Price: [price_with_discount] (as of [price_update_date] – Details)
[ad_1] Great fun motor, will work with many power sources batteries and solar cells work perfectly Easy to install and disassemble, suitable for many projects at home and in your classroom. Great for robot toy, student lab project, STEM class, motor powered cars, engineering class and more Tips: Mini size, easy to install and save, put them in a sealed bag when not in use to prevent damp rust Note: Small parts, keep them far away from children under 3 years to avoid choking Package includes:5 pack little 3v dc motor, perfect for mini fan, kids school project, electric toy cars and science experiments etc Testing voltage: 3V-6V-9V.Rated voltage: DC 0-6V. Rated current: 0.6A. Power rating: 1.2W. Package content: 10 × motors. KEEP AWAY FROM CHILDERN IN CASE OF AN ACCIDENT, PLEASE! They can be used for DIY toys, mini USB fans, appliances and science Experiments and so on.
For some scientists, they are the inevitable next stage of staving off the existential threat of climate chaos. For others, they should not even be talked about.
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies, which provide a means of sucking carbon out of the atmosphere, are one of the hottest areas of climate research, but also the most controversial.
The debate over whether and how to develop CDR has been ignited by the release last month of the final section of the comprehensive review of climate science by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The report found that ways of capturing and storing carbon dioxide, though expensive, might play a role in trying to keep global temperatures within safe bounds.
But scientists and policymakers are divided. Some say the technology must be the immediate priority for research. Others urge caution, and warn against putting faith in untested technology before we have even fully deployed the reliable low-carbon technologies, such as renewable energy, that we already have.
David King is working with Cambridge University’s department of engineering to try to find ways of refreezing the Arctic Photograph: NurPhoto/Getty Images
John Kerry, the US special presidential envoy for climate, talked of his concerns. “Some scientists suggest that it’s possible there could be an overshoot [of global temperatures, beyond the limit of 1.5C above pre-industrial levels that governments are targeting] and you could clawback, so to speak; you have technologies and other things that allow you to come back.
“The danger with that, which alarms me the most and motivates me the most, is that according to the science, and the best scientists in the world, we may be at or past several tipping points that they have been warning us about for some time,” he said. “That’s the danger, the irreversibility.”
The former UK government chief scientific adviser Sir David King strenuously disagrees. He believes CDR of many kinds will be needed, along with the means to “repair” the climate, such as by refreezing the ice caps, because the world is almost certain to overshoot the global target limit of 1.5C above pre-industrial levels.
“We are already at 1.35C above pre-industrial levels today,” he said. “We are already experiencing massive warming in the Arctic, where it’s more than 3C above the pre-industrial average.”
A rash of new technology startups bears witness to the potential business opportunity that many companies and investors see in CDR. These fledgling companies are exploring everything from “scrubbers” that chemically remove carbon dioxide from the air, to “biochar”, which creates fertiliser from burning wood waste without oxygen, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) by which carbon dioxide is liquefied and pumped into underground geological formations. They have taken the IPCC report as a spur to investment, and a stamp of approval.
“Growing carbon removal to be in line with the IPCC requires a massive scale-up in the next decade. Startups are meeting this climate challenge by developing a suite of approaches that can make a gigaton impact,” said Tania Timmermann, the chief technology officer of Andes, a company that plans to use micro-organisms to sequester carbon in soil.
Ben Rubin, the executive director of the Carbon Business Council, which represents several CDR specialists, said: “The IPCC report makes clear that the window of opportunity is closing quickly, highlighting the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing emissions is crucial but not enough: the report affirms that gigatonnes of carbon removal are required to help restore the climate,” he said. “Innovators are actively working to meet this climate challenge, by finding cost-effective and responsible ways to deploy carbon removal.”
But the key section of the IPCC report, which ignited the controversy, was fiercely fought over by scientists and governments up until the last moments before the document was finalised. The handful of mentions of CDR in the final 36-page summary for policymakers – which distils the key messages and is compiled by scientists alongside government representatives from any UN member that wants to take part – were only inserted after hours of desperate wrangling.
Saudi Arabia and other oil-producing countries were most insistent that CDR and CCS should be included and emphasised. In the end, nine references to CDR were left in the summary, and several more to CCS.
“Saudi Arabia brought 10 very experienced negotiators,” said one person. “They tried to take out references to renewable energy and tried to insist that references to carbon capture should be in there instead of, or at least as well as, renewables.”
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
A CCS facility in Alberta, Canada. Photograph: Todd Korol/Reuters
But many scientists, campaigners and green experts are unhappy with the references. They fear that giving the impression there are viable options for removing carbon dioxide might engender a false sense of security. Most CDR technologies are unproven, are likely to be limited in scope, take years to develop and will cost large amounts of money.
Lili Fuhr, the director of the climate and energy programme at the Center for International Environmental Law, said: “We need to challenge the idea that we have to do less now, because we can do more later, with technofixes. This is a dangerous idea.”
Friederike Otto, a lead author of the IPCC, and senior lecturer at the Grantham Institute at Imperial College London, said: “My feeling about CDR is that we should pretend it is not an option. We should act as if CDR will never be achievable. We do not have a technology at the moment that works at scale … so we should make our policies as if CDR is not an option.”
She said pursuing CDR could be a dangerous distraction, and questioned whether it was a good idea to spend money on technologies that offered highly uncertain future benefits, when viable ways of reducing emissions now were not being deployed fast enough. “CDR has already been used as an excuse to dither and delay,” she said.
Otto said: “It’s very important to highlight that we still can keep to 1.5C – we have the knowledge and the tools to do it. But what we do not have is a sense of urgency and political will.”
King acknowledges that some scientists have concerns about CDR, but he believes it is needed because of the failure to act before now. “[Those who object] are taking the exact position I took in 2015, when I was leading global negotiations for the UK,” he said. “But there is no time for messing about now.”
King, who is working with Cambridge University’s department of engineering to try to find ways of refreezing the Arctic, points out that the IPCC report found only a narrow opportunity for the world to limit heating to 1.5C, that relies on massive reductions in greenhouse gases in the next few years, which is unlikely to happen.
“The IPCC does not go nearly far enough on CDR,” he said. “I believe it is more than likely we will hit 1.5C by the end of the decade. It’s false thinking, that the IPCC is saying we can manage [to stay below that level] with reducing emissions. The carbon we have put up [in the atmosphere] will have to be removed. It may cost a fortune, but we have to recognise that the alternative is to lose our civilisation.”
[ad_2]
#Carbon #dioxide #removal #tech #polarising #climate #science
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )
Relying on technology to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is “dangerous” and a cause for “alarm”, John Kerry has warned.
The US special presidential envoy for climate said in an interview that new technologies may not prevent the world from passing “tipping points”, key temperature thresholds that, once passed, could trigger a cascade of unstoppable physical effects.
“Some scientists suggest that it’s possible there could be an overshoot [of global temperatures, beyond the limit of 1.5C above pre-industrial levels that governments are targeting] and you could clawback, so to speak – you have technologies and other things that allow you to come back,” Kerry told the Guardian.
“The danger with that, which alarms me the most and motivates me the most, is that according to the science, and the best scientists in the world, we may be at or past several tipping points that they have been warning us about for some time,” he said. “That’s the danger, the irreversibility.”
He called on governments to deploy renewable energy faster, along with related technologies such as electric vehicles. These are already available for widespread deployment, and could prevent the world from reaching the high levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that would cause temperatures to breach the 1.5C threshold.
“Part of the challenge we face right now is countries that have technologies available to them are not necessarily deploying them at the rate that they should be,” he said. “Fatih Birol [executive director of the International Energy Agency] has made it very clear for some time that all you need to meet the 2030 goal of 45% reduction [in greenhouse gas emissions] globally is to deploy renewables in the current state of technology, and that’s not happening.”
“There’s a resistance right now that I see from several quarters to doing what we know we need to do,” Kerry said. “I think there are things that are really quite simple that we could be doing, but it requires political will, it requires resources, allocation and a determination to get the job done.”
He pointed to the Inflation Reduction Act, the $369bn (£296bn) push by the US to invest in renewable energy and low-carbon technologies. EU governments have protested at aspects of the legislation, such as tax breaks for green companies to set up in the US, which they see as protectionist and a potential competitive threat.
Kerry countered that the US measures were good for all countries. “If we accelerate the pace of discovery, then the world benefits. This is not a US-centric thing,” he said. “If we can advance those technologies very rapidly, then we’re sworn to share them, and help people to develop similarly. That’s the way collectively we try to meet the challenge.”
He said the act, passed last summer, was already making an impact. “People are shifting and realising the best thing to do. There are a number of countries in Europe – Germany, and France, and others – that are hell-bent to do a similar kind of effort. They try to define it for themselves and go out and do it,” he said. “Given the trillions we need to be deploying to meet this challenge, to have something that excites investment is in everybody’s interest. We are seeing a tremendous amount of venture capital moving in the direction of some of these transition essentials.”
The UK must also pile efforts into net zero, he added. “Everybody in the world [needs a net zero strategy],” he said. “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change made it crystal clear that we’re not on the track we need to be … everything needs to be increased exponentially in effort.”
The US president, Joe Biden, has come under severe criticism from climate activists, despite his green investment push, for pressing ahead with investment in fossil fuels.
In recent weeks, he approved an area of the Gulf of Mexico amounting to about 73m acres, roughly the size of Italy, for drilling for oil and gas wells. A fortnight before that, he approved the Willow project, a drilling site in Alaska that is expected to produce 600m barrels of oil over its lifetime. Further licences are also possible, and the US is looking to expand its shale gas production and export to Europe under Biden’s watch.
Kerry robustly defended these actions, on the grounds that more fossil fuels were needed temporarily because of the war in Ukraine, and said some oil and gas expansion could occur within climate limits, particularly if carbon capture and storage, or other ways of reducing the impact of the fossil fuels, could be used.
“Gas usage is an automatic 30-50% reduction over oil and coal. It’s not clean, it’s cleaner,” he said. “So now the question is, can carbon capture and storage be deployed at a scale that makes it possible to meet our goals?”
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
The expansion of drilling would “not have a deep impact. I’m not saying it’s impactless completely, but it’s not going to have a significant impact.” The US was still committed to its climate targets, of a 50-52% reduction in emissions by 2030, compared with 2005 levels, he added.
Kerry also pointed to the turmoil around the world, and high energy prices, caused by Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. “We needed desperately to not allow Putin to make his gas cutoff a weapon. And because of Ukraine, and the urgency of calming the marketplace, making sure that economies are not suddenly crashing because prices are going so high that people can’t afford to live, you’ve got to have some supply. It’s transition. That’s why the goal was 2030 and then it’s 2050. It’s not tomorrow.”
He conceded that the expansion of fossil fuels in the US was difficult to explain to other countries, however. “It obviously has challenges of perception or messaging,” he said. “There’s a danger that somebody distorts it, and says ‘they did it, therefore we can do it’. That’s why I say you’ve got to understand it, you’ve got to put it in a real context of what it really means and what the impact of this is going to be.”
But he insisted that the US would still meet its climate targets. “President Biden has reiterated a full-fledged commitment to keep our target, we’re not moving on our target,” he said. “This one thing is not an aberration in terms of us walking back on our goals, or walking back on our expectations. I feel very confident about that.”
The appointment of Sultan Al Jaber as president of the next UN climate summit, Cop28, in the United Arab Emirates in November, has been condemned by activists who say his role as chief of the UAE national oil company Adnoc creates a conflict of interest.
Kerry defended Jaber, insisting that his background – which Jaber told the Guardian would help him bring a business focus to the role – would be an advantage. “Personally, I think that because he has an experience within the context of oil and gas production, and a leadership in that, he has the ability to pull some missing links to the table with respect to what we have to get done. I’m hopeful about that,” Kerry said.
Kerry also called for more private sector funding for climate finance, to help poor countries cut their emissions and cope with the impacts of extreme weather. “Climate finance is not just a challenge, it is the biggest single challenge right now,” he said. “Finance, and I mean big finance in the trillions of dollars. That requires a mobilisation of capital, using incentives and working with the private sector to bring them to the table, to create bankable projects that will excite deployment of capital.”
[ad_2]
#John #Kerry #relying #technology #remove #carbon #dioxide #dangerous
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )
The people, who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to share details about the rulemakings, said EPA had not provided details about the upcoming proposals, though both people said they expected that the regulations would represent progress in combating climate change. CNN reported earlier Friday that the rules would be more stringent than previously planned regulations.
The EPA had said in January that it expected to issue the rule sometime in April and to issue a final rule in spring 2024. That timeline pushes the agency’s action dangerously close to the 2024 election, after which a Republican president or Congress could seek to undo it.
The agency is expected to crack down harder on existing natural gas generators than initially anticipated, according to one of the people. The other person said EPA must pair the proposal with environmental and health assurances for communities where power plants are sited, noting that questions about how well new technologies like carbon capture — a potential remedy likely to be included in the proposal — will work.
The power plant push follows other recent moves by the Biden administration to curb carbon emissions. Last week, EPA floated tougher auto emissions rules that would effectively ensure that nearly two-thirds of passenger vehicles sales are electric or otherwise zero-carbon by 2032.
On Friday, President Joe Biden issued an executive order tightening environmental reviews for projects in pollution-ravaged communities.
But environmental activists have also lamented recent administration decisions that benefit the oil and gas industry, which they say undermine Biden’s pledges to push the country off fossil fuels. Those decisions include the Interior Department approval of the Willow oil project in March and last week’s green light to a liquefied natural gas export facility, both of which are in Alaska.
Natural gas, which has half the carbon intensity of coal, provides the nation’s largest source of power, about 40 percent of the existing electricity output.
The Biden administration has set a target for 80 percent of U.S. power to come from sources that emit no greenhouse gases by 2030, and for the power grid to be completely free of emissions by 2035. That is part of an effort to keep global temperatures from surpassing 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, a threshold that scientists say heralds widespread irreversible climate damage.
The proposal, Reg. 2060-AV09, will address both existing and future fossil fuel power plants. One of the people familiar with the administration’s thinking said it is expected to be highly nuanced.
Its release would come less than a year after the Supreme Court ruled that EPA’s regulatory authority does not allow it to require utilities to shift some electricity production from coal to cleaner-burning gas or carbon-free sources like solar or wind. That strategy, known as generation shifting, was the cornerstone of a major Obama-era regulation known as the Clean Power Plan.
The high court ruling did not address the exact limits of EPA’s authority, leaving the agency to try again. Without generation shifting, the likeliest method for reducing emissions is requiring some level of carbon capture and storage, a technology that companies are investing billions of dollars to develop but whose effectiveness remains unproven.
EPA is also expected to strengthen standards for newly built natural gas plants. The Obama administration had set a limit achievable by current technologies, although the agency has recently considered methods for reducing that limit further. Utilities plan to build 7.5 gigawatts of new natural gas capacity in 2023, according to the Energy Information Administration, around 14 percent of all new capacity additions expected this year.
The Obama EPA also set emissions limits for newly built coal-fired power plants that require at least part of the carbon to be captured and stored. That rule is still in place, although no new coal plants are expected to be built in the U.S., even absent emissions limits.
The forthcoming rule must also repeal the Trump administration’s power plant regulation, the Affordable Clean Energy rule, which initially was struck down by a federal court but technically went back on the books after the Supreme Court’s ruling last year. That rule required coal plants to consider installing efficiency upgrades that would have achieved little to no overall emissions reductions on their own.
The Biden EPA rule is still under review at the White House, according to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, which indicates it has at least one more meeting scheduled regarding the rule on Monday with a coalition of major environmental groups.
[ad_2]
#EPA #set #major #source #carbon #pollution
( With inputs from : www.politico.com )
The Group of Seven richest countries set higher 2030 targets for generating renewable energy, amid an energy crisis provoked by Russia’s war on Ukraine, but they set no deadline to phase out coal-fired power plants.
At a meeting hosted by Japan, ministers from Japan, the U.S., Canada, Italy, France, Germany and the U.K. reaffirmed their commitment to reach zero carbon emissions by the middle of the century, and said they aimed to collectively increase solar power capacity by 1 terawatt and offshore wind by 150 gigawatts by the end of this decade.
“The G7 contributes to expanding renewable energy globally and bringing down costs by strengthening capacity including through a collective increase in offshore wind capacity … and a collective increase of solar …,” the energy and environment ministers said in a 36-page communiqué issued after the two-day meeting.
“In the midst of an unprecedented energy crisis, it’s important to come up with measures to tackle climate change and promote energy security at the same time,” Japanese industry minister Yasutoshi Nishimura told a news conference, according to Reuters.
The ministers’ statement also condemned Russia’s “illegal, unjustifiable, and unprovoked” invasion of Ukraine and its “devastating” impact on the environment. The ministers vowed to support a green recovery and reconstruction in Ukraine.
They also published a five-point plan for securing access to critical raw materials that will be crucial for the green transition.
Before the meeting, Japan was facing criticism from green groups over its push to keep the door open to continued investments in natural gas, a fossil fuel. The final agreed text said such investments “can be appropriate” to deal with the crisis if they are consistent with climate objectives.
The ministers’ meeting in the northern city of Sapporo comes just over a month before a G7 leaders’ summit in Hiroshima.
[ad_2]
#vows #effort #renewables #sets #coal #phaseout #deadline
( With inputs from : www.politico.eu )
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court (HC) has slammed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) Director General (DG), V. Vidyavathi for her failure to file a reply, giving an opinion as to whether a safe evaluation of the age of the Shivling-like structure, purportedly found inside the Gyanvapi mosque complex in Varanasi in May last year, can be done or not.
Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra was hearing a revision petition filed by Laxmi Devi and three others, who challenged the Varanasi court’s order of October 14, 2022.
They had sought a HC direction to the ASI to conduct a scientific probe of the Shivling-like structure through carbon dating and ground penetrating radar (GPR).
Justice Mishra called the ASI official’s attitude “lethargic” and said inaction had hampered the court proceedings.
However, the court gave the ASI DG a last opportunity to file a counter-affidavit in the case by April 17, the next date of hearing.
The HC observed, “Certainly, this lethargic attitude on the part of the Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, is highly deplorable and such practice must be deprecated. The desired report has not been submitted as directed since November 2022.”
“A high authority holding post of Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, controlling particular administration all over the country must know the seriousness of the matter and ought to respect the orders of the court, primarily of higher courts,” the bench added.
The HC clarified that it will not permit any authority to occasion delay on the pretext of the submission of the desired report of the ASI.
Earlier, hearing the matter on November 5, the HC had issued a notice to the ASI, essentially asking the ASI DG, to give her opinion by November 21, 2022.
In its October 14 order, the Varanasi court had rejected Hindu worshippers’ plea for conducting a scientific probe of the Shivling-like structure, reportedly found inside Gyanvapi mosque complex on May 16, 2022.
The Hindu side has been calling the structure in question a Shivling, while the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, which manages the Gyanvapi mosque, has been terming it a fountain.
Price: [price_with_discount] (as of [price_update_date] – Details)
[ad_1] Kitchen Accessories Storage Organizer 🎁Extra Counter Space: Spice Rack Magnetic is ideal for your limited space, which will free up valuable counter/ cabinet space and keep them neat and tidy. It is absolutely amazing space saver for fridge side storage racks and organizer for small kitchens, apartments, or limited spaces, which answer your need for extra storage and keeping your home organized 🎁Widely Used: Magnetic Shelf For Refrigerator Is Ideal For Fridges, Iron Oven And Other Metal Surfaces, Keeps Spices Conveniently Within Reach And Keep Your Kitchen Looking Organized. 🎁Awesome Spice Rack: Made of high-quality thick steel, it is durable and has super-strong magnets on the back. The surface is treated with black matte finish. It fits perfectly into your kitchen. 🎁SPACE SAVER: Keep all your spices, salt shaker, olive oil, seasonings, tea, coffee syrup organized in one spot with this magnetic shelves, which hold free up precious countertop/ cabinet space and keep them clear of clutter. Keep spices conveniently within reach and your kitchen organized.
The laptop with TÜV Rheinland certified with Dell ComfortView software technology that helps reduce harmful blue light emissions to make extended screen time easy on your eyes, while a spill resistant, full-size keyboard with larger touchpad keeps your mind at ease while you work away. If you want to dial up your viewing experience, an FHD display panel elevates the brightness and vivid color.
TUV Certified (ID#1111249389 – Low Blue Light Content).
Keep business moving
Everyday tasks are quickly handled with ease using 12th Gen Intel Core Processors. Plus, SSD storage delivers fast and smooth performance. And with 80% charge in one hour using Express Charge, you know you can rely on your device to power through the day.
ExpressCharge must be enabled within Dell Power Manager software. System must be powered off in hibernation mode for ExpressCharge feature to function. After charging has reached the stated capacity, charging speed will return to normal speed. Recommended for use with the provided Dell power adapter; not recommended with a smaller capacity power adapter. Charging times may vary.
Stay secure
The Trusted Platform Module 2.0 is a commercial-grade security chip installed on the motherboard that creates and stores passwords and encryption keys. It verifies that the computer has not been tampered with before booting up and protects your data against external software attacks. Meanwhile, the fingerprint reader with Windows Hello allows you to easily and securely log in with just one touch. For added protection, a wedge-shaped lock slot provides an extra layer of security.
Sustainability Comes Naturally.
Dell incorporates sustainability into everything we do, from choosing sustainable materials for products and packaging to reusing, remanufacturing or responsibly recycling them at the end of their lifecycle.
Ports and Slots
1. SD card reader 2. USB 2.0 3. RJ-45 4. Headset jack 5. Wedge shaped lock slot 6. Power jack 7. HDMI 1.4 8. USB 3.2 Gen 1 9. USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type C
3.5mm Headset Jack functionality varies by model configuration. For best results, use Dell recommended audio accessories. HDMI 1.4 (Maximum resolution supported over HDMI is 1920×1080 @60Hz. No 4K/2K output)
RAM & Storage: 8 GB, 1 x 8 GB, DDR4, 2666 MHz & 512GB SSD Graphics & Keyboard: Integrated & Standard Keyboard Display: 14.0″ (35.56Cms) FHD WVA AG Narrow Border 250 nits Ports: 1 USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C port with DisplayPort 1.4, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 1 port, 1 USB 2.0 port, 1 Headset jack, 1 HDMI 1.4 port*,1 Flip-Down RJ-45 port 10/100/1000 Mbps, 1 SD 3.0 card slot WiFI & Bluetooth: 802.11ac 1×1 WiFi and Bluetooth
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has granted the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) the last opportunity to file its response by April 5 clarifying whether the process of carbon dating will damage an object, claimed to be a “Shivling”, found inside the Gyanvapi mosque or safe evaluation of its age can be done.
The Hindu petitioners have claimed the object to be a “Shivling”. The claim was disputed by the Muslim side, which said the object was part of a “fountain”.
The court expressed its displeasure over non-filing of response by the ASI despite eight months’ time being given to it.
The court fixed April 5 for the next hearing.
The petitioners, Laxmi Devi and three others, have filed the present civil revision petition, challenging a Varanasi court order that had rejected the demand for carbon dating and scientific determination of the purported ‘Shivling’, found during a court-mandated survey of Gyanvapi mosque premises on May 16, 2022.
On Monday, when the case was taken up, the counsel for the ASI sought more time to file its response as according to him, the ASI has to obtain advice from other agencies as well.
Expressing displeasure over the delay in filing response, Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra observed, “The time extension application has already been given in the garb of obtaining advice from other agencies. Further time should not be sought by the ASI, as the ASI may take advice as it thinks appropriate by embarking upon a process which would expedite the matter. It should not be allowed to go on any further from April 5, 2023.”
The court also directed the trial court in Varanasi, where this case is pending, to fix the date in the trial after April 5.
The petitioners have challenged the Varanasi court’s order of October 14 last year, rejecting Hindu worshippers’ plea for conducting a scientific probe of the ‘Shivling’.
Carbon dating is a method of calculating the age of very old objects by measuring the amounts of different forms of carbon in them.
Price: [price_with_discount] (as of [price_update_date] – Details)
[ad_1]
From the manufacturer
Daily to-do’s, done
The speed you need:Featuring up to an 11th generation Intel Core i3 processor with dual drive SSD and HDD options for a more responsive and quieter performance.
Just your type: Get an expansive keyboard with a numeric keypad, 6.4% larger keycaps and a spacious touchpad that makes it easier to navigate your content. Upgrade to an optional backlit keyboard to continue working even in low-lit situations.
All day any day: Work in comfort thanks to a lift hinge that raises your device to an ergonomic angle, which provides a more comfortable typing angle.
Easy on the eyes: Dell ComfortView Low Blue Light (LBL) solutions help reduce harmful blue light emissions and optimize eye comfort over extended viewing.
More to see: Get more screen in a 15.6″ laptop with three-side narrow borders for an immersive FHD viewing experience.
A modern, thoughtful design
Natural color: Styled in classic carbon black or platinum silver for a refined look.
Connect with confidence: A built-in HD webcam that makes you look great.
Everyday considerations: Designed to last through regular use, with tiny rubber feet and bumpers on the hinge that keep it from skidding and provide additional stability when on hard surfaces.
Thoughtful design. Purposeful features
A second life: Incorporating the use of post-consumer recycled plastics, these laptops take a step towards being sustainable, helping to keep plastics out of landfills.
Paint a picture: All painted parts use low VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds) waterborne paint*.
Packaging for the planet: The packaging tray for your Inspiron 15 3000 is made from 100% recycled paper, while other packaging components* are comprised of up to 90% recycled materials.
Easy-to-use technology
Waiting for you: Your always-ready experience starts as soon as you open your device. Turn on, boot-up, and log-in quickly with Adaptive Connected Modern Standby. A lid-open sensor gets the laptop started when opened, even if completely off or hibernating.
Ready, set, charge: Comes with ExpressCharge capabilities that minimize the time you spend tethered to an outlet and will recharge your battery up to 80% in 60 minutes
RAM & Storage: 8GB DDR4 & 512GB SSD Graphics & Keyboard: Integrated & Standard Keyboard Diaply: 15.6″ FHD WVA AG Narrow Border Ports: 2x USB 3.2 Gen1 ,1x USB 2.0, HDMI 1.4, SD Card reader, Audio jack, 1 M.2 2230/2280 slot for solid-state drive/Intel Optane
