Tag: bills

  • Washington governor signs three gun-control bills into law

    Washington governor signs three gun-control bills into law

    [ad_1]

    Washington’s Governor Jay Inslee signed a trio of bills meant to prevent gun violence on Tuesday – one banning the sale of certain semi-automatic rifles, one imposing a 10-day waiting period on firearms purchases, and one clearing the way for lawsuits against gun makers or sellers in certain cases.

    A crowd of gun-control activists and Democratic lawmakers broke into cheers as he signed the measures, which he said would not solve all gun violence but would save lives.

    “Just because they don’t solve all the problems does not mean the state of Washington does not take action,” Inslee said. “Inaction against gun violence is unacceptable.”

    The White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, praised Washington state officials for passing the ban on selling specific semi-automatic weapons. President Joe Biden “commends the leadership of Washington Governor Jay Inslee and legislative leaders as well as the advocates, survivors and elected officials who fought for years to make today a reality”, she said.

    The ban on some semi-automatic weapon sales drew a quick legal challenge from the Second Amendment Foundation, based in Bellevue, Washington; and the Firearms Policy Coalition, based in Sacramento, California. The groups sued in US district court in Tacoma on Tuesday, saying the law violates the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

    “The state of Washington has criminalized one of the most common and important means by which its citizens can exercise their fundamental right to self-defense,” the plaintiffs said.

    Inslee and the state attorney general Bob Ferguson, both Democrats, pushed for the Democratic-controlled Washington legislature to pass the ban on many semi-automatic weapons this session after years of failed attempts. The US is setting a record pace for mass killings this year, all of which have involved firearms, according to a database maintained by the Associated Press, USA Today and Northeastern University.

    Washington’s new law prohibits the future sale, distribution, manufacture and import of more than 50 types of guns, including AR- and AK-style rifles. The measure does not bar the possession of the weapons by people who already have them.

    Washington is the 10th state – after California, Hawaii, Illinois and New York – to enact such a law.

    The bill concerning lawsuits against gun manufacturers and sellers requires them to exercise reasonable controls in making, selling and marketing weapons, including steps to keep guns from being sold to people known to be dangerous or to buyers who might buy weapons on someone else’s behalf. It allows the attorney general or private parties, such as the family members of victims, to sue over violations or damages.

    The third measure, including the 10-day waiting period, will create an important buffer between people in crisis and a firearm, Inslee said. That measure also requires all gun buyers to show they’ve taken safety training.

    Washington has moved to tighten the state’s gun laws in recent years, after a young man in 2016 used a newly purchased AR-15 semi-automatic rifle with a 30-round magazine to kill three teens and wound another at a house party north of Seattle.

    Last year the governor signed a package of gun bills, including one that banned the manufacture, distribution and sale of firearm magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

    [ad_2]
    #Washington #governor #signs #guncontrol #bills #law
    ( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )

  • ‘Decide bills as soon as possible’: SC on KCR-Governor row

    ‘Decide bills as soon as possible’: SC on KCR-Governor row

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday observed that the Constitution’s Article 200(1) and the words “as soon as possible” have a significant constitutional intent and must be borne in mind by constitutional functionaries, while hearing a plea filed by the Telangana government seeking direction to Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan to clear ten bills passed by the Assembly and awaiting her assent.

    A bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising Justice P.S. Narasimha said: “Article 200 of the Constitution… the first proviso of Article 200 states that Governor may, as soon as possible, after the presentation of the bill for assent, return the bill, if it is not Money Bill together with the message for reconsideration to the state legislature.”

    The bench said the expression “as soon as possible” has a significant constitutional intent and must be borne in mind by constitutional authorities.

    MS Education Academy

    As Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Telangana Governor, submitted that this observation in the order was not necessary, the Chief Justice said: “Mr Solicitor, we have not made this observation about this particular Governor. We said it must be borne in mind by constitutional authorities.”.

    Mehta said: “This was not needed… I can say nothing more… I do not want to vitiate the atmosphere further.”

    Article 200 of the Constitution empowers the Governor to either assent to a Bill passed by the state legislature or to withhold assent therefrom or to reserve the Bill for consideration of the President.

    The top court disposed of the petition after Mehta submitted that he took instructions following a direction and as of now, no bills are pending.

    During the hearing, senior advocate Dushyant Dave, representing the Telangana government, urged the court to pass directions “once and for all” to put the issue at rest and said “your lordships may decide this once and for all. In Madhya Pradesh bills are being assented to within one week, in Gujarat within one month. Telangana is an opposition state….so this is happening.”

    Mehta opposed these submissions and contended that he would not generalise the matter like that.

    Dave then said, “You will not because you’re a law officer appointed by the Central government” and Mehta responded that shouting will not help before this court.

    Dave said, “Did I shout? This is the law officer of India. Every time I appear, he has an allergy to me. I have an allergy to you… He has stooped so low, I haven’t seen this in 44 years!”

    In March, the Telangana government approached the Supreme Court seeking direction from Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan to give her approval to the bills passed by the state legislature. In a writ petition, the state government has brought to the notice of the Supreme Court that 10 bills are pending with Raj Bhavan. While seven bills are pending since September 2022, three bills were sent to the Governor last month for her approval.

    The plea contended that Article 200 empowers the Governor to either assent to a Bill passed by the state legislature or to withhold assent therefrom or to reserve the Bill for consideration of the president and this power is however to be exercised “as soon as possible”.

    [ad_2]
    #Decide #bills #KCRGovernor #row

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Kerala to consider Stalin’s proposal on time limit for Governor’s assent to Bills

    Kerala to consider Stalin’s proposal on time limit for Governor’s assent to Bills

    [ad_1]

    Thiruvananthapuram: Joint action against Governors’ moves that curtail State governments’ functioning and threaten federal principles is imperative, Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said on Tuesday.

    Vijayan said his government will consider with “utmost seriousness” Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin’s proposal for States to pass Assembly resolutions seeking time frame for Governor to clear State Bills.

    Responding to a letter written by Stalin, who had proposed to pass a resolution in the Kerala Assembly similar to that passed by the Tamil Nadu Legislature to fix the time limit for Governors to approve the bills, Vijayan said as defenders of the federal spirit of our Constitution, “we have to cooperate in every effort to prevent the curtailing of the functioning of elected state governments.”

    MS Education Academy

    “Even though the time period for giving assent to the bills is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, it has to be a reasonable one,” he said.

    A week after the Tamil Nadu Assembly adopted a resolution in this regard, Vijayan said going by the experience of many States, the Justice M N Venkatachaliah Commission to review the working of the Constitution and the Justice M M Punchi Commission on Union-State Relations has recommended mentioning a time limit, within which the Governor has to take a decision on giving assent to bills, in Article 200.

    “In this matter, we are ready to extend wholehearted cooperation to you and will consider the proposal in your letter with utmost seriousness,” the Kerala Chief Minister said in the letter, offering full support to the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister for future actions.

    In his April 11 letter to Vijayan, Stalin explained the circumstances that forced the Tamil Nadu Assembly to pass a resolution to fix a time limit for the Governors to approve bills passed by the respective legislatures and requested the Kerala CM to extend his support in this regard to uphold the sovereignty and self-respect of the State governments and the legislatures by passing a similar resolution in the Kerala Assembly.

    Fully appreciating the views expressed by the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister in the letter, Vijayan said they were in consonance with “the stand taken by us” in Kerala.

    “As you have rightly stated, presently elected governments in many states are facing this issue. In Kerala too, certain bills passed by the State Assembly after due deliberation have been kept pending by the Governor for an unduly long time, some for more than a year. This despite the fact that the ministers and officials have personally visited and given the clarifications sought by the Governor,” he said.

    The Kerala Chief Minister said putting a halt, that too for an inordinately long time, to the legislative measures passed by the State Assemblies which represent the will of the electorate tantamounts to nothing short of negation of democratic rights of the people.

    Vijayan alleged that the time-tested convention of parliamentary democracy that the Governor has to act in accordance with the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers is being violated through the act of holding back assent to the bills passed by the legislature.

    He said the Constitutional discretion of the Governor operates in narrow confines of the Articles, where there is explicit mention of the word discretion and in extreme situation of invoking Article 356, which was expected to remain a dead letter, as agreed to by the eminent Constitution maker Dr B R Ambedkar in Constituent Assembly Debates.

    “Article 356, instead of remaining a dead letter has been put to oft-repeated use (many times misuse) to oust State governments enjoying majority support in the Assemblies. The examples are the dismissal of the Communist government headed by Shri E M S Namboodiripad in Kerala in 1959 and the DMK Government headed by Thiru M Karunanidhi in Tamil Nadu in 1976 and 1991”, Vijayan said.

    Later, in a tweet, Vijayan said, “Joint action against Governors’ moves that curtail State Govts’ functioning and threaten our federal principles is imperative. Thiru @mkstalin’s proposal for coordinated efforts in this regard is highly appreciated.”

    Stalin thanked Vijayan for his prompt response to his letter.

    “Thank you Hon @PinarayiVijayan for your prompt response to my letter & extending full support. TN & Kerala have traditionally stood as a bulwark against any attempt to erode state autonomy. We will win in our crusade against the gubernatorial overreach too,” the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister tweeted.

    The Tamil Nadu Assembly on April 10 adopted a resolution urging the Centre and President to fix a timeframe for State Governors to approve Bills adopted by the House, indicating increasing dissension between the DMK government and Governor R N Ravi.

    Chief Minister Stalin who piloted the resolution fired sharp barbs at Ravi accusing him of being more faithful to the BJP leadership than the Constitution of India.

    “I will not say that the Governor doesn’t know the Constitution. But, his political allegiance has swallowed his loyalty to the Constitution,” Stalin had said and cautioned that he would not remain idle if the Governor continued to target his government for political reasons.

    [ad_2]
    #Kerala #Stalins #proposal #time #limit #Governors #assent #Bills

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • White House threatens to veto GOP bills reversing D.C. police reforms, restricting  transgender athletes

    White House threatens to veto GOP bills reversing D.C. police reforms, restricting transgender athletes

    [ad_1]

    The bill “targets people for who they are and therefore is discriminatory,” the White House’s Office of Management and Budget wrote. “Politicians should not dictate a one-size-fits-all requirement that forces coaches to remove kids from their teams.”

    The statement notes that local schools, coaches and athletic associations are already working on participation rules for transgender children. A national ban would disrupt that more nuanced process, it said.

    The threats come ahead of House Republicans’ plan to bring the two proposals to the floor as early as this week in their latest bid to advance agenda items that force congressional Democrats into politically tough votes.

    House Democrats had sought strongly worded veto threats from the administration, particularly when it came to the transgender sports bill, several Hill aides said.

    Democrats are also trying to avoid a repeat of the confusion over Biden’s position on GOP-led bills that prompted many lawmakers to vote against an earlier policing reform rollback in February — only to see Biden decide to support the measure weeks later.

    Jennifer Haberkorn contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]
    #White #House #threatens #veto #GOP #bills #reversing #D.C #police #reforms #restricting #transgender #athletes
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Three Bills accorded assent by Telangana governer: Supreme Court

    Three Bills accorded assent by Telangana governer: Supreme Court

    [ad_1]

    Delhi: Telangana governor’s office on Monday told the Supreme Court that assent has been given to three Bills passed by the state legislature and two others have been reserved for consideration and assent of the President.

    A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala was told by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta that he has received a communication dated April 9 from the secretary to the governor of Telangana in regard to the position of the Bills, which were submitted to the governor for assent.

    The bench took the letter on record and noted that the assents of governor were given for the Bills which include The Telangana Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Bill, 2022, The Telangana Municipalities (Amendment) Bill, 2023, and The Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University (Amendment) Bill, 2023.

    MS Education Academy

    It noted that two Bills which were reserved for consideration and assent of the President are The University of Forestry Telangana Bill, 2022 and The Telangana Universities Common Recruitment Board Bill, 2022.

    The bench recorded in its order that the Bills which are under active consideration of the governor are The Telangana State Private Universities (Establishment and Regulation) (Amendment) Bill, 2022, The Telangana Municipal Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022 and The Telangana Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) (Amendment) Bill, 2022.

    “The statement indicates that certain clarifications have been sought by the Governor from the State Government in regard to Telangana Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Bill 2023,” the bench said in its order.

    It added that it has been stated that the Azamabad Industrial Area (Termination and Regulation of Leases) (Amendment) Bill 2022 has not been submitted as yet by the Law Department to the governor for consideration and assent.

    The court posted the matter for further hearing on April 24.

    On March 27, the top court had deferred to April 10 the hearing on the Telangana government’s plea seeking directions to the state governor to clear 10 Bills that have been passed by the assembly but are awaiting gubernatorial assent.

    The top court was told by Mehta that he had some discussion with the governor on the issue and would make a statement on the next date of hearing.

    Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the Telangana government, had said that in Madhya Pradesh, the governor grants assent to Bills within seven days while in Gujarat, Bills are cleared within a month.

    On March 20, the top court sought the Centre’s response on the plea filed by the state government.

    It had clarified that the court will not issue notice to the office of governor but would like to see the reply of the Union of India on the state government’s plea.

    On March 14, the apex court agreed to hear a petition filed by the Telangana government seeking directions to the state governor to clear 10 pending Bills passed by legislative assembly but are awaiting gubernatorial assent.

    The court had agreed to hear the plea, after Dave mentioned it for urgent listing, saying several Bills of public importance are stuck.

    The state government has said in its petition it is constrained to move the apex court under Article 32 of the Constitution in view of a “constitutional impasse” created on account of refusal of the governor to act on several Bills passed by the state legislature.

    It said Article 200 of the Constitution empowers the governor to either give assent to a Bill passed by the state assembly or to withhold the assent or reserve the Bill for consideration of the President.

    “This power has to be exercised as soon as possible,” it said.

    The state government said several Bills passed by the assembly, including the Telangana Municipal Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022, Telangana Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Amendment Bill 2022 and Telangana Universities Common Recruitment Board Bill, 2022, are awaiting Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan’s nod.

    Soundararajan, a former Tamil Nadu BJP chief, is locked in a running feud with the BRS government in Telangana.

    [ad_2]
    #Bills #accorded #assent #Telangana #governer #Supreme #Court

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • TN adopts resolution to fix time frame for Guvs to approve bills

    TN adopts resolution to fix time frame for Guvs to approve bills

    [ad_1]

    Chennai: The Tamil Nadu assembly on Monday adopted a resolution urging the Union government and the President to ‘fix a time frame’ for the Governors to give assent to bills that were passed by the House.

    The resolution was moved after suspending certain provisions of rule 92(7) and 287 of the Tamil Nadu legislative assembly. The special resolution which needs 3/4th of the votes to be moved in the House was allowed by the Speaker with 144 of the 146 members in the house voting for it.

    The AIADMK walked out of the House while BJP MLAs, C. Saraswathi and M.R. Gandhi voted against the resolution.

    MS Education Academy

    Chief Minister M.K. Stalin while moving the resolution lashed out against the Tamil Nadu Governor R.N. Ravi and said that the Governor was making it a habit to speak against the state government whenever the Prime Minister was in the state or when he (Stalin) was in New Delhi.

    Stalin, while speaking in the House, said, “I don’t want to give a point-by-point rebuttal to the Governor and make the House a political forum. But we can’t remain mute spectators, if the Governor attempts to disturb the House with political intent.”

    He also said, “Two resolutions had to be moved against the Governor in a single budget session. Governor has created the compulsion by acting with political intent. Those who must realise it must realise it. This will be the day for realisation. Governor is not ready to be a friend of the people of Tamil Nadu.”

    The Tamil Nadu Chief Minister said, “I will not say that the Governor does not know the Constitution. But his political loyalty has superseded his loyalty to the Constitution. Hence he is publicly criticising the policies of the government in violation of the Supreme Court orders.”

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #adopts #resolution #fix #time #frame #Guvs #approve #bills

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Telangana Governor clears 3 out of 10 pending Bills

    Telangana Governor clears 3 out of 10 pending Bills

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: With the Telangana government approaching the Supreme Court seeking direction to Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan to take a decision on the Bills pending with her, she has passed three legislations but sent back two others to the state government.

    The Governor has also forwarded two Bills to the President for her assent and kept three others with her.

    There was no clarity about the Bills which the Governor cleared, those which she sent back to the government and the ones she forwarded to Rashtrapati Bhavan.

    MS Education Academy

    The government is understood to have passed Telangana Forest University Bill, Jayashankar Agriculture University Amendment Bill and Telangana Women’s University Bill

    She is reported to have sent to the President Azamabad Industrial Area Amendment Bill and Telangana Motor Vehicle Tax Amendment Bill.

    Her decision came on a day when the Supreme Court was set to resume hearing on the state government’s petition.

    In a writ petition, the state government has brought to the notice of the Supreme Court that 10 Bills are pending with Raj Bhavan.

    While seven Bills were pending since September 2022, three were sent to the Governor in February for her approval.

    The petition pleaded the Supreme Court to declare as illegal, irregular and unconstitutional the delay by the governor.

    “As per the mandate of the Constitution, the Governor has to necessarily clear the bills and any inaction to accord assent would lead to lawlessness,” the state government said in the Special Leave Petition (SLP).

    The state argued that if the governor has any doubts on the bills, she can seek clarifications but she cannot sit on them.

    “If she raises any issues, we will clarify them. She cannot sit on them and the mandate of the Constitution in this regard is clearly in favour of the state,” the government contended.

    This is the second time that the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) has knocked the apex court’s door against the Governor.

    In February, the government moved Telangana High Court seeking direction to the Governor to give her approval to the state Budget for 2023-24. The court, however, had suggested both sides sort out the issue amicably.

    Counsels of both the state government and Raj Bhavan had agreed to a compromise formula. While the government agreed to begin the Budget session of the Legislature with the Governor’s speech and the latter came forward to approve the Budget.

    In November 2022, the Governor had dismissed the allegations by BRS that her office was sitting on some Bills forward by the state government for her assent. She stated that she is taking time for assessing and analyzing the Bills before giving her consent.

    Education Minister P. Sabitha Indra Reddy had subsequently met the Governor to clarify her doubts on the Common Recruitment Board Bill.

    [ad_2]
    #Telangana #Governor #clears #pending #Bills

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Vendors sue Twitter for thousands of dollars in unpaid bills

    Vendors sue Twitter for thousands of dollars in unpaid bills

    [ad_1]

    San Francisco: Elon Musk-run Twitter has been sued by a group of vendors who allege that the micro-blogging platform has failed to pay tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid bills, the media reported.

    White Coat Captioning, YES Consulting and public relations firms Cancomm and Dialogue Mexico alleged in the proposed class-action lawsuit that Twitter is yet to pay bills ranging from around $40,000 to $140,000 for their services, reports CNN.

    The lawsuit has been filed in the California Northern District Court.

    MS Education Academy

    Shannon Liss-Riordan, who has also filed four proposed class-action lawsuits and hundreds of arbitration demands on behalf of laid off Twitter workers, said that “Musk told Twitter vendors that, if they want to get paid, then sue”.

    “He is now getting his wish. Businesses, like employees, should not have to sue to get paid what they are owed,” Liss-Riordan was quoted as saying in the report late on Tuesday.

    Meanwhile, Twitter has also been sued by laid off contract workers who allege they should be treated at par with regular employees.

    The proposed class-action lawsuit claims that Twitter in November laid off numerous workers employed by staffing firm TEKsystems Inc without any advance notice.

    The micro-blogging platform is also facing a lawsuit from a landlord in San Francisco claiming the company has missed rent payments, along with a couple of other lawsuits since Musk took over.

    [ad_2]
    #Vendors #sue #Twitter #thousands #dollars #unpaid #bills

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • JKPaySys To Remain Operational On 31st March For Generation, Submission Of Bills To Treasuries

    JKPaySys To Remain Operational On 31st March For Generation, Submission Of Bills To Treasuries

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: The JKPaySys shall remain operational on 31st March 2023 from 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM for generation and submission of bills to treasuries.

    According to a circular issued here today by the Finance Department in this regard, the DDOs shall generate and submit bills after observing all prescribed codal formalities and any lapse on part of rejection made at treasuries for want of codal formalities/miscalculation will be sole responsibility of DDO concerned.

    The circular reads that the DDOs shall submit the hard copies of the bills to concerned treasuries by or before 12:00 O’clock. The Bills and Claims so presented are liable to special audit, wherever required.

    The document further said that the Treasury Officers shall entertain the claims from DDO’s duly completed in all respects upto prescribed timings and subsequently submit the liability by or before 1:00 PM to respective Directorates who in turn submit to Directorate General Accounts and Treasuries by 1:30 P.M.

    Besides, the payments authorized on 31.03.2023 are processed well in time to avoid last minute rush on various applications as per special arrangement put in place by RBI.

    Treasury Officers will not leave the treasuries unless successful information regarding acknowledge approved, debit notification is received from RBI.

    Any information regarding acknowledgement rejected, return notification for the payments processed on last day of Financial Year (if any) from RBI is communicated to respective DDO0s/NIC well in time for correction/rectification.

    [ad_2]
    #JKPaySys #Remain #Operational #31st #March #Generation #Submission #Bills #Treasuries

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • House Republicans are facing a familiar problem as they try to steer a high-profile package of border bills to the floor. Let’s call it the Lone Star State Standoff.

    House Republicans are facing a familiar problem as they try to steer a high-profile package of border bills to the floor. Let’s call it the Lone Star State Standoff.

    [ad_1]

    “If they try to jam them through, they’re gonna fail on the floor,” Rep. Tony Gonzales warned of the bills.

    [ad_2]
    #House #Republicans #facing #familiar #problem #steer #highprofile #package #border #bills #floor #Lets #call #Lone #Star #State #Standoff
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )