London: Britain’s first female Sikh MP Preet Kaur Gill has said she was forced to contact police after receiving a threatening email message saying: “watch your back”.
The senior Labour MP for Birmingham, Edgbaston said that following the email, she is forced to keep a bodyguard at her constituency surgery meetings.
“It was very direct. It’s a worry because I’m with my daughters in the constituency all the time. My family live there. It really puts into context the kind of job that you do. It’s tough enough as it is, but then when you’re faced with that, there’s very little support. This latest direct threat has really worried and concerned me,” Gill told GB News on Saturday.
“As a woman, when you put yourself forward and you want to address injustices and you care about issues that affect your constituents, you’re then faced with people that think it’s okay to say this sort of stuff to you.”
Instead of using an alias, the threat was sent from a legitimate account with a genuine email address, which left Gill shocked.
“I could not believe that this person used their place of work email to actually make that threat,” Gill, who had been a target of hate campaigns in the past, said.
Gill has reported the incident to the West Midlands Police.
“Once you’ve raised it with the police, they’ve got to go away and do an investigation, but there’s no real understanding of the impact it has on you, your everyday work, the psychological impact, the kind of always looking behind your shoulder,” she told GB News.
Gill was recently accused of undermining victims of sexual abuse, according to a Guardian report.
The Shadow Secretary of State for International Development, had sent a series of WhatsApp messages on a group undermining allegations of sexual abuse within gurdwaras.
The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Rishi Sunak, said on Monday (27) that he will submit to a vote in Parliament the agreement reached with the European Union (EU) to reform the Protocol on Northern Ireland.
“Parliament will hold a vote, at the appropriate time, and that vote will be respected,” Sunak told a news conference.
Sunak would also go to the House of Commons this Monday to explain the agreement with the EU to British MPs. This is one of the prime minister’s main challenges at the beginning of his term, in particular the need to obtain the support of the more eurosceptic wing of the Conservative Party and the Democratic Unionist Party of Northern Ireland (DUP), which are the forces that lead the opposition to the current protocol.
The leader of the DUP, Jeffrey Donaldson, assured that he will not give an immediate answer on his position, but that he will take time to analyze the text signed in Windsor by Sunak and the president of the European Commission, Ursula Von der Leyen.
“It is important that we give everyone the time and space they need to study in detail the new regime that we have announced”, said the prime minister.
Sunak has a large majority in the House of Commons, which makes an eventual rebellion in the conservative ranks difficult. In addition, he was assured that the largest opposition Labor Party would secure the necessary votes to move the deal forward.
“Due to the nature and breadth of the deal, it will take some time for everyone to digest. But ultimately, it’s not about me or the politicians, it’s about the people of Northern Ireland and what is better for them”, assured Sunak.
According to the current protocol, Northern Ireland is included in the Community and British internal market, so trade controls between the United Kingdom and the EU are carried out between the island of Great Britain and Ireland, which avoids the increase of a physical border between the two Irelands and allows not to jeopardize the 1998 Good Friday peace agreement.
This commercial border, located on the Irish Sea, has also created political problems among unionists, as they consider it to be detrimental to their relationship with the rest of the United Kingdom.
[ad_2]
#Northern #Ireland #deal #voted #British #Parliament
( With inputs from : pledgetimes.com )
United Kingdom.- The Royal Institution of the British Commonwealth (CHOGM), led by the King Charles III and founded by the late Queen Elizabeth II, officially expelled her son and wife, the Dukes of SussexHarry and Meghan Markle.
This association is made up of just over 50 independent and semi-independent countries that maintain historical connections with the United Kingdom, and its leader has just expelled Prince Harry already Meghan Markle.
We recommend you read…
It must be remembered that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been causing controversy for a long time statements and statements against the crown British, who distanced themselves from the royal family since last 2020.
The real problem between royalty and the dukes arose after the youngest son of King Carlos III and the Diana Princess of Walesas well as Meghan Markle, they accused the crown of racism and to give favoritism some family members above others.
We recommend you read…
In fact, Prince Harry just released his autobiographical book and documentary with his wife on the platform Netflix where both explain all the injustices and things they experienced as part of the British royal family.
It is for this reason that the eldest son of Queen Elizabeth II would have decided to punish both of them with something that really hurt them to lose, in this case it was being removed from their posts as President and Vice President of the Commonwealth.
It must be remembered that said association was created to discuss important issues that affected the same institution and the world in general.
As if this were not all, it is still not clear if Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will be invited to the coronation ceremony of Carlos III, where he will officially become the sovereign of the United Kingdom after the death of his mother.
I am a first generation graduate of the Bachelor of Communication Sciences at the Autonomous University of Sinaloa (UAS) Culiacán, with an emphasis on Organizational Communication, although I have always had a passion for journalism and radio. I did my professional internship at the Culiacán City Hall, writing and recording notes for a radio newscast, and currently, I write for the news portal debate.com.mx, focused on the entertainment section, and controversial issues in the states from the South of Mexico, as well as police, since I have an affinity for writing about sensitive, violent and human-focused topics. Today, I am a Law Degree student at the Autonomous University of Sinaloa and an inveterate fan of BLACKPINK.
A British court sentenced three people— couple and their accomplice to prison, on charges of attempting to bring two Iraqis into the United Kingdom (UK) by hiding them in sofas, local media reported.
The couple, 48-year-old Nicholas Fulwood and his wife 45-year-old Pamela, from the Midlands region of the United Kingdom, tried to smuggle immigrants from Iraq to Britain inside sofas with the help of a car wash company manager named Azad Ahmadi.
On Monday, February 20, Nicholas Fullwood was jailed for three years, while his wife was handed a two-year sentence, the Independent reported.
Ahmadi, was sentenced to four years and six months in prison.
On January 5, 2019, the couple was stopped when trying to enter the UK, in a Peugeot Boxer van, by Border Force officers in the UK control zone in Coquelles, France.
As per media reports, the couple told officers they were on their way back to the UK after shipping furniture in Lille, in northern France.
Upon searching the truck, the officers found two Iraqi immigrants at the base of two different sofas.
It is reported that, the three were sentenced for conspiracy to assist illegal immigration, following an investigation by the Criminal and Financial Investigation Unit of the Ministry of Interior.
London: A Bangladeshi-origin British woman, who fled the UK as a 15-year-old schoolgirl to join the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist network, on Wednesday lost a legal bid before a specialist tribunal to regain her British citizenship and return to the country.
Now aged 23, London-born Shamima Begum had challenged then Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s decision to revoke her British citizenship on national security grounds in 2019 at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC).
Justice Robert Jay ruled that concerns raised by her lawyers over her “sexual exploitation” and breaches of duty by certain state bodies did not trump the home secretary’s legal duty to make a national security decision to strip Begum of her British nationality.
“There is some merit in the argument that those advising the secretary of state see this as a black and white issue, when many would say that there are shades of grey,” said Justice Jay.
“In my mind and that of colleagues, it is not conceivable that even a 15-year-old… an intelligent, articulate and presumably critically thinking individual – would not know what (ISIS) was about. In some respects, I do believe she knew what she was doing and had agency in doing so,” the judgment notes.
The British government has claimed Begum could seek a Bangladeshi passport given her heritage but her family has argued that she is British and has never held Bangladeshi citizenship.
The specialist tribunal accepted that Javid’s conclusion to revoke her British citizenship was “an integral part of the overall national security assessment carried out by the Security Service” and therefore not a matter for the court.
“If asked to evaluate all the circumstances of Begum’s case, reasonable people with knowledge of all the relevant evidence will differ, in particular in relation to the issue of the extent to which her travel to Syria was voluntary and the weight to be given to that factor in the context of all others,” notes Justice Jay.
“Likewise, reasonable people will differ as to the threat she posed in February 2019 to the national security of the United Kingdom, and as to how that threat should be balanced against all countervailing considerations. However, under our constitutional settlement these sensitive issues are for the secretary of state to evaluate and not for the Commission,” he said.
Begum, referred to as an ISIS bride for marrying a Dutch member of the terror network in Syria, gave birth to three children – all of whom later died. She and two fellow teenage schoolgirls at Bethnal Green Academy travelled from east London to Syria in 2015.
At a five-day SIAC hearing in November last year, Begum’s lawyers said that she was “recruited, transported, transferred, harboured and received in Syria for the purposes of ‘sexual exploitation’ and ‘marriage’ to an adult male”.
Justice Jay found that there was “credible suspicion” Begum was a victim of trafficking to Syria.
“The motive of bringing her to Syria was sexual exploitation for which, as a child, she could not give valid consent,” he said, during a brief hearing on Wednesday.
However, the commission ultimately concluded the home secretary was not formally required to consider whether Begum was a victim of trafficking when he removed her citizenship.
The UK Home Office welcomed the ruling and said in a statement: “We are pleased that the court has found in favour of the government’s position in this case.
“The government’s priority remains maintaining the safety and security of the UK and we will robustly defend any decision made in doing so.” Last year, the UK Supreme Court upheld the decision to bar the now 23-year-old from returning to the UK. Begum currently lives in a detention camp in northern Syria and has been fighting to return to her home in east London, claiming the only law she broke was to travel to Syria and had not participated in any ISIS atrocities.
Her legal team has indicated plans to mount further challenges to restore her British citizenship.
Voting record Oliver, who now has dual German/British nationality, has yet to vote in a general election in this country. He’s a member of the Green party and describes himself as: “Not a Corbynista, but left of Starmer.” In Germany, he voted for the Social Democratic party.
Amuse bouche When visiting Madame Tussauds, Oliver was mistaken for a waxwork. “Someone came up to me and looked for a label, then got a bit of a shock when I moved.”
Peter, 58, Birmingham
Occupation Software engineer; also runs an alternative clothing company
Voting record Has voted for all three main parties, and the Monster Raving Loony party. In the next general election he’ll probably vote Labour, “on the basis that the Conservatives are inept”.
Amuse bouche Peter has 11 children (three acquired by marriage), ranging in age from 19 to 42, and 11 grandchildren. “Names I can manage; birthdays, I have to keep a calendar.”
For starters
Peter We did a bit of small chat – what do you do, where are you from? He seemed quiet and reserved, but as soon as we started talking he relaxed. It was funny we were both in software.
Oliver It was Indian street food, really nice. We shared starters – aubergine fritters and onion bhajis – then I had a dosa and he had grilled chicken.
The big beef
Peter The royal family was a clear area of disagreement. For me, it’s a positive. I like the tradition, the consistency, the fact that even though they don’t have direct executive power I’m sure they influence politicians. They are good diplomats and bring in tourist business.
Oliver I’m a republican – the monarchy should be abolished. I don’t believe someone should be in a position of power by accident of birth. The Queen was very popular and probably did a reasonable job, but if you had someone totally unhinged as king or queen, there’s nothing you could do. Andrew is still eighth in the line of succession – if the others fell under a bus, would the royalists be happy with that?
Peter I don’t think an elected head of state would work well – look at Trump.
Oliver In Germany, the two chambers of parliament appoint a group to elect the president. You don’t get extremists because compromise is involved.
Sharing plate
Oliver He’s against Brexit, otherwise we would have had a screaming match. Leaving the EU has caused so many problems – it’s a no-brainer to be part of the biggest trade and political union.
Peter I started with an open mind, but nobody could give me a reason for doing it that actually stood up to scrutiny. And it’s been an absolute car crash.
Oliver My suspicion is that Russia had a hand in Brexit: splitting us off from the rest of Europe can only be of interest to someone like Putin. My parents don’t visit us any more because they don’t have passports.
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
Peter It was based on misleading populism. My clothing business was crashed by Brexit. I’m 100% against it.
For afters
Oliver I feel that all ex-imperial countries – pretty much every country in Europe – have done horrendous things and they should apologise.
Peter I would apologise if I – not my ancestors – had done something wrong. The idea that Britain should apologise for something that happened 200 or 300 years ago doesn’t compute.
Oliver I feel strongly about this from a German perspective. I’m not responsible for the Holocaust – I was born 30 years after it happened. I am responsible for making sure it doesn’t happen again. I think Britain is very bad at dealing with its past. In Germany, some people say it’s going too far – digging out everything that went wrong and feeling guilty about it – but if you don’t, things will just get repeated.
Peter I think it’s an oversimplification to say the empire was all wrong and we are all evil scum. Those countries benefited as well. We took our system of law into the world and the world is a better place for it.
Takeaways
Oliver It was mostly details we disagreed on. It was interesting to talk about things you wouldn’t normally talk about with someone you don’t know. We got on well – we are both tolerant.
Peter I get involved in online discussions, but they tend to be shouting: “You’re wrong.” So, I really enjoyed the chance to kick ideas around with someone who was intelligent and well read and prepared to argue his point.
Additional reporting: Kitty Drake
Oliver and Peter ate at Zindiya in Birmingham.
Want to meet someone from across the divide? Find out how to take part
[ad_2]
#Dining #divide #oversimplification #British #empire #wrong
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )
It is slated to be the “western world’s museum of museums”, a showcase of Greece’s greatest repository of ancient art.
Once completed, the revamped National Archaeological Museum in Athens will, say officials, not only have been expanded but “reborn” at a time of record tourism to the country.
“Today I have been profoundly persuaded that a personal dream of mine has become reality,” the Greek prime minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis told an audience at the museum for the unveiling of the new design on Wednesday.
The emblematic work, overseen by the British architect Sir David Chipperfield, is expected to last five years. Presenting the plans, the Briton emphasised that the goal was not to compete with the museum’s main neoclassical building, which houses one of the finest collections of antiquities globally, but to complement the historic landmark by drawing on the original design. “Our architectural approach has been to create a plinth growing out of the existing building … [that] at the same time develops into a powerful piece of architecture,” he said.
“The challenge, of course, is to get those two things in balance.”
The proposed renovation was unanimously selected from a shortlist of 10 by an international evaluation committee last month. Chipperfield, renowned for his restoration of the Neues Museum in Berlin, has calculated the construction will generate about 20,000 sq m of additional space, including two floors of subterranean galleries, a lush roof garden and street-level entrance.
But like most public works it is controversial.
Not since the Acropolis Museum was built back in 2009 at the foot of the fifth century BC site has a project of such scope stirred such debate or emotion. Before the proposed design had been chosen, the Association of Greek Architects had threatened to take the issue of the competition’s rules to the Council of State, the country’s supreme administrative court, after it became clear that only award-winning foreign firms with experience in museum work would be permitted to participate.
“It is unacceptable that Greek architects were not allowed to take part,” said Tassis Papaioannou, emeritus professor of architecture at the National University of Athens. “We are seriously thinking of taking it to court because the way they have proceeded so far is illegal.”
Greek renovation experts have also objected to the scale of the new entrance, saying photorealistic images released by the winning team are overly optimistic. “The new construction will virtually eclipse the original 19th building from public view at street level,” said Costas Zambas, who headed restoration works at the Acropolis for 25 years. “After yesterday’s presentation it is clear that what is one of the great neoclassical monuments in Athens will be hidden if this overly optimistic approach is allowed.”
Chipperfield, described as a master of works dealing “in dignity, in gravitas, in memory and in art”, told the Guardian his team had wrestled with similar concerns. “You can’t make an omelette without breaking eggs,” he said after the presentation. “From certain angles, it is true, it will have an impact but the question is whether it amounts to significant harm or whether [the change in view] is just different. It’s a perfectly valid question. Our concerns are not dissimilar.”
Mitsotakis, whose centre right government faces re-election this year, has made the renovation a cultural priority, saying it will not only put the institution on the map but help revive an entire district in downtown Athens.
“We display less than 10% of what we have in our warehouses,” he said of its vast collection. “It has always troubled me that just over 500,000 visitors come to the museum every year when it hosts such an incredible wealth of world cultural heritage.”
[ad_2]
#British #architect #choice #controversial #revamp #Athens #museum #museums
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )
The European Commission has contacted the Swedish authorities after it emerged they were planning to deport a 74-year-old British woman with severe Alzheimer’s because she did not have her post-Brexit paperwork in order.
At the same time, the office of the foreign secretary, James Cleverly, is trying to ascertain the exact circumstances that have led to the removal threat faced by Kathleen Poole, who cannot speak, walk or feed herself and is bedbound in a care home.
Fears that the authorities in Sweden may carry out the threat to deport Poole were fuelled after the police got in touch with the Swedish embassy with a “formal request” for a travel document for her.
Poole’s son, Wayne, said he was concerned that if he applied for a new passport for her it would make inevitable and speed up the deportation process, which he was trying to delay in the hope someone steps in to save his mother.
“I am just exhausted by all of this,” he said. “The whole thing is draining. The hope is always there and we will do whatever we can to stop it.”
The British embassy has now told him “they are legally obliged to issue travel documents after the police request without your consent”, according to an official.
Poole said he doubts the police would be able to get his mother on a plane because of the huge logistics involved. She cannot walk and needs a hoist to be moved from her bed to a wheelchair in the care home.
“It is just not right,” he said.
The case has been described as “shocking” by Labour MP and former Brexit select committee chair Hilary Benn, who on Monday called on both London and Brussels “to put a stop to the deportation of a vulnerable British citizen”.
A spokesperson for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said: “We are aware of this case and looking for any ways to make progress for the family.”
It is also understood that the foreign minister David Rutley, the MP for Macclesfield where Kathleen Poole is originally from, has also been in touch with her family to offer support.
Poole and her late husband sold up and bought a new home in Sweden 18 years ago to be close to her son and Swedish daughter-in-law and four young grandchildren. She developed Alzheimer’s at 63 and has been in a care home for the past 10 years.
She had permanent residency in Sweden but was required to renew that paperwork post-Brexit.
The application made by her family on her behalf was rejected on the grounds that her passport was not up to date and there was no financial paperwork showing she was self-sufficient.
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
Angelica Poole, Kathleen’s daughter-in-law, said they appealed against the decision, explaining that the 74-year-old was incapacitated, bedbound and did not update her passport because “she wasn’t going anywhere”.
They were shocked when the police turned up at the care home to make an inventory of her wardrobe and personal belongings.
The European Commission said it could not comment on individual cases but added: “We are aware of this case and are in touch with the Swedish authorities.”
A spokesperson said that protections were put in place to protect UK citizens who had been lawfully in an EU member state before Brexit happened.
They said: “The withdrawal agreement has robust safeguards that ensure that any refusal must be proportionate and appealable to an independent domestic court.”
The treaty “protects those UK nationals who resided in an EU member state according with EU law before the transition period and who continue to reside there in accordance with the withdrawal agreement”, the spokesperson added.
The Swedish government has been contacted for a response, but said “by law” it was not allowed to comment on individual cases.
[ad_2]
#Brussels #contacts #Sweden #plans #deport #British #woman #Alzheimers
( With inputs from : www.theguardian.com )
The harem culture was common in all royal households in India and it is this very culture that has resulted in succession wars. A common understanding is that the harem and the zenana are one and the same and the terms are most often used interchangeably. The harem was an institution in which as Ruby Lal says gender relations were structured, enforced, and also contested. The harem became over a period of time a bounded space that could be understood as a family. It was a space occupied by royal women and their service class.
The number of women in one’s harem was perceived as one of the major symbols of the state’s power and grandeur. It is here that we see the intertwining of sexuality and power which helps to explore the human expression and social identity of prominent individuals whose interpersonal relationships, physical and psychological well-being were directly associated with the power dynamics of the state.
Harem photographs of the reigns of Mir Mahboob Ali Khan and Mir Osman Ali Khan, the sixth and seventh Nizams of the Hyderabad state, are illustrative of Hyderabad’s pomp and pageantry, splendour and spectacle presenting the zenana as wives, mothers, sisters, as well as cohorts and concubines. Records show routine events like the Nizam visiting the royal women, preparation for marriages, and distribution of gifts.
An interesting and well-loved personality of Hyderabad’s regal past was the sixth Nizam Mir Mahboob Ali Khan who ruled from 1884 to 1911. Mahboob was hardly two years old when he succeeded to the masnad under the regency of Nawab Turab Ali Khan, Salar Jung I and Amir-i-Kabir Nawab Rasheeduddin Khan, the head of the Paigah family. Mahboob’s life was short, he was barely in his early forties when he passed away but his life was so eventful that his period is often referred to as the romantic period of Hyderabad.
Mir Osman Ali Khan, the last Nizam of the erstwhile state of Hyderabad.
Some writers have subtly tried to bring out the guarded chapter of Mahboob’s life that was not just a result of his biological promptings but one that operated within the field of power relations. John Zubrzycki in his book The Last Nizam: The Rise and Fall of India’s Greatest Princely State says that Mahboob Ali Khan was barely 16 when he met his successor Osman Ali Khan’s mother, Amat-uz Zehra, who was one among the several hundred women in the zenana. It is believed that she was the granddaughter of the minister Salar Jung I. In The Magnificent Diwan: The Life and Times of Sir Salar Jung I, Bakhtiar Dadabhoy adds to this by saying that she was a Shia Muslim. It is said that the teenage Mahboob had developed an infatuation with a young girl to whom he was writing love letters. When Salar Jung I turned worried at this, the Britisher Captain Clerk suggested that it was time to get the young prince married. But Salar Jung I was not interested in Mahboob marrying any girl from the zenana. The extent of British intervention in Mahboob’s private affairs is unimaginable and extraordinary when seen in the quantum of measuring complex power relations between the British and Hyderabad. The following details open up private facts of Mahboob’s zenana that have been compulsive and influential.
Caroline Keen’s more detailed analysis in Princely India and the British speaks of a particular meeting in Hyderabad in 1882 between Resident W B Jones and the minister Salar Jung I, where the issue of living quarters was discussed for a possible wife of Mahboob so that he does not get into intimate physical relations with other members of the zenana as was the practice of the royal household. On the flip side, this proposal if implemented would also limit Mahboob’s visits to his mother as this would give him less access to the zenana. Anyway, the British were keen that if the Nizam wanted to marry, any marriage of Mahboob should have the approval of his mother and grandmother.
The British officials in the state wanted Mahboob’s future wife to remain in the Purani Haveli, the official residence of the Nizam, and no women other than those who would attend to her would have access. Salar Jung I resented this as this was against the customs of the zenana and would be insulting to the new bride. Salar Jung I also surmised to the Resident that since the Purani Haveli was the place of stay of the zenana, the Nizam could not be curtailed from accessing the zenana chambers. And of course, he said in no uncertain terms that the British had no right to impose restrictions on the Nizam in his personal life which implied that Mahboob finding opportunities to access the zenana could not be stopped. Such an arrangement of keeping Mahboob away from the zenana would also displease the matrons of the zenana who enjoyed powerful positions. The Resident could not understand and felt that Salar Jung I was acting difficult.
Captain Clerk, who was also Nizam’s tutor, then wrote to the British government of India that Mahboob was keen to solemnise his marriage before he turned 18 as there was a belief if he didn’t marry now he would have to wait for a full one year. Bakhtiar Dadabhoy hits the bull’s eye by calling the British ‘matchmakers’ who were trying to debate whether the girl should be a Hyderabadi nobleman’s daughter or from another Princely State. These considerations were naturally based on political allegiances.
The British were also worried that Mahboob might soon father a child if he married and could also father a child if he didn’t marry. Salar Jung I did not give in to Clerk’s demands as he knew pretty well that if Mahboob married at this young age he would have his own palace which would be independent of the British. Anyway, Mahboob did not marry that young and it was accepted by the British government that the firstborn male whether legitimate or born in the zenana would be recognised as having the first claim to the masnad.
Dadabhoy gives further details of Server ul Mulk, who was later appointed assistant to Clerk, telling the Resident Sir Richard Meade that Salar Jung I was interested in marrying his daughter to the Nizam. Tahniat Yaver-ud-Daula, the Vakil-e-Sultanate had even approached Nizam’s grandmother with this proposal. This would make Salar Jung I more powerful. This is how Amat uz Zehra in whom Mahboob had shown interest was married to him. She was the granddaughter of Salar Jung I through a mutah marriage with a Hindu lady Pritamji. Many books including V K Bawa’s The Last Nizam based on the account of Hosh Bilgrami, the Peshi Secretary of Osman Ali Khan testify that Osman Ali Khan referred to Pritamji as his mother’s munh boli nani.
Caroline Keen says the British expressed a lot of concern about the laxities seen in the zenana which was prevalent for years and Sir David Barr, appointed the Resident in 1900, wanted the eldest son of the Nizam to be recognised as heir and also have a recognised wife with whom he could lead a happy and respectable life which was not known in Hyderabad’s palaces for years. Sir David Barr even goes to the extent of calling the zenana the worst aspect of the Hyderabad palace; the number of women maintained at the cost of His Highness was nearer to 10,000 than 5,000. Living under unsanitary conditions and their manners and customs, according to common reports are altogether shocking and disreputable.
Foster relationships were a common socio-cultural phenomenon that created a dual identity of motherhood i.e., birth mother and foster mother. In Mahboob Ali Khan’s time, when a male child was born there were almost 8 wet nurses chosen for him which had the lurking fear of the infant suffering from over nourishment as Sachidananda Mohanty says in Travel Writing and the Empire. But these practices were not new, the harem has always been a special space, an institution in itself often having separate biological mothers and wet nurses and separate mothers appointed to raise the infants. We see this feature even in the Mughal harem. Look at the other side, the bond created through nursing and raising a child led to a widening of kinship ties with a network of relatives.
The numerous zenana photographs taken by the court photographer of the Nizam, Raja Deen Dayal, during the time of the sixth and seventh Nizams show the celebration of the zenana as an integral part of court culture. Gianna Carotenuto in her thesis on Domesticating the Harem: Reconsidering the Zenana and Representations of Elite Women in Colonial Photography in India talks about “the lavish clothing and the excessive jewellery of the women photographed, each zenana member’s status, hierarchy and influence within the harem, and their relationships to each other and to the Nizam. The range of women who have been portrayed in these pictures emphasize not just the diversity of physical beauty and regional identities of the Nizam’s zenana, but the group photographs indicate the roles and familial associations.” While so many photographs of the Nizam’s zenana show that Nizam commissioned these photographs featuring his wives, children, and concubines and also display them as his possessions.
In the Mysterious Mr Jacob, John Zubrzycki makes a statement about the reason for the death of Mahboob saying Mahboob drank himself to death after a row with one of his many wives in 1911. Narendra Luther seconds this in his book on Raja Deen Dayal: Prince of Photographers that his second wife insisted so much that he appoint her son as the heir apparent that it impacted him to an extent of slipping into a coma. Zubrzycki says that Jacob, the diamond owner who sold the stone to Mahboob, had found the latter “with heavy eyes that betrayed long nights in the zenana and under the effect of opium which he took in doses that would leave most men barely able to function.” Jacob had an extensive network of informants inside India’s royal courts and gathered information ranging from sexual preferences to political policies. Mahboob was after all Jacob’s best customer buying priceless jewels from him.
Rajender Prasad and K S S Seshan also in passing refer to the pleasures of the harem that made it difficult for Mahboob to distinguish between day and night. After attaining the majority, Mahboob remained a popular ruler and despite all the administrative training he had received, his rule was disappointing since it was suspected that the Nizam was involved more in the zenana and had little time left for statecraft.
Davesh Soneji, in Unfinished Gestures: Devadasi, Memory and Modernity gives a reference to Mahboob patronising dance melams from the telugu speaking regions and in The Days of the Beloved, Harriet Ronken Lynton and Mohini Rajan say that Mahboob was used to keeping the transgenders at his palace for days together singing, leaping and dancing. This again isn’t new to history. From ancient times, we see the transgenders guarding the inner chambers of the palaces.
After Salar Jung I’s death, Laiq Ali Salar Jung II became the minister but court intrigues did not allow Mahboob and Laiq Ali to develop a trustworthy bond. Masuma Hasan’s Pakistan in an Age of Turbulence says Mahboob’s reign is eulogized in the Asaf Jahi period. He was to be groomed as a Victorian gentleman but was addicted to drinking and opium and the pleasures of the zenana that held hundreds of women.
This sudden spurt of writings giving stray peeks into the private life of historical personalities like Mahboob Ali Khan form an important component of the power politics of Hyderabad State and gives a new insight into the period. Such writings are also useful in understanding the present complexities of succession that we see today as a result of the power structure and gender relations that were so intertwined in the harems of yesteryears.
Professor Salma Ahmed Farooqui is Director at the H.K.Sherwani Centre for Deccan Studies, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad.
New Delhi: External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Tuesday spoke to his British counterpart James Cleverly focusing on various aspects of bilateral ties and India’s G-20 presidency.
The phone conversation came ahead of the British foreign secretary’s likely visit to India to attend a meeting of the G-20 foreign ministers on March 1 and 2.
“Received a call from UK Foreign Secretary @JamesCleverly. Reviewed our bilateral relationship and discussed the agenda of India’s G20 Presidency,” Jaishankar tweeted.
It was the first phone conversation between Jaishankar and Foreign Secretary Cleverly after a controversy broke out over a two-part BBC documentary on the 2002 Gujarat riots.
India dismissed the documentary as a “propaganda piece” saying it is designed to push a particular “discredited narrative”.
It is understood that the implementation of a 10-year roadmap between India and the UK to bolster the ties in diverse areas figured in the phone conversation.
However, it is not known whether Jaishankar and Cleverly touched upon the proposed free trade agreement between the two sides.
The India-UK relationship was elevated to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership during the India-UK virtual summit held between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his then British counterpart Boris Johnson in May, 2021.
At the summit, the two sides adopted a 10-year roadmap to expand ties in the key areas of trade and economy, defence and security, climate change and people-to-people connections among others.
The two sides have been engaged in negotiations for a free trade agreement as well.
Prime Minister Modi and his British counterpart Rishi Sunak held talks in Bali in November on the sidelines of the G-20 summit.