Tag: bill

  • Sachin Tendulkar, his wife meet Bill Gates

    Sachin Tendulkar, his wife meet Bill Gates

    [ad_1]

    Mumbai: Legendary cricketer Sachin Tendulkar and his wife Anjali Tendulkar met with Microsoft Co-founder Bill Gates, here on Tuesday.

    Tendulkar took to twitter to share pictures of his meeting with Gates. In the pictures, Tendulkar and his wife Anjali can be seen posing for the camera with Gates.

    “We are all students for life. Today was a wonderful learning opportunity to gain perspectives on philanthropy – including children’s education and healthcare, which the Sachin Tendulkar Foundation works on,” the former cricketer wrote in the caption of his post.

    “Sharing ideas is a powerful way to solve the world’s challenges. Thanks for your insights @BillGates,” he added.

    Sachin was part of a group that took part in a discussion with Gates on how philanthropic endeavors can inspire meaningful partnerships and have a lasting impact on the world. The meeting was organised by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which works on a variety of social and economic issues around the world.

    The 49-year old, who is widely regarded as one of the greatest batsmen in cricket history, is also known for his philanthropic work in India, particularly in the areas of children’s education and healthcare through the Sachin Tendulkar Foundation.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Sachin #Tendulkar #wife #meet #Bill #Gates

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Bill Gates visits RBI office in Mumbai, holds discussions with Shaktikanta Das

    Bill Gates visits RBI office in Mumbai, holds discussions with Shaktikanta Das

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates on Tuesday visited the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) office in Mumbai, where he held wide-ranging discussions with Governor Shaktikanta Das.

    In a tweet, RBI said that Gates went its office during his visit to India, where he is exploring business opportunities in sectors like health and education.

    Gates had recently indicated that he wants to do business-related activities in India.

    “Like every other country on the planet, India has limited resources. But it has shown us how the world can still make progress in spite of that constraint,” Gates had tweeted on Monday.

    Subscribe us on The Siasat Daily - Google News

    [ad_2]
    #Bill #Gates #visits #RBI #office #Mumbai #holds #discussions #Shaktikanta #Das

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Israeli Parliament advances bill aiming to override top court

    Israeli Parliament advances bill aiming to override top court

    [ad_1]

    Jerusalem: A bill that would allow Israeli lawmakers to override Supreme Court decisions with a simple majority has been advanced by Parliament.

    The “Supreme Court override bill”, which passed in a preliminary vote in Parliament with a 61-52 majority, still needs three full rounds of votes before becoming law, reports Xinhua news agency.

    If approved, the law will enable a narrow majority of 61 lawmakers in the 120-seat Parliament to re-enact laws that have been struck down by the Supreme Court, even if the court finds them unconstitutional.

    This is the latest effort by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right ruling coalition to weaken the Supreme Court and give greater power to the government over the legal system by swiftly passing a series of laws.

    Critics say Netanyahu’s plan to overhaul Israel’s legal system will undermine the independence of the judiciary, weaken the rule of law, and potentially threaten democracy by giving the government too much power.

    Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving leader, returned to office in December 2022 as the leader of the most right-wing governing coalition in the country’s history.

    He is standing a criminal trial over three separate cases of bribery, fraud and breach of trust.

    He denies the charges, saying they are part of a “witch hunt”.

    [ad_2]
    #Israeli #Parliament #advances #bill #aiming #override #top #court

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • D.C. drama: Dems weigh veto fight with Biden over crime bill

    D.C. drama: Dems weigh veto fight with Biden over crime bill

    [ad_1]

    With all 49 Republicans already in favor and many Democrats still undecided, Biden’s party is highly alarmed that the disapproval resolution could pass. That outcome would spotlight the party’s divide over the issues of crime and D.C. self-governance.

    “I have concerns about passage here. Of course, the president could veto. He’s going to have to make that decision,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.). “Congress shouldn’t be bigfooting decisions made by the elected representatives of the people of the District. I will be talking with [Democrats] about this general principle.”

    Biden has come out in opposition to the legislation but not made an explicit veto threat. Democratic leaders believe he is prepared to do so: “I’d assume, but I wouldn’t go any further,” said Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who chairs the Judiciary Committee.

    The reversal of D.C.‘s crime law cannot be filibustered, and if 51 senators vote yes it would be the first time since 1991 that Congress has rolled back a statute in the capital city. It’s a stunning turnaround from last Congress, when 46 senators in the Democratic Caucus went on record to support making D.C. a state while the Democratic House passed its own statehood bill.

