Tag: Banks

  • Bank Holidays in May 2023: Banks to remain closed for 12 days in May, get full state-wise bank holiday list – Kashmir News

    Bank Holidays in May 2023: Banks to remain closed for 12 days in May, get full state-wise bank holiday list – Kashmir News

    [ad_1]

    Bank Holidays in May 2023: Banks to remain closed for 12 days in May, get full state-wise bank holiday list – Kashmir News

    [ad_2]
    #Bank #Holidays #Banks #remain #closed #days #full #statewise #bank #holiday #list #Kashmir #News

    ( With inputs from : kashmirnews.in )

  • FCIK Demands Govt Intervention To Stop JK Bank’s ‘Smear Campaign’

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: The Federation of Chambers of Industries Kashmir (FCIK) has called for immediate intervention by the UT government in resolving issues between J&K Bank and MSMEs, in order to put a stop to the maligning campaign launched by the former against non-performing assets (NPAs) without giving them a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

    The demand was made in a marathon meeting between the FCIK Advisory Committee and Presidents of organized industrial estates, held at FCIK headquarters under the chairmanship of M.D. Qureshi, which was attended by Presidents of industrial estates including Lassipora, Khunmoh, Rangreth, Zainakote, Sanat Nagar, BAMK, Zakura, Anchidora Anantnag, Vessu, Ganderbal, Gagran Shopian, Shalteng, Sopore, Baramullah, Kupwara, besides other members of the Advisory Committee.

    The Presidents of various industrial estates presented a detailed account of continued financial stress currently prevalent in MSMEs owing to a number of reasons which, among other difficulties, has also led to growing NPAs. They said that the unilateral withdrawal of marketing support to MSMEs committed under the industrial policy of 2016-26, coupled with long spells of business interruptions during re-organisation and Covid restrictions, had been the main reason for this financial stress. Further withholding or delaying of payments on account of supply of material and execution of works to government departments and PSUs had contributed to the stressfulness of hundreds of enterprises.

    The meeting regretted that, contrary to acknowledgment of such difficulties, the bank has launched an unwarranted and undesired campaign of maligning and tarnishing the public image of entrepreneurs, adding that such tactics were detrimental not only to the cause of industrial growth and promotion but also to the cordial relations of J&K Bank with local MSMEs.

    The meeting underscored the role of the UT government as mediator between J&K Bank and MSMEs in order to identify an acceptable solution to the issue for the benefit of both parties. The members made it clear that all MSMEs were willing to repay their loans to the bank on the launch of a uniform, non-discriminatory restructuring and OTS schemes with a reasonable timeline. The members reminded that the harsh provisions of SARFAESI Act in the UT required some dilution and relief for the reason that the enterprises here were working under most unconducive and disturbed conditions, unlike their counterparts in the rest of the country. The meeting expected the UT government to step in for the sake of reposing faith and confidence of entrepreneurs on their promoters and use its influence as majority shareholders to shape the desired restructuring/OTS schemes. The government also needed to link these schemes with the rehabilitation of sick industrial units under an existent revival and rehabilitation scheme.

    Earlier, the President of Industrial Growth Centre Lassipora, Haji Muzaffar, presented a detailed account of the recent visit of MD and other top officials of J&K Bank and informed about their willingness to facilitate NPAs with a suitable OTS scheme besides enhancing access to credit for prospective and existing industrial units. Muzaffar said that during the extensive visit to various industrial units, the MD and his team had a complete idea and expressed satisfaction on the working of manufacturing units from grassroots.

    The Advisory Committee, while endorsing the views and suggestions of its constituents, assured the meeting to put in their efforts for holding separate and joint meetings with bank authorities and government to find a lasting solution to all bank issues. The constituents vowed their full support to FCIK Advisory Committee in all its steps and programs which they deem necessary in the process of obtaining relief to the industrial units in distress.

    [ad_2]
    #FCIK #Demands #Govt #Intervention #Stop #Banks #Smear #Campaign

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Are banks in Hyderabad closed today? Know holidays in May

    Are banks in Hyderabad closed today? Know holidays in May

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: As May 1 is celebrated as Maharashtra Day and International Labour Day, banks across Hyderabad and several other Indian cities will remain closed. In addition to this, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has announced 11 other bank holidays for May 2023.

    Other cities where banks will remain shut on May 1 are Belapur, Bengaluru, Chennai, Guwahati, Imphal, Kochi, Kolkata, Mumbai, Nagpur, Panaji, Patna, and Thiruvananthapuram.

    List of bank holidays in May

    The RBI has announced a total of 12 bank holidays for May 2023, which include four Sundays and the second and fourth Saturdays. Six of these holidays are recognized under the Negotiable Instruments Act. It’s important to note that bank holidays may vary from state to state, so not all banks across the country will be closed on all 12 days.

    MS Education Academy

    Below is the list of bank holidays in the month of May 2023

    1. May 1: Maharashtra Day/May Day
    2. May 2: Municipal Corporation Elections, 2023 (Shimla)
    3. May 5: Buddha Purnima
    4. May 7: Sunday
    5. May 9: Birthday of Rabindranath Tagore
    6. May 13: Second Saturday
    7. May 14: Sunday
    8. May 16: State Day (Sikkim)
    9. May 21: Sunday
    10. May 22: Maharana Pratap Jayanti (Himachal Pradesh)
    11. May 27: Fourth Saturday
    12. May 28: Sunday

    The banks across Hyderabad will remain closed on May 1, 7, 13, 14, 27 and 28.

    Types of banks in Hyderabad and other Indian cities

    India has various types of banks, each with its unique features and functions. Here’s a list of some of the types of banks in India:

    Public Sector Banks: These banks are owned and operated by the government of India. Examples include the State Bank of India, the Bank of Baroda, and the Punjab National Bank.

    Private Sector Banks: These banks are owned and operated by private companies or individuals. Examples include HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, and Axis Bank.

    Co-operative Banks: These banks are owned and operated by their members. Examples include Saraswat Bank, Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank, and Cosmos Bank.

    Regional Rural Banks: These banks are established to provide banking facilities in rural areas. Examples include Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank, and Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank.

    Payment Banks: These banks are licensed to provide only limited services, such as accepting deposits and making payments. Examples include Airtel Payments Bank, India Post Payments Bank, and Paytm Payments Bank.

    Small Finance Banks: These banks are established to provide banking facilities to small businesses and low-income households. Examples include Ujjivan Small Finance Bank, Equitas Small Finance Bank, and Fincare Small Finance Bank.

    Foreign Banks: These banks are owned and operated by foreign entities. Examples include Citibank, Standard Chartered Bank, and HSBC.

    Most of these types of banks are located in Hyderabad too.

    [ad_2]
    #banks #Hyderabad #closed #today #holidays

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Fed blames Trump-era policies, SVB leaders — and itself — for bank’s stunning collapse

    Fed blames Trump-era policies, SVB leaders — and itself — for bank’s stunning collapse

    [ad_1]

    bank collapse fed review 75924

    Those directives, combined with the Fed’s implementation of a bipartisan bank deregulation law passed by Congress in 2018, “impeded effective supervision by reducing standards, increasing complexity, and promoting a less assertive supervisory approach,” according to the report.

    “We must strengthen the Federal Reserve’s supervision and regulation based on what we have learned,” Barr said in a press release.

    The document is the opening salvo in a renewed debate over bank regulation as the Fed and other agencies consider how to improve their policing of financial risks in the wake of banking industry turmoil. SVB and another regional lender, Signature Bank, failed after depositor runs during the same weekend in March, leading government officials to backstop all deposits for the two failed firms — even those not insured by the FDIC — in a bid to stem the panic.

    The fallout continues, with regulators and Wall Street now anxiously awaiting the fate of San Francisco-based First Republic, which was hammered by more than $100 billion of withdrawals after SVB’s collapse. The bank is furiously seeking avenues to stay afloat, and regulators are reportedly ready to put it in receivership if that effort fails.

    The findings on SVB are likely to lead to tougher rules on regional banks in particular, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell made clear he is backing efforts by Barr, who has been vice chair for supervision since July.

    “I welcome this thorough and self-critical report on Federal Reserve supervision from Vice Chair Barr,” Powell said in the release. “I agree with and support his recommendations to address our rules and supervisory practices, and I am confident they will lead to a stronger and more resilient banking system.”

    But House Financial Services Chair Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) slammed the report as overly political.

    “While there are areas identified by Vice Chair Barr on which we agree … the bulk of the report appears to be a justification of Democrats’ long-held priorities,” McHenry said in a statement. He called it “a thinly veiled attempt to validate the Biden Administration and Congressional Democrats’ calls for more regulation.”

    “Politicizing bank failures does not serve our economy, financial system, or the American people well,” he said.

    McHenry and other lawmakers had been closely awaiting the post-mortem on the Fed’s supervision of SVB as they weigh further scrutiny of the bank’s failure. Barr, in a letter highlighting his conclusions from the report, said he welcomes an external examination of the central bank’s oversight of SVB, including from Congress.

    One major finding is that the central bank has a culture where examiners shy away from taking forceful enough action to get banks to make important changes in a timely way, a senior Fed official told reporters. That problem worsened under Quarles, according to the report.

    “Supervisory practices shifted,” the document states. “In the interviews for this report, staff repeatedly mentioned changes in expectations and practices, including pressure to reduce the burden on firms,” as well as to meet a high bar of evidence before taking action.

    That approach “contributed to delays and, in some cases, led staff not to take action,” according to the report.

    Another problem, the report said, was just how quickly SVB grew, tripling in size in just a few years. Once the bank was big enough to warrant more stringent supervision, it was given considerable time to comply with heightened standards that it wasn’t ready for.

    Barr in his letter said supervisors should begin preparing banks ahead of time for those types of standards.

    Other key policies that Barr said he wants to consider:

    — Raising standards for regional banks.

    — Requiring banks that aren’t well-managed to rely less on debt and have more cash on hand. That could “serve as an important safeguard until risk controls improve, and they can focus management’s attention on the most critical issues.”

    — Targeting incentive pay for senior bank officials as a means to focus their attention on solving serious problems more quickly.

    — Toughening oversight of how banks compensate their leaders more generally.

    — Looking more closely at how much banks are relying on uninsured deposits and safe assets that have dropped in value to be able to get cash quickly in a crisis.

    The Government Accountability Office in its own report released Friday criticized both the Fed’s supervision of SVB and the FDIC’s oversight of Signature Bank. It found that regulators had identified issues with both banks but failed to “escalate supervisory actions in time to prevent the failures.”

    GAO had previously warned in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis about the risks posed by not acting fast enough to make supervisory concerns a priority. The agency in 2011 recommended that federal banking regulators consider incorporating “additional triggers that would require early and forceful regulatory action to address unsafe banking practices” into their supervisory frameworks.

    “While the regulators took steps to address our recommendations, we continue to believe that incorporating noncapital triggers would enhance the framework by encouraging earlier action and giving the regulators and banks more time to address deteriorating conditions before capital is depleted,” GAO said in the report.

    The FDIC in a separate report on Signature’s collapse, also released Friday, conceded that “in retrospect, [it] could have escalated supervisory actions sooner.” But it attributed a large share of the blame to insufficient staffing.

    The team dedicated to overseeing Signature “experienced frequent vacancies and continuous turnover” from 2017 through March 2023. That group was steadily expanded from three in 2017 to nine in 2023, as the bank grew, but had “at least one vacancy 60 percent of the time and had 17 different staff assigned during this time period not including field territory resources that were temporarily assigned to cover gaps.” It also had difficulty finding a qualified person to be the examiner in charge of the bank.

    This is a broader problem in the agency’s New York regional office, it added.

    Katy O’Donnell contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]
    #Fed #blames #Trumpera #policies #SVB #leaders #banks #stunning #collapse
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Top global regulator warns of ‘massive adjustment’ for financial system

    Top global regulator warns of ‘massive adjustment’ for financial system

    [ad_1]

    indonesia g20 03460

    Press play to listen to this article

    Voiced by artificial intelligence.

    AMSTERDAM — The world’s financial system needs a “massive adjustment” to cope with higher interest rates, and key rules will have to be revisited, according to a top global regulator.

    Klaas Knot, chair of the Financial Stability Board, an international standard-setting body, told POLITICO that rising interest rates fueled problems at several regional U.S. banks and similar losses may show up elsewhere.

    “The speed with which interest rates have changed, that, of course, implies a massive adjustment in the financial system,” the Dutchman said in an interview from his office in Amsterdam. He added it was unclear exactly where those losses would be.

    “In many, many places of the financial system, that adjustment will go well because it has been well-anticipated and has been well-managed. But history teaches us that is not always the case everywhere.”

    The warning of potential trouble ahead echoes fears of other global officials and comes after the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, a $200 billion lender to the tech sector, sparked contagion across U.S. regional banks. The subsequent market panic contributed to bringing down Credit Suisse in Europe, forcing the Swiss government to hastily merge the lender with UBS.

    Any domino effect can have huge impacts for the economy, businesses and households.

    “We’ve seen the impact of rapidly changing interest rates manifest in the second tier of the regional U.S. banks,” Knot said. “But I would be very surprised if that was the only sub-sector of the financial system where you would have a significant impact.”

    Despite the turmoil, Knot said he was more worried about risks stashed at “nonbanks” — a term that encompasses investment funds, insurers, private equity, pension funds and hedge funds — where authorities have less visibility on hidden losses.

    “If they are hidden for a very long period of time, sometimes the problem then grows so big, that it only becomes unhidden or visible when it’s too big to deal with,” he said.

    The FSB boss pointed to financial players that took the wrong side of a bet on interest-rates and may now be nursing losses. “I hope, of course, that this is well-dispersed over the financial sector,” he said. “Where we are worried is specific concentrations of such risk.”

    In particular, he said, those losses could be amplified when there is a mismatch between hard-to-sell assets and easy withdrawals, and borrowed money is used to juice returns.

    That combination has worried authorities for some time — but Knot said this didn’t mean regulators are behind. For instance, the FSB, whose membership includes central bankers, financial regulators and finance ministries, will issue recommendations for open-ended investment funds in July.

    Under the plans, regulators would get more powers to trigger restrictions in a crisis, rather than leaving those decisions in the hands of the fund manager.

    Rewriting the rules

    The financial rulebook will need to be revisited substantially in light of recent events, he said.

    “It’s a mistake to see the regulatory framework as something that is fixed, and something that should not be touched,” he said. “The financial industry is not at all fixed, it is continuously evolving. So, the regulatory framework should evolve with the evolving risks.”

    The Dutchman said this means revisiting assumptions about how quickly banks can sell assets to meet depositor withdrawals, the speed of those withdrawals in a digital era, and the reserves that have to be set aside to cover potential unrealized losses from interest-rate risks — all of which were factors in the U.S. bank collapses.



    [ad_2]
    #Top #global #regulator #warns #massive #adjustment #financial #system
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.eu )

  • Body Of A Newborn Found On Banks Of Jhelum

    Body Of A Newborn Found On Banks Of Jhelum

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: A newborn baby boy was found dead on the banks of river Jhelum in Urdu Bazaar, M.R Gunj area of summer capital Srinagar on Tuesday morning.

    Quoting sources, news agency KDC reported that the body of the newborn boy was found by some locals who subsequently informed the police.

    They said that a police team reached the spot and shifted the body to SMHS hospital for medico-legal formalities.

    1320x120 ad feed desktop

    A police officer confirmed the incident and said cognizance of the incident has been taken and further investigation is on.

    [ad_2]
    #Body #Newborn #Banks #Jhelum

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Kashmir-Born Actor Hina Khan Celebrates Eid On Dal, Jhelum Banks

    Kashmir-Born Actor Hina Khan Celebrates Eid On Dal, Jhelum Banks

    [ad_1]

    SRINAGAR: Donning an ethnic handwoven silk anarkali dress, actor Hina Khan on Saturday posted pictures of herself on the banks of Dal lake.

    The Kashmir- born actor recently travelled to Kashmir to celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr in the valley. She took to her Instagram to wish her fans on auspicious occasion of Eid and gave a glimpse of the picturesque Dal Lake through her photos.

    “Kashmir ki kali celebrating Eid in Jannat-e-Kashmir…Eid Mubarak Everyone,” Hina wrote on her Instagram handle.

    1320x120 ad feed desktop

    Meanwhile, fans showered love on Hina’s post and complimented her traditional attire.

    Hina Khan, a popular name in Television industry shot to fame with her role of Akshara in the longest running TV show, Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai.

    She was also a part of the renewed version of Kasautii Zindagii Kay 2, in which she played the antagonist Komolika. Hina Khan was also seen in a brief appearance in the TV show Naagin 5, in which she starred as the titular shape shifting serpent. She also participated in television reality shows like Khatron Ke Khiladi season 8 and Bigg Boss 11. Hina Khan last starred in the web-series Damaged 2 and was last seen in Wish List, which she also produced.

    The actress stepped into films with Lines, the poster of which was unveiled at the 72nd Cannes Film Festival in May, 2019. She attended the prestigious Cannes Film Festival last year too.

    Born to a Kashmiri Muslim family, Hina has been enjoying massive fan following for her work and style statements.

    [ad_2]
    #KashmirBorn #Actor #Hina #Khan #Celebrates #Eid #Dal #Jhelum #Banks

    ( With inputs from : kashmirlife.net )

  • Olaf Scholz faces new probe over German tax fraud scandal

    Olaf Scholz faces new probe over German tax fraud scandal

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    Voiced by artificial intelligence.

    BERLIN — Germany’s center-right opposition wants to raise the heat on Chancellor Olaf Scholz by launching a parliamentary investigation into his alleged connection to a massive tax evasion scandal.

    The case — which dates back over five years to the time when Scholz was still mayor of the Hamburg city-state — is linked to the broader so-called “Cum Ex” affair, under which the German state was defrauded by over €30 billion as some banks, companies, or individuals claimed tax reimbursements from authorities for alleged costs that never occurred.

    The scandal already hung over the Social Democratic politician’s election campaign in 2021 but had little impact in the end as Scholz’s potential involvement remained unclear. Now it is heating up again after new details emerged that put his previous defense in question.

    The Hamburg regional parliament plans to summon Scholz this spring — which will be for the third time — to an investigative committee looking into the scandal. And now the center-right CDU/CSU bloc also wants to set up an inquiry at the national level in the Bundestag.

    “We will request a parliamentary committee of inquiry into the Scholz-Warburg tax affair in the German Bundestag in the first parliamentary week after the Easter vacations,” said the CDU’s Mathias Middelberg, deputy parliamentary group chairman, on Tuesday.

    A government spokesperson said that “as a matter of principle,” Berlin does not comment on decisions announced by Bundestag members “out of respect for the constitutional body,” according to media reports.

    Katja Mast, the Social Democrats’ chief whip, said the CDU/CSU is not following any interest in knowledge, but rather party tactical interests. “They bring up allegations that have long been refuted,” she said, adding that the committee in Hamburg had clarified all questions.

    The CDU/CSU group has enough votes in parliament to be able to set up an investigative committee. The Left party also said it would back such a request. Parliamentary investigative committees can hear witnesses and experts and request access to documents. Although the findings are summarized in a non-binding report, the political consequences, such as for upcoming elections, could be significant.

    In a letter to the CDU/CSU parliamentary group seen by POLITICO, chairmen Friedrich Merz and Alexander Dobrindt said that the case should be investigated due to its “significant” importance for German national politics.

    Scholz has come under scrutiny because of his links to one Hamburg-based bank involved in the tax evasion scheme: During his time as mayor, he met on three separate occasions in private with one of the owners of the M.M. Warburg & Co. bank, which was already under investigation at the time by the Hamburg tax office. Officials were planning to reclaim €47 million, which they believed were ill-gotten gains in connection with the fraud.

    However, in the end, the finance authority let the statute of limitations on the payment demand expire — and years later, after details of Scholz’s meetings with the banker emerged, critics began questioning whether the top Social Democrat might have intervened in favor of the bank.

    Although the chancellor has constantly denied having intervened, he has also given no answer on what was discussed during the private meetings. Instead, Scholz said on several occasions during the past two-and-a-half years that he cannot remember the content of the discussions.

    GettyImages 1242588238
    During his time as mayor of the Hamburg city-state, Scholz met with one of the owners of the M.M. Warburg & Co. Bank, involved in a tax evasion scheme | Morris MacMatzen/Getty Images

    That defense is now being called into question as details emerged of a previous and longtime confidential Bundestag committee hearing with Scholz in July 2020, in which he appeared to easily remember details of his meetings with the banker. His critics argue that Scholz only started to claim having no memory of the meetings when their political and possibly criminal explosiveness became clear.

    “This comprehensive memory gap of the chancellor after an initial memory of a concrete meeting … raises a multitude of questions to be clarified,” the letter from the CDU/CSU states.

    Scholz and his allies have repeatedly rejected such criticism as politically motivated and stressed that past investigations found no wrongdoing. Scholz also highlighted that in the end, the bank did repay the €47 million, albeit only after it was ordered to do so by a court. The Hamburg Public Prosecutor’s Office said in March that it does not see any initial suspicion against the chancellor in the affair.

    That hasn’t discouraged the opposition from planning to dig deeper, though.

    “The chancellor would like to see … a line drawn under the clarification of this tax affair. But it is precisely the task of parliament to control the government, to look closely, especially with so many unanswered questions,” said CDU lawmaker Matthias Hauer.



    [ad_2]
    #Olaf #Scholz #faces #probe #German #tax #fraud #scandal
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.eu )

  • The tension at the heart of the ECB

    The tension at the heart of the ECB

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    Voiced by artificial intelligence.

    FRANKFURT ― The markets are jittery and inflation still needs taming. Coming together, those two things put the European Central Bank in a real bind.

    Fight one fire and it could cause the other to flare. The ECB can keep raising interest rates to try to get inflation under control, but that risks fueling financial market tensions. Conversely, it can give banks some breathing space by slowing its rate-hiking, but that carries the danger of prolonging the region’s economic malaise.

    Frankfurt’s official line is that it can do both with no serious consequences. Many economists in the eurozone don’t buy that.

    In private, it’s a dilemma that splits the ECB’s decision-makers, and even in public differences of opinion are bubbling to the surface. Here’s what’s at stake:

    Why is the ECB raising rates?

    The idea is that increasing interest rates subdues inflation because it makes consumers and businesses less likely to borrow ― so that results in reduced spending.

    As inflation has started to pick up since last summer, the ECB has raised interest rates at a record pace. They’ve gone from -0.5 to 3 percent as the annual rate of price rises has surged to a eurozone record 10.6 percent in October.

    The Bank tries to keep inflation at 2 percent so it’s currently way off target.

    How this contributed to the crisis

    The unpleasant side effect is that with rising borrowing costs (because of higher interest rates), the value of bonds that banks hold usually fall. This gives investors a bad case of the jitters. After the collapse in March of lenders like Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse ― though their problems seemed unconnected ― it was this that prompted concerns they might not be the only institutions with troubles, and fueled contagion fears around the globe.

    But Lagarde plowed on regardless

    The ECB remained unfazed in the face of emerging banking troubles: It delivered a previously signaled 0.5 percentage-point rate increase in March, less than a week after SVB failed and at a time when Swiss banking giant Credit Suisse was teetering.

    Following that decision, ECB President Christine Lagarde stressed that she sees no trade-off between ensuring price stability and financial stability.  

    In fact, she said the Bank could continue to lift rates while addressing banking troubles with other tools.

    The case against

    Many economists disagree with Lagarde that the battle for price stability can be pursued without risking financial stability.

    GettyImages 1248916306
    The ECB delivered 0.5 percentage-point rate increase in March, less than a week after SVB failed | Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images

    Claiming so “should be a career-ending statement,” said Stefan Gerlach, chief economist at EFG Bank in Zurich and a former deputy governor of the Central Bank of Ireland. “This is the idea of the ‘separation principle’ of 2008 revisited. That wasn’t a good idea then, and isn’t now either,” he added.

    What’s the separation principle?

    In 2008, at the start of the financial crisis, as well as in 2011, when the sovereign debt crisis hit, the ECB adhered to the idea that interest rates could be used to ensure price stability at the same time as other measures, such as generous liquidity injections, could ease market tension.

    But this just added to the problems and had to be unwound quickly.

    This time around, the Portuguese member on the ECB Governing Council, whose country suffered particularly under the consequences of the sovereign debt crisis, is less blasé than Lagarde.

    “Our history tells us that we had to backtrack a couple of times already during processes of tightening given threats to financial stability. We cannot risk that this time,” Mario Centeno told POLITICO in an interview. 

    The case for Lagarde

    After the initial fears that troubles could spread across the eurozone, investor nerves have calmed and bank shares started to recover. At the same time, new data showed that underlying inflation pressures kept rising, suggesting that Lagarde and her colleagues were right to stick to their guns ― at least for now.

    If that’s the case, March’s interest rate rise ― what Commerzbank economist Jörg Krämer described as “necessary” investment in the central bank’s credibility ― will have paid off.

    Market turmoil actually helps

    The nervous markets could help the ECB to reach its inflation target without having to raise interest rates as aggressively as previously thought.

    Banks tend to slap an additional risk premium on their lending rates which raises the cost of borrowing money for consumers and business. So banks end up doing part of the tightening job for the central bank.

    ECB Vice President Luis de Guindos suggested as much in an interview released last month, though he cautioned that it was too early to assess how much impact exactly it may have.

    What’s the endgame?

    The challenge for the ECB is to strike the right balance. If it doesn’t it risks either the repeat of 2008-style financial troubles or a return to the stagflationary period (low growth on top of high inflation) that roiled the Continent in the 1970s.

    If it raises rates too aggressively, bank failures followed by a recession risks forcing the ECB into an interest rate U-turn for the third time, creating massive credibility risks. Conversely, if they don’t hike enough, the central bank may lose a grip on inflation, which is its main mandate.

    The only way Lagarde can win is to deliver both price stability and financial stability. In that sense, there is no trade-off ― one without the other just won’t be enough.



    [ad_2]
    #tension #heart #ECB
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.eu )

  • Swiss prosecutors open probe into UBS takeover of Credit Suisse

    Swiss prosecutors open probe into UBS takeover of Credit Suisse

    [ad_1]

    Swiss prosecutors have opened an investigation into possible illegal activity in connection with government support for UBS’s rushed takeover of Credit Suisse.

    The two banks agreed to merge in March as part of an emergency deal targeted at avoiding a national financial crisis that could have had a knock-on effect globally.

    “The Federal Prosecutor’s office wants to proactively fulfill its mission and responsibility to contribute to a clean Swiss financial center and has set up monitoring in order to take immediate action in any situation that falls within its field of activity,” the authority said in a statement.

    Last month, Zurich-based UBS was forced by Swiss authorities to take over its longtime domestic rival Credit Suisse in a deal that creates a new bank.

    The prosecutor’s statement said that the intention of the probe was to “analyze and identify any criminal offenses” associated with the deal, adding that various bodies had been contacted to provide clarifications and information.

    The deal has been unpopular locally and on Sunday, Swiss daily Tages-Anzeiger reported that the new entity could slash jobs by up to 30 percent.

    “If we had done nothing, [Credit Suisse] shares would have been worthless on Monday and the shareholders would have gone home empty-handed,” Swiss Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter said last weekend in justifying the deal.



    [ad_2]
    #Swiss #prosecutors #open #probe #UBS #takeover #Credit #Suisse
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.eu )