Tag: colonial

  • UN representatives criticise Germany over reparations for colonial crimes in Namibia

    UN representatives criticise Germany over reparations for colonial crimes in Namibia

    [ad_1]

    UN special rapporteurs have criticised the German and Namibian governments for violating the rights of Herero and Nama ethnic minorities by excluding them from talks over reparations for colonial crimes against their ancestors.

    Publishing their communication with both governments, the seven UN representatives urged Germany to take responsibility for all its colonial crimes in Namibia – including mass murder – and said it was wrong for the Herero and Nama to have been involved indirectly in talks via an advisory committee. They called on Germany to pay reparations directly to the Herero and Nama and not to the Namibian government.

    The special rapporteurs have concentrated on getting to the bottom of suspected contraventions of international law. They were assigned the roles by the UN human rights council as independent experts, but are not being paid by the international body. Governments cannot be forced to act on their reports. However, they are seen to have a strong influence.

    At the heart of the matter is the brutal murder of tens of thousands of Herero and Nama between 1904 and 1908 when Germany was the colonial power in what was then German South West Africa.

    In January, lawyers in Namibia operating on behalf of the Herero and Nama submitted a claim to a Namibian court, urging it to declare the “joint declaration” between Germany and Namibia invalid as it contravened various articles in the Namibian constitution. If the claim is successful the agreement would have to be negotiated anew.

    The governments in Berlin and Windhoek agreed the declaration in 2021 after years of discussion. However, it has never been signed because of its rejection by several Herero and Nama associations, who demanded a direct participation in the negotiations, as well as reparations. Agreement had been made on German payments of about €1.1bn (£1bn) over a period of three decades to finance development projects.

    In February, the rapporteurs dispatched their letter expressing “grave concerns” over violation of international law to the German and Namibian governments, granting them 60 days to respond, within which timeframe the letter would remain confidential. The German government acknowledged the significance of the rapporteurs’ work and asked for an extension. The Namibian government has so far failed to respond.

    In their letter, the rapporteurs said Berlin must acknowledge its responsibility “for the crimes carried out during its era of colonial rule”, adding that the agreement failed to include any effective reparation measures or the necessary means for reconciliation.

    Berlin’s plans for reconstruction and development programmes were insufficient to compensate the victims and their descendants for the “scale of the damage that was done to them”. That included the harm suffered as a result of the mass killings, including “starvation, torture, gendered violence, forced labour and loss of property”, the effects of which are felt today. They said development aid as a form of reparation was also in danger of “perpetuating rather than rectifying, colonial dynamics”. They were also critical of the way in which the negotiations had been kept secret.

    Karina Theuer, an expert in international law and an adviser to lawyers in Namibia, said it would be necessary to start a new negotiation process. She told the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: “This must be transparent and in compliance with legal minimum standards.”

    In February, Gaob Johannes Isaak, the chair of the Nama Traditional Leaders Association, told the Guardian: “Reparations would bring back dignity, self-worth and play a meaningful role in our own development and education for the Nama people so we can share equally in the resources of Namibia.”

    [ad_2]
    #representatives #criticise #Germany #reparations #colonial #crimes #Namibia
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • Penny Wong’s London speech about UK’s colonial history caused no ‘diplomatic tension’

    Penny Wong’s London speech about UK’s colonial history caused no ‘diplomatic tension’

    [ad_1]

    The Australian foreign affairs minister’s speech in London about Britain’s colonial history caused “no sense of discomfort or diplomatic tension” with the UK, a senior official has declared.

    The Coalition opposition used a committee hearing in Canberra on Thursday to suggest that Penny Wong’s remarks caused an unnecessary “distraction” during annual high-level talks between Australia and the UK.

    During a wide-ranging speech in London two weeks ago, Wong welcomed the UK’s “tilt” to the Indo-Pacific region but also reflected on different experiences of British colonisation.

    Wong, who was born in Malaysia, said her father was descended from Hakka and Cantonese Chinese, and many from those clans “worked as domestic servants for British colonists, as did my own grandmother”.

    Wong told an audience at King’s College London such stories “can sometimes feel uncomfortable” but it “gives us the opportunity to find more common ground than if we stayed sheltered in narrower versions of our countries’ histories”.

    This aspect of the speech attracted media attention in the UK, with the Telegraph running a story under the headline: “‘Woke’ Australian diplomat tells UK to confront its colonial past.”

    But Wong said on Thursday that at no point had she used the word “confront”. After the King’s College speech, Wong and the defence minister, Richard Marles, joined their counterparts James Cleverly and Ben Wallace for talks in Portsmouth.

    The most senior official at Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Jan Adams, who attended the meetings, said the colonialism comments were “not the mainstay of the discussions both formally and informally”.

    “We spent a lot of time together. Frankly it was, in the context of modern Britain, an unexceptional comment,” Adams told a Senate estimates committee.

    “There was no sense of discomfort or diplomatic tension whatsoever. I can say that with complete confidence.”

    Wong said she had been seeking to make the point that “if we recognise our history and we recognise how we have changed, we find more common ground” with other countries in the Indo-Pacific.

    She said such an approach also helped to “deal with some of the ways in which others seek to constrain us”. Chinese diplomats have sought to portray the Aukus security deal among Australia, the US and the UK as an “Anglo-Saxon clique”.

    Wong mentioned that Australia was seeking to “challenge disinformation” and projecting Australia’s modern multicultural image was about increasing Australia’s influence and power in the region.

    She said such a message was important “in the context of Aukus and the Quad” partnership with India, Japan and the US.

    The opposition’s Senate leader, Simon Birmingham, who led the questioning, also mentioned “the importance of balance” and taking care with “how you put your messages”.

    He asked whether there were positive aspects of “the UK’s historical contribution around systems of democracy, systems of justice”.

    Wong answered: “Of course there are.”

    skip past newsletter promotion

    Asked about comments by News Corp’s Greg Sheridan that this was the “worst and strangest speech of Penny Wong’s life”, the minister said she had “a lot of regard” for the author but would “tell him to relax”.

    “I maintain my view that working on how we maximise Australian influence, including in how we speak about who we are and recognise where others are, is a central part of the job of anyone in this role.”

    Speaking at a post-meeting press conference in Portsmouth two weeks ago, Cleverly confirmed the talks did address “the nature of the relationship between the UK and other countries which are now in the Commonwealth but which were previously British colonies”.

    But Cleverly said these were “not the mainstay of the conversations”.

    In a separate interview with Australia’s Nine newspapers shortly after the speech, Cleverly was asked whether the UK had satisfactorily confronted its colonial past.

    “You’re asking the black foreign secretary of the United Kingdom of Great Britain?” Cleverly replied. “Yeah, I think the answer is yes – you’re looking at it, you’re talking to it!

    “I mean, the bottom line is we have a prime minister of Asian heritage, you have a home secretary of Asian heritage, you have a foreign secretary of African heritage.”

    Cleverly said history mattered but “what matters more is the stuff we can do in the future”.

    Australia is finalising the details of its plans to acquire at least eight nuclear-powered submarines with help from the UK and the US.

    Leaders of the three Aukus countries – Anthony Albanese, Rishi Sunak and Joe Biden – are expected to make an announcement next month.

    [ad_2]
    #Penny #Wongs #London #speech #UKs #colonial #history #caused #diplomatic #tension
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )