction and cognizance of this case by PMLA court in Uttar Pradesh and added no part of the offence occurred there. Grover said the liberty of her client is at stake, and questioned whether ED be allowed to drag her to any court in the country.

    Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the ED, opposed her submissions. Mehta said crowdfunding is the new device where you collect money and added, why can she not file for anticipatory bail like all litigants? Every litigant is equal before the eyes of law.

    After hearing arguments, the bench said it will hear the case on January 31 and in the meantime Ghaziabad special court is requested to adjourn the hearing fixed on January 27 to a date after January 31. The top court clarified that this order is being passed because the hearing before it cannot be concluded today due to paucity of time and not on merits.

    The ED, in October last year, had filed a charge sheet against Ayyub, accusing her of cheating the public and utilising charity funds worth Rs 2.69 crore for creating her personal assets, and also violating the foreign contribution law.

    Ayyub moved the apex court seeking quashing of the proceedings initiated by the ED in Ghaziabad. The plea contended that the alleged offence of money laundering occurred in Mumbai, while citing lack of jurisdiction.

    A special PMLA court in Ghaziabad, in November last year, had taken cognizance of the prosecution complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate and summoned Ayyub. The special court said that from the perusal of the entire record there is sufficient evidence as to a prima facie case for taking cognizance against Rana Ayyub with regard to commission of offence.

    The special court has noted the alleged offence is connection with obtaining illegally money from the general public in the name of charity via ‘Ketto’ platform, which is an online crowdfunding platform, in three campaigns without any kind of approval, raising huge amounts in the bank account of her sister and father and later transferring the same to her own bank account which was not used for the intended purpose.

    [ad_2]
    #asks #Ghaziabad #court #defer #PMLA #case #proceedings #Rana #Ayyub

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Hyderabad: Court asks Xiaomi to replace TV or refund customer

    Hyderabad: Court asks Xiaomi to replace TV or refund customer

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: A consumer court here directed technology and mobile giant Xiaomi to either give a man a new TV as replacement for a defect, or to return the amount of Rs 35,999 that he paid for a product and received a faulty one instead. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad-III, also asked Xiaomi to pay the man Rs 5,000 as compensation as well.

    The order dated January 10 from the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission came after B. Mahesh, a resident of Secunderabad approached it with the complaint against Xiaomi. He wrote that he had ordered an LED TV for his home and after verifying all the models he zeroed in on the Mi 125.7 (50 inches) 4K Ultra HD Android Smart LED TV.

    However, the complainant, after purchasing the product online, faced an issue with the Xiaomo TV and contacted its service centre through the customer care.

    According to his complaint, Mahesh said a request was raised for replacement as the TV was faulty, and that the technician who checked it replaced the TV. However, the issue that Mahesh raised that the replacement Xiaomi TV was not a new one and a renewed TV instead. He said that Xiaomi was not ready to give him a new TV as a replacement.

    He added that Xiaomi had said it will provide him with a coupon of invoice worth the amount paid by him for the TV. Mahesh also said he was assured that that it will be processed within 7-10 days (of him being told anout it). After ot receiving the credit or the said refund, Mahesh approached the consumer court as he felt cheated. After going through all the details, the court ruled in his favour.

    It asked Xiaomi to exchange the new TV of the same model or to refund the value of the Mi TV of Rs.35,999 along with a compensation Rs. 5,000 Rs. 2,000 towards costs of the complaint. 

    [ad_2]
    #Hyderabad #Court #asks #Xiaomi #replace #refund #customer

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Cattle scam: ED hopeful as Delhi court rejects Anubrata’s bail plea

    Cattle scam: ED hopeful as Delhi court rejects Anubrata’s bail plea

    [ad_1]

    Kolkata: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) probing the multi-crore cattle smuggling scam in West Bengal is now hopeful of taking Trinamool Congress strongman and the party’s Birbhum district president Anubrata Mondal to Delhi for questioning after the Rouse Avenue Court in the national capital rejected the latter’s bail plea on Tuesday.

    However, sources said that ED will have to wait for a decision of the Delhi High Court on this count.

    “Mondal had adopted the path of approaching multiple courts to stop us from taking him to Delhi for questioning. Accordingly, his counsels moved bail pleas in both Rouse Avenue Court and Delhi High Court. Now with the Rouse Avenue Court rejecting his bail petition, the first hurdle is clear. We will now have to wait for the Delhi High Court’s decision on this count,” said a legal associate of the central agency.

    Mondal’s bodyguard Sehgal Hossain, who was also arrested in connection with the cattle smuggling scam, is currently under judicial custody at Delhi’s Tihar Jail. Sources said that the reason why the ED is so keen to take Mondal to the national capital is to place him face-to-face with Hossain and question the two together.

    The hearing in the matter was scheduled at Delhi High Court on Monday. However, it did not happen because of the absence of the judge concerned and the next date of hearing has been scheduled on February 2.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Cattle #scam #hopeful #Delhi #court #rejects #Anubratas #bail #plea

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • California lawmakers face Supreme Court limits as they weigh response to Lunar New Year shooting

    California lawmakers face Supreme Court limits as they weigh response to Lunar New Year shooting

    [ad_1]

    “California is going to have a tough time in the coming years maintaining its current gun laws, much less enacting and defending new ones,” said Adam Winkler, a UCLA law professor specializing in gun policy.

    The new framework established by the Supreme Court stands in the way of significant actions that lawmakers may want to pursue after a gunman opened fire with an assault weapon during a Lunar New Year celebration in Monterey Park on Saturday night, killing 11 people and wounding nine.

    It was the largest mass shooting in Los Angeles County and many questions, including a motive and whether the weapon or magazine violated state laws, were still unanswered.

    That didn’t stop calls for more restrictions on guns, in California and other states, amid the outpouring of grief and shock in Monterey Park, where a makeshift memorial of flowers and candles was expanding outside the dance hall in the majority Asian-American suburb.

    “Even here in California where we have been pushing for aggressive gun laws, we know that it’s not enough,” said Dave Min, a Democratic candidate for Congress in neighboring Orange County. “Guns come in from other states. They can be illegally procured as apparently happened here.”

    Democratic lawmakers aren’t letting the prospect of conservative judges deter them from passing more laws, said Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel (D-Woodland Hills), who chairs the body’s Gun Violence Prevention Working Group.

    Among the newly-proposed bills this year is another run at an excise tax on ammunition, which failed to get enough votes last year, even in a Democratic supermajority.

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta recently filed a brief backing the New York statute, arguing states must retain the authority to set their own gun laws.

    “If there’s going to be litigation, which is likely, we have a lot of faith and confidence in our attorney general,” Bonta said.

    In a 6-3 ruling, the conservative majority Supreme Court opinion established a new constitutional standard for gun restrictions — and reset disputes over California laws. Measures that had previously passed legal muster were sent back to lower courts. The California Department of Justice is now defending them under a different set of rules.

    “Bruen has created ongoing work for the state of California to prevent others from dismantling the strongest-in-the nation gun safety laws,” said Ari Freilich, the state policy director for the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. “The Supreme Court’s Bruen standard has in some concrete ways basically started the clock over again.”

    California’s ban on assault weapons is entangled in a court fight. So are state laws banning high-capacity magazines, regulating ammunition purchases, and barring 18-to-20-year-olds from buying semi automatic weapons.

    State officials are no stranger to legal challenges, but the new precedent set by the court dramatically changes the landscape — and gun advocates know it, Winkler said.

    Second Amendment groups are seizing the moment, filing lawsuits in the hopes that restrictions get tossed out by the high court. And they very well could.

    The restrictions have not eradicated gun violence from California streets. Past and present lawmakers put the blame in part on relatively lax federal laws and in other states.

    “While California has strong gun laws that prohibit the purchase of assault weapons and extended magazines, the gun industry is all too ready to flood neighboring states with the weapons — highlighting the need for accountability of the firearms industry at a national level,” said Everytown for Gun Safety, a gun control advocacy group, in a statement.

    Following the shooting in Monterey Park, Gov. Gavin Newsom indicated the problem transcended state policy.

    “No other country in the world is terrorized by this constant stream of gun violence,” Newsom said on Twitter. “We need real gun reform at a national level.”

    But with Republicans holding the House, Winkler said there’s “virtually no chance” of gun control legislation out of Congress.

    Democratic lawmakers in California say they are not giving up, but crafting legislation with an eye to the courts. Gabriel has introduced a bill to impose new excise taxes on the sale of guns and ammunition, which he says will fund school safety measures and expand violence prevention programs.

    “We’re not going to sit on our hands,” he said.

    [ad_2]
    #California #lawmakers #face #Supreme #Court #limits #weigh #response #Lunar #Year #shooting
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )