Tag: Case

  • One More Arrested In Rs 70 Cr Heroin Smuggling Case: Police

    One More Arrested In Rs 70 Cr Heroin Smuggling Case: Police

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: Police on Friday arrested third accused in connection with recovery huge haul of heroin worth 70 crores in Srinagar district.

    Police have already arrested two persons including a CRPF trooper in connection with the recovery of over 11 kilograms of heroin and recovery of cash 11,82500 at Rajbagh area of Srinagar.

    A senior police officer said that third arrest was culminated in connection with case today and he identified the accused person as Rashid Kohli son of Late Satar Mohd Kohli resident of Amdohi Karnah Kupwara.

    He said that preliminary investigations suggest that paramilitary trooper Sajad Ahmad Badana hailing from Karnah and posted with 160 BN of CRPF in Chatha, Satwari Jammu, is the main kingpin in the case.

    “Further investigations are underway and entire nexus behind this will be unraveled,”.

    Pertinently, ADGP Kashmir Vijay Kumar had said that it was part of cross-border smuggling,drugs have come from Pakistan.  (GNS)

    [ad_2]
    #Arrested #Heroin #Smuggling #Case #Police

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Video: Bandi Sanjay released from Karimnagar jail on bail in SSC paper leak case

    Video: Bandi Sanjay released from Karimnagar jail on bail in SSC paper leak case

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: Telangana BJP president and MP Bandi Sanjay was on Friday released from Karimnagar jail after he was granted bail in the SSC paper leak case.

    Sanjay was detained by police late Wednesday night from his Karimnagar residence. He was granted bail by a magistrate court in the paper leak case on Thursday.

    “The court accepted our request and a bail was granted to Bandi Sanjay on sureties worth Rs 20,000. On production of the release order, he will be released from the Karimnagar jail, ” Bandi Sanjay’s lawyer Shyam Sunder Reddy informed on Thursday.

    MS Education Academy

    “However, the court set a condition that he can’t leave India without permission,” the advocate added.

    On Wednesday, Bandi Sanjay along with three others was sent to judicial custody till April 19 in the SSC paper leak case.

    “Bandi Sanjay and 3 others have been sent to judicial custody till April 19 and will be shifted to Karimnagar jail,” advocate Karuna Sagar, another lawyer of the BJP state chief, had said.

    “We will file contempt proceedings against the investigating officer for violating the SC guidelines. We are planning to challenge the order in High Court tomorrow,” the lawyer had added.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Video #Bandi #Sanjay #released #Karimnagar #jail #bail #SSC #paper #leak #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Video: Bandi Sanjay released from Karimnagar jail on bail in SSC paper leak case

    Video: Bandi Sanjay released from Karimnagar jail on bail in SSC paper leak case

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: Telangana BJP president and MP Bandi Sanjay was on Friday released from Karimnagar jail after he was granted bail in the SSC paper leak case.

    Sanjay was detained by police late Wednesday night from his Karimnagar residence. He was granted bail by a magistrate court in the paper leak case on Thursday.

    “The court accepted our request and a bail was granted to Bandi Sanjay on sureties worth Rs 20,000. On production of the release order, he will be released from the Karimnagar jail, ” Bandi Sanjay’s lawyer Shyam Sunder Reddy informed on Thursday.

    MS Education Academy

    “However, the court set a condition that he can’t leave India without permission,” the advocate added.

    On Wednesday, Bandi Sanjay along with three others was sent to judicial custody till April 19 in the SSC paper leak case.

    “Bandi Sanjay and 3 others have been sent to judicial custody till April 19 and will be shifted to Karimnagar jail,” advocate Karuna Sagar, another lawyer of the BJP state chief, had said.

    “We will file contempt proceedings against the investigating officer for violating the SC guidelines. We are planning to challenge the order in High Court tomorrow,” the lawyer had added.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Video #Bandi #Sanjay #released #Karimnagar #jail #bail #SSC #paper #leak #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • SI Scam: Court denies bail to three suspects in SI recruitment scam case

    [ad_1]

    SI Scam: Court denies bail to three suspects in SI recruitment scam case

    The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh Court turned down the bail requests of three people who were accused of the JK Service Selection Board Police sub-inspector exam scam.

    Ashsish Yadav, Sunrender Singh, and Pawan Kumar were in jail because they were suspected of taking part in the well-known SI hire scam. After hearing both sides, Second Additional Sessions Judge Jammu Balbir Lal Jaswal turned down their bail requests.