    And the shift is in part thanks to the stubborn crime problem in the city members call their part-time home: Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.), who was assaulted in her apartment building last week, was among the Democrats who supported rolling back the D.C. Council’s plan to make changes to some criminal penalties and scrap some mandatory minimum sentences.

    It would only take two Senate defections for the measure to head to Biden’s desk, and Republicans feel they are on the cusp of getting them. In an interview, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) indicated interest in the proposal, though he has not made a firm decision.

    “In West Virginia, they want the tougher codes,” he said. “I would be open to seeing what they want to roll back, and make sure it’s common sense. If it’s reasonable and common sense, yeah.”

    Democrats can more easily block a second House-passed resolution that looked to stop a new city voting rights law that allows noncitizens to vote in local elections. That resolution is not eligible for expedited floor proceedings, and Democrats can bottle it up in committee and object to bringing it up on the floor, according to two people familiar with the floor schedule.

    The crime proposal won’t come to the floor for several weeks. When it does, it may be one of the first tough votes this Congress for Senate Democrats — who control the Senate but cannot stop the disapproval resolution.

    Several Democrats said they were not ready to comment on the crime proposal, including Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Angus King (I-Maine) and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.). Manchin, Kelly, King and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) did not co-sponsor a bill to grant D.C. statehood last Congress.

    Some other Democrats said that, philosophically, Congress should not be chipping away at the city’s autonomy. Washington residents pay taxes but lack congressional representation and are subject to the legislative branch’s oversight on a plethora of matters. The last time Congress rolled back a D.C. law, it was to stop a building from exceeding height limits.

    Since that 1991 episode, Congress has attached riders to larger pieces of legislation to block implementation of the city’s marijuana laws and restrict abortion funding, but this is the first time in a generation that the House and Senate may actively roll back policy passed by the city council. As an undecided Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) put it: “I’m generally not in favor of undoing things that a local government has done.”

    “I don’t think Congress should be, you know, in the role of making them play Mother-May-I on everything,” said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a former mayor and governor. “My default on these is: I’m pretty strongly a home rule guy. When it gets closer we’ll take a look.”

    Senate Republicans took a first step this week, with Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) introducing his resolution of disapproval. In a statement to POLITICO, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said he will support the bill, sealing the 49th and final GOP vote and shifting the focus to Democrats.

    “While I have always been supportive of ending mandatory minimums for nonviolent crimes, I do not think mandatory minimums should be lifted for violent crimes. Because the D.C. bill reduces sentences for violent crime I will support efforts to overturn the D.C. law,” Paul said.

    Even if the resolution gets to 51 votes, it won’t be the end of the story. Biden still has his veto pen.

    “My hope is the president would veto it and stand with the residents of the District of Columbia, stand on principle and recognize that this is not a soft-on-crime piece of legislation,” D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb said in an interview.

    If Biden vetoes the effort, Congress has a high bar to overcome it: two-thirds of both the House and Senate. That would mean at least 17 Senate Democrats and 290 total House members. Thirty-one House Democrats supported the measure, putting it well short of that threshold.

    The White House said in a statement of administration policy that it opposes the resolution and that “Congress should respect the District of Columbia’s autonomy to govern its own local affairs.” Should he go further and explicitly vow to veto the disapproval resolution, it could affect those Democrats who are on the fence.

    “Anytime the president says that he will veto something, it changes the calculus,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). “It means that members may be a lot less inclined to take a position contrary to the president when they know his opposition is so clear.”

    Were the measure to clear Biden’s desk, it would send a signal to the House GOP that it could continue to roll back District laws the conference didn’t agree with. And even if Biden successfully vetoes the resolution, it’s clear that House Republicans are more than willing to battle the D.C. government over its ability to govern itself.

    It’s a sobering reminder for statehood advocates that the window to seek more autonomy has passed — and it’s not clear when it will come again.

    “A couple of years ago, it looked like we were on the doorstep of becoming the 51st state. We still have to work hard every day to aspire to that,” Schwalb said. “We’re now at the whims and the vagaries of a certain small group of politicians who are using the District of Columbia as a prop.”

    [ad_2]
    #D.C #drama #Dems #weigh #veto #fight #Biden #crime #bill
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Pakistan govt calls emergency session of parliament; introduces bill to raise Rs 170 billion taxes

    Pakistan govt calls emergency session of parliament; introduces bill to raise Rs 170 billion taxes

    [ad_1]

    Islamabad: The cash-strapped Pakistan government on Wednesday introduced a money bill in parliament to raise Rs 170 billion in taxes by June this year as part of conditions by the IMF to get the next tranche of an already agreed loan.

    Finance Minister Ishaq Dar presented the Finance (Supplementary) Bill, 2023, in the National Assembly — the lower house — empowered to legislate on money matters.

    Pakistan and IMF officials held 10 days of marathon talks in Islamabad, from January 31 to February 9, but could not reach a deal as the fund demanded prior actions before signing any agreement to release USD 1.1 billion out of the USD 7 billion deal agreed in 2019.

    Speaking in the house after introducing the bill, Dar said the government was aware of the hardships of common people and tried its best to not further burden them through new taxes.

    He also accused the previous government of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) led by Imran Khan of damaging the national economy. “When we were in the government, Pakistan’s economy was 24th largest in the world, but now it has dropped to 47th position,” he said.

    Dar also said that the devastating floods of the last year also played havoc with the economy, creating huge problems for the government.

    The government was forced to bring legislation through the parliament after President Arif Alvi on Tuesday refused to promulgate an ordinance to raise the new taxes and “advised” the finance minister to take parliament into confidence over the Rs 170 billion taxes.

    The Cabinet met after the president’s “refusal” and approved the bill later in the evening after a debate. It also summoned the parliament to meet in an emergency session and pass the new bill.

    The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued an order after the cabinet meeting to enhance a federal excise duty on locally manufactured cigarettes, which would generate up to Rs 60 billion in taxes on tobacco products, while the Finance Division issued a notification increasing the general sales tax by one per cent to 18 per cent to raise another Rs 55 billion.

    The remaining amount of Rs 55 billion to fulfil Rs 170 billion International Monetary Fund (IMF) demand was being collected through an increase in excise duty on airline tickets, and sugary drinks as well as an increase in withholding tax rates through the Finance (Supplementary) Bill 2023.

    Pakistani and IMF officials are now holding talks in virtual settings to finalise a deal to provide the much-needed funds to shore up the foreign exchange that dropped to below USD 3 billion this month.

    [ad_2]
    #Pakistan #govt #calls #emergency #session #parliament #introduces #bill #raise #billion #taxes

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Pawar opposes Electricity Amendment Bill, says its implementation will hit consumers

    Pawar opposes Electricity Amendment Bill, says its implementation will hit consumers

    [ad_1]

    Nashik: Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) president Sharad Pawar on Friday strongly opposed the recently introduced Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2022, in Parliament and asserted its implementation will end subsidy offered to power consumers, adversely affect government-run energy companies and also cause job losses.

    The Rajya Sabha MP said the Opposition will not allow passage of the Bill in Parliament in its existing form and continue to resist its provisions.

    Speaking at an event here, Pawar said the Opposition has clearly conveyed to the Union government that it will not allow the Bill to be passed in its present form.

    “Some days ago, a Bill for amendment to the Electricity Act, 2003, was introduced in Parliament. We oppose it because its implementation will stop power subsidy, shut down government-run energy companies and cause job losses,” said the former Union minister.

    It may get passed in the Lok Sabha because of the majority enjoyed by the Narendra Modi government, but it will not get cleared in the Rajya Sabha, where the ruling dispensation lacks the required numbers, Pawar said.

    Privatisation of public undertakings in the power sector is also under consideration of the government, he claimed.

    “The Bill is before a parliamentary committee. Our stand is we will not allow this law to be passed in its current form,” the NCP leader added.

    Pawar was speaking at a convention of the Maharashtra State Electricity Workers’ Federation.

    The veteran politician said 40,000-42,000 existing vacancies in various state-run power firms should be filled and priority must be given to those working on these posts on contract.

    “These posts should be filled up immediately. Preference should be given to employees working in these companies on contract. In states like Telangana, Punjab and Tamil Nadu contract workers have been absorbed in regular service and this should be done in Maharashtra also,” Pawar added.

    “India is an agriculture-dominated economy. Earlier, 35 per cent people were doing farming, now more than 56 per cent people are involved in farming. There is burden on agriculture and new research is needed to improve the situation,” said the former Union agriculture minister.

    Speaking at the convention, former Maharashtra minister Chhagan Bhujbal said government-run companies in the state should not be privatized.

    All workers, employees, farmers and common people should come together to fight against privatization of state-run firms, said the NCP leader.

    [ad_2]
    #Pawar #opposes #Electricity #Amendment #Bill #implementation #hit #consumers

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Manchin ‘raising hell’ over White House handling of marquee Dem bill

    Manchin ‘raising hell’ over White House handling of marquee Dem bill

    [ad_1]

    state of the union 84741

    He’s even talked directly to Yellen several times about the matter. Summing up his approach of late, Manchin said: “I’ve been raising hell.”

    “They almost act like they gotta send $7,500 or a person won’t buy a car. Which is crazy, ludicrous thinking for the federal government,” Manchin said in an interview this week. “I just totally and absolutely am disagreeing with what they’re doing.”

    A frustrated Manchin is nothing new for Democrats, but the current situation is plainly untenable for them. He’s still undecided on reelection next year in a state that’s critical to keeping their Senate majority. And as Energy Committee chair, he has the power to wreak havoc by slowing down nominees, hauling in Biden officials for public testimony and pushing legislation against the administration’s wishes.

    What’s more, Manchin’s grievances go beyond just the tax credit. He dislikes the public perception of the law he insisted on calling the Inflation Reduction Act, which he sees as an energy security measure rather than a climate change-fighting one — a distinction with a political difference in a deep-red, fossil-fuel state like West Virginia.

    Notably, the Manchin-backed law also requires new sales of oil and gas leases that his progressive colleagues might otherwise have opposed. So as he weighs a bid for reelection, he’s touting the power of the bill he wrote in order to puncture Democratic hopes of ending U.S. reliance on fossil fuels.

    At Wednesday’s Senate Democratic retreat, Manchin handed out a one-page summary of his perspective on the proposal he revived last summer in a nearly singlehanded show of force, telling colleagues that the U.S. is on track to energy independence as a result of it, according to a person briefed on the meeting who spoke candidly on condition of anonymity.

    “This is bullshit. So they’re gonna basically starve us out of energy that we have a tremendous, abundant supply of because of their aspirational thoughts?” Manchin said of fellow Democrats who want to quickly transition the nation away from oil and gas. “I will continue to fight and I’ll do everything I can to make sure the public knows what they’re doing and what it will do to you and your economy and your lifestyle.”

    Manchin’s approval ratings back home took a hit after he supported the Inflation Reduction Act. And being at odds with the White House is just good politics for red-state Democrats. In a similar turn, Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) is openly skeptical of the Biden administration’s response to the Chinese spy balloon that flew over his state last week, and he will hold a hearing Thursday on it.

    Some in the administration and the Senate see Manchin’s moves as catering to his state’s conservative voters as he considers whether to run again for six more years in deep-red territory. West Virginia continues to depend on energy production for its economy, and Manchin’s fight to preserve a fossil-fuel bridge to a clean energy future may play well there.

    Still, at the moment the schism is alarming enough that Democrats are working to patch things over. Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), a close Biden ally, recently traveled to Europe with Manchin and is among those hoping to turn down the temperature.

    “I recognize that this is a tense and challenging dynamic, but one where I hope to be able to contribute,” Coons said.

    And Republicans, all of whom opposed the Inflation Reduction Act, are reveling in the discord.

    “It’s clear the Democrats have no clue what they voted for. Only a full repeal would fix it,” said Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), the No. 3 Senate Republican and the ranking member of the Energy Committee.

    This is not the nadir of relations between the president and Manchin. It was only 14 months ago that the senator pulled the plug on the sweeping, more expensive and liberal-leaning party-line bill known as “Build Back Better,” with the White House accusing him of a “breach of his commitments to the president.” Since, the two Joes have rekindled their partnership — until the last few weeks.

    The president is subtly working to smooth things over. On Tuesday evening during the State of the Union, Biden stated that “We’re still going to need oil and gas for a while,” adding that it would be at least 10 years, if not more, before the country can wean itself off those fuels.

    And the White House is done going after Manchin. In a statement, spokesperson Michael Kikukawa said that Biden “has great respect for Senator Manchin and communicates with him frequently about the important task of implementing the Inflation Reduction Act in a way that achieves President Biden’s and Congress’ goals.”

    Manchin is not nearly as cool to Biden as he was toward former President Barack Obama, whom he did not support in the 2012 election. To hear Manchin tell it, Biden is caught between his personal views and a more progressive Democratic Party that runs much of the day-to day-work in his administration.

    “Joe’s been pushed pretty hard,” Manchin said. “I’m pleased that he’s worked his way back to where I think he always has been, that center left. But, the headwinds are strong there, and they keep going.”

    The Treasury Department is expected to finalize its guidance for the credit in March, giving consumers at least a few more weeks of access to the full tax credit regardless of the sourcing used for electric-vehicle parts. Treasury did not comment for this story, but released a white paper outlining how complicated the issue is and said last month it needed extra time “to work through significant complexities.” The department has already implemented an income cap on tax credits.

    Manchin said that, during his conversations with Yellen, he’s told her she’s “absolutely out of your wheelhouse” in her implementation of the law. Some Democrats, however, are perfectly comfortable with it.

    “I completely agree with Joe Manchin in creating industrial policy to build that stuff here. But we also have to manage the supply chain between now and when those factories open,” said Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), “It takes three years to build a factory.”

    For Manchin, that’s kind of the point. He took the leap to plow hundreds of billions of dollars into clean and domestic energy, shore up health care access and raise taxes on corporations, in part to reorient the economy toward his vision. He wants a supply chain anchored domestically, with his state competing for the accompanying energy jobs — and if that means fewer tax credits designed to boost clean cars for a while, so be it.

    The Inflation Reduction Act “was passed for energy security, not purely for accelerating the environmental pathway. That’s not going to happen until the technology’s there,” Manchin said. “It’s not going to happen overnight. They know it. We know it.”

    Josh Siegel contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]
    #Manchin #raising #hell #White #House #handling #marquee #Dem #bill
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • YSRCP to move private member’s bill in Parliament seeking special status for AP

    YSRCP to move private member’s bill in Parliament seeking special status for AP

    [ad_1]

    New Delhi: The YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) will move a private member’s bill in the current session of Parliament seeking the special category state status to Andhra Pradesh.

    The bill seeking to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 was listed for introduction in the Lok Sabha on Friday but it could not be taken up due to the adjournment of the House.

    “Our long-pending demand for special category status has not been met by the government. There was no option but to bring a private member’s bill,” Lok Sabha MP from Anantapur constituency Talari Rangaiah told reporters here.

    The party members and the chief minister have raised this issue several times within and outside Parliament in the past few years, but unfortunately the central government has not fulfilled its promise made during the state’s bifurcation, he said.

    With this private member’s bill, the YSRCP wants to raise awareness about the issue which is important for the economic development of Andhra Pradesh, Rangaiah said and expressed confidence of getting support from the Opposition parties.

    N Reddeppa, the Lok Sabha MP from Chittoor, said the party has also demanded setting up of a railway zone in Vishakapatnam, Rs 5,000 crore allocation for AIIMS in Amaravati and budgetary allocation for inter-linking of rivers project.

    The party will continue to fight until the demands are fulfilled, he added.

    Subhash Chandra Bose Alluri, the MP from Narsapuram, said funds are required for the development of the state. A special category status will help Andhra Pradesh attract more investments and revive its economy.

    In 2014, Andhra Pradesh was promised special category status by the Congress government at the Centre during the state’s bifurcation and by the BJP during the course of its 2014 election campaign.

    Manmohan Singh, who was then prime minister, had assured in the the Rajya Sabha that a special status would be extended to Andhra Pradesh for five years. This oral submission has been the basis for Andhra Pradesh’s claim to the status.

    However, the granting of special category status was restricted by the 14th Finance Commission which did away with the distinction between general and special category states.

    [ad_2]
    #YSRCP #move #private #members #bill #Parliament #seeking #special #status

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • House GOP passes bill to curb Biden’s use of oil reserve

    House GOP passes bill to curb Biden’s use of oil reserve

    [ad_1]

    20230110 gop 2 francis 9

    The bill would prohibit non-emergency releases from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve unless the government approves a corresponding increase in domestic oil and gas production on federal lands.

    The extensive floor time spent on the SPR bill — the second such measure passed by the House this month — showcased the GOP plans to target Biden’s broader efforts to wean the economy off the fossil fuels that drive climate change, which Republicans say is leaving the country vulnerable to supply shortages.

    Republicans’ decision to open up the vote to free-wheeling debate through a “modified open rule” prompted Democrats to submit dozens of amendments aiming to curtail a GOP drilling push.

    The House passed legislation two weeks ago that would ban sales from the reserve to China. Lawmakers adopted an amendment Thursday as part of H.R. 21 that would extend the ban to Russia, Iran and North Korea. Both of those efforts drew significant Democratic support.

    Republicans cast the new bill in national security terms, accusing Biden of recklessly making politically timed releases ahead of the midterm election. They contend he has depleted the emergency reserve, which was created in 1975 in response to the Arab oil embargo.

    “If there’s a hurricane that hits the Gulf [and] disrupts the oil markets, you’ve got oil there to make sure you can continue to flow oil to your refineries to keep the supply going. It’s not there to mask bad policies,” Majority Leader Steve Scalise
    (R-La.) said on the House floor Thursday during debate on the bill.

    Biden has proposed a plan for replenishing the stockpile after ordering the biggest crude oil releases by far in the history of the reserve — it has fallen by 266 million barrels from 638 million barrels since he took office. Its current level of 372 million barrels is its lowest level since 1983.

    But he’s far from the first president to draw down supply — Presidents George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush and Barack Obama all released barrels from the reserve. And Congress in recent years turned to the reserve as a way to pay for unrelated priorities, with lawmakers of both parties approving sales to pay for needs such as funding the government.

    Democrats said the GOP’s latest proposal would hamstring presidents from using the reserve in the event of an emergency that could drive up gas prices during a future oil shortage, arguing Biden appropriately and effectively used the SPR to tame high prices that worsened after Russia invaded Ukraine. The Treasury Department has estimated that the Biden administration’s releases reduced gasoline prices by up to 40 cents per gallon.

    “We know as prices went up, we should use every tool in our arsenal to bring them down,” Rep. Frank Pallone of New Jersey, the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said in a floor speech Friday. “That’s what President Biden did. He decided to use the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to provide more supply and bring down prices and it succeeded in doing that. Why would the Republicans want to deny the president, not just President Biden, but any president that opportunity?”

    The GOP bill, though, would provide an exception “in the case of a severe energy supply interruption,” caused by hurricanes or other natural disasters, which Republicans argued are the scenarios that should prompt SPR withdrawals.

    House Republicans are next expected to devote time to moving their broader energy agenda centered on easing permitting rules to expand energy production and mining of critical minerals.

    “This is a direct approach on a specific issue with the SPR,” House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.) said in an interview. “Americans probably have heard more about the Strategic Petroleum Reserve this week than they ever knew or cared to know. But we are going to be looking at much broader energy bills where we will not just focus on onshore and offshore oil and gas production, but also the other component that goes with renewable energy and with electrification and decarbonization and that’s mining.”

    [ad_2]
    #House #GOP #passes #bill #curb #Bidens #oil #reserve
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Rs 54-lakh bill for 10-day treatment at hospital in Hyderabad

    Rs 54-lakh bill for 10-day treatment at hospital in Hyderabad

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: Yet another incident of patients being charged exorbitantly by private hospitals in Hyderabad came to the limelight.

    As per a hospital bill shared by spokesman Majlis Bachao Tehreek (MBT) Amjed Ullah Khan, a patient by name Syed Rahmath Uddin has been charged Rs 54 lakhs for 10-day treatment at a hospital in Hyderabad.

    Khan also mentioned that the family members of the patient so far paid Rs 20 lakhs.

    Khan, in another tweet, mentioned that the hospital is demanding Rs 29 lakhs more and requested the concerned authorities to take necessary action to shift the patient to Gandhi or NIMS hospital.

    Inflated bills by private hospitals

    It is not the first time, earlier too, private hospitals in Hyderabad were in focus when some of them inflated bills for COVID treatment.

    Earlier, the Telangana Public Health and Family Welfare Department asked 44 private hospitals to refund money to patients who were overcharged during COVID treatment. Out of them, four hospitals returned more than 10 lakhs each.

    Eight hospitals returned amounts somewhere between Rs. 5 lakhs and 10 lakhs. Five hospitals returned amounts that range from Rs 3.2 lakhs to Rs 399440.

    As per the details revealed by an RTI reply, a total of Rs 1,61,22,484 was returned to the patients as of June 22, 2021.

    People hesitate to visit private hospitals in Hyderabad

    Usually, middle-class and BPL people hesitate to visit private hospitals in Hyderabad due to heavy medical costs. Their problem becomes adverse at the hospitals if patients are not covered under any health insurance.

    Though government schemes exist to help poor people avail treatment at a private hospital, they have an upper cap.

    For example, after the merger of the Telangana government’s Aarogyasri Health Scheme and Centre’s Ayushman Bharat Scheme, maximum health protection has gone up to Rs 5 lakh per family per annum.

    Apart from the upper cap, the scheme covers a set of diseases only.



    [ad_2]
    #54lakh #bill #10day #treatment #hospital #Hyderabad

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )