Tag: Care

  • Blue states put the brakes on health care for undocumented immigrants

    Blue states put the brakes on health care for undocumented immigrants

    [ad_1]

    gun laws connecticut 18150

    “It frustrates me because it’s not based on any kind of policy decision other than dollars,” said Connecticut state Rep. Jillian Gilchrest, a Democrat who is spearheading a bill to expand Medicaid to all undocumented kids this year. “The budget document outlines your priorities as a state. As we’re looking at all the various things we need to fund, this should be top of mind.”

    The intra-party debate comes as the Biden administration and Democrats at the national level grapple with how to expand health care access for noncitizens — who make up just 6 percent of the U.S. population but 23 percent of the uninsured — in a divided Congress.

    Hopes of a public health insurance option, a hallmark of Biden’s presidential campaign, were dashed during debates over what became the Inflation Reduction Act. Instead, House Republicans just passed legislation that would add work requirements to Medicaid — a move that could leave an additional 600,000 Americans uninsured, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

    Against that federal backdrop, progressive state lawmakers are trying to take up the mantle, using their own dollars to push policies for undocumented immigrants that were until recently outside mainstream Democratic thinking and inch toward universal coverage.

    “The idea that health care is something everybody should have access to has shifted in the last decade or so,” said Kelly Whitener, an associate professor at the Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy’s Center for Children and Families. “How to get there is the hard part — and I think the cost barrier is a real one.”

    In Nevada, Democrats have slashed a $300 million proposal to expand Medicaid to all undocumented immigrants to a $90 million policy that would cover those up to age 26 — with further cuts on the table. Even if legislators can agree on the price tag, Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo has not said whether he will sign it into law.

    In Minnesota, where Democrats control the governor’s mansion and both chambers of the legislature for the first time in a decade, lawmakers are debating whether to extend state-funded Medicaid coverage to undocumented children or spend an extra $39 million to cover all undocumented immigrants as they balance a host of other priorities, such as K-12 schools, affordable housing and child care.

    And in Connecticut, lawmakers in 2021 expanded Medicaid coverage for undocumented children up to age 8. Last year, they expanded the program to age 12. While a bill was introduced this year that would have allowed coverage up to age 26, costing the state about $15 million a year, it was whittled down to age 15, at a cost of $3 million.

    Immigrant advocates — frustrated with the state’s incremental approach to expanding coverage — are pushing in the final weeks of the legislative session for an extra $5 million they say would allow them to cover all kids up to age 18. Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont, a Democrat, said during a Wednesday forum that he was comfortable with extending the program to age 15.

    “Well, the advocates are saying, ‘Not enough,’” Lamont said. “I get it. That’s their job, but I think we’re making progress every day.”

    Democrats who favor incremental coverage expansion argue they are being methodical and chafe at the accusation that it signals a lack of political will.

    “That’s just flat out nonsense,” said Connecticut state Sen. Cathy Osten, the Democrat who co-chairs the legislature’s appropriations committee. “We just want to roll out the program correctly.”

    Illinois offers a cautionary tale for those concerned about costs. The number of undocumented adults who have signed up for Medicaid under the state’s coverage expansions exceeded the actuarial firm Milliman’s projections, according to the Department of Healthcare and Family Services. And, according to the state’s most recent public data, between March 2022 and February 2023, the program paid nearly twice — $189 million more — in claims for covered adults than Milliman projected, the department said.

    “There’s historically been an assumption that takeup would be slow and low, that people won’t necessarily know that coverage is available, or if they are aware that coverage is newly available, they might be reluctant to enroll,” Whitener said. “But it is not playing out that way in every state.”

    Beyond Illinois, California, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington state have all expanded Medicaid to undocumented children. Some of those states also provide benefits to adults, either through Medicaid or the state health insurance exchange. Undocumented immigrants, as well as legal immigrants who have been in the country for less than five years, do not qualify for federal Medicaid money.

    And Utah’s GOP legislature this year passed a bill expanding health coverage to undocumented kids through its Children’s Health Insurance Program after it was amended to include a $4.5 million cap, data review requirements and a sunset clause. Rep. Jim Dunnigan, a Republican, said he helped kill the proposal last year, but after extensive conversations with the bill’s Democratic sponsor, he co-sponsored the legislation this spring and shepherded it through the House, where it passed 64-7, with 52 Republicans in support.

    “Some of my more conservative colleagues said … ‘If you structure it properly, we have a heart. We have a heart for kids,’” Dunnigan said. “Frankly, I was surprised at some of them. But I give them credit because they were willing to listen to what the bill was actually trying to accomplish.”

    Proponents of the policies argue that while undocumented coverage expansions require significant ongoing funding, the dollars represent only a small part of their state’s budget and will save money in the long run by encouraging people to receive preventive care and keep people out of emergency rooms, reducing uncompensated care costs. They also argue the move will bring equity to mixed-status families where some people are eligible for health care and others are not, and that immigrants pay taxes that go to fund these types of programs.

    But some lawmakers — in addition to having concerns about the cost — fear that opening up coverage will lead to an influx of undocumented immigrants from surrounding states, though several studies examining the so-called “magnet effect” of health care benefits have found that people move primarily for better housing, family reasons and jobs. They also argue that expanding the program too quickly could burden the state’s health care infrastructure and create problems that could leave people without coverage.

    In Maryland, Democratic leadership scuttled a bill this year that would have allowed undocumented immigrants to purchase plans through the state’s health insurance exchange, saying the issue needed more study.

    “What you have is a group of people who have identified a solution to a part of the problem and, I think because of their passion and their desire to see the health care needs met, they don’t necessarily understand why we want to look at all of the options available to us,” Maryland Senate Finance Committee Chair Melony Griffith, a Democrat, told reporters last month. “We want to make sure we’re meeting the needs of the most vulnerable, and getting the most out of the investments the state makes.”

    [ad_2]
    #Blue #states #put #brakes #health #care #undocumented #immigrants
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Koochie-Koo Cute Plastic Portable Baby Care Kit Nursery Kids Healthcare and Grooming Set Manicure and Pedicure Accessories for New Born Babies Toddler Kids (Pack of 10, Blue)

    Koochie-Koo Cute Plastic Portable Baby Care Kit Nursery Kids Healthcare and Grooming Set Manicure and Pedicure Accessories for New Born Babies Toddler Kids (Pack of 10, Blue)

    41vrVL96UcL51f 8+8FkAL41NsYmHvpZL51kcykMUv2L518 YQ8nZYL31uwdMKP 0L31i9foYZ5bL41ei2wysfVL
    Price: [price_with_discount]
    (as of [price_update_date] – Details)

    ISRHEWs
    [ad_1]

    baby comb
    COMPACT & LIGHTWEIGHT: The kit is handy, compact & ultra-lightweight to carry wherever you go. This contains all the items that a baby require to look beautiful and keep them hygienic.
    SAFE AND QUALITY MATERIAL: The grooming kit is made of quality BPA free material to keep the baby safe. The bristles are made of soft nylon so that it does not hurt your kid. Quality stainless steel blades which are rust free and durable. Scissors comes with a cap to keep them hygienic & protect baby’s hands and keep them well groomed.
    PERFECT GIFT FOR BABIES & PARENTS: Every piece of baby care kit is having separate beneficial use. It’s a perfect gift set for your friends and family having babies.
    ERGONOMIC DESIGN: Ergonomic design and anti-skid grip of the products provide perfect option to the parents to operate safely.

    [ad_2]
    #KoochieKoo #Cute #Plastic #Portable #Baby #Care #Kit #Nursery #Kids #Healthcare #Grooming #Set #Manicure #Pedicure #Accessories #Born #Babies #Toddler #Kids #Pack #Blue

  • G20 Summit: Secy Health reviews health care preparedness in North Kashmir

    G20 Summit: Secy Health reviews health care preparedness in North Kashmir

    [ad_1]

    Srinagar, May 5 (GNS): Secretary Health & Medical Education, Bhupinder Kumar today visited various health care facilities of North Kashmir and reviewed preparedness of the department for the forthcoming G20 summit.

    The Secretary was accompanied by Director Health Services, Kashmir, Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Rather and other Divisional and District Level Health officers during the visit.

    The Secretary, during the visit, inspected facilities at PHC Gulmarg, SDH Tangmarg, PHC Narbal, SDH Magam and RIHFW Dhobiwan.

    He took a detailed review of the upgraded health facility and laid strict directions to the constructing agency to complete the works as per the deadline.

    While inspecting the other health facilities, the Secretary expressed satisfaction over the status of logistics, human resource and equipments that have been augmented in view of the upcoming G20 summit.

    He gave on spot directions to the Director Health Services Kashmir to further improve health care facilities at these facilities in view of the G20 summit.

    The Secretary also emphasised on having fool proof well-coordinated system at the health care centres for smooth functioning of health care services during the summit.

    On this occasion, Director Health Services Kashmir also apprised the Secretary about the status of health care delivery system and status of completion of various works as per the deadlines framed by the higher authorities.(GNS)

    [ad_2]
    #G20 #Summit #Secy #Health #reviews #health #care #preparedness #North #Kashmir

    ( With inputs from : thegnskashmir.com )

  • Florida Legislature votes to ban gender-affirming care for minors

    Florida Legislature votes to ban gender-affirming care for minors

    [ad_1]

    florida legislature 68095

    The legislation the House approved on a 83-28 vote, SB 254, is less restrictive than previous versions of the measure. One of those versions sought to bar private insurance companies from covering gender-affirming care to minors and adults and forbid any changes to gender on birth certificates for transgender individuals.

    But the sponsor of the House bill, state Rep. Randy Fine (R-Palm Bay), said he’ll revisit those provisions during Florida’s next annual legislative session.

    “We cannot let perfect be the enemy of good,” Fine said. “There are certainly things we wanted in our bill and there’s always next year.”

    The measure marks the latest bill the Florida Legislature passed focusing on the transgender community. On Wednesday, GOP lawmakers approved a bill that ban school employees from asking students for their preferred pronouns and restricts school staff from sharing their pronouns with students if they “do not correspond” with their sex. They also passed a bill that makes it a misdemeanor trespassing offense for someone to use bathrooms in government buildings and schools that don’t align with their sex at birth.

    DeSantis, who is expected to announce a White House bid in the coming weeks, has publicly objected to gender-affirming care and said doctors who perform such related surgeries should be sued. His administration last year blocked state-subsidized health care from paying for treatments of transgender people while Florida medical boards also banned transgender minors from receiving gender-affirming care.

    The state actions banning Medicaid payments and minors for receiving gender-affirming care are currently facing separate lawsuits in federal court.

    The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association support gender-affirming care for adults and adolescents. But medical experts said gender-affirming care for children rarely, if ever, includes surgery. Instead, doctors are more likely to recommend counseling, social transitioning and hormone replacement therapy.

    Democrats said Thursday that the bill banning minors from receiving gender-affirming care will hurt children diagnosed with gender dysphoria and will lead to transgender people being alienated in Florida.

    “Trans people are no different because they are humans too,” state Rep. Jennifer “Rita” Harris (D-Orlando) said. “Their existence is valid, and they’re no more likely to commit a crime or seek to hurt someone than anyone else.”

    [ad_2]
    #Florida #Legislature #votes #ban #genderaffirming #care #minors
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Opposition parties care for OBCs, Dalits only when out of power: Dinesh

    Opposition parties care for OBCs, Dalits only when out of power: Dinesh

    [ad_1]

    Lucknow: Senior BJP leader Dinesh Sharma hit out at the opposition parties in UP on Thursday for demanding a caste-based census, asserting that they care for the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Dalits only when they are removed from power.

    Targeting the Samajwadi Party, Sharma said their leaders should be asked why they did not start a caste-based census when they were in power in Uttar Pradesh for “so many years”. This, he added, would clearly show how much they care for the backward community.

    In recent days, the Samajwadi Party and the Congress have made a strong pitch for a caste census.

    MS Education Academy

    “When Raju Pal was killed, Umesh Pal was killed, Sandeep Nishad, the gunner of Umesh Pal, who was also from a backward community, was killed, Samajwadi Party and Congress remained silent and did not utter a word in favour of them. Instead they shed their tears in favour of the mafia,” the former deputy chief minister alleged.

    Raju Pal, an MLA, was killed allegedly by gangster-politician Atiq Ahmad and his gang members in 2005. Umesh Pal a key witness in the murder case was gunned down with his two security personnel in February this year by Ahmad’s gang in Prayagraj.

    Ahmad and his brother Ashraf, who were in police custody in connection with the Umesh Pal murder case, were shot dead by three assailants outside a hospital on April 15. The three assailants were arrested.

    Sharma also said that the BJP promotes mayors who perform better.

    Citing his own example, he said he remained the mayor of Lucknow for 11 years and then he was made the vice president of the BJP and he was also made the deputy chief minister of Uttar Pradesh.

    Similarly, he added, Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis too served as Nagpur mayor before being promoted. Fadnavis also served as the chief minister of Maharashtra from 2014 to 2019.

    Baby Rani Maurya, who was the mayor of Agra, was made the Uttarakhand governor from August 2018 to September 2021, Sharma said.

    “If mayors do good work they eventually get promoted in the party and government,” he said.

    Polling for the urban local bodies in the state is slated in two phases – on May 4 and May 11.

    The counting of votes will be held on May 13.

    [ad_2]
    #Opposition #parties #care #OBCs #Dalits #power #Dinesh

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Koochie-Koo Cute Plastic Portable Baby Care Kit Nursery Kids Healthcare and Grooming Set Manicure and Pedicure Accessories for New Born Babies Toddler Kids (Pack of 10, Pink)

    Koochie-Koo Cute Plastic Portable Baby Care Kit Nursery Kids Healthcare and Grooming Set Manicure and Pedicure Accessories for New Born Babies Toddler Kids (Pack of 10, Pink)

    41i0jKItgOS51MkFogPanL41ei2wysfVL41pn7Ru4a3L31PU0RobqSS31uwdMKP 0L31i9foYZ5bL51f 8+8FkAL41NsYmHvpZL
    Price: [price_with_discount]
    (as of [price_update_date] – Details)

    ISRHEWs
    [ad_1]

    baby comb
    COMPACT & LIGHTWEIGHT: The kit is handy, compact & ultra-lightweight to carry wherever you go. This contains all the items that a baby require to look beautiful and keep them hygienic.
    SAFE AND QUALITY MATERIAL: The grooming kit is made of quality BPA free material to keep the baby safe. The bristles are made of soft nylon so that it does not hurt your kid.Quality stainless steel blades which are rust free and durable. Scissors comes with a cap to keep them hygienic & protect baby’s hands and keep them well groomed.
    PERFECT GIFT FOR BABIES & PARENTS: Every piece of baby care kit is having separate beneficial use. It’s a perfect gift set for your friends and family having babies.
    ERGONOMIC DESIGN: Ergonomic design and anti-skid grip of the products provide perfect option to the parents to operate safely.

    [ad_2]
    #KoochieKoo #Cute #Plastic #Portable #Baby #Care #Kit #Nursery #Kids #Healthcare #Grooming #Set #Manicure #Pedicure #Accessories #Born #Babies #Toddler #Kids #Pack #Pink

  • More care at home could save Medicare, lawmakers believe

    More care at home could save Medicare, lawmakers believe

    [ad_1]

    20230201 natural resources 16 francis 14

    The sponsors and industry backers say that by allowing Medicare to pay for at-home care for more patients, Congress can reduce expensive hospitalizations and help stabilize Medicare’s teetering finances. “When you look at the numbers and demands on Medicare in the years on the horizon, we need to innovate,” Smith said.

    The legislation would create a new Medicare benefit allowing certain beneficiaries not eligible for Medicaid to have a home health worker for up to 12 hours a week. It would facilitate house calls by allowing doctors to receive a monthly payment, in place of the existing fee-for-service structure. And it would broaden reimbursement for home-based services, including dialysis, lab tests and infusions.

    The bill would also task the Department of Health and Human Services with studying additional procedures that could move to the home, such as X-rays.

    Consulting firm McKinsey estimated last year that more than $250 billion worth of care in Medicare and Medicare Advantage could shift to the home over three years, including primary care, emergency visits, long-term care, infusions and acute care at home.

    The timing is fortuitous. The pandemic forced providers to move more care to the home and created momentum for a long-term shift. Many elderly people embraced the change. It also spawned innovation in the private sector, as venture capitalists poured money into telehealth and at-home care startups.

    The federal and state governments are “the single-biggest payer of long-term care in this country,” Dingell said. “It’s institutionally focused, period. That’s not where most people want to be. They want to be in the home in their own setting with people they know and love.”

    But even as cash flows into the sector and patient demand for at-home care rises, health economists say it’s not clear this future is imminent.

    ‘Hard to know what the total costs might be’

    While advocates tout potential cost savings, there’s scant data to back up those claims. How much money the changes would cost or save remains a crucial question as lawmakers look to rein in health care spending.

    “There is potential for cost savings,” said Rachel Werner, executive director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, but Werner also said the package is difficult to assess as a whole.

    “The cost implications probably vary across the different provisions and it’s hard to know what the total costs might be,” she said.

    “Among the proposed programs, the one for which there will be the biggest demand is personal care services, which will be expensive and raises questions about whether there will be overall cost savings,” Werner said.

    Werner expects that personal care services — help with daily activities — would cost, rather than save money, in part because of what economists call the “woodwork effect.” When presented with the opportunity to get at-home help, people who weren’t previously paying for services come out of the woodwork to get it.

    Robert Burke, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine, said he was “intrigued” by personal care services’ inclusion in the bill. Those services could be especially useful for older adults leaving the hospital who need a combination of skilled home care and help with nonmedical needs.

    But while fewer stays at skilled nursing facilities may offset costs, Burke said the 12-hours-a-week of personal care the legislation outlined isn’t likely to work. A better approach would offer more care up front and less support over time, he suggested.

    Supporters of the package argue that expanding payment for personal care services could prevent costly hospital readmissions.

    Beyond cost, Werner, Burke and other analysts questioned whether there are sufficient workers to execute the vision.

    “I am concerned we lack the workforce to do it effectively or to scale the programs to have a meaningful impact,” Werner said.

    The ratio between home care workers and people who need services is worsening, according to a study Werner published this week in Health Affairs. The number of workers per 100 participants in Medicaid’s home and community-based services programs fell by 11.6 percent between 2013 and 2019, a trend that suggests it might be hard for Medicare patients to find home health aides.

    Technology like remote monitoring and telehealth could scale certain services. But others, like labs, diagnostic testing and at-home primary care, need skilled workers to carry out, in person, Burke noted.

    Others said the success of the lawmakers’ vision depends on execution and could be better or worse than existing care models.

    “It could help or exacerbate [workforce shortages],” said Julian Harris, former health care team lead at the White House Office of Management and Budget under former President Barack Obama and CEO of ConcertoCare, which cares for patients with complex conditions in the home. “We will likely have challenges as the Baby Boomers continue to age into Medicare with staffing and care needs of patients who want to receive care in the home with some of our legacy approaches.”

    The legislation would provide grants to organizations like health systems and home health agencies to build the workforce and create a task force for nursing certification standards for home care, which could result in a larger supply of workers. The Biden administration also recently directed HHS to look into regulations and guidance to improve home-care jobs.

    Dingell said paying health care workers more would help address these issues, touting her legislation introduced last month that aims to boost wages via more funding.

    Finally, there’s the question of cost-shifting, and whether moving care into the home will ultimately transfer labor costs to family members as they take on additional hours of informal caretaking.

    “Across most of these, I would expect increased caregiver burden,” Werner said.

    Supporters of the legislation contend that caregivers actually would feel more supported in this model, given the extra technology and supporting staff in the home that wouldn’t otherwise be there.

    ‘The pandemic showed us it is possible’

    While some health economists are skeptical of the House bill’s promises, a growing lineup of health care companies are enthused.

    Moving Health Home, a coalition of tech-enabled home care companies including Best Buy’s Current Health, health system Intermountain and dialysis provider DaVita, has backed the push. It’s a sister organization of the Alliance for Connected Care, a prominent telehealth lobbying group.

    Both groups are led by Krista Drobac, a lobbyist who once worked for the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under Obama.

    Drobac’s groups see moving care into the home as a way to improve patients’ outcomes, reduce costs and bolster access. The organization points to Morning Consult polling commissioned by home health care leaders showing that about three quarters of Democrats and three in five Republicans say the federal government should prioritize boosting access to care in the home.

    “Seniors and their caregivers want the option to stay home. It’s better for overall health and recovery,” said Drobac. “The pandemic showed us it is possible, and we need to build on that.”

    Backers acknowledge that the empirical evidence base for home care needs to be developed more, but point to studies showing that moving care to the home doesn’t compromise patient safety.

    A 2021 meta-review published in BMJ Open on hospital at-home care found that the practice “generally results in similar or improved clinical outcomes” and said expansion should be considered amid spiking health care costs. The Congressional Budget Office scored an extension of hospital at-home care through 2024 as costing $5 million — a drop in the bucket of overall health care spending.

    Meanwhile, the pandemic demonstrated it’s doable and that patients want it, the industry advocates said.

    “The Covid pandemic put lighter fluid on the importance of care delivery in the home and meeting patients where they’re at,” said Kevin Riddleberger, co-founder of coalition member DispatchHealth, which brings lab tests, X-rays and other urgent care into the home.

    At-home testing company ixlayer, which is part of Moving Health Home, hopes bringing lab testing into the home can help treat chronic conditions by making it easier to get tested. Emcara, which provides home-based primary care, has seen 40 percent growth year over year, said Eric Galvin, the company’s CEO, largely driven by demand for care in the home.

    Backers hope that leaning on technology like remote patient monitoring to track patients’ health can help reduce costs by catching issues sooner and forestalling the need for expensive drugs and treatments.

    Cheryl Stanton, chief legal and government affairs officer at home care company BrightStar Care, pointed to a study by Avalere her firm commissioned that found that early intervention with targeted personal care services significantly reduced costs.

    “If you’re in the home and see someone is sluggish and starting to go to the bathroom much more than usual, you can say something is wrong and have them tested early to find a UTI, rather than wait until they’ve gone into crisis and have to be hospitalized,” Stanton said.

    And there’s a ready constituency for that message on Capitol Hill and at the White House, given the Medicare hospital insurance trust fund’s looming insolvency, and the impasse in Washington around another possible solution: raising taxes.

    [ad_2]
    #care #home #save #Medicare #lawmakers
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • Telangana: Day care chemotherapy centre inaugurated in Siddipet

    Telangana: Day care chemotherapy centre inaugurated in Siddipet

    [ad_1]

    Hyderabad: The four-bed daycare chemotherapy centre was inaugurated by state health minister Harish Rao at Siddipet on Sunday.

    With the inauguration, cancer patients can come for treatment here rather than travelling to MNJ Cancer Hospital or the NIMS in Hyderabad.

    The state government will provide medical care worth Rs 4 lakhs free of charge to every cancer patient referred here, including CBP, RFT, LFT tests. Along with providing 60 different types of medicines, the centre will provide tele-consultation services.

    MS Education Academy

    According to reports, Siddipet district contains 468 cancer patients, including breast cancer, cervical cancer, oral cancer, lung cancer, rectum cancer, and thyroid cancer to name a few.

    Through the Arogyashri scheme, the government has spent over 800 crores on cancer care since 2014, with MNJ and NIMS hospitals providing essential treatment to cancer patients across the state. The government is taking steps to develop MNJ Hospital as a state cancer centre, with advanced equipment like True BEAM and PET scans.

    Palliative care services are being provided by the state government in 33 districts to terminally ill patients.

    In addition to this welfare schemes such as the Telangana Diagnostic Scheme and Telangana Health Profile Scheme offers state-of-the-art services required for detecting cancer at the primary stage.

    Speaking on the occasion, Harish Rao praised the KCR government for its consistent efforts in creating awareness regarding the disease and urging citizens to practise a healthy lifestyle.

    “With its tireless efforts in cancer care, the Telangana government is leading the way in cancer prevention, detection, and treatment, thus bringing hope to millions of families,” he said.

    [ad_2]
    #Telangana #Day #care #chemotherapy #centre #inaugurated #Siddipet

    ( With inputs from www.siasat.com )

  • Health care access for trans youth is crumbling — and not just in red states

    Health care access for trans youth is crumbling — and not just in red states

    [ad_1]

    aptopix anti transgender healthcare bills missouri 77689

    The impact of gender-affirming care bans — inflamed by the rhetoric on the right about “child grooming” — is rippling beyond Republican-controlled states, making it harder everywhere for transgender youth to receive care and physicians to provide it, eight doctors who provide gender-affirming care to transgender youth told POLITICO. The Human Rights Campaign and the Southern Poverty Law Center, which have been tracking attacks against doctors, report similar findings.

    Even in states without bans, providers said death threats, harassment, fears of litigation and, in some cases, a lack of support from institutions have created a chilling effect that undermines their ability to provide care.

    “I got an email telling me that I’m evil, I’m foolish, my work is opposing God, that I harm children, that I’m going to hell, and that I should die,” said Meredithe McNamara, an assistant professor of pediatrics who specializes in adolescent medicine at Yale University. “The threats, the harassment, the constant fear of, ‘Did I say that right? Is that OK? Should I have said that differently? Did I present my position in a public space as effectively as possible, and also did I say anything that is going to get my family targeted in some way?’”

    Physicians in states where gender-affirming care remains legal said they now spend significant chunks of patient visits either batting down misinformation from parents or talking through kids’ mental health concerns related to the new laws. The bans outlawing therapies in nearly a third of the country threaten to overwhelm clinics in blue states, like Minnesota, that already have waiting lists of anywhere from several months to more than a year and have left red-state providers grappling with how to care for their young transgender patients under the bans.

    “We think about this affecting kids who live in [ban] states, but it’s affecting kids everywhere and it’s affecting care everywhere,” said Angela Kade Goepferd, medical director of the Gender Health Program at Children’s Minnesota. “It affects the families in the states where care is banned, and it affects the families in the states where the care is not.”’

    And the bans keep coming: North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum on Wednesday signed a law banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth. Nebraska lawmakers are poised to enact a similar ban after legislation passed a second round of debate earlier this month. Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey’s emergency regulation requiring transgender youth and adults complete a long checklist before receiving gender-affirming care is scheduled to take effect this week. And Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte is expected to soon sign a ban after legislators adopted his proposed amendments last week over the pleas of their transgender colleague.

    “I’ve sat down and met with transgender youth and adults. I understand their struggles are real, and my heart goes out to them. I firmly believe that, as with all of God’s children, Montanans who struggle with their gender identity deserve love, compassion, and respect,” Gianforte wrote in a letter to Montana’s Republican legislative leadership last week. But, he argued, it is “right and appropriate” to restrict access to hormones and surgery to adults.

    Gianforte and other conservatives argue that kids aren’t mature enough to make serious, life-altering medical decisions, even with parental consent, and have expressed concerns about the long-term outcomes of such interventions.

    While some doctors, especially those early in their careers, said the bans have inspired them to work harder and continue providing this kind of care, others who are older said they have considered quitting or retiring early — though they acknowledge doing so would make it even harder for their patients to receive care. There are an estimated 300,000 transgender youth in the U.S. and about 60 comprehensive gender clinics for children and adolescents, though care can also be provided outside of those settings, according to the Human Rights Campaign and the Williams Institute, a think tank that researches sexual orientation and gender identity law at the UCLA School of Law.

    The pediatricians told POLITICO that part of their ethos is being an advocate for children, but the threats have left them worried about their personal safety, and the safety of their families, patients and hospitals. Four of the doctors interviewed were granted anonymity because of fears about threats to their safety, their clinic, their patients or their own family, or because they were not authorized to speak by their institution, in some cases because of the threats.

    But some of the doctors said they feel that by staying quiet they are protecting their institution’s safety but letting down their patients.

    “I know many of my colleagues feel like when we’re doing what they need us to do for our protection and our institution’s protection, many of us also feel like we’re letting the community who needs us the most down,” a blue state pediatrician said.

    Those willing to speak on the record said they were doing so either because they had no family, had talked through the possible risks with their spouses and children, or because they felt protected and supported to speak publicly by their hospital or clinic.

    “As our legislature also votes to advance constitutional carry, and as AR-15s are incredibly easy to get, there’s a non-zero chance somebody might kill me, and I know that. I don’t like it. At least I would die standing up for my values, but I’ve had to make peace with that,” said Alex Dworak, associate medical director of family medicine at OneWorld and assistant professor of family medicine at University of Nebraska Medical Center.

    Targeting physicians is not new: The ’70s and ’80s saw a wave of attacks against abortion clinics, including 110 cases of arson, firebombing or bombing. Three people were killed inside a Colorado Planned Parenthood in 2015. And just last year, an under-construction abortion clinic in Casper, Wyo. was set on fire.

    While Arkansas was the first state to enact a gender-affirming care ban in 2021 — after the legislature overrode then-Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson’s veto — doctors told POLITICO that the threats didn’t begin in earnest until the following year when Boston Children’s was targeted on social media and received several bomb threats over the summer and fall.

    In 2023, those threats have continued as more red states approve bans as part of a broader agenda that includes preventing transgender people from participating in sports or using bathrooms in accordance with their gender identity and restricting access to drag shows.

    According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate speech, 24 hospitals and clinics that provide gender-affirming care to transgender youth have been targeted on social media over the last year, resulting in bomb threats, death threats to medical staff and temporary suspensions of services. And the Human Rights Campaign said the attacks have steadily increased.

    “We launched our gender health program at Children’s Minnesota in 2019 — the front page of our Star Tribune here in Minneapolis — and barely a peep,” Goepferd said. “We have really been, up until recently, able to provide good, high-quality care in a way that we would all want to, regardless of what speciality in pediatrics we were in.”

    Every major medical association, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychological Association, supports the use of gender-affirming care to treat transgender people with gender dysphoria, or the feelings of discomfort or distress some transgender people experience when their bodies don’t align with their gender identity. For transgender youth, that typically includes social support, mental health help, puberty blockers, hormone therapy and, very rarely, gender-affirming surgery.

    Those who oppose gender-affirming care argue that kids should wait until they are adults to make the decision to take hormones or undergo surgery, and that the science around such treatments is unsettled.

    “Children suffering discomfort with their sex are best served by compassionate mental health care that enables them to live comfortably in their bodies and with their true identities as male or female,” Matt Sharp, senior counsel and director of the Center for Legislative Advocacy at the conservative legal powerhouse Alliance Defending Freedom, which has helped conservative lawmakers draft trans-focused bills, said in a statement. He added that the organization will “continue to protect children from harmful, irreversible, and unnecessary medical procedures.”

    The American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychological Association have released statements, published op-eds and documents in support of gender-affirming care and provided coaching and technical assistance to state-level affiliates that they say are closer to the legislative process and better suited to testifying at hearings. But several providers said they need more support.

    “Right now, individual providers show up in public spaces and we feel like we get seen as lone actors, and that we don’t have the backing of large credible institutions, and that’s a really scary reality,” McNamara said. “It’s no longer like, so-and-so who speaks for the American Medical Association says this. It’s this person who you’ve never heard of is here — and it makes us much easier to target.”

    Jack Resneck Jr., president of the American Medical Association, said that the association “stands in vehement opposition to governmental attempts to criminalize or otherwise impede on clinical decision-making.” Resneck added that the AMA has worked with state medical associations to oppose gender-affirming care bans since legislation first emerged in 2020 and has also been involved in legal challenges.

    Mark Del Monte, the American Academy of Pediatrics’ chief executive officer and executive vice president, called gender-affirming care “vital to the health and wellbeing of our gender-diverse patients.”

    Doctors in blue states also said they are happy to see legislatures enact so-called shield laws protecting access to gender-affirming care — as California, Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Mexico and Washington have done — but some worry those policies will not hold up in court.

    These doctors said they’re also worried about whether they will have the capacity to provide care to out-of-state patients given that most have waitlists that are several months long.

    “It makes me worried about how we can adequately meet the needs of patients and families both here in Washington who have been on our waiting list for many months, but also so many patients and families that are uprooting their lives to be able to continue care,” said Gina Sequeira, co-director of Seattle Children’s Gender Clinic.

    Broadly, the doctors worry about the future practice of gender-affirming care. They say that not only is the chilling effect from the bans stymieing research and collaboration, but also they fear that it will dissuade future doctors from going into an already small field and prevent doctors from receiving training.

    “I am hopeful that I can be a quiet country doc and not have this be a part of my life. That is my hope, that this is not forever,” a red state pediatrician said. “But it’s hard to see that. It’s hard to see that future.”

    [ad_2]
    #Health #care #access #trans #youth #crumbling #red #states
    ( With inputs from : www.politico.com )

  • THE LITTLE LOOKERS Portable Baby Skin Care Baby Powder Puff with Box Holder Container for New Born and Kids for Baby Face and Body (Blue’)

    THE LITTLE LOOKERS Portable Baby Skin Care Baby Powder Puff with Box Holder Container for New Born and Kids for Baby Face and Body (Blue’)

    31dhOT6Z+7L31kiIfAlu2L21eCX6Aj5WL31YGbFhjzLL31lnZhaFkzL
    Price: [price_with_discount]
    (as of [price_update_date] – Details)

    ISRHEWs
    [ad_1]
    Absorb the excess moisture on the body of your little angel by dabbing powder on him/her with this powder puff with a case that is brought from the little lookers. The material of this powder puff is soft on the sensitive skin of a baby. It minimizes the power loss and comes in a protective case to keep it as good as new. Not only is it easy to use but also to maintain. Made of bpa free plastic, it is durable. The 55 year old reputed name for all things toddlers anand collection brings to you their online extension the little lookers. We deal in baby basics, accessories & apparels your own trusted newborns’ store is now online. Shop from the comforts of your home.
    Product Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 10.2 x 8.1 x 6.1 cm; 100 Grams
    Date First Available ‏ : ‎ 9 September 2019
    Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ THE LITTLE LOOKERS
    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07XQFGS9Q
    Item model number ‏ : ‎ powderpuffblue
    Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ THE LITTLE LOOKERS, The Little Lookers,4B/145,Buddhi Vihar,Moradabad-244001,UP,India.+918979386370
    Packer ‏ : ‎ The Little Lookers,4B/145,Buddhi Vihar,Moradabad-244001,UP,India.+918979386370
    Importer ‏ : ‎ The Little Lookers,4B/145,Buddhi Vihar,Moradabad-244001,UP,India.+918979386370
    Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 100 g
    Item Dimensions LxWxH ‏ : ‎ 10.2 x 8.1 x 6.1 Centimeters
    Net Quantity ‏ : ‎ 1 Count
    Generic Name ‏ : ‎ Baby products

    The soft acrylic puff helps to apply the talcum powder.
    Evenly on your baby’s skin. Made up of non-toxic material.
    Made from unbreakable material. Soft finest fur material.
    Easy to use. Suitable from birth.

    [ad_2]
    #LOOKERS #Portable #Baby #Skin #Care #Baby #Powder #Puff #Box #Holder #Container #Born #Kids #Baby #Face #Body #Blue