    The court said that they are accused of leaking the paper of the J&K Police Sub Inspector, which hurt the future of young people. The court said that the accused man’s actions can’t be compared to scams that involve millions of Rupees. Instead, they are an example of an organised crime that hurts the public as a whole. After figuring out how bad the situation was, the court said that if the accused had been successful in their plan, unqualified candidates would have been able to get top jobs. This would have hurt the qualified candidates and deprived society of qualified officers.

    The court said that the suspects knew what they were doing and did it on purpose to make money for themselves, no matter what effect it had on the students and their parents. The court also said that if bail was given to these criminals while the investigation was still going on, it would hurt the feelings of the people as a whole and slow down the investigation.

    The court didn’t say what it thought about the case itself, and it said that its comments were only meant to help with the question of bail. The accused committed a major crime that could get them up to 7 years in prison, and there was no reason to consider their bail at this point.

    CRPF 9000+ Recruitment 2023 – Apply Link Available

    JKPSC Fresh Recruitment 2023

    Jammu Srinagar Daily Highway Traffic updates

    Join Telegram | Install App for Iphone and Android

     



    [ad_2]
    #Scam #Court #denies #bail #suspects #recruitment #scam #case

    ( With inputs from : The News Caravan.com )

  • Case Creation 10D Matte Glass for Apple iPAD Mini 4 (7.9 inch), Matt/Matte Full Coverage Tempered Glass for Apple iPAD Mini 4 (7.9 inch) (2020) / iPAD Mini 4-inch (New Launch) Multi-Coloured

    Case Creation 10D Matte Glass for Apple iPAD Mini 4 (7.9 inch), Matt/Matte Full Coverage Tempered Glass for Apple iPAD Mini 4 (7.9 inch) (2020) / iPAD Mini 4-inch (New Launch) Multi-Coloured

    31bIeCvISbL410WROkYgfL41Gea48HPSL41n2q+lcqDL411La0Z+SEL41UgbIOSAQL41+R0gydtwL
    Price: [price_with_discount]
    (as of [price_update_date] – Details)

    ISRHEWs
    [ad_1]

    The perfect matte surface has silk like touch feeling, magically resists dirt, sweat and annoying fingerprints, very little frictional resistance even for hand sweating. Easy to game or flick operation, “Comfortable Game Operation”.
    A special polishing is crafted to edge of the glass to give a more smooth touch feeling, go further than 2.5D round edge, not easy to be broken and extremely durable.9H hardness, protect your Phone screen from scratches, daily wear and drops.
    What is included:1 piece Case Creation matte screen protector for Phone,1 cleaning set, , all these are in beautiful retail package. 100% Satisfaction by Case Creation free of charge, feel free to contact our customer service if there’s any problem.

    [ad_2]
    #Case #Creation #10D #Matte #Glass #Apple #iPAD #Mini #inch #MattMatte #Full #Coverage #Tempered #Glass #Apple #iPAD #Mini #inch #iPAD #Mini #4inch #Launch #MultiColoured

  • SC shuts contempt plea against Delhi police in hate speech case

    SC shuts contempt plea against Delhi police in hate speech case

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday closed activist Tushar Gandhi’s contempt plea against the Delhi Police after taking note of submissions that a charge sheet in a case of hate speeches made at religious assemblies in the national capital in 2021 was filed in a court here.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice J B Pardiwala considered the submissions of Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj, appearing for the Delhi Police, that a charge sheet after conclusion of the investigation was filed in a court of the Metropolitan Magistrate here on April 4.

    “In view of the filing of the charge sheet, it is not expedient in the interest of justice to continue with the present contempt petition,” the bench said.

    MS Education Academy

    The bench refused to direct Delhi police that a copy of the charge sheet be made available to Gandhi, who is not part of the proceedings before the trial court.

    “Now the charge sheet is filed, our role has come to an end,” the bench said, adding that now the proceedings in the trial court will be conducted as per the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

    Earlier, the Delhi Police had said the investigation into the case was at an advanced stage and a probe report will be filed shortly.

    Nataraj had said that the police were expecting a Forensic Science Laboratory report on voice samples of the accused and the charge sheet will be filed after that.

    The hate speech case is related to a Hindu Yuva Vahini event organised in Delhi under the leadership of Suresh Chavhanke, the editor of ‘Sudarshan News’, in December 2021.

    Lawyer Shadan Farasat, appearing for activist Gandhi, had said the police did not take any concrete steps to prevent such hate speeches.

    The apex court had on January 13 posed a volley of questions to the Delhi Police over the delay in registration of FIR and “no palpable progress” in the investigation of a case of hate speeches made at religious assemblies in the national capital in 2021 and sought a report from the investigating officer.

    The top court was hearing a contempt petition filed by Gandhi alleging inaction by the Uttarakhand Police and Delhi Police in alleged hate speech cases.

    On November 11 last year, the bench had discharged the Uttarakhand government and its police chief from a list of parties to the contempt plea.

    The contempt petition was filed seeking punishment for the police chiefs of Delhi and Uttarakhand for their alleged inaction in the cases in violation of the apex court judgement in the Tehseen Poonawala case.

    In the judgement, the top court had laid down guidelines as to what action needed to be taken in hate crimes, including mob lynching.

    In his petition, the activist sought contempt action against senior police officers for not taking any steps in accordance with the top court’s guidelines meant to curb hate speeches and mob lynching.

    The plea claimed that immediately after the events took place, the speeches were available in public domain, still the Uttarakhand Police and the Delhi Police did not act against the offenders.

    The hate speeches were made at the ‘dharma sansad’ held in Haridwar from December 17 to 19, 2021 and in Delhi on December 19, 2021, the petition alleged.

    [ad_2]
    #shuts #contempt #plea #Delhi #police #hate #speech #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • ED freezes Rs 18.79 crore of Hyderabad company in PMLA case

    ED freezes Rs 18.79 crore of Hyderabad company in PMLA case

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday said that they have frozen Rs 18.79 crore held in 18 bank accounts of a Hyderabad-based company Multyjet Trade Pvt Ltd, its promoter director Tekula Mukthiraj and others in a PMLA case.

    The ED initiated investigation under PMLA on the basis of an FIR registered by Central Crime Station, Hyderabad against Multyjet Trade Pvt Ltd, Tekula Mukthiraj and others for indulging in fraudulent multi-level marketing and investment schemes.

    “Investigation under PMLA revealed that Multyjet Trade Pvt Ltd, Tekula Mukthiraj and others duped general public in the guise of an investment scheme. For this, a website by the name www.multyjettrade.com was created on which the victims were shown their virtual accounts to give an impression that they were earning profits from commodity trading.

    MS Education Academy

    In this manner, Multyjet Trade Pvt Ltd collected more than Rs 100 crore from general public in a short span of 3-4 months between August 2022 and November 2022 in Ponzi scheme,” the ED said.

    Initially, Multyjet Trade Pvt Ltd provided returns on the money invested by the public. However, over a period of time, they stopped responding to the investors and eventually closed their operations.

    Tekula Mukthiraj, in connivance with his associates, routed the proceeds of crime in his and his wife’s bank accounts as well as the bank accounts of firms controlled by him namely, TMR Infra and Developers, Real Life Infra and Developers and Radhe Radhe Krishna Infra and Developers.

    Further investigation in the matter is on.

    [ad_2]
    #freezes #crore #Hyderabad #company #PMLA #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Wisconsin and Chicago elections expose liabilities in GOP case for ’24

    Wisconsin and Chicago elections expose liabilities in GOP case for ’24

    [ad_1]

    election 2023 chicago mayor 46031

    Similarly, Brandon Johnson, a Chicago union organizer, was hammered by his rival for previously leaning into the “defund the police” movement. But he stressed that his opponent Paul Vallas was not actually a Democrat, forcing him to repeatedly defend his credentials.

    Both Protasiewicz and Johnson prevailed.

    “Voters showed that they understand public safety to be much more nuanced than the way the Republicans try to frame it. That this is not just about having adequate law enforcement on the streets to promote public safety, but also about investing in mental health and substance use treatment and addressing poverty,” Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said in an interview with POLITICO. “There are not just the short-term efforts to address crime, but also the long-term efforts.”

    While both of Tuesday night’s races were nonpartisan, they did each contain a left vs. right ideological contrast that offered a temperature reading as to where voters stood on key issues. Johnson emphasized taxes on the ultrarich, while Protasiewicz played up protection for abortion rights as well as voters’ concerns about threats to U.S. democracy.

    The through-line issue, however, was crime.

    It wasn’t lost on state or national officials that had Johnson lost the race, they would have been forced to push back hard on the narrative that his “defund” position cost them the keys to City Hall. Instead, while concerns over crime did indeed dominate the race, voters weren’t buying solutions that simply called for adding more police. And they rejected the controversial police union that went hard after Johnson.

    “The narrative coming out of the first election was that voters were scared out of their wits,” said Geoff Garin, a Democratic strategist and pollster. “Now, after the last election, the story is that while voters are scared, they aren’t out of their wits.”

    Pritzker, who helped raise critical money for TV ads in Protasiewicz’s race, said the GOP tactic to paint Democrats as soft on crime was also used in the midterms, and didn’t work then in Illinois and several key battleground states, either.

    “We all got attacked on the simplistic vision of Republicans and we all are folks who believe you’ve got to address public safety in a nuanced and multifaceted fashion. We’ve said that to the voters and they responded,” Pritzker said.

    “We saw it over and over again,” he added, pointing to the 2022 Democratic victories of Govs. Tim Walz of Minnesota, Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan and Tony Evers of Wisconsin as well as his own in Illinois.

    In Pritzker’s race last year, his conservative opponent, Darren Bailey, hammered the governor over Chicago’s persistent crime problem. Pritzker said polling showed crime was “an important issue” to voters, “but that didn’t mean they wanted to choose the more conservative or Republican candidate. That bore itself out.”

    The same thing happened in Tuesday’s mayoral election in Chicago, said Pritzker, who did not endorse in the race that saw Mayor Lori Lightfoot shut out after the first round of voting. Her administration’s handling of crime was attacked by the eight candidates she faced in the first round, including Johnson and Vallas.

    Vallas, a former public schools chief, latched on to people’s fears about carjackings in neighborhoods that hadn’t experienced it to the extent they do now. He proposed ramping up police officers on the streets and talked about opening schools for alternative programming for young adults.

    Johnson, who had previously said defunding police was “a goal,” insisted during the race that he wasn’t suggesting taking funds away from police. He said he supported adding 200 detectives to solve crimes and funding social services programs that get to the heart of the crime problem.

    The attention on Chicago and its handling of crime was on the radar of the national Democratic Party, too, with Biden weighing where the 2024 Democratic convention should be held. Chicago is a finalist, as are New York and Atlanta.

    Pritzker called the Midwest “a blue wall” for Democrats, adding, “that was proven out last night. I do think that this puts us in the pole position to win the convention.”

    Some in the Chicago contingent pushing their DNC bid had worried that Vallas winning the mayor’s race would complicate their efforts given critical remarks he had made about Chicago itself and a slew of top elected leaders, including Pritzker. They were heartened by the fact that Biden and DNC officials waited until the mayor’s race was over to decide.

    For Biden, however, the greater impact is likely in Wisconsin, a state that’s central to his chances in 2024. On Wednesday, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre connected the string of Democratic wins on abortion rights since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year.

    “Americans want the freedom to make reproductive health care decisions without government interference,” Jean-Pierre said. “Yet, though, you see that Republican elected officials are more committed than ever to attack those fundamental freedoms that Americans should have.”

    Brian Stryker, a Democratic strategist who conducted polling for Protasiewicz, said the state’s 1849 abortion ban was very much top of mind for voters in Wisconsin. As were questions about whether the elected officials there would certify future contests. That Protasiewicz performed so well in suburban counties should serve as a potent signal to Democrats across the region, he said.

    Garin agreed, but went even further.

    “Wisconsin is evidence of a backlash against the MAGA power-grab and their assault on democracy and the rule of the people,” he said. “And Democrats in 2024 would be wise to tap into that.”

    [ad_2]
    #Wisconsin #Chicago #elections #expose #liabilities #GOP #case
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute: Mathura court suspends its earlier order, to hear case on April 11

    Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute: Mathura court suspends its earlier order, to hear case on April 11

    [ad_1]

    Mathura: A fast-track court here on Wednesday suspended its earlier order directing for a report from the revenue department on Shahi Masjid Idgah adjoining the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi temple here and fixed April 11 as the next date of hearing in the case.

    “Civil Judge Senior Division of Fast Track Court, Niraj Gaund, has suspended the proceedings regarding sending Amin (a revenue department official) to Shahi Masjid Idgah for carrying out measurements,” District Government Counsel Sanjai Gaur said.

    In the suit Bal Krishna and others versus Intezamia Committee and others, the fast-track court had on March 29 ordered for a report by Amin.

    MS Education Academy

    After hearing the arguments of defense counsel, the court said it would first hear the petitioner’s counsel who was not present in the court on Wednesday and fixed April 11 as the next date of hearing.

    Defense counsel Niraj Sharma presented a ruling of the Allahabad High Court and another ruling of the Supreme Court regarding giving priority for hearing on maintainability of the suit, which the court accepted.

    Bal Krishna through Hindu Sena chief Vishnu Gupta and others had filed a suit in the court of Civil Judge Senior Division (III) on December 8 last year for shifting of Shahi Masjid Idgah which they claim has been constructed on a part of 13.37 acre land of Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Krishna #JanmabhoomiShahi #Idgah #dispute #Mathura #court #suspends #earlier #order #hear #case #April

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Bragg’s case against Trump hits a wall of skepticism — even from Trump’s critics

    Bragg’s case against Trump hits a wall of skepticism — even from Trump’s critics

    [ad_1]

    “I believe President Trump’s character and conduct make him unfit for office. Even so, I believe the New York prosecutor has stretched to reach felony criminal charges in order to fit a political agenda,” said Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), who twice voted to convict Trump in impeachment trials that would have rendered him ineligible to run for president. “The prosecutor’s overreach sets a dangerous precedent for criminalizing political opponents and damages the public’s faith in our justice system.”

    “You’ve got to work hard to make President Trump a martyr,” added Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), another GOP lawmaker who has been critical of Trump. “Congratulations to Manhattan DA, Alvin Bragg, who has managed to do just that.”

    Some wondered why Bragg revived a case he had appeared to leave for dead just months ago. Others questioned the specifics — like how Bragg was able to elevate the “falsification of business records” charges against Trump into felonies, a move that requires evidence that Trump attempted to conceal a second crime. Still others focused on the delay in bringing charges — six years after the core underlying conduct — and anticipated that Trump will seek to toss the case for exceeding the statute of limitations, despite the assessment of some legal experts that the case is not time-barred.

    Bragg left those questions largely unanswered in Tuesday’s filings and public comments. When asked why he changed course and charged Trump after having reportedly expressed reservations about aspects of the investigation, Bragg declined in a press conference to offer specifics, saying only that his prosecutors had “more evidence made available to the office and the opportunity to meet with additional witnesses.”

    Legal experts who had awaited Bragg’s charging documents to resolve some of the lingering mysteries about the case remained confounded by some aspects of the prosecution.

    “It is said that if you go after the king, you should not miss,” wrote Richard Hasen, a campaign finance law expert at UCLA. “In this vein, it is very easy to see this case tossed for legal insufficiency or tied up in the courts well past the 2024 election before it might ever go to trial. It will be a circus that will embolden Trump, especially if he walks.”

    Even Ian Millhiser, the liberal legal commentator for Vox, called the legal theory on which Bragg’s case is built “dubious.”

    The dynamic underscored the extraordinary risk Bragg took in deciding to mount the first-ever criminal prosecution of a former president — particularly one who is not shy about stoking outrage at the justice system. Trump did just that in a speech at Mar-a-Lago on Tuesday night, attacking not only Bragg but also the judge who will preside over the case, Juan Merchan, and the judge’s wife.

    Two former White House officials defended the case Bragg laid out, calling it legally sound and “an important case for democracy” even as they acknowledged the mixed reviews from legal experts.

    “There are a number of important critiques of the case in the furor and they are worthy of consideration,” former Obama White House ethics adviser Norm Eisen and former Nixon-era White House legal counsel John Dean wrote in a CNN op-ed Wednesday morning. “But ultimately, they are all wrong.”

    Bragg, a Democrat who colleagues say isn’t particularly politically savvy, found himself without a large number of prominent Democratic allies Tuesday. New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and Rep. Jamaal Bowman have been vocal supporters, with both elected officials attending a rally in support of the indictment Tuesday. Bowman has also taken to cable TV to advocate for Bragg, saying he has done “an exceptional job.”

    And at times Bragg has marshaled the support of surrogates, though mainly regarding non-legal aspects of the case. After Trump called the district attorney an “animal” last month, Bragg allies such as Rev. Al Sharpton and Rep. Adriano Espaillat came to his defense to ask people to “stand with us now to stare down this unprecedented attack on the foundation of our democracy,” with Espaillat later holding a rally for him.

    But Bragg hasn’t had a backer with a megaphone the size of Trump’s, and the district attorney is relatively limited in the public remarks he can make about an ongoing case — an uneven playing field that Trump has used to his advantage.

    Others in Bragg’s position have said leaving the politics to election season is the best course of action for an elected district attorney. John Flynn, the district attorney of Erie County, New York, and the president of the National District Attorneys Association, said in a radio interview last month that “you have to separate it.”

    “Once the election is over and you take over and start the job you have to remove yourself from politics. Once you do that, you can ward off the criticism,” he told Buffalo station WBEN.

    Trump sought to highlight the fissures between his political adversaries and Bragg during his remarks at Mar-a-Lago late Tuesday, but he also appeared to damage his own cause with a fusillade aimed at Merchan — just hours after the judge warned Trump’s lawyers that their client should not made any statements that “incite violate or create civil unrest.”

    [ad_2]
    #Braggs #case #Trump #hits #wall #skepticism #Trumps #critics
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )