Tag: Case

  • Viveka murder case: CBI makes key arrest

    Viveka murder case: CBI makes key arrest

    [ad_1]

    Kadapa: Stepping up the investigation into the 2019 murder case of former Andhra Pradesh minister Y. S. Vivekananda Reddy, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Friday made a key arrest.

    The Special Investigation Team (SIT) of the CBI arrested G. Uday Kumar Reddy at Pulivendula in Kadapa district. He is said to be a close follower of Kadapa MP Y. S. Avinash Reddy, the nephew of the deceased, who has been questioned by the agency multiple times in recent months.

    The CBI team arrested Uday after issuing him a notice under section 41 A of the Criminal Procedure Code. He was earlier questioned by the CBI in the past.

    MS Education Academy

    The investigation agency was shifting Uday to Hyderabad, where a CBI court is hearing the case since November last year following direction of the Supreme Court.

    The development has come a couple of weeks after the Supreme Court constituted a new Special Investigation Team (SIT) of the CBI and directed it to complete the investigation by April 30.

    Uday, said to be an employee of Uranium mine at Tummalapalli in Kadapa district, had filed a private case against CBI S.P. Ram Singh in Kadapa Court last year. On the court’s direction, police had booked against Ram Singh in February last year following a complaint by Uday that the officer coerced him to give false testimony in the murder case. However, Andhra Pradesh High Court later stayed the case against the CBI SP.

    On the day when Vivekananda Reddy was murdered at his residence, Uday had allegedly gone there along with Avinash Reddy and Shiva Shankar.

    Uday was allegedly present at the residence of Y. S. Bhaskar Reddy, brother of the deceased and father of Avinash Reddy.

    Vivekananda Reddy, brother of former chief minister Y. S. Rajasekhara Reddy and uncle of present Andhra Pradesh chief minister Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, was found murdered at his residence in Pulivendula of Kadapa district on the night of March 15, 2019, a few days before the elections.

    The 68-year-old former state minister and former MP was alone at his house when unidentified persons barged in and killed him.

    The CBI took over the investigation into the case in 2020 on the direction of Andhra Pradesh High Court while hearing a petition of Vivekananda Reddy’s daughter Suneetha Reddy, who raised suspicion about some relatives.

    The Supreme Court transferred the case to Hyderabad in November last year while observing that doubts raised by Suneetha Reddy about getting a fair trial and investigation in Andhra Pradesh were reasonable.

    Deceased’s brother Bhaskar Reddy and the latter’s son Avinash Reddy are facing allegations for their involvement in the murder. Avinash, cousin of the chief minister, has denied the allegations.

    [ad_2]
    #Viveka #murder #case #CBI #key #arrest

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Woman hit-drag case: Accused’s identity proved through CCTV footage

    Woman hit-drag case: Accused’s identity proved through CCTV footage

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The identity of four accused in the hit-and-run case where a 20-year-old woman was dragged to death while trapped under a car here on new year’s day was established based on CCTV footage, statements of witnesses and other scientific evidence, the Delhi Police said in its charge sheet.

    According to the final report, the evidence proved the presence of the four accused — Amit Khanna, Krishan, Manoj Mittal and Mithun — in the car.

    The charge sheet cited the statements of six eyewitnesses, including the victim’s friend, the person who informed police about the body, an autorickshaw driver, and a person who was in the car with the four accused but was dropped at Sultanpuri before the incident.

    MS Education Academy

    It said the CCTV footage revealed crucial evidence, such as the presence of all the accused at a dhaba before the incident and in Rohini Sector 1 after.

    “It has also been revealed by the footage that the accused knew that the victim was entangled… The accused didn’t try to save the life of the woman. After getting back in the car, they intentionally dragged her for a long distance to kill her,” the charge sheet claimed.

    It stated that the DNA profile generated from the strands of hairs recovered from the car matched with the profile generated from the blood samples of Khanna, Mittal and Krishan.

    Also, the DNA profile generated from the blood spots present on the clothes of the accused matched with that generated from the blood sample of the victim, the charge sheet stated.

    DNA profiles generated from the exhibits recovered from the spot along with those lifted from the car, the cloth of the victim and from the clothes of Manoj Mittal, Mithun and Krishan were found similar to the DNA profile generated from the blood on gauze, the charge sheet said.

    “A forensic science laboratory team lifted the blood in gauze from the offending car and the spot where the body of the deceased was found. DNA profile thus prepared matched with the DNA profile prepared from the blood in gauze preserved during the post-mortem of the deceased,” the charge sheet said.

    The report said that the owner of the vehicle, Ashutosh Bhardwaj, voluntarily permitted his car to be driven by Amit Khanna, who did not have a valid driving licence. Also, Khanna’s blood test revealed the presence of alcohol above the permissible limit, it said.

    “During the interrogation, Ashutosh disclosed that when he came to know about the incident and that the person driving the car did not possess a valid driving licence, he, Ankush and other accused planned to plant another person possessing a valid driving licence as the driver of the offending car at the time of the incident,” the charge sheet said.

    “Ashutosh helped in the disappearance of the evidence of offence and gave false information to shield the accused,” it said.

    Police arrested Deepak Khanna (26), Amit Khanna (25), Krishan (27), Mithun (26), and Manoj Mittal in the case on January 2.

    Co-accused Ashutosh Bhardwaj and Ankush, were earlier given bail by the court, while the bail plea of Deepak Khanna was rejected by a sessions court.

    Amit Khanna, Krishan, Mithun and Manoj Mittal have been accused of murder, while Amit Khanna and Ashutosh were booked under the Motor Vehicles Act.

    It said all the accused were booked for the offences of criminal conspiracy, destruction of evidence, harbouring offender, common intention and false information with an intent to cause a public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person.

    Delhi Police has levelled additional charges against Amit Khanna for the offences of rash driving and causing hurt by an act endangering the life or personal safety of others.

    [ad_2]
    #Woman #hitdrag #case #Accuseds #identity #proved #CCTV #footage

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Judges Are Like Architectural Designers While Deciding A Case: Chief Justice

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: The Jammu and Kashmir Judicial Academy organized a one-day interactive program on “order/judgment writing, application of the law, sharing best practices, and finding solutions to practical problems faced by them in justice delivery” for Civil Judges (Junior Division) of Kashmir Province. The program was inaugurated by Chief Justice, High Court of J&K and Ladakh, and Patron-in-Chief, J&K Judicial Academy, Justice N Kotiswar Singh. The program aims to provide a platform for Civil Judges to exchange ideas and share experiences as well as learn techniques from experts in the field of law.

    Yash Paul Bourney, Registrar Vigilance, High Court of J&K and Ladakh, M K Sharma, Director, J&K Judicial Academy, and Jatinder Singh Jamwal, Special Judge, Anti-Corruption (CBI Cases), Srinagar, were the resource persons for the program.

    Delivering the inaugural address, the Chief Justice stated that it is the primary duty of a Judge to write a judgment understandable by a litigant and not for the higher courts. All focus must be on the litigant who has come for justice, he said, adding that judgment should be clear, lucid, and with good reasoning. He said the application of mind is important to make any decision because we are dealing with human sufferings. For a good judgment, the facts of the case should be properly marshaled, and the law should be applied with clear reasons for accepting or rejecting any claim of the litigant, he asserted.

    The Chief Justice emphasized that judges are like architectural designers while deciding a case. Though in criminal cases, the charge-sheet is the basis for decision, the facts of the case must be taken care of while deciding the case, he added.

    Justice Sindhu Sharma, Chairperson, J&K Judicial Academy, in her special address, while quoting a Greek Philosopher, said that the qualities of a judge are to hear courteously, to answer wisely, to consider soberly, and to decide impartially. She emphasized that while deciding a case and writing a judgment, a judge must consider the arguments and claims put forth by the parties. Further quoting Justice H.K. Sema, a former judge of the Supreme Court of India, she said that the judgment is best when given with reasons. While quoting Justice R.C. Lahoti, former Chief Justice of India, she said that while writing a judgment, don’t go into the verbosity of the document.

    She also deliberated that a litigant must understand why a case is in his favor or against, that should come out from the judgment. The basic factors that should be considered are to maintain integrity while passing a decision, and it should not be influenced by any other matter, including our own prejudices and biases. We have to consider the facts while writing a judgment, that it should be based on the provision of law, the aspect on which we are doing, and how we are going to write the judgment.

    Justice Javed Iqbal Wani, Member, J&K Judicial Academy, in his special address, citing the case of Barender Kumar Gosh, said that the trial Judge quoted from the sonnet ‘On His Blindness’ of a famous English poet John Milton, i.e., “They also serve who only stand and wait,” while turning the plea of innocence of Barender Kumar Gosh in a robbery and murder case, quoting that even if you were a guard at the door, you were still guilty of the crime for taking no action.

    Justice Wani, citing another recent judgement of the Supreme Court of India, said, while quoting Justice Roslyn Atkinson, a former judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland, that there are various purposes for any judgement that is written, such as spelling out the judge’s own thoughts, explaining the decision to the parties, communicating the reasons for the decision to the public, and providing reasons for an appeal to consider. He added that every judgement has to have various basic elements, such as a statement of material (relevant) facts, legal issues or questions, deliberation to reach a decision, and the ratio or conclusive decision.

    Director of J&K Judicial Academy, M.K. Sharma, in his welcome address, underscored the importance of organizing this program. He said that writing judgments and orders is virtually an art and often varies from judge to judge as no form or format has been provided in law as to how judgments and orders should be written by the judges.

    The day-long interactive program was divided into two technical sessions and an interactive session for feedback.

    The first technical session was chaired by Yash Paul Bourney, Registrar Vigilance, and M.K. Sharma, Director of J&K Judicial Academy, who analyzed the art of order/judgment writing and application of the law.

    The second technical session was chaired by Jatinder Singh Jamwal, Special Judge, Anti-Corruption (CBI Cases), who shared best practices and finding solutions to practical problems faced by Civil Judges (Junior Division) in justice delivery.

    The interactive program concluded with a session during which the participants deliberated and discussed various aspects of the subject topic and raised queries that were satisfactorily settled by the resource persons. (KNO)

    [ad_2]
    #Judges #Architectural #Designers #Deciding #Case #Chief #Justice

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Court seeks ED’s response to Satyendar Jain’s case transfer plea

    Court seeks ED’s response to Satyendar Jain’s case transfer plea

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A Delhi court on Thursday sought the Enforcement Directorate (ED)’s response to an application moved by jailed Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Satyender Jain seeking transfer of a money laundering case to another judge.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Vinay Kumar Gupta issued notice to the ED on Jain’s plea, returnable by May 4, the next date of hearing in the matter.

    The court, however, refused to stay the proceedings before Special Judge Vikas Dhull, who is currently hearing the case, during the pendency of the application.

    MS Education Academy

    Jain on Tuesday sought transfer of two cases related to alleged corruption and money laundering brought against him by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the ED to another judge.

    Both the cases are currently being heard by Special Judge Dhull.

    The proceedings in the CBI corruption case have been temporarily halted by the District Judge until May 4, when arguments on Jain’s transfer application will be heard.

    Jain was placed under arrest on May 30, 2022, by the central agency under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

    The ED had initiated a money laundering investigation on the basis of the FIR registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation in 2017 under Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the PC Act, 1988 against Jain, his wife Poonam Jain, and Ajit Prasad Jain, Sunil Kumar Jain, Vaibhav Jain, and Ankush Jain.

    The CBI has alleged that Jain, while holding the office as a Minister in the Delhi government during February 14, 2015 to May 31, 2017, had acquired assets disproportionate to his known sources of income.

    A charge sheet was filed by the CBI on December 3, 2018, against Jain, his wife Poonam Jain, and other accused.

    Earlier, the ED had provisionally attached immovable properties worth Rs 4.81 crore belonging to companies beneficially owned and controlled by Jain on March 31, 2022.

    [ad_2]
    #Court #seeks #EDs #response #Satyendar #Jains #case #transfer #plea

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Advocate gets bail in rape case in absence of ‘scientific evidence’

    Advocate gets bail in rape case in absence of ‘scientific evidence’

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: A Delhi court has granted bail to an advocate who was accused of raping a woman advocate after noting that there was no scientific evidence, and the police did not seek custodial remand.

    The court granted relief to the accused Jitender Kumar Gupta a.k.a. Sumit, against whom a female advocate lodged an FIR of rape at Bara Hindu Rao Police Station.

    Deepak Shama, the counsel appearing for the accused, contended that the accused was falsely implicated in the present case.

    MS Education Academy

    “Applicant-accused and the prosecutrix both are practicing Advocates. The prosecutrix and the accused-applicant have been known to each other since 2019 and were in relation till October 2022. Prosecutrix is well known to the family of the accused,” Sharma argued.

    He further argued that the prosecutrix has made false complaint with the police regarding the accused that he was her husband and was missing.

    Sharma said that she only wanted to pressurise him to marry her despite the fact that he had got married with someone else.

    “My client had filed a representation before DCP, Civil Lines, Delhi and thereafter, the prosecutrix lodged the FIR. There is no complaint against my client from 2019 to March, 2023. There is no scientific evidence in respect of termination of her pregnancy,” he said.

    The court also noted that the police did not seek the custodial remand of the accused.

    “The accused deserves benefit of Section 438 CrPC. Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused Jitender Kumar Gupta a.k.a. Sumit, he shall be released on bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs 25,000 with one surety in the like amount. Accused shall join the investigation as and when required by the police and he shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case,” the court noted while granting relief.

    [ad_2]
    #Advocate #bail #rape #case #absence #scientific #evidence

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Madras HC grants bail to Jubin Baby, wife in Villupuram case

    Madras HC grants bail to Jubin Baby, wife in Villupuram case

    [ad_1]

    Chennai: The Madras High Court on Thursday granted bail to Jubin Baby and his wife Mariam in the Anbu Jothi ashram case of Villupuram district.

    The couple was charged with running an illegal and unrecognised home for mentally challenged persons, and using the inmates for human trafficking and organ trade.

    Justice A.D. Jagdish Chandra of the Madras High Court said, “The petitioners had been doing service to the society for the past two decades without any blemish. We’re now facing the ordeal of mere suspicion of their involvement in grave charges.”

    MS Education Academy

    He also said that the police were unable to come up with any concrete evidence in the matter even after two months.

    The court also said that the petitioners were arrested and jailed on February 15, and even while they were in judicial custody, the police or the CB-CID had not been able to collect any solid evidence to prove the charges.

    Justice Chandra observed that the personal liberty granted by the Constitution and reiterated by the Supreme Court on multiple occasions could not be denied to the petitioners based on suspicions.

    He then directed the petitioners to stay in Chennai and appear before the CB-CID Metro wing daily till further orders.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Madras #grants #bail #Jubin #Baby #wife #Villupuram #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Will file criminal defamation case against ED officials: AAP MP Sanjay Singh

    Will file criminal defamation case against ED officials: AAP MP Sanjay Singh

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh on Thursday said he will file a criminal defamation case against the Enforcement Directorate (ED) officials for “falsely” naming him in their excise policy case chargesheet.

    Addressing a press conference here, Singh alleged that the ED is “involved in making false cases without any facts or evidence”.

    Responding to the Singh’s allegations, Delhi BJP chief Virendra Sachdeva said it seems that the fear of arrest is haunting the AAP MP with each passing day.

    MS Education Academy

    The AAP leader also invited those who have been victimised by the agency to come forward and inform him.

    “As the Privileges Committee of Parliament has asked me to expose how the ED is fabricating false cases, I will bring your case and information before the Privileges Committee. It’s time to hold the ED accountable for their abuse of power and false accusations,” he added.

    Singh accused ED of targeting him after he raised his voice against the agency’s actions in the Parliament. He said he had given a speech on ED-CBI in the Parliament on December 12 last year, and his name appeared in ED’s chargesheet on January 6 this year.

    “I will file a criminal defamation case against ED director S K Mishra, officer Bhanu Priya who signed the chargesheet, and IO Joginder Singh,” he said.

    The AAP leader also alleged that he had sought an appointment with ED 11 times to give information on the Adani issue. However, the facts and documents were received by the ED after two months.

    Reading out the contents of the chargesheet, Singh said it claimed that on October 1, 2022, Dinesh Arora had told the ED that the transfer of a liquor shop of Amit Arora was done by Manish Sisodia on the direction of Sanjay Singh.

    Singh alleged that the “ED created a false chargesheet by creating a fake case, simply because he was speaking out against Modi-Adani corruption”.

    Singh presented Arora’s statement, which ED had recorded on October 1, 2022 which mentions that Excise Commissioner Rahul Singh transferred Amit Arora’s shop in a routine manner. There was no mention of Sanjay Singh’s name even remotely in Arora’s statement recorded by the ED, he claimed.

    Singh also presented Dinesh Arora’s statement to the court under section 164, which states that when Amit Arora insisted that Dinesh Arora bring up the matter of his shop’s transfer, neither did Dinesh Arora talk to the then Deputy CM nor to Sanjay Singh.

    “The ED’s attempt to implicate me in a fabricated case is nothing but a political move to suppress my voice against the Adani row. It is evident that the ED is creating a false case to fulfil its own agenda. I won’t be silenced by their baseless accusations and intimidation tactics,” he said.

    Meanwhile, Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva said it seems that the fear of arrest is haunting MP Sanjay Singh with each passing day as he is realising that summons of ED may strike his door any day now.

    Sachdeva claimed that Singh was speaking in favour of liquor baron Dinesh Arora because he knows that Arora’s evidence will not only nail Manish Sisodia but also him (Singh) and sooner or later Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal too.

    [ad_2]
    #file #criminal #defamation #case #officials #AAP #Sanjay #Singh

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • ‘Orwellian state being created..’: Cong on ED case against BBC

    ‘Orwellian state being created..’: Cong on ED case against BBC

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Congress on Thursday slammed the Centre after the Enforcement Directorate registered a case against news broadcaster BBC India, alleging that the government is determined to impose a “dictatorial government” where there is “tyranny of the executive.”

    The ED has registered a FEMA case against BBC India with allegations of foreign exchange violations, official sources said Thursday, two months after the Income-Tax department surveyed its office premises.

    A deputy managing editor of the news company has deposed before the agency.

    MS Education Academy

    The ED has called for documents and the recording of statements of some company executives under provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), the officials said. The probe is essentially looking at purported foreign direct investment (FDI) violations by the company, they said.

    Asked about the development at a press conference at AICC headquarters, Congress spokesperson Anshul Avijit said, “We know the atmosphere that is being created by the Orwellian sort of state here where the freedom of expression and press has completely been clamped down.”

    “It is not new, it has been happening, there are changes in laws but far from that there are threats and intimidation so whoever dares criticise this government is actually thrown in jail,” Avijit said.

    He also spoke about the incident where students of Delhi University were suspended for showing a recent BBC documentary on 2002 Gujarat riots.

    “This is the kind of state we live in. I really fear the freedom of the press as well. The new IT laws that have come out, they have come under much criticism but nothing deters this government.

    “They are determined to impose a dictatorial government in which the executive rules, so you have the tyranny of the executive,” the Congress leader said.

    On February 14 this year, the I-T department conducted survey operations at the London-headquartered broadcaster’s offices in Delhi and Mumbai as part of an investigation into alleged tax evasion. The survey went on for three days.

    The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the administrative body for the I-T department, had then said the income and profits shown by various BBC group entities were “not commensurate” with the scale of their operations in India and they failed to pay on certain remittances by its foreign entities.

    The BBC, after the tax survey, had said they will “continue to cooperate with the authorities and hope matters are resolved as soon as possible.”

    The action had led to a sharp political debate with the ruling BJP accusing the BBC of “venomous reporting” while the Opposition questioned the timing — weeks after the broadcaster aired a two-part documentary ‘India: The Modi Question.’

    [ad_2]
    #Orwellian #state #created. #Cong #case #BBC

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • ED files FEMA case against BBC India

    ED files FEMA case against BBC India

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate has registered a FEMA case against news broadcaster BBC India for foreign exchange violations, official sources said Thursday.

    The federal probe agency has also called for documents and the recording of statements of some company executives under provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), they said.

    The probe is essentially looking at purported foreign direct investment (FDI) violations by the company, they said.

    MS Education Academy

    The moves comes in the backdrop of the Income-Tax department surveying BBC office premises in Delhi in February.

    The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the administrative body for the I-T department, had then said the income and profits shown by various BBC group entities were “not commensurate” with the scale of their operations in India and tax has not been paid on certain remittances by its foreign entities.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News



    [ad_2]
    #files #FEMA #case #againstBBCIndia

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • India reports more than 10,000 new Covid 19 case

    India reports more than 10,000 new Covid 19 case

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: India recorded a single-day rise of 10,158 coronavirus cases, highest in nearly eight months, according to the Union Health Ministry data.

    The number of active cases has increased to 44,998, the data updated on Thursday showed.

    India had reported 7,830 coronavirus infections on Wednesday.

    MS Education Academy

    The daily positivity rate was recorded at 4.42 per cent while the weekly positivity rate was 4.02 per cent. The active cases now constitute 0.10 per cent of the total infections.

    The nationwide COVID-19 recovery rate has been recorded at 98.71 per cent,according to the health ministry website. The case fatality rate was recorded at 1.19 per cent.

    The number of people who have recuperated from the disease rose to 4,42,10,127.

    According to the ministry’s website, 220.66 crore doses of Covid vaccine have been administered in the country.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #India #reports #Covid #case

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )