Tag: differences

  • Differences between govt, judiciary can’t be construed as confrontation: Rijiju

    Differences between govt, judiciary can’t be construed as confrontation: Rijiju

    [ad_1]

    Chennai: Asserting that differences were inevitable in a democracy, Union Minister for Law and Justice Kiran Rijiju said differences between government and judiciary cannot be construed as confrontation. He denied any clash between the government and the judiciary.

    The Union Law minister was speaking after inaugurating the chief judicial magistrate court at Myladuthurai. Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud and Acting Chief Justice of Madras High Court, Justice T Raja, were present on the occasion.

    While pointing out at some media reports on differences between the government and judiciary, Rijju said that in a democracy differences were bound to be there and added that these are due to difference in outlook but stated that conflicting positions should not be there.

    He said, “This does not mean confrontation between government and the Supreme Court or legislature and judiciary. This is not confrontation but only differences which are inevitable in the largest democracy in the world.”

    The Union Law minister said that the central government would support the judiciary to be independent and added that the bench and the bar are the two sides of the same coin.

    He said that one cannot work without the other and added that courts should have proper decorum and conducive atmosphere. Rijjiju said that the country is not ruled by a dictatorial king and added that the differences of opinion cannot be construed as a crisis in Indian democracy.

    The minister said that the two bodies can criticise each other but in national interest all should be one. The minister lauded the courts in Tamil Nadu for their excellent performance during pandemic and delivering judgments. He said that the judicial infrastructure in Tamil Nadu was much better than many other states.

    The minister said that during the previous year, Rs 9000 crore was allocated for the district courts and other courts in the state of Tamil Nadu and added that his department was pushing hard for the utilisation of the funds so that more funds could be sought.

    He said that the government was for the Indian judiciary to completely go paperless in the coming days. The minister said that in the coming days due to technological advancement everything could be synchronised and the judge need not postpone the cases for want of evidence. He said that works are under progress and added that a major solution for pendency of cases was in the near future.

    The minister also said that the executive and judiciary should work together to clear the pendency of cases. Rijjiju said, “In India, each judge is hearing 50 to 60 cases a day and if I had to deal with so many cases, mental pressure would be tremendous.”

    He said that due to the heavy influx of cases, there were criticisms that judges were not able to deliver justice and added that this was not true.

    The minister pointed out that even as cases were disposed of faster, the number of cases that were coming up for hearing was higher. He said that the only solution was to strengthen the Indian judiciary and to have better infrastructure and better mechanism.

    He called upon all the courts to use Tamil language in all court proceedings in the state and added that with the use of technological advancements, Tamil which was a classical language can one day be even used in Supreme Court of India.

    The minister also said that his ministry was developing a common core vocabulary where Indian languages will have certain common usages, that are purely technical in nature. He said that this was to ensure that common people receive orders in their respective languages.

    [ad_2]
    #Differences #govt #judiciary #construed #confrontation #Rijiju

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Agreement with Iran doesn’t mean resolving all differences: Saudi finance minister

    Agreement with Iran doesn’t mean resolving all differences: Saudi finance minister

    [ad_1]

    Riyadh: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister Faisal bin Farhan made it clear that the agreement to resume diplomatic relations with Iran does not mean “resolving all outstanding differences between the two countries,” Anadolu Agency reported.

    Saudi foreign minister said in remarks to Arabic daily Asharq Al-Awsat on Monday that the agreement came “under the auspices and mediation of China, after several rounds of talks over the past two years in both Iraq and the Sultanate of Oman.”

    However, he adds, “Our reaching this agreement, which will lead to the resumption of political relations, does not mean that we have reached a solution to all outstanding differences between our two countries, but rather it is evidence of our common desire to resolve them through dialogue.”

    Regarding his upcoming visit to Tehran, the minister said, “I look forward to meeting Iran’s foreign minister soon based on what was agreed upon, and we will prepare to resume diplomatic relations between our two countries during the next two months.”

    On Friday, Saudi Arabia and Iran announced the resumption of diplomatic relations between the two countries, and the reopening of embassies within two months, following Chinese-sponsored talks in Beijing according to a tripartite statement of the three countries.

    In January 2016, Saudi Arabia severed its relations with Iran, following attacks on the Riyadh embassy in Tehran and its consulate in Mashhad, in protest against the kingdom’s execution of Saudi Shiite cleric Nimr Baqir al-Nimr, on charges including terrorism.

    [ad_2]
    #Agreement #Iran #doesnt #resolving #differences #Saudi #finance #minister

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Can disaster diplomacy after tragic earthquakes bridge political differences?

    Can disaster diplomacy after tragic earthquakes bridge political differences?

    [ad_1]

    Ankara: Natural disasters usually work to unite people to put aside political differences, and it’s been the case for the deadly earthquakes that struck Turkey and Syria.

    The catastrophe may also have an impact on international relations. Countries at odds with Turkey and Syria have rallied in solidarity with the two quake-hit countries, sending batches of aid and rescue teams, Xinhua news agency reported.

    However, it’s unclear whether this dynamic will continue when the disaster has passed or whether new understandings and bridges will be established, experts said.

    Over 9,800 rescue personnel from 70 countries have rushed to southeastern Turkey after it was jolted on February 6 by two powerful earthquakes that have killed 31,643 and wounded over 80,000, according to the latest official toll announced on Monday.

    This is the worst natural disaster that Turkiye has witnessed. An earthquake in eastern Turkey in 1939 had killed 30,000 people.

    Some countries stick out on the long list more than others, such as Greece, Armenia and Cyprus, despite having had difficult or tense relations with Ankara over decades.

    However, all of these old rivals have set aside their animosity and given helping hands at a time of disaster.

    “Natural disasters are indeed brief moments of conciliation in bilateral disputes. In the case of Turkey and Greece they are both earthquake-prone countries and have come to the aid of one another many times, allowing for reconciliation,” Batu Coskun, an independent political risk analyst, told Xinhua.

    “Usually when the crisis subsides, bilateral tensions reassert themselves, though with less severity,” he pointed out.

    Earthquakes that struck both Turkey and Greece in 1999 gave rise to “earthquake diplomacy” and improved previously tense ties between the two nations. Before tensions reemerged, the post-quake mood persisted for a few years.

    Ankara and Athens have decades-old feuds and have repeatedly come to the brink of war. Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Dendias arrived on Sunday for a visit to Turkey’s disaster-struck Adana province, where he was warmly greeted by his Turkish counterpart Mevlut Cavusoglu who praised Greek relief efforts.

    “We do not need to wait for natural disasters to improve our relations,” Dendias was quoted as saying by the local press.

    Turkey has not had diplomatic or commercial ties with Armenia since the 1990s. The two countries also reconnected for the first time in decades in the wake of the earthquakes.

    A border gate between the two countries has been opened for the first time in more than three decades to allow aid for victims of the devastating earthquakes in southern Turkey, according to the semi-official Anadolu Agency.

    “The land border with Armenia being opened is a significant milestone. Likely, this event will become a major motivator for both countries to normalize relations and exchange ambassadors,” Coskun said.

    He added that in the post-crisis period when foreign policy again becomes a priority for the government after disaster relief, “we will see the impact of this.”

    Israel has also sent aid to Turkey. The two countries have improved their relations recently after over a decade of discord.

    Tulin Daloglu, a journalist and foreign policy analyst, said that Turkey should take lessons from this tragedy and try to move to a softer line in foreign policy towards some countries it has problems with.

    She specifically mentioned Sweden, whose NATO membership bid has met with objections from Ankara over security issues.

    “Yet, Sweden immediately rushed to assist Turkey in the aftermath of the disaster,” Daloglu said, adding that such an event can change the way a country is seen by the public opinion of the host country.

    [ad_2]
    #disaster #diplomacy #tragic #earthquakes #bridge #political #differences

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Treasury study shows stark racial differences in tax breaks, credits

    Treasury study shows stark racial differences in tax breaks, credits

    [ad_1]

    tax filing 37097

    The new report is part of a push by the agency to examine how race intersects with the tax system.

    “Given the increased reliance on the tax system as a means of delivering benefits in recent decades, it is critical that we understand how tax policies affect different families and whether policies implemented via the tax code are reaching all families,” agency officials said Friday in a blog post.

    The IRS does not know the race of filers so Treasury developed a method of estimating the likely race of the person listed first on a return based on other information. It focused on White people, Black people and Hispanic people “due to high levels of uncertainty in estimates for other groups.”

    “This new research provides evidence of the disparities in the benefits of tax expenditures by race and ethnicity, but more work remains to be done to understand the reasons for these disparities and their implications,” the Treasury said.

    “Differences in income, wealth, job characteristics, employer, family composition, access to credit, and so forth may give rise to these disparities in conjunction with the structure of the tax code, but more work is needed to determine which differences contribute the most.”

    [ad_2]
    #Treasury #study #shows #stark #racial #differences #tax #breaks #credits
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )