[ad_1]
Grimes has welcomed musicians to create new songs with her voice using Artificial Intelligence, saying she would split 50% of royalties on any successful AI-generated track that included her voice.
The Canadian singer, whose real name is Claire Boucher, tweeted that it was the βsame deal as I would with any artist I collab[orate] with. Feel free to use my voice without penalty,β she tweeted.
She said she was interested in being a βguinea pigβ and she thought βitβs cool to be fused with a machine and I like the idea of open sourcing all art and killing copyrightβ.
I’ll split 50% royalties on any successful AI generated song that uses my voice. Same deal as I would with any artist i collab with. Feel free to use my voice without penalty. I have no label and no legal bindings. pic.twitter.com/KIY60B5uqt
β ππ―π¦πͺπ’π° (@Grimezsz) April 24, 2023
The music industry is currently entering unparalleled territory as it tries to keep up with the implications of a spate of songs created by training AI to generate artistsβ voices.
Last week, Universal Music successfully petitioned TikTok, YouTube and Spotify to remove a track titled Heart On My Sleeve, which used AI vocals generated from their artists Drake and the Weeknd.
It was just one of several recently released tracks that featured AI-generated vocals based on Drake, who does not seem to be as enthused as Grimes. The rapper recently wrote: βThis is the final straw AI,β on an Instagram story, referring to a version of Ice Spiceβs song Munch that was released with a fake verse by him.
In a statement, the label said βthe training of generative AI using our artistsβ musicβ was βa violation of copyright lawβ. However, Universalβs position has not been tested in court, and it remains a legal grey area whether art that is created by a human, but which contains AI elements, can be copyrighted.
In October, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) warned that AI companies were violating copyrights en masse by using music to train their machines.
However, last month the US Copyright Office ruled that AI-generated art, including music, canβt be copyrighted as it is βnot the product of human authorshipβ.
On Twitter, Grimes wrote she is working on software βthat should simulate my voice wellβ, but would also consider releasing vocal tracks for people to use to train AI.
When asked what she would do if people used her voice to create racist or violent content, she wrote that she βmay do copyright takedowns ONLY for rly rly toxic lyricsβ or songs that were βanti-abortion or [something] like thatβ.
βThatβs the only rule… [I] donβt wanna be responsible for a Nazi anthem unless itβs somehow in jest, a la Producers I guess,β she said.
Grimes, who has two children with SpaceX founder and Twitter CEO Elon Musk, has explored the quandaries posed by AI in tracks such as Flesh Without Blood. In 2020, she collaborated with music company Endel to create an AI-generated lullaby for her son X Γ A-12.
βI think AI is great,β she told the New York Times. βCreatively, I think AI can replace humans. And so I think at some point, we will want to, as a species, have a discussion about how involved AI will be in art.β
[ad_2]
#Grimes #invites #people #voice #songs
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )