Air Force, Ministry of Defense, Seeks Response in Female Pilot Sexual Harassment Case

0
9

Listen to the information

Jammu. The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has sought a response from the officers of the Ministry of Defense and the Air Force in the case of sexual harassment of feminine pilots on a flight commander and harassment in the title of an inner investigation. Justice Sanjeev Kumar directed that the matter be reported to the court docket in 4 weeks.
During the listening to, Yachty’s counsel Aseem Sahni said that the accused officer repeatedly sought to have sexual relations with the petitioner and made objectionable remarks in opposition to her, touching her improperly. The case can be in violation of the Workplace Act (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) 2013 and Armed Forces Rules, in which the complainant is being intentionally tortured in order that he can withdraw his criticism underneath strain. Sahni mentioned that the complainant and his witnesses are being intimidated. In six 6 days, the respondent no.8 happened in the cross examination of the petitioner. About 300 questions had been positioned earlier than the petitioner. Many of the questions had been obscene, which seems to compel the complainant to pressurize him to withdraw the criticism. The advocate mentioned that on the demand of the petitioner, the accused flight commander ought to first be transferred in order that he couldn’t use his affect in this case to threaten the complainant and the witnesses. After the listening to, the court docket has sought a response from the Air Force and the Ministry of Defense. Jnf

Jammu. The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has sought a response from the officers of the Ministry of Defense and the Air Force in the case of sexual harassment of feminine pilots on a flight commander and harassment in the title of an inner investigation. Justice Sanjeev Kumar directed that the matter be reported to the court docket in 4 weeks.

During the listening to, Yachty’s counsel Aseem Sahni said that the accused officer repeatedly sought to have sexual relations with the petitioner and made objectionable remarks in opposition to her, touching her improperly. The case can be in violation of the Workplace Act (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) 2013 and Armed Forces Rules, in which the complainant is being intentionally tortured in order that he can withdraw his criticism underneath strain. Sahni mentioned that the complainant and his witnesses are being intimidated. In six 6 days, the respondent no.8 happened in the cross examination of the petitioner. About 300 questions had been positioned earlier than the petitioner. Many of the questions had been obscene, which seems that the complainant is being pressurized to withdraw the criticism by harassing him. The advocate mentioned that on the demand of the petitioner, the accused flight commander ought to first be transferred in order that he couldn’t use his affect in this case to threaten the complainant and the witnesses. After the listening to, the court docket has sought a response from the Air Force and the Ministry of Defense. Jnf

.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here