Footballer Achraf Hakimi’s world is rocked as his wife, Hiba Abouk, filed for divorce and demanded half of his property, several media reports stated.
However, in a surprising turn of events, the court informed her that her ‘millionaire’ husband legally owns nothing, as all his assets are registered under his mother’s name.
Achraf Hakimi, the Moroccan International and PSG player, received a staggering €1 million per month, but 80% of this amount is deposited into his mother, Mrs. Fatima’s account. The 24-year-old football star appears to have no property, cars, houses, jewelry, or even clothes registered in his name.
The couple began dating in 2018 when Hakimi was only 19 years old, and Abouk was 31. As they head towards separation, Abouk, now 36, anticipated receiving an equal share of Hakimi’s €70 million fortune. However, documents reveal that all of the assets are registered under his mother’s name, leaving Abouk with no legal claim to them.
In an unusual arrangement, whenever Hakimi needed something, he requested it from his mother, who then purchases it for him. This dynamic has allowed him to avoid registering any assets in his own name.
The divorce proceedings come on the heels of an investigation launched last month into allegations that the star defender molested a woman he had invited to his matrimonial home while his wife and family were in Dubai.
As the story unfolds, questions arise about the motivation behind Hakimi’s choice to keep all his assets under his mother’s name and the potential impact on the ongoing investigation and divorce settlement.
Footballer Achraf Hakimi’s world is rocked as his wife, Hiba Abouk, files for divorce and demands half of his property. However, in a surprising turn of events, the court informs her that her “millionaire” husband legally owns nothing, as all his assets are registered under his mother’s name.
Achraf Hakimi, the Moroccan International and PSG player, receives a staggering €1 million per month, but 80% of this amount is deposited into his mother, Mrs. Fatima’s account. The 24-year-old football star appears to have no property, cars, houses, jewelry, or even clothes registered in his name.
The couple began dating in 2018 when Hakimi was only 19 years old, and Abouk was 31. As they head towards separation, Abouk, now 36, anticipated receiving an equal share of Hakimi’s €70 million fortune. However, documents reveal that all of the assets are registered under his mother’s name, leaving Abouk with no legal claim to them.
In an unusual arrangement, whenever Hakimi needs something, he requests it from his mother, who then purchases it for him. This dynamic has allowed him to avoid registering any assets in his own name.
The divorce proceedings come on the heels of an investigation launched last month into allegations that the star defender molested a woman he had invited to his matrimonial home while his wife and family were in Dubai.
As the story unfolds, questions arise about the motivation behind Hakimi’s choice to keep all his assets under his mother’s name and the potential impact on the ongoing investigation and divorce settlement.
“There’s a transition going on in the administration,” said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus. “We were looking forward to developing a good relationship with Jeff Zients, but at this point, we’re not in that place yet. So we’re still working on it.”
Jayapal later added: “We’re getting to know each other, and I’ve been really pleased with how responsive and open they are.”
Inside and outside the administration, there is concern over whether Zients has the political instincts and Capitol Hill relationships to deftly navigate a crucial period ahead of Biden’s anticipated reelection run, according to interviews with 16 administration officials, lawmakers and others with knowledge of the internal White House dynamics, some of whom were granted anonymity for fear of retribution.
Every chief of staff faces critics and criticism, often from within the building. Klain endured the same. But Zients’ emergence provides an early test of whether someone without decades of Biden world experience can help the president navigate the political waters. It also will help illuminate whether someone without an extensive political background can manage one of Washington’s most crucial positions.
Zients has his defenders, who say it’s too early to judge and that the complaints have more to do with getting used to a new management style. They stress he is in constant contact with Democrats on the Hill.
But there are early signs that Zients himself recognizes the learning curve he’s up against. Whereas Klain routinely made his own policy and political recommendations to the president, Zients frequently brings in other senior advisers — including Steve Ricchetti and Anita Dunn.
Three administration officials with knowledge of the matter also have said Ricchetti now regularly sits in the daily chief of staff meetings that Biden used to hold one-on-one with Klain, though they stressed Zients gets solo time with the president, too.
White House officials said Zients bringing aides into meetings reflected his way of creating a more “inclusive” environment.
The White House did not make Zients available for comment. But in an email, Klain defended his successor: “What I’m hearing from old White House colleagues and from key allies on Capitol Hill is that Jeff is off to a great start — building on the progress of the past two years, with effective outreach and open communication.”
A longtime corporate executive who previously co-chaired Biden’s transition and directed the White House’s Covid response team, Zients also served in the Obama administration as director of the National Economic Council. He was tapped to bring his managerial skills to the broader day-to-day operations. But six weeks in, congressional Democrats say the decision making in the West Wing has grown more opaque — spurring confusion over policy priorities and debate over how much responsibility Zients is and should be carrying.
One adviser in close touch with a range of key House Democrats graded Zients’ first months on the job bluntly: “I would give him a C-,” the person said. “It’s a generous C-.”
There are signs that Zients is taking steps to shore up his standing among Hill allies. White House officials say he has done consistent outreach to the Hill in his first weeks, speaking with more than 50 lawmakers, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and progressives including Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
On Wednesday, Jayapal said Zients called and spoke with her for roughly 30 minutes on a number of caucus issues, including the expansion of overtime eligibility for workers. She said he has called before and that Zients also dropped in on her meeting last week with National Economic Council Director Lael Brainard.
Democrats acknowledged that much of the dissatisfaction may be the result of growing pains as White House operations adjust to Zients’ leadership style. While Klain was distinctly hands-on with nearly every issue — taking part in policy debates, staying in close touch with an array of lawmakers and advocacy groups, and occasionally frustrating aides with his demands and the bottlenecking of decisions — Zients has sought to bring more structure to the process.
That means meetings are more formal and decision making follows a more established procedure, compared to the culture that funneled nearly every development through Klain’s office. Zients — a former management consultant — has shortened White House meetings (often described as too lengthy during the Klain era) in an effort to boost efficiency, preferring to check in frequently with individual aides and teams for updates throughout the day.
“The White House is a quick-paced place and from Jeff on down, we are maximizing every minute,” deputy press secretary Andrew Bates said. “So if we have a 15-minute meeting, it’s because the meeting only needs to be 15 minutes. And if the meeting needs to be an hour, he’ll make it an hour.”
Zients also leans on his deputy, Natalie Quillian, for tasks like tracking the implementation of major legislation that Biden believes will underpin his case for reelection, four people with knowledge of the internal dynamics said.
“Ron was unique in his own talents and abilities around how busy and a whirling dervish of activity he could be,” said Faiz Shakir, an adviser to Sanders who kept in frequent touch with Klain. “[Zients] runs it as you would a CEO at a larger corporation: I have people for that, give them space.”
Five officials acknowledged changes and growing pains, but insisted both are a natural part of any major transition.
“When you have the leader leave and another person comes in, of course there’s change. Of course there’s a change in how people work, and organizations adapt to that,” Dunn, a senior Biden adviser, said in a phone interview Wednesday. “Change is not necessarily a bad thing. And it’s not necessarily an improvement from what happened before. It’s just different and they [Klein and Zients] are different, and they both have enormous strengths.”
Worries about Zients have been shaped by a series of White House decisions made shortly after the 56-year-old moved into his new role. On Zients’ second day, most House Democrats opposed a bill seeking to repeal a major revision of D.C.’s criminal code after the administration issued a statement that appeared to support the local overhaul.
But weeks later, Biden reversed his position, vowing on March 2 to sign the repeal if it reached his desk. The announcement upset House Democrats who felt they had taken a tough political vote for no reason. More infuriating, lawmakers and aides said, was the way the White House went about it.
Biden made no mention of his newfound support for the bill during a private meeting with House Democrats only the day before, nor had any White House officials offered preemptive warnings. It was only when Biden met with Senate Democrats the next day that he disclosed his plans. At the time, D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton said she learned about the news when asked by reporters during a Congressional Black Caucus press conference. And other fellow Democrats were left unsatisfied after they tried to press White House aides for more information as they read reports about Biden’s conversation with Senate Democrats.
Asked in the aftermath what members needed to hear from the White House, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) said the administration needed to have “some honest conversations with people who feel they walked the plank.”
Senior Biden aides admitted to a communication breakdown, blaming inexperience in the White House in dealing with veto threats. Zients has since ordered changes to the communication process, they said.
That puzzlement has only been compounded in recent weeks by lawmakers’ similar struggle to get answers over reports that Biden may reinstitute family detention at the southern border in a bid to limit migration. The prospect alarmed Latino lawmakers and immigration advocates, and came as the lawmakers have also openly criticized the administration’s proposal to clamp down on asylum eligibility.
Zients’ defenders downplayed the complaints, arguing that the shift from Klain was bound to be jarring for some. On top of that, his arrival coincided with a particularly busy period for the White House that prevented Zients from making the typical get-to-know-you rounds. Some Democrats also acknowledged that Biden’s priorities and outreach may need to shift as he positions himself for reelection.
“At the end of the day, as a Democrat, do you want a Democrat in the White House or not?” said Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.). “So you kind of have to swallow circumstances. We don’t like it. I don’t like it. But, you know, you just have to understand that reality.”
While Biden has taken positions of late that have left traditionally progressive groups in dismay — including the approval of a drilling project in Alaska that enraged environmental groups but thrilled labor unions — Zients has also overseen a relatively productive stretch. The president rolled out his latest budget proposal, turning it into a political cudgel against House Republicans, and he and his team are now in the midst of trying to avert a financial crisis after a pair of regional banks failed.
The sprint to stabilize the banking sector following Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse offered a clear example of the management skills that catapulted Zients into the highest ranks of government, allies said.
“It was a race to get things done before the market opened, and he knows this stuff. He’s good at it,” said one Zients supporter who was in touch with him during the effort. “There was nothing that was not decisive and clear.”
More broadly, some in the White House who chafed under Klain’s leadership view Zients as a welcome change, describing an environment that’s become more professional and influenced less by the chief of staff’s own day-to-day priorities.
On the Hill, some Democrats said they’ve felt the positive effects of having new blood at the top of the White House. Rep. Ann Kuster, the chair of the moderate New Democrat Coalition, said Zients called her on his first day as chief of staff and has remained in close touch.
Jayapal said one element of her relationship with Klain she enjoyed was “just to be able to call or text when I need to. And so far that’s been working pretty well” with Zients, too. She called her relationship with the new chief of staff a work in progress, but said she’s eager to see it improve.
“Ron did say to me, ‘Give him a chance, Congresswoman. You didn’t know me either,’” Jayapal said.
Sarah Ferris contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
#Jeff #Zients #discovers #thanklessness #White #House #chief #staff #gig
( With inputs from : www.politico.com )
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a longtime advocate for the forced breakup of the largest tech firms, blamed Washington’s “weakening of financial rules” for SVB’s collapse. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a reliable critic of most things the tech industry does, blamed “bank executives” for SVB’s failure and praised the government’s bailout of depositors.
Totally quiet were Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), the key driver behind last cycle’s failed tech antitrust push, as well as Reps. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) or Ken Buck (R-Colo.), who were responsible for identical antitrust legislation in the House.
This is not the reception a lot of Valley insiders were expecting. In fact, a big theme on tech-investor Twitter over the weekend was that Washington would use — or perhaps was already using — their industry as a political football.
“I believe that if Silicon Valley Bank were instead called Farmers Bank Of Santa Clara (they bank a lot of winegrowers!) we would have had this easily resolved,” OpenAI CEO Sam Altman tweeted on Sunday. “Unfortunately it became somewhat political.”
The tech investors’ fears proved unfounded: Two days after the bank’s failure, the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Department and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced a bailout for SVB’s depositors.
How’d they get it so wrong?
Margaret O’Mara, chair of American history at the University of Washington and an expert on the interplay of politics and tech, said the VCs misread the room — and not for the first time.
“This kind of adversarial, David and Goliath relationship that I think some of these tech moguls would like to set up [with Washington] — that’s not how it works,” O’Mara said. “It’s not how it’s worked in practice, and it’s not what’s going on today.”
There was at least one exception to the general trend of politicians giving the tech industry a pass — Vivek Ramaswamy, a longshot candidate in the GOP presidential primary, accused Silicon Valley of “pushing the idea that SVB depositors need to be rescued to prevent a run on other banks” and called for an “‘Occupy Silicon Valley’ movement” if a bailout materialized.
But neither lawmakers nor the many advocacy groups regularly critical of the tech platforms claimed the industry was at fault (and that’s despite emerging evidence that suggests tech founders and CEOs may have goaded each other into a bank run through a series of private Slack messages).
O’Mara said intensifying feelings of suspicion and contempt for the federal government in Silicon Valley caused a group of what she called “extremely online venture capitalists” to believe Washington would blame and punish the tech industry for SVB’s collapse.
“There’s always been a bit of, ‘Oh, the government is going to come in and ruin the innovative magic that made Silicon Valley what it is. Government bureaucrats don’t understand what we do,’’’ O’Mara said. “It’s taken on this kind of culture war tone in recent years.”
While that perception is largely inaccurate — O’Mara said light regulations, beneficial tax policies and a flood of federal R&D dollars have “made Silicon Valley what it is” — she said it persists because tech executives and investors largely fail to recognize (or understand) Washington’s role.
“That’s another hallmark, unfortunately, of the Valley,” said O’Mara. She noted that many of the tech industry’s leading lights are programmers with a “savant-like focus, who have done nothing but that all their lives.”
“They have had so little interest in, or respect for, regulatory mechanisms that they actually don’t know these things,” O’Mara said. “And they presume they’re dysfunctional.”
When asked whether she thinks the bailout will force the industry’s top investors to rethink their view of Washington, O’Mara’s answer was succinct.
“No,” she said.
[ad_2]
#Washington #discovers #limits #techlash
( With inputs from : www.politico.com )
Palestinian nurse Elias al-Ashqar next to a billboard bearing the obituary of his father Abdelhadi al-Ashqar, February 24, 2023. Photo: AFP
A Palestinian nurse treating patients injured in the deadly Israeli military raid on the city of Nablus on Wednesday was shocked when he announced the death of a man, only to later discover it was his father, local media reported.
“This is my father!” nurse Elias al-Ashqar yelled inside the emergency room of Al-Najah Hospital in Nablus, in a harrowing moment captured on video.
As per media reports, when Elias rushed to the emergency room and tried to resuscitate two of the injured without looking at their faces.
إلياس الأشقر ممرّض في نابلس ركض مع زميله لمحاولة إنقاذ مصابين برصاص الاحتلال، وشرعا بإنعاش مسنّ مصاب دون النظر في وجهه، وعندما أعلن طبيب عن ارتقائه، فكشف إلياس عن وجه المُسّن وصرح: هذا أبوي هذا أبوي pic.twitter.com/MDevjicE2O
“When all attempts failed and the time of death was announced, Elias looked at the man’s face and yelled out my name at the top of his lungs: Aswad, this is my father!” Ahmed al-Aswad, the chief of the cardiac intensive care and Ashqar’s close friend, told Middle East Eye.
Sixty-five-year-old Abdelhadi al-Ashqar was returning from prayer in Nablus when he was caught up in the Israeli raid, AFP reported.
Abdelhadi was one of eleven Palestinians killed, most of them civilians. More than 100 others were injured.
For several months the occupation army has been pursuing the Palestinian armed group “The Lions’ Den”, which is based in the old city of Nablus.
Cairo: Egypt’s renowned archaeologist Zahi Hawass has announced the discovery of “important tombs hosting a 4300-year-old mummy” in the Saqqara necropolis near the Pyramids of Giza.
“The mummy is the oldest and most complete unroyal mummy found in Egypt to date,” Xinhua news agency quoted Hawass as saying in a press conference on Thursday.
The mummy of a man, Hekashepes, covered with gold leaf, was found inside a large rectangular limestone sarcophagus in a room located under a 15-metre-deep shaft, the archaeologist said.
He added that many stone vessels were seen around the sarcophagus, which was completely sealed when the mission discovered it.
“The oldest mummy is part of the important discovery of a group of tombs that date back to the fifth and sixth dynasties of the Old Kingdom,” said Hawass, the director of the Egyptian excavation team working with the Supreme Council of Antiquities at Gisr el-Mudir area in Saqqara.
He explained that new discoveries indicated that the site comprises a large cemetery.
According to Hawass, a tomb that belonged to Khnumdjedef, an inspector of the officials, a supervisor of the nobles, and a priest in the pyramid complex of Unas, the last king of the fifth dynasty, is the most important one among the new discoveries.
Khnumdjedef’s tomb is decorated with inscriptions of daily life.
The second largest tomb belonged to Meri, who was a keeper of the secrets and assistant of the great leader of the palace.
The mission also found a third tomb for Messi, who is a priest of King Pepi I Meryre, the third king of the Sixth Dynasty of Egypt, and nine beautiful statues, which include one for the priest and his wife, several servant statues, and statues representing individuals.
Hawass added that the mission uncovered another 10-metre-deep shaft comprising a set of beautiful wooden statues, three stone statues representing a person named Fetek, an offering table, and a stone sarcophagus that contained his mummy.
The Egyptian mission also found many amulets, stone vessels, tools for daily life, and statues of the funerary deity Ptah-Sokar at the site, he added.
(Except for the headline, the story has not been edited by Siasat staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
