Tag: Court

  • European Commission takes Poland to court over ‘legal Polexit’

    European Commission takes Poland to court over ‘legal Polexit’

    [ad_1]

    The European Commission is taking Poland to court over rulings from Polish judges considered by experts as a “legal Polexit” that fundamentally undermine the EU’s legal order.

    The decision to refer Poland to the European court of justice on Wednesday – described by one expert as a bombshell – comes as Poland’s rightwing nationalist government battles to secure €35.4bn (£31.4bn) in EU Covid recovery funds that have been frozen over concerns about government-influenced courts.

    The latest legal step ratchets up pressure on the Polish government, which faces elections this autumn and has been struggling to convince EU authorities to release billions of grants and loans.

    The EU’s legal case is a response to a July 2021 decision by Poland’s constitutional tribunal that declared measures imposed by the ECJ unconstitutional, a fundamental breach of the principle of the supremacy of EU law, which Warsaw signed up to when it became an member state.

    Legal experts have described the July 2021 decision as “legal Polexit” that could indicate a first step towards Poland’s departure from the union, despite opinion polls showing the popularity of the EU across the country.

    The commission opened legal action against Poland in December 2021, but has only now decided to refer Warsaw to the ECJ, after more than a year of fruitless discussions.

    Announcing the decision on Wednesday, the commission said Poland’s constitutional court had violated EU law and the government had failed to address its concerns.

    “Everyone in the EU should enjoy the fundamental principles and the rights of the EU legal order, including the right to a court that is independent under EU law,” tweeted the EU justice commissioner, Didier Reynders.

    The dispute over the rule of law dates back to the return to power of Poland’s nationalist Law and Justice party in 2015, when it began installing loyalists in the courts. EU officials believe Poland’s constitutional tribunal is no longer an independent and impartial court, owing to “irregularities” in the appointment of its president and senior judges.

    As a result of concerns over the independence of Polish courts, the commission has withheld €35.4bn in recovery grants and loans, pending reforms to Poland’s judicial system. The head of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has laid down three conditions for releasing the funds: dismantling a disciplinary chamber for judges within Poland’s supreme court; changing the judicial disciplinary system; and reinstating judges suspended under current rules.

    But Poland’s government – divided between moderate forces desperate for EU funds and hardliners who oppose backing down – has so far been unable to agree reforms that meet the EU conditions.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    Adding to the uncertainty, Poland’s president, Andrzej Duda, last week refused to sign a key judicial reform bill the government had hoped would meet EU tests and unlock the funds. Duda referred the bill to Poland’s controversial constitutional tribunal for a ruling on its compatibility with Poland’s constitution.

    Jakub Jaraczewski, a researcher at the Berlin-based NGO, Democracy Reporting International, described the commission’s latest legal step as a bombshell, while also criticising the EU executive for acting too slowly.

    He highlighted the widespread view that Poland’s staunch support for Ukraine and help for millions of Ukrainian refugees may have slowed down the commission’s response. “Yes, I know, war, tanks, Poland first to fight, how much you can pile on a country that carries so much weight right now,” he wrote on Twitter. “But Russia will be defeated and the Polish rule of law problem won’t go away with that. So, great that this is happening, but it could have been sooner.”

    [ad_2]
    #European #Commission #takes #Poland #court #legal #Polexit
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Pak court cancels bail of ex-PM Imran Khan in election commission protest case

    Pak court cancels bail of ex-PM Imran Khan in election commission protest case

    [ad_1]

    Islamabad: A Pakistani anti-terrorism court here on Wednesday rejected the bail of former prime minister Imran Khan for failing to attend the court hearing of a case linked to protests outside the election commission, a ruling which could lead to his arrest.

    Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) activists staged a protest after Khan was disqualified by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in the prohibited funding case last year.

    In October last year, Police launched a case under the anti-terrorism laws and the former premier was on interim bail in the case.

    On Wednesday, Judge Raja Jawad Abbas of Anti Terrorism Court (ATC) in Islamabad remarked that Khan had been given enough time to appear before the court but he had failed to do so while his lawyer Babar Awan in his arguments urged the court to grant a one-time exemption from in-person appearance as Khan had not recovered from a gun attack of last year.

    The judge refused to accept the plea and ordered that Khan should appear by stating that the court cannot give any relief to a “powerful person” like Khan which is not given to a common person.

    Finally, the judge refused to extend the interim bail, leaving the 70-year-old cricketer-turned-politician, who survived an assassination attempt in November last year, vulnerable to police arrest.

    The PTI leadership had asked party workers to stage protests across the country, including near the ECP, after Khan was disqualified over hiding details of party funding.

    Separately, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) barred a banking court from passing any direction on Khan’s bail plea in the Federal Investigation Agency’s prohibited funding case against the PTI.

    Last year, the ECP in the funding case against the PTI ruled that the party had received prohibited funding.

    Later, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) registered a case against Khan and other party leaders as signatories/beneficiaries of the PTI account where the funds were parked.

    At the previous hearing, the banking court had rejected Khan’s request for a virtual hearing and asked him to appear in person on February 15.

    During the hearing on Wednesday, the court once again rejected the exemption request and instructed him to appear before the judge in person on Wednesday.

    But Khan had approached the IHC with a request for virtual proceedings which in its order instructed the PTI chief to submit fresh medical reports and stopped the banking court from taking further action in the case till February 22.

    Khan has been facing a raft of cases and once he jokingly remarked that the only case he was not booked so far was the “crime of dipping rusk in tea before eating them”.

    [ad_2]
    #Pak #court #cancels #bail #exPM #Imran #Khan #election #commission #protest #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Delhi court sentences 4 AQIS operatives to seven years, 5 months in jail

    Delhi court sentences 4 AQIS operatives to seven years, 5 months in jail

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A Delhi court on Tuesday handed seven years and five months’ jail terms to four Al-Qaida in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) operatives, who were convicted on February 10 of conspiracy for the commission of a terrorist act.

    Special Judge Sanjay Khanagwal of Patiala House Court sentenced Mohd Asif, Mohd Abdul Rehman, Zafar Masood and Abdul Sami. The court had convicted the four under the relevant Sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

    According to the convicts’ counsel, the four have already spent about seven years in jail, which will be taken into consideration as part of the punishment.

    However, on the basis of the offences proved by the prosecution, life imprisonment is the maximum punishment.

    On February 10, two suspects, Syed Mohd Zishan Ali and Sabeel Ahmed were acquitted.

    On December 14, 2015, the police arrested Asif, a resident of Sambhal in Uttar Pradesh, who was found to be the India head of AQIS.

    “On the basis of his revelations, Zafar Masood was also arrested from Sambhal on December 15, 2015 and Mohd Abdul Rehman was nabbed from Cuttack, Odisha on December 16, 2015,” a senior police officer of Delhi Police’s Special Cell had said.

    According to the police, Rehman had visited Pakistan illegally and met top militants there including Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi and Sajid Mir, both wanted for the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks.

    “Abdul Sami, a resident of Jamshedpur (Jharkhand) was apprehended from Mewat on January 17, 2016. He was a Pakistan-trained militant,” the police had said.

    During investigation, the names of the two who were acquitted also surfaced as part of a conspiracy for providing financial and logistics assistance to the cadres of AQIS in the UAE.

    “Ali was deported from UAE in 2017 and was arrested in this case whereas Sabeel Ahmad was deported in 2020. Sabeel was initially arrested in a terror case in Bengaluru (Karnataka) by NIA from IGI Airport in Delhi and later on, he was arrested in this case,” the official had said.

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #court #sentences #AQIS #operatives #years #months #jail

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Court Rejects Bail To Five Solders Arrested In Drug Peddling

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: A Kashmir court has turned down the bail application of five soldiers who were arrested in a drug peddling case, NDTV reported. The court ruled that their detention is required to lay hands on other accused.

    The five soldiers were operating the drug-peddling gang while being posted at Panzgam in Kupwara. They were arrested last month and accused for running the drug cartel from Tangdhar, a border town located on the Line of Control (LoC).

    The bail application was moved before the Additional district and sessions judge, Kupwara, who rejected the plea. The court observed that soldiers were supposed to protect society but regretted this bunch worked in contravention of it.

    “According to the police, drugs were coming from Pakistan through Tangdhar sector and five soldiers posted in Panzgam area of Kupwara were involved in drug trafficking,” the NDTV report said, identifying the accused soldiers as Naib-Subedar Puran Singh, Anil Kumar (driver) Sepoy Sushil Kumar, Naik Waseem Ahmad Mir and Mohammad Shafiq Khan.

    The soldiers apparently were working with four civilians who were identified as Mashkoor Sheikh (working as a porter with Army), Mohammad Yousaf Kothari, Saleem Sheikh and Mohammad Imran Teli.

    This is the second time in the last two months that security personnel have been arrested for drug smuggling from the Line of Control in Kupwara district.

    The report said that federal investigator, NIA arrested a BSF officer posted in Handwara – also part of the frontier Kupwara district, “on charges of cross-border drug smuggling linked with the Lashkar-e-Toiba terrorist group”. Identified as Romesh Kumar, report said Rs 91 lakh cash was recovered from Kumar.

    [ad_2]
    #Court #Rejects #Bail #Solders #Arrested #Drug #Peddling

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Court junks Nirav Modi sister’s plea for ED intervention in US bankruptcy matter

    Court junks Nirav Modi sister’s plea for ED intervention in US bankruptcy matter

    [ad_1]

    Mumbai: A special court on Monday rejected a plea of Purvi Mehta, sister of fugitive diamond trader and PNB scam accused Nirav Modi, seeking a direction to the Enforcement Directorate to intervene in bankruptcy proceedings underway against him in the United States where she has been made a defendant.

    In the plea, filed in April last year before the special court for cases under the Fugitive Economics Offenders (FEO) Act, Mehta (47) had said the ED should be directed to intervene in the case before a US court and seek injunction at least with respect to assets concerning her.

    She has turned an approver in the bank fraud case filed under provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

    Special judge S M Menjoge, after hearing prosecution and defence sides, rejected Mehta’s plea, saying there was no provision in the FEO Act by which the relief sought by her can be granted.

    This court cannot prevent any person from prosecuting any matter either in India or outside the country, the judge observed.

    Nirav Modi, a key accused in the Rs 13,000-crore scam at state-run Punjab National Bank (PNB), was declared a fugitive economic offender in December 2019. The 51-year-old diamantaire is currently lodged in a UK prison.

    In June 2020, a special PMLA court in Mumbai ordered confiscation of his properties which the ED claimed had been bought using proceeds of crime.

    In her plea, Mehta, who has turned an approver in the PMLA case against Nirav Modi and others, said she had been made a defendant in bankruptcy proceedings against her brother in a US court.

    It means her properties are also being considered by the US court and its proceedings overlap with those in India related to her, Mehta’s plea had said.

    The ED should be directed to intervene in the case before the US court, and seek an injunction at least with respect to assets concerning her, said the plea.

    Lawyers representing PNB, which is the victim of the multi-crore fraud, submitted before the court that Mehta’s plea was not maintainable.

    The ED also strongly objected to her plea, saying Mehta’s properties had been already attached as per provisions of the FEO Act.

    There was no provision in the FEO Act to direct the central agency to intervene in US court proceedings, it told the court.

    The special court, while rejecting Mehta’s plea, pointed out that she’s an approver in the PMLA case and not in this matter (filed under the FEO Act) and therefore she cannot claim be an interested party.

    Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi, owners of prominent jewellery firms, are accused of cheating the nationalized bank to the tune of Rs 13,000 crore by fraudulently obtaining Letters of Undertaking which act as bank guarantee while taking loans in foreign countries.

    Purvi Mehta and her husband Maiank Mehta were made approvers in the bank fraud case in January 2021 on condition of making full and true disclosure before the PMLA court.

    [ad_2]
    #Court #junks #Nirav #Modi #sisters #plea #intervention #bankruptcy #matter

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Telangana: High Court stays Kamareddy Master Plan

    Telangana: High Court stays Kamareddy Master Plan

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court on Monday ordered a stay in the Kamareddy Master Plan petition filed by K A Paul of Praja Shanthi party. 

    The division bench constituting Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice N Tukaramji issued directions to the state government not to revive the issuing of the new draft of the Kamareddy Master Plan. The matter has been postponed for the next hearing on April 17. 

    Speaking to the media, K A Paul said, “The government had earlier said that the plan cannot be sacked as Rs 10,000 crores are involved in it. What does that have to do with us? Anything that is not agreeable to the farmers must not be carried out.” 

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Telangana #High #Court #stays #Kamareddy #Master #Plan

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Delimitation In JK

    Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Delimitation In JK

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: The Supreme Court Monday dismissed a petition challenging the delimitation of Assembly and parliamentary constituencies in Jammu and Kashmir, according to Bar and Bench.

    Dismissing the plea filed by two Kashmir residents — Abdul Gani Khan and Muhammad Ayub Matto — the bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and AS Oka said that it has not ruled upon the validity of the Jammu & Kashmir Re-organisation Act, 2019, which is pending before the Supreme Court among the batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution.

    Delimitation is the act of redrawing boundaries of an Assembly or Lok Sabha seat to represent changes in population over time. A commission set up by the Centre submitted its final report for the delimitation in Jammu and Kashmir in May last year.

    In December, the apex court reserved its judgment on a plea challenging constitution of the commission. The petitioners had argued that under the 2019 Act, only the Election Commission is empowered to conduct the delimitation exercise. However, the Centre stated that the J&K Reorganisation Act of 2019 mandates the commission to do it, reported Bar and Bench .

    [ad_2]
    #Supreme #Court #Dismisses #Plea #Challenging #Delimitation

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • National Lok Adalat held at District Court Complex Shopian

    National Lok Adalat held at District Court Complex Shopian

    [ad_1]

    SHOPIAN, 11th February, 2023:-In pursuance of the National Legal Service Authority calendar and under the directions of J &K Legal Services Authority, a National Lok Adalat was organized in premises of District Court Complex Shopian under the Chairmanship of Riyaz-Ul-Haq Mirza, Chairman District Legal Services Authority (Principal District & Session Judge) Shopian.

    In order to have maximum response and settlements between the parties in cases like MACT, matrimonial, cheque bounce cases under NI Act, Money recovery cases, etc., it was advised to organize pre-Lok Adalat sittings or pre-counselling sessions well before the date of National Lok Adalat so that parties may get one or more chances for entering into negotiation/dialogue with the opposite parties.

    In the said National Lok Adalat, 03 Benches were constituted by the DLSA which were headed by Pr. District & Sessions Judge Shopian, Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate Shopian and Tehsildar Shopian.

    Total no of 108 Cases related to recovery suits, Traffic Challan’s, Civil Cases, Matrimonial Cases and Criminal Compoundable cases were taken up, out of which 73 Cases were settled amicably in the today’s National Lok Adalat with a settlement amount Rs.41,77,133.

    Advocates, litigants and other prominent citizens also participated in the Lok Adalat.

    [ad_2]
    #National #Lok #Adalat #held #District #Court #Complex #Shopian

    ( With inputs from : roshankashmir.net )

  • Court order against five Indians for ‘exploiting’ students in UK

    Court order against five Indians for ‘exploiting’ students in UK

    [ad_1]

    London: A UK government investigative agency for labour exploitation has said that it has succeeded in getting a court order against five people from Kerala for suspected labour abuse of more than 50 Indian students.

    Investigators from the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA) were granted a Slavery and Trafficking Risk Order (STRO) indefinitely against the defendants at Mold Magistrates’ Court last week.

    The GLAA said in a release that its probe identified “more than 50 Indian students as being potential victims of modern slavery and labour abuse over the last 14 months” while working at care homes in North Wales.

    The five, between the age groups of 25 to 47, have been identified as Mathew Issac and Jinu Cherian from Abergele, Eldhose Cherian, Eldhose Kuriachan and Jacob Liju from Pwllheli, a statement released by the AGLAA said.

    They were arrested by the GLAA between December 2021 and May 2022. Investigations are ongoing but there have been no criminal charges at this stage.

    Reacting to the report, the Indian High Commission in the UK on Friday appealed to the Indian students to reach out for help and counselling.

    “We were concerned to read this news. Indian students who have suffered this, please contact us at pol3.london@mea.gov.in, and we will provide help/counselling. We assure you of confidentiality in our response,” the Indian High Commission tweeted.

    GLAA said Issac and his wife Jinu Cherian also supplied workers through Alexa Care Solutions, a recruitment agency registered in May 2021.

    Reports to the Modern Slavery and Exploitation Helpline three months later claimed that Indian workers employed by Alexa Care were not being paid correctly or were having their wages withheld.

    Significant concerns were raised at the same time about the workers’ appearance and that they always appeared to be hungry, the agency revealed.

    The STRO orders all five to inform the GLAA of any change of name or address within seven days, and allow GLAA access, at any reasonable time, to where they are living to establish and confirm that the STRO is being complied with.

    Breaching the order is a criminal offence carrying a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

    “We are all aware that staffing levels have been a cause concern in the care sector for some time, and have not been helped by the Covid pandemic,” GLAA Senior Investigating Officer Martin Plimmer said.

    “Unfortunately, where labour shortages exist, there is an increased risk of opportunists using the situation for their own financial gain, usually at the expense of workers that they are exploiting.

    “Tackling the exploitation of workers in care homes is one of the GLAA’s top priorities, and this order is crucial in restricting the activities of those we suspect would otherwise commit slavery or trafficking offences,” Plimmer said in a GLAA statement.

    In the UK, the number of people identified as victims of modern slavery has been rising year on year, with over 12,000 people referred to the authorities in 2021, according to rights body Anti-Slavery International.

    The real number of people trapped in slavery is estimated to be much higher — more than 130,000 people — and is estimated to cost the UK 33 billion pounds per year, it said.

    [ad_2]
    #Court #order #Indians #exploiting #students

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • 2020 Delhi riots: Court acquits 2 of charges of rioting, arson

    2020 Delhi riots: Court acquits 2 of charges of rioting, arson

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A court here on Friday acquitted two people of all charges connected to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, saying “presumption cannot take the place of evidence”.

    The court was hearing a case against accused Ranjeet Singh Rana and Ravi Singh who were accused of being part of a riotous mob that torched a car on February 24, 2020 and committed arson and vandalism in two salons or shops in the Karawal Nagar area the next day.

    “I find that charges levelled against the accused persons in this case are not proved beyond doubt. Hence, accused persons…are acquitted of all the charges levelled against them in this case,” additional sessions judge Pulastya Pramachala said.

    The judge said that on the basis of the testimony of the person who was driving the car, it could be held that a riotous mob had torched it, but the prosecution evidence fell short of giving an exact account of the facts regarding the two other incidents.

    “…On close scrutiny of evidences, I find that prosecution could show involvement of mob only in respect of the incident of damage caused to the car of Prosecution Witness 1 (person driving the car) and it is basically on the basis of (his) unrebutted testimony…that factum of burning his car by an unlawful assembly is established,” the judge said.

    Also, the prosecution did not submit the requisite certificates under Section 65B of the Evidence Act for the two shops and without such certificate, digitally taken photographs were not admissible as evidence, the judge said.

    “This court had given direction, for all the cases of riots, to obtain such certificates from the persons concerned…and these directions were even sent to higher officers of the police…. All prosecutors were also time and again reminded about such legal requirements, but as far as this case is concerned, no such steps were taken by the investigating officer (IO),” the judge said.

    “I find that the prosecution has left it for making guesses and presumptions only to assume that there had been an unlawful assembly behind these two incidents,” the judge added.

    Regarding the identity of the accused persons as part of the riotous mob, the court said that two of the complainants turned hostile and denied having identified the accused persons.

    Another eyewitness, a head constable, could not vouch for involvement of the accused persons as he had not seen the incidents, the court said.

    It said the police official stated that he saw both the accused present at some distance there and thus it was only the prosecution’s presumption that both accused were involved in the incidents.

    “However, presumption cannot take the place of evidence. Prosecution witness 1 was the best person to identify the accused persons, if they were involved in the attack upon his car and when (he) did not identify the accused persons, then presumptions of prosecution cannot be basis to hold that both accused were members of that mob,” the court said.

    “Thus, I find that prosecution could not prove that incidents at the salons…were caused by an unlawful assembly. Prosecution also could not prove that both the accused persons were involved in any of the three incidents probed in this case,” the judge said.

    The Karawal Nagar police station had registered an FIR against the two accused under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including rioting, on the basis of three complaints.

    [ad_2]
    #Delhi #riots #Court #acquits #charges #rioting #arson

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